Related
it's possible turn off my PPC HTC touch2 every day at the same time?
Read this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=357287 with various apps and do's & dont's
i don't find the application?
xdaswitchoff ok shut down ppc manually...
In the thread there is a reference to apps called OS profiler, G-profile, CommmanagerPro ......they can shut down your phone....but not turn-off completely.
XDA-shutdown can do this .......but manually.....
Not sure if you want that......
Frank Caarls said:
In the thread there is a reference to apps called OS profiler, G-profile, CommmanagerPro ......they can shut down your phone....but not turn-off completely.
XDA-shutdown can do this .......but manually.....
Not sure if you want that......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i want shutdown the PPC not manually but in automatic at 22:00 for example.
You can try with one of the programs mentioned above, associated with a mortscript that emulate the keypress or tap needed: than you have to put the script in a notification activated when you need.
glaucos said:
You can try with one of the programs mentioned above, associated with a mortscript that emulate the keypress or tap needed: than you have to put the script in a notification activated when you need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks but for me it is too difficult!
abarth83 said:
thanks but for me it is too difficult!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are able to install mortscript and associate a script to a notification (thing that I cannot made for you "online"), tell me what program you would use, and I can write the script for you.
glaucos said:
If you are able to install mortscript and associate a script to a notification (thing that I cannot made for you "online"), tell me what program you would use, and I can write the script for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tanks for shutdown PPC use xdaShutdown v1.01 QVGA
abarth83 said:
tanks for shutdown PPC use xdaShutdown v1.01 QVGA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking at the xdashutdown thread I see that you can call it with parameters, so you don't need the script mentioned above!
Simply create a link to xdaShutdown /shutdown, and assign it to a notification (I use memmaid to do this for other purpose)
glaucos said:
Looking at the xdashutdown thread I see that you can call it with parameters, so you don't need the script mentioned above!
Simply create a link to xdaShutdown /shutdown, and assign it to a notification (I use memmaid to do this for other purpose)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DinarSoft Memmaid is ok?
how can I assign a notification?
abarth83 said:
DinarSoft Memmaid is ok?
how can I assign a notification?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm looking in memmaid yes, dinarsoft), but I can't find how to create a notification for all the day... maybe I remember wrong...
But there is another solution, (maybe better) that I've used in the past: RunEveryday
It's very simple, absolutely NOT graphically nice, but perfect for your needs.
glaucos said:
I'm looking in memmaid yes, dinarsoft), but I can't find how to create a notification for all the day... maybe I remember wrong...
But there is another solution, (maybe better) that I've used in the past: RunEveryday
It's very simple, absolutely NOT graphically nice, but perfect for your needs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok in the command line insert:
Program installation folder\xdaShutdown.exe /shutdown ok?
try tomorrow
abarth83 said:
ok in the command line insert:
Program installation folder\xdaShutdown.exe /shutdown ok?
try tomorrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's right!
I've found a new way to BLOCK ANY permission for android applications! Successfully tested denial on few different kind of permissions!
It's a great news for me, and prossibly to any of you too.
The application will be completely native except user interaction part (GUI), so lightning fast, and will have access virtually to any permission granted by apk itself. There will be much logic included to ease of use for unexperienced users, but also the advanced mode which will reveal all the system level functions/data. Advanced iptables control will probably be included also at the later development stages.
Any developer experienced with NDK + SDK is kindly asked to contact me.
PS. This thread WILL be the thread for the application itself. I expect to make first alpha's in two months or earlier.
Reserved for future use
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
ukanth said:
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. So let it stay at pm as you already started . We'll move here depending on the case .
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
frsp2 said:
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot check this on every app available (for obvious reasons), but I suppose most of them will work. We'll see after first alpha, I'll check it on my own app set which is rather big (the main reason LBE and PDroid buth fails - too much CPU overhead).
UPDATE: Removing unreliable info. Shame on me for reposting smth before fact checking.
Privacy Blocker is the app with patching apk method, not the Stericson' one.
frsp2 said:
I've read somewhere on local forum that com.stericson.permissions application just changes manifest and reinstall apk with patched one.
This info is not mine so I can't prove or disclaim it at this time.
Can you confirm that info is correct and your method is totally different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, neither the app you describe, neither mine will not change anything in apk. I think it was just a rumour.
Could you please comment on this app too
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.xeudoxus.privacy.blocker&hl=en
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/xeudoxus/131027-support-privacy-blocker.html
It indicates baksmali usage btw.
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
frsp2 said:
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
frsp2 said:
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Yeah.
"Ever wondered why??"
Nice chat guys, but first of all, I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate, and second, there are two threads about LBE wher even I said my opinion about it, so please, go there and read .
krzych said:
I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am asking because of the same software niche not because of the same principle of operation. If your application solves the same task/problem with less overhead - that's good. We'll see.
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
frsp2 said:
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
krzych said:
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
frsp2 said:
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not. I know it's a good thing, but it has it's flaws too. We'll see later.
Alpha ready? Me want asap! I love pdroid, would love another way to secure myself even more
as above - for example, some apps only allow auto-update every 12 hours. what i want to achieve is - to have all my news feeds/emails/evernote synced and updated before I leave house in the morning (so we can tap on the WIFI instead of 4G). is there an app I could use to achieve that?
Thanks!
dylansmith said:
as above - for example, some apps only allow auto-update every 12 hours. what i want to achieve is - to have all my news feeds/emails/evernote synced and updated before I leave house in the morning (so we can tap on the WIFI instead of 4G). is there an app I could use to achieve that?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simplify your Question Bro..
jime1 said:
Simplify your Question Bro..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Example:
Pulse App
App only allows 12 hourly auto-update over WIFI
what I need : auto-update at fixed timings - e.g. every 7am and 10pm.
what i need #2 : do this for every app (e.g. Evernote/feedly/Gcal/facebook/flipboard)
dylansmith said:
Example:
Pulse App
App only allows 12 hourly auto-update over WIFI
what I need : auto-update at fixed timings - e.g. every 7am and 10pm.
what i need #2 : do this for every app (e.g. Evernote/feedly/Gcal/facebook/flipboard)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great idea bro..i don't know about such app but if you know android development then you should definitely create one by Yourself:good::highfive:
jime1 said:
great idea bro..i don't know about such app but if you know android development then you should definitely create one by Yourself:good::highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have 0 coding knowledge and was just wondering if someone already thought of the same thing and have an app ready for it..
dylansmith said:
i have 0 coding knowledge and was just wondering if someone already thought of the same thing and have an app ready for it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your desire is very specific so difficult to find.. but you can find it on google if you keep trying:good:
jime1 said:
your desire is very specific so difficult to find.. but you can find it on google if you keep trying:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
already did, would appreciate if anyone found anything similar..
thanks!
What is the most relevant app for scheduling messages you know? I used to use Scheduler, but it is not working as good as it was. I'm looking for something with active developing and nice UI.
mp3root said:
What is the most relevant app for scheduling messages you know? I used to use Scheduler, but it is not working as good as it was. I'm looking for something with active developing and nice UI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try SMS Scheduler
AzrulHisyam said:
Try SMS Scheduler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one? There's at least couple of apps under such name.
mp3root said:
Which one? There's at least couple of apps under such name.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just Sms scheduler
Here the link
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lylynx.smsscheduler
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
Code:
echo "800000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_period_us
echo "62" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.shares
echo "700000" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.rt_period_us
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
Download an APK from the attachment.
Governor tuner is broken on this build, so don't report it.
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
testing right now, i'll be back with report next morning.
Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any command to check it, I wanna compare it with my device's default, if u don't mind 9f course?
Dims_Camper said:
testing right now, i'll be back with report next morning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, waiting.
zputnyq said:
Any command to check it, I wanna compare it with my device's default, if u don't mind 9f course?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, it'll give less time for root cGroup and a bit more for background one. I also provided some docs in first post, so you can read what they affect.
Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
Code:
echo "800000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_period_us
echo "62" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.shares
echo "700000" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.rt_period_us
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did read the docs, but can you dumb this down as to what this will do?
Thanks
martyfender said:
I did read the docs, but can you dumb this down as to what this will do?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, why not.
If you check
Code:
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
you can see PIDs (process IDs) of all the task which device started.
Parameters from above controls how much time can one of the tasks from the list access to the CPU resources. In our case it's 0.8s out of every 1s, and for backround its 0.7s out of every 1s.
Got it?
We can also increase it too for future testing.
Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dan, my device has different path for "bg_non_interactive"
When I tried the command u gave, my terminal said tmp-mksh blablabla(I forgot).
My path for it, is here
"dev/cpuctl/apps/bg_non_interactive"
Should I add the path?
Paget96 said:
Sure, why not.
If you check
Code:
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
you can see PIDs (process IDs) of all the task which device started.
Parameters from above controls how much time can one of the tasks from the list access to the CPU resources. In our case it's 0.8s out of every 1s, and for backround its 0.7s out of every 1s.
Got it?
We can also increase it too for future testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not quite. Is this to reduce the overall cpu load, where certain tasks could hog the cpu? In effect, improving performance and battery life? Will you be releasing alphas to test? Do you want our device defaults are?
Thanks
so this is my battery stats since i was running the script, the screen-on-time sux (yea i know, maybe this is due kernel that i flashed lol) standby time is just like before which is great. i noticed no lag, and maybe this phone is processing task little faster so it cost my screen-on-time?
martyfender said:
Not quite. Is this to reduce the overall cpu load, where certain tasks could hog the cpu? In effect, improving performance and battery life? Will you be releasing alphas to test? Do you want our device defaults are?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll release a test version when new GovTuner implementation will be done, so it's probably today
Dims_Camper said:
so this is my battery stats since i was running the script, the screen-on-time sux (yea i know, maybe this is due kernel that i flashed lol) standby time is just like before which is great. i noticed no lag, and maybe this phone is processing task little faster so it cost my screen-on-time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SO you have experienced a little bit faster task processing?
If you feel so that SOT is not impacted then it's ok
zputnyq said:
Dan, my device has different path for "bg_non_interactive"
When I tried the command u gave, my terminal said tmp-mksh blablabla(I forgot).
My path for it, is here
"dev/cpuctl/apps/bg_non_interactive"
Should I add the path?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for letting me know
We'll get some improvements.
One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem
Paget96 said:
I'll release a test version when new GovTuner implementation will be done, so it's probably today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So will this feature included in GovTuner option? Because at the moment I'm using governor profiles (specific for my device) and I'd like to continue using them because they're really well tuned. Could I suggest you to divide GovTuner feature and this feature?
Sent from my bullhead using XDA Labs
zputnyq said:
One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome
Now waiting for battery life reporting
edoardotavecchio said:
So will this feature included in GovTuner option? Because at the moment I'm using governor profiles (specific for my device) and I'd like to continue using them because they're really well tuned. Could I suggest you to divide GovTuner feature and this feature?
Yes it's separated. This is CPU Optimizer update
Sent from my bullhead using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...
The battery life hasn't changed to me, and i have nothing to complain about, but the UX has increased a lot, and thats why its amazing.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk
zputnyq said:
One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
ADM.GL said:
...
The battery life hasn't changed to me, and i have nothing to complain about, but the UX has increased a lot, and thats why its amazing.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good ^^
kchaisu said:
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You also have battery problem?
Apk uploaded.
Check first post
ADM.GL said:
...
The battery life hasn't changed to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After updated, now I see.
Infinity SOT?
Cool.
It is draining only half than usual. UX remains insane. It was a super double level up.
A very good UX and* an excellent Battery life.
On the way to perfection.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk
Added support for all possible cGroups, first post updated with new APK.
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks guys
I've got write deferral instead of cgroup when I download apk. Any possible reason?
Sent from my Samsung GT-I9300 using XDA Labs