[Q] Does Skype v2.1 Video work on the G2x? - T-Mobile LG G2x

I saw Skype updated to 2.1 today. My G2x is getting repaired so I can't try it, but has anyone been able to confirm if video works on this version?

No, It doesn't work. They have made it work with the Sensation and other phones release way after our G2X and the G2X is still not supported. What the hell? I am pissed as hell, I want to use it tooo...

That's really annoying. Skype is really the only reason I care about having a front-facing camera.

I know, Right?! Me too!

Pecata said:
No, It doesn't work. They have made it work with the Sensation and other phones release way after our G2X and the G2X is still not supported. What the hell? I am pissed as hell, I want to use it tooo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read several articles that says it has unofficial support for other devices, but I'm not seeing that option.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2x using XDA Premium App

C0dy said:
I've read several articles that says it has unofficial support for other devices, but I'm not seeing that option.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried all the unofficial builds and none of them work with the G2X. Can someone make it work please! I really need video call on my phone....

Would editing the build.prop help? How else would Skype know?

SaHiLzZ said:
Would editing the build.prop help? How else would Skype know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No idea, I hope someone can make it work on our phones as well. It seems only the Tegra 2 phones aren't working with it...don't know why

Pecata said:
No, It doesn't work. They have made it work with the Sensation and other phones release way after our G2X and the G2X is still not supported. What the hell? I am pissed as hell, I want to use it tooo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's making me extremely mad. What video chat for phone-to-desktop actually works with this thing??? And now that Skype claims this will work on all 2.2+ devices, why is it not working on my 2.3.5 gb g2x?? Is it because the Tegra 2 doesn't have Neon support? Well neither does the Sensation's snapdragon... and that's officially supported. Come on, skype...

nucleartoasteroven said:
It's making me extremely mad. What video chat for phone-to-desktop actually works with this thing??? And now that Skype claims this will work on all 2.2+ devices, why is it not working on my 2.3.5 gb g2x?? Is it because the Tegra 2 doesn't have Neon support? Well neither does the Sensation's hummingbird... and that's officially supported. Come on, skype...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using oovoo currently since there is nothing else that works for video chat from phone to desktop.
I am so mad at skype as well. I don't know what the big deal is.

Pecata said:
I am using oovoo currently since there is nothing else that works for video chat from phone to desktop.
I am so mad at skype as well. I don't know what the big deal is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried Oovoo a short while ago, and had trouble with sideways video or sometimes no video at all. Guess I'll be trying again. And Skype should at the very least quit advertising that this works on practically all froyo+ devices... They need G2x support, and they need it soon. Taking their time has already earned them the low rating they have (or had before this release, fixing for many people) in the market.

nucleartoasteroven said:
It's making me extremely mad. What video chat for phone-to-desktop actually works with this thing??? And now that Skype claims this will work on all 2.2+ devices, why is it not working on my 2.3.5 gb g2x?? Is it because the Tegra 2 doesn't have Neon support? Well neither does the Sensation's hummingbird... and that's officially supported. Come on, skype...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sensation's hummingbird does actually have Neon. Google sensation, hummingbird, neon, and you should see it. I always worry about posting links to outside of the forum, but it's easy to see.
They do claim it'll only work on 2.2+ devices with neon capabilities... I'm no electrical engineer or dev so I have no idea why both gtalk video and skype need it but they do.
Sadly it means it's not as easy as a build.prop fix. One day... or I'll just get a phone with tegra 3 when that comes along which has neon support haha.

Danishswag said:
The sensation's hummingbird does actually have Neon. Google sensation, hummingbird, neon, and you should see it. I always worry about posting links to outside of the forum, but it's easy to see.
They do claim it'll only work on 2.2+ devices with neon capabilities... I'm no electrical engineer or dev so I have no idea why both gtalk video and skype need it but they do.
Sadly it means it's not as easy as a build.prop fix. One day... or I'll just get a phone with tegra 3 when that comes along which has neon support haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, interesting. I remember reading somewhere on XDA that "Our friends over at the Sensation board are out of luck as well as the Snapdragon doesn't have NEON either."
Oops, sorry, I meant Snapdragon. Haha XD
I wonder if that guy is still right, though. If he is wrong, that explains why Sensation is officially supported while non-NEON t2 is not. But... If he's right, there is no reason why Skype doesn't support t2 and in that case a build.prop change or decompile and removal of the apk's device checks would work.
Got some looking up to do...

