In terms of speed and smoothness when running Ics?
I am considering one of these to buy.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Get the note if speed is your concern
Resale value is also good...plus that massive screen.
Sent from my U8150
Allanitomwesh said:
Get the note if speed is your concern
Resale value is also good...plus that massive screen.
Sent from my U8150
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^ Correct in every way.
Sent from my U8800Pro using xda premium
<------- hit thanks if I helped you.
Allanitomwesh said:
<------- hit thanks if I helped you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hit thanks if I helped you? Lame.
The nexus will run ICS better than the note or SGSII. It is just a better phone overall. The screen is big, but not too big, and the development community is second to none.
I'll choose ur mum in terms of speed and smoothness
Sent from my SGS2 powered by cm9 love
S2 -> Faster processor than GNexus (very fast GPU as well), MicroSD card slot, NFC (for the AT&T i777 and i9100T, which is the same as the i9100 but also has NFC. The AT&T model is based off this one). Low res 800 x 480 screen, but looks higher because of Samsung's screen technology. Non-pentile. Lots of development for AT&T and i9100 models. Easily rooted (Samsung's bootloader allows it). No notification light for non-Sprint model. Note that the Skyrocket/LTE/T-Mobile models do not use Samsung's Exynos processor; they use slower Qualcomm Snapdragons and are not real S2's. And the i9100G is not a real S2, it uses a TI-OMAP processor.
GNexus -> Developer phone, made to be rooted and ROM'd. No MicroSD expansion. 16GB for GSM, 32GB for CDMA models. 720p (very high-res) screen. TI-OMAP processor is slower than the S2's Exynos, but still good for gaming and still smooth. 4.65 inch screen vs 4.3 inch on the i9100/i777 GS2. Basically a slightly slower S2 with no microSD slot and a higher res screen.
Galaxy Note - Slightly faster than S2 (1.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz), I believe 720p screen on 5.3 inches (no pixelation). It's a phablet; in between a tablet and a phone but still manageable and fits in pockets. Has a capacitive stylus; it works on touch screens and doesn't require any pressure. Again, the AT&T/LTE versions use Qualcomm Snapdragons which suck for heavy gaming like GTA III, Shadowgun etc (i717). The international one uses an Exynos like the S2 but @ 1.4GHz instead of 1.2GHz to deal with the higher-res screen.
Personally, I was let down with the GNexus because the processor is old and no MicroSD slot but it's a good dev phone. I'd go for an S2 or a Note.
I'm not a great fan of Samsung's Nexus devices, the only use the leftovers of the Galaxy line for those. The Gnex has that pentile display and not so good battery life. IMHO the Note/GS2 are overall faster devices, especially the GS2 with its lower res. I'd pick the Note if I were you: great battery life and one of the best screens around. You probably won't get JB tho...
lowandbehold said:
Hit thanks if I helped you? Lame.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep your opinion light, there pal. Wasn't talking to ya.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
lowandbehold said:
The nexus will run ICS better than the note or SGSII. It is just a better phone overall. The screen is big, but not too big, and the development community is second to none.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On what basis is it better? The nexus is older,and slower,how then do you base your speed test?
Product F(RED) said:
S2 -> Faster processor than GNexus (very fast GPU as well), MicroSD card slot, NFC (for the AT&T i777 and i9100T, which is the same as the i9100 but also has NFC. The AT&T model is based off this one). Low res 800 x 480 screen, but looks higher because of Samsung's screen technology. Non-pentile. Lots of development for AT&T and i9100 models. Easily rooted (Samsung's bootloader allows it). No notification light for non-Sprint model. Note that the Skyrocket/LTE/T-Mobile models do not use Samsung's Exynos processor; they use slower Qualcomm Snapdragons and are not real S2's. And the i9100G is not a real S2, it uses a TI-OMAP processor.
GNexus -> Developer phone, made to be rooted and ROM'd. No MicroSD expansion. 16GB for GSM, 32GB for CDMA models. 720p (very high-res) screen. TI-OMAP processor is slower than the S2's Exynos, but still good for gaming and still smooth. 4.65 inch screen vs 4.3 inch on the i9100/i777 GS2. Basically a slightly slower S2 with no microSD slot and a higher res screen.
Galaxy Note - Slightly faster than S2 (1.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz), I believe 720p screen on 5.3 inches (no pixelation). It's a phablet; in between a tablet and a phone but still manageable and fits in pockets. Has a capacitive stylus; it works on touch screens and doesn't require any pressure. Again, the AT&T/LTE versions use Qualcomm Snapdragons which suck for heavy gaming like GTA III, Shadowgun etc (i717). The international one uses an Exynos like the S2 but @ 1.4GHz instead of 1.2GHz to deal with the higher-res screen.
Personally, I was let down with the GNexus because the processor is old and no MicroSD slot but it's a good dev phone. I'd go for an S2 or a Note.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but there's a reason Mali-400 has been discontinued. The powervr gpu is so much faster thats why in any benchmark, Gnex or droid razr will finish a good 15-20seconds faster..
Gnex has really good rom support and it is more sexy than a plastic SGSII
sent from Droid Razr Using Xda Premium
MattyOnXperiaX10 said:
I'm sorry but there's a reason Mali-400 has been discontinued. The powervr gpu is so much faster thats why in any benchmark, Gnex or droid razr will finish a good 15-20seconds faster..
Gnex has really good rom support and it is more sexy than a plastic SGSII
sent from Droid Razr Using Xda Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, the new quad core Exynos has an overclocked Mali-400 in it...
And the GNexus is made of plastic and has a horrible camera, so I don't know what you're talking about.
vnvman said:
I'm not a great fan of Samsung's Nexus devices, the only use the leftovers of the Galaxy line for those. The Gnex has that pentile display and not so good battery life. IMHO the Note/GS2 are overall faster devices, especially the GS2 with its lower res. I'd pick the Note if I were you: great battery life and one of the best screens around. You probably won't get JB tho...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with this guy^
While the Galaxy Nexus is great for development and day to day use, it uses year-old parts while the Exynos processor in the GS2 and GNote is the fastest available next to the Tegra 3 and S4 Krait. It's still a mid-high end phone (both the GNote/GS2) while compared to current processors the GNexus is more of a mid-range phone.
The i9100 and GNote have as much development as the Galaxy Nexus to be honest.
Personally, I'd rather have a Nexus. Ain't the fastest, but the best all rounder
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
if speed is your preference then Get the note.
Allanitomwesh said:
<------- hit thanks if I helped you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one of my pet peeves on this site...
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using xda premium
Product F(RED) said:
Actually, the new quad core Exynos has an overclocked Mali-400 in it...
And the GNexus is made of plastic and has a horrible camera, so I don't know what you're talking about.
I agree with this guy^
While the Galaxy Nexus is great for development and day to day use, it uses year-old parts while the Exynos processor in the GS2 and GNote is the fastest available next to the Tegra 3 and S4 Krait. It's still a mid-high end phone (both the GNote/GS2) while compared to current processors the GNexus is more of a mid-range phone.
The i9100 and GNote have as much development as the Galaxy Nexus to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the development is about the same at the S2 and Note as the Gnexus, why bothering buying nexus
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Desaf said:
If the development is about the same at the S2 and Note as the Gnexus, why bothering buying nexus
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Notification light lol
Pretty much a higher res screen and "official development device" status. It'll also be the first to get Jelly Bean officially from Google, not that it matters since the devs here always port ROMs over to other devices effortlessly.
Also, the reason the Galaxy Nexus has a TI-OMAP processor in it and not an Exynos is because Samsung/Google didn't want to build two versions of the device: One GSM/HSPA+ and one CDMA/LTE. Exynos doesn't do LTE, which is why phones like the Skyrocket have the ****ty Snapdragon S3 in them.
Product F(RED) said:
Notification light lol
Pretty much a higher res screen and "official development device" status. It'll also be the first to get Jelly Bean officially from Google, not that it matters since the devs here always port ROMs over to other devices effortlessly.
