DroidX vs Pentium 4 vs Core i7 vs? - General Questions and Answers

Can someone run the nbench benchmark for Android on your Smartphone for the the following processors and post the results?
a. Snapdragon
b. dual core
c. quad core
I am attaching results for the DroidX (TI OMAP processor), Pentium4, and Intel Core i7 processors.
Thanks!
DroidX:
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 287.25 : 7.37 : 2.42
STRING SORT : 15.221 : 6.80 : 1.05
BITFIELD : 1.0633e+08 : 18.24 : 3.81
FP EMULATION : 36.604 : 17.56 : 4.05
FOURIER : 1988.7 : 2.26 : 1.27
ASSIGNMENT : 7.5206 : 28.62 : 7.42
IDEA : 1106.4 : 16.92 : 5.02
HUFFMAN : 546.36 : 15.15 : 4.84
NEURAL NET : 0.72323 : 1.16 : 0.49
LU DECOMPOSITION : 19.178 : 0.99 : 0.72
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 14.223
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.377
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l)
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 2.6.32.9-g34b306d ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.0 (GCC) ) #2 PREEMPT Mon Jun 27 14:02:56 PDT 2011
C compiler : arm-eabi-gcc (GCC) 4.4.0
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 3.099
INTEGER INDEX : 3.929
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 0.764
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
Pentium 4:
$ nbench
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 755.2 : 19.37 : 6.36
STRING SORT : 55.098 : 24.62 : 3.81
BITFIELD : 3.2889e+08 : 56.42 : 11.78
FP EMULATION : 53.576 : 25.71 : 5.93
FOURIER : 15931 : 18.12 : 10.18
ASSIGNMENT : 23.567 : 89.67 : 23.26
IDEA : 1226.8 : 18.76 : 5.57
HUFFMAN : 1216.6 : 33.74 : 10.77
NEURAL NET : 20.096 : 32.28 : 13.58
LU DECOMPOSITION : 922.08 : 47.77 : 34.49
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 32.615
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 30.343
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : Dual GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz 3000MHz
L2 Cache : 2048 KB
OS : Linux 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5
C compiler : i586-pld-linux-gcc
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 10.146
INTEGER INDEX : 6.898
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 16.829
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
Core i7 (using just 1 of the 8 cores):
$ nbench
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 1766.7 : 45.31 : 14.88
STRING SORT : 358.32 : 160.11 : 24.78
BITFIELD : 6.2146e+08 : 106.60 : 22.27
FP EMULATION : 129.24 : 62.02 : 14.31
FOURIER : 43128 : 49.05 : 27.55
ASSIGNMENT : 54.178 : 206.16 : 53.47
IDEA : 3211 : 49.11 : 14.58
HUFFMAN : 2370.5 : 65.73 : 20.99
NEURAL NET : 60.416 : 97.05 : 40.82
LU DECOMPOSITION : 2661.4 : 137.87 : 99.56
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 84.947
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 86.901
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : 8 CPU GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz 1600MHz
L2 Cache : 8192 KB
OS : Linux 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5
C compiler : i586-pld-linux-gcc
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 30.901
INTEGER INDEX : 15.978
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 48.199
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
Sent from an unrooted DroidX using XDA app.

