Does skyrocket has Glonass GPS? - AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727

I'm seeing some satellites as gray in GPS test app, are those Glonass ones?
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk

artisticcheese said:
I'm seeing some satellites as gray in GPS test app, are those Glonass ones?
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are the cylon ships...
I think only the galaxy note currently and the new Sony phones coming utilize the broadcom chip that accesses glonass.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App

There was a thread about this maybe a month or two ago... It does seem that the phone can see those satellites, though I'm not sure if it is currently set up to utilize the data from them (though if I'm wrong, someone please correct me!). GPS Status app definitely sees a ton of satellites which do appear to be glonass, but it doesn't seem to use them. Could just be a software thing at this point.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727

i had no idea that these were capable of tracking Glonass. i work in the GPS industry so it would be great to be able to use the russian satellites.
more birds just means better coverage....im sure we are only seeing L1 though, if we could L2 or even L5 online on these phones GPS would be Super Great.
Thanks for the info yall.

the2rrell said:
i had no idea that these were capable of tracking Glonass. i work in the GPS industry so it would be great to be able to use the russian satellites.
more birds just means better coverage....im sure we are only seeing L1 though, if we could L2 or even L5 online on these phones GPS would be Super Great.
Thanks for the info yall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s624273
Galaxy Note can use the satellite data and so will the upcoming Sony phones. If you have not seen a Galaxy Note's GPS is is pretty amazing!

The developer of GPS Status said his app does support GLONASS so if you see the additional SATs then your chipset should work with GLONASS. I see them on my Skyrocket...

planoman said:
Those are the cylon ships...
I think only the galaxy note currently and the new Sony phones coming utilize the broadcom chip that accesses glonass.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong.
These are the GLONASS satellites that Qualcomm has stated the S3 has the capability to see.

Longcat14 said:
Wrong.
These are the GLONASS satellites that Qualcomm has stated the S3 has the capability to see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not doubt it can see them but utilizing them is a different issue.
Why does the press release from Broadcom (who makes the chip) dated after the skyrocket was released say that the Galaxy Note is the first to use the chip that enables it to use the GLONASS system with it's GPS? Where is the link showing it for the skyrocket?
The Galaxy Note says it uses GLONASS on its box. I must have missed where it said that on my skyrocket box (like they would not broadcast that everywhere)...
I have both phones and there is no contest which one locks faster and hold a signal better. Not saying the skyrocket is a bad GPS but the Galaxy Note's is better.

Related

Where's the IR port???

In the UK, just bought a galaxy tab 2 7.0 after reading reviews galore, bit annoyed to find no IR port at all!!
Is it because its a UK version?
Also, i dunno if anyone else has the same problem but i can't get google+ to update, gmail to update, nor can i download facebook app either ?!?
Is it just me?
Clivectmob said:
In the UK, just bought a galaxy tab 2 7.0 after reading reviews galore, bit annoyed to find no IR port at all!!
Is it because its a UK version?
Also, i dunno if anyone else has the same problem but i can't get google+ to update, gmail to update, nor can i download facebook app either ?!?
Is it just me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sounds like you got a knock-off of it and not a genuine tab. Or possibly not the tab 2.
what is the model number listed in settings?
Not so, it's was from carphone warehouse, it's genuine alright, but i expect it's cos it's a UK version or summat. Also, changing connection sorted the downloads out. Which is odd, cos i have two other android devices that work fine with my home network.
Clivectmob said:
Not so, it's was from carphone warehouse, it's genuine alright, but i expect it's cos it's a UK version or summat. Also, changing connection sorted the downloads out. Which is odd, cos i have two other android devices that work fine with my home network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
model number from settings?
everything ive read says only the previous tab 7 had a no IR blaster variant. 2.0 doesnt have a model without it.
okay, yes it seems the 3110 does not have the ir port but the us variant 3113 does. sorry, trying to search fast cuz im at work :/
GT-P3110
Clivectmob said:
GT-P3110
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://downloadcenter.samsung.com/c...3_Galaxy_Tab_2_English_User_Manual_LD3_F3.pdf
page 19 shows it on the 3113 model
http://downloadcenter.samsung.com/c..._UM_EU_Icecream_Eng_Rev.1.0_120424_Screen.pdf
page 12 shows it not existing on the 3110 model
Bummer! Would have found that useful!!
Cheers for clearing that up tho
It appears only the us models have the ir blaster. I also bought the device based on the reviews, as the manual is not included, samsung should make a spec change like this clear. Still i love the tablet.
Yup, gotta be honest, for the wedge, it's great. Only thing lacking is the camera but i really don't think I'll be using it anyway.
P3110 has no IR port
rosera said:
It appears only the us models have the ir blaster. I also bought the device based on the reviews, as the manual is not included, samsung should make a spec change like this clear. Still i love the tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I purchased a Galaxy Samsung Tab 2 7 inch 3G P3110 version in Singapore. There isn't any IR blaster port either.
There isn't much use for the IR blaster, not for me anyway. Samsung hasn't released the code for it, so the tablet is essentially a P3110 once a custom ROM is installed.
Sent from my Nexus 4

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7" Infrared

I have been reading some reviews and from what I gathered is that the US version does not have an IR built in. Can anyone confirm this? And is this also for European versions?
I tried looking it up but some say it does and some say it doesn't.
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
I have the Samsung Galaxy 2 7.0" and YES, it does have the IR Blaster built-in.
As of now, only apps I found for it was the Peel (it came with the tablet) and Touchsquid.
I think the way it is 3113 us version has ir. 3110 international version has no ir.
good day.
chopper the dog said:
I think the way it is 3113 us version has ir. 3110 international version has no ir.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm this. The Dutch (international) version (P3110) has no IR.
Samsung Tab 2 IR blaster
The Samsung Tab 2 sold in the US has an IR blaster. It appears they don't include the feature outside the US. The Peel app is not fully functional outside the US so perhaps that is why they have IR only in the US.
The Touchsquid tablet has an IR blaster, and is available worldwide. The TS PRO remote control app is included in the price, costs $49 on the Samsung.
touchsquid said:
The Samsung Tab 2 sold in the US has an IR blaster. It appears they don't include the feature outside the US. The Peel app is not fully functional outside the US so perhaps that is why they have IR only in the US.
The Touchsquid tablet has an IR blaster, and is available worldwide. The TS PRO remote control app is included in the price, costs $49 on the Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually Touchsquid came up with a separate app specifically for Samsung Tab 2 (sold in the US with an IR blaster), costs 19.99$
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...251bGwsMSwxLDEsInJlbW90ZS5ob21lLnNhbXN1bmciXQ..
pupochek said:
Actually Touchsquid came up with a separate app specifically for Samsung Tab 2 (sold in the US with an IR blaster), costs 19.99$
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...251bGwsMSwxLDEsInJlbW90ZS5ob21lLnNhbXN1bmciXQ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They say this TouchSquid app should work on the Tab 7 Plus as well. Has anyone tried it? Is it worth $20?
touchsquid said:
The Samsung Tab 2 sold in the US has an IR blaster. It appears they don't include the feature outside the US. The Peel app is not fully functional outside the US so perhaps that is why they have IR only in the US.
The Touchsquid tablet has an IR blaster, and is available worldwide. The TS PRO remote control app is included in the price, costs $49 on the Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Canada has the ir blaster too
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium
touchsquid said:
The Samsung Tab 2 sold in the US has an IR blaster. It appears they don't include the feature outside the US. The Peel app is not fully functional outside the US so perhaps that is why they have IR only in the US.
The Touchsquid tablet has an IR blaster, and is available worldwide. The TS PRO remote control app is included in the price, costs $49 on the Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know that I'd call Peel fully functional withing the US either. It's been nothing but a buggy piece of crap that crashes all the time for me. Maybe the latest update will fix some things.
bsharitt said:
I don't know that I'd call Peel fully functional withing the US either. It's been nothing but a buggy piece of crap that crashes all the time for me. Maybe the latest update will fix some things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't had it crash, but i am unable to select a content guide, had to lie to it and say I get ota tv. Otherwise works well, not that I've used it much. Almost seems like a novelty, it easier to just use my Damn remote
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium
Well i have the US version of the tab (P3113) n i live in india....I can use peel to control my TV n all....
The Peel app asks you if you are International or in the US - the guide information may not work but the remote functions should work. I don't know, after about 5-10 minutes setting mine up with it working it just stopped and hasn't worked since.
Zerocool
Does the indian version has ir or not?....can anyone reply
Probably not. Pretty sure it's US only.
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
mussieonlinux said:
I have been reading some reviews and from what I gathered is that the US version does not have an IR built in. Can anyone confirm this? And is this also for European versions?
I tried looking it up but some say it does and some say it doesn't.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bought mine a while ago and it had no IR. It is the P3110 and I am from Greece. So freakin' disappointing.

Galaxy S4 NFC Tags Compatibility

Hey Gang,
Just want to make sure all the S4 owners know that Mifare Classic Tags are NOT fully compatible with the new Galaxy S4 since it used the Broadcom NFC Chip. Mifare Classics are the most affordable and inexpensive and are compatible with previous Galaxy models (S3, Note, Note 2) but are NOT fully compatible with this new S4.
NTAG203 tags are fully compatible with ALL NFC phones including the new Galaxy S4!
Any NFC Tag that adheres to the NFC Forum protocols will be fully compatible so stick to those. Of those, the most popular and affordable are NTAG203 Tags which work great and have about 137 bytes of usable memory. This will be enough for almost any NFC App EXCEPT the official Tectile App which uses way more memory than it should. I'd suggest not using the Tectile app - there are many better NFC apps!
The 137 bytes on the NTAG203 tags is also enough to create a basic contact sharing tag with Name/Business/Email/Phone, but if you're wanting a full business card with name/business name/street address/website/email/phone/etc then 137 bytes probably won't cut it. (TIP: Install the NFC by MOO app - type in all the info you want on the tag and see how many bytes you need BEFORE buying).
Another tag that is gaining popularity is the Topaz 512 which is also fully compatible with ALL NFC phones and has 512 bytes of actual memory and about 480 bytes of usable memory. This should suffice for the Samsung Tectile app as well as holding all your business info. However, these are more expensive than the NTAG203 tags and will be overkill for most applications as the NTAG203's have plenty of memory for most task launchers or basic contact info.
There are other NFC Chip formats out there - any that adhere to the NFC Forums Type 1 or Type 2 compatibility protocols will work with the Galaxy S4. But based on what's readily available and popular the main thing to remember is that Mifare Classic Tags are NOT compatible with the S4; NTAG203 Tags and Topaz 512 Tags ARE fully compatible!
Hope this info proves helpful and keeps some people from wasting money on tags that aren't compatible.
Found this out the hard way. I have a bunch of mifare tags that I used pretty extensively with my skyrocket and my express and they just plain don't work with the s4. You just get an error that says "tag not supported."
Thanks for the additional info. If you search the forums you will see that there is already a couple of informative threads about this issue but more information is always welcome.
I wish I found this earlier .. I bought 5 tags off ebay and their the Mifare tags and just tried them out on my GS4 with no luck, good job they didnt cost much.
Thanks for the info about which tags actually work with GS4:good:
I used tectiles on my S3 and it was a bummer to find out it does not work with my S4. Thanks for the info :good:
Yeah....tagsfordroid are NOT compatible either. Lol. I got 10 cool stickers anyway.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
sd_N said:
Yeah....tagsfordroid are NOT compatible either. Lol. I got 10 cool stickers anyway.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not true. TagsforDroid sells NFC tags that are compatible with S4s, you just can't use the Mifare tags (as has been explained).
Ok, since this is the general forum, Im gonna ask a newb question... what can a user do with a NFC tag? I thought they were the type of things that I can just wave my phone at in starbucks to buy a cup of coffee with, but Im guessing they are something else altogether?
scott14719 said:
This is not true. TagsforDroid sells NFC tags that are compatible with S4s, you just can't use the Mifare tags (as has been explained).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK...thanks for the info. I thought they sold only one type. Haven't checked back with them since the new NFC stuff. Appreciate the heads up.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
I just wrote toggle mobile data on/off, Wi-Fi on/off blocking mode on/off, & auto sync on/off using one NFC chip. These things are nice. I did not use Samsung's model.
I use tags from tagstand.com with my S4 in conjunction with the NFC task launcher app. They are compatible.
P.S. This thread should be under Accessories.
schollianmj said:
Ok, since this is the general forum, Im gonna ask a newb question... what can a user do with a NFC tag? I thought they were the type of things that I can just wave my phone at in starbucks to buy a cup of coffee with, but Im guessing they are something else altogether?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To put it short, they are little tags with chips in them that u can program on ur phone and when u place ur phone next to them it automate tasks on your phone, like I want my gps to turn on and my navigation to open up all without touching/pressing any buttons. so I can stick one of these on my car cradle and when I dock it, it does the tasks. But theres many other things u can use them for.. these have a few ideas
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1867596
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4gRrh0OCME
NFC Cover
Do you need NFC cover to make it work like on Note 2?
morow said:
Do you need NFC cover to make it work like on Note 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not for the Galaxy S4...cus its built into the phone already
edit..actually the Note 2 shouldnt need a cover too because its built into that as well
NFC Cover
sonyman81 said:
not for the Galaxy S4...cus its built into the phone already
edit..actually the Note 2 shouldnt need a cover too because its built into that as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. My girlfriend has a Note 2 and she bought the flip cover with the NFC, I thought you have to have a cover with the NFC to make it work.
sonyman81 said:
not for the Galaxy S4...cus its built into the phone already
edit..actually the Note 2 shouldnt need a cover too because its built into that as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just fyi, the note 2 comes with the nfc antenna attached to the battery cover i.e. it is not built into the phone.
suchevent said:
just fyi, the note 2 comes with the nfc antenna attached to the battery cover i.e. it is not built into the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right. But hey we are on the s4 not the note 2. Its unrelated to what he wants to know. Ill post a link in a few of the tags I got. 7$ for 10 of them. And it was $2.99 shipping. Comes from Canada. https://www.tagger.ca/shop/
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
oh right..didnt know, I dont own a note 2....I just looked it up on wiki and it said it had nfc so I assumed it was built in, my bad...thx for correcting me
Good info here. Thanks.
sonyman81 said:
oh right..didnt know, I dont own a note 2....I just looked it up on wiki and it said it had nfc so I assumed it was built in, my bad...thx for correcting me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you're thinking of the wireless charging Qi.

NOTE III has built in ANT+ support! (Breaking News so to say:)

I believe this is an important fact, however for some reason, there was no mention of this in any of Samsung's stage intros, news reports, or even spec sheets and even any Note 3 reviews.
How can such a big company with an enormous marketing department fail so miserably.
Its is a far more useful feature that the infrared which is mentioned. Also in the current days its even way more practical than the smart-watch they made (which in all honesty has not real life practical use if you have a phone and a BT headset. And without a phone it cant even function on its own).
Anyway it is good (now confirmed) news, not matter the blunder, That Note 3 does in-fact support ANT+
http://www.thisisant.com/news/ant-has-been-integrated-in-samsung-galaxy-note-3
I personally only realized it when and end user reported it in a forum which I follow.
Why they (Samsung) should play this so lowkey I will never understand. I am almost certain that this is going to be news to a lot of the people who worked on the GN3. And its not even funny.
So many sports/fitness people can make good use of it.
It seems to be working on all versions of Note 3 (SD800 I was sure, but a used reported that his equinox also has ANT+). I have to confess that this later part still has me wondering, as it is know that the Snapdragon has had integrated ANT on its chips for a long time (its not something that Samsung added by itself, hence you have it on the Sony Z Ultra also and if rumors are right then the S4 will support it with the next firmware upgrade), but I never heard (till this day) of an equinox that did support this. Doesn't really make sense. You can do a search on google with SD/qualcomm and ANT and you will return positive results. Qualcomm is a part of the alliance. How ever if you do the same for equinoxx you wont find any thing, not a single thing!.
All in all I am very happy. As I dont have to trash my Wahoo speed and cadence sensor. Just to buy a BTLE version of this, to which the android support is still shady and continues to disconnect according to current users. Also very few apps have BTLE enabled for android (As they really waisted time getting here). I think officially so far, only Runtastic pro has in integrated.
However a lot of apps have ANT+ support, as that has been with android since the (Sony Xperia pioneered) 2011 days. If you have problems connecting your ANT device to Note 3, then try this universal connection manager: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.iforpowell.android.ipantman it works with any ANT sports app, not just the developers own. Also lets multiple apps use data from the same ANT device. Basically a must have!
There are very many sensors to choose from, all now compatible with the GN3: http://www.thisisant.com/directory you can filter at the side.
A little background on ANT (as I can see from the replies, that a lot of people are like "ok, but what is ANT?"):
For those that are new to this. ANT+ is a wireless protocol that is similar to Bluetooth, actually more like Bluetooth LE. It is usually found on sport monitors/sensors like a heart rate sensor and is used mostly to transfer information to a reviver/logger, like a "bike computer" (things like speed, cadence, power, pulse, etc).
ANT+ has a wide list of compatible equipment (as its older than BTLE). Formally you needed to buy an expensive receiver/computer (like Garmin) for $400. Now you can use your phone to do this for free and even do it better (as the phones can do much more and has many options for apps/customization.). Also you can simultaneously navigate a map, take calls, listen to music, etc. All-in-one.
See these for any example of ANT+ compatible Android app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.strava or https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.endomondo.android both of which, as you can see are very popular. Most of this really became popular with the Sony Xperia Active, which is water, dust and damage proof, so people didn't mind mounting it on their bikes.
Basically you dont need ant to use these apps. The built in GPS on these phone can do wonders (tell you speed, elevation, position). But if you want even more detail and also you wan these details to be more precise, then that is where these sensors come into play.
Ok. Now I know some people might have the feeling, that they have been "living under a cave". Don't feel bad. I too didn't know anything about all this about a year ago. That was when I dusted off my bike in the cellar. As I was getting too fat
Some examples in use:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I saw the app getting an update when i first got my N9005 few days ago, then i looked it up on google and i too was amazed to see that Samsung had missed it :/
Sent from my SM-N9005
I just dont get it....
Ather said:
I saw the app getting an update when i first got my N9005 few days ago, then i looked it up on google and i too was amazed to see that Samsung had missed it :/
Sent from my SM-N9005
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So weird: If you do a search for Note 3 and ANT+ on google then all you get is the Sept 5th report from thisisant.com site that I linked and few tech news channels that echoed it the same day or the next. That is all.
So you have Qualcomm then, right? That confirms my supervision.
oalex said:
I am sorry if this has been mentioned, but I cant find any tread referring to it.
I believe this is an important fact, how ever for some reason, there was no mention of this in any of Samsung's stage intros, news reports. If I am correct samsung even forgot to mention it on the spec sheets.
I also read most reviews out there about the Note III and none of then mentioned anything about it.
http://www.thisisant.com/news/ant-has-been-integrated-in-samsung-galaxy-note-3
I personally only realized it when and end user reported it in a forum which I follow, that he revived his Note 3 and it paired with his ANT+ device.
Why should the play this on low-key, it a more important feature that a lot of other things that are published.
So many sports/fitness people can make good use of it.
I suspect that it might be limited to one version only, that is either Exynos or Qualcomm. Still looking for specifics, maybe someone can shed some light on this.
(I think Qualcomm is the winner here too?? as those have had this feature in Sony Ericsson Xperia and Motorola in the past)
All in all I am very happy. As I dont have to trash my Wahoo speed and cadence sensor. Just to by a BTLE version of which the android support is still shady and continues to disconnect according to current users. Also very few apps have BT LE enadled for android (As they really waisted time getting here). I think officially so far only Runtastic pro has in integrated. However a lot of apps have ANT+ support, as that has been with android since the Sony Xperia 2011 days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you've just educated me on a feature that I love but had no idea what it was..
I downloaded an update for the ant+ software just last night..
Now excuse me while I go off to find and ant+ compatible heart rate monitor to pair with my UK N9005..
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 4
I think all version of the N3 have ant. My Garmin HR monitor works with the ant app. And my N3
randpost said:
I think all version of the N3 have ant. My Garmin HR monitor works with the ant app. And my N3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have N9000? OR you read it somewhere?
I never saw anything indicate that Exynos eve had/has ANT support.
thanks this is really good news for me.. I just want some more information as to which version has the ant+ support. I just sold my wahoo rflkt and bluesc. I replaced it with a garmin edge 500 and was thinking about getting the footpod for running so this will be great if I don't need a key. This was one of the biggest problems for me switching to android that I had to switch out all my sensors because they aren't supported yet.
I emailed them via thisisant page asking which variants had ant and they said all variants. This was a week ago. I have N900T.
Impuls3101 said:
thanks this is really good news for me.. I just want some more information as to which version has the ant+ support. I just sold my wahoo rflkt and bluesc. I replaced it with a garmin edge 500 and was thinking about getting the footpod for running so this will be great if I don't need a key. This was one of the biggest problems for me switching to android that I had to switch out all my sensors because they aren't supported yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is exactly the story of my life. I had to buy a stupid OTG cable and mini USB ant dongle. All which made it impossible to put the note in the mount that I had.
Also heart rate monitor is normal bluetooth which only lasted 4 weeks (Ant would last 6 months).
So far it seems that N9005 is 100% confirmed. Also this is what makes sense (looking at the chip manufacturer).
I am yet to see any info on N9000.
EDIT: Randpost (post above this one) got an email from THISISANT clamming that all versions support ANT+. This would even better news if its true. Lets hope we see more confirmation.
oalex said:
So you have Qualcomm then, right? That confirms my supervision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the N9005 is the qualcomm snapdragon version
Sent from my SM-N9005
---------- Post added at 12:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:16 PM ----------
Also if you see this page, it lists Samsung Galaxy Note 3 as a compatible device..
http://www.thisisant.com/directory
Sent from my SM-N9005
---------- Post added at 12:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 PM ----------
http://www.thisisant.com/directory/galaxy-note-3/
Sent from my SM-N9005
i've got n9005 note 3 lte ,my problem is i have polar h/r with strap..!! bad luck.!!
and to use note 3 h/r app , i have to get garmin or other,for about 100 dollars extra !!
took screenshot of compatible straps and monitor, as listed in S health app. on Note 3
willcor said:
i've got n9005 note 3 lte ,my problem is i have polar h/r with strap..!! bad luck.!!
and to use note 3 h/r app , i have to get garmin or other,for about 100 dollars extra !!
took screenshot of compatible straps and monitor, as listed in S health app. on Note 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry Willcor, but you have some stuff mixed up.
Polar doesn't have anything that is ANT+ compatible. The have either Bluetooth or thier own "WIND" system.
Anything that has ANT+ written on it and is a sensor of some sort should be compatible with Note III.
Here is a comprehensive list of ANT+ sensors. Just fillter at the side, for what you want (eg cycling).
http://www.thisisant.com/directory
ANT+ is in this way different from BT. If you have say Endomondo app or Strava (or many other) apps from appstore then no mater what ANT HRM you use, it will work. ITs not connecting directly to the app, but rather to the ANT service on android which is universal.
Ray Maker of DC Rainmaker on Twitter reports ANT+ is coming to the Samsung Galaxy S4 through an October Firmware update and will be supported on all flagship devices going into the future
dcrainmakerblog
"We will support ANT+ in the Galaxy S4 in a firmware update coming in October" - Samsung (at the ANT+ Symposium)
dcrainmakerblog
"We do plan to support ANT+ on all of our flagship smartphone devices in the future" - Samsung (at the ANT+ Symposium)
Hell, got full set of ANT+ device and bougut a BTLE HR for note3... complete fail
And the saddest part for you wm2001 is that BTLE support is still veru buggy (no reconnect after disconnect) and most of the sports app dont yet support it. I think so far only runtastic and ipbike.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
BTW I say again, the fail is on Samsungs part. I still can't get my head around it how such an omission can happen with all the marketing personal that they have.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
oalex said:
And the saddest part for you wm2001 is that BTLE support is still veru buggy (no reconnect after disconnect) and most of the sports app dont yet support it. I think so far only runtastic and ipbike.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still on its way to deliver to me. My questions is, is the ANT support any better than BTLE?
wm2001wm2001 said:
Still on its way to deliver to me. My questions is, is the ANT support any better than BTLE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the ANT Radio Service is unified across all phones with ANT including the Sony Xperia line I'd say there's a decent number of good reviews on it so far, but let's see what the Note 3 people say for awhile.
oalex said:
Sorry Willcor, but you have some stuff mixed up.
Polar doesn't have anything that is ANT+ compatible. The have either Bluetooth or thier own "WIND" system.
Anything that has ANT+ written on it and is a sensor of some sort should be compatible with Note III.
Here is a comprehensive list of ANT+ sensors. Just fillter at the side, for what you want (eg cycling).
http://www.thisisant.com/directory
ANT+ is in this way different from BT. If you have say Endomondo app or Strava (or many other) apps from appstore then no mater what ANT HRM you use, it will work. ITs not connecting directly to the app, but rather to the ANT service on android which is universal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, but you misread my post !!
( so i guess you have got it mixed up...!! not me..!!)
.That is what i was implying... polar, is not compatible( either ant+ or otherwise) and now i must fork out 100 dollars for compatible strap (ant+.....whatever make and monitor ! to work with S health app )
anyway, thank you for your reply.!!
Sorry if you got confused, with my cryptic post,...!!
Anyone try this with the n3 yet? If so how does it work? I'm thinking about getting a watch with a heart rate monitor and maybe some other features.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk 4

SBeam

Was this removed from Samsung phones? I only see android beam now.
Aww what, hopefully not. That's a good feature. Haven't gotten mine yet so can't check.
I guess it's just called android beam now because my my note 5 and note 3 beam files to each other without any issues
Mac842 said:
I guess it's just called android beam now because my my note 5 and note 3 beam files to each other without any issues
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was always android beam, but S Beam used to utilize WiFi direct which allowed me to transfer a movie of like 1.5 GB in 1 minute. I don't think android beam uses that.
Dovigoldberger said:
There was always android beam, but S Beam used to utilize WiFi direct which allowed me to transfer a movie of like 1.5 GB in 1 minute. I don't think android beam uses that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android Beam uses Bluetooth, which is painfully slow compared to S Beam which used WiFi-Direct. My s4 has S Beam, and it's an incredibly useful feature, especially considering how large photo and video files are getting now. I can't find where to enable S Beam on my Note 5 (Verizon) which is a huge disappointment, and the only problem I have with my new device. So Beam is orders of magnitude faster than Android Beam. All of the hardware is onboard, so I'm hoping it's an oversight that'll be fixed soon.
Wifi direct is present inside wifi menu near MORE button and works great. I guess they just dropped the name of S beam to avoid confusion with android beam.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Yup, no more s beam. Wifi direct gets the job done for large files or lots of pics though.

Categories

Resources