Database Info

[KERNEL][GPL][ACS]Xtreme Kernel v1.2.0-Lucy-1.3GHz OC,Battery,Tweaked Voodoo(options)

ANDROID CREATIVE SYNDICATE​presents​XTREME KERNEL V1.2.0​
First of all, I want to put my thank yous up here at the top, so, here they are:
-geniusdog254 - My primary teammate, been helping me every step of way.
-nullghost - One really cool dude. Always on when I ask for help. Git would still be a scary thing if not for him.
-rjmjr69 - Funny, funny dude. Keeps me motivated to keep going
-The Voodoo Team - Your work is awesome!
-My beta testers - You were/are all great. Thanks for helping me with this!
-All the devs across the board - Seriously, you're all a bunch of absolutely awesome people.
-Anyone I forgot - You're all great!
Now, here we go:
THE STANDARD DISCLAIMER
I, DevinXtreme, AM NOT responsible for what happens to your phone, your cat, your house, or anything relating to you! If your phone bricks, OH WELL. Have a nice day.
This kernel has a MixUp kernel base. DI18, blah blah. I deviated once Interactive got working. I also removed the Voodoo color modification. So, there's that.
It is built and designed for Syndicate ROM, which will be out later tonight. Sickest ROM you've ever seen. The version released with the ROM is slightly different, but only for fun's sake
Changelog:
v1.2.0
-Removed the 1.6GHz step. The time machine is gone. Plus, was causing more problems than it was helping.
-Added 1.3GHz step courtesy Herver
-Switched from MPLL to APLL. Smoothness and speed increase. Thanks to nullghost for help on this.
-Added Voodoo color mod, tweaked version, courtesy Herver. I will be maintaining a no-voodoo version. I just haven't yet.
-Tweaked the light sensor, adding a new step and made it not jump to the brightest setting as much. Should save battery and transition smoother. Also pols a little more often.
-Tweaked scaling rules for 1.3GHz. Should scale there less, thus saving battery.
ADDITION: The file ending in 'nv.zip' is a no-voodoo version. The file ending in 'ov.zip' is the version for the original voodoo mod, not the tweaked one.
v1.0.1
-Fixed scaling. Linpack scores and tests work fine now.
-Disabled Carrier IQ in init.rc. Carrier IQ is essentially Sprint spyware. Kernel devs: This is really easy to do. Just comment out the iqmsd lines at the end.
v1.0
-Overclock to 1.6GHz!! Requires SetCPU which is, for some reason, defaulting to performance. Make sure you change it to conservative.
-Default governor without SetCPU is conservative with 200MHz-1GHz steps.
-Removed Voodoo
-Framerate unlocked (78-80fps)
-Built for ROMs with a custom boot. Makes stock boot look like garbage. We're working (still) to fix this.
-Undervolted
KNOWN BUGS:
-In spare parts, if you set the WiFi policy to never sleep, it still sleeps with the screen off. -skandranon314
-Some weird vibration thing going on when 1.6GHz is hit.
NOTES:
Linpack is being strange with this. I'm getting between 9.2 and 9.8 with some REALLY strange numbers. I'll have this fixed this weekend.
SetCPU sets the default governor to performance. If you use it, be sure to change it immediately for battery life.
FOR 1.2
-I recommend 200MHz-1200MHz. Some phones can't reach 1.3GHz safely.
-200MHz - 800/1000MHz is a great setting for battery and you should still have a very smooth experience.
For those who care, I get 1135+ in quadrant.
You can read my source here.
Thanks, guys. I hope you enjoy!

How stable is this??

When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Looking forward to trying this out!

1.6 GHz???????
That's awesome, though I don't think I'll crank it that high.
Is there any advantage to this vs MixUp running at 1.0 Ghz?

spitefulrain said:
How stable is this??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've hit no bumps, neither have my testers.
joshottley said:
When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give it a couple of hours.
SORRY, HAD TO TAKE IT DOWN FOR JUST A LITTLE BIT. EXPECT AT ~12:45AM MST.

Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??

I'm running it. Smooth so far.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Dusting the epic off now.

[email protected] said:
Dusting the epic off now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should have never abandoned dude lol.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Very smooth so far. got 1194 on quad, and 9.2 average on linpack. Wonder how the battery life will fare.

spitefulrain said:
Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!

DevinXtreme said:
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?

Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.

spitefulrain said:
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it'll be a good idea.

what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable

illogic6 said:
Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I was gonna say. I'm going good with Neocore as well.
d94 said:
what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of it is on my git. I release my source, as devs should with GPL. The problem is that the fsb isn't scaled properly, affecting the floating point processor, causing low Linpack scores. I'll have it worked out this weekend,

Bummer.... I missed the link the first go around..... Will be waiting
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

If this was a hero_over post, he'd be in trouble for a teaser post lol... just trolling lol. Had to have a smart ass comment

Quick. And stable so far
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

[gpl][kernel]Bakedsnack1.4 Kernel

Hey guys just wanted to share the kernel from my 1.4 rom. of course its not gunna be as fast on other roms as ive built it around my rom but i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed.
this kernel overclocks to 1.3ghz but may not work for everyone considering everyones phone is different. (some people cant run 1.2!)
http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/herospecial.zip (lowest voltages for 1.3ghz)
http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/1.4.stock.zip (the stock kernel from baked 1.4)
source code: http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/sickybrapbraps.tar.gz (uploading)
oh and battery is very good

"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?

KitsunePaws said:
"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm quite sure. Test their 1.6ghz versus my 1.0ghz. Tell me what you find. And 1.3 is just stupid fast

KitsunePaws said:
"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
And to be fair, I've only tested ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4. I'm sure on Syndicate ROM, xtreme kernel performs better, just as herospecial probably performs better on Bakedsnack ROM.

mattallica76 said:
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not much of a surprise there... This kernel was built for Baked Snack, and our kernel was built for SyndicateROM!

mattallica76 said:
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be faster on any rom. But there are many other tweaks to my rom making it the fastest on that

k0nane said:
Not much of a surprise there... This kernel was built for Baked Snack, and our kernel was built for SyndicateROM!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't get 1.4 kernel to work on syndacite rom..
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

mrkrabs said:
I can't get 1.4 kernel to work on syndacite rom..
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did it flash correctly? Must be dom additions they made in init.rc. will look into it. Try hersospecial just to be sure

To Mr. Herver
Could you please give me a link to your wallpaper you have on Baked Snack 1.3? I just love it!!

Hero_Over said:
Did it flash correctly? Must be dom additions they made in init.rc. will look into it. Try hersospecial just to be sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given that init.rc is in the initramfs, and that your kernel should be/is overwriting it, that's probably not the issue. We did remove iqmsd after killing it in init.rc, but chances are that won't affect anything (unlike libiq_client.so and libiq_service.so, which remain).

k0nane said:
Given that init.rc is in the initramfs, and that your kernel should be/is overwriting it, that's probably not the issue. We did remove iqmsd after killing it in init.rc, but chances are that won't affect anything (unlike libiq_client.so and libiq_service.so, which remain).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not overwritin anything. Unless you have a pointless initramfs folder in your rom. I was saying that maybe your boot setup in init.rc may differ. Guess not but it sounds ramdisk related unless I uploaded the wrong file. Great work on acs by the way. Looks good

Hero_Over said:
Its not overwritin anything. Unless you have a pointless initramfs folder in your rom. I was saying that maybe your boot setup in init.rc may differ. Guess not but it sounds ramdisk related unless I uploaded the wrong file. Great work on acs by the way. Looks good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean SyndicateROM? ACS, the Android Creative Syndicate, is our team. But thank you, we're looking to continue to improve.

sniperkill said:
Could you please give me a link to your wallpaper you have on Baked Snack 1.3? I just love it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill include it with 1.4 which ill post soon!