reeout tous
Hi!
I've udpated the Android NBench with Amd v7 optimizations.
The Android results should be much better now (esp. float)
And note that nbench is a single core benchmark.
Also you'll find lots of results here: tux.org /~mayer/linux/results2.html
BR,
LD
---------- Post added at 03:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:38 PM ----------
For example on my old Droid 1 (OMAP @800Mhz), with the new benchmark, I get:
MEMORY INDEX : 3.104
INTEGER INDEX : 3.618
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.396
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 372.19 : 9.54 : 3.13
STRING SORT : 19.994 : 8.93 : 1.38
BITFIELD : 1.1103e+08 : 19.05 : 3.98
FP EMULATION : 26.687 : 12.81 : 2.95
FOURIER : 1753.1 : 1.99 : 1.12
ASSIGNMENT : 5.5105 : 20.97 : 5.44
IDEA : 877.23 : 13.42 : 3.98
HUFFMAN : 524.48 : 14.54 : 4.64
NEURAL NET : 1.6317 : 2.62 : 1.10
LU DECOMPOSITION : 58.843 : 3.05 : 2.20
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 13.578
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.516
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l) 800MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 2.6.32.9 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.0 (GCC) ) #1 PREEMPT Tue Mar 1 19:09:32 BRT 2011
C compiler : gcc 4.4.3 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 3.104
INTEGER INDEX : 3.618
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.396
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
---------- Post added at 03:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 PM ----------
And on my Xperia pro (Snapdragon @1GHz):
MEMORY INDEX : 3.383
INTEGER INDEX : 4.786
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 4.194
So the Snapdragon is much faster than the OMAP for floating point operations, which is good for 3d games
-----------------
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 468.45 : 12.01 : 3.95
STRING SORT : 18.174 : 8.12 : 1.26
BITFIELD : 1.241e+08 : 21.29 : 4.45
FP EMULATION : 33.461 : 16.06 : 3.70
FOURIER : 4077.7 : 4.64 : 2.60
ASSIGNMENT : 7.0194 : 26.71 : 6.93
IDEA : 1312.1 : 20.07 : 5.96
HUFFMAN : 680.37 : 18.87 : 6.02
NEURAL NET : 4.7144 : 7.57 : 3.19
LU DECOMPOSITION : 237.72 : 12.32 : 8.89
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 16.530
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 7.563
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) 1024MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 2.6.32.9-perf ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.3 (GCC) ) #1 PREEMPT Tue Apr 24 11:57:09 2012
C compiler : gcc 4.4.3 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 3.383
INTEGER INDEX : 4.786
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 4.194
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38

ldrolez said:
I've udpated the Android NBench with Amd v7 optimizations.
The Android results should be much better now (esp. float)
And note that nbench is a single core benchmark.
Also you'll find lots of results here: tux.org /~mayer/linux/results2.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for making nbench http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench available under Android! I've always wanted to compare mobile device computing power against desktop computing power (even though some people don't like to).
Sent from my unrooted DroidX using Tapatalk

Google/Asus Nexus 7 results:
using v1.0 of nbench:
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 638.91 : 16.39 : 5.38
STRING SORT : 29.165 : 13.03 : 2.02
BITFIELD : 1.6299e+08 : 27.96 : 5.84
FP EMULATION : 44.714 : 21.46 : 4.95
FOURIER : 9097.6 : 10.35 : 5.81
ASSIGNMENT : 8.5671 : 32.60 : 8.46
IDEA : 1638.1 : 25.05 : 7.44
HUFFMAN : 954.34 : 26.46 : 8.45
NEURAL NET : 8.9779 : 14.42 : 6.07
LU DECOMPOSITION : 349.95 : 18.13 : 13.09
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 22.330
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 13.934
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : 4 CPU ARMv7 Processor rev 9 (v7l) 1300MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.1.10-g52027f9 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 28 16:19:26 PDT 2012
C compiler : gcc 4.4.3 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 4.635
INTEGER INDEX : 6.397
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 7.728
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
using v1.1 of nbench:
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 634.21 : 16.26 : 5.34
STRING SORT : 29.752 : 13.29 : 2.06
BITFIELD : 2.1369e+08 : 36.66 : 7.66
FP EMULATION : 80.498 : 38.63 : 8.91
FOURIER : 9065.2 : 10.31 : 5.79
ASSIGNMENT : 8.5606 : 32.57 : 8.45
IDEA : 1859.3 : 28.44 : 8.44
HUFFMAN : 1014.1 : 28.12 : 8.98
NEURAL NET : 10.48 : 16.84 : 7.08
LU DECOMPOSITION : 347.35 : 17.99 : 12.99
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 25.974
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 14.617
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : 4 CPU ARMv7 Processor rev 9 (v7l) 1300MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.1.10-g009b6d1 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 26 12:53:01 PDT 2012
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 5.106
INTEGER INDEX : 7.751
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 8.107
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

Ran on my Galaxy S4 I9500:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

That Galaxy S4 looks faster than a Pentium 4. Is it stock or tweaked?

