I've found a new way to BLOCK ANY permission for android applications! Successfully tested denial on few different kind of permissions!
It's a great news for me, and prossibly to any of you too.
The application will be completely native except user interaction part (GUI), so lightning fast, and will have access virtually to any permission granted by apk itself. There will be much logic included to ease of use for unexperienced users, but also the advanced mode which will reveal all the system level functions/data. Advanced iptables control will probably be included also at the later development stages.
Any developer experienced with NDK + SDK is kindly asked to contact me.
PS. This thread WILL be the thread for the application itself. I expect to make first alpha's in two months or earlier.
Reserved for future use
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
ukanth said:
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. So let it stay at pm as you already started . We'll move here depending on the case .
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
frsp2 said:
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot check this on every app available (for obvious reasons), but I suppose most of them will work. We'll see after first alpha, I'll check it on my own app set which is rather big (the main reason LBE and PDroid buth fails - too much CPU overhead).
UPDATE: Removing unreliable info. Shame on me for reposting smth before fact checking.
Privacy Blocker is the app with patching apk method, not the Stericson' one.
frsp2 said:
I've read somewhere on local forum that com.stericson.permissions application just changes manifest and reinstall apk with patched one.
This info is not mine so I can't prove or disclaim it at this time.
Can you confirm that info is correct and your method is totally different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, neither the app you describe, neither mine will not change anything in apk. I think it was just a rumour.
Could you please comment on this app too
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.xeudoxus.privacy.blocker&hl=en
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/xeudoxus/131027-support-privacy-blocker.html
It indicates baksmali usage btw.
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
frsp2 said:
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
frsp2 said:
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Yeah.
"Ever wondered why??"
Nice chat guys, but first of all, I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate, and second, there are two threads about LBE wher even I said my opinion about it, so please, go there and read .
krzych said:
I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am asking because of the same software niche not because of the same principle of operation. If your application solves the same task/problem with less overhead - that's good. We'll see.
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
frsp2 said:
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
krzych said:
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
frsp2 