New Kernel - Motorola Atrix 2

Accidently posted this in the Atrix 4g section, thought I was here
http://sourceforge.net/motorola/me865/news/2012/05/me865-version-551-1gc-109-oss-has-been-posted/

giveen said:
Accidently posted this in the Atrix 4g section, thought I was here
http://sourceforge.net/motorola/me865/news/2012/05/me865-version-551-1gc-109-oss-has-been-posted/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bump...
Look at this page. Shows file kernel omap4.tar.gz
http://sourceforge.net/projects/me865.motorola/files/ME865/5.5.1-1_GC-109/
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2

smgulsby said:
Bump...
Look at this page. Shows file kernel omap4.tar.gz
http://sourceforge.net/projects/me865.motorola/files/ME865/5.5.1-1_GC-109/
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the ReadMe text file.. #4 shows how to build a kernel - I think - this stuff is beyond me though...
And this is all for ME865...
Sent from my mind using XDA

This is just the Opensource motorola portions of the kernel for the ME865 (international version of the Atrix2), not the WHOLE opensource kernel, this will need to be merged with the google portions, to compile a full kernel.
Besides, we are already running this. Why not try our hands at AOSP kernels such as cyanogenmod, or AOKP, or something else.... we already have the motorola crippled kernel.... LOL...

why have they released the me865 but not mb865 source? I thought they were required to by licensing stuff, since the linux kernel is open source.

lkrasner said:
why have they released the me865 but not mb865 source? I thought they were required to by licensing stuff, since the linux kernel is open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is the catch, they get away with it, since the two phones are identical minus a few things for the mb865 since it is att&t specific.
They (motorola) can say that they released the source code, that was open, and claim that the AT&T specific parts are propietary, and then they will not release those parts, and so, the me865 will work on the mb865, minus the radio, and the audio. So.... it is all a game of what is really "open"

jimbridgman said:
That is the catch, they get away with it, since the two phones are identical minus a few things for the mb865 since it is att&t specific.
They (motorola) can say that they released the source code, that was open, and claim that the AT&T specific parts are propietary, and then they will not release those parts, and so, the me865 will work on the mb865, minus the radio, and the audio. So.... it is all a game of what is really "open"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is why I hate motorola, google at least has enough sense to keep things open even though they did not start the project. just like chrome, android was previously just an open source project that google took on. at least companies like htc are allowing the bootloader to be unlocked completely legally. I just did it for a family member, it voids your warranty, but so what, that is normally only a month anyways

jimbridgman said:
This is just the Opensource motorola portions of the kernel for the ME865 (international version of the Atrix2), not the WHOLE opensource kernel, this will need to be merged with the google portions, to compile a full kernel.
Besides, we are already running this. Why not try our hands at AOSP kernels such as cyanogenmod, or AOKP, or something else.... we already have the motorola crippled kernel.... LOL...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing. Back to cheesecake.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2

Related

New Source Codes!

I think this should have a positive impact on ROM development:
http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-continues-publishing-device-source-codes/
http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
Latest source codes for a number of devices has been published by HTC on HTCdev.
Kerosine said:
I think this should have a positive impact on ROM development:
http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-continues-publishing-device-source-codes/
http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
Latest source codes for a number of devices has been published by HTC on HTCdev.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's just a carrier refresh, nothing really new
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
I see...
Jonny said:
It's just a carrier refresh, nothing really new
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't the files from these documents be used in custom ROMs though? I was under the impression that such files are helpful in ROM development.
Kerosine said:
Can't the files from these documents be used in custom ROMs though? I was under the impression that such files are helpful in ROM development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel source is already out. These are just carrier specific sources...nothing too groundbreaking.
Pity, thought it would help out ROM devs more. Oh well, so long as what's needed is already out, I'm still happy! hehe

Samsung lists devices to get ICS.

http://m.engadget.com/default/artic...-samsung-devices/&category=classic&postPage=1
While obviously our device isn't listed, will an official build from Sammy help our developers?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk
Biohazard0289 said:
http://m.engadget.com/default/artic...-samsung-devices/&category=classic&postPage=1
While obviously our device isn't listed, will an official build from Sammy help our developers?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer to that will always be yes. Official builds help port things like CM, AOKP, and other variants.
Biohazard0289 said:
http://m.engadget.com/default/artic...-samsung-devices/&category=classic&postPage=1
While obviously our device isn't listed, will an official build from Sammy help our developers?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes do to the fact even if we cant use the source (which actually google source is about oh 4000x better.)
The proprietary drivers is what we would after.
RaverX3X said:
yes do to the fact even if we cant use the source (which actually google source is about oh 4000x better.)
The proprietary drivers is what we would after.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great news. You are working with the Tmobile Galaxy S II right? Strange its not included.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk
i built most my aosp sgs2 ics rom without no source other then googles for the build well the chipset manufacture had there own generic source of ics for it which was really really helpfull,

