Related
In the market for an upgrade, currently have a HTC Desire running CM7 and it's great, no lag in everyday use, OC'd to 1.1ghz, the only thing is that the graphics aren't great due to the outdated Adreno 200 GPU. I get higher Quadrant figures than my gf's Galaxy S but my phone is a joke in the graphics test compared to the samsung.
So for me the real limitation is the GPU and I want the best available product this time
The phones I had in mind (and in order of preference) are:
Samsung Galaxy S II (Mali-400 MP) (480x800)
HTC Evo 3D (Adreno 220) (540x960)
LG Optimus 3D (SGX 540) (480x800)
Motorola Atrix 4G (ULP GeForce) (540x960)
Anandtech benchmark on OC'd adreno 220, sgx 540 & geforce
Anandtech benchmark on mali-400 mp
Based partly on the benchmarks and lots and lots of forum/thread searching, my guess is Mali-400 MP > SGX 540 > Adreno 220 > GeForce ULP, is that about right?
What do you guys think is the best and what should I go for?
Extra Q.. is the SGX 543 expected in any android devices yet? Google brings up nothing
nop... wrong
SGX 543 = Adreno 220 >> Mali -400 >> Geforce ULP [tegra 2] >> SGX 540 >> Adreno 205 >> SGX 535 >> Adreno 200 = SGX 530
m nt sure but as per my knowledge Adreno 220 is more powerful which is going to release in Evo 3d and Sensation...
I m planning to buy Htc sensation soon....
EDIT :- Correction of mali-400 position..... [and even i am not sure about adreno 220 ]
[even my xperia runs on adreno 200 ..... cravin for good gpu too]
neelpatel007 said:
Adreno 220 >> Geforce ULP [tegra 2] >> SGX 540 = Mali -400 >> Adreno 205 >> SGX 535 >> Adreno 200 = SGX 530
m nt sure but as per my knowledge Adreno 220 is more powerful which is going to release in Evo 3d and Sensation...
I m planning to buy Htc sensation soon....
[even my xperia runs on adreno 200 ..... cravin for good gpu too]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep,that's about right.I have a Desire HD and am going to buy the Sensation when it hits the market.
One a couple of things though.First,he SGX 540 in the LG Optimus 2X is an overclocked version of the one in the Galaxy S.Second,by looking at these benchmarks it's unfair for the Geforce and the Adreno 220,because the Atrix and Evo 3D/Sensation have a resolution of 960x540 as opposed to 800x480 of the others,as is written in the OP.That is 35% more pixels which makes things harder for the GPU.
sorry for the question but what does gpu do?
Just said:
sorry for the question but what does gpu do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Accelerates graphics and lets you play games smoothly (Graphics Processing Unit). Unless you're an avid mobile gamer, any of the newer ones are just fine.
But why would Samsung switch from the SGX540 used in the Galaxy S to the Mali-400 MP in Galaxy S2 if it wasn't better. I know comparing qHD screens to the WVGA screens is slightly unfair but I've heard the Galaxy S2's S-AMOLED+ display is one of the best on the market.
In addition, why would Samsung use the Exynos SoC as opposed to the Tegra2 if it weren't as good
the optimus 3d beats the optimus 2x in the benchmarks so i think it's fair to say sgx540 is better than tegra/geforce
viva.fidel said:
But why would Samsung switch from the SGX540 used in the Galaxy S to the Mali-400 MP in Galaxy S2 if it wasn't better. I know comparing qHD screens to the WVGA screens is slightly unfair but I've heard the Galaxy S2's S-AMOLED+ display is one of the best on the market.
In addition, why would Samsung use the Exynos SoC as opposed to the Tegra2 if it weren't as good
the optimus 3d beats the optimus 2x in the benchmarks so i think it's fair to say sgx540 is better than tegra/geforce
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly my point,Samsung didn't change to a worse GPU.The Optimus 3D uses an overclocked version of the SGX540.I think that,if they were running at the same frequencies,the Mali would outperform it,but we can't be sure.
Bottom line?If you want hardcore gaming,go for either Adreno 220 or Geforce ULP.The others are just fine.
Remember benchmarks arent everything, and samsung is uping to 1.2ghz each core. Anyways I like htc so ill stick to mytouches and htc so mytouch 4g slide for me
http://pocketnow.com/android/t-mobile-mytouch-4g-slide-htc-doubleshot-full-specs
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
tolis626 said:
That's exactly my point,Samsung didn't change to a worse GPU.The Optimus 3D uses an overclocked version of the SGX540.I think that,if they were running at the same frequencies,the Mali would outperform it,but we can't be sure.
Bottom line?If you want hardcore gaming,go for either Adreno 220 or Geforce ULP.The others are just fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, yeah I looked into this and the Optimus 3D uses SGX540 @ 300mhz with an updated driver compare to the SGS @ 200 mhz
Guess I'm just gonna have to wait until a few more benchmarks emerge of the Mali as anandtech's were using a prototype device.
Wow, They're fast. The 220 hitting 90fps when my Z only gets 25
viva.fidel said:
Hey, yeah I looked into this and the Optimus 3D uses SGX540 @ 300mhz with an updated driver compare to the SGS @ 200 mhz
Guess I'm just gonna have to wait until a few more benchmarks emerge of the Mali as anandtech's were using a prototype device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See?Told 'ya!
