[Q] 4000+ Quadrant Scores - Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

How are you guys hitting the 4000+ mark in quadrant standard? I'm getting close (in the 3800 range) but I can't get over 4000. I'm running Prime 1.6 ROM with the I/O patch, and clemsyn #18 kernel @ 1.6ghz (both just fresh installed).
This is the highest I've been able to get:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I tried the latest version of Netformer kernel, but I'm only getting around 2800 with it, so I went back to clemsyn.
Any suggestions on what I can do to go over the 4000 mark?

Xxq TZ pxX said:
How are you guys hitting the 4000+ mark in quadrant standard? I'm getting close (in the 3800 range) but I can't get over 4000. I'm running Prime 1.6 ROM with the I/O patch, and clemsyn #18 kernel @ 1.6ghz (both just fresh installed).
This is the highest I've been able to get:
I tried the latest version of Netformer kernel, but I'm only getting around 2800 with it, so I went back to clemsyn.
Any suggestions on what I can do to go over the 4000 mark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldnt really worry about it since those scores have nothing to do with real life performance. The Droid X has gotten 4000 with CyanogenMod 7 and has nowhere close to the power of our TFs

Related

Quadrant score van 1100 => 1450

Found a nice tutorial which explains how to compile a new kernel with 3 patches starting from the bravo stock sources.
http://arighi.blogspot.com/2011/01/howto-install-custom-kernel-on-htc.html
One of the patches is the BFS scheduler.
I compiled the kernel with -O3 optimization and left out some things (e.g. PPP, IPv6).
Procedure went flawless (but of course requires certain level of linux skill).
After running Quadrant with this new kernel my score went up from 1100 to 1437 (with setrCPU to keep the 1GHz frequency on).
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Note that I am using the stock Sense ROM (OTA upgraded to the HTC Froyo update). The compiled kernel can be installed using Clockworkmod recovery.
the thread title is in dutch
godutch said:
the thread title is in dutch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I posted first on the Dutch forum. Then copy-pasted the title (oops). I can't seem to change it though ;-)
looks nice, knida unsueful tho
Why don't you upload your kernel so us others can try it?
Sent from my HTC Desire

Compare quadrant scores

Lets compare our quadrant scores to figure out which Rom is fastest.
I got a score of 1831. Im using Voidu with Uniy Kernel at 1.2 ghz.
mrmojorisin' said:
Lets compare our quadrant scores to figure out which Rom is fastest.
I got a score of 1831. Im using Voidu with Uniy Kernel at 1.2 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about posting scores running at stock CPU speed 1024Mhz (or as near to stock speed as your kernel permits) as some ROMS only run stock kernel and therefore can't OC
Quadrant score of 2035 running 2.10.401.4 with stock kernel, as per screenshot
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sorry, wrong screenshot attached. Anyway, make that 2117
No o/c-ing, stock.
Sent from my wArty friend
2400.
Achieved on my personal rom, based on the ota leak, unity 9 kernel, 1075mhz.
this thread already exist in this forum
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1267189&highlight=quadrant+score

The Quadrant Standard Thread

This is my quadrant score with Endymion and full overclock to 1459MHz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So what's your score?
2089 - 1.0Ghz
2954 - 1.5Ghz
Also theres already two or three of these threads, you should have bumped them.
Also it allows to compare the newer builds/ROMs to older builds/ROMs.
Also just because the ROM I'm running scored higher than yours, doesn't mean which ever ROM I am running is better, there are more factors than a pointless basic "benchmarking" application can speculate.
zeekiz said:
2089 - 1.0Ghz
2954 - 1.5Ghz
Also theres already two or three of these threads, you should have bumped them.
Also it allows to compare the newer builds/ROMs to older builds/ROMs.
Also just because the ROM I'm running scored higher than yours, doesn't mean which ever ROM I am running is better, there are more factors than a pointless basic "benchmarking" application can speculate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM you on mate?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
THIS THREAD ALREADY EXISTS! PLEASE USE THE SEARCH OPTION BEFORE STARTING A NEW THREAD
Thankyou
Please look here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1267189

[Q] CPU 100% problem

Hi folks ... I'm havig a problem with the cpu running at 100% alot of the time ... i cnt seem to figure out whats causing it
I was running Prime OC kernel and setcpu running it at 1200 ... thought it might be Setcpu, so uninstalled that ... rebooted and CPU spy shows it still using cpu at full. Installed blades kernel and it shot up to 1504 full CPU usage (even though i flashed the 1.2 default)
Flashed the stock kernel and its now sitting at 100% 1000 !!!!
Unless cpu spy is showing me false results i dont know what i've changed or installed for it to suddenly start doing this .... Head scratching moment ...
Advice welcome
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
P.S. screenie is when i was on prime OC kernel
Have you tired re-flashing your kernal and rom?
Tried 3 kernels ....
I think its due to cpu spy though thankfully... running a cpu load widget now and its results are alot more pleasing to the eye
Cpu spy must have been updated recently i suppose and for some reason its knockedthe results askew.

Undervolting - Am I doing it right?

I was looking at the glitch kernel thread and saw that the max UV for the kernel was -200 for 200mhz, and around -50 for 1Ghz.
Well I'm managing almost -200 for all of the speeds and I haven't faced any issues so far. What's going on? Is my phone not actually undervolted?
Here's a screenshot...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(sorry for the horrible image quality).
Silencer96 said:
I was looking at the glitch kernel thread and saw that the max UV for the kernel was -200 for 200mhz, and around -50 for 1Ghz.
Well I'm managing almost -200 for all of the speeds and I haven't faced any issues so far. What's going on? Is my phone not actually undervolted?
Here's a screenshot...
(sorry for the horrible image quality).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undervolting increase battery life at the cost of some performance loss, especially when multitasking
ROMMaker said:
Undervolting increase battery life at the cost of some performance loss, especially when multitasking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No -_- it doesn't.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium

Categories

Resources