Also, the reason the Galaxy Nexus has a TI-OMAP processor in it and not an Exynos is because Samsung/Google didn't want to build two versions of the device: One GSM/HSPA+ and one CDMA/LTE. Exynos doesn't do LTE, which is why phones like the Skyrocket have the ****ty Snapdragon S3 in them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also why the GSIII will most likely not have Exynos in the USA...
slapshot30 said:
Also why the GSIII will most likely not have Exynos in the USA...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos, at least the current-gen, doesn't work with LTE or 1700 MHz (T-Mobile's 3G/4G frequency). All carriers are going LTE, and I'm not sure if the new Exynos is LTE-compatible, which means it won't work on any US carriers. So we'll end up having a Skyrocket/T-Mobile SGS2 situation where the phones use a Snapdragon S4, which is the only processor that can do LTE.
America got served. Everybody else got raw power.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
Related
i9000 is currently more than 1 year old, and some may currently be considering their next upgrade/purchase, which model you consider to be the next leading Galaxy phone?
I just bought my Galaxy S, its 1 month old, ill stick with it for another year or so and then upgrade to galaxy s II
Ill stick to my sgs a year more, maybe 1 and a half so maybe galaxy s 3 or 4 or maybe note 2 .
hit thankxx if i helped. sent from my mind through telepathy (ya its possible)!
im just gonna wait for s3 now. im on an 18month contract so sorta tied to sgs until next march anyway might as well hold out until s3 is out there then get on at the bleeding edge
I am curious to see what the the HD screen will look like. It will probably be pentile again, will the resolution be high enough to please my eye? Maybe.
Probably won't buy an S2 though, hoping for a beefier GPU in the S3.
Seeing as the SGS2 GPU is not really out-classing the SGS, I wonder how it will cope with the HD resolution. I'm thinking a higher tier of performance (like the huge future gains nvidia is bragging about, or even something like the SGX543MP2 in the ipad2) will be welcome with newer titles at HD resolution.
I'm torn between the Galaxy Note (1.4Ghz) and SII LTE HD (1.5Ghz).
Both with great screen HD resolution, huge sizes, new exynos processor with better battery life, upgraded GPU and other small changes.
SIII is rumoured to have similar specs, maybe a better screen, so don't know if it's actually worth waiting.
haloimplant said:
I am curious to see what the the HD screen will look like. It will probably be pentile again, will the resolution be high enough to please my eye? Maybe.
Probably won't buy an S2 though, hoping for a beefier GPU in the S3.
Seeing as the SGS2 GPU is not really out-classing the SGS, I wonder how it will cope with the HD resolution. I'm thinking a higher tier of performance (like the huge future gains nvidia is bragging about, or even something like the SGX543MP2 in the ipad2) will be welcome with newer titles at HD resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, sgs 2 has the best gpu in any android 'device'(not only phones) in the whole world - the mali-400 which is nearly 3 time better than sgs's gpu.
hit thankxx if i helped. sent from my mind through telepathy (ya its possible)!
pacc said:
I'm torn between the Galaxy Note (1.4Ghz) and SII LTE HD (1.5Ghz).
Both with great screen HD resolution, huge sizes, new exynos processor with better battery life, upgraded GPU and other small changes.
SIII is rumoured to have similar specs, maybe a better screen, so don't know if it's actually worth waiting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
'Similar', I think a more heavier word like ' better ' would have fitted into the line, sgs3 is rumoured to have a 2.0 quad core(4 cores) processor and 1.5gb ram( rumoured by many big tech news sites like engadget.com,thisismynext.com,phonearena.com,gsmarena.com),also a 10mp camera is rumoured at back, and a 5mp ffcamera is rumoured ( just read that in 1 article so the news is not so strong and dependable).
And I don't think 'bigger screen size' means bigger phones, if you compare sgs2 international version and sgs2 hd (korean) version then the latter one has a way bigger screen but if you see the lower button pannel, you will notice the buttons have been made smaller and wider so that the device is still not that big and is still just a notch bigger than original sgs2's 'body size'. ;-)
hit thankxx if i helped. sent from my mind through telepathy (ya its possible)!
i put galaxy note but like the galaxy s 2 white as i can upgrade ar lassers phone and give her my galaxy s then in 6 mounths upgrade the galaxy s to some thing new
BHuvan goyal said:
Haha, sgs 2 has the best gpu in any android 'device'(not only phones) in the whole world - the mali-400 which is nearly 3 time better than sgs's gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm I remember it not being very impressive in the early benchmarks, barely beating the SGS and losing to tegra2. They did say it could be early drivers though. I'd love to see recent comparisons but nobody seems to be doing them.
