Database Info

[DEV] Kernel Source Request

Does anyone know where I can get hold of the 2.6.35.7 kernel source for the T959V?
I have looked on the Samsung OpenSource site, and it appears they only have the Froyo kernel source listed. I have also contacted Samsung two weeks ago, then again on Monday, and have not yet received a response.
If anyone has it, or knows how I can get it, please let me know; in case I'm missing something.
Thanks in advance!

nprussell said:
Does anyone know where I can get hold of the 2.6.35.7 kernel source for the T959V?
I have looked on the Samsung OpenSource site, and it appears they only have the Froyo kernel source listed. I have also contacted Samsung two weeks ago, then again on Monday, and have not yet received a response.
If anyone has it, or knows how I can get it, please let me know; in case I'm missing something.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source won't be released until we have an official gingerbread rom. Also Samsung has 60 days after official gingerbread releases to post the source code.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

Mod please close thread for wrong section!
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App

cnote74 said:
source won't be released until we have an official gingerbread rom. Also Samsung has 60 days after official gingerbread releases to post the source code.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ugh that means we could be waiting til october for source code.

[Q] Is there anyone running a "custom built" version of CM7 that they could share?

[Q] Is there anyone running a "custom built" version of CM7 that they could share?
Hi all...
I would like to try a CM7 ROM on my Infuse but I am in no way too technical to make my own from source so...
I am wondering if there is anyone here who has built a nice CM7 from source that could maybe share so I can give it a go???
I hope this is not too much to ask and I thank you in advance...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

Umm here is a version of CM7 we have had for a while now.

xIC-MACIx said:
Umm here is a version of CM7 we have had for a while now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response but i don't see a d/l link to a specific ROM.
Perhaps I am blind but that is what I'm looking for... a working version that someone has created from source that I can flash via CWM...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)

yiannisthegreek said:
Thanks for the response but i don't see a d/l link to a specific ROM.
Perhaps I am blind but that is what I'm looking for... a working version that someone has created from source that I can flash via CWM...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya I just got done looking myself, I could have sworn I saw a link in there somewhere, I guess not...

Cm7 builds sent aloud to be posted
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

Ya never looked into it till now, if I had a comp that could handle all of that and I had a better grasp on Linux, I would try building my own from the source.

xIC-MACIx said:
Ya never looked into it till now, if I had a comp that could handle all of that and I had a better grasp on Linux, I would try building my own from the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's my point exactly... I'd really like to try it but have no idea how to compile it on my own...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)

yiannisthegreek said:
That's my point exactly... I'd really like to try it but have no idea how to compile it on my own...
Sent from my SensatioN-al Hellraising Rogers Infuse SGH-I997R B-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look through the cm7 thread a few users have posted it. Just that others hate when they do so they discourage it on that thread because they don't want extra bug reports.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium

nelomen said:
If you look through the cm7 thread a few users have posted it. Just that others hate when they do so they discourage it on that thread because they don't want extra bug reports.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there is any they will get deleted read the op Linux doesn't want any releases on there strictly none.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

LG_iiNsTiiNcT said:
If there is any they will get deleted read the op Linux doesn't want any releases on there strictly none.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps then if someone can post it / them here it would be appreciated...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

yiannisthegreek said:
Perhaps then if someone can post it / them here it would be appreciated...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its not that he does not want it posted on that thread, he does not want it posted at all until it is finished.
If you look at other rom threads there are tons of questions that should not have been there. What he is doing is like a semi private beta, it will help fix problems faster without having to answer simple questions. Things like who do I flash this, will it work with this kernel, and such.
Now I am not saying that its not on the web but you will have to find it and not ask for a link.

I dedicated a virtual machine to building CM7, so I can pull from the source rep and do a snapshot build pretty much anytime.
Problem is that we are not supposed to share it. LinuxBozo posted somewhere why this restriction, but I don't recall the link. Maybe someone could remind what the url to that post is.
Adriano
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

People, if you want to share your own builds, I can't stop you. Hell, I don't even really care. I just ask if you do share, don't post them in the original thread, and make sure that whoever you are sharing with understands that this is currently not finished, has issues (especially with BT right now), and that unless they know what 'dmesg' and 'logcat' are, they will get absolutely no support from me and are on their own.

LinuxBozo said:
People, if you want to share your own builds, I can't stop you. Hell, I don't even really care. I just ask if you do share, don't post them in the original thread, and make sure that whoever you are sharing with understands that this is currently not finished, has issues (especially with BT right now), and that unless they know what 'dmesg' and 'logcat' are, they will get absolutely no support from me and are on their own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You guys have to understand from his point of view. Do u know how many questions or post saying things need to get fixed would pop up the whole reason around building your own from source is that if you can do that you should be able to put out questions and answer that help instead of simple or complex things that have being covered if you have the basic understanding and you can actually help with issues address them correctly ina Manet that helps fix it than its easier to get things sorted out before a release. So he doesn't want them in the original thread. I would suggest if you can find someone to share it since you have the approval now have them pm you not share it over the thread or any other thread and don't share it your self so it doesn't cause the other thread or any other to get cramped with questions that can or can't be answered. So if you get it keep it to yourself to help with that factor
Sent from my SGH-I997 using XDA App

ok, so given that it is better not to post links to home-brew builds on these forums, I figured to put mine here:
http://tools.1url.ws/cm7infuse.php
for who's craving to run CM7 on their infuse, and doesn't have the time/setup/etc. to build it on his own.
All the warnings, disclaimers, etc. stand of course. No support provided, no guarantee I'll build more in the future. As time allows every few days I plan to grab the latest sources and do a new build to post it there.
At this time I'm using the 10/12/2011 build, and aside from the known issues, works pretty well for me. But then again, you might end up having a totally different experience.
- Adriano

Anyone Dev in 3.0 kernel

Hi.. any dev
Our cm9 is under progress because the 3.0 kernel is hold .dhiru can finish a fully working cm9 with a 3.0 kernel.
So we( users of i9003)hope any Dev can help us in the kernel development...can put time in..
It is our last hope in i9003
loukalok
Sent from my Last hope GT-I9003 using xda premium

quick question, if kernel 3 is released, then ALL the known bugs will be fixed??

marshygeek said:
quick question, if kernel 3 is released, then ALL the known bugs will be fixed??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes according to dhiru

marshygeek said:
quick question, if kernel 3 is released, then ALL the known bugs will be fixed??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be, it can easy to fix USB.....
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

@all
we have the source code for K3, but 1st make it to boot on our devices, than debug for the new Kernel bugs, than continue to port CM9.
so, not like we have kernel 3, than we have CM9 stright away.

chongns said:
@all
we have the source code for K3, but 1st make it to boot on our devices, than debug for the new Kernel bugs, than continue to port CM9.
so, not like we have kernel 3, than we have CM9 stright away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now are waiting to debug
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

loukalok said:
Now are waiting to debug
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean we have kernel 3 booting ?

chongns said:
you mean we have kernel 3 booting ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.....
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

loukalok said:
No.....
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be happy to help port kernel 3.x to this device. Your best bet is to go for kernel 3.4 as it's newer and will have more security and performance boosts, and it will also have updates to the OMAP architecture.
The only thing holding me back from helping you guys is the lack of a device. I have heard a few people want to organise one (some guy named Fuss is getting rid of his?), I'd be happy to pay for shipping the device to New Zealand.
This is OMAP so anything is possible for this phone.

hillbeast said:
I would be happy to help port kernel 3.x to this device. Your best bet is to go for kernel 3.4 as it's newer and will have more security and performance boosts, and it will also have updates to the OMAP architecture.
The only thing holding me back from helping you guys is the lack of a device. I have heard a few people want to organise one (some guy named Fuss is getting rid of his?), I'd be happy to pay for shipping the device to New Zealand.
This is OMAP so anything is possible for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26295293&postcount=11. He was developing for our phone after we donated a device to him, but in the end could not do much for us, maybe he had some real life problems or something, but now he is willing to give it away. Are you sure you are willing to pay the shipping costs? It would be great, but i think we should hear from dhiru first. He is porting CM9 to our device currently, and is doing an awesome job so far, just needs the kernel 3.x Here is the CM9 thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1449649

hillbeast said:
I would be happy to help port kernel 3.x to this device. Your best bet is to go for kernel 3.4 as it's newer and will have more security and performance boosts, and it will also have updates to the OMAP architecture.
The only thing holding me back from helping you guys is the lack of a device. I have heard a few people want to organise one (some guy named Fuss is getting rid of his?), I'd be happy to pay for shipping the device to New Zealand.
This is OMAP so anything is possible for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope u'll take the phone man, and good work with 3.0 kernel! =)

bscraze said:
Well here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26295293&postcount=11. He was developing for our phone after we donated a device to him, but in the end could not do much for us, maybe he had some real life problems or something, but now he is willing to give it away. Are you sure you are willing to pay the shipping costs? It would be great, but i think we should hear from dhiru first. He is porting CM9 to our device currently, and is doing an awesome job so far, just needs the kernel 3.x Here is the CM9 thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1449649
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I shall give fuss a buzz and let him know I'd be willing to take the device off his hands.

so what about this kernel?are u developing it?

Mamica said:
so what about this kernel?are u developing it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. Aren't you a persistent one... Ive seen your spams in 3 different threads already. And you've been replied to by three different guys. Now you've bumped a 16 day old thread...
So Mamica, since we're in the general section, can you enlighten us with your reason for asking the ETA and the developer of Kernel 3.0 over and over and over again? What's the reason for this urgency?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium

there isn't any urgency and the people i asked didn't answer me at all
---------- Post added at 05:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM ----------
i just want to know if the project started

@Mamika, you don't have to ask this in every thread u see. If people don't answer u is because it is answered. It is very simple to read threads and get ur own answers to everything. People is tired of other who want the easy way. They ask and want people to solve their doubts and questions...
Kernel 3.0 port hasn't started. Hillbeast is going to compile it and dhiru will use it to solve bugs like HW acceleration in video. Hillbeast needs a device. Fuss has sent his device to hillbeast a week ago and it is going by ship so we don't know when will it arrive. No one knows that so please stop asking, be pacient and do not spam the threads. Hope u understand..

This is what I wanted, a simple answer.It took a long to give one.....Thanks for your desire to write

Mamica said:
This is what I wanted, a simple answer.It took a long to give one.....Thanks for your desire to write
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this simple answer u can get by easy search also...! Dont expect that everyone will answer ur every question.

vishal24387 said:
this simple answer u can get by easy search also...! Dont expect that everyone will answer ur every question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vishal, smoke is coming out from your nose
@Mamica: Although i do not own this device anymore, i was well aware of what is happening on developing the 3.0 kernel for sgsl by reading through the forum. About fuss, hillbeast, how the sgsl community helped each other in order to send to hillbeast the device etc. A simple search(yeah, annoying to write and specially annoying to read ) or scroll through this forum may have answered your question. Anyway, this is not intended to bash you in anyway but just a reminder that a simple search (

ephraim033 said:
Vishal, smoke is coming out from your nose
@Mamica: Although i do not own this device anymore, i was well aware of what is happening on developing the 3.0 kernel for sgsl by reading through the forum. About fuss, hillbeast, how the sgsl community helped each other in order to send to hillbeast the device etc. A simple search(yeah, annoying to write and specially annoying to read ) or scroll through this forum may have answered your question. Anyway, this is not intended to bash you in anyway but just a reminder that a simple search (
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha ha...no buddy. I am not at all angry. I have spend nearly 1.5 yrs on xda. So now I am used to behaviour of new members. I just want that they should learn to search & get info instead of keep on posting or pm same questions again & again

JellyBean kernels in development for NS?

I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app

MercilessLTD said:
I'm fairly new to XDA, so I don't mean to tread on anyone's toes by asking.
Anyone currently developing a JellyBean kernel for Nexus S (or 4G)?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course there is. Every Dev who has created a ICS will make a JB. Not sure this is worthy of a thread start. Next week things will start rolling in Kernels and Rom's. Just enjoy JB.

Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?

063_XOBX said:
Nothing is coming until we have source. This thread only asks a question that even a little bit of logic would make unnecessary. I don't get why anyone would feel the need to ask it, I mean what's their reasoning? Is every kernel dev is sitting on their hands until someone asks if anyone's working on something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source seems to be there : https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/samsung
branche : android-samsung-3.0-jb

_thalamus said:
So, I tried to build a JB kernel, but it won't boot. It appears that Google have not pushed the correct kernel source for the JB OTA...
The PVR userspace libs and kernel driver is mismatched.
So, I've requested the correct source on the Android Building groups, and will release a test version whenever they decide to push that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333

jokkir said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29051464&postcount=333
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read thalamus thread, thats been fixed...
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app

Air kernel weekly version for JB released
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app

[Q] Source Code Repo?

Hi Guys,
I tried to post in Developer forum, but it says I cannot ask questions there. Hopefully, developers read these Q&A threads.
I am a software developer and have created a few Android apps. I'm familiar with the Android platform and programming in general.
I've done a ton a research on ROM development and believe I will be able to contribute.
Unfortunately, my Google-fu seems to be failing me because I am missing the most important part.
I cannot find where you guys are getting the source for the OTA updates?
I mean, I found the source for bare Android and could use that... but I want to start with the OTA source.
For example, I am looking for the source for OTA 4.1.2 VRBMB1 that has all the TouchWiz stuff.
Thanks a ton if you can point me in the correct direction.

Online search "Samsung source code," then click Samsung's website, search for "SCH-I535," and that's all I got.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

SlimSnoopOS said:
Online search "Samsung source code," then click Samsung's website, search for "SCH-I535," and that's all I got.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That appears to be what I need. Thanks a ton!