Related
I've been trying out all the captivate roms in the past few weeks. And all of them seem to have their quirks. I'm hoping that with all this 2.3 developing going on, captivate development will go in a new direction. Especially looking at battery life.
Every rom I've tried has battery life problems. probably due to overclocked kernels designed for a totally different phone. Assonance seemed to have the longest life for awhile but it seemed to get worse over time.
I've never had GPS problems. I've walked around my yard a few times and it follows me around to a tee. The lagfix did seem to do the trick.
And the backlight notification is a cool feature, but I can't seem to get it to turn off, even after I disabled it from clock work recovery.
I'm not trying to rag on anyone here, I'm just trying to say that now that development for our amazing phone is being given a break with official source code from the nexus hopefully features and roms won't to be for other phones that just happen to work on the captivate. I understand that these new things will be based on the nexus s, but is imagine that with the firmware leak from samsung, a real captivate version could be made some where down the line.
Thank you, and I wish you the best in development.
Battery life, along with many of the items you listed, is relative. I for example get amazing battery life with many of the roms I have used, much better than stock. I am using the OC/UV kernels too without any undervolt. I am not saying the problems dont exist, but that I dont expect the issues that others are having to be fixed because of the Nexus material flying around. Mileage just varies by make and model. I am actually not sure what my point is, but then again, I am not sure what the point to your post is either haha. No offense.
I understand what you are trying to say.
To summarize "stop putting i9000/Vibrant ROMs and re-orient kernels on Captivates and calling it a Captivate ROM".
If we lived in a perfect world where a certain manufacturer would release source code instead of breaking GPL licensing rules...it maybe easier. But for the time being...we still are going to be the bastardized cousins of the great, almighty i9000.
So...if you want to do something about it...call Samsung . The devs are working with the tools they have...even if that means they have to borrow from the neighbors .
Thanks
-h8
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Please explain what this has to do with development? Be happy these guys are doing things to make the phone better than stock 2.1.
This is my captivate. There are many like it buy this one is mine.
Ryukeima said:
Battery life, along with many of the items you listed, is relative. I for example get amazing battery life with many of the roms I have used, much better than stock...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some users have done tests, it shows that the stock jh7 has a lot better battery life then all of the custom ROM's mostly in part that the ROM's were made for different devices... just sayin...I don't mean to bicker, but golly has Samsung been... lazy? I don't even know what to call it. The Captivate hasn't got a good leak in sometime. but Samsung could at least be more specific with their ETA on Foyo being out.. I understand AT&T has a thing to do with it but still...
flashman2002 said:
Please explain what this has to do with development? Be happy these guys are doing things to make the phone better than stock 2.1.
This is my captivate. There are many like it buy this one is mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I rather would like to see people stop posting non development related threads on the Development forum....
shaolin95 said:
+1
I rather would like to see people stop posting non development related threads on the Development forum....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this non development due to the fact that there is not a rom to download? I've read through thousands of posts on the Captivate Android Development section of the forum and I really don't see the difference so why are picking on this thread in particular? Your post has absolutely nothing to do with development ....
h8rift said:
I understand what you are trying to say.
To summarize "stop putting i9000/Vibrant ROMs and re-orient kernels on Captivates and calling it a Captivate ROM".
If we lived in a perfect world where a certain manufacturer would release source code instead of breaking GPL licensing rules...it maybe easier. But for the time being...we still are going to be the bastardized cousins of the great, almighty i9000.
So...if you want to do something about it...call Samsung . The devs are working with the tools they have...even if that means they have to borrow from the neighbors .
Thanks
-h8
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.2 for that captivate hasnt been officially released, so they don't have to release the source until then.
ritchmonty said:
Is this non development due to the fact that there is not a rom to download? I've read through thousands of posts on the Captivate Android Development section of the forum and I really don't see the difference so why are picking on this thread in particular? Your post has absolutely nothing to do with development ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First learn what development means so you can understand the point.
Second, just because you have seen thousands (hyperbole much?) of non development threads does not mean they were posted in the right place....the MODs can barely keep up with people that cannot read or lack reading comprehension.
Thirds, my post has nothing to do with development? Was that a joke...am I supposed to turn a non development thread into one?
In summation: more pewpew, less QQ.
I don't notice much difference in battery life between using Captivate ROMs and reoriented i9000 ROMs. I get great battery life with both (usually about 40 hours with moderate use). Maybe you're seeing poor battery life because most ROMs posted for the Captivate use Setiron's kernel, which is overclocked and has all sorts of other tweaks built in. Lagfixes don't help either. If you want decent battery life with an i9000 ROM, try xcaliburinhand's no voodoo kernel (JPU and JPX ROMs don't need a lagfix) or disable overclocking, lagfix, and tweaks on Setiron's kernel.
40 hours doesn't even seem possible unless u put your phone down and don't touch it.....I have used vibrant and i9000 roms and noticed since switching back to cronus (jj4) and voodoo stable (jj4) which are all captivate parts that my battery life has almost doubled. Im going to stick with this setup for awhile and see what happens.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I wasn't trying to to start no fight here! Like I said I wasn't trying to call anyone out, but yes I probably did post in the wrong forum. I had chosen Development, because that was what my post was aimed at.
I appreciate the work being done one the Captivate, because without it our phones would be pretty boring don't ya think?
Really, all I'm trying to say is that I hope we see some new kinds of ROMs in the upcoming future. Something similar to Ultimate Droid would be crazy, with all of it's extra phone settings.
Smallsmx3 said:
40 hours doesn't even seem possible unless u put your phone down and don't touch it.....I have used vibrant and i9000 roms and noticed since switching back to cronus (jj4) and voodoo stable (jj4) which are all captivate parts that my battery life has almost doubled. Im going to stick with this setup for awhile and see what happens.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can go a lot longer than 40 hours if I put it down and don't touch it... 70+ hours. With really heavy use (couple hours of tethering, a little gaming, couple hours of browsing and reading xda, lots of texts and gtalk, couple calls, hour or so of music listening, random time and email checking) I can only go about 14-16 hours, but it's still enough for a full day.
h8rift said:
I understand what you are trying to say.
To summarize "stop putting i9000/Vibrant ROMs and re-orient kernels on Captivates and calling it a Captivate ROM".
If we lived in a perfect world where a certain manufacturer would release source code instead of breaking GPL licensing rules...it maybe easier. But for the time being...we still are going to be the bastardized cousins of the great, almighty i9000.
So...if you want to do something about it...call Samsung . The devs are working with the tools they have...even if that means they have to borrow from the neighbors .
Thanks
-h8
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Captivate source has been released.
Source for what?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
MikeyMike01 said:
In summation: more pewpew, less QQ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol +1 10 Char
Hey Guys,
I am new here so please forgive any embarressing newness moments regarding my questions.
I noticed that GTab has at least 4 different Roms that are being actively developed in their own way (big thank you to the devs btw).
I also see there is a post already asking which rom people this is the best.
I dont know if its fair on the devs to say best or not but I was wondering if each rom was developed for a certain purpose in mind?
I mean is one built for better gaming while the other is for better web browsing etc??
Can anyone pls advise suitability of purpose?
I get my GTab soon as i just ordered it and will be changing the rom on it almost immediately. I'm just unsure which on to choose is all.
~BAM~ said:
Hey Guys,
I am new here so please forgive any embarressing newness moments regarding my questions.
I noticed that GTab has at least 4 different Roms that are being actively developed in their own way (big thank you to the devs btw).
I also see there is a post already asking which rom people this is the best.
I dont know if its fair on the devs to say best or not but I was wondering if each rom was developed for a certain purpose in mind?
I mean is one built for better gaming while the other is for better web browsing etc??
Can anyone pls advise suitability of purpose?
I get my GTab soon as i just ordered it and will be changing the rom on it almost immediately. I'm just unsure which on to choose is all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is not that much difference between the roms. They are based from different source so they all look a little different. The best thing to do is install clockwork and check them all out and see what is best for you. Install one and run it for awhile then make a backup in clockwork and install another. If you don't like it you can then restore your backup and be back up in about 5 minutes.
I would personally wait on cm7 before installing as it has some weird quirks the others don't. I have nothing against cyanogenmod as I am running cm7 on my droid right now.
~BAM~ said:
Hey Guys,
I am new here so please forgive any embarressing newness moments regarding my questions.
I noticed that GTab has at least 4 different Roms that are being actively developed in their own way (big thank you to the devs btw).
I also see there is a post already asking which rom people this is the best.
I dont know if its fair on the devs to say best or not but I was wondering if each rom was developed for a certain purpose in mind?
I mean is one built for better gaming while the other is for better web browsing etc??
Can anyone pls advise suitability of purpose?
I get my GTab soon as i just ordered it and will be changing the rom on it almost immediately. I'm just unsure which on to choose is all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of them is really better at any one thing than the other. It is mostly just user interface differences. TnT Lite is based off of the stock TnT that came on the tablet. Zpad is based off of the rom made for the Zpad. vegaN is based from the rom for the Advent Vega, and Cyanogenmod is based off of... Well, Cyanogenmod.
The GTab, and the Zpad are like brothers. Both made by Malata, and are almost the same thing. The Advent Vega uses similar hardware to us as well.
My personal favorite is vegaN but really only because I don't like the upper notification bar in TnT. Zpad is another one I like for the same reason.
For just starting out I would go with either TnTLite, or vegaN as they are the most popular, and most supported.
Can't really go wrong with any of them and I play with them all. Like said before I would stay away from the Cyanogenmod rom unless you are a techie. It works well, but it has a different way of mapping memory and some other differences that can get you into trouble.
Easiest to get answers to questions are TnTLite, or vegaN...
Thanks for the quick response guys!
I cant wait till my Gtab arrives!
is there a way to overclock the asus transformer? because ive been reading about the xoom/gtablet/sgt's overclocking capabilities, but still havent read anything about the transformer being overclocked
We need an overclocking kernal for that, since we don't have full access to everything we cant overclock. (yet!) I expect we should be able to overclock to 1.5 easily.
any update on OC? We already have the source code for TF.
Haven't seen anything about it either. I Would like to know though!
awitee said:
is there a way to overclock the asus transformer? because ive been reading about the xoom/gtablet/sgt's overclocking capabilities, but still havent read anything about the transformer being overclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once a custom kernal is released that allows us to overclock it will be all over the blogs, I would assume. So i would imagine that it isnt too far away based on all the publicity the dev would receive.
The full kernel source has been released and can be modded now. I know some people are working on it already. I dont think it would be too hard to incorporate thexoom's ocing into the transformer. After all the transformer code is what helped the kernel dev for the xoom activate the sd card
graffixnyc said:
The full kernel source has been released and can be modded now. I know some people are working on it already. I dont think it would be too hard to incorporate thexoom's ocing into the transformer. After all the transformer code is what helped the kernel dev for the xoom activate the sd card
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So an unlocked bootloader is not required for overclocking? I didn't think I'd miss the OC from the XOOM but when I just played Avatar at 1280x728 HD the XOOM was much smoother than the TF Also, the sound on the TF stopped whereas the XOOM kept going. I assume it had to do with the massive amount of data from the softdecode... So PLEASE make the OC happen
Is there any update on progress for overclocking? This would definitely be something to look forward to since we have stock android already, and because we have the honeycomb source won't be released till December.
So it looks like kernel work could be a big priority till then since there isn't much else till then.
Thunderbolt Rooted!
BUMP!
C'mon guys, there must be someone on this forum that knows how to modify the Tiamat kernels for the XOOM so make it work on the TF I really didn't think that the TF would be receiving sooo little development despite its apparently good sales!
People are only just now starting to receive them. Give people time.. Not everyone is a developer.
i know for a FACT that there are dev's working on this. The number one rule of dev forums is, well, dont talk about fightclub. But the number 2 rule is don't ask for ETA's. These guys do this for free, and if i remember correctly, I'm not even sure the dev working on these has a tf yet.
djdevine2 said:
We need an overclocking kernal for that, since we don't have full access to everything we cant overclock. (yet!) I expect we should be able to overclock to 1.5 easily.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might overclock it but I do not believe there is a heatsink on the cpu.
dcmtnbkr said:
i know for a FACT that there are dev's working on this. The number one rule of dev forums is, well, dont talk about fightclub. But the number 2 rule is don't ask for ETA's. These guys do this for free, and if i remember correctly, I'm not even sure the dev working on these has a tf yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not asking for an ETA and I appreciate people working on it in silence. But it would be nice to at least know that something's going on After all, that kind of development is the best reason to donate beer money just like I did for the great guys at the XOOM forum
levenite said:
You might overclock it but I do not believe there is a heatsink on the cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there one on the xoom? Does the reference Tegra2 design include a heat sink?
funnycreature said:
I'm not asking for an ETA and I appreciate people working on it in silence. But it would be nice to at least know that something's going on After all, that kind of development is the best reason to donate beer money just like I did for the great guys at the XOOM forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries I believe it is being done in secret in case nothing comes of it. I wouldnt be surprised to see something in the next couple of weeks though.
seeingwhite said:
Is there one on the xoom? Does the reference Tegra2 design include a heat sink?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might be that the metal casing of the XOOM helps disperse the produced heat. The TF has plastic backing so it might not work as efficiently
Overclock available
Netarchy is working on the Netformer kernel. Thread is here in the development.
Mine seems to run fine at 1.4GHz! Netformer kernel as the previous poster already mentioned!
Thanks!
verkion
verkion said:
Mine seems to run fine at 1.4GHz! Netformer kernel as the previous poster already mentioned!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And mine too.
Results @1400Mhz
Mandro Bench: 15217
Quadrant Standard: 3447
Linpack: 57.236
I know, I know, this sounds like a typical newbie opinion question. But I'm not exactly looking for opinion here. I'm looking for FACTS pertaining to which ROM is going to give me the most optimized performance (un-altered benchmarks or whatever) while still giving me the most functionality(I.E. all aspects of device performing as well or better than stock). I got this device a little over a week ago, and really like it. I have been reading thread after thread and just want some help, so please don't think I'm just looking for a quick un-researched answer. I am looking for legitimate advice. I am currently running VOODOO kernal and oc'd to 1.2 ghz and getting benchmarks around 1650 ish? i believe. I do like TW, but dont swear by it. I tried MIUI, and i cant really stand it. CM doesn't want to flash right either, and i don't know which direction i want to go. I also feel this thread might help others in my position. Does PnP offer noticeable performance increases, aside from removed bloat? Thanks in advance for any advice provided!
Heintz 57 is the best, most stable and functional. Everything works. PnP is a very close second and everything works as well. I say try em all. I have and keep finding myself back on H57. It's really a matter of seeing which one best fits YOUR needs and style.
SRGaudio said:
I know, I know, this sounds like a typical newbie opinion question. But I'm not exactly looking for opinion here. I'm looking for FACTS pertaining to which ROM is going to give me the most optimized performance (un-altered benchmarks or whatever) while still giving me the most functionality(I.E. all aspects of device performing as well or better than stock). I got this device a little over a week ago, and really like it. I have been reading thread after thread and just want some help, so please don't think I'm just looking for a quick un-researched answer. I am looking for legitimate advice. I am currently running VOODOO kernal and oc'd to 1.2 ghz and getting benchmarks around 1650 ish? i believe. I do like TW, but dont swear by it. I tried MIUI, and i cant really stand it. CM doesn't want to flash right either, and i don't know which direction i want to go. I also feel this thread might help others in my position. Does PnP offer noticeable performance increases, aside from removed bloat? Thanks in advance for any advice provided!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer miui, hands down, and i've tried them all. Miui + glitches kernel, i can get over 3k quad scores. Not to mention, its super cusomizable--super easy to change themes (no need to flash). Not to mention, it's updated weekly by a great team of developers so it's constantly improving.
kallell said:
I prefer miui, hands down, and i've tried them all. Miui + glitches kernel, i can get over 3k quad scores. Not to mention, its super cusomizable--super easy to change themes (no need to flash). Not to mention, it's updated weekly by a great team of developers so it's constantly improving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running the same MIUI and Glitch and it is impressive, smooth, very customizable ect. For pure performance I found JT's Vanilla GB V6 with either his new kernel V3 or Glitch Kernel to be the fastest performer. Any of the MTD based ROMs seem to perform better and I won't go back myself.
miui ftw.
Sent from my MIUI SCH-i500
Any mtd rom but my favorite is miui
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Miui is sex. Somebody used to put a lot of hard work into porting it for us, hmm perhaps he's off developing elsewhere.
I heard there is a good trigger rom around somewhere. I forget who the dev was but he used to be here. He was AWESOME! But they kicked him out for some reason
I honestly like the MIUI rom. Everything looks and works amazingly. Only one bug atm, no MMS while you are on Wifi. So.. all you do is just disable it and then get your MMS's, and then go back on. It works.
ricky54326 said:
I honestly like the MIUI rom. Everything looks and works amazingly. Only one bug atm, no MMS while you are on Wifi. So.. all you do is just disable it and then get your MMS's, and then go back on. It works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mms has never worked on wifi got any rom, even stock.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
CM7 is my favorite. It's well thought out by the original developers, looks great, runs good, and will run 3x the benchmark your friends still on stock will! That being said, it's still under development, and will sometimes do some strange things. For example, I woke up one morning to find my screen was on with colors inverted. Had to pull the battery to unfreeze it.
So, for stable ROM, I like H57. It's not as new and sleek, but it's stable and works perfectly!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Dbanyai8 said:
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said.
add144 said:
Well said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give him credit, it's one of the smartest posts all day.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
You guys crack me up...
kallell said:
I prefer miui, hands down, and i've tried them all. Miui + glitches kernel, i can get over 3k quad scores. Not to mention, its super cusomizable--super easy to change themes (no need to flash). Not to mention, it's updated weekly by a great team of developers so it's constantly improving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone post links to the MIUI thread, and links to glitches kernel? I'm running pick-n-pack and ready to try something new. I want to make sure I grab the right files and get this going but I am having a hard time finding the right things. I just need someone that can confirm what the latest files are so i grab the right stuff. I guess I am looking for MIUI and Glitches Kernel. I should be able to figure out how to root, red recovery and use odin out as I've done all of those before.
Thanks.
alaindesjardins said:
Can someone post links to the MIUI thread, and links to glitches kernel? I'm running pick-n-pack and ready to try something new. I want to make sure I grab the right files and get this going but I am having a hard time finding the right things. I just need someone that can confirm what the latest files are so i grab the right stuff. I guess I am looking for MIUI and Glitches Kernel. I should be able to figure out how to root, red recovery and use odin out as I've done all of those before.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would stick with the bundled JT's kernel for the moment. Right now if you flash the latest MIUI then the Glitch kernel, you'll lose all sensors. It sounds like they should have the problem fixed soon, though.
Thanks for the quick reply. Are the links in your sig where I can watch for this to make sure I can do this when it's fixed?
You wont find the latest MIUI releases on here anymore. [mod edit: you know the rules....]
I can't seem to find the latest stable build for Heinz, can anyone link?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Now that HTC has dropped source, I'm wondering if anyone has plans for new kernels? I'd like to have proper sliders for overclocking at the least (though I'm grateful for all the hard work around the stock kernels).
If not, I'll see if I can get info from team BAMF and see what I can build because that's been my preferred ROM for a few weeks (running 1.03 right now). I haven't built anything for the public since the ZeusDroid project (OG Droid) though so I have to start from scratch (build environment and all).
The poll is to help me get an idea of much interest there is in such a project so I know whether I should expect to put much time into it.
There are 4 new kernels out for 3.5 roms since the source came out. And you should not have post this in development section this in a Q and A. If you can't find the kernels you are not as smart as you think you are. I will give you and Easter egg hunt if you go to your favorite Rom site you will find one of them made just for your favorite Rom.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Grnlanturn. Do not insult rainabba. He is very knowledable. I remember the zeusdroid days. But I too am confused by the slider request. But there are a few good kernels can't name them since I run cm7 on my tbolt.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Ok I won't be one to scare off a potential developer but there are in fact 4 kernels out for 3.5 roms ziggy, imo, jdk, adr. Another will be out when lou drops his. I say if you can make one, make one even in your spare time, it may blow all of them away.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
il say it.... go away
i may be wrong her but i dont think the kernels are "sense" based. they are based off of Android. so this post makes no sense...
andersonrt said:
i may be wrong her but i dont think the kernels are "sense" based. they are based off of Android. so this post makes no sense...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was this a joke? There ARE in fact sense based kernels... Hence the importance of HTC dropping its kernel source for sense based ROMs. Also the fact that an AOSP kernel does not work on a sense ROM and vice versa.......................
lol^....I am running BAMF SOAB, and it runs great stock...but the battery life was horrible and there was no overclocking, so I flashed the new imo kernel and its just as fast and way better on battery life...but I was wondering has anyone tried all of the other kernels with SOAB or another sense 3.5 rom?
I am looking for battery life..i was getting 6 hours with synergy with moderate use and now i am getting 8 hours with SOAB and the new imo kernel..if anyone has any suggestions on kernels let me know
musicfreak190 said:
I am looking for battery life..i was getting 6 hours with synergy with moderate use and now i am getting 8 hours with SOAB and the new imo kernel..if anyone has any suggestions on kernels let me know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm at 40% after 12 hours off the charger with mild-moderate use and at least half the day I've been running this kernel (thanks to someone considerate enough to PM me a link instead of wasting posts here trolling) at 1.7GHz with the SmartAss2 governor. I'm not sure if I'm sold on this kernel yet (though it definitely is a nice base so either way, credit to jdkoreclipse).
For at least the last 4 days (and the first half of today), I've been running this kernel at 1.5GHz with the Demand governor and loving it. AMAZINGLY smooth and battery life has been as good as any ROM/Kernel combo I've used on my TBolt to date (12-16 hours with moderate use and lots of time on 4G/no wifi).
I love how this forum has a bunch of asenine "know-it-alls" that pretend to know what they're talking about (btw, this is not in reference to the original poster, but rather the jack asses that are posting replies in this thread).
If you don't have anything productive to add, then why are you here? I don't pretend to know a whole lot about developing, and in short, my contributions to the android community are minimal, at best. But I do contribute when I can, and if there's something I am not sure of, I don't spout off what I "THINK" I know, simply to make myself look like an idiot in front of those who do...
Well done, folks. Well done. I guess this is what everybody is talking about in other Android forums about the idiots on XDA.
playpolo4life said:
Was this a joke? There ARE in fact sense based kernels... Hence the importance of HTC dropping its kernel source for sense based ROMs. Also the fact that an AOSP kernel does not work on a sense ROM and vice versa.......................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, yes they can.
There is no Sense kernel. There is no AOSP kernel. Changes are mostly in the initramfs. AOSP usually requires a few extra changes as well, but a Sense kernel as you call it CAN boot AOSP. It may not be perfect, and some things may be broken, but most functionality is there. AOSP kernel as you call it may work on Sense based roms. It depends on how close the source is to the original source HTC supplied or worked with.
Note I said kernel. Not initramfs+kernel, aka boot.img.
Boostjunky said:
I love how this forum has a bunch of asenine "know-it-alls" that pretend to know what they're talking about (btw, this is not in reference to the original poster, but rather the jack asses that are posting replies in this thread).
If you don't have anything productive to add, then why are you here? I don't pretend to know a whole lot about developing, and in short, my contributions to the android community are minimal, at best. But I do contribute when I can, and if there's something I am not sure of, I don't spout off what I "THINK" I know, simply to make myself look like an idiot in front of those who do...
Well done, folks. Well done. I guess this is what everybody is talking about in other Android forums about the idiots on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you sir just proved your own point.
theoneownz said:
And you sir just proved your own point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You, sir, are correct. And unfortunately I realized it only after submitting my post. Too late to take it back, now. Guess I just needed to get something off my chest, though.
What I don't understand is why people have to attack potential developers on a personal level, I guess. Granted, the o.p. could have posted in a better suited forum, but why make it personal by practically calling him stupid in a round about way?
Sorry for posting at all. I'm sure it's all falling on deaf ears for the most part, anyway.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Boost:
There is some history here that isn't apparent.
adrynalyne said:
Boost:
There is some history here that isn't apparent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Understood.
I apologize if any of my posts were offensive to any of the amazing devs that help to support this forum.
Adrynalyne, I appreciate your work and everything you've done to make our devices what they are today.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App