Waiting for nexus 3.
Love the ota updates on my nexus one. Galaxy S has been my best device to date though and I'm in no hurry to upgrade.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
SII LTE HD. Bigger screen with 720p would be enough to justify a switch, and there is better cpu, camera, more RAM, etc...
Still got 9 months to go on my 2 year contract so looking like s3 for me!
Sent from my Galaxy S using XDA Premium App
If the Note and SGS2 LTE HD are available end of this year I'll buy the cheapest. Love the i9000 but I think it's time for a refresh.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
haloimplant said:
Hm I remember it not being very impressive in the early benchmarks, barely beating the SGS and losing to tegra2. They did say it could be early drivers though. I'd love to see recent comparisons but nobody seems to be doing them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look on Anandtech. The Mali 400 is almost as good as the SGX540, the Tegra2 and the Adreno 220.... combined!
LTE will likely be the catalyst to get a new phone. Aside from the fact that the technology is quicker, there will be less people using it.
And you can't go past a phone with 720p!
Retina display.. psft...
Where is the nexus prime in that list?
BlackDino said:
Where is the nexus prime in that list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also miss that option.
I choose first option. Maybe latter collect money and buy Galaxy 3
Ill take my original SGS with my 1650mah Samsung Armani battery (same physical size as stock) over the SGSII.
If the SGSII was the same physical size as the SGS and had better battery, I would buy it in a heartbeat...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i m going to buy the dual core phone but guys i dont have any idea that which dual core phone is best
i want gaming modding roms camera form phone so please guid me which one is best except latest release of smasung galaxy nexus and motorola razr
Why would you want the next best? Get the Galaxy Nexus.
If you're just about saving a few quid, and assuming you specifically want an Android handset pick up the galaxy s2... spec and performance is not far short overall, in some ways it's better.
HTC range? Seems to havegood support here.
Samsung Galaxy SII
In terms of specs/potential it is Note..in terms of specs/xda support it is GNexus.
REZOUND!
HTC Rezound is my pick.
Dual Core Qualcom MSM8660 with 1.5 GHz, 1GB of RAM and the best thing about the phone - 720P 4.3 Inch Display!!! better pixel density than even the retina.
i think Mi-One is the best choice atm but he's pretty hard to find...
Shenkoa said:
HTC Rezound is my pick.
Dual Core Qualcom MSM8660 with 1.5 GHz, 1GB of RAM and the best thing about the phone - 720P 4.3 Inch Display!!! better pixel density than even the retina.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not enough hardware to drive it
The SGS2. one of the best dual core chips and its going to have ice cream sandwich soon.
The super AMOLED screen is superb too.
Sent from my E10i using XDA App
SGS II
My friend got one recently and I checked it out. SGS II is really good. It is definitely well equipped to handle ICS if you are interested in flashing CM 9, when the good folks come out with it.
I haven't 100% decided which phone I'm going to get yet either (between Nexus Prime, Razr, and Resound), though I'm leaning towards the Nexus Prime just because I know it will be the most open. I'm more than likely going to want Cyanogen on whatever I get. The Razr, though water and bullet proof, will probably be the most locked down out of the three :/
S2 /lock.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
No, thanks, but I'll be getting a N9.
galaxy s2 >>> galaxy nexus
I'm more of an HTC fan myself, who's you're carrier? Are you gonna start a new contract? The galaxy has a very vivid display but it really depends on who you go through on what phone to pick;-)
HTC EVO 3d
Sent from my Nocturnal E3D using xda premium
I'm having a tough time picking between the new RAZR and the SGS II. I guess I'll have to go play with them both again.
GNexus for sure.
I would go for the Galaxy Nexus for sure. It may not have the most ram or the highest MP camera, but it is a high quality build and scores very well in benchmarks.
We'll have to see when the S2 gets a good working ROM though as ICS is fully optimized for dual cores with hardware acceleration.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
So what is it? I'm switching carriers soon and would like to know who to switch to. I'm really asking in terms of speed, screen clarity, and the overall cool factor.
Also, could you be specific as to why? You know, specs, etc.
best
bluu tango search it on google
or LG optimus one
or coby kyros or huawei ideos
they are the best!
The Samsung Galaxy SII.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
I thought the galaxy nexus was better
opera38205 said:
bluu tango search it on google
or LG optimus one
or coby kyros or huawei ideos
they are the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really, Talking seriously?!?! mid-low 2011 spec phones better than 2012 flagships phone specs?!?! really?!?!
cweezyf said:
I thought the galaxy nexus was better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the best phone out there would be right now the galaxy s2, this is why:
-Exynos 1.2 gHz processor: much better than qualcomm no matter what (surpassed maybe by the S4 or the Tegra 3 but not yet released)
-Better 8 mp camera: The sensors used by this camera are excellent (maybe only surpassed by the iPhone 4S sensors).
-Mali 400 GPU: One of the best gpu existing today in the market only found in a couple of phones (again maybe only surpassed by the nonreleased chip of the MWC)
-Super Lightweight: One of the lightest phone that some may say it feels cheap but dont
-Super Thin: One of the thinnest phone today only surpassed by the RAZR and other unknown phones.
-Super Amoled Plus screen: Wonderful screen with surprising colors that amaze everyone and with its plus technology it makes a more resolution effect although its only 800x480
this would be some of the reasons of why to choose it
here are my two cents hope it helps, thank if i helped
*GalaxyDev* said:
Really, Talking seriously?!?! mid-low 2011 spec phones better than 2012 flagships phone specs?!?! really?!?!
No, the best phone out there would be right now the galaxy s2, this is why:
-Exynos 1.2 gHz processor: much better than qualcomm no matter what (surpassed maybe by the S4 or the Tegra 3 but not yet released)
-Better 8 mp camera: The sensors used by this camera are excellent (maybe only surpassed by the iPhone 4S sensors).
-Mali 400 GPU: One of the best gpu existing today in the market only found in a couple of phones (again maybe only surpassed by the nonreleased chip of the MWC)
-Super Lightweight: One of the lightest phone that some may say it feels cheap but dont
-Super Thin: One of the thinnest phone today only surpassed by the RAZR and other unknown phones.
-Super Amoled Plus screen: Wonderful screen with surprising colors that amaze everyone and with its plus technology it makes a more resolution effect although its only 800x480
this would be some of the reasons of why to choose it
here are my two cents hope it helps, thank if i helped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to agree here. While I do agree the SII is better (yeah I'm a GNex owner and my butt is a bit hurt from it) I don't see the margin of difference terribly large. The GNex is still an outstanding phone.
how much is "soon"?
If I was in your shoes, I would prob wait for Samsung galaxy S3.
I agree the international version of S2 is the best, the galaxy nexus does have a excellent screen, one of the best noise cancellation to be found on a phone. Top 3 android phones until Tegra 3 hits is Galaxy S2, Galaxy Nexus, Droid Razr Maxx.
Wait for GalaxyS3
I have a galaxy s and its amazing. I cant wait for the galaxy 3
Sony Xperia S, it's got a 12mp camera. The best in Android
This is 3vo CDMA (sprint) not GSM (tmo, att, or a carrier that gives a sim card)
EVO 3D. Even though 3D code is only for sense 3.0, the 3vo has quite possibly the best selection of rooms I have ever seen. So far we have:
1. AOSP
2. CM7
3. Sense 3.0
4. Sense 3.5
5. Sense 3.6 (work in progress, or wip)
6. Sense 4.0 (wip)
7. Evo view 4g sense (tablet rom on 3vo)
8. ICS 4.0.3 (only issue is camera)
9. CM9 (same as ics)
And maybe more.!
Not to mention our various tweaks, amazing quadrant scores, dual core processor, 1.5 gHz STABLE over clock with good battery life still (we can go up to 1.8 but its unstable and can pretty much destroy your phone), dedicated developers, qHD screen, and soooooo much more. You should check us out
Plus, with the recent hboot downgrade ability, our phone is now "unofficially unbrickable" which means I can do ANYTHING to it and I can restore it. This phone, even with a select number of issues, is by far the strongest competitor in specs, deving, performance, etc.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I feel it is the galaxy note international version (the non snapdragon version) with its 1.4ghz cpu. Granted the new gen of SoC tech will be better than this but as far as current day is concerned I feel galaxy note is the best. Granted some people hate the huge screen and I understand that but the big hi res screen is just too great to me.
SGS2.
Sent From My SGA via Xda Premium App
Optimus one is good for developers and advanced user
However, a r m v 6
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA
FinancialWar said:
Sony Xperia S, it's got a 12mp camera. The best in Android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tbh.. The 12mp doesnt look great. Took far better photos with my GS2.
As everyone pointed out..go with the Galaxy S2. The S3 will be out towards end of this year and it will be a beast...but the S2 will still be one of the top phones for at least another year.
Sent from my Nokia 3210 using xda premium.
Xperia S, best screen on the market, of all phones (including iPhone). Unlockable bootloader and ROM development support by Sony.
Nexus S. We have lots of great devs, roms, and kernels.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
*GalaxyDev* said:
No, the best phone out there would be right now the galaxy s2, this is why:
-Exynos 1.2 gHz processor: much better than qualcomm no matter what (surpassed maybe by the S4 or the Tegra 3 but not yet released)
-Better 8 mp camera: The sensors used by this camera are excellent (maybe only surpassed by the iPhone 4S sensors).
-Mali 400 GPU: One of the best gpu existing today in the market only found in a couple of phones (again maybe only surpassed by the nonreleased chip of the MWC)
-Super Lightweight: One of the lightest phone that some may say it feels cheap but dont
-Super Thin: One of the thinnest phone today only surpassed by the RAZR and other unknown phones.
-Super Amoled Plus screen: Wonderful screen with surprising colors that amaze everyone and with its plus technology it makes a more resolution effect although its only 800x480
this would be some of the reasons of why to choose it
here are my two cents hope it helps, thank if i helped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a couple points. The galaxy nexus doesn't use a Qualcomm processor. It uses a TI OMAP. If the Exynos is better, it isn't by much.
The GPU is a PowerVR which is probably weaker than the Mali but still decent. It runs Grand Theft Auto III really well, which is the most demanding thing I'd ever do on a phone GPU wise.
The screen on the Nexus is also AMOLED but full 720p (1280×720) instead of the 800X480 on the S2. It is pentile but the resoultion is so much higher it more than makes up for it. This is clearly a winner for the Nexus IMO.
Also the real pros in buying a Nexus:
Faster official updates and completely stock ICS (no touchwiz, sense, motoblur, etc)
Xperia nominated?
FinancialWar said:
Sony Xperia S, it's got a 12mp camera. The best in Android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sony may not have the most cutting edge tech in their phones, but I know they are polished quite well. It was Sony Xperia S coming with GB, not ICS that held it back in my mind. Any ways it will update eventually. Please check out my thread, its a discussion of a similar manner.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1561464
Is there really any competition with these phones or does one blow away the other hands down?
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA Premium App
Well since we have no idea what the official specs of the SGS3 are we can't really say. All we have is rumors, but some of the thing we can be fairly certain about are the exynos quad processor, a 720p screen, an 8-10MP camera,and a screen size ranging from 4.5-4.8". The main difference will be the processor and the screen size. If you want a hybrid phone/tablet the note will be best, if you are looking for pure performance then the S3 will give you the best results. You can't say one will blow the other one out of the water without solid spec sheets and an idea of what you want in the phone.
I am excited for Thursday. I hope that we don't only hear about the SGS3, but maybe some intel on when the TMobile version of the Note will be released.
I am going for the Note. Buying an international version is not an option for me financially, so it rules out these quad-core processors, which are probably not needed right now anyway.
I am still using a TMobile G2, and it does everything I need it to do. It only has 1 core I am sure at like 800 mhz, though I am overclocking it right now due to the fact that it makes it easier to run. Either way, that processor can't be as nice a the Galaxy Note's dual-core 1.5 ghz processor.
Quad cores are just being used in desktop computers really, so it's no surprise that you shouldn't really NEED it for a phone. I don't know the official technicalities to backup my statement, but it seems common sense.
I will look forward to having the GNote specific applications, S pen, and screen real estate. Can't wait!
S3. Only reason to get Note over GS2 is screen/pen. Not worth it imo.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Not a fair competition at all. S3 should be compared to phones of the same calibre, like the HTC One X.
im sure someone will do a competition of these two phones. Even whitout the S3 full specs we all know who will win.
Quadcore is more than necessary for me
One phone!
HTC Evo Lte dual core s4 which is really fast.. It beats tegra 3 in some tests.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
i think the SG S3 will be the same as the Note ( pen included ) but with a 4.6 screen
Each have their pluses and minuses. The GS3 will have the latest and greatest hardware and ICS out if the box, but the Note will have the bigger screen and S-Pen.
But seriously you're considering a phone already 6 months old vs a phone that will just be announced tomorrow. I love my Note and it has worked flawlessly for me, but I know after tomorrow it won't be the best hardware wise compared to the GS3. But that doesn't mean the Note is a slouch at all. The good thing though is I have my work phone with Sprint and my upgrade is June 30, so I may pick up the GS3, so best of both worlds!
Sent from my GT-N7000 Samsung Galaxy Note "Go big or go home" using XDA app
Galaxy s3 is way more better
Sent From Galaxy Far Far Away
webjunky said:
i think the SG S3 will be the same as the Note ( pen included ) but with a 4.6 screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S3 will most likely have a 4.8 screen
..Can't wait for SIII
IiI can relate to the question I have a gsii and I really lobe the note. I will wait to deer what the new galaxy offers this weekend. I live near the brand new Samsung shop in Westfield next to the Olympic site and they reckon that the should have demo models this Saturday following the event tonight.
I only wish there were a gnote2 being announced. I love the idea of stylus
and big screen.
I have high expectations for GS3. Let's see what they have to offer for us today.
Anyway, I like my GS2 better than Galaxy Note already, so it seams clear to me that GS3 will also be better.
hummm, i like Galaxy S III better.
How do you like HUA WEI Ascend P1
BTW, I'm still waiting for media pad 10 fhd of HUA WEI
There will be quite a big difference according to the specs!
Well we will see at 7pm today
The SGS3 will be more popular than the Note, because the SGS3 is the direct concurrention of the HTC One X, iPhone etcetera.
If a phone gets really popular, you get extra things from the producer, like firmware upgrades etcetera.
Pick SGS3 after 7pm.
PS it is being expected the SGS3 will arive at the stores in approx 7 days
hahaha note vs a quadcore baby doesnt stand a chance find out today at 7:00pm GMT London time
according to leaked specs the s3 will have a 12mp camera a 4412 quadcore processor clocked at 1.5ghz
a mali 400(same as in the s2 just clocked much higher)
a 4.8 inch 720p HD regular RGB matrix not pentile
wireless charging (big maybe wuold be cool but unlikely)
2mp front cam
touchwiz bullcrap on android 4.0.4
a ceramic back
we all will know in few hours time ~~~ *wait patiently*
bananalow said:
we all will know in few hours time ~~~ *wait patiently*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WAIT PATIENTLY !!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO IS GONNA DO THAT I WANT MY SIII NOW
Should I get a
(AT&T)
1. Galaxy note
2. OneX(s in my country)
( has no micro SD therefore off my list)
( no quad core)
3.wait for quad core phone like the
>Atrix 3 duel core 1.2 ghz... ( ugh) (not cool)
>galaxy s3
I have an upgrade .
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Haha Lmao Lml Yay Lol Hehe Hoho Hihi
Are You Only Looking At Those Options Or Are You Open Minded To Other Options That Have Similar Specs?
S3 by far
AT&T One X is a piece of sh*t. Go for Galaxy S3.
Mariacci said:
AT&T One X is a piece of sh*t. Go for Galaxy S3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I was looking at as well or the note / atrix 3 . I like the notes size but I think waiting for quad core might be a good idea
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
....also think Samsung Galaxy SIII or HTC ONE S ;-)
s3, if its anything like my captivate, that thing will be awesome
Definitely looking at the galaxy s3
Is it running quad core tegra 3 ? Or something else?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
I prefer the S3. I've heard its zippy, fast and overall better than the One X. The Note still remains a good choice, despite having a weaker processor, but it has a large screen, so its all a matter of preference.
Overall, if you're looking for a good experience, choose the international quad core version of the S3.