Dude, if you want anyone to test your 1.4 kernel to prove a point, you need to post your 1.4 rom that goes along with It. For free.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

ericizzy1 said:
Dude, if you want anyone to test your 1.4 kernel to prove a point, you need to post your 1.4 rom that goes along with It. For free.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you failed to read the last post I did lol
Hasn't anybody evn tried the kernel?

Will be looking forward
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Yes Herver, but since I like testing, I find myself flashing and trying different ROMs / kernel combinations on a weekly basis. I have to say, herospecial.zip (1.3 ghz @ stock voltage) was ridiculously fast and stable for me. I've also had the best battery life from Hero's ROMs, and 1.4 is no different. Currently, I'm testing out SyndicateROM which is running Devin's Xtreme kernel, and that is also very solid. Might keep it for a while unless I can't get good battery life like I used to get with yours. It all depends on preference, I really like your themed out ROMs too, but may play around with Syndicate for a bit. Even schizo's Epic Experience is something I test around in between all this as well.
I'm just glad we're finally getting to see the potential of this phone due to developers like yourselves. Much appreciated

"Im replying to a few posts up" just forgot to hit quote button, lol.Baked Snack rom does post his roms for free, he just gives his donators first dibbs.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

I'm running syndicate rom 1.0.1 bakedsnack special kernel wouldn't boot. Fix it and ill try again. I've used your rom before. Nice work hero.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

nimaim said:
Yes Herver, but since I like testing, I find myself flashing and trying different ROMs / kernel combinations on a weekly basis. I have to say, herospecial.zip (1.3 ghz @ stock voltage) was ridiculously fast and stable for me. I've also had the best battery life from Hero's ROMs, and 1.4 is no different. Currently, I'm testing out SyndicateROM which is running Devin's Xtreme kernel, and that is also very solid. Might keep it for a while unless I can't get good battery life like I used to get with yours. It all depends on preference, I really like your themed out ROMs too, but may play around with Syndicate for a bit. Even schizo's Epic Experience is something I test around in between all this as well.
I'm just glad we're finally getting to see the potential of this phone due to developers like yourselves. Much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much. I believe I've seen you on my forums. Any other takers. How does it do!

[KERNEL][28 APR]LorDMod|SMARTASS|BFSv400|CFS|SLQB|UV|1.99GHz|VOL|V DD|SQ LITE3|

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1020637
DON'T USE THE ROM, IT IS OUTDATED AND HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED!
DO NOT USE THE "PUV" (Pinky UnderVolt) VERSION, IT WILL CAUSE YOUR DEVICE TO GET STUCK AT THE SPLASHSCREEN! (POSSIBLY)
I DID NOT MAKE THIS KERNEL, I'M JUST POSTING IT HERE FOR YOU ALL.
THIS IS NOT FOR ANY OTHER ROMS BESIDES CM7 (AND CM7-BASED ROMS) AND MIUI, SO DON'T ASK!
I'm using the UUV CFS version. It is very fast and smooth, I urge you not to have an OC past 1.3GHz as a daily driver, unless you want horrible battery life.
Any option below PUV is safe (UUV, -50mV, and -25mV all work, but every device varies).

i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.

dethpikil said:
i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?

vln004 said:
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.

Been running his kernels for a couple of weeks, no issues. It is nice to be able to choose from different undervolt versions. Helps battery life a little, around 5%-10% in my experience.

NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.

henrybravo said:
NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk

dethpikil said:
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.

rasroygbiv said:
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful, the PUV version softbricked my device. Easily fixable through reflashing your ROM or just a new kernel.
It may not brick yours because some devices can handle it, some can't.

helushune said:
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Not "iffy" at all.

I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

TheBassman369 said:
I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently pulling two days at 64% with the same kernel but my CPU settings are 122 min - 1075 max.

So what's everyone recommendations for the best version of this Kernel in terms of both optimum battery and performance?
Additionally... what kinds of CPU governors and max-min frequencies are you using? I've seen a few post what their using in this thread, but I'd like to get some more opinions.

I've been using this Kernel for a few weeks now with no issues. The UUV had some slight hesitation when scrolling so now I'm running 4.3 CFS with the -50 UV and it's absolutely perfect. Fantastic battery life running at 122/1305 MHz with the -50 UV.

i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.

substance12 said:
i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Default is no undervoltage.
Cell Standby and Phone Idle are my two biggest "battery killers" but that's normal operation.

henrybravo said:
+1. Not "iffy" at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.

Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?

dethpikil said:
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure did. Pardon.
sugardaddy1979 said:
Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check these two posts: Post 1, Post 2. Looks like BFQ is the standard scheduler and VIO is quicker on paper (kind of like BFS vs CFS).

Thanks for the explanation. The bfqhs seems much smoother than the io. I am running it with the uuv.

[Q] Safe Overclock Speed?

Hello everybody I looked all over the Infuse Forums for a Safe OverClock Speed... but i couldnt find anything... so im sry if i missed it... Does anybody know of safe number? thanks in advanced!!

seijyennite said:
Hello everybody I looked all over the Infuse Forums for a Safe OverClock Speed... but i couldnt find anything... so im sry if i missed it... Does anybody know of safe number? thanks in advanced!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All CPU's are different. Some phones will have no problem running at 1.6ghz. Some will. It's a trial and error thing.
If you are worried, start conservative and work your way up.

would you say that overclocking your phone is worth it? i know that it can really improve the performance of the phone... but it greatly decreases the battery life... and vice versa u can lower it and increase bat life n lower performance. im looking at opinions also thanks for the reply!!

seijyennite said:
would you say that overclocking your phone is worth it? i know that it can really improve the performance of the phone... but it greatly decreases the battery life... and vice versa u can lower it and increase bat life n lower performance. im looking at opinions also thanks for the reply!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally have the Infusion kernel running on my phone, which allows me to OC my device, but I don't want to. I've come across no normal instance when I've found that I needed the extra power. I mainly wanted it so that I could undervolt (UV) which improves battery life.
Adding a custom ROM and also adding voodoo (most ROM's have voodoo) will increase the performance of your phone.
I'm running Infusion 2.0 on Infused 1.5.3 right now (waiting for GB HDMI capabilities...thanks AT&T) and I'm loving it.

sweet man thx for the reply!! ive been looking for a custom rom to install but just havnt found one that i like yet... i like Miui but they dont have one built for the Infuse yet... so im kinda waiting on that... but who knows when that will come out..

seijyennite said:
sweet man thx for the reply!! ive been looking for a custom rom to install but just havnt found one that i like yet... i like Miui but they dont have one built for the Infuse yet... so im kinda waiting on that... but who knows when that will come out..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how miui looks too. I'm running launcher pro with a miui icon pack installed. Compromises...
oh well!
Oh and I think some people actually do have MIUI, not sure who, but I know it does exist in some unofficial form or another for the infuse.

ah cool!! i cant wait for miui!! what is launcher pro? if u dont mind me asking...

seijyennite said:
ah cool!! i cant wait for miui!! what is launcher pro? if u dont mind me asking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Launcher Pro is a homescreen alternative. You can change things up, add different transition effects.
For instance, my homescreen is attached.

EricNagel said:
I personally have the Infusion kernel running on my phone, which allows me to OC my device, but I don't want to. I've come across no normal instance when I've found that I needed the extra power. I mainly wanted it so that I could undervolt (UV) which improves battery life.
Adding a custom ROM and also adding voodoo (most ROM's have voodoo) will increase the performance of your phone.
I'm running Infusion 2.0 on Infused 1.5.3 right now (waiting for GB HDMI capabilities...thanks AT&T) and I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App

EricNagel said:
I personally have the Infusion kernel running on my phone, which allows me to OC my device, but I don't want to. I've come across no normal instance when I've found that I needed the extra power. I mainly wanted it so that I could undervolt (UV) which improves battery life.
Adding a custom ROM and also adding voodoo (most ROM's have voodoo) will increase the performance of your phone.
I'm running Infusion 2.0 on Infused 1.5.3 right now (waiting for GB HDMI capabilities...thanks AT&T) and I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto same setup here and i consider myself super lucky but i can push the overclock up to 1.8 with voltage control play N64 emulator (starfox,mariokart) all day long and its perfectly stable with undervolt settings..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