Jelly Bean 4.1 Download (Not usable for flashing, can devs look inside for clues?)

http://android.clients.google.com/p....signed-takju-JRN84D-from-IMM30D.5a07884d.zip
SO there is the link ^ for jelly bean, but it only works for "takju" devices that Google gave out at I/O, so this update is for the GSM Nexuses that were given to developers. I was wondering if any developer can use this and mod it for possible use and flashing with our One X's? Just wondering. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I think we need source code before we do any major porting. Correct me if im wrong
msn.debord said:
I think we need source code before we do any major porting. Correct me if im wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. You are spot on.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
I think we need some more announcements posted on the forums. Obviously we all live under a rock and need to be reminded of its release every 10 minutes with a new thread.
I can haz jealous beanz?
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

[INFO] Why we don't have ICS yet + more info about it

Hi, I have noticed a ton of people curious about why AT&T people do not have ICS yet, so I thought I would answer that once and for all. I admit that I and others have gotten a little mad whenever people ask about this, but it seems they are not able to really find a clear answer, so here it is.
If you feel like this is well done, please sticky it at least until we get it all figured out.
I figure this would be best said i a Q and A type form.
Q: What is ICS, and why does everyone want it so bad?
ICS or "Ice Cream Sandwich" is android version 4.0.x. the next version, 4.1 Jellybean was just released as a slightly less important update, but ICS brought huge changes from Ginger Bread (2.3.x) the previous phone version (3.x HoneyComb was tablet only). ICS brings a slicker, darker, and better looking user interface, as well as many performance enhancements. Most of us want it more because it seems like we should than because it is actually that much better. That said it is still a great update, and most people will be happy to see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: Why is it so hard to get ICS for our phone, while others have it even though it is not officially out?
The main reason is our locked bootloader. That means it is not possible to flash or boot a custom kernel unless it is signed with Motorola's key. That is obviously impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What is a kernel?
the kernel is a major part of any operating system. you can think of it as a sort of layer between hardware and software. It is the part of an OS that communicates directly with a device's hardware. Android is based off the open source Linux kernel, meaning it is free for anybody to build and modify. However, Motorola has only released the source for the ME865, and partially for the MB865, meaning we can't really build a kernel anyways. Then of course, even if we could build one, we wouldn't be able to boot it with our locked bootloader.
ICS is not really complete without the newer kernel that goes with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is Kexec, and is there any way to unlock the bootloader
The fact that I grouped these together would probably lead you to correctly believe they are related. Lets start with the second half. Simply put, NO. I hate to say it, but there is very little hope of EVER unlocking our bootloader, unless Motorola decides to do something like HTC did and allow unlocking.
Kexec is a method of hot switching kernels while still booted. It is actually just a linux tool that you can use on a computer, but it has been built for android essentially allowing you to bypass the bootloader. Theoretically it would be an easy way to run custom kernels. Then why don't we? Well a few reasons. One, we can't really get one built to begin with, especially because, at least to my knowledge, jimbridgman is the only one who actually knows what he is doing with kernel building, and he is only half here now that he got his fany new SGS3. Two, it does not work great. I am not sure the latest version is working at all on our phone, and even if it did, only one processor comes up, meaning it is really slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q: What's the deal with these Droid 3 builds that supposedly boot?
Some people managed to build ICS for the droid 3 based of a 2.3.6 kernel. that means you can boot it on a stock GB kernel, and therefore you do not need to unlock the bootloader. Unfortunately that means it is not totally ICS, but it is still pretty good. Of course they are for a cdma phone, so that means no data, no calls, and no gps, making it kind of useless.
I am not going to give a link to them, but if you are really interested go search around. any of the Droid 3 AOKP and CM9 builds will boot just fine. Find more info in the dev section, but please don't start a thread asking about it.
We have been trying to port these to work for us, but that is proving more difficult than expected, and with ICS just around the corner, I don't want to put time into it. I do think it is possible, and if you are a dev looking to give it a shot, PM me and I will tell you all I know, and try to help out as much as I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Great thread!
Thanks for putting this together!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. I felt it was needed. let me know if I forgot to say something important.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice work kras, as always.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Hell i thought this thread was going to give me info on why att hadn't released ics for us yet. Just kidding, good job. If this thread falls down the list ill bump it so maybe it will help some of the new people and we won't get any more new threads about ics.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Apex_Strider said:
Perhaps this will hopefully curb some of the incessant "where's my ice cream sandwich" or "make me a rom based on ICS" threads here. Nice job, and as always, your work here is both highly appreciated and revered.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
rdavisct said:
No,Most likely once posts stop on this thread and it makes it to the second page we will see more questions im sure lol
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's why I asked for sticky
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Fall of Enosis said:
The good news is that the "3rd quarter" is tomorrow! Which knowing motorola and AT&T, could mean whatever.
Take that with a grain of salt. Lol.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is September
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
gvsukids said:
Why don't we have a vanilla rom? Is it due again to the locked bootloader?
Sent from my MB865
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep. same thing. we have a hard time compiling any also source as you need a custom kernel
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are not right. I can prove it. The latest droid 3 AOKP and Cm9 builds will boot just fine, with no radio
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Ravikirancg said:
DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM9
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't be more wrong....they both boot just fine and are pretty functional, the problem lies in getting the radio to work.
Ravikirancg said:
Nice post..
Just one thing to inform about your last question's ans.. DROID 3'S ROMS DONT WORK ON OUR PHONE. IT WILL BOOTLOOP. SO DO NOT TRY FLASHING THEIR AOKP OR CM.. without backups and sufficient knowledge and experience atleast.. some changes have to be made in the rom before flashing.. i am trying to find all the files we must replace to get them working on our phone.. and just a FYI for those of you that wanna try.. other than droid 3, bionic is our nearest relative.. so u can edit and try their roms as well.. i did kinda get cm9 of bionic after replacing some required files.. but it bootlooped.. and of course bionic is cdma.. so.. good luck..
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
jimbridgman said:
Please I emplore you to do your proper research before making incorrect posts like this. I constantly see posts from those who think they know it all, and post idiotic things like this. Nothing makes me madder than someone who does not know how to use google and the search function.
It takes less than 2 min. to make sure you CYA before posting bad information.
Both CM9 and AOKP boot, but with no radio, as has already been said in several posts now. I have tested both.
P.S. most of us devs in here have been working on this very thing for sometime now, and I have not seen you jump in on any of threads discussing the files or how to port or anything.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, They actually run extremely well, but obviously I can't stick with them with no radio.
P.S. this is my new best thought for porting, might take some extra build.prop work too. It did not boot for me, but I think we should be able to get it to. Then it is just a question of whether or not the radio will work. there is way more in build.prop on that than I would think.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
hankbizzo5 said:
You should also add Why any other leak releases of atrix 2 ICS will not work on att atrix 2..... Sick of will this work on my att..... About to be like yea we all use it lol JK.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW, did I really forget to add that? that was kind of one of the main points of this post I'll fix it tomorrow (actually today, I guess it is after midnight), but I need some sleep.
lkrasner said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
I think it may work because it really adds the cm9 stuff to our own files rather than add our files to it. maybe not the cleanest way, but it might just work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried this method along with every idea that popped in my head of things to alter after following this guide. I have a highly modified build prop that AOKP boots with that I replaced with a lot of our build prop but there are still some things missing as no luck yet

JellyBean kernels in development for NS?

I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
MercilessLTD said:
I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course there is. Every Dev who has created a ICS will make a JB. Not sure this is worthy of a thread start. Next week things will start rolling in Kernels and Rom's. Just enjoy JB.
Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?
063_XOBX said:
Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source seems to be there : https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/samsung
branche : android-samsung-3.0-jb
_thalamus said:
So, I tried to build a JB kernel, but it won't boot. It appears that Google have not pushed the correct kernel source for the JB OTA...
The PVR userspace libs and kernel driver is mismatched.
So, I've requested the correct source on the Android Building groups, and will release a test version whenever they decide to push that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333
jokkir said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read thalamus thread, thats been fixed...
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Air kernel weekly version for JB released
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources