i am going to buy a mobile phone after 3 days
but i wanna to know which is better Galaxy W or Galaxy SL (( acc. to the performance not the specfication ))
and which is better display sl with slcd or W with higher gpc adreno 205 ???
fathyazhary said:
i am going to buy a mobile phone after 3 days
but i wanna to know which is better Galaxy W or Galaxy SL (( acc. to the performance not the specfication ))
and which is better display sl with slcd or W with higher gpc adreno 205 ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you mean video display or ??
Take Sl if so.
Both GPUs are pretty much the same... i'd go Galaxy W for the higher clocked processor.
i9003!!!!!! Sure!!!
i advice you buy i9003!!
go for i9003..galaxy w despite a better processor fairs relativly same as sl...and devolpoment in sl section is far better than that...so sl obviously...and if u can get an galaxy s which is still avilable in some shops( rarity) go for that without hesitation
Definitely get the galaxy sl! You wont regret it!!
Related
Ok guys,i have been arguing with my brother who has a better phone,my galaxy 3 versus his wildfire.ive done some researching,and where i find it my phone is better. Here are some specs
Galaxy 3:
CPU:Samsung S5P6422 667 MHz
GPU:FM3DSE-its apparently some samsung's low gpu,but our galaxy 3 devs are working on it to make it better
RAM-256 mb
Multitouch-yes,even 10 point on cyanogenmod firmwares
Overclock-up to 1.4 ghz,1.2/1.3 stable
Wildfire:
CPU-528 arm11
GPU-no gpu
Multitouch-yes
Overclock-i dont know.
Someone please provide me some more wildfire specs so we can make a better comparsion
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
Just S.
Here are the specs:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9000_galaxy_s-3115.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9001_galaxy_s_plus-3908.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
It's up for you to decide
But in terms of active communities, I think Galaxy S take (i9000) takes the cake.
S i9000, It has more roms developed and more Cookers.
Galaxy s is far better than these phones
i9003 is the best.Probably en......I think so
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
the Important think in I9003 is that it has 487 MB OF RAM Vs 3xx for other s AND S+ and about Super clear LCD it lloks better in reality
slaid480 said:
the Important think in I9003 is that it has 487 MB OF RAM Vs 3xx for other s AND S+ and about Super clear LCD it lloks better in reality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the phones have 512MB but they have different reserved memory for video. That's why SL has more free memory (it has worse video card)
Sent from my GT-I9003
Galaxy S is the one best supported by developers here, but it's the most expensive one here in Italy, not as the latest phones obviously
falex007 said:
All the phones have 512MB but they have different reserved memory for video. That's why SL has more free memory (it has worse video card)
Sent from my GT-I9003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're wrong Dude,Galaxy S I9000 has 512 of RAM 1xx of it ram is used by the emulator that's why It has 3xx o ram user avaible,But the our galaxy SL I9003 It has a 650 MB of RAM so 487 of RAM avaible for users
I have a sg sl and the original.
Gt i9003 is better than the original one because of the cpu is faster, battery life is better and camera quality and the gpu isn't that bad, I got 14.4 fps on nenamark2 faster than xperia play by 0.3 fps but the s has a better gpu so if you are a gamer, the S is better although I recommend paying little more to buy the galaxy R
Spec-wize S Plus beats them both but development-wise Galaxy S wins
slaid480 said:
You're wrong Dude,Galaxy S I9000 has 512 of RAM 1xx of it ram is used by the emulator that's why It has 3xx o ram user avaible,But the our galaxy SL I9003 It has a 650 MB of RAM so 487 of RAM avaible for users
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
Both Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000 and S LCD GT-I9003 have 512MB RAM but since the latter houses a different processor and GPU, the available RAM is more - 478MB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
falex007 said:
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About what you said All Smasung 512MB RAM phones Got 3xx Like Galaxy W ,S Plus,ACE plus etc.....
i think I9000 (galaxy S) still have better overall performance than galaxy SL (I9003)...
falex007 said:
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Falex Mate, where did you get this info about bluetooth . My packaging and the following link:http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
Both state we have Bluetooth 3.0
Fell free to update my knowledge ,if I'm wrong.
S Plus but i have a sl
S = Better Display
SL = Better Processor
S PLUS = Better Display & Better Processor
it can be so easy
speedypoint said:
Falex Mate, where did you get this info about bluetooth . My packaging and the following link:http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
Both state we have Bluetooth 3.0
Fell free to update my knowledge ,if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over here I see different (v2.1) Also for my native language page I see v2.0 )))
OBviously SCL
In my opinion SCL is better phone than S because they made it after S. There are like 4 factors changing between both phones, like LCD screen.
SCL for eveR!!
Dragonety said:
In my opinion SCL is better phone than S because they made it after S. There are like 4 factors changing between both phones, like LCD screen.
SCL for eveR!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was searching new phone for me (almost 1 year ago) it was 3 parameters of the selecting i9003:
1. I compared 2 phones and I liked more the sharpness of the LCD display and more natural colors.
2. The price of i9003 was lesser
3. In the shop with the best prices there wasn't i9000 and I should wait for a week or 2 to take it.
Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks
A comparison between the two
^^^
Above is a spec by spec comparison of the two devices. they are both extremely similar but the Advanced usually seems to have a minor bump over the Ace. Though the Aces lower specs ( slower clock speed) may help improve battery life
justme8282 said:
Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy s advanced Win
Samsung Galaxy S Advance..
I have waited for years but Galaxy Ace 2 released in my country and then I realized S Advance have better performance with similar price..
samsung galaxy S advance for sure
Galaxy S Advence is better than Ace 2.
Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
olyloh6696 said:
Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both have a dual core but ace 2 is 800 MHz dual core but s advance has bigger screen size and 1ghz dual core cortex a9. and s advance are not very expensive in our country
Galaxy S Advance
I would go for the Galaxy S Advance due to the better storage options.
I would also prefer the Galaxy S Advance.
the Galaxy S Advance win, 4"screen size+AMOLED :good:
i heard a lot positive comments from camera section too
The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100
Gorjess said:
The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy S Advance.. : D
I have an ACE 2 because S Advance wasn't available on my country yet. Both phones can be clocked to 1.2 GHz. S Advance should have Super AMOLED Plus
Had the same dillema and I've chosen the S Advance, becouse of:
1. Faster processor clock
2. Better screen
3. Larger storage
4. Awsome design
I'm happy my s advance is awesome the screen is beautiful the sound is good and the cam is between regular and good my verdict for all including $$$ is **** (four stars)
Enviado desde mi LG-P970 usando Tapatalk 2
Galaxy S Advance Screen - Speaker - and Plastic quality is better than Galaxy Ace 2..
And S Advance corning gorilla glass.. Super Amoled
Galaxy Ace 2 PLS LCD
But Ace 2 Smaller - also screen is smaller and same processor but works 800 mhz so battery life will be much much better.
Are the better features of the Galaxy S Advance worth the doubling of price over the Ace 2?
The samsung galaxy ace 2 VS the samsung galaxy w.
These two very similar phones are driving me insane, I can't choose between them, so I could really do with some help.
Part of it comes down to lower power duelcore vs more powerful single core.
But there is also NFC capability, and how all this effects the battery?
Is powering two cores worse for the battery than powering one huge one? ram is also a concern, average vs better than? is trading processor for ram ok, how will that effect the experience?
The prices I can get them for ace 2 £220 (this price does not include unlocking it) http://www.carphonewarehouse.com/mobiles/choose-tariff/SAMSUNG_GALAXY_ACE_2/PPAY/NEW
galaxy w £230 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-I8150-Galaxy-Free-Smartphone/dp/tech-data/B005HBKGXS Help me android community, you're my only hope.
(I've been looking into it for a good while now, here's what I've found) http://geekaphone.com/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Ace-2-vs-Samsung-GALAXY-W http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_ace_2_i8160-4559.php http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_w_i8150-4114.php http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-GALAXY-Ace-2,Samsung-GALAXY-W/phones/6940,6098
Thanks for reading this far!
I've personally had the galaxy w/exhibit ii and loved it. It was fast and zippy and the screen was amazing. I think it came with a single core 1.0 GHz processor and 512 mb of RAM, so it was pretty fast specs wise. There is also a sizable amount of development for it as well. Also $200 for a phone this powerful was well worth it.
I don't know much about the galaxy ace 2, but I can personally vouched for the galaxy w.
Ace2 better than w
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Elwino2.3 said:
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ace 2 has 800 MHz DUAL CORE
Can some one suggest me a good phone from 500$ to 550$ .. !!
I want to buy a good phone,so wanted to some suggestions.
No body is there to suggest
Edward Cullen
Avilove.Cullen said:
No body is there to suggest
Edward Cullen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for Xperia P
dual core 1GHz
1GB RAM
16GB inbuilt
qHD display
8mp & 1.3mp with 1080 FULL HD Video REC
400MALI
but i came to know that micro sim is used ..
Avilove.Cullen said:
but i came to know that micro sim is used ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then u can go for sensation but u need to extend ur buget then but a good deal..
or go for xperia u if memory card is not a mater
or u can go for GS advance or ace 2 no dual core and only 220 GPU adrino
if u r ok with single processor then best option is xperia neo v or ray
ray is best as per camera option & display including sound...
galaxy SII ??
Avilove.Cullen said:
galaxy SII ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know its price may be 28000rs=600$-650$
not sure
go for samsung galaxy nexus!!!!!
its around 24000INR = 430$
Go for motorola atrix 2...it is 21000 Rs. (380 USD)
It is a high end phone at a great price
1ghz dual core processor, 8Mp camera capable of full HD (1080p) recording, 0.3 front camera, 4.3 inch display, nice battery life and most important lots of development
Harryhades said:
go for samsung galaxy nexus!!!!!
its around 24000INR = 430$
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am bit confused between nexus and sII
Thread moved to General Q&A.
Suggest you a phone...
Go sim only until you can decide what you actually want from the device.
No point someone else saying buy this as I could say buy a Nokia as I like the hardware and it does what I want it to.
Go to some phone shops and have a play with some of the devices and don't let the sales rep push you into buying a phone just cause it's there.
Once you have played with the phone you like the look feel of. Go home. research it on the internet. are there any problems? Chances are someone has done a youtube review of it and will give you the pros and cons. At the moment I'm trying to find a device that meets the following criteria
If nokia bring out a device before android that meets this then I'll be going over to Windows OS.
1080 p video recording
Wifi N
hdmi out
Dual Mics
olded display
small footprint Not Samsung galaxy 3s
NFC
BT 4.0
4g
Micro SD expansion slot
12mp camera or greater.
ill go with Galaxy S2 or ATT Skyrocket version... both are good imo!!
FREAK0N said:
ill go with Galaxy S2 or ATT Skyrocket version... both are good imo!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am also thinking of s2 as it's development is good over here. !
I vote for S2 as previous people. I was concerned about if it is convenient for calls before buying, but everything is just great (camera, lot of camera modes like panorama, responsive GUI, etc).
yeah i am going to buy it only
Avilove.Cullen said:
I am bit confused between nexus and sII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just picked up a Galaxy Nexus. I had the GSII when it first came out but the GS3 is just that much better. Is that out of your range? Have you checked Swappa.com?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Avilove.Cullen said:
I am also thinking of s2 as it's development is good over here. !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea... the S2 develop is good... but not the skyrocket... well.. actually the skyrocket dev is not as advanced as the normal S2... but is good enoght (i own one) so is up to you... there are few diferences...
S2 1.2Ghz Dual Core
Skyrocket 1.5Ghz Dual Core
So looks like skyrocket wins... BUT.... people sais S2 proccesor its better than skyrocket... because of manufacturer and stuff... i dont know about that
but there is a diference in screen... S2 its 4.3" Skyrocket 4.5"
soo i guess is up you :laugh:
good luck
FREAK0N said:
yea... the S2 develop is good... but not the skyrocket... well.. actually the skyrocket dev is not as advanced as the normal S2... but is good enoght (i own one) so is up to you... there are few diferences...
S2 1.2Ghz Dual Core
Skyrocket 1.5Ghz Dual Core
So looks like skyrocket wins... BUT.... people sais S2 proccesor its better than skyrocket... because of manufacturer and stuff... i dont know about that
but there is a diference in screen... S2 its 4.3" Skyrocket 4.5"
soo i guess is up you :laugh:
good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the model number of sky rocket?
Edward Cullen
And is the specifications same as of camera and etc
Edward Cullen