EricNagel said:
I like how miui looks too. I'm running launcher pro with a miui icon pack installed. Compromises...
oh well!
Oh and I think some people actually do have MIUI, not sure who, but I know it does exist in some unofficial form or another for the infuse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mikey passed out 1-2 MIUI builds as a proof of concept on IRC a while back, but it took the existing problems with CM7 (MIUI is layered over CM7) and added new ones, so it's on hold until more of the issues with base CM7 get fixed.
mv1luv said:
Ditto same setup here and i consider myself super lucky but i can push the overclock up to 1.8 with voltage control play N64 emulator (starfox,mariokart) all day long and its perfectly stable with undervolt settings..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no way you took your device to 1.8 - our devices can't go past 1.6 without overclocking the system bus, and the system bus does NOT like to overclock. The best anyone has done was around 1664 MHz and it was unstable as hell for a lot of people.
Some versions of Infusion reported operating at 1.8, but that's because bedwa made some mistakes in his PLL calculations - he thought those settings would run the CPU at 1.8 but they actually ran it at around 1.55

Way to burst my bubble.. I learned something new today thankyou

mv1luv said:
Way to burst my bubble.. I learned something new today thankyou
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fastest anyone has reported to have gotten a hummingbird legitamately that i have seen was a kernel for the fascinate that had a really goofy timing stucture and had problems with other hardware. they reported the cpu running @ 1.7ghz with the gpu and bus at some really goofy speeds and fluctuated as the cpu scaled. it looked like a total mess.

Really the highest most people can go is 1.6 stable, which is what I'm running at.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App

I downloaded setcpu but I can't tell if my phone is being overclocked... I also installed infused on my phone...not sure if that would make
a difference
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

I just downloaded voltage control but not sure exactly how to tweak it with out messing something up...anybody have a quick run down (good / bad)?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997

Camaro1LE said:
I just downloaded voltage control but not sure exactly how to tweak it with out messing something up...anybody have a quick run down (good / bad)?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cfq/ on demand or conservitaive.
Undervolting is hit or Miss for each phone so hard to justify what's good just try and see
Overclock- I'm at 1600 with min at 100 and have to say no issues I love Oc.
.......infuse.....Infused....infusion.........

My max is 1664 and it locks up sometimes so i backed it down to 1456. Is there a quick guide to use voltage control
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997

Camaro1LE said:
My max is 1664 and it locks up sometimes so i backed it down to 1456. Is there a quick guide to use voltage control
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your on froyo use the a kernel its more stable buddy. What exactly do you need to know?
.......infuse.....Infused....infusion.........

Im running infused 1.6.0 w/ core B kernel. I read people adjusting certain areas to make it more stable and increase speed and battery...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997

Anyone using note 3 n900 (WELCOME)

I don't know if it's right to open this thread....
But I can't post anything in the development section.
I'm using this site for four years at least and can't ask any questions i have.
My question is to @halaszk88 who made the kernel of n900 (or anyone have answer)
I use his kernel since 5 month it's so amazing but why he didn't put all primary things that kernel must have (in my opinion) like:
-Touch to wake (like googy max kernel for s3)
-Pegasusq governor(handle the game very well)
-Accept UHS memory card like sandisk (the files and folders disappear randomly)
-Combine the kernel with other app like trickster mod (because it's have lovely options like: time of the device in deep sleep and you can change all the voltages of cpu in one click and other stuff like these )
I'm not a developer, but I can learn fast
if any one can help or explain I'm very appreciate
Thank you all for this great site

Anyone!!!!
or at least post my request to halaszk88 thread if it's ok

Still waiting

having the same problem as you bro lol... having been on here shorter than you i find it odd you have to have a minimum of 10 post before you can post in the dev side... i also have a n900 and want to ask some questions, so sign of relief that i saw your post lol... ive used halaszk kernal but have been very disappointed with it, cant find any settings that wont over heat and lock up my phone... being one of two kernals that can be OverClock and volt regulated kernal, i find the pekaka-Kernel much better as far as being able to OC without overheating... One thing i cant understand is why i cant get thru an antutu benchmark without halaszk kernal rebooting my phone... so ya got a score of 36620 (antutu) with the pekaka-Kernel OC to 2Ghz... but hope all goes well sir and hope this helps us both so we can start posting where the devs will actually see our questions.

You are absolutely right bro
my phone also get heat with this kernel.....
we must have to get in halaszk88 thread very soon
see you there in couple of days man
thank you for posting here

not a problem man... just seems that this cpu architecture isnt the greatest for overclocking and with the discussion of not getting the HMP implement im kinda about to give up on tweaking my phone... seems these devs cant make a stable enough kernal (roms seem fine) that can handle the OC and heat. but as far as the pekaka-Kernel i would suggest that one for now until halaszk can fix his issues with overheating...
here my setup
[ROM][SM-N900] alba19986's (Lite version) Added TW deleted Nova Launcher :good:
pekaka-Kernel:N900XXUDNA6-2.0|N900-v7.2|Permissive|OC-2.0G|UV
big core: OC 2.0G
LITTLE core: 550mhz
did not touch default volt settings (2Ghz '1262mV')

mikewhitejr said:
not a problem man... just seems that this cpu architecture isnt the greatest for overclocking and with the discussion of not getting the HMP implement im kinda about to give up on tweaking my phone... seems these devs cant make a stable enough kernal (roms seem fine) that can handle the OC and heat. but as far as the pekaka-Kernel i would suggest that one for now until halaszk can fix his issues with overheating...
here my setup
[ROM][SM-N900] alba19986's (Lite version) Added TW deleted Nova Launcher :good:
pekaka-Kernel:N900XXUDNA6-2.0|N900-v7.2|Permissive|OC-2.0G|UV
big core: OC 2.0G
LITTLE core: 550mhz
did not touch default volt settings (2Ghz '1262mV')
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try pekaka kernel soon with your settings and let you know what it's performance on my phone.
because i use stock rom
Thank you man

ya those settings seem to be ok... got bored and up my minimum cpu setting from 550mhz to 900mhz just to see if there was any performance increasse... seems to be faster but the Antutu benchtests still remain the same, around 34 to 36k... ive also tried to UV and OV and found out that OVing more than once or twice will freeze my phone cause it over heats it... once i get into the ACTUAL forms ill ask more questions to halaszk about volt settings cause it uses about the same as the peka kernal but overheats quicker... mayb ill just tinker with it some more and find a good setting... wish me luck xD

Hi
good luck forever bro
i tried pekaka-Kernel 2.1 version ( bbecause I'm on 4.4.2) it seems very good and my phone performance getting up.
It's missing many setting that halaszk88 have.
but the performance is amazing....
Thank you bro

Apparitionfirst said:
Hi
good luck forever bro
i tried pekaka-Kernel 2.1 version ( bbecause I'm on 4.4.2) it seems very good and my phone performance getting up.
It's missing many setting that halaszk88 have.
but the performance is amazing....
Thank you bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea the downfall of this kernal is that there are less settings to play with but it is a hell of alot more stable ( my opinion ) than halaszk.
feeling kinda of down tho cause even tho this is an awesome phone, i feel i should have went with the n9005 since there are more DEVs there than here. Im grateful for the DEVs we have but really dissapointed when it comes to Kernals that are out there. about only 2 good kernals possibly 3 (goodhanrry) but at max halaszk can only OC at 2.1ghz ( and it heats up ur CPU like a motherF***).
three more post and im in there... early congratz for only one more (post) for you man GL

I'll post in halasz88 thread soon....
but all thanks to you bro for let me post there