Database Info

Quadrant Score App/Software

What app/software is everyone using to get their quadrant scores?

mmracing said:
What app/software is everyone using to get their quadrant scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one is easy...
Quadrant
Quadrant Standard to be exact.

Thanks tcrews!

Quadrant score of 1932 running TnT Lite 2.04

2227 with cyanogen

2450 with TnT Lite 2.02 + Performance Pack hulu plays fine too!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2368, with what I think is 2.02 and the performance pack. (I've lost track of where I am thanks to some restores--how can I tell?)
EDIT: Guess I was still on the performance pack--installed 2.0.4 and now my score is 1883.

2380 on CM6.1b4

Quadrant scores dropped after pershoot/VegaN install

Folks,
I was originally running the stock kernel + TnT Lite (latest) and using quadrant standard was achieving benchmark scores in the 2400's - now after installing pershoot kernel (latest with no modules) and the latest VegaN I am now seeing a score of just over 1700 - is this something I should be particularly concerned about? Are there, for lack of a better term, optimizations that are missing either from this ROM or kernel that are coming in the future?

Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's

CPU governor
I believe this is because pershoot uses the ondemand cpu governor instead of performance. Gives better battery, but benchmarks are lower. In daily use you really shouldn't see a difference as the cpu will ramp up when you need it.

that totally makes sense... thanks...

I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant

TheJesus said:
I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too don't necessarily care about break-neck speed results in Quadrant but what I do care about is if lower scores are being caused by bleeding-edge drivers that may cause problems for me down the road vs. power saving techniques being employed by the kernel - hence my original question.
But at the end of the day, if what you need runs smoothly, then its all moot

Rumbleweed said:
Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running VEGAn 5.1.1 with the stock kernel also but I am getting scores of 1800-1900 with Quadrant Standard
How can I figure out why I am not seeing a higher level of performance? Thanks.
Jay

Just ran it and got 2559 - Vegan 5.1.1 - Clemsyn Kernel and libsqlite.so and plenty of stuff running.
I'm pretty sure it has always been around 2100+ on any ROM or stock kernel I have tried.
That is strange..

Quadrant scores?

I know that quandrant is not a good benchmark because the results depends on the hardware installed (CPU qualcomm or samsung or TI OMAP), but my question is:
Desire S in quadrant advanced reach a score of 3000 in the CPU section; the xperia arc, with the same CPU reach a score of 5500 in the cpu section. They are both on gingerbread....so why this difference?
Also the desire HD with froyo and the same Qualcomm CPU reach a 5500 score...
I can't uderstaind!
sorry 4 my english

My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?

liljom said:
My wife just got her Des S, and Mega jump is lagging
Quadrant score is 1000-1200
how can it happen with an Adreno 205 inside?
it has 1.28.401.1 ROM on it. do you experience it with other ROMs too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've got no lag at all....

ilbulgaro89 said:
i've got no lag at all....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?

liljom said:
no lag on Mega jump? not even when you pick up a rocket?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no lag at all in this game

ilbulgaro89 said:
no lag at all in this game
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and what is your Quadrant score?

liljom said:
and what is your Quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
around 1240

ilbulgaro89 said:
around 1240
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/

liljom said:
yeah, that is the max I can get too
the funny thing is, that my Desire HD with a Desire S port performs better; same CPU, GPU and screen resolution; and no lag in megajump :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, I also do not explain the differences in benchmark scores with this 2 devices

i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...

Since the Desire S is the "first" device from HTC dressed in Gingerbread...can we safely say that it wasn't an optimized Gingy version that HTC brought up?
If all the Desire family get their Gingerbread update (Classic, HD, Z) and did perform well in benchmarking, that would leave Desire S...????

RogerPodacter said:
i gave my opinion of why the lower scores in this thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036668
basically there has been a general trend on most phones that gingerbread performs lower than froyo on benchmark tests and performance. this is certainly been my experience. and since the desire s is running gingerbread, while the desire HD is running froyo (i think, right?), that is your answer right there...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU

liljom said:
you are right
I run Gingerbread on my DHD, and the Quadrant is lower
I thought it's because we don't have the gingerbread sources for DHD, and we don't have the right drivers
but still, DHD has 1500-1600 in Quadrant (compare to 1200) with DS 1.28 port :/ and that's a big difference with the same CPU, GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)

ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 things can save us:
-we find the way to root DS
-we get a good update from HTC

DS is relatively still a "baby"
we'll get there eventually

ilbulgaro89 said:
i ask it in this thread for this reason: dhd has an higher results with desire s gingebread porting......a my friend has in test a developer version of incredible s with gingerbread 2.3.3 and his quadrant score is 1450 (higher than desire s...but with same hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.

RogerPodacter said:
well maybe your friend's incredible s is overclocked, or he has some other type of customization that you are not aware of. because what i am trying to say is that, stock 2.2 vs stock 2.3, there is a performance and quadrant drop, significantly. stock 2.3 may get around 1250 quadrant, and stock froyo may get around 1650 quadrant. i get 1200 on 2.3, but i can over clock to maximum and get 1400. but somethign still isnt right, because i could over clock on 2.2 and get 1700.
also, people say quadrant scores are meaningless. but this has gotten mis interpreted on the web. quadrant scores are meaningless BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHONE MODELS. but quadrant definitely has meanign within the same device. so if your device runs 1600 on 2.2, then 1200 on 2.3, that is a meaningful piece of data. benchmark shows the ability of your phone to do various tasks like scroll a list, load some html or javascript, or parse a bunch of data. so it annoys me when others (not in this thread) say quadrant is meaningless. what the original statement meant was that lower device A could be optimized very well to be smooth, while higher device B could be better hardware, but optimized poorly to not be smooth, and a benchmark would not tell this story. i agree wtih that. but not within the same device i dont
i also see slower choppy scrolling in 2.3, for example tapatalk threads and lists were smooth in 2.2, but choppy and chunky in 2.3, etc. and the benchmark seems to agree with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my friend's incredible s is a stock phone updated to Gingerbread via OTA today...without any type of hack...incredible s is not rooted!

My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.

njd said:
My understanding was that Gingerbread is quite a bit slower than Froyo in Quadrant tests.
In real use though, it seems fine.
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Desire HD came out with 2.2, and now it runs 2.3, and yes, the Quadrant went down

njd said:
I suppose we'll have more idea when 2.3.3 upgrades become available for devices currently running 2.2.x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On htc-hero score was equal on 2.2 and 2.3 (both overclocked CM-ROMs)
On my NexuS with 2.3 I have scores about 2500 @ 1GHz (and crazy >3000 @ 1,4GHz)
On the DesireS I only get 1200 @ 1Ghz (equal performance gov or ondemand)
Wired is the totaly different fps: desireS has 50fps at the "planet3D" where Nexus has only 20fps; in the "doom3D" it is vice versa
But in everyday use there is no big difference - I tend to sell the NexuS, but really not sure wich phone I should keep..

Benchmark Scores

Post your Benchmark scores here.
Also mention the Benchmark Tool and Device Info please.
So, we can compare ROMs and Kernels..

713 in Quadrant Standard
My Score was 713 in Quadrant Standard.
Device Info:
Kyrillos' v9.5
G3MOD 2.3 OC
Also, v6_supercharger was enabled, ChainFire3D and CPU OC @ 1.2 GHz..

749
Same device, but 749 with other settings...

935 with Kyrillos V10 Final, Openfimg, Arakmars ICS 24 Kernel and 1.2 ghz max and min

[STATS] Desire S ICS ROM's performance test results

Everyone out there always wants to know how the all ICS ROM's for our much desired device stand against each other in terms of performance.
There are various issues of asking other users opinions on performance are
Different clock speeds
Difference in hardware
Difference in count of bg services running
I intend to eliminate these issues by running the below benchmarks on my phone after the below steps
Clean ROM install
Install gapps
Restoring these apps using TB (in case of CM9 download from market)
Set CPU at 1113 MHZ and 1125 MHZ on Sense 4A
Reboot
Antutu (SD card test excluded)
Nenamark 1
Nenamark 2
Here are the results of two consecutive runs
After seeing the variance in Antutu benchmarks I decidede to do 3 round sof Antutu and 2 each of Nenamark 1 and 2
Detailed Results:
CM9:
Antutu: 2522, 2800, 2795
Nenamark 1: 43.7, 43.3
Nenamark 2: 26.0, 25.8
Vanilla ICE AOKP:
Antutu: 3114, 3107
Nenamark 1: 43.5, 43.4
Nenamark 2: 25.6, 25.5
Blind MIUI:
Antutu: 2769, 2804
Nenamark 1: 43.3, 43.5
Nenamark 2: 25.9, 26
Primadonna:
Antutu: 2817, 2707
Nenamark 1: 47.3, 47.3
Nenamark 2: 27.5, 26.6
Unofficial AOKP by Tectas:
Antutu: 2787, 2831
Nenamark 1: 43.2, 43.2
Nenamark 2: 26, 26.1
Blind ICE AOKP:
Antutu: 2840, 2849
Nenamark 1: 43.5, 43.9
Nenamark 2: 25.9, 26.2
Virtuou Saga:
Antutu: 2821, 2876
Nenamark 1: 52.5, 52.2
Nenamark 2: 26.5, 26.7
Primo S v 4.0 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2570, 2555
Nenamark 1: 53, 52.7
Nenamark 2: 26.7, 26.6
Reaper @1024MHz
Antutu: 2531, 2644
Nenamark 1: 40.7, 40.6
Nenamark 2: 11.6, 11.8
Fallout v1.0 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2518, 2557
Nenamark 1: 53.1, 53.2
Nenamark 2: 27.7, 27.9
CM9 20120611 with Linaro @1125 MHz:
Antutu: 2884, 2904
Nenamark 1: 38.5, 38.7
Nenamark 2: 25.7, 25.7
Fallout v3.0 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2868, 2851
Nenamark 1: 52.2, 52.5
Nenamark 2: 26.7, 26.5
Fallout v3.1.1 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2934, 2951
Nenamark 1: 53.2, 53.3
Nenamark 2: 26.9 27.3
Average Scores:
CM9:
Antutu: 2705
Nenamark 1: 43.5
Nenamark 2: 25.9
Vanilla ICE AOKP:
Antutu: 3110.5
Nenamark 1: 43.45
Nenamark 2: 25.55
Blind MIUI:
Antutu: 2786.5
Nenamark 1: 43.4
Nenamark 2: 25.95
Primadonna:
Antutu: 2762
Nenamark 1: 47.3
Nenamark 2: 27.05
Unofficial AOKP by Tectas:
Antutu: 2809
Nenamark 1: 43.2
Nenamark 2: 26.05
Blind ICE AOKP:
Antutu: 2844.5
Nenamark 1: 43.7
Nenamark 2: 26.05
Virtuou Saga:
Antutu: 2873.5
Nenamark 1: 52.35
Nenamark 2: 26.6
Primo S v 4,0
Antutu: 2562.5
Nenamark 1: 52.85
Nenamark 2: 26.65
Reaper(GB) @1024MHz
Antutu: 2587.5
Nenamark 1: 40.65
Nenamark 2: 11.7
Fallout v1.0 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2537.5
Nenamark 1: 53.15
Nenamark 2: 27.8
CM9 20120611 with Linaro @1125 MHz:
Antutu: 2894
Nenamark 1: 38.6
Nenamark 2: 25.7
Fallout v3.0 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2859.5
Nenamark 1: 52.35
Nenamark 2: 26.6
Fallout v3.1.1 @1024MHz
Antutu: 2942.5
Nenamark 1: 53.25
Nenamark 2: 27.1
Winners
Antutu : Vannila Ice @1.1 GHz, Fallout @ 1GHz
Nenamark 1 : Fallout
Nenamark 2 : Fallout

This is useful it will save people asking questions about performance
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA

Higher the better?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA

skim0322 said:
Higher the better?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes

Haha thanks. Sorry for raising more questions when you were trying to eliminate them.
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA

Thanks! Using SenseMOD FlashONE 1.3(Sense 4a) and already know, that sense 4 has better graphics performance...

Yeah vanilla is the best

Thanks for this comparision, might be useful.

Stats updated with Virtuous Saga 1.0.0

Thx mate!
It's really useful!

Wow, Virtuous Saga clearly leading the graphic scores. It's clearly visible when playing games/browsing/

shrome99 said:
Wow, Virtuous Saga clearly leading the graphic scores. It's clearly visible when playing games/browsing/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When i use virtous saga and playin games some games work and sum dont i tryed tna impact and it got stuck on black screen and ma desire went dead i coludnt even get back to my home screen
Sent from my HTC Desire S using XDA

shrome99 said:
Wow, Virtuous Saga clearly leading the graphic scores. It's clearly visible when playing games/browsing/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, even with not being optimized, this thing flies at 1GHz...
And to be fair all other scores are at 1.1 GHz, so sick ICS and kernel3 kicks ass even when un-optimized
Sent from a Desire S waiting for Kernel 3. WAKE UP HTC!!!!

suku_patel_22 said:
Agree, even with not being optimized, this thing flies at 1GHz...
And to be fair all other scores are at 1.1 GHz, so sick ICS and kernel3 kicks ass even when un-optimized
Sent from a Desire S waiting for Kernel 3. WAKE UP HTC!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thanks for posting these results, have just recently got a desire s and rooted and was looking for benchmarks for the roms.
Tried MIUI but that wasnt for me as i am a stock kinda guy, then flashed Tectas Unofficial AOKP and wow im really impressed, nice to see its has some good test results.

The 3.0 kernel is indeed a great update, the battery life I think it might just increased with about 40%, which is a great thing(d'oh, Cpt. Obvious ).
Although there is one problem I found, when I switch to video recording(720p only), the display turns to blue and then back to normal, and so on. I can't post in the ROM's topic so I hope I'll get an answer here.

ToXiC313 said:
The 3.0 kernel is indeed a great update, the battery life I think it might just increased with about 40%, which is a great thing(d'oh, Cpt. Obvious ).
Although there is one problem I found, when I switch to video recording(720p only), the display turns to blue and then back to normal, and so on. I can't post in the ROM's topic so I hope I'll get an answer here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You better open a new thread in Q&A fur such queries.
As for your issue, I don't have any such problems with the camera.
Sent from a Desire S waiting for Kernel 3. WAKE UP HTC!!!!

ToXiC313 said:
The 3.0 kernel is indeed a great update, the battery life I think it might just increased with about 40%, which is a great thing(d'oh, Cpt. Obvious ).
Although there is one problem I found, when I switch to video recording(720p only), the display turns to blue and then back to normal, and so on. I can't post in the ROM's topic so I hope I'll get an answer here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had that with hd video,installed new radio and it went away,don't know if it was the radio or the wipe that did it.more likely the wipe
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

PrimoS V4.0 scores added!!

On public demand added scores for a GB rom (Reaper) to have a base for comparison!!

I love Vanilla ICE AOKP, it works great on my mobile.
Thanks for your test!