Now, you may have seen the other CM7 thread, and those who saw it know it was a cluster*MOD EDIT*. I'm just going to clear up some of the misinformation about the port.
1. I am currently running CM7 on my phone.
2. It is not a dual boot, unlike supercurio's NSONSGS work, it is an actual rom.
3. It is only being developed for the i9000, but with a few reorientations, it's usable as captivate rom.
4. There are no official releases for either phone, you must build from source. Instructions are on the CM forums.
Any other questions, I'm happy to answer. I just don't like when misinformation is wrongly spread.
Sorry about that. Heh heh. I apologize for that thread.
So couple questions.
1 If it's a full ROM did you have to convert NAND to EXT4 as well? My understanding was the WHOLE file system on NS was EXT4.
2 If you did have to convert it, have you tried going back to any other "regular" ROM's?
Thanks for the information/clarification. Honestly though, I think it's unfair to single out DG, he's helped alot of people here. If he is wrong he's wrong but no need to hate.
Rikusaki said:
Sorry about that. Heh heh. I apologize for that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's okay, I understand the interest and excitement. Just have to check your facts before posting.
I would just like to add, do want
Thanks for starting a new thread, as you said, clusterf*ck. Out of curiosity, as I'm still syncing repo, did you reorient the kernel yourself or did it come with the repo?
TheEscapist said:
Any other questions, I'm happy to answer. I just don't like when misinformation is wrongly spread. *cough*DesignGears*cough*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
misinformation? They are using supercurios kernel work to boot it. (i said KERNEL not initram, where the dual boot comes from)
If there is any further work being done by codeworkx and others, its in private., but I can tell you there is NO chatter in the dev channel, hasn't been in some time.
Can't we just get over everything and stop with the petty insults... This thread is going downhill already, lets try and keep it clean.
rob989_69 said:
So couple questions.
1 If it's a full ROM did you have to convert NAND to EXT4 as well? My understanding was the WHOLE file system on NS was EXT4.
2 If you did have to convert it, have you tried going back to any other "regular" ROM's?
Thanks for the information/clarification. Honestly though, I think it's unfair to single out DG, he's helped alot of people here. If he is wrong he's wrong but no need to hate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Nope, everything is mounted as yaffs2. When you flash the "initial" zip, it creates all the partitions.
2. You can, but you must either use "repartition" in Odin, or use the one click to stock.
And I know, I was just joking about. I can certainly edit that out if it offends him.
ytt3r said:
Thanks for starting a new thread, as you said, clusterf*ck. Out of curiosity, as I'm still syncing repo, did you reorient the kernel yourself or did it come with the repo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I've done is add the headset logic fix, buttons are correctly mapped.
designgears said:
misinformation? They are using supercurios kernel work to boot it.
Do you wonder why SC stopped deving it and is never in the dev channel for HIS kernel anymore?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may be using it, but they've done a ton of work on it. Are you looking at sc's repo, or coolya's? Cause coolya's is the one with CM7.
EDIT: DG, it's not a dual boot. They may be using his kernel as a base, but a lot of the work is from there.
ytt3r said:
Can't we just get over everything and stop with the petty insults... This thread is going downhill already, lets try and keep it clean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
10 chars
https://github.com/coolya/android/commits/master/
There have been no major changes from what sc and coolya did in dec...
---
please move to general, this doesn't need to be in dev.
TheEscapist said:
1. Nope, everything is mounted as yaffs2. When you flash the "initial" zip, it creates all the partitions.
2. You can, but you must either use "repartition" in Odin, or use the one click to stock.
And I know, I was just joking about. I can certainly edit that out if it offends him.
All I've done is add the headset logic fix, buttons are correctly mapped.
They may be using it, but they've done a ton of work on it. Are you looking at sc's repo, or coolya's? Cause coolya's is the one with CM7.
EDIT: DG, it's not a dual boot. They may be using his kernel as a base, but a lot of the work is from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again for the info. I may take a crack at this this weekend.
I've a question..
If the CM/SGSTeam's Source is Open Source.. Why the team will piss off if we compile from it source, and post it?
BTW, it's just a question..
rob989_69 said:
+1
10 chars
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I apologize for the DG jab in the OP. It's removed now.
just got owned, keep reading...
SnakeHaveYou said:
I've a question..
If the CM/SGSTeam's Source is Open Source.. Why the team will piss off if we compile from it source, and post it?
BTW, it's just a question..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because when stuff doesn't work, people ***** at them and they have to fix it, taking time away from deving. That, on top of the captivate not even being an officially supported device.
rob989_69 said:
Thanks again for the info. I may take a crack at this this weekend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck.
designgears said:
https://github.com/coolya/android/commits/master/
There have been no major changes from what sc and coolya did in dec...
---
please move to general, this doesn't need to be in dev.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're looking at the wrong repo. most of the work went into the kernel repo, here --> https://github.com/coolya/android_kernel_samsung
EDIT: Do you honestly think there has been no progress?
SnakeHaveYou said:
I've a question..
If the CM/SGSTeam's Source is Open Source.. Why the team will piss off if we compile from it source, and post it?
BTW, it's just a question..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They probably will get mad. Honestly, even though its open, there are still moral issues. Its basically taking someones hard work and passing it off as your own, because you know that people will credit the one who built it and made it freely available.
TheEscapist said:
You're looking at the wrong repo. most of the work went into the kernel repo, here --> https://github.com/coolya/android_kernel_samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
UGH, why do they keep changing repos...
aright, previous comments about progress retracted...
apologies TheEscapist
SnakeHaveYou said:
I've a question..
If the CM/SGSTeam's Source is Open Source.. Why the team will piss off if we compile from it source, and post it?
BTW, it's just a question..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They wont get mad, cant get made, you are more then welcome to compile and post it.
Would be nice to wait for them to complete it and post themselves...
designgears said:
UGH, why do they keep changing repos...
aright, previous comments about progress retracted...
apologies TheEscapist
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for removing them, but no worries.
The android repo really just points to all the other repos, so CM base stuff, their kernel stuff, etc.
Related
http://www.mediafire.com/?vntzmhnnfym
In case the source is not pushed soon.
Google beat you to it a little over an hour ago.
http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
opcode1300 said:
http://www.mediafire.com/?vntzmhnnfym
In case the source is not pushed soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any particular reason you would upload/post this? Its not like this is hard to get -- just download from google.
I was hoping to save people time. sorry.
opcode1300 said:
I was hoping to save people time. sorry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to be sorry.. thanks. Some people on here have issues and to be honest.. that's no one's fault.
blackvyper said:
No need to be sorry.. thanks. Some people on here have issues ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with that!
opcode1300 - Thanks for trying to help
I agree
guys why the agression on here it never used to exist...
to me i now know its out..
magpie2000k said:
I agree
guys why the agression on here it never used to exist...
to me i now know its out..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its when all these 14 15 and 16 year olds got on here. they start typing and push send before thinking or assessing what people might think of their ignorance. i wish there ere more lurkers it would save time.
magpie2000k said:
I agree
guys why the agression on here it never used to exist...
to me i now know its out..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no aggression here. Your eyes must be screwed in backwards. A question is NOT an accusation.
Please stop. No need for the back and forth.
Thanks for the post, I'm sure there's sombody out there who was unaware of the SDK drop.
So.. sorry for the non-developer question here but.... Now that the SDK is out.. does that mean we will start seeing the devs pushing out 2.2 roms or is there something else that will still need to happen for this to work?
I am no dev but my understanding is that this is just the sdk we need to wait until circa June.
Maybe a dev can be more accurate but I am not sure we have a dump of the Rom yet
frettfreak said:
So.. sorry for the non-developer question here but.... Now that the SDK is out.. does that mean we will start seeing the devs pushing out 2.2 roms or is there something else that will still need to happen for this to work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet. As far as I'm aware, the source code for Froyo has not yet been released to the AOSP git (where we can access the Google-maintained source). Until it is released there, all we can do is play with the SDK and develop Froyo-ready applications.
frettfreak said:
So.. sorry for the non-developer question here but.... Now that the SDK is out.. does that mean we will start seeing the devs pushing out 2.2 roms or is there something else that will still need to happen for this to work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devs could try to use SDK images or device dumps to create roms, but this will be "hacking way" until Google will upload Froyo sources.
Froyo, already has apps2sd integrated. I just wet myself
frettfreak said:
So.. sorry for the non-developer question here but.... Now that the SDK is out.. does that mean we will start seeing the devs pushing out 2.2 roms or is there something else that will still need to happen for this to work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, we wont start seeing ROMs for release on here until some 2.2 sourse is given to the AOSP(android open source project) which will hopefully not be too much longer.i give it end of first week in june.
2.1 has been out for how ever long and they still have not released the correct drivers to us users on G1/MT3G.....(video drivers and such)
I hope they do give the Dev what they need, but why should we expect it when what we still lack on 2.1 has not been released?
I am not even close to being a developer and don't really know what Im talking about, but just my thoughts....
so froyo should work better than eclair on our g1/mt3g's?
Straight from the googleio twitter, retweeted by Cyanogen:
Froyo will be made available to OEMs and the open source community in the coming weeks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we might be getting a D/S Froyo build much sooner than expected.
defconoi said:
so froyo should work better than eclair on our g1/mt3g's?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the rumor.
First you have to flash this zimage
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=357141&d=1278649181
Do this by rebooting your phone into fastboot
adb reboot-bootloader
then,
fastboot flash zimage zImage
then reboot and follow the instructions on this tutorial and it will work like a charm
http://htcevohacks.com/htc-evo-hacks/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-htc-evo-4g/
Thank vinny75 for compiling the zimage that makes this work for the evo
and thank the guy who wrote the tutorial for everything else..
thank me for nothing because i didnt do anything lol
EDIT: EVERYBODY JUST FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS ON THIS LINK
http://htcevohacks.com/htc-evo-hacks/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-htc-evo-4g/
Please, wrong section... I am begging you. The Q&A section is two clicks away.
Ubuntu hasn't been ported to the Evo. It is a highly involved process. You can't expect a ROM for the Nexus One to work on the Evo right? There are drivers to port, kernel modifications to be made. Lots of stuff have to happen first.
The website you pointed to mentions that he is working on a port anyhow. Wait for that to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to leave this here, because mistakes shouldn't be hidden under a rug, but acknowledged and learned from. I am following this thread, and I may give it a try when I am done with my Physics studies this weekend.
Jykinturah said:
Please, wrong section... I am begging you. The Q&A section is two clicks away.
Ubuntu hasn't been ported to the Evo. It is a highly involved process. You can't expect a ROM for the Nexus One to work on the Evo right? There are drivers to port, kernel modifications to be made. Lots of stuff have to happen first.
The website you pointed to mentions that he is working on a port anyhow. Wait for that to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i messaged toast and he told me to put it in the development section
Seems like a development thread to me
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
There is the Linux for android app in the market but it will only work with a loop file system which our kernels don't have or a specially partitioned SD card.
EtherealRemnant said:
There is the Linux for android app in the market but it will only work with a loop file system which our kernels don't have or a specially partitioned SD card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if loop file system is required and loop support isnt compiled into the stock kernel, i haven't checked this, but with the HTC source coded release last week, shouldn't be an issue to compile your own kernel adding in loop support or having a ROM/kernel dev add in loop support.
edit: if i remember right, its a simple option to check under file system in the make kernel config.
Jykinturah said:
Please, wrong section... I am begging you. The Q&A section is two clicks away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is it you repeatedly insist on trolling this "wrong section" bull**** on almost all the threads? It's not your job.
Toast will take care of it. bobdude5 isn't a new member and yet you treat him as such? His question obviously belongs in this section and even when you call him out on it... a Mod has already authorized him to post in section? I bet you feel dumb.
It seems to me, you have no idea where most questions belong, it's probably best you keep your mouth shut and let Toast worry about those who are posting in the wrong section -- it's not even that hard for a Mod to move certain questions to a different section.
Add your input, just don't be a troll.
pseudoremora said:
Why is it you repeatedly insist on trolling this "wrong section" bull**** on almost all the threads? It's not your job.
Toast will take care of it. bobdude5 isn't a new member and yet you treat him as such? His question obviously belongs in this section and even when you call him out on it... a Mod has already authorized him to post in section? I bet you feel dumb.
It seems to me, you have no idea where most questions belong, it's probably best you keep your mouth shut and let Toast worry about those who are posting in the wrong section -- it's not even that hard for a Mod to move certain questions to a different section.
Add your input, just don't be a troll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I feel dumb. And I am also very sorry. I will stop.
Jykinturah said:
Yes, I feel dumb. And I am also very sorry. I will stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's appreciated.
I'd be interested in getting Ubuntu working on the EVO 4G. This is definitely a kick-start kind of thread to get that done, too, and could definitely be a start to a larger project that didn't have much visibility before.
Jykinturah said:
Yes, I feel dumb. And I am also very sorry. I will stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too apologize for my overbearing tone, it's just there are a tun of new people here and then there are veterans -- most of which know the rules by now and understand the ramifications for there actions; don't take it upon yourself to worry about them; that's what the mods are for. Again, sorry.... and thank you.
|Jason8| said:
It's appreciated.
I'd be interested in getting Ubuntu working on the EVO 4G. This is definitely a kick-start kind of thread to get that done, too, and could definitely be a start to a larger project that didn't have much visibility before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might want to check the Nexus One thread, someone has gotten Ubuntu to work on it... the setup might be able to work with the EVO.
Jykinturah said:
Yes, I feel dumb. And I am also very sorry. I will stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off topic ... but very big man/woman of you to admit your wrongdoings and not act like a kid about it. Greatly appreciated
Ok back on topic please.
Also I wanna add its most likely the kernel also. I can compile one for testing tonight if someone doesn't wanna help out and do it first. I think we also need to setup the evo on decordes Linux for HTC devices wiki. I'm at work so searching and linking isn't possible atm. I know he has a section for us there already. We can also gain from the wikis for similar devices there. Anyhow yeah let's not clutter thus thread with trash and let the development begin.
For anyone wanting to see Ubuntu running on the Nexus One and tutorial on how to do it... here's the video.
http://nexusonehacks.net/nexus-one-hacks/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-your-nexus-oneandroid/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, obviously the directions are for the NEXUS ONE... and most likely won't work for the EVO, however this is good starting point to see what steps can be taken from the video and tweaked to make it work with our EVO's.
Good luck.
I am actually working on this
The problem with it is that the Evo 4G kernel needs to be compiled with support for loop devices. All Nexus One ROMs actually support this but Evo 4G doesn't.
The best way would be to ask those guys making the ROMs to compile the support for loop devices for future versions such as OMJ Roms.
Then could just use the same Nexus One script and would work.
In the meanwhile, I am learning to compile the kernel myself but perhaps you guys can ask the others to include support for loop devices on other ROMs.
Just need to enable CONFIG_DEV_BLK_LOOP=y in the kernel config and rebuild.
Seems to be working now, installing LXDE as I type this.
extract the attached zImage then boot into fastboot and "fastboot boot zImage" to test.
EDIT: VNC works.
Why not something more lightweight than ubuntu?
Ubuntu netbook remix might be nice.....
Vinny75 said:
Just need to enable CONFIG_DEV_BLK_LOOP=y in the kernel config and rebuild.
Seems to be working now, installing LXDE as I type this.
extract the attached zImage then boot into fastboot and "fastboot boot zImage" to test.
EDIT: VNC works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup it works! awsome man great job do you mind if i quote your post onto the first post?
bobdude5 said:
yup it works! awsome man great job do you mind if i quote your post onto the first post?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you post the kernel that gets this to work with some instructions on how to install it etc? I am running BBv3 and I would love to have this ubuntu install working!!
WHOOHOO!
Vinny75 said:
Just need to enable CONFIG_DEV_BLK_LOOP=y in the kernel config and rebuild.
Seems to be working now, installing LXDE as I type this.
extract the attached zImage then boot into fastboot and "fastboot boot zImage" to test.
EDIT: VNC works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHOOHOO! Working fine now!
For me, the most stable kernel I have yet used is the kernel by dodgejcr (v1.3), which can be found here Moreover, since I run rooted stock, there were two main issues with the available kernels (though they are all excellent work):
1. "adb remount" will not work,
2. "terminfo" is not set up, so nano text editor will not properly work.
Due to this I made of mod of the kernel which I use, and thought someone else could use this.
From dodgejcr --
The kernel includes:
Overclock to 1.63GHz
--Also added 1.01GHz, 1.20GHz, 1.42GHz
Undervolted
Interactive governor
BFQ Scheduler
Sleepers disabled
Enabled powersave governor
Updated cpu scheduler with 200-line patch
Enabled swap support and init.d scripts (needs testing)
This will install the su binary to /system/bin and /system/xbin/ to provide you root so remove superuser.apk before flashing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My mods to the kernel
1. Edited the default.prop file:
(i) Gives adb root privileges,
(ii) Allows for "adb remount" to work.
2. Added some new global environment variables:
(i) Set up terminfo, so that nano can be run (by typing "nano"),(ii) Changed the terminal prompt to show your current path,(a) Instead of showing /$ regardless of the path, it now shows [email protected]<path_name>/$.
(b) For example, if you are in /system/app, the prompt is [email protected]/system/app/$.
3. Additionally, I added the nano binary, and a full bash terminal to the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instructions
1. Remove superuser.apk from your phone.
2. Flash from recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From dodgejcr --
Cloverdale,
I would like to actually talk you (not thru people that do not know me) about this whole confusion with you using my kernel. I dont mind it one bit. I know my source hasnt been posted yet but in no way is my kernel closed source. I know XDA has some issues with posting a kernel with no source (that is why I personally havent posted it here) but the actual GPL gives me 30days to get it up. Im still working on developing that kernel so I figure I will get some more work done to it before I go posting the source. I am a firm believe in opensource and by me posting it on SDX you are more than welcome to take it and edit my zip for your needs and post it up for others. Proper credit was given and I really never had a problem with it. I like my kernel and its flattering that you do as well. I cant post in development here at XDA as I only have 6 posts or I would explain this to the people on that thread. I think it would be a good idea to quote this PM on the thread so that people will know the facts instead of making assumptions. I will also talk to tamb, I am pretty cool with him so he probably just got a thing or two mixed up. Thank you,
--dodgejcr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SOURCE: https://github.com/dodgejcr
Any special instructions for installing yours? Or flash-away?
bigbad614 said:
Any special instructions for installing yours? Or flash-away?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reminder, I forgot to add instructions. The OP has been edited.
You may want to post your source on this, dodgekernel was posted here at one point, and was pulled due to the source code not being posted.
Joeseph Mother said:
You may want to post your source on this, dodgekernel was posted here at one point, and was pulled due to the source code not being posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean like I already did in the OP?
Edit:I get it now, the actual source code, not the source of the original kernel. Thanks.
so what makes this better than any other kerenel out? maybe not better but what would make wanna use this?
cloverdale said:
Do you mean like I already did in the OP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No... "source" as in source code.
Just flashed this, running good. 1600 was the max my phone could run anyways, and I love having adb working right now. I removed the su stuff before flashing, I rather like the security of the superuser app having to whitelist apps for root access. Also removed the bash part, as I already had bash on my phone setup and didn't want to bother with redoing it all... lol It is really nice for some scripts and the like to actually work without editing when they ask for userid to be root, what with the passwd and group file being added too. I'll keep using it and see how it goes, but so far so good. Thank you!
Also, does this default to the deadline scheduler? I noticed that's what I'm on, but I didn't know if it defaulted that way or my settings stuck.
danaff37 said:
Just flashed this, running good. 1600 was the max my phone could run anyways, and I love having adb working right now. I removed the su stuff before flashing, I rather like the security of the superuser app having to whitelist apps for root access. Also removed the bash part, as I already had bash on my phone setup and didn't want to bother with redoing it all... lol It is really nice for some scripts and the like to actually work without editing when they ask for userid to be root, what with the passwd and group file being added too. I'll keep using it and see how it goes, but so far so good. Thank you!
Also, does this default to the deadline scheduler? I noticed that's what I'm on, but I didn't know if it defaulted that way or my settings stuck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should default to it.
Joeseph Mother said:
You may want to post your source on this, dodgekernel was posted here at one point, and was pulled due to the source code not being posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
x99percent said:
No... "source" as in source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot find it posted, but I sent dodgejcr an email requesting it. Hopefully I will have it up by the end of the day.
The point is it wasn't yours to post, which is why you don't have the source code. Which in a way brings me to my next question: does this terminal modification rely on dodgejcr's kernel in order to work, or would it work with any Sense kernel? Why wasn't this posted on it's own?
I'm about 99% sure, and I could be wrong, that dodgejcr did not approve of you taking this kernel and listing it under "cloverdale's development mod". Dodgejcr already added init.d support, so you didn't add anything to his kernel. I'm guessing, again, could be wrong, you couldn't figure out edify scripting so you placed your files inside an update zip that worked that included dodgejcr's kernel. Why didn't you create your own kernel to avoid this entire issue? I would love to see dodgejcr's kernel at xda, but this is entirely the wrong way to achieve that. Could a mod please suspend or lock this thread til these issues can be resolved?
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
tambourineman86 said:
The point is it wasn't yours to post, which is why you don't have the source code. Which in a way brings me to my next question: does this terminal modification rely on dodgejcr's kernel in order to work, or would it work with any Sense kernel? Why wasn't this posted on it's own?
I'm about 99% sure, and I could be wrong, that dodgejcr did not approve of you taking this kernel and listing it under "cloverdale's development mod". Dodgejcr already added init.d support, so you didn't add anything to his kernel. I'm guessing, again, could be wrong, you couldn't figure out edify scripting so you placed your files inside an update zip that worked that included dodgejcr's kernel. Why didn't you create your own kernel to avoid this entire issue? I would love to see dodgejcr's kernel at xda, but this is entirely the wrong way to achieve that. Could a mod please suspend or lock this thread til these issues can be resolved?
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Removed due to no need for drama.
cloverdale said:
I liked his work, all I did was unpack it, make some edits, and repack. I gave him full credit for the kernel. All I was trying to do was add some features that others may like, not take credit for someone elses work.
This does not require his kernel, I could do this to any kernel. His is just very stable, which is why I used it. One must unpack a kernel, edit and repackaged, so I do not understand what is meant by posting on its own.
If you actually read the OP you would see what was added to it. I gave adb root privileges, so remount would work, and I added global environment variables. So yes, you are guessing, and you are wrong.
I have no problem with creating my own, just no time. Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am guessing, but you have no real profession, and consider playing forum mod to be you gift to the world.
Don't worry about a mod doing it, I will take it down. It is pathetic assholes such as yourself that make me hate XDA. Piss off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
cloverdale said:
I liked his work, all I did was unpack it, make some edits, and repack. I gave him full credit for the kernel. All I was trying to do was add some features that others may like, not take credit for someone elses work.
This does not require his kernel, I could do this to any kernel. His is just very stable, which is why I used it. One must unpack a kernel, edit and repackaged, so I do not understand what is meant by posting on its own.
If you actually read the OP you would see what was added to it. I gave adb root privileges, so remount would work, and I added global environment variables. So yes, you are guessing, and you are wrong.
I have no problem with creating my own, just no time. Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am guessing, but you have no real profession, and consider playing forum mod to be you gift to the world.
Don't worry about a mod doing it, I will take it down. It is pathetic assholes such as yourself that make me hate XDA. Piss off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't let them get to you like that. There are people like that all over any forum. And no mod would shut a thread down immediately without giving an opportunity to fix it. And you gave credit where it was needed, and didn't claim anything was yours that wasn't, so I don't know that anything would warrant any such action here. I've seen that you have contributed a few things here, far more than that guy. Don't letsomeone like that chase you off.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
danaff37 said:
You can't let them get to you like that. There are people like that all over any forum. And no mod would shut a thread down immediately without giving an opportunity to fix it. And you gave credit where it was needed, and didn't claim anything was yours that wasn't, so I don't know that anything would warrant any such action here. I've seen that you have contributed a few things here, far more than that guy. Don't letsomeone like that chase you off.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
tambourineman86 said:
The point is it wasn't yours to post, which is why you don't have the source code. Which in a way brings me to my next question: does this terminal.....
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cloverdale said:
I liked his work, all I did was unpack it, make some edits, and repack. I gave him full credit for the kernel. All I was trying to do was add some features that others may like, not take credit for someone elses work.
This does not require his kernel, I could do this to any kernel. His is just very stable, which is why I used it. One must unpack a kernel, edit and repackaged, so I do not understand what is meant by posting on its own.
If you actually read the OP you would see what was added to it. I gave adb root privileges, so remount would work, and I added global environment variables. So yes, you are guessing, and you are wrong.
I have no problem with creating my own, just no time. Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am guessing, but you have no real profession, and consider playing forum mod to be you gift to the world.
Don't worry about a mod doing it, I will take it down. It is pathetic assholes such as yourself that make me hate XDA. Piss off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JKILO said:
+1
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
danaff37 said:
You can't let them get to you like that. There are people like that all over any forum. And no mod would shut a thread down immediately without giving an opportunity to fix it. And you gave credit where it was needed, and didn't claim anything was yours that wasn't, so I don't know that anything would warrant any such action here. I've seen that you have contributed a few things here, far more than that guy. Don't letsomeone like that chase you off.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JKILO said:
+2
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ignore the troll tambourineman...just kidding...
He can't help himself, no where does the OP not credit the appropriate people
Cloverdale - just ignore this guy, he's a buddy of dodgejcr and shouldn't be concerned with what you're posting if dodgejcr isn't concerned.
Impailer - is something missing from this thread or not?
The reason that the Dodge kernel was taken down in the first place is that there was no source code posted. Since this is the same kernel and there is still no source code posted (none posted at SDX, either), it's just a matter of time before the mods will take it down.
Cliff's Notes: GPL
I am going to redo this with an open source kernel and repost in a few days (when I have time again). Thanks for the support.
I was trying to warn you so that you wouldn't have to go through the same frustration that I did.
Local mod sent a PM mid-day on Friday (I didn't get an e-mail notification... is that XDA default?) that said I had 48 hours to post source in my thread. 36-37 hours later, my thread was locked in the middle of the night. Talk about annoying.
cloverdale said:
I am going to redo this with an open source kernel and repost in a few days (when I have time again). Thanks for the support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey thanks for sticking around!
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
This time, I must really thank RandomBlame for setting aside the problem between me and him, and now allowing me to port things faster. Without a doubt, Thank him and me TOGETHER! PA1.9.7 will be up in an hour's time. So give me some time to work on it
COPIED FROM OLD THREAD
This is a port from the MyTouch 4G/Desire S forums so there may be several bugs included :/
This port can be done thanks to cnote74(Port/Kernel), 0.0(Port) , RandomBlame(BASE), hdorius(Support till the end ), blindndumb(Guidance) , ...Awesome...(AwesomeBeatsv3) and PA/CM10.
Changelogs for v1.9.7 : http://www.blindndumb.com/2012/08/rom-aug-08-paranoidandroid-v197a.html [all give a thanks to blindndumb/cnote74 too ]
ParanoidAndroid:
Flashing Instructions
1. Make Sure You're On The Latest CWM Or 4EXT Recovery
2. Make A Backup
3. Full wipe
4. Flash ROM ×http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?49v6oil31aqy25t×<-V1.9.2
xhttp://paranoidandroid-ace.googlecode.com/files/PARANOIDANDROID_ACE_v1.9.5.zipx [direct download link] <-1.9.5b
(Somehow I gotten 3 upload links while focusing on one o.o ) <- All 3 are 1.9.7 Links removed. Too much error.
Haven't test it yet so might as well upload first then edit.
5. Flash Gapps ×http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20120726-signed.zipx If it doesn't work try going to http://www.blindndumb.com/p/paranoid...downloads.html and download the paranoidandroid jellybean gapps. [ Thanks blindndumb =) ]
6. Reboot and Enjoy
New update will be up in around 5-10hours time. Have school work to do before i start updating :/
PA v1.9.7 Bugs: Can't mount SDCard to computer. Trying to find an alternative way.Links Going up in 1/2 hour's time.
CM10:
Flashing Instructions
1. Make Sure You're On The Latest CWM Or 4EXT Recovery
2. Make A Backup
3. Full wipe
4. Flash ROM ×http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?vhm9l0sjn92bt74×
5. Flash Gapps ×http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20120726-signed.zipx
6. Reboot and Enjoy
BUGS :
Backlight problems/ Screen-off illumination problems.
Apps force closes/causing hot reboots
If there is any bugs please leave me a logcat through pm or if you know specifically whats the problem leave me a pm too
Sorry guys, due to phone breaking down and exams coming up, I will not have the time to do all this till my exams are over. At the moment darkunesu will take over all the work.
totally agree with u , ANDROID IS AN OPEN SOURCE OS,
any way thnx for your great job
Good to see you got it all up and running. Ill give it a shot again... Hope it all works out in the end mate.
Xda is filling up with those types of personalities.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Pfaffinator said:
Xda is filling up with those types of personalities.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree.
miffymiffy said:
Good to see you got it all up and running. Ill give it a shot again... Hope it all works out in the end mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And if he closes it down again I'll just fight my way through by porting all sorts of CM10 over
Clearly you are still confused between 'open source' & 'openly kang' .
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
lululala said:
Clearly you are still confused between 'open source' & 'openly kang' .
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what it means so you don't need to teach me about it. But android is open source hence should be shared among everybody.
So... anyone tested it yet? able to boot?
simahu said:
I know what it means so you don't need to teach me about it. But android is open source hence should be shared among everybody.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Randomblame's kernel source code is freely available for you to download and build. There's nothing more 'open source' than that. Extracting a compiled kernel from someone's ROM without permission and put it into your own ROM is clearly not.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
nice work will try,Thanks
lululala said:
Randomblame's kernel source code is freely available for you to download and build. There's nothing more 'open source' than that. Extracting a compiled kernel from someone's ROM without permission and put it into your own ROM is clearly not.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but I took it without permission as I did not know how to compile a kernel. Now that someone is helping me out then I will not touch his anymore. Will do my own cm10 port about a few days time.
What up with the link; I have to sign up for mediafire now??
I think you should remove mentions of the other dev in your OP.
simahu said:
I know but I took it without permission as I did not know how to compile a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're missing the whole point of what asking permission in this scenario is all about.
iggdawg said:
I think you're missing the whole point of what asking permission in this scenario is all about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did ask him in the first place but he totally disagree with it. What's wrong with using a ROM in the first place when it is meant to be shared among other peoples? Why are people getting selfish nowadays? Even if he spent 100 over hours with that ROM, whats wrong sharing a kernel? Not like he bought the whole CM10 down, so it should be shared among people.
RoxRedEye said:
What up with the link; I have to sign up for mediafire now??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've accidentally added a X in it hence the link is not working. Try it now.
gtalum said:
I think you should remove mentions of the other dev in your OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? They helped me out in the first place. So I should thank them by putting their names in the thread.
simahu said:
Why? They helped me out in the first place. So I should thank them by putting their names in the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm only thinking of one of the dev's in particular, not mentioned as thanks. I'm guessing he won't want to be associated with your ROM.
Friendly advice, take it or leave it.
simahu said:
I did ask him in the first place but he totally disagree with it. What's wrong with using a ROM in the first place when it is meant to be shared among other peoples? Why are people getting selfish nowadays? Even if he spent 100 over hours with that ROM, whats wrong sharing a kernel? Not like he bought the whole CM10 down, so it should be shared among people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you went and did it anyways, why did you ask in the first place?
It is being shared. You can get the source. If you don't know how to compile it, you should learn. Not steal. Instead you're getting upset at him not doing the work for you. kind of not cool. If you really want to push out your own ROMs so bad, learn how to do the legwork in the first place.
iggdawg said:
If you went and did it anyways, why did you ask in the first place?
It is being shared. You can get the source. If you don't know how to compile it, you should learn. Not steal. Instead you're getting upset at him not doing the work for you. kind of not cool. If you really want to push out your own ROMs so bad, learn how to do the legwork in the first place.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think it is very easy to do compiling of stuffs when you have a computer which has only 512mb of ram, not even reaching 1ghz single core, show me that you can do it. And if you think it is very easy everything from the basics, go try it yourself. If you can't even produce a ROM, don't come teach me what to do. I was rushing my work to show to everybody that the v1.9.2a update would work perfectly but indeed I had broken the rules by taking RandomBlame's kernel without permission. Till then if you can't produce a ROM, do not teach me what to do. I managed to get this phone , which was already like 2 years old from my family, and my whole family is not that rich. We can't even afford a 'normal' PC like most people had nowadays, and had to live our lives with mostly second hand stuffs. When I got this phone, I was totally shocked how the HTC Sense made the phone laggy for me, hence I went into modding my phone, trying to build Chinese Custom ROMs into this development forum, and seeing people able to appreciate my work makes me happy. Now my family is even having difficulties saving money up for my school fees that I have to pay.
So if your life is not like mine DO NOT TALK LIKE YOU ARE THE BOSS OF THE FORUM. -End Of Speech-
Can someone or has this been ported to the s3 yet? It would be pretty amazing.. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=27873486
I would, but i haven't the slightest idea how to
Neverendingxsin said:
I would, but i haven't the slightest idea how to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From my understanding, you have to swap out the patches and it's specific to your device and ROM. I took a look at one of the patcher tools, but it was just a bunch of confusion to me until I can actually sit down and take a look without having to rush. Think you could take a look as well? Greatly appreciated :victory:
STVERDI said:
From my understanding, you have to swap out the patches and it's specific to your device and ROM. I took a look at one of the patcher tools, but it was just a bunch of confusion to me until I can actually sit down and take a look without having to rush. Think you could take a look as well? Greatly appreciated :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ill take a look my issue is that for weeks now my laptop has been pissy and won't run java correctly >.<
Alright looks like im gonna need to get an extra desktop PC setup and running ubuntu definitely won't be happening tonight. Sadly my laptop just can't handle this stuff anymore.
Neverendingxsin said:
Yeah ill take a look my issue is that for weeks now my laptop has been pissy and won't run java correctly >.<
Alright looks like im gonna need to get an extra desktop PC setup and running ubuntu definitely won't be happening tonight. Sadly my laptop just can't handle this stuff anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, let me know if you figure anything out when you get everything up and running. I'm definitely going to be sitting down tonight and looking into it, I'll report back if I find anything!
I just found this quote in the post; "For all who keep on asking your answers can be found in this thread just search. To use the patch you need your rom's source code then run the patch command on linux and patch your source add the resources and compile. There is no flash zip morphs or anything flash able because AOSP roms are not the same it will be hard to make a flash able zip for all and this is the development section if you don't know what to do then search, read and read some more instead of these consider requests that wouldn't happen. You have to do see stuff yourself something" ... so my question now is, where is the source code for LS RC5(seeing that you run it as well).
STVERDI said:
Well, let me know if you figure anything out when you get everything up and running. I'm definitely going to be sitting down tonight and looking into it, I'll report back if I find anything!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully i can get one setup this weekend, gotta convince my dad to let me setup everything on one of his desktop computers. I'd rather mess around with it using Ubuntu and not windows, but that's just personal preference
STVERDI said:
I just found this quote in the post; "For all who keep on asking your answers can be found in this thread just search. To use the patch you need your rom's source code then run the patch command on linux and patch your source add the resources and compile. There is no flash zip morphs or anything flash able because AOSP roms are not the same it will be hard to make a flash able zip for all and this is the development section if you don't know what to do then search, read and read some more instead of these consider requests that wouldn't happen. You have to do see stuff yourself something" ... so my question now is, where is the source code for LS RC5(seeing that you run it as well).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LS RC5 is based off of CM10, so it would be the cyanogen mod 10 source code, which is android 4.1.2 source
Neverendingxsin said:
Hopefully i can get one setup this weekend, gotta convince my dad to let me setup everything on one of his desktop computers. I'd rather mess around with it using Ubuntu and not windows, but that's just personal preference
LS RC5 is based off of CM10, so it would be the cyanogen mod 10 source code, which is android 4.1.2 source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you possibly give me a link on where to find that?
STVERDI said:
Could you possibly give me a link on where to find that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This tutorial should help
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1762641