On a side note, I don't think AT&T will carry the quad core version of the S3, only the dual core Snapdragon S4 version. The quad core version is international, so you would have to buy it upfront. The upgrade you have would probably get you a USA dual core Galaxy S3.
vx117 said:
I prefer the S3. I've heard its zippy, fast and overall better than the One X. The Note still remains a good choice, despite having a weaker processor, but it has a large screen, so its all a matter of preference.
Overall, if you're looking for a good experience, choose the international quad core version of the S3.
On a side note, I don't think AT&T will carry the quad core version of the S3, only the dual core Snapdragon S4 version. The quad core version is international, so you would have to buy it upfront. The upgrade you have would probably get you a USA dual core Galaxy S3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch.... that is a lot of cash to shell out, I may end up just waiting. Because if I go duel core I may as well go note. I have my transformer prime...so I almost NEED quad now just to feel like I upgraded
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
ianwardell said:
Definitely looking at the galaxy s3
Is it running quad core tegra 3 ? Or something else?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung S3 is running Samsung Exynos Quad @1.5 Ghz and it rapes Tegra 3. Avoid the dual core one.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
Go to a store and hold the phones in your hand .. gaze at the screens ...run a few tasks/games ...test the cameras right then and there..check how loud it gets ...
..And you would know
---------- Post added at 02:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:09 PM ----------
I would suggest Galaxy S3 , it'll keep yourself future-phone-proof for sometime .. My Mom's original galaxy s still runs hassle free. I need a good looking phone with a good feel in hand and hence I went with HTC One X
you can try galaxy s3..For me its the best
unfortunately, it seems that SGS3 will be released in North America with a dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4. so I do not understand how it will be an improvement from SGS2...
may be I am missing some technical details and Snapdragon S4 is incredibly fast and powerful, but somehow I doubt that.
I kind of knew that they would not release quad-core S3 in NA. normally, all the good smartphones somehow manage to by-pass North American market.
for instance, it is a mystery to me why Samsung Omnia HD was never released in US or Canada.
As for the Galaxy Note, somehow I have doubts about its processing speed as almost all hardware specs are copied from SGS2. how come a phone with a screen almost twice the size of SGS2 and same hardware specs can operate just as smooth as SGS2 does?
ianwardell said:
Ouch.... that is a lot of cash to shell out, I may end up just waiting. Because if I go duel core I may as well go note. I have my transformer prime...so I almost NEED quad now just to feel like I upgraded
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quad core doesn't mean it's faster or better. The quadcore exynos 4412 is a 32nm chooser with A9 cortex instructions. Dualcore S4 is 28nm A15 structure. A15 is a huge improvement over A9. Plus the sg3 in states has 2 gigs of ram. If you have enough patience wait for the next nexus
I don't think you can really tell the difference between these chipsets anymore. They're all too fast.
crolikman said:
unfortunately, it seems that SGS3 will be released in North America with a dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4. so I do not understand how it will be an improvement from SGS2...
may be I am missing some technical details and Snapdragon S4 is incredibly fast and powerful, but somehow I doubt that.
I kind of knew that they would not release quad-core S3 in NA. normally, all the good smartphones somehow manage to by-pass North American market.
for instance, it is a mystery to me why Samsung Omnia HD was never released in US or Canada.
As for the Galaxy Note, somehow I have doubts about its processing speed as almost all hardware specs are copied from SGS2. how come a phone with a screen almost twice the size of SGS2 and same hardware specs can operate just as smooth as SGS2 does?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is my basic understanding of chipsets. Exynos quad> Qualcomm Krait = Tegra 3 = Exynos Dual Core 2.0 ghz > TI OMAP Dual core.
Now,exynos chipset doesn't support 4G LTE network (it maxes out at 21mbps) but qualcomm does ( the reason Sony uses them)
Samsung value their international market,where they are more popular comparatively. LTE isnt widespread outside USA so they dont see need in equiping their international sets with a feature people wont use. The solution then,is to give the few carriers with LTE an LTE version of the phone,relatively few units,and cost save.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
go for the S3 i would to buy ONE X but the camera is **** (i mean the compression or or whatever it's called) the photos taken on ONE X are good but if u upload it to the pc its low or ****y quality so i advice u to go for the S3 or maybe a Nokia
Razr Maxx for the battey 3300 mAh.
Ok I'll say it.
The Best Option is have someone else Pay for it......
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium