cf-bench v1.0 - Samsung Infuse 4G

So i used it and infuse comes in 4th...after sgs2 ,sesnsation. Atrix....i got a score of 2934...whats it mean??... B.t.w.... Im not complaining about speed on the infuse...it works very well for me..jus wondering if anyone will break it down in layman terms

Related

Overclocking the MT3G (rooted W/CM5.0.7 T5)

Just a quick simple thread, hopefully it grows into an info pit
Are there any risks with maxing out my CPU speeds on the MyTouch3G 1.2?? (not fender, but the new one with headphone jack)
I've got it overclocked, and the lil widget shows 582 most of the time. since i flashed CM5.0.7 T5 my phone is as smooth as a babies behind, lol, just curious if its because i've overclocked it or not.
Does anyone have the latest CMmod on their MT3G 1.2 and experience speed issues? a few of my friends have CM5.0.7 T5 on their mytouches, but they complain about laggage... i have yet to experience this. anyone have any comments on this matter?

Nexus One vs Galaxy S: Captivate [various bechmarks]

OK just for kicks I did a lot of different benchmarks on my N1 and Captivate since they both are running 2.2 now. I used a stock ROM for both no mods. also I know the Captivate Froyo is not a final build but it is very stable and solid so I would not think that the ATO would be THAT much different and after all we are only tasting hardware here. Anyone wondering why I did not use quadrant or linpack can search the threads (they are not very good benchmarks especially linpack) by far the best benchmark for testing raw native code processing power on a CPU is Nbench! this benchmark brings out the truth of any hardware, it is very accurate and comprehensive.
PowerPoint 2010 file is compressed as .rar and attached below!
Interesting stuff! Thanks!

[Q] Any quadrant scores?

Title. Did or can anyone run quadrant scores and post it here?
Sent from my Ally using XDA App
Standard = 1944
Hr1 Beta: MoDaCo Custom ROM =3224
Why ppl keep asking for a benchmark from an application that is worthless is beyond me. Just an FYI to everyone who looks at quadrant, it runs on one thread, aka it can only really test 1/2 of the phone, second when running quadrant on any tegra 2 device quadrant wont even max out a SINGLE core % wise. AKA its scores mean nothing...
I know. I was just wondering. I mean they mean something, at that something is something I don't know.
Sent from my Ally using XDA App
jug6ernaut said:
Why ppl keep asking for a benchmark from an application that is worthless is beyond me. Just an FYI to everyone who looks at quadrant, it runs on one thread, aka it can only really test 1/2 of the phone, second when running quadrant on any tegra 2 device quadrant wont even max out a SINGLE core % wise. AKA its scores mean nothing...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep, even with pcs I quit looking at 3d mark scores when I started noticing that 2000 extra points only gave me 1-3 fps more.
real world testing is far better than some generic benchmark. the archos 101 hits 2900, the evo 4g can reach 2700. but do they actually perform better than a tegra 2 device? well... other than high profile hd playback.

Quadrant scores are an addiction!!

Before anyone chastises me: I know that quadrant scores can be manipulated, and shouldn't be relied on to determine if your setup is adequate. I'm talking about my own personal experiences here.
I've only had an android phone for a month or so (my Captivate), so I can't claim to be experienced with it. However, like I did when experimenting with Linux distros (a long, long time ago --- settled on Slackware), I've been playing with all the ROM's available for the Captivate.
Initially, it was to get a feel of the differences in the ROM's themselves and that mostly had to do with user interface. However, I soon figured out that some were faster than others 'native', and then I discovered the Quadrant Scores.
So, I started checking Quadrant scores with each ROM under similar conditions (Wifi on, only a couple of apps running, no overclocking, etc.). This is a really horrible addiction -- I keep thinking that maybe the next ROM, or the next kernel update will make the score better - even though I've noticed that a better Quadrant score doesn't necessarily have much bearing on the performance of the Captivate.
The result: I haven't stuck with a single ROM for two days running.
I seem to have settled down recently, but we'll see.
This is a tongue-in-cheek rant, incidentally...this whole experience has been addictive.
Hi . I made 2 quadrant tests : with eclair2.1 and cm7.1.0 . With eclair2.1 i get 800-900 pcts and with cm7.1.0 1600-1700 . I didn't overclock or other setting made .
Yeah, but that's what I mean - a small change can result in better scores, so where do you stop?
So far, on my Captivate, I've found that I get the best scores with
1) Fasty III - 2500+
2) Dlev 4.2 (Talon) - 2250+ (Dlev 5 doesn't like my Captivate)
3) Biffmod (CM7 based) - 2000+
4) Miui 1.10 + Glitch kernel - 1900+
Here's the issue: I love the UI of Miui - it seems to have the best themes available and everything works smoothly. The stock browser on Fasty III is laggy, for example. The games I play work best on Miui and Fasty.
So, the Quadrant scores don't necessarily have any 'real world' meaning. Most of the lagfixed kernels seem to take care of the I/O rates, improving the scores.
Still, I can't stop trying to find a 'better' setup.
PM'ed reinbeau to close.
Quadrant scores mean nothing, I can enter a single code and get over 3000 on a stock RFS partitioned ROM with no OC/UV (Which is incredible) but it means nothing because the Quadrant app is outdated and wasn't meant for the Hummingbird processor, nor Gingerbread on the phones, or dual core.
seems the higher my score gets the worse my phone runs.
Its all about balance
Thread closed.

Chrome Beta for ICS Benchmarks

Anyone give it a go yet?
Browsermark scores 77,000-86,000 High being 86,019
Sprint Nexus S 4G
CM9.0.0-RC0-NS4G-KANG
CPU tuned 1.4ghz (interactive)
I know interactive is probably not the best to use for this, but it's been the most stable and realistic for me so far.
Just saw that this is available now but for only 4.0+ Will there be a way to have this installed on gingerbread?
The only Browser benchmark worth running is one that involves using a stopwatch.
No doubt there will be side-by-side comparison videos up on youtube soon too.

Categories

Resources