I doubt, my experience with bberry was that it always runs one to two versions behind after they release the phone.
Nevertheless, checking up the ATT, after a tip at Boy Genius website, visited the support page that shows how to update from I897UCJF6 to I897UCJH7. At the bottom of the page there is a link on how to find out which version of the software you are running, photos showing Android 2.2 running i897UCJK1.
here is the link for those that are curious http://www.wireless.att.com/support...ting+Started&tutorialId=825930&deviceId=12000
check at bottom of the page the link under related topic to get the specs of the phone used for this tutorial.
Have fund with this, perhaps is the only froyo we will get from ATT
That page has been there for at least a month now. It's not new.
See what I posted here on Jan. 20 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10767850&postcount=9
Which comes from an AT&T forum poster a few days earlier (sorry can't find the link to that post).
There have been a couple reports of this on the internet already. Its a good sign...it certainly can't hurt. A better sign would be if they would just release the software already. But after all...its only 5 months after they promised it...give them time for god's sake!
Att atrix 4g
Software Spec: ATRIX 4G = Android (2.2)
You aren't the first person to ask this question.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=946940
Please search the forum when posting info to see if you can already find your answer.
As stated by the title, I know we are waiting for the Honeycomb source to be released before any Honeycomb roms are developed for the Gtab. But, and it's a big But!, Now that google has said they are delaying the release of the HC source are we going to see some Honeycomb SDK ports? Or are we going to wait until the true source is released? I don't really mind either way, it's just a question that is on my mind and I'm sure is on the mind of others here.
Your question has been answered before on several closed "honeycomb" threads during the release timeframe of Xoom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=854632&highlight=honeycomb
If you do a search, you will find a lot of info.. In a couple of HC threads, the conversation got very heated between a few members and the dev.. it is why the mods decided to ban "honeycomb" thread. Did the mods say no honeycream thread too?
This thread is one of the HC classic.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=968409
While I think your question is valid and worth asking (although as indicated above, you probably could have found it by searching), The question I have is 'Did this deserve another thread?'. Clearly you knew posting new HC threads was a bad idea. Why not ask your question in the 'Official' HC thread?
Zaphod-Beeblebrox said:
While I think your question is valid and worth asking (although as indicated above, you probably could have found it by searching), The question I have is 'Did this deserve another thread?'. Clearly you knew posting new HC threads was a bad idea. Why not ask your question in the 'Official' HC thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most new members are not familiar with the search.. plus, you cannot post a question to the official HC thread. You can send private question though.
I am with Dcon87 that it is also on my mind but I am just not going to ask.. Once a while, the Mod updated the official HC thread with update....
so, just be patience.. everyone!
tyy10002 said:
Most new members are not familiar with the search.. plus, you cannot post a question to the official HC thread. You can send private question though.
I am with Dcon87 that it is also on my mind but I am just not going to ask.. Once a while, the Mod updated the official HC thread with update....
so, just be patience.. everyone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough. I didn't realize the official thread was locked. Thought you could post to it.
As for any ports of the SDK, I don't think you will see anything on that front.
The SDK was compiled for the emulator (an ARM emulator). Thus, ports are showing up for phones/devices that run an ARM based chip. Being a Tegra device, that compilation won't run on our tablets.
You may see some renewed interest in trying to pull out certain APKs, but even that has the stumbling block of likely being dependent on the new framework and fragments API.
As much as I'd like to see HC in action on this tablet, and as ticked as I am at google for this move, I think we are basically 'stuck'. Without the source, you are basically pissing up rope
IBTL lol
Agree, without the source, it is hard for the dev to cook. I am following the Notion Ink hack forum.. and they basically said the same, the good news is that Notion Ink claimed that they are working on Honeycomb....
Just wondering will Viewsonic/malata send requests to google to get the honeycomb source? As I read it, tablet makers can make requests to access to the source as long as they are using it only on tablets.
tyy10002 said:
Just wondering will Viewsonic/malata send requests to google to get the honeycomb source? As I read it, tablet makers can make requests to access to the source as long as they are using it only on tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering they just unloaded 10,000 GTabs on Woot and the retail channels are having a fire sale right now, I don't think Viewsonic will be doing anything related to decent software changes.
h3llphyre said:
Considering they just unloaded 10,000 GTabs on Woot and the retail channels are having a fire sale right now, I don't think Viewsonic will be doing anything related to decent software changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are right. Viewsonic probably won't do anything to it but we may be surprised. I thought last update was the final one.. now, they are releasing another one with the lockscreen. who knows.. Back to Dec last year, the VP of Product marketing of Viewsonic answered some questions in this forum, and I "wish" he is back with some answers on the future of the gtab.. probably in my dream.. =P
IDK if this has been posted yet but we will not be getting a good honeycomb port since Nvidia won't support tabs like ours past froyo
Couple days old news lol. Check the general section.
Thread closed, as it is in the wrong section and a duplicate.
Came across this .... someone else found it im just reposting it here in the hope that maybe it is new and might help....Im not a dev so i have no idea if its new....It looks like LG dropped new GB source. They pulled the source they released (on 8/16 I think) and I just saw that a new one is out there. It IS a different file from the orig release....
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource.jsp
link broken?
Posted already in the original source threads days ago.
Sent from my Calculator with Android.
Sorry fixed the link... I posted it because it said New source code.... Like I said Im not a dev so I have no idea if its different .... Just trying to help.....Sorry for posting if its the same or it has been posted already....
I looked at the new release, as far as the kernel source is concerned, it is exactly the same as the old release.
Saw this on Android Central, with link to Motorola. https://forums.motorola.com/pages/00add97d6c Updated 12/6/12. Atrix 2 not on JB update. I don't venture here too much but didn't see an immediate thread with the update so thought I would pass on. I think most knew it wasn't going to happen when they rolled out the Trade Up program.
Disregard, thought 12/6/12 update made it "official". Mods please delete my clutter.
ed20910 said:
Saw this on Android Central, with link to Motorola. https://forums.motorola.com/pages/00add97d6c Updated 12/6/12. Atrix 2 not on JB update. I don't venture here too much but didn't see an immediate thread with the update so thought I would pass on. I think most knew it wasn't going to happen when they rolled out the Trade Up program.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already been covered to death. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1946039
Please search next time before posting a new thread.