Anyway,I tend to believe that the new generations strongest beast(They are all beasts after all)is the Adreno 220.Couple it with the fact that the GPU gets overclocked together with the CPU(Integrated),if you overclock it at a healthy frequency(1.8GHz anyone? Yeah,I'm THAT mad!)you will get dreamy performance.
Anyway,the Sensation's benchmarks are just from prototypes,so we have yet to see its true potential.
Sure thing is they are all very damn fast,and everything will be even faster when multi-core optimized apps hit the market.Until then we can only sit back and enjoy the show.I for one am torn between the Galaxy S 2 and the Sensation.Which one I'll get?Dunno yet.If it wasn't for the Super Amoled + screen I wouldn't even be thinking about it,but the screen on those things is damn beautiful.On the other hand,the Sensation has qHD screen...Why,oh why are they so expensive?I'd get both otherwise!
tolis626 said:
See?Told 'ya!
Anyway,I tend to believe that the new generations strongest beast(They are all beasts after all)is the Adreno 220.Couple it with the fact that the GPU gets overclocked together with the CPU(Integrated),if you overclock it at a healthy frequency(1.8GHz anyone? Yeah,I'm THAT mad!)you will get dreamy performance.
Anyway,the Sensation's benchmarks are just from prototypes,so we have yet to see its true potential.
Sure thing is they are all very damn fast,and everything will be even faster when multi-core optimized apps hit the market.Until then we can only sit back and enjoy the show.I for one am torn between the Galaxy S 2 and the Sensation.Which one I'll get?Dunno yet.If it wasn't for the Super Amoled + screen I wouldn't even be thinking about it,but the screen on those things is damn beautiful.On the other hand,the Sensation has qHD screen...Why,oh why are they so expensive?I'd get both otherwise!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a DesireHD owner myself, im on the same boat as you my friend. My only gripe with the sgs2 is the non qhd res screen and comparatively weak gpu, especially how their last gen sgs gpu was miles ahead of everyone else. There's also the option to get the tegra2 powered sgs2, but i think that one does not have samoled+ display, also im not sure if the tegra2 unit will be OC'd to 1.2. Im seriously considering now the evo 3d gsm, but not only does it have no built in memory but its coming out later and sgs 2 is already out.
Benchmark: Mali 400 (Samsung S II) > Adreno 220 (HTC Sensation)
"Smartbench 2011 is one of the few synthetic benchmark tests that are able to measure multicore performance, so these results are for both CPU cores at work. The Samsung Galaxy S II steadily beats the HTC Pyramid in both the productivity (3732 vs 1898 points), and GPU tests (2431 vs 1426 points)."
But it also notes:
"Bear in mind that the Galaxy S II that the test was run on, seems to be the final version, with the 1.2GHz Exynos chipset, and the HTC Pyramid was the internal name of the HTC Sensation when it was still a prototype, so we’ll wait for the retail version to pass judgement on the 1.2Ghz Snapdragon chipset inside."
Mali seems to be doing pretty damn good.
http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedet...2&testgroup=overall&benchmark=glpro20&var=top
And what matters is real life performance. See any vid of the galaxy s 2 and its buttery smooth, even while playing hd flash in the browser.
tolis626 said:
See?Told 'ya!
Anyway,I tend to believe that the new generations strongest beast(They are all beasts after all)is the Adreno 220.Couple it with the fact that the GPU gets overclocked together with the CPU(Integrated),if you overclock it at a healthy frequency(1.8GHz anyone? Yeah,I'm THAT mad!)you will get dreamy performance.
Anyway,the Sensation's benchmarks are just from prototypes,so we have yet to see its true potential.
Sure thing is they are all very damn fast,and everything will be even faster when multi-core optimized apps hit the market.Until then we can only sit back and enjoy the show.I for one am torn between the Galaxy S 2 and the Sensation.Which one I'll get?Dunno yet.If it wasn't for the Super Amoled + screen I wouldn't even be thinking about it,but the screen on those things is damn beautiful.On the other hand,the Sensation has qHD screen...Why,oh why are they so expensive?I'd get both otherwise!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The qHD display isn't really that much sharper than the Super Amoled Plus display, but it decreases performance.
And the Super Amoled also has: Better colors, totally black (also saves power), 1ms response (good when you watch movies), 180 degree, viewing angle, and responds better you your touches.
Did I mention that it was thin?
Also the Exynos Chip is stronger.
I belive that the CPU is customized by Intrisity, but I can't confirm that.
And the Mali-400MP will probably get better drivers. (not that it would lag anyway )
Galaxy S 2 is also thinner.
I think it's the best choice.
HTC Sensation is awesome, but Galaxy S 2 is the best phone on the market.
But on one final note: I recommend that you wait for the Nexus 3 that comes around Christmas.
It's rumored to have the Tegra 3 chip inside (quad-core).
tolis626 said:
On the other hand,the Sensation has qHD screen...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But PenTile Display...
Since I know this the Sensation was also one candidate for me along with the S2.
But now the S2 will be my next phone after my desire, I guess.
Hi
Even I changed my mind from HTC sensation to SGS2 .... after watching such a low benchmark performance of HTC sensation see it here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RHziztN2gs
And after watching the superb clearity of SuperAMOLED display , against HTC's blurry screen ,,,,,... m in love with SGS2......
See it here... http://www.youtube.com/user/SlashGear?ob=5#p/u/0/p3axSZX1R_s
I dont know what that HTC people did with Adreno 220 n i have no clue why it's benchmarks are low......
So all time Sensation lover has now moved to SGS2 .... SGS2 rocks....
See the FPS in the second video , SGS2 is far better in 2D n 3D performance too..... HTC s**ckin big time.... big disappointment....
mali 400 < sgx 540 < ulp < adreno 220
mali is best but problem is some games are only compatible with tegra's ULP
any pc modder knows resolution is a huge tax on graphics. benchmarks dont mean much at different resolutions, not to mention frame rate caps. mali might have a slight edge on adreno in a fair test, but not enough to swing a decision i dont think. screen and build quality will be the biggest variance. imo htc wins build quality, and higher res screen is better for text/browsing. Samsung's lower res (and crazy good looking) screen will always lead to higher frame rates, so they win for games/ vids. Ill be getting the sensation the day its released (work for tmob, decision was kinda made for me)
bobbymokie said:
any pc modder knows resolution is a huge tax on graphics. benchmarks dont mean much at different resolutions, not to mention frame rate caps. mali might have a slight edge on adreno in a fair test, but not enough to swing a decision i dont think. screen and build quality will be the biggest variance. imo htc wins build quality, and higher res screen is better for text/browsing. Samsung's lower res (and crazy good looking) screen will always lead to higher frame rates, so they win for games/ vids. Ill be getting the sensation the day its released (work for tmob, decision was kinda made for me)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you give details on the mytouch 4g slide?
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk
2048 x 1536 pixels
.....
That is the MAX VGA resolution is it not? Am I the only one who is seeing this or is this just a quirky thing....
I really don't believe that the thing has that insane high resolution...something just irks me about the thing.
How the "hell" does that mobile gpu handle the resolution without lagging up a ****storm.......I want to know.....I don't however want that its powered by fairy dust
I mean the device only has 1gb of ram........where does it get its video memory? that res would eat up memory like craxy
....fairy....d..u...s..
t
Its hella strange.
Hit THANKS if I helped u
I held both the iPad 2 and 3 in my hands today. When browsing the Internet the difference is minimal (more stuff on page) but it does help when reading text book/email as you get to see more at better clarity.
Overall not such a big deal and Android tablets will get this res soon enough.
devilsrogue said:
2048 x 1536 pixels
.....
That is the MAX VGA resolution is it not? Am I the only one who is seeing this or is this just a quirky thing....
I really don't believe that the thing has that insane high resolution...something just irks me about the thing.
How the "hell" does that mobile gpu handle the resolution without lagging up a ****storm.......I want to know.....I don't however want that its powered by fairy dust
I mean the device only has 1gb of ram........where does it get its video memory? that res would eat up memory like craxy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's just good software engineering, something Apple is darned good at. The 1Gb of ram is enough for a device that does not multitask in the same way android does.
I don't think other manufacturers can produce such very high resolution in small inch like ipad3 within this 2 years.
Apple is insane, pitty that it is not android.
Sent from my GT-I9100
Nothing strange at all. Already iPad 2 has a huge GPU, but iPad 3 has an even larger GPU, iPad 3 uses an PowerVR SGX543MP4 and the complete SOC measures 162 mm2, that is twice as large and basically twice as expensive as an Tegra 3!
That GPU is basically 4 times as powerful as PowerVR SGX540 GPU, i e the GPU in Galaxy Nexus. But iPad has lower clock than Galaxy Nexus though.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5685/apple-a5x-die-size-measured-16294mm2-likely-still-45nm
Apple can afford such big SOC because iPad are expensive and also because of all the money the get from app-sales.
But that SOC is probably not working in an iPhone, they need a new more power efficient SOC made on 28/32 nm for iPhone 5.
It's all in the design. The way the A5/A5X SOCs are designed, they really do a better job of pushing the limits on what is possible with the specs. The A5/X is just that good of a design that they can run 512mb/1gb ram and be lag free. And also the way in which Apple handles multitasking.
dakpluto said:
It's all in the design. The way the A5/A5X SOCs are designed, they really do a better job of pushing the limits on what is possible with the specs. The A5/X is just that good of a design that they can run 512mb/1gb ram and be lag free. And also the way in which Apple handles multitasking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the GPU in A5/A5x is not more efficient or better designed than GPU's in Android phones, it is just more powerful because it has many more calculation units/transistors (more expensive).
In fact many Android phones uses the same architecture in their GPU's but with 1/4th of the calculation units in A5x.
Hope this pushes all other companies to increase screen resolutions.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
9.5 MB
2048 x 1536 x 3 bytes = 9.5 MB. And in most cases an image that big will be compressed in DRAM. 1GB is plenty.
However, refreshing the screen with that much data 30 or more times/second could consume a lot of the DRAM bandwidth. Those 4 CPU cores may slow down when displaying a full-size image. (Not that it'd matter - quad core on a tablet is mostly a marketing gimmick. They're not doing anything a single slower core couldn't handle just as well.)
dragon135 said:
I don't think other manufacturers can produce such very high resolution in small inch like ipad3 within this 2 years.
Apple is insane, pitty that it is not android.
Sent from my GT-I9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought there is a 2560x1600res 11.6" tablet coming in the form of 10.1" this year from samsung with a15 based exynos5
Higher resolutions are nice, but they should be useful. 2560*1600 sounds nice, but if everything will be unreadably small, there's no use in having such a resolution.
However, I do think it's strange Apple sticks to 4:3 resolutions even though their devices are shaped differently...
Got problem to choose between s2 n nexus.. What phone do you prefer n why
Sent from my phone via my mind
For me S2... They are very similar-...
Ave666 said:
Got problem to choose between s2 n nexus.. What phone do you prefer n why
Sent from my phone via my mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Post this in Android General or Android Q&A Thread. You will get plenty of good answers there. This is a phone specific forum and you should not post here about any other phones.
Anyways, Nexus will be the best (I think). Stock android experience is what you will never forget about the nexus.
a short comparision bw Samsung galaxy s2(i9100 not i9100g) and galaxy nexus
CPU(both have dual core)
the s2 has Exynos(samsung's own cpu) 4210 @1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
the nexus has Texas Instruments(TI) OMAP4460 @ 1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
both run at 1.2 ghz but the nexus is undercloked to save battery , it can run at 1.5 ghz
alo omap 4 has better power management features to its architecture and ti open source
Exynos 4210 runs at 1.2ghz but it is overclocked to 1.4ghz in galaxy note
so OMAP4460 should be better( better for performance if you overclock , on stock they both run at 1.2ghz , so should perform similarly in most scenarios)
GPU (comparision of both s2 and nexus with current and q2-q3 2012 devices)
the s2 Has Mali 400 which is quad core and should be better
in the galaxy nexus we have PowerVR SGX540 @ 384 MHz (Single Core) the same gpu which was originally found in galaxy s (i9000 PowerVR SGX540 @ 200 MHz) but at really high clock to improve performance , it is very good cpu but is aging .. getting old in the era of ulp geforce(found in tegra 3 and tegra 2 which are cpu) and Adreno 225 and 320 [found in Krait i.e.. Snapdragon s4(28 nm)-which is better and more powerfull cpu that even tegra 3]
in the graphic performance mali 400 is better as it is quad core but SGX540 is also good , in many cases mali 400 performes better and in some cases SGX540 performes better , due to different architectures
Screen
s2 has HD Super AMOLED Plus and nexus has HD Super AMOLED
galaxy nexus smokes s2 with its hd screen 1280x720 but with Pentile matrix arrangement(trust me its not noticible)
s2 has normal wvga 800x480 resolution wihout Pentlie Matrix
nexus has 4.65 screen and i s bigger than s2's 4.3 to watch videos)
Both have good connectivity wifi,gps ,bluetooth 3.0 with hs,3g with high speeds
physical buttons
galaxy nexus has no physical buutons (i dont like this) and at present not all apps are configured to advantage of it and u can sometimes find it irritating
also in nexus you do not have an onscreen menu button , as apps will have itself menu onscreen touch button
for eg.while playing an old version game either the onscreen buttons of nexus will not hide and you will not be able to take full advantage of large screen, or the buttons will hide and not come back when you pause the game
note that many apps are updated and updating for use with galaxy nexus
s2 has home , menu and back buttons
RAM
both have 1gb ram(enough for good usage)
CAmera
definetly the 8mp camera for s2 is better, it somkes galaxy nexus's 5mp
in video recording , both do 1080p but i think so that s2 does 1080p and nexus does [email protected] , so s2 is better
nexus has 1.3mp front camera which can do 720p , s2 has 2mp front camera
Battery
totally a personal issue(both have 1,750 mAh)
sdcard
nexus does not have sd slot(pls confirm),s2 has sd slot
tv out
s2 has tv out and usb on the go , nexus has tv out(pls confirm)
Software
both have Ice cream sandwhich , and hopefully s2 will get android 5(jellybean), nexus should 100% get jellybean
also nexus will update faster with ics versions as it google flagship device
UI
very personal
i personally never like cold and dark holo ui of ics , cm9 found on galaxy nexus, i think it lacks brightness and vivid colors
on s2 you have touchwiz 4 with some modifications in ics , it is bright and beautifull and i like it
akashsgpgi said:
a short comparision bw Samsung galaxy s2(i9100 not i9100g) and galaxy nexus
CPU(both have dual core)
the s2 has Exynos(samsung's own cpu) 4210 @1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
the nexus has Texas Instruments(TI) OMAP4460 @ 1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
both run at 1.2 ghz but the nexus is undercloked to save battery , it can run at 1.5 ghz
alo omap 4 has better power management features to its architecture and ti open source
Exynos 4210 runs at 1.2ghz but it is overclocked to 1.4ghz in galaxy note
so OMAP4460 should be better
GPU (comparision of both s2 and nexus with current and q2-q3 2012 devices)
the s2 Has Mali 400 which is quad core and should be better
in the galaxy nexus we have PowerVR SGX540 @ 384 MHz (Single Core) the same gpu which was originally found in galaxy s (i9000 PowerVR SGX540 @ 200 MHz) but at really high clock to improve performance , it is very good cpu but is aging .. getting old in the era of ulp geforce(found in tegra 3 and tegra 2 which are cpu) and Adreno 225 and 320 [found in Krait i.e.. Snapdragon s4(28 nm)-which is better and more powerfull cpu that even tegra 3]
in the graphic performance mali 400 is better as it is quad core but SGX540 is also good , in many cases mali 400 performes better and in some cases SGX540 performes better , due to different architectures
Screen
s2 has HD Super AMOLED Plus and nexus has HD Super AMOLED
galaxy nexus smokes s2 with its hd screen 1280x720 but with Pentile matrix arrangement(trust me its not noticible)
s2 has normal wvga 800x480 resolution wihout Pentlie Matrix
nexus has 4.65 screen and i s bigger than s2's 4.3 to watch videos)
Both have good connectivity wifi,gps ,bluetooth 3.0 with hs,3g with high speeds
physical buttons
galaxy nexus has no physical buutons (i dont like this) and at present not all apps are configured to advantage of it and u can sometimes find it irritating
also in nexus you do not have an onscreen menu button , as apps will have itself menu onscreen touch button
for eg.while playing an old version game either the onscreen buttons of nexus will not hide and you will not be able to take full advantage of large screen, or the buttons will hide and not come back when you pause the game
note that many apps are updated and updating for use with galaxy nexus
s2 has home , menu and back buttons
RAM
both have 1gb ram(enough for good usage)
CAmera
definetly the 8mp camera for s2 is better, it somkes galaxy nexus's 5mp
in video recording , both do 1080p but i think so that s2 does 1080p and nexus does [email protected] , so s2 is better
nexus has 1.3mp front camera which can do 720p , s2 has 2mp front camera
Battery
totally a personal issue(both have 1,750 mAh)
sdcard
nexus does not have sd slot(pls confirm),s2 has sd slot
tv out
s2 has tv out and usb on the go , nexus has tv out(pls confirm)
Software
both have Ice cream sandwhich , and hopefully s2 will get android 5(jellybean), nexus should 100% get jellybean
also nexus will update faster with ics versions as it google flagship device
UI
very personal
i personally never like cold and dark holo ui of ics , cm9 found on galaxy nexus, i think it lacks brightness and vivid colors
on s2 you have touchwiz 4 with some modifications in ics , it is bright and beautifull and i like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx a lot for the info u've given.. Btw, I read review about nexus batery were awful compared s2. Which is s2 of my frieds can last about over than 2 days
Sent from my phone via my mind
akashsgpgi said:
a short comparision bw Samsung galaxy s2(i9100 not i9100g) and galaxy nexus
Battery
totally a personal issue(both have 1,750 mAh)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the comparison. But I read that S2 has 1650 mAh battery. Also I read that CPU of s2 is better than CPU of galaxy nexus
Upgrade
Both are great phones... Your choice really depends in yourself... Before buying a new one... Reflect within yourself if it suites you right... You don't want to buy something that you would regret in the future.. Its best to get the full enjoyment from what you spent...
If you would ask me... I choose an SII... I wish I could upgrade my phone to SII like you... Before it runs out of trend that is....
SL development is quite strong these days (All thanks to dhiru)... Will stick to this phone for a while I think...
ALWAYS NEXUS !! nexus ftw man ! m telion u ! it'll even support the next android os jellybean cus of the HUUUGE dev support and fastest to receive google updates
go for s2
If you want to buy your phone now I'd choose the SGSII. I would wait for the SGSIII and parts of the other next gen phones.
akashsgpgi said:
a short comparision bw Samsung galaxy s2(i9100 not i9100g) and galaxy nexus
CPU(both have dual core)
the s2 has Exynos(samsung's own cpu) 4210 @1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
the nexus has Texas Instruments(TI) OMAP4460 @ 1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
both run at 1.2 ghz but the nexus is undercloked to save battery , it can run at 1.5 ghz
alo omap 4 has better power management features to its architecture and ti open source
Exynos 4210 runs at 1.2ghz but it is overclocked to 1.4ghz in galaxy note
so OMAP4460 should be better( better for performance if you overclock , on stock they both run at 1.2ghz , so should perform similarly in most scenarios)
GPU (comparision of both s2 and nexus with current and q2-q3 2012 devices)
the s2 Has Mali 400 which is quad core and should be better
in the galaxy nexus we have PowerVR SGX540 @ 384 MHz (Single Core) the same gpu which was originally found in galaxy s (i9000 PowerVR SGX540 @ 200 MHz) but at really high clock to improve performance , it is very good cpu but is aging .. getting old in the era of ulp geforce(found in tegra 3 and tegra 2 which are cpu) and Adreno 225 and 320 [found in Krait i.e.. Snapdragon s4(28 nm)-which is better and more powerfull cpu that even tegra 3]
in the graphic performance mali 400 is better as it is quad core but SGX540 is also good , in many cases mali 400 performes better and in some cases SGX540 performes better , due to different architectures
Screen
s2 has HD Super AMOLED Plus and nexus has HD Super AMOLED
galaxy nexus smokes s2 with its hd screen 1280x720 but with Pentile matrix arrangement(trust me its not noticible)
s2 has normal wvga 800x480 resolution wihout Pentlie Matrix
nexus has 4.65 screen and i s bigger than s2's 4.3 to watch videos)
Both have good connectivity wifi,gps ,bluetooth 3.0 with hs,3g with high speeds
physical buttons
galaxy nexus has no physical buutons (i dont like this) and at present not all apps are configured to advantage of it and u can sometimes find it irritating
also in nexus you do not have an onscreen menu button , as apps will have itself menu onscreen touch button
for eg.while playing an old version game either the onscreen buttons of nexus will not hide and you will not be able to take full advantage of large screen, or the buttons will hide and not come back when you pause the game
note that many apps are updated and updating for use with galaxy nexus
s2 has home , menu and back buttons
RAM
both have 1gb ram(enough for good usage)
CAmera
definetly the 8mp camera for s2 is better, it somkes galaxy nexus's 5mp
in video recording , both do 1080p but i think so that s2 does 1080p and nexus does [email protected] , so s2 is better
nexus has 1.3mp front camera which can do 720p , s2 has 2mp front camera
Battery
totally a personal issue(both have 1,750 mAh)
sdcard
nexus does not have sd slot(pls confirm),s2 has sd slot
tv out
s2 has tv out and usb on the go , nexus has tv out(pls confirm)
Software
both have Ice cream sandwhich , and hopefully s2 will get android 5(jellybean), nexus should 100% get jellybean
also nexus will update faster with ics versions as it google flagship device
UI
very personal
i personally never like cold and dark holo ui of ics , cm9 found on galaxy nexus, i think it lacks brightness and vivid colors
on s2 you have touchwiz 4 with some modifications in ics , it is bright and beautifull and i like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. S2 has faster processor than nexus
2. S2 processor can be OC'd to 1.7ghz
3. S2 doesn't have HD Super Amoled plus instead it just has Super Amoled plus (480x800 is not HD)
4. S2 doesn't have a 1750mAh battery instead it has a 1650mAh battery.
Hope it clears some misinformation about the above statement
@OP:
Nexus: Better screen, surely updates comes faster from Google and the feel of pure AOSP (Of course S2 can have a similar feeling through cyanogenmod9)
S2: Better processing speed, camera, gpu, has external sd card etc.
Some people over the S2 forums have both phones and they prefer the S2 more. But it's really up to you mate. Read reviews about both phones and go for the one you like
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Personally i'd go for the S2 because of it's superior gaming performance. The S2 is better then the Nexus for gaming as it has a superior graphics chip, paired with a lower resolution screen on the S2. The lower resolution screen makes a difference in performance, in a good way
Actually I love s2 becoz of its hardware but I like gnex becoz of its design n update
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
akashsgpgi said:
a short comparision bw Samsung galaxy s2(i9100 not i9100g) and galaxy nexus
CPU(both have dual core)
the s2 has Exynos(samsung's own cpu) 4210 @1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
the nexus has Texas Instruments(TI) OMAP4460 @ 1.2 ghz (Semiconductor technology 45 nm)
both run at 1.2 ghz but the nexus is undercloked to save battery , it can run at 1.5 ghz
alo omap 4 has better power management features to its architecture and ti open source
Exynos 4210 runs at 1.2ghz but it is overclocked to 1.4ghz in galaxy note
so OMAP4460 should be better( better for performance if you overclock , on stock they both run at 1.2ghz , so should perform similarly in most scenarios)
GPU (comparision of both s2 and nexus with current and q2-q3 2012 devices)
the s2 Has Mali 400 which is quad core and should be better
in the galaxy nexus we have PowerVR SGX540 @ 384 MHz (Single Core) the same gpu which was originally found in galaxy s (i9000 PowerVR SGX540 @ 200 MHz) but at really high clock to improve performance , it is very good cpu but is aging .. getting old in the era of ulp geforce(found in tegra 3 and tegra 2 which are cpu) and Adreno 225 and 320 [found in Krait i.e.. Snapdragon s4(28 nm)-which is better and more powerfull cpu that even tegra 3]
in the graphic performance mali 400 is better as it is quad core but SGX540 is also good , in many cases mali 400 performes better and in some cases SGX540 performes better , due to different architectures
Screen
s2 has HD Super AMOLED Plus and nexus has HD Super AMOLED
galaxy nexus smokes s2 with its hd screen 1280x720 but with Pentile matrix arrangement(trust me its not noticible)
s2 has normal wvga 800x480 resolution wihout Pentlie Matrix
nexus has 4.65 screen and i s bigger than s2's 4.3 to watch videos)
Both have good connectivity wifi,gps ,bluetooth 3.0 with hs,3g with high speeds
physical buttons
galaxy nexus has no physical buutons (i dont like this) and at present not all apps are configured to advantage of it and u can sometimes find it irritating
also in nexus you do not have an onscreen menu button , as apps will have itself menu onscreen touch button
for eg.while playing an old version game either the onscreen buttons of nexus will not hide and you will not be able to take full advantage of large screen, or the buttons will hide and not come back when you pause the game
note that many apps are updated and updating for use with galaxy nexus
s2 has home , menu and back buttons
RAM
both have 1gb ram(enough for good usage)
CAmera
definetly the 8mp camera for s2 is better, it somkes galaxy nexus's 5mp
in video recording , both do 1080p but i think so that s2 does 1080p and nexus does [email protected] , so s2 is better
nexus has 1.3mp front camera which can do 720p , s2 has 2mp front camera
Battery
totally a personal issue(both have 1,750 mAh)
sdcard
nexus does not have sd slot(pls confirm),s2 has sd slot
tv out
s2 has tv out and usb on the go , nexus has tv out(pls confirm)
Software
both have Ice cream sandwhich , and hopefully s2 will get android 5(jellybean), nexus should 100% get jellybean
also nexus will update faster with ics versions as it google flagship device
UI
very personal
i personally never like cold and dark holo ui of ics , cm9 found on galaxy nexus, i think it lacks brightness and vivid colors
on s2 you have touchwiz 4 with some modifications in ics , it is bright and beautifull and i like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro this is great.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Why not get the Samsung Galaxy Note GT-N7000 instead? It has a Super Amoled HD screen that's 800x1280, same camera as GS2, same processor as GS2, and it's the thinnest between the Nexus and the GS2. I love this phone and honestly wouldn't give it up for any phone right now.
Isn't the Exynos more powerful than the OMAP 4460?
I Am Marino said:
Isn't the Exynos more powerful than the OMAP 4460?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Right now Nexus simply wins because of the software..But things might change when the 3rd installment from the Galaxy S series arrives(a.k.a SGS3)..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I9100 is the best ¡¡
Hi guys, I'm currently torn between a few phones,
can you help me?
My budget is up to 300 euros (MAX), I can purchase the phone from either Netherlands or Germany, does anyone know any good shops there btw?
Anyway,
My question is which is better, the LG Optimus 2X (299 Euro), Xperia Sola (279 Euro) or Xperia Arc S (279 Euro)
I'm pretty much looking for the best gaming performance, the LG has Tegra2, the Sola has Mali-400MP 1 Core, and the Arc S has Adreno 205,
There is no comparison between these GPUs, I've searched for hours, and also there's no comparison of the Mali-400 single core to quad core variant anywhere!
Also, there's no definitive comparison between a Dual Core 1GHZ Cortex A9 to a single core 1.4GHZ Snapdragon Scorpion CPU!
This is what I've got so far, only the stuff I care about in the phone (for example, I don't care about the camera or whether its TFT or AMOLED).
1. LG Optimus 2X
-Dual core 1.0ghz and Tegra2 Seems to be the best. (Good)
-4.0" Screen (Good)
-Battery performance seems to be in the gutter ~1500mAh. (Bad)
-More Expensive
2. Xperia Sola
-Dual core and Mali-400MP1 (Good or bad?)
-Battery built into phone, can't replace it or get a replacement battery, 1320mAh. (Bad)
-3.7" Screen (Average)
-Coolness factor - Hover touch and cool Tags, NFC Capable
3. Arc S
-Single Core 1.4GHZ (Good or bad?)
-Adreno 205 (Good or bad?)
-4.2" Screen (Good)
-Average Battery life
Thanks in advance!!!
I would go with the LG Optimus 2X. But, I'm no expert. I would be interested in what others think.
I would completely eliminate the xperia arc S b/c it is a single core and that it has an outdated adreno 205 gpu. That means you will get lag and not be very optimal for gaming.
That said, the top gpu in your choices is most definitely the Mali 400 in the Xperia Sola. It is better than the Tegra 2 in almost all aspects. Tegra 2 also has one major drawback and that it does not have NEON support. NEON is basically a video optimization software built into the gpu, but Tegra does not have it, so some video formats cannot play properly or not at all.
As for comparisons, here is one: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/16
The Tegra 2 is labeled as the ULP GeForce and you will see that the Mali 400 blows it out of the water.
Also on a side note, there are many hardware problems with the LG Optimus 2X, like random reboots or bad signal, so overall, in terms of build quality, cpu and graphics, go for a xperia sola.
vx117 said:
I would completely eliminate the xperia arc S b/c it is a single core and that it has an outdated adreno 205 gpu. That means you will get lag and not be very optimal for gaming.
That said, the top gpu in your choices is most definitely the Mali 400 in the Xperia Sola. It is better than the Tegra 2 in almost all aspects. Tegra 2 also has one major drawback and that it does not have NEON support. NEON is basically a video optimization software built into the gpu, but Tegra does not have it, so some video formats cannot play properly or not at all.
As for comparisons, here is one: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/16
The Tegra 2 is labeled as the ULP GeForce and you will see that the Mali 400 blows it out of the water.
Also on a side note, there are many hardware problems with the LG Optimus 2X, like random reboots or bad signal, so overall, in terms of build quality, cpu and graphics, go for a xperia sola.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was basing my recommendation on the Mali GPU in the Galaxy S2: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4177/samsungs-galaxy-s-ii-preliminary-performance-mali400-benchmarked.
Also, this article suggests the Tegra 2 is better: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-mali-400mp-gpu-and-vs-tegra-2/.
But, as I said, I know very little about these GPUs and phones.
Python. said:
I was basing my recommendation on the Mali GPU in the Galaxy S2: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4177/samsungs-galaxy-s-ii-preliminary-performance-mali400-benchmarked.
Also, this article suggests the Tegra 2 is better: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-mali-400mp-gpu-and-vs-tegra-2/.
But, as I said, I know very little about these GPUs and phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, most articles favor Mali 400 MP. Both are strong gpu's, but the lack of NEON video optimization is a deal breaker.
vx117 said:
Well, most articles favor Mali 400 MP. Both are strong gpu's, but the lack of NEON video optimization is a deal breaker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Mali is a good gpu but you should know that the sola has a Mali 400 mp1
that means it's singlecore but the gpu of the s2 is the Mali 400mp4 it's the quadcore version:banghead:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
oh yeah, you're right, that is a Mali 400 MP1. I wasn't aware of that. That really sucks then.
If thats the case, then go with the LG Optimus 2X. The Tegra 2 has a 8 core gpu. That's definitely better than a single core gpu anyday.
Sorry for the confusion.
Galaxy s3
Sent from my LT15i using xda premium
emilfadillah said:
Galaxy s3
Sent from my LT15i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy S3, although a great phone, is 500 euros which is far beyond the OP's budget.
Since you'll be gaming, the most powerful gpu and the longest battery life matter most. LG wins both counts.Get the LG,flash a barebones ROM that frees up ram and increases battery life,and game away.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
LG released a fix for the restarting bug I found on the net.
It plays H264 MKV files no? are the missing codecs that much of a problem?
Thanks for the help guys!!
But just last thing, 1.4GHZ single core VS 1.0GHZ dual core = dual core winner?
Mali-400MP 1 Core VS Adreno 205 = Mali winner?
opala said:
LG released a fix for the restarting bug I found on the net.
It plays H264 MKV files no? are the missing codecs that much of a problem?
Thanks for the help guys!!
But just last thing, 1.4GHZ single core VS 1.0GHZ dual core = dual core winner?
Mali-400MP 1 Core VS Adreno 205 = Mali winner?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arc S > Sola in all areas.
Mali 400mp1 < adreno 205 it's just that adreno is aging.
Sent from my U8150 using XDA
I'm a big fan of the One S, and think that it would be great hardware, when tweaked a bit, for a more "casual" Nexus that could actually compete with the iPhone. Due to the moniker, Nexus 7, it would be called the Nexus 4.
Changes from One S to Nexus 4:
Keep 4.3" screen size, but with One X quality. Higher brightness and > 300ppi.
Cut off the hardware buttons to reduce the vertical size and weight of the phone.
Bump ram to 2GB.
Pure Google
So what do you think? Any changes? Do you think it's a good idea? Could you see a large casual market adopting this phone in a similar way to the iPhone?
Here's a quick mockup: Nexus 4
thanamesjames said:
I'm a big fan of the One S, and think that it would be great hardware, when tweaked a bit, for a more "casual" Nexus that could actually compete with the iPhone. Due to the moniker, Nexus 7, it would be called the Nexus 4.
Changes from One S to Nexus 4:
Keep 4.3" screen size, but with One X quality. Higher brightness and > 300ppi.
Cut off the hardware buttons to reduce the vertical size and weight of the phone.
Bump ram to 2GB.
Pure Google
So what do you think? Any changes? Do you think it's a good idea? Could you see a large casual market adopting this phone in a similar way to the iPhone?
Here's a quick mockup: Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Design of the One S is amazing and would not change it too much, maybe a slight change to the backing so it doesnt slip of the hand. Screen Size 4.3" to 4.5". Removable battery and edge to edge display.
Yeah would be nice, but without the hardware buttons it looks a little bit ****ty.
If I helped in any way please hit thanks
thanamesjames said:
I'm a big fan of the One S, and think that it would be great hardware, when tweaked a bit, for a more "casual" Nexus that could actually compete with the iPhone. Due to the moniker, Nexus 7, it would be called the Nexus 4.
Changes from One S to Nexus 4:
Keep 4.3" screen size, but with One X quality. Higher brightness and > 300ppi.
Cut off the hardware buttons to reduce the vertical size and weight of the phone.
Bump ram to 2GB.
Pure Google
So what do you think? Any changes? Do you think it's a good idea? Could you see a large casual market adopting this phone in a similar way to the iPhone?
Here's a quick mockup: Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add a good notification led (the one on the One S sucks) that's compatible with light flow and I'd get one!
-Sent from my Razr M.-
Thanks God it just a your design man
DualCore is too old.
We need:
Chipset: Qualcomm MDM9615/APQ8064
CPU: Quad-core 1.5 GHz Krait
GPU: Adreno 320
F*** the "LG"
But check the damn performance of new S4 PRO:
1:30
Meh, what sort of flagship device would have a mid range phone screen size? Or better yet, why would they downgrade from the Galaxy Nexus?
Hgaara said:
Meh, what sort of flagship device would have a mid range phone screen size? Or better yet, why would they downgrade from the Galaxy Nexus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they keep going for bigger screens, then the nexus 8 will be a tablet
r0man.de said:
If they keep going for bigger screens, then the nexus 8 will be a tablet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 4.3 to 4.5 max for a phone for me, have no qualms with screen size of HOS.
Sent from my HTC One S using xda app-developers app
avetny said:
Thanks God it just a your design man
DualCore is too old.
We need:
Chipset: Qualcomm MDM9615/APQ8064
CPU: Quad-core 1.5 GHz Krait
GPU: Adreno 320
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What, noo, we neeeeed 6 Core everything other is just way too old, because everyone knows 2 cores in a phone just isn't enough and every app uses at least 4 Cores!!!!!!! 5GHz has to be, anything else won't bring me to the top of the bench!! Has no real world needs, but who cared, SPECS!!!!!!
Trying to make it as realistic as possible whilst also powerful:
1.5GHz quad-core Qualcomm APQ8064
Adreno 320 GPU
4.7", 720p Super AMOLED HD (non-pentile), manufactured by Sharp
1.5GB RAM
12MP Camera with burst-shot function
On-screen buttons
32GB Storage, no SD card slot
25GB Dropbox space
usaff22 said:
Trying to make it as realistic as possible whilst also powerful:
1.5GHz quad-core Qualcomm APQ8064
Adreno 320 GPU
4.7", 720p Super AMOLED HD (non-pentile), manufactured by Sharp
1.5GB RAM
12MP Camera with burst-shot function
On-screen buttons
32GB Storage, no SD card slot
25GB Dropbox space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS.