Although these numbers are kind of inaccurate, I got a 3214 on the Quadrant using Raver's Octaine 2.0 and Overclocking to 1.3.
In other words, my phone has gone SSJ.
Nice! Sounds like you have a good ROM with good performance!
Quadrant means absolutely nothing.
yentlequible said:
Quadrant means absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What Benchmark is the preferable one for our phone?
I think AnTuTu is a better benchmark. I've heard that Quadrant isn't optimized for the Hummingbird.
Yeah it may be more accurate but Its a nice ego boost to see that big orange bar at the top in Quadrant
Related
What is the best "Benchmark" testing app out there? I see people testing their Quadrant scores after the lag fix, and I was wondering what app they are using to test it?
Thanks in advance.
Gr8Danes said:
What is the best "Benchmark" testing app out there? I see people testing their Quadrant scores after the lag fix, and I was wondering what app they are using to test it?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant
Linpack is another benchmarking application.
Quadrant is the one you see most people use. Linpack test mflops, Neo Core test FPS (frames per second). Those are just a few people use, I have them on mine to compare between what I do and my wifes.
Quadrant is useless. As proven in all the speed hacks, its not a good indicator.
From cyanogen today:
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/21313672502
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/21313718922
Please, this has nothing to do with "ANDROID DEVELOPMENT."
People need to stop making stupid topics like this in the wrong area.
lol quadrant scores the app is called Quadrant Standard i think
I was running scores of over 2k each run.. running perfect storm 1.3v and bamf 4.3b kernel. I updated to 4.42. Delete the cache in setup CPU.. and auto set it to abt 1400+ now my phone is constantly running in he 1700 quadrant... Someone please help..
edit* sometimes when i run quadrant the cpu section won't even calculate and jumps directly to the second test... omg
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
MisterDonut said:
I was running scores of over 2k each run.. running perfect storm 1.3v and bamf 4.3b kernel. I updated to 4.42. Delete the cache in setup CPU.. and auto set it to abt 1400+ now my phone is constantly running in he 1700 quadrant... Someone please help..
edit* sometimes when i run quadrant the cpu section won't even calculate and jumps directly to the second test... omg
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you so concerned with what Quadrant says? Your last paragraph sounds as though you spend hours running Quadrant over and over lol. Just enjoy the phone!
this is my first android, so i'm seeing how every rom and every kernel can effect the the speed.. but now i'm running sub scores, and i feel like maybe this kernel isn't as good.. i tried flashing back to 4.3b.. but no luck, i feel like there is something wrong with the phone
When you are flashing are you doing a factory wipe, cache wipe and dalvik wipe. That may help. As for the 1700 that is what I am getting on a cleaned stock rooted rom. My phone is fast. Once you get into overclocking I feel it effects the life on the phone, but that is just my opinion.
Chalup said:
Why are you so concerned with what Quadrant says? Your last paragraph sounds as though you spend hours running Quadrant over and over lol. Just enjoy the phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thus has gotten misinterpreted on the web. Quadrant scores are meaningless between devices. One phone could get low scores but be optimized to run smooth and fast. While some other device could get high scores but be optimized poorly and run bad.
HOWEVER, scores do have meaning compared within the same phone model. A thunderbolt vs thunderbolt has meaning. It foes show the performance of how well the phone can do tasks like dcriol a list, crunch thru some JavaScript or HTML, or load a game.
I see everyone say benchmark test scores are meaningless, and that original statement meant "meaningless between different models", but not comparing within the same model.
A nexus one on gingerbread only gets 1000 on quadrant, and its slower and choppy scrolling lists. But the nexus one on froyo gets 1650 easily, and froyo was way smoother scrolling lists etc. The lower score shows its reduced performance ability to do various tasks, and it shows in actual use.
RogerPodacter said:
Thus has gotten misinterpreted on the web. Quadrant scores are meaningless between devices. One phone could get low scores but be optimized to run smooth and fast. While some other device could get high scores but be optimized poorly and run bad.
HOWEVER, scores do have meaning compared within the same phone model. A thunderbolt vs thunderbolt has meaning. It foes show the performance of how well the phone can do tasks like dcriol a list, crunch thru some JavaScript or HTML, or load a game.
I see everyone say benchmark test scores are meaningless, and that original statement meant "meaningless between different models", but not comparing within the same model.
A nexus one on gingerbread only gets 1000 on quadrant, and its slower and choppy scrolling lists. But the nexus one on froyo gets 1650 easily, and froyo was way smoother scrolling lists etc. The lower score shows its reduced performance ability to do various tasks, and it shows in actual use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true but some kernels have various tweaks that can inflate quadrant scores...also on the droid x you could blow up quadrant by disabling stage fright. these phones are so fast it's hard to tell the difference. i've tested just about every kernel and overclocked all the way to 2.06 and the phone goes from really fast... to really really fast... to overheating and unstable lol
i use linpack and cpu benchmark to compare kernels and overclock/governor settings...pretty much gave up on quadrant
Quadrant means nothing... If you can run this piss out of your phone and not make it stall... Its fast enough.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
I wipe cache and devlic
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
MisterDonut said:
I wipe cache and devlic
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That should be good. I agree that something about that kernel might be suspect.
If you're bored, try the kernel that I'm running. Option to overclock to 1.4 or 1.9 depending on which you select, Good battery life, and stable. 1.4 gets 23XX on quad and the 1.9 gets people 2700-3000. No cheating too.
Here are my results for all three benchmarks right after I killed my Tasks
Im running KC1 and using tegrak Overclock to 1.3
Post what yah got.
btw, I noticed alot of other folks posting up multi-colored quandrant results. Is there another app that I should be using?
fknfocused said:
Here are my results for all three benchmarks right after I killed my Tasks
Im running KC1 and using tegrak Overclock to 1.3
Post what yah got.
btw, I noticed alot of other folks posting up multi-colored quandrant results. Is there another app that I should be using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant Advanced provides the breakdown for each individual area (multi-colored).
http://slideme.org/application/quadrant-advanced
The thing about quadrant however, is it's not optimized or suited for the processor in our phones (Hummingbird). It was designed for snapdragon processors.
Additionally, Quadrant is sub par in my opinion on benchmark test apps (even though it's well known) because it does operations that aren't typical. If you get advanced you'll see that it does like 60% all IO operations, however thats a really strange test because it would be like you running a full on database on your phone.
So the scenarios and tests it runs are not representative of the scenarios you are going to use your phone to perform.
I like SmartBench better because it gives you an index for Gaming and Productivity.
Samsung Galaxy S 4G's will slightly outperform the snapdragon/adreno combo that you see in the MT4G etc. Very slight advantage. In regard to productivity it does well too.
Thanks for the info Joe, Im new to all of this and ran accross benchmarks so I tried it. It was something else to do while I await the almighty CWM. haha
fknfocused said:
Thanks for the info Joe, Im new to all of this and ran accross benchmarks so I tried it. It was something else to do while I await the almighty CWM. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries it was one of those things where I was bummed that my wife's MT4G was triple the score on my SGS4G so I investigated haha.
Yep same here . It's real close from what I can tell.
I tested 3 times just to check if there could be an error but it isn't , my antutu scores show i9003 (XXKB3 fw) to be higher than i9000.
Feels good but wondering how is it possible since all I have been reading that i9000 has better hardware than i9003.
In the bar chart it shows as My device:2083, what does that mean?
It will be higher, because you have applied lag fix which increases the database score dramatically. Hence . You would get a normal database i/o score of around 100.
Hmm great I wil also try
Antutu score without lag fix will be 2000 and above in sgs sl. We have already published our scores in rex.s thread. Lag fix improves only quadrant score by twice. Yes, our scores are higher than sgs.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
But it has been already said that lagfix can only improve the antutu benchmark score and nothing else? Is that so?
@sgsl
Did u tried uninstalling lagfix? I think many are having trouble in uninstalling it.
Hmm for undo the lagfix the hard reset or factory reset will be the option and I have also tried to undo it but it says playlogos.bin is not found so to undo ther lagfix I have to hard reset my phone
Did u tried uninstalling lagfix? I think many are having trouble in uninstalling it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i didn't try removing it, but read here on xda forum about the playlogos.bin, in one of those thread someone discussed a root application which could restore the playlogos.bin & then you can remove the lagfix.
I cant find that thread as of now but do remember that the app was some kind of root tool or root file manager.
Otherwise the only method left is hard reset or factory reset.
No dude, it does not improve antutu score. My personal experience is lagfix only improves quadrant scores. Further These scores have no relationship with improvement of user interface and fluid experience. So no point in using lag fix.
@sgs not sure if factory reset can remove lag fix. The only way may be to reflash.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
Just to reverify, I ran antutu, now, my score is 1955. slightly low compared to yours. The difference is in I/O SCORE, which is slightly higher sure to lagfix. But for quadrant score doubles after applyong lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
This means nothing, as does quadrant scores..
Can you also post the screenshots of benchmark figures (2nd screenshot) as it will tell why the difference exist.
Tried from xda app. But failed, I do not have access to pc now will upload in the evening.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
My Score
my score on antutu is 2092
You have applied lag fix, my I/O is 85 without lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
what does I/O mean?
sgsI9003 said:
what does I/O mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Input and output operations per second. It means how much data can be fetched from a database and stored to it in one second of operation
is it normal?
my antutu score is 2531 without applying any lagfix or any graphics improvement patch!
its just a new phone with not much tweaks!
3D graphics score was 794!
build: froyo DDKF1
Antutu or Quadrant dont really mean anything? And, 2531 is totally normal..Don't worry
okk
well i thought the same..did the test just for fun..
as far as gaming(gpu) of sl is concerned..i think its pretty decent! not that bad as much people say about it
max_rockzz said:
okk
well i thought the same..did the test just for fun..
as far as gaming(gpu) of sl is concerned..i think its pretty decent! not that bad as much people say about it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think, you would switch to a GB ROM. It gives you better scores and is pretty fast!
Hi all, first time posting and sorry if this has been asked before. I am running cm7 nightly and have recently tried the quadrant benchmark and am getting some pretty low scores. I know these builds are not stable but even so the scores are low. getting mid 1600s and I have seen other around 2200. is this just because of the cm7 build? thanks.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
Install this kernel, overclock to 12-1300mhz and try again.
wow sweet! bumped to 1200 and ran a 2000 on quadrant. what's the most the captivate CPU can handle?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
Can't really say much for Quadrant, as I haven't run it in forever, but I run 1.5ghz stable 24/7 on cm7 w/ glitch. Runs buttery smooth through pretty much any app.
I've kinda been out of the loop in regards to the Captivate, but afaik max clock is 1.6.
I heard something about shao doing a 1.8 kernel, but again, idk how true it is or anything, and I'm lax in time, so I can't really research lol.
yea i see the option to run at 1.6 just didnt know if it was safe to do so. I bet 1.5 runs smooth. Thanks.
Quadrant is nothing of a benchmark, the hummingbird kernel isn't even read correctly. On the CM7 forum I've mentioned this before. Basing everything off a quadrant score is complete in the redundant theory, try using a real benchmark, suggestion.
Smartbench> quadrant
Sent from I'm sure glad Danger went under, else I'd still be on a Mr.Cartoon SK2.
As stated above. Don't put to much into scores. Judge by real world feel. I can show you a Rom that scores almost 3000 on quadrant but runs like crap. Trust your judgement. As for overclocking, it is device dependent. My cap couldn't handle anything over 1.3.
And yes all this has been stated before. A search would have saved you some time.
Thread closed