Anyone give it a go yet?
Browsermark scores 77,000-86,000 High being 86,019
Sprint Nexus S 4G
CM9.0.0-RC0-NS4G-KANG
CPU tuned 1.4ghz (interactive)
I know interactive is probably not the best to use for this, but it's been the most stable and realistic for me so far.
Just saw that this is available now but for only 4.0+ Will there be a way to have this installed on gingerbread?
The only Browser benchmark worth running is one that involves using a stopwatch.
No doubt there will be side-by-side comparison videos up on youtube soon too.
Related
This is the final part in a 5 part series of Android performance benchmarking apps. Quadrant is probably the most popular Android performance benchmark app available today. First made popular in videos showing the (then) upcoming Galaxy S, it's been making the rounds as people jump on board to test their Android phones against the big guns. Quadrant is an all-around, full-featured performance test that measures all aspects of your phone's performance for a full rundown of how powerful it truly is. Some of the things analyzed are the CPU, 3D performance, and Memory, among others. Check out the video for a full demo of the app. Be sure to download today for a great app to compare Android phones, compare ROMs, or just have fun using one of the hottest apps on Android. Then go brag to all your iPhone friends. Do it.
Let me know in the comments which app is your favorite, or if you have any other great benchmarking apps!
Part 5: Quadrant for All-Around Performance Testing
For Part 4, check out Fps2D for 2D FPS Benchmarking
For Part 3, check out Linpack, the Most Popular CPU Performance Test
For Part 2, check out Necore for 3D Graphics Performance
For Part 1, check out Benchmark Pi for CPU Performance Benchmarking
I always liked Linpack.
Wouldn't it be nice to have all of this in one application, with similar framework and standardized test methods?
And would it be nice if you were able to extract ALL of the information out of your phone regarding Build, CPU features, Video subsystem, network subsystem, etc?
I wonder what such an app should be called? (seriously, I can't decide on a name. PhoneAnalyzer just seems... blah)
Dont forget GLBenchmark.
I dont think there is one for the Evo but I used the Incredible one.
http://glbenchmark.com/
Doward said:
Wouldn't it be nice to have all of this in one application, with similar framework and standardized test methods?
And would it be nice if you were able to extract ALL of the information out of your phone regarding Build, CPU features, Video subsystem, network subsystem, etc?
I wonder what such an app should be called? (seriously, I can't decide on a name. PhoneAnalyzer just seems... blah)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely would be. Quadrant gets close. I think a combo of Quadrant, Phonalyzr, and SystemApp would be an app not to be reckoned with
Am i the only one that has noticed my score is about 500 points lower for gaming when i'm on CM RC1 compared to Stock 2.3.2?
RC1 gives me a score of about 2600 while stock gives 3k+ while using Smartbench.
I wonder if this is due to the video drivers not being fully up to date or optimized on the CM builds?
I have also noticed that quadrant scores do not seam to be affected whether on CM or Stock. My experience with the N1 was CM helped with performance a lot.
What do you guys think about this? Have you experienced the same?
TheRiceKing said:
Am i the only one that has noticed my score is about 500 points lower for gaming when i'm on CM RC1 compared to Stock 2.3.2?
RC1 gives me a score of about 2600 while stock gives 3k+ while using Smartbench.
I wonder if this is due to the video drivers not being fully up to date or optimized on the CM builds?
I have also noticed that quadrant scores do not seam to be affected whether on CM or Stock. My experience with the N1 was CM helped with performance a lot.
What do you guys think about this? Have you experienced the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I normally run at 1.4GHz and get about 3.3-3.4k on the games index. (Just got 3232). I don't really ever run on stock so its hard to say but I can say that I've hit 1800/3700 at 1.6GHz before.
i am running infused 1.3.1 andon quadrant i would score 1500-1750 but on smartbench i would get 915-1015 on cpu and pretty close to 3000 on gpu , i have two questions, are those score from smart bench good and secondly which should i take more seriously quadrant or smart bench
silver258 said:
i am running infused 1.3.1 andon quadrant i would score 1500-1750 but on smartbench i would get 915-1015 on cpu and pretty close to 3000 on gpu , i have two questions, are those score from smart bench good and secondly which should i take more seriously quadrant or smart bench
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of it matters... The phone runs good doesn't it? that is all that should matter
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
Wtf good is an insult its beyond good i came from iphone 3gs lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
if you buy the full version of quadrant you get more information, i am totally against the idea of just stacking scores like quadrant does. that being said smart benchmark attempts to make a simple compsite score that is more relevant than the otheres do using some kind of algorithm to balance the weight of each componant, i dont agree with that either.
if you want to benchmark to figure out what you have improved specifically then get antutu or pay for quadrant but never look at the cumulative scores, it is totally irrelevant.
if you want to see how the performance compare acording to an algorithm get smart benchmark
if you want to be impressed with the phone, run a 3d/opengl benchmark. or otherwise play some H.264 codec .mkv videos at 720p (1080p also works but at a lower bitrate and class, the 720 video would likely look better) then try the same video on an atrix and an inspire.
Hey guys,
I noticed that there was some lag when i was playing for example Riptide or Shadowgun..then I installed System Panel to monitor my cpu clock speed while i'm playing shadowgun and this is what it showed:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/43585032/2012-04-11_22-52-02.png
This processor runs barely half the speed of what its capable of. this is causing fps drops..
Does anyone have an idea of whats going on there? Are you suffering from the same problem?
Edit:
SuperPi seems to stress out the dual core properly:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/43585032/2012-04-11_23-46-52.png
Why don't the games? Is this why the games aren't optimized yet or is this a system-issue?
greets,
ossy1337
Aren't those optimized for the tegra 2/3 or are they readily available apps?
Yes they're tegra optimized but they ran flawlessly on my Galaxy S2..
Hope the games will be optimized in the next few days/weeks
this is a bug in htc kernel .... and we wait for someone to fix it like in HTC Sensation
w1000i said:
this is a bug in htc kernel .... and we wait for someone to fix it like in HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it has more to do with ICS.. the Galaxy Nexus only runs at half clockspeed most of the time as well. Hell when I had mine it ran at the lowest clockspeed the majority of the time, and only when playing N64 could I bump it up to 700mhz. But hey if it's not lagging who cares (in the case of the Nexus)
I installed setcpu and decreased the up threshold to 40% ..before it was on 90% which means that the cpu only clocked up at 90% cpu load.. now it does at 40%. this solved my problem
+1 sounds like the best solution. Battery life may be sacrificed but hey, 90% is pretty ridiculous
If you weren't using tegra based games use shadowgun and riptide. Used the playstore ones you would get no frames drops. Mostly likely chainfire 3d developer would need an one s as it a vastly different from s3 processors. I personally have both on a SamsungGalaxySII with s3 processors with no frame drops. GPU configuration might not play nice with Krait.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Finally released... :thumbup:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application
Downloading now!
Dont know if this should be here or in General...
I have only something around 1100 on the default test. Very poor result. Kernel Hydracore, newest JB stock. What can be wrong ? Someone has an idea ?
What are you running it on?
If this version of 3d Mark is anything like the PC version, the tests won't necessarily give you a 'real world' result.
3D Mark doesn't scale down effects to suit devices, it will throw the full array of OpenGL v2 effects to give a baseline score.
Unless you've got a top of the range powerful device, expect low scores.
This benchmark software is bloated to say the least, there are better benchmarkers that will do a great job giving scores for bragging rights, AnTuTu is a reliable one with good features in it's free version.