Since there are tons of roms, and since none is perfect I'll try to keep track here of there benchmark results. Everybody is welcomed to help, I'll keep updating the 1st thread as results come since I'm not insane and neither have the time to test every rom avaible. Please do the tests after you installed all your apps since noone is interested of the results in the best case scenario, but in day to day use.
Please use Quadrant, Neocore, Linpack and post here the results and I'll update the post.
Thank you.
Im aware that each device will have different results and results may vary from each run, So as results will come, I'll post Highest score, Lowest score and Average Score at each rom.
Average will be posted when enough scores will be avaible
Higher is better, higher means faster ROM, smoother scrolling, more fps in games etc.
By public demand I'll keep the stats for 720p fps
[ROM] RoufianosV3 Official 2.2 Rooted|A2SD|EXT4| SUPERB [3/aug/10]
Quadrant
Hi: 1313
Lo: 1140
Av:
Neocore
Hi: 28.5 FPS
Lo:
Av
Linpack
Hi: 40.702
Lo:
Av:
720p FPS:
[ROM][3/08] ۵.NexTSense v2.1b Official Sense-FroYo 2.2 ·(720p | 2.09 |AP2SD+) by NeoP
Quadrant
Hi: 1438
Lo: 1191
Av:
Neocore
Hi: 29.2
Lo: 29.0
Av
Linpack
Hi: 40.380
Lo: 39.513
Av:
720p FPS:
[ROM] Official 2.2, with: busybox, old A2SD+, OpenVPN (TUN), EXT4 support, 802.11N
Quadrant
Hi: 1355
Lo: 1173
Av:
Neocore
Hi: 28.4
Lo: 28.1
Av
Linpack
Hi: 41.03
Lo: 31.657
Av:
720p FPS:
Froyo Sense LeeDrOiD Mod V1.7 03/08 l Official HTC 2.2 l Fast l Stable l A2SD+
Quadrant
Hi: 1314
Lo: 1170
Av:
Neocore
Hi: 28.6
Lo: 28.5
Av
Linpack
Hi: 36.825
Lo: 32.222
Av:
720p FPS:
reserved for .. dunno just in case
Leedroid 1.6 -> 1288 (quadrant)
Open desire 3.0.2 -> 1287 (quadrant)
Leedroid 1.6 -> 40.229 mflops (linpack)
OPen desire 3.0.2 -> 41.658 (linpack)
both benchmarks were performed 3 times and the best result was taken.
[ROM][3/08] ۵.NexTSense v2.1b Official Sense-FroYo 2.2 ·(720p | 2.09 |AP2SD+) by NeoP
Quadrant = 1384
Linpack = 40.306
Neocore = 28.8
[ROM][3/08] ۵.NexTSense v2.1b Official Sense-FroYo 2.2 ·(720p | 2.09 |AP2SD+) by NeoP
Linpack
1st: 40.099
2nd: 39.804
3rd: 39.513
Quadrant
1st: 1191
2nd: 1298
3rd: 1349
Neocore
1st: 29.0FPS
2nd: 29.1FPS
3rd: 29.2FPS
Please include 720 fps.
b-george said:
Please include 720 fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
& nice job m8
this kind of thread we need
my resultats are:
Quadrant
1st. :1297
2nd.: 1288
linpack
1st :
36.331
38.122
The problem with this is that it you run it more than once you get different results. Should it be average?. Plus overclocking change things. On Opendesire 3.0.2. I get linpack of like 42 and quadrant near 1500 which is very different to toguy above!
Froyo Sense LeeDrOiD Mod V1.7 03/08 l Official HTC 2.2 l Fast l Stable l A2SD+
Quadrant: 1170 | 1261 | 1314
Neocore: 28.6 | 28.5 | 28.5
Linpack: 32.222 | 36.825 | 36.089
taylor162 said:
The problem with this is that it you run it more than once you get different results. Should it be average?. Plus overclocking change things. On Opendesire 3.0.2. I get linpack of like 42 and quadrant near 1500 which is very different to toguy above!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do the tests after you installed all your apps since noone is interested of the results in the best case scenario, but in day to day use.
We should stick to non-oc i think.
And shouldnt the biggest score of linpack be posted instead of three first? It can get from 15 to 40....
Thread starter.. are you updating first post with max results from additional posts?
I love this topic!!!I think nextheme is the best!
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Hmm okay well I'm using opendesire 3.0.2 overcloked and I got:
Quadrant:
High 1599
Low 1439
Linpack
high 44. 372
low 42. 965
A brief explanation of what the scores mean might be helpful. e.g. the higher the the higher the quadrant the better/faster the ROM CPU is. I have no idea what Neocore, Linpack or Quadrant scores actually mean or do, but that may just be me...
Thanks
mattiadj said:
I love this topic!!!I think nextheme is the best!...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean NexTSense?
taylor162 said:
The problem with this is that it you run it more than once you get different results. Should it be average?. Plus overclocking change things. On Opendesire 3.0.2. I get linpack of like 42 and quadrant near 1500 which is very different to toguy above!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As ive stated in the title i was referring only @ roms based on oficial 2.09 release.
Overclocking is not possible at the moment at least till htc will not release the source code for their kernel, so roms w/ o/c are not based on htc latest kernel.
And since people are asking i'll add the 720p fps to each rom.
Thanks again for helping me doing this statistics. I can only test the roms im using.. and im not a flash addict
Including 720p fps is useless. It is dependent on the lightning conditions above all else, so unless there is a real 'lab' to make sure the recording conditions are exactly the same, 720p fps recording measurement is impossible to compare between ROMs.
I have 40.702 linpack for Roufianos V3 so you can add that.
Quadrant gave me after three tests 1140 (only!!), 1307 and 1313
I tested NextSense 2.1b also but i could not get more than 38.. i dont know why.
Quadrant on the other hand got my phone on top of the list with 1348!!
taylor162 said:
Hmm okay well I'm using opendesire 3.0.2 overcloked and I got:
Quadrant:
High 1599
Low 1439
Linpack
high 44. 372
low 42. 965
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have the opendesire 3.0.2 and get the same ..
How to test 720p? any app?
Didn't see any other threads yet, so here are my Quadrant numbers. Personally I don't think it's a great benchmark, but it does give some measure for comparison...
All my tests were done 3 times and then averaged. CPU frequency scaling was set to "performance" to prevent throttling.
ROM: I897UCJH3
Kernel: Unhelpful's 1.2GHz OC Kernel
Mods: SuperRooterExtreme w/ Tayutama's LagFix v2.2.2 (Ext4)
CPU @ 1.0 GHz (Stock):
total: 1887
cpu: 768
memory: 1825
io: 5614
2d: 311
3d: 918
CPU @ 1.2 GHz (Overclocked):
total: 2116
cpu: 906
memory: 1743
io: 6547
2d: 358
3d: 1029
Anyone else?
Shammyh said:
Didn't see any other threads yet, so here are my Quadrant numbers. Personally I don't think it's a great benchmark, but it does give some measure for comparison...
All my tests were done 3 times and then averaged. CPU frequency scaling was set to "performance" to prevent throttling.
ROM: I897UCJH3
Kernel: Unhelpful's 1.2GHz OC Kernel
Mods: SuperRooterExtreme w/ Tayutama's LagFix v2.2.2 (Ext4)
CPU @ 1.0 GHz (Stock):
total: 1887
cpu: 768
memory: 1825
io: 5614
2d: 311
3d: 918
CPU @ 1.2 GHz (Overclocked):
total: 2116
cpu: 906
memory: 1743
io: 6547
2d: 358
3d: 1029
Anyone else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a million benchmarks in the related threads (overclock, lag, kernel, ROM version, etc.) - so you probably should just search on the word Quadrant and you will get more junk then you know what do with.
BTW, it has been determined that the Quadrant scores are virtually meaningless - Cyanogen has been able to get +3000 scores by doing some easy trickery - in the end the Quadrant benchmarks have no value in regards to real world performance.
That may be the case, but I haven't done any trickery. And I still think for lack of a better tool, it provides some manner of comparison. And having benchmarks in a single thread is a lot easier to compare than all over the individual mod/speed fix threads.
I have Prime v1.6 and Netformer 1.5.
I turned it up to 1.4ghz and i ran the Quadrant benchmark, i got a 2031.
now im looking on some websites and they show they got over 4000?
what's with this? am i getting correct numbers or not?
I got 6123 benchmark, clocked at 1.6ghz
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
If your TF isn't fully stable at a certain clockspeed then performance of the device may be affected resulting in a lower benchmark result.
A lot of these benchmarks are flawed and can be hacked. I get 35xx at 1.5 GHz on Revolver 1.1.1
Hi, i have Nexus S i9023 from second hand with broken power button ( button is always on ) and I want to know what the performance of full working stock rom + kernel on Nexus s with Android 4.1.2 . My benchmarks:
Geekbench 2.4.3 - 321
AnTuTu Benchmark v3.3 - 3236
Smartbench 2012 - Productivity index: 503; Gaming index: 1102
Linpack [MFLOPS] - 14.654
Your scores seem legit for a full stock Nexus S. In addition, on Quadrant benchmark a stock ROM and Kernel will reach around 1200.
Thank you ! my average score in quadrant is 1200 ... i was afraid that power button reduces performace or something... and... has samsung galaxy S more performace that Nexus s ? or it is the same ?
Hello,
Recently i flashed iconiaN 2.6 on my A700 and I'm really happy of it, works great
I get Vorbeth's oc kernel for iconiaN but I got a little problem with that one (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2004441)
The GPU overclock worked for me, I installed tegra overclock which has a thermal guard after my A700 was getting pretty hot just to be sure
Now I noticed that the cpu clock speed in tegra overclock and setCPU doesn't get higher then 1,2 or 1,3 in high performance. Normally it should get around 1,5 with Vorbeth's kernel or not? (Why is 1,5 not an option in setCPU?) Even overclock to 1,4 max and 1,4 min doesn't change anythinh, it's still 1,3GHz.
Did I baddly install the kernel or is it just setCPU that doesn't show the right clockspeed?
Thanks
headshot51 said:
Hello,
Recently i flashed iconiaN 2.6 on my A700 and I'm really happy of it, works great
I get Vorbeth's oc kernel for iconiaN but I got a little problem with that one (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2004441)
The GPU overclock worked for me, I installed tegra overclock which has a thermal guard after my A700 was getting pretty hot just to be sure
Now I noticed that the cpu clock speed in tegra overclock and setCPU doesn't get higher then 1,2 or 1,3 in high performance. Normally it should get around 1,5 with Vorbeth's kernel or not? (Why is 1,5 not an option in setCPU?) Even overclock to 1,4 max and 1,4 min doesn't change anythinh, it's still 1,3GHz.
Did I baddly install the kernel or is it just setCPU that doesn't show the right clockspeed?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
11