Updated stock DroidX results, using nbench v1.1:
(notice change from 3.0/3.9/0.7 in v1.0 to 3.8/5.7/1.7 in v1.1)
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 433.49 : 11.12 : 3.65
STRING SORT : 15.65 : 6.99 : 1.08
BITFIELD : 1.9417e+08 : 33.31 : 6.96
FP EMULATION : 60.418 : 28.99 : 6.69
FOURIER : 2111.7 : 2.40 : 1.35
ASSIGNMENT : 7.8546 : 29.89 : 7.75
IDEA : 1475.5 : 22.57 : 6.70
HUFFMAN : 746.28 : 20.69 : 6.61
NEURAL NET : 2.1485 : 3.45 : 1.45
LU DECOMPOSITION : 74.212 : 3.84 : 2.78
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 19.436
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 3.170
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) 1000MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 2.6.32.9-g1282440 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.0 (GCC) ) #1 PREEMPT Wed Jan 11 12:19:23 CST 2012
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 3.879
INTEGER INDEX : 5.735
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.758
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

Nexus 10 results: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=44240007

Android NBench Results google Nexus 4 4.3, Inc: eng.rascarlo.20130802.155926
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 44.719
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 24.628
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : 4 CPU ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) 1836MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.4.0-bricked-mako-exp-g73fe91e ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.7.2 20120910 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.7-2012.09) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 31 08:28:28 CEST 2013
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
MEMORY INDEX : 10.083
INTEGER INDEX : 12.041
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 13.659
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

nexus 4, at 1566mhz

Android 4.3 JWR66V google_sdk (API Level 18) emulator:
The emulator is running on an Intel Core i7 linux desktop PC.

2013 Nexus 7 nbench results:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=44847397
and
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=44847422

Motorola Moto X (XT1058), running stock 4.2.2 Build: 13.9.0Q2.X-116-LCX-26
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 44.242
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 30.979
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : Dual ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) 1728MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.4.42-xline-gfd1a699-00157-gfb2f8fc ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jul 18 20:25:42 CDT 2013
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
MEMORY INDEX : 10.593
INTEGER INDEX : 11.388
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 17.182
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38

My Samsung Galaxy S4 SGH-M919 results:
Why does the SGH-M919's 4 CPU ARMv7 rev0 (v71) Processor at 1890MHz produce lower benchmark numbers than the Samsumg I9500's rev3 (v71) at 1600MHz?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk

Samsung Galaxy S5 nbench results:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=52933881
Looks significantly faster than the S4.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk

Samsung Galaxy S7 SM-G930T:
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Amazon Fire 7 (5th Generation) :

Moto G 2014 CyanogenMod 13, HalogenKernel-R28
Last run:
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 578.43 : 14.83 : 4.87
STRING SORT : 63.393 : 28.33 : 4.38
BITFIELD : 1.7217e+08 : 29.53 : 6.17
FP EMULATION : 76.772 : 36.84 : 8.50
FOURIER : 7977.3 : 9.07 : 5.10
ASSIGNMENT : 10.149 : 38.62 : 10.02
IDEA : 2053.1 : 31.40 : 9.32
HUFFMAN : 912.32 : 25.30 : 8.08
NEURAL NET : 7.9416 : 12.76 : 5.37
LU DECOMPOSITION : 308.5 : 15.98 : 11.54
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 28.155
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 12.275
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : 4 CPU ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l) Qualcomm MSM8226 1593MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.4.42HalogenKernel-R28 ([email protected]) (gcc version 6.0.0 20160201 (experimental) (UBERTC-6.0.0) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 8 20:20:49 IST 2016
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
libc : Android Bionic libc
MEMORY INDEX : 6.471
INTEGER INDEX : 7.473
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 6.808
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38

Related

Galaxy "Y" vs. "Fit" comparison: GT-S5670 <--> GT-S5630

☆.☆ R & D thread ☆.☆
it seems that these two models are very similar.
Galaxy Y uses bcm21553 processor on totoro board.
partition information file is "totoro_0623.pit"
it would be interesting to discuss, which software is interchangeable among the two phones.
please post a dmesg output of CM Kernel system for comparison purposes.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1472
I really do appreciate the mod moving this post out of dev section, so it will escape the attention of most devs.
op. "IRON FIST" at it's best.
below is a dmesg from a Galaxy Y GT-S5360:
Linux version 2.6.35.7 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.4.1 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q3-68) ) #38 PREEMPT Wed Mar 21 21:46:02 IST 2012
CPU: ARMv6-compatible processor [4117b365] revision 5 (ARMv6TEJ), cr=00c5387f
CPU: VIPT aliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
Machine: BCM21553 ThunderbirdEDN31 platform
Memory policy: ECC disabled, Data cache writeback
On node 0 totalpages: 92672
Memory: 362MB = 362MB total
Memory: 295108k/295108k available, 75580k reserved, 0K highmem
Virtual kernel memory layout:
vector _: 0xffff0000 - 0xffff1000 ( 004 kB)
fixmap _: 0xfff00000 - 0xfffe0000 ( 896 kB)
DMA ____: 0xff000000 - 0xffe00000 ( 014 MB)
vmalloc : 0xd7000000 - 0xf0000000 ( 400 MB)
lowmem _: 0xc0000000 - 0xd6a00000 ( 362 MB)
pkmap __: 0xbfe00000 - 0xc0000000 ( 002 MB)
modules : 0xbf000000 - 0xbfe00000 ( 014 MB)
.init __: 0xc0008000 - 0xc003f000 ( 220 kB)
.text __: 0xc003f000 - 0xc0627000 (6048 kB)
.data __: 0xc0692000 - 0xc07066a0 ( 466 kB)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24637502&postcount=1
Hello Guys How Are you all,
when surfing and searching on the net, i found some phones that have the same board like the GALAXY Y GT-S5360 and this is the list :
--------------------------------THIS IS THE PHONES AT 833Mhz
Samsung GT-S5300 Galaxy Pocket : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Samsung GT-S5512 Galaxy Y Pro Duos : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Samsung GT-S6102 Galaxy Y Duos : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Samsung GT-S5360 Galaxy Y : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Samsung GT-B5510 Galaxy Y Pro / Galaxy Txt : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Samsung GT-S5570I Galaxy Pop/Mini : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
Newest 3G Smart Mobile Phone T616 : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 833MHz
--------------------------------THE ONLY ONE THAT HAVE 1Ghz
Newest 3G smart mobile phone T968 : CPU: 32bit Broadcom BCM21553, 1GHz
------------------------------------------------------
Samsung Galaxy Hardware Infos :
Here is the part of this topic where i will post any new infos about Samsung Galaxy Y.
And the Great New is The Galaxy Y have the latest technology From Broadcom .
Graphics GPU :
High-Quality display support up to HVGA Full HD Support 1080p.
8 Megapixel JPEG Camera with mipi serial interface.
VGA Enc/Dec Up to 30 frames per second H.264, MPEG-4, H.263 & WMV9 Video.
The Latest Technology From Broadcom VideoCore (TM) 4 Best then NOKIA N8.
CPU : 60nm ARM11 (not v6) Compatible ARMv6 Based on ARM Cortex A9. OpenGL 2.0 Hardware Acceleration, Integrated App Processor.
CHIPSET :
PMU : BCM59035
HSPA : BCM21553
2G/3G HS Transceiver : BCM2091
OPTIONS :
NFC : BCM20791
GPS/GLONASS : BCM47511
Mobile WLAN/BT/FM : BCM4330
This page is edited by me and sources links included.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VideoCore
does nobody in here know which CPU you have ???? wow.
Our specs:
Processor:
-Qualcomm MSM7227 (600 MHz) Arm v6l
32 bit, CPU Core: ARM1136EJ-S
Cortex-A Series
now we know
OK now this rumour is falsified, which was spreading on XDA about SGY//Fit compatibility. will save some bother. ty

[Q] [DEV]config.gz don't exist, compile modules, Fun Tab 7.0

Hi,
I want build custom modules for kernel, but my problem is that I can't find config.gz. I'm searching in few places on system but no result :/.
I need compile pl2303 driver for GPS USB. I need this solution because my device don't have bluetooth.
My device is Fun Tab 7.0 (specification: www[dot]orange[dot]pl/kid,4002009501,id,4002825896,title,Neostrada-z-tabletem,article.html (only in polish)).
I use this tutorial for compile drivers: android[dot]serverbox[dot]ch/?p=285
I try to configure kernel manually, but no result, module don't load due to version magic issue
Is another way to get kernel configuration?
Code:
cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.0.8 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.5.1 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2010.09-50) ) #5 PREEMPT Thu Aug 23 16:37:30 CST 2012
Code:
cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l)
BogoMIPS : 1001.88
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x3
CPU part : 0xc08
CPU revision : 2
Hardware : sun5i
Revision : 0000
Hello Mate.!
Did you find the answers for your question?
If yes, please let me know. Even I am looking for the same.

Fake or réal Android version

Hi developers,
How can I be sur that my phone Android version is real and not a fake build.prop modification ?
On my phone I have as result of uname -a 3.4 and cat /proc/version give me 3.0!
How can I be sur that my CPU is a MT6589 with 4 cores ?
Thank you for your help
Sent from my GT-N7102 using xda app-developers app
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=zausan.zdevicetest
p107r0 said:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=zausan.zdevicetest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your replu
I have tested this apps, but nothing that says, for my CPU, that is an MT6589 as the seller says ...
I have also tested some others semblable apps, but same result.
other thing : He says tha I have 2 GB oe RAM, but in information I have always 1.5 GB marked as used, on only less than 500 MB free : a lot for a smartphone!
other : the internal storage, must be 16 GB as saied by the seller, even with the basic system without any extra apps, less than 1 GB is free, and the all other space is used by the system !!
and he says also that the screen is 1280x720, but all hadware information apps says 960x540, except Antutu that says 1280x720, who beleive ?
what is the difference between "uname -a" and "cat /proc/version" ?
in a normal system it must gives the same result, but not mine :
Code:
[email protected]:/ # uname -a
Linux localhost 3.4.5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 13 12:29:44 CST 2013 armv7l GNU/Linux
Code:
[email protected]:/ # cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.0.31-178067 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 13 12:29:44 CST 2013
CPU info, in the kernel :
Code:
[email protected]:/ # cat /proc/cpu
cpu/ cpu_ss/ cpufreq/ cpuinfo
[email protected]:/ # cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
processor : 0
BogoMIPS : 2439.94
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x0
CPU part : 0xc07
CPU revision : 2
Hardware : SMDK4x12
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
As we see, only one processor (core) unlike what says other apps/seller
thank you for your help

Mx player pro not working on my Pantech Sky Vega No. 6

[ERROR] MX Player Pro 1.7.26
Mark Russel Castro - 10:51 am 1 - Attachments
to mxvideoplayer
=========================
Manufacturer: PANTECH
Model: IM-A860S
Brand: VEGA
Version: 4.1.2 (REL)
Build: VEGA/VEGA_IM-A860L/ef51l:4.1.2/JZO54K/IM-A860L.009:user/release-keys
Kernel: Linux version 3.4.0-perf-diszell2008-TekCafeTeam-VegaNO6-V1
([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC)
) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 5 22:33:51 ICT 2013
CPU: 4 core(s) 1.51 GHz (family:1 features:2047)
CPU architecture: 7
CPU features: swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4
Board platform: msm8960
Instruction set: armeabi-v7a (+armeabi)
Resolution: 1080 x 1848
Available screen size (DIP): 360 x 591 (smallest: 360)
Tablet: false
Screen size: Normal
Density: 3.0 (480)
Font scale: 1.15
Hardware main button: false
Locale: en_US
Total memory: 1920472 kB
Free memory: 244592 kB
=========================
Please describe the problem in detail.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
4.
When i play a video it's just stops/crashes
suddenly without any error message or
something,
Go install MX Log Collector. Run MX Player, recreate the issue. As soon as the error happens, go run MX Log Collector.
Post the results of the error log so we can take a look.

[Q] Intel 3735D e-star tablet - install windows??

Hellow, i have just received a tablet with intel quad core processor. It is verry similat to other chinese tablets which have windows and android dual boot. Is it possible to flash other firmware or to install just windows??
here is the debug info from cpuz:
CPUs : 4
SoCs : 1
CPU 0 : ARMv7 processor rev 1 (v7l)
Name : Intel 0x1
CPUs : 4
Core set 0 : Intel 0x1
Core set 0 Nb Cores : 4
Core set 0 Max Clock : 1826 MHz
Core set 0 Impl.id : 0x69
Core set 0 Arch.id : 0x7
Core set 0 Var.id : 1
Core set 0 Part.id : 0x1
Core set 0 Rev.id : 1
Core set 0 Revision : r1p1
Arch : 4x Intel 0x1 @1,83 GHz
Codename :
GPU Vendor : Intel
GPU Renderer : Intel(R) HD Graphics for BayTrail
Model : ota test (MID9768)
Manufacturer : eSTAR
Board : MID9768
Hardware : byt_t_ffrd10
Android Ver. : 4.2.2
Kernel Arch. : armv7
Battery capacity : 4000
--- CPUInfos ---
abi : armeabi-v7a
abi2 : armeabi
Processor : ARMv7 processor rev 1 (v7l)
BogoMIPS : 1500.0
Features : neon vfp swp half thumb fastmult edsp vfpv3
CPU implementer : 0x69
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x1
CPU part : 0x001
CPU revision : 1
Hardware : placeholder
Revision : 0001
Serial : 0000000000000001
--- Debug Infos ---
0=bq27441=30400
1=SoC_DTS0=25000
2=SoC_DTS1=25000
3=SYSTHERM0=30861
4=skin0=20724
5=skin1=29506
6=PMICDIE=34940
19=coretemp=-18000
clock0=1826000
clock1=1826000
clock2=1826000
clock3=1826000
anyone?? huh i belive i just need bios to flash it to my device....
vortexfoto said:
Hellow, i have just received a tablet with intel quad core processor. It is verry similat to other chinese tablets which have windows and android dual boot. Is it possible to flash other firmware or to install just windows??
here is the debug info from cpuz:
CPUs : 4
SoCs : 1
CPU 0 : ARMv7 processor rev 1 (v7l)
Name : Intel 0x1
CPUs : 4
Core set 0 : Intel 0x1
Core set 0 Nb Cores : 4
Core set 0 Max Clock : 1826 MHz
Core set 0 Impl.id : 0x69
Core set 0 Arch.id : 0x7
Core set 0 Var.id : 1
Core set 0 Part.id : 0x1
Core set 0 Rev.id : 1
Core set 0 Revision : r1p1
Arch : 4x Intel 0x1 @1,83 GHz
Codename :
GPU Vendor : Intel
GPU Renderer : Intel(R) HD Graphics for BayTrail
Model : ota test (MID9768)
Manufacturer : eSTAR
Board : MID9768
Hardware : byt_t_ffrd10
Android Ver. : 4.2.2
Kernel Arch. : armv7
Battery capacity : 4000
--- CPUInfos ---
abi : armeabi-v7a
abi2 : armeabi
Processor : ARMv7 processor rev 1 (v7l)
BogoMIPS : 1500.0
Features : neon vfp swp half thumb fastmult edsp vfpv3
CPU implementer : 0x69
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x1
CPU part : 0x001
CPU revision : 1
Hardware : placeholder
Revision : 0001
Serial : 0000000000000001
--- Debug Infos ---
0=bq27441=30400
1=SoC_DTS0=25000
2=SoC_DTS1=25000
3=SYSTHERM0=30861
4=skin0=20724
5=skin1=29506
6=PMICDIE=34940
19=coretemp=-18000
clock0=1826000
clock1=1826000
clock2=1826000
clock3=1826000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vortexfoto said:
anyone?? huh i belive i just need bios to flash it to my device....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bump, no answer at all, i tried myswlf but i cant get bios to work, i know this tablet is supported because they will soon release same tablet but with windows but they wont send me files :/

Categories

Resources