Danishswag said:
I'm no electrical engineer or dev so I have no idea why both gtalk video and skype need it but they do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This may not be correct either, but I think it might be for hardware acceleration/an easier video processing library. I gotta look into that too.

nucleartoasteroven said:
It's making me extremely mad. What video chat for phone-to-desktop actually works with this thing??? And now that Skype claims this will work on all 2.2+ devices, why is it not working on my 2.3.5 gb g2x?? Is it because the Tegra 2 doesn't have Neon support? Well neither does the Sensation's hummingbird... and that's officially supported. Come on, skype...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Sensation has a Qualcomm Snapdragon Processor, not a Hummingbird.

FatalityBoyZahy said:
The Sensation has a Qualcomm Snapdragon Processor, not a Hummingbird.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, I corrected myself in my response to Danishswag when I went to look up the quote. Thanks! Now to confirm that Snapdragon doesn't have NEON...?

nucleartoasteroven said:
Yep, I corrected myself in my response to Danishswag when I went to look up the quote. Thanks! Now to confirm that Snapdragon doesn't have NEON...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure Snapdragon doesn't have NEON. Qualcomm licensed the ARMv7 ISA only and not the Cortex-A8 or A9 designs(The Cortex-A8 introduced the NEON core FPU but you seem to know this). The ARMv7 ISA only mandates Thumb and such.
nucleartoasteroven said:
This may not be correct either, but I think it might be for hardware acceleration/an easier video processing library. I gotta look into that too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From personal experience of doing video encode from an Android device;FFmpeg, the open source library for video encode/decode is preferred on Android and is very optimized for NEON(TI is one of the main contributors for FFmpeg for ARM and all TI OMAP3 and OMAP4 designs have NEON). I'm guessing the video APIs for Android use FFmpeg so Gtalk and Skype would be reliant on these libraries.
However the Atrix got Gtalk so there probably is some workaround for this...
Back On Topic: I hear vtok(Gtalk) works

bakedpatato said:
I'm pretty sure Snapdragon doesn't have NEON. Qualcomm licensed the ARMv7 ISA only and not the Cortex-A8 or A9 designs(The Cortex-A8 introduced the NEON core FPU but you seem to know this). The ARMv7 ISA only mandates Thumb and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, OK, thanks for the clarification. So Skype has adapted an official certified version for non-NEON processors, meaning there shouldn't be much reason why they still aren't supporting Tegra 2.
bakedpatato said:
From personal experience of doing video encode from an Android device;FFmpeg, the open source library for video encode/decode is preferred on Android and is very optimized for NEON(TI is one of the main contributors for FFmpeg for ARM and all TI OMAP3 and OMAP4 designs have NEON). I'm guessing the video APIs for Android use FFmpeg so Gtalk and Skype would be reliant on these libraries.
However the Atrix got Gtalk so there probably is some workaround for this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is correct, both apps rely on NEON and that's why previous ports failed. Atrix (T2) did get gtalk, so there is a new attempt underway. Have a look at http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1184999
There hasn't been too much progress (at least publicly displayed) or as much as the LG cam port attempt, but it's promising. And now that a version of Skype is availible for a non-neon processor, I'm guessing our wonderful devs will soon attempt to use the new libraries to make a working port. Let's hope for the best
bakedpatato said:
Back On Topic: I hear vtok(Gtalk) works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried this, without much luck... I haven't gotten it to make a video call without force closing yet.
For the record, anyone, I'm running my G2x with CM7 nightly 94. I will be updating to 97 tomorrow; maybe, just maybe, that will change the results with programs I'm describing here, such as oovoo and vtok not working. If it does, I will repost.

nucleartoasteroven said:
Ahh, OK, thanks for the clarification. So Skype has adapted an official certified version for non-NEON processors, meaning there shouldn't be much reason why they still aren't supporting Tegra 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't have source so we don't know how they did it...
nucleartoasteroven said:
That is correct, both apps rely on NEON and that's why previous ports failed. Atrix (T2) did get gtalk, so there is a new attempt underway. Have a look at http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1184999
There hasn't been too much progress (at least publicly displayed) or as much as the LG cam port attempt, but it's promising. And now that a version of Skype is availible for a non-neon processor, I'm guessing our wonderful devs will soon attempt to use the new libraries to make a working port. Let's hope for the best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I would rather see working gchat than LG cam but I'm happy to help out anywhere.
nucleartoasteroven said:
I tried this, without much luck... I haven't gotten it to make a video call without force closing yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fuuuuuu....
nucleartoasteroven said:
For the record, anyone, I'm running my G2x with CM7 nightly 94. I will be updating to 97 tomorrow; maybe, just maybe, that will change the results with programs I'm describing here, such as oovoo and vtok not working. If it does, I will repost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 97 has some FFC/cam fixes(looked at changelog) so it might.

That's some BS. The G2X has been out 2 months longer then the Sensation! -__-
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

Related

Snapdragon HDMI?

I'm starting this thread cause I'm curious what you have to say on this.
Qualcomm is talking much(especially lately) about their snapdragon platform and how great it will be, that it will play 720p videos with support for multiply codecs and that it will be 3D graphic 'monster', but lately I think that it lacks one very important function HDMI. I know that there isn't even one phone which has it(but more and more phones have TV-out and with the flood of HD TV's it's a must) but either there is one that is capable of playbacking 720p content and for now only tegra has HDMI which is something that puts a smile on my face. With it it can become ultimate PMP.
Do you think qualcomm should add HD out to snapdragon or leave it these way and wait for newer processor from snapdragon family?
Please answer maybe they will read it and they will add it
sorry...i dont know what to answer....
SYNIVA INVESTMENT CO.
720-897-7619
www.synviaweb.com
synviaweb.com said:
sorry...i dont know what to answer....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then maybe you shouldn't have bothered posting.
I think they should wait on it for a newer processor.

Apad M70003 MIDI

Hi all. Just finished ordering this tablet that is currently running cupcake. Would love to root it and install a custom ROM. Any info on how I can achieve this?
Thanks in advance
offtopic... does the apad run any good? is it smooth?
Why is it off topic. It is a tablet that runs android. Do not have it yet so can't comment on how good or bad it runs.
i was asking an off topic question (i.e. not related to your question). guess i phrased my sentence wrongly. do post here on how well this device seems to perform.
I will. Thanks for your intrest.
You should of waited for the Notion's ADAM
I only paid $100.00 US for my tablet. This one is considerably more.
manfly9884 said:
I only paid $100.00 US for my tablet. This one is considerably more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey could you pm me the site where you purchased it from?
could you update your main post with the specs that you ordered from? Apparently there are Apad clones with crappy processors instead of the rockchip processors
Dealextreme has it for cheap
dealextreme is the crap version. the proper apad is the one with rockchip in it. and i found out that the cheapest apad with rockchip is ~150usd
i have one of those too.
with the rockchip which actually is not to bad of a processor. nowhere near the A4 but ok to work with.
it's an ARM derivative and consists of a cpu and dsp(gpu).
i would also like to know if anybody has played with it yet.
i followed the android instructions of building a development envirnment and have the tablet actually show up in eclipse but where to go from here?
sorry for threadjacking a bit
i would first of all like to be able to upgrade android. if possible 2.2 or at least to 1.6.
the device has the upgrade locked.
the are also language option conflicts were suggestive text and some keyboard keys still show up in (i guess) Chinese.
It'll most likely be impossible to upgrade the apad to 2.1/2.2 as rockchip dsp isn't actually a gpu, its a video processor for videos only.
on another note i have decided to pass up on the apad as it doesn't seem that "future-proof" most likely will get this http://www.wiipad.us/product.php?id_product=11 unless better options come out in the next 1 month or so
does android 2.x require a specialized dedicated gpu?
the dsp is essentially a gpu, it is capable of playing 720p video.
it should be plenty for android 2.x to get around
so i can move files from the device to the pc.
i copied the data and system folder.
what to do now?
info5i2002 said:
It'll most likely be impossible to upgrade the apad to 2.1/2.2 as rockchip dsp isn't actually a gpu, its a video processor for videos only.
on another note i have decided to pass up on the apad as it doesn't seem that "future-proof" most likely will get this http://www.wiipad.us/product.php?id_product=11 unless better options come out in the next 1 month or so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The wiipad seems to be a very nice tablet. But till they receive a proper review, for the money, I'll stick to my Apad.
manfly9884 said:
The wiipad seems to be a very nice tablet. But till they receive a proper review, for the money, I'll stick to my Apad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i like the look of the notion ink adam, i mean dual core processor
[email protected] said:
does android 2.x require a specialized dedicated gpu?
the dsp is essentially a gpu, it is capable of playing 720p video.
it should be plenty for android 2.x to get around
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but it decodes videos only, a gpu actually pumps out the graphics which is an intergral part of 2.1 onwards (also in the rockchip's specs i saw somewhere this chip does not support 2.1) The wiipad neno has a cortex a8 core which is similar to the ipad's processor so it is running on 2.1.
slaming said:
i like the look of the notion ink adam, i mean dual core processor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah notion ink is awesome but it's been delayed so long that it is not worth much with the impending competition. (unless they make it unbelievably cheaper)
ok i see
any hope for 1.6 at least? maybe 2.0?
yeah notion ink is awesome but it's been delayed so long that it is not worth much with the impending competition. (unless they make it unbelievably cheaper)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I just read on engadget its still expected in q3 and that's about the time I'm gonna be looking to buy one it could be perfect.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
ive been digging around at Apads for weeks.. and i havent really found one i was impressed with.. i thought about going with just something to play with a lil bit and get the EKEN m001 or w.e modle it is.. but i just couldnt get it at a price id be willing to shell out and be ok with.. but this wiipad.. with android 2.1 deff has my attention especially wit a 1ghz processor.. and with it having a 16gig nand flash at a price of 267.19 i will shell out the money.. cuz thats exactly what i want.. but i to will wait for more reviews on the product.. but please post what you think about the one you orderd OP cuz i am intrested in that one as well.. and can you PM me the site you got it from for 100$?? please and thank you.. and im very happy to see these Apads (android tablets) showing up in the forum!! i cant wait for a few devs to jump on board imagine the roms and custom stuff i feel like a kid ina candy store already

Flash 10.2 Leak

Has anyone had any luck getting the leaked 10.2 Flash player on Hero CDMA? If so, could you share what you did to get it working and what setup you have? If you followed a specific forum post, could you link it? I have searched but none of the forum posts here I've tried have worked.
I've tried changing the user agent in the browser, however, I could not find 'Desktop' as some of the other posts have suggested. At this point, I've tried installing the leaked version directly: no joy.
I'm running CM7 RC2 with no mods at the moment.
Here is the link I used for the leaked Flash 10.2:
http://www.crunchitech.com/2011/03/15/download-flash-player-leak-version-10-2-for-android-2-22-33-0/
its not going to work, never will the reason why has been answered on here atleast 100000000000000000000 times, good find but wasted in here
ARMv6 vs. ARMv7 = Adobe refuses to set compiler flags.
thoughtlesskyle said:
its not going to work, never will the reason why has been answered on here atleast 100000000000000000000 times, good find but wasted in here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I should have been less specific in my use of the search tool. You are right. Hero is ARMv6 and Flash is compiled for ARMv7. Oh well, thanks for at least replying to me.
Now it would be nice if there was a module you could load into memory that would do machine code translation from v7 to v6... at least make it runable/compatible or make v7 programs 'think' they are running on v7. I'm sure that what be a nightmare of processor faults. And if it did run, it probably wouldn't be fast at all. Perhaps a v7 virtual machine? Again, another pipe dream because the Hero has less memory than a 486.
It's Adobe's fault anyway. A v6 plugin would not be hard to compile from the source. Just set the compiler flags and go. Grrr.
Thanks again.
Your right it probably wouldn't be hard but I think they did it this way because on the hardware acceleration side phones with v7 usually have the resources to spare to make flash run smoothly even flash lite is clunky at times on our v6 phones
They will chalk it up to delivering a consistent experience on their supported devices
zansatsu said:
I should have been less specific in my use of the search tool. You are right. Hero is ARMv6 and Flash is compiled for ARMv7. Oh well, thanks for at least replying to me.
Now it would be nice if there was a module you could load into memory that would do machine code translation from v7 to v6... at least make it runable/compatible or make v7 programs 'think' they are running on v7. I'm sure that what be a nightmare of processor faults. And if it did run, it probably wouldn't be fast at all. Perhaps a v7 virtual machine? Again, another pipe dream because the Hero has less memory than a 486.
It's Adobe's fault anyway. A v6 plugin would not be hard to compile from the source. Just set the compiler flags and go. Grrr.
Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Unfortunately, the ARMv7 logic doesn't hold much truth as I was not able to run flash on my Samsung moment. I think there may be more factors involved.
aqualls said:
Unfortunately, the ARMv7 logic doesn't hold much truth as I was not able to run flash on my Samsung moment. I think there may be more factors involved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought samsung used something other than ARM whatever it is I don't think they are using arm v7 I think the processor is close to what apple uses in the iphone 4 the cortex but I am not sure.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
aqualls said:
Unfortunately, the ARMv7 logic doesn't hold much truth as I was not able to run flash on my Samsung moment. I think there may be more factors involved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
samsung moment is ARM11 which is ARMv6... not v7
I learned this one the hard way...
At first glance, ARM chip designations can be confusing but the difference is the ARM Family version vs. ARM Architecture version:
Note that architecture version names contain a 'v' and the family version names do not:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_processor#ARM_cores
The Hero and Moment are ARMv6 architecture whereas newer phones are ARMv7.
It sucks, d00d! You are SOL just like me and many other Hero owners.
EDIT: Technically: The one notable exception to the 'v' observation is the ARMv5TE: Bulverde. But, heh, it works for me.
bk718 said:
samsung moment is ARM11 which is ARMv6... not v7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not according to the the specs and every hardware app on the market. Trust me. If it was I could have run flash and apps for .avi video without audio sync issues.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA Premium App
aqualls said:
Not according to the the specs and every hardware app on the market. Trust me. If it was I could have run flash and apps for .avi video without audio sync issues.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what specs are u looking at??
Click here and scroll over to samsung moment.. ARM1176 which is ARMv6
refer to the link that zansatsu posted... its in there as well
or this link
or where its discussed here
i could go on and on or u can google it if you like and see for yourself..
im not trying to downplay you, but just trying to inform you that the information that you've been given is incorrect regarding the samsung moment having an ARMv7 chip..
The Samsung SPH-M900 (Moment) processor is an ARM11 Family, ARMv6 Architecture CPU:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM11#ARM11-based_products
zansatsu said:
The Samsung SPH-M900 (Moment) processor is an ARM11 Family, ARMv6 Architecture CPU:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM11#ARM11-based_products
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think with my links and ur links are point should be driven by now..

[Q] google talk video g2x

I installed CM7 and flashed GApps dated May 3rd,2011 and video is supposed to work but when I try to initiate a video chat I see a black screen for a second but then it goes away and it says calling... for a little while but then goes away.
When I try to initiate a video chat on my PC to my GTalk account on my phone, it says that I don't have video chat capabilities.
Is this just completely broken for the G2X ?
For some reason google made it so video chat only works on single core processors (cortex a8) for now
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
aim1126 said:
For some reason google made it so video chat only works on single core processors (cortex a8) for now
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
I've been researching this problem and it basically comes down to this. The GApps build dated May 3, 2011 isn't compiled as a universal app. It's only compiled for certain types of processors (neon board and ARM v7) while phones that have ARM v6 and Tegra (like the G2x) are out of the loop for now. When an official update for G2x comes out that updates to 2.3.4 then that will be another story. It will be possible to flash GApps for 2.3.4 that will support video chat.
goo-inside.me/gapps
This site explains everything (scroll down to the bottom).
aparanoidandroid said:
Thanks
I've been researching this problem and it basically comes down to this. The GApps build dated May 3, 2011 isn't compiled as a universal app. It's only compiled for certain types of processors (neon board and ARM v7) while phones that have ARM v6 and Tegra (like the G2x) are out of the loop for now. When an official update for G2x comes out that updates to 2.3.4 then that will be another story. It will be possible to flash GApps for 2.3.4 that will support video chat.
goo-inside.me/gapps
This site explains everything (scroll down to the bottom).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... Anybody have any ideas or guesses as to if the GTalk app from honeycomb would work?
Just curious since all the tablets that ship with honeycomb seem to utilize the Tegra 2
That is stupid!!!!!!!!!!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

tegra 2 harmony video excelerated kernel

I was just wondering, the viewsonic gtablet is a tegra 2 harmony device and the guys at team drh have made a kernel for ics that is fully hardware excelerated so my question is since the g2x is a harmony device can the drh kernel be used as a base for a working g2x kernel with full video decoding just like the gtablet???
Harmony is for tablets. We have Ventana.
Closest best is the ZTE Mimosa X which has ICS and the Ventana. When it drops hopefully we can grab the drivers from there.
From the 2x side:
msedek said:
If porting full working drivers were possible in any way from any device to make o2x runs with everything working on ics it should be done by now.. Al the things you are thinking now developers though about it long time ago... I'm developer myself.. Just not android developer.. I develop in assembler for microcontrollers as I am electronics engineer, and trust me there's nothing that I don't know about the chips I work on...
Every microcontroler (I'm specialist in microchip) has different libraries to access the different modules... As microchip produce open source libraries I can access all the functionalities in the processor and microchip provide the full pdf with the instructions set for every processor.. But even chips from the same family with a minimum variation like let's say pic18f478 to pic18f478a can have bunch of different modules with a bunch of different libraries...
So once I can develop a function out of the instructions set (what's called here from scratch) I can then develop a library wich I can call in my main software every time I want the processor execute an action... So in this case Nvidia won't provide their instructions set for their processors... They only provide libraries to oems... And oems can develop procedures and functions with these libraries...
That said Nvidia has no responsibilities here... Because no matter what os oems use the chips and the libraries are the same and the method to access chipset function won't change from one os to another... That's processor architecture and can not be modified..
LG has to re develop the function and procedures to work with the new os that is low level (assembler compiled) and embedded into the os... Those functions are way different from one device to another and it's not possible to use them unless it's the same exact chip family with no variants...
Devs here can not develop functions because they don't have access to the libraries... They only have access to the final product or what I could call the UI for developer.. And that's the DRIVERS..
That's it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
redmonke255 said:
Harmony is for tablets. We have Ventana.
Closest best is the ZTE Mimosa X which has ICS and the Ventana. When it drops hopefully we can grab the drivers from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean this???
tonyp said:
Here is a high-speed mirror of the ROM: http://d-h.st/DDn
RC hasn't replied to me, yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
redmonke255 said:
Harmony is for tablets. We have Ventana.
Closest best is the ZTE Mimosa X which has ICS and the Ventana. When it drops hopefully we can grab the drivers from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure about that everything i read said g2x was a harmony board and its not as simple as one is phone one is tablet the Motorola xoom is a ventana board i do believe its more to do with components like memory and amount of memory sound chips and how they are implemented together
Everything you've read is wrong then.
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tegra#section_2
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
redmonke255 said:
Everything you've read is wrong then.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why are the xoom and transformer tf101 referred to as ventana devices on this site in their own forums???
Big_Doodie said:
So why are the xoom and transformer tf101 referred to as ventana devices on this site in their own forums???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the people saying it are misinformed. Ventana is the phone version, harmony is the tablet version.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Is this of any use?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29622231&postcount=378
lehjr said:
Is this of any use?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=29622231&postcount=378
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Can this really be it? Somebody confirm so I can save some $ for donations!
Please be useful... I'm praying right now.
Fingers crossed
Wouldn't that be wonderful!
gpmartinson said:
Wouldn't that be wonderful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might make me keep my G2x a lil' bit longer
Recently released Tegra 2 drivers are for Linux (Ubuntu), and they're binary so they're virtually impossible to hack for Android without superhuman effort and skills and unlimited time.
Read from XDA post:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26960631&postcount=1
and read the information at the Wikipedia site about Open Source and NVIDIA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_hardware_and_FOSS
and read the statement from NVIDIA
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/0...ra-devices-as-long-as-their-manufacturers-do/
and read this statement by Ricardo Cerqueira:
https://plus.google.com/11504942893...jeUiS#115049428938715274412/posts/KycR8ZjeUiS
and read the Tegra Linux Driver Package release notes:
http://developer.download.nvidia.co...ux_Driver_Package_Release_Notes_R15_armhf.pdf
Core Memory said:
Recently released Tegra 2 drivers are for Linux (Ubuntu), and they're binary so they're virtually impossible to hack for Android without superhuman effort and skills and unlimited time.
Read from XDA post:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26960631&postcount=1
and read the information at the Wikipedia site about Open Source and NVIDIA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_hardware_and_FOSS
and read the statement from NVIDIA
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/0...ra-devices-as-long-as-their-manufacturers-do/
and read this statement by Ricardo Cerqueira:
https://plus.google.com/11504942893...jeUiS#115049428938715274412/posts/KycR8ZjeUiS
and read the Tegra Linux Driver Package release notes:
http://developer.download.nvidia.co...ux_Driver_Package_Release_Notes_R15_armhf.pdf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boooooo, I'm sad... again
Naive but
Not sure I get the problem...isn't android really a linux clone with less stuff? Wish I knew more about how this works.

Categories

Resources