Read about another Android update for Q4 2010
Going to be called Gingerbread - don't know what it is with all these sweet names for Android updates? The one before Froyo was called Eclair.
Exciting though, seems Android are really pushing at the moment
Yep, Android is moving at a very fast advanced pace
Adobe today started shipping Flash 10.1 for Mobile. The initial release is targeted at devices running Android 2.2 and, initially, will only work with the Nexus One. However, it did inadvertently confirm a number of Android 2.2 upgrades for a handful of other devices that would let them run Flash, including the Dell Streak, Motorola's Droid and Milestone, HTC's Desire, Droid Incredible and Evo 4G, and the Samsung Galaxy S.
For more of this story, visit:
http://ongoingissues.wordpress.com/2010/06/22/adobe-posts-flash-10-for-android-leaks-android-2-2-upgrades/
Hiya! Me and my HTC Desire are looking forward for the lovely Froyo!
Shouldn't be long before the Nexus gets the official FroYo OTA Can't wait
C'mon Google...I know you do can do better than Apple or Microsoft. Need to improve this update thing now that Android is gaining momentum to mainstream market. Things like this will lose users to go back to other OS especially where security and latest update is needed.
iOS 4 has 90 percent share amongst iOS device owners. What about Android 2.3? 0.4 percent, as of a couple weeks ago. Yes, that’s zero point four percent.
Okay, I realize it’s a little unfair to compare iOS 4 to Android 2.3 since the latter was just released and is only available on one phone (again, the Nexus S). Still, the fact that it’s still only available on one phone weeks after being made public says a lot.
But for the sake of this being slightly more fair, let’s compare iOS 4 to Android 2.2 — an OS which came out well before iOS 4. The adoption rate there? 51.8 percent. That’s still pretty pathetic.
Obviously, this isn’t the Android users’ faults. The problem is that the OEMs and carriers are holding these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bull****. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but Samsung doesn’t want to push it out so that they can entice people to buy the newly announced Vibrant 4G+ instead.
Lovely.
Instead, many Samsung T-mobile Android users are struck with Android 2.1. An OS that while perhaps only a year old, is now two full revisions old in Android land. A dinosaur, in other words. And they’re hardly alone. Some 35.2 percent of all Android users are stuck on this same version of the OS.
Imagine if 35 percent of all iOS users were stuck on iOS 2 (which is so old that it wasn’t even called ‘iOS” at the time), while a few of us had iOS 4 and the majority of us had iOS 3? Yeah…
Even more humorous is the fact that over 12 percent of Android users are still stuck on Android 1.5 and 1.6. I mean, Android 1.5 is nearly two years old now. And again, more importantly, it’s four major revisions ago. iOS hasn’t even gone through four major revisions yet.
So it’s sort of like if a few iPhone users had iOS 4, the majority had iOS 3, a good number had iOS 2, some had iOS 1, and then nearly 5 percent were stuck using MotoROKRs.
Google, meanwhile, keeps promising that this sad trend is going to improve. They’re sure that the carriers are eventually going to see the light and get in line any day now. Those 99.6 percent of Android users who’ve seen Android 2.3 — but can’t use it — are waiting awfully patiently.
Meanwhile, the iPhone will launch on its second U.S. carrier in less than a month. And it will launch with either iOS 4.2.5 or iOS 4.3. The same OS that every single other iOS user will have access to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source: http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/17/ios-android-breakdown/
From the replies on that article:
Android users on Android 2.0, 2.1, 2.2: 87%.
iOS users on iOS 4.0, 4.1, 4.2: 89.75%.
What's the percent of people upgrading to Windows 7?
Hell, I'm still on XP and like it.
Even more humorous is the fact that over 12 percent of Android users are still stuck on Android 1.5 and 1.6. I mean, Android 1.5 is nearly two years old now. And again, more importantly, it’s four major revisions ago. iOS hasn’t even gone through four major revisions yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm.. yeah.
It's easy to update at a snail's pace.
I guess Android is updated so often that it's hard to keep up sometimes.
There's 3 kind's of lies.
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics.
That article sure has alot of statistics.
dekeijzer said:
From the replies on that article:
Android users on Android 2.0, 2.1, 2.2: 87%.
iOS users on iOS 4.0, 4.1, 4.2: 89.75%.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw that. But this "the above ones are probably best to compare with Android revisions because .X updates in iOS tend to be pretty minor (bug fixes), while .X in Android are usually pretty major (new features)." He is trying to say .x in iOS is not same as .x in android and that the 89% of iOS is not the same as the 87% of Android users
zeppelinrox said:
What's the percent of people upgrading to Windows 7?
Hell, I'm still on XP and like it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In windows world, I guess it's like 7 vs 7 with service packs. For XP, XP & SP1, XP & SP2, and XP & SP3. I guess iOS 4.x, or Android 2.x is equivalent to 7 and 7.x or XP and XP.x. XP to Windows 7 is not the same and too different. XP is not the oldest, Windows 1.01 is the oldest OS of "Windows" iOS 3.x to 4.x is not that different. Windows 1.x to 7 is drastically different...probably 99% differnt even the HAL are different already.
Even if Android did not get only a yearly update I wouldn´t go to apple
Said that it would be great to have more frequent updates indeed.
orb3000 said:
Even if Android did not get only a yearly update I wouldn´t go to apple
Said that it would be great to have more frequent updates indeed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android might lose battle to iphone in the long run to business community if they don't clean this up. Business and Enterprise mobile deployer likes me like to be up-to-date on patches and security...not behind. Android currently lacks enterprise control like mass group policy stuff. I already worked with Windows, Apple, and Blackbery, but wanted to try something new thus giving android a try, but if they don't have anything for enterprise deployment or control like group policy and stuff later, then folks like me or enterprise admin, would be force going back to BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, iphone or whatever that can be managed remotely.
Well iPhone certainly is not going to be any better in enterprise management than Android. But you are correct that if Google doesn't give up it's insistence on cloud based data the corporate managers will go back to Blackberry. (WinP7) does not seem very business friendly either but I do predict MS will one day release a pro edition that will please those needs.
Android has great potential in this area thanks to linux base but I just spent two days trying to get my partner's contacts sorted out between all the cloud based contacr contributors.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using XDA App
Asphyx said:
Well iPhone certainly is not going to be any better in enterprise management than Android. But you are correct that if Google doesn't give up it's insistence on cloud based data the corporate managers will go back to Blackberry. (WinP7) does not seem very business friendly either but I do predict MS will one day release a pro edition that will please those needs.
Android has great potential in this area thanks to linux base but I just spent two days trying to get my partner's contacts sorted out between all the cloud based contacr contributors.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't cloud computing supposed to be easier? lol
I'm on Android 2.2 on my HTC Wildfire.
Its full of annoying little bugs and lags. Feels like Beta software still.
Can't imagine how horrendous 1.5 and 1.6 was if 2 years down the line the OS is still full of annoying glitches.
Been a Google fan all my life but Apple is starting to look appealing...
Google is not responsible for updating all of the Android phones out there.
Google updates a few phones themselves, the Nexus series, the g1, the g2, and the Mytouch 3g. The actual updates to phones say the Evo, the Galaxy S, the Droid/Milestone, that's up to HTC, Samsung, and Motorola. Apple makes the device, and the operating system, and is not open source like Android. They have 2 series of phones they support still, and 2 they don't. This article is full of crap.
kobesabi said:
C'mon Google...I know you do can do better than Apple or Microsoft. Need to improve this update thing now that Android is gaining momentum to mainstream market. Things like this will lose users to go back to other OS especially where security and latest update is needed.
source: http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/17/ios-android-breakdown/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know maybe.. just maybe if you read this article on a website like BGR or Engadget, you might have caught the fact that only .4% are on Gingerbread is due to the fact that only the Nexus S ships with Gingerbread. So wow, I wonder why Apple's percentage is so huge and Android's is so small!!11!!!1!
Maybe we (Android users) happy with not latest OS version?
I flashed Froyo 2.2 half year ago and don't seek for newer version.
This statistic only says how developer can push newest OS.
Samsung Captivate Android OS 2.2 Upgrade Released Then Quickly Pulled
By Ed Hardy, Brighthand.com Editor | 2/17/2011
Send Mail Comments Print Bookmark and Share
The long-awaited upgrade to Android OS 2.2 (Froyo) for AT&T's Samsung Captivate was released today... only to be quickly withdrawn.
Currently, it's not clear if this system software upgrade was released by mistake, or if a bug was found in it almost immediately.
This is just another blow to users of the Captivate, which was released last summer with Android OS 2.1, even though the latest version of Google's mobile operating system at that time was already OS 2.2.
Although Samsung has committed to releasing an upgrade for this model, and at one point said this would be available by the end of November, users of this smartphone are still waiting.
Since then, Google has introduced Android OS 2.3, which is currently available only on the Samsung Nexus S.
New in Android OS 2.2 (Froyo)
Android OS 2.2 is required for devices to run Adobe Flash Player 10.1, which allows the web browser to fully make use of websites that use Flash for navigation, games, and showing video.
This version of Google's operating system also contains a number of other enhancements, such as faster performance thanks to a new JIT compiler and the ability to store applications on a removable memory card.
In addition, Samsung has promised that this system software upgrade will include a fix for a bug that sometimes causes these smartphones to be unable to get a GPS lock.
source: brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=17530&news=Samsung+Captivate+Google+Android+OS+2.2+Froyo+Upgrade
Also, see:
gizmocrunch.com/android/5414-samsung-captivate-froyo-update
This news is days old and there have been at least 5 threads about this already...mods please close this.
/flameon
something pretty significant has happened (release of froyo source for both epic and vibrant). Both were released pretty quietly and have started seeing some reports of the epics push starting the 21st.
I don't think it will be long before we see the source released for the captivate.
Its kind of weird for me personally...
Do I really care about the official Froyo 2.2? Not really...
Do I want AT&T/Samsung to release it? If they promised it, they should...
I only want to see it release to know that a major company kept their word. Plus, if it helps the devs here release other ROMs based on a true US Cappy build, then I'm all for it.
I'd like to see it released, but I'm not so sure that I'll be rushing back to stock so I can update to it.
And the story is wrong. Froyo was never released... no one downloaded it.
The only thing that was released was some instructional pages.
Posting a story that is wrong is even worse then posting rumors.
I'm new to AT&T and the Samsung Smart Phone world so I thought I would share this and see what the community has to say. From my experience with Sprint and HTC I noticed that receiving new Android updates was like waiting for hair to grow. Granted some grow faster than others, it is still time consuming. With my HTC Hero back in the day... I NEVER received an update. With the EVO3D I saw ONE update. With the HTC EVO LTE... I didn't have the phone long enough to care. Feel free to add your experiences and theory on how long it'll take our S4's to snatch the newest update of 5.0 or, at the very least, 4.3.
---------------
Source
---------------
Android 5.0 Key Lime Pie is expected to be released in October 2013 and reports say that the upcoming software version will support older and low-cost devices to prevent fragmentation between Android smartphones and tablets.
Android 5.0 Key Lime Pie and K Release Build
WallStreetJournal reported the Google's upcoming plans include a "K release" in fall as the company "wraps up development on the next version of Android." "K release" refers the famous Android 5.0 aka Key Lime Pie which will refresh the Android OS environment. Recently, Google released the source code of Android 4.3 Jelly Bean featuring major bugs fixes and some additions not found in previous Jelly Bean versions.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 Google Play Edition and Snapdragon-powered variant were found compatible with Android 4.3 and will be available soon to other flagship devices such as HTC One and Sony Xperia Z in 2013. Moreover, Nexus devices, including Nexus 7 and Nexus 4 could receive push update of Android 4.3 once Google officially releases it publicly. The iteration of Android devices are now being finalised by Google.
Older and Low-Cost Devices will be Made Compatible with Android 5.0
Included in the report released by WallStreetJournal, Android 5.0 will be made customised to suit low-cost smartphones and not exclusive anymore to high-end devices. Google has been making a lot of noise to bring affordable Internet connection to billions that currently do not support proper Web connectivity.
This may also mean that older phones released 2-3 years ago will become qualified to run Android 5.0 Key Lime Pie. It will incredibly increase popularity and market share of Android devices if the major software update has a tailor-made version for low-end smartphones and tablets.
Android 5.0 Opens Door for Expansion
Google is thinking to expand again and plans to target other electronic devices such as appliances and computers; making the Android OS limitless.
"With the next release of Android this fall, Google is also moving more aggressively to use the software in additional kinds of devices, including laptops and appliances such as refrigerators," included to the report of WallStreetJournal.
"According to Google, the majority of Android devices currently being used rely on a version of the software released in 2011 that has fewer capabilities than newer releases. Some industry experts say that the most recent versions of Android are better for higher-end devices than lower-end or older one that had, for instance, 512MB of memory."
The only way to solve this crisis about compatibility and stability among Android devices is to come up with an Android OS version optimised to all kinds, whether high-end or low-end.
The Android 5.0 Key Lime Pie major feature would be the "optimised factor" not found on earlier versions of the OS, and its release, according to Google, would be a "remedy to the issue of RAM restrictions for older devices and freedom of developers to optimise their apps for all Android devices no matter what version it runs."
Delakit said:
The Android 5.0 Key Lime Pie major feature would be the "optimised factor" not found on earlier versions of the OS, and its release, according to Google, would be a "remedy to the issue of RAM restrictions for older devices and freedom of developers to optimise their apps for all Android devices no matter what version it runs."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is great, I know a bunch of guys with smartphones from 2010-2011. Those phones aren't really good with RAM management given the low amount of RAM they work with. Mostly 512mb. We'll have to see what carriers will do about updating these old phones. It would be really nice if they did get the update. And as for us with the higher end devices, It'll mean a snappier, smarter and better multitasking OS. :good:
OverHertz said:
This is great, I know a bunch of guys with smartphones from 2010-2011. Those phones aren't really good with RAM management given the low amount of RAM they work with. Mostly 512mb. We'll have to see what carriers will do about updating these old phones. It would be really nice if they did get the update. And as for us with the higher end devices, It'll mean a snappier, smarter and better multitasking OS. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this reminds me off that Google article were they promised to support device for at least 2 years(I think)to help with fragmentation and that never happened. I tend to believe the industry not really interested in keeping devices software current because so many of us buy the new phones to get the new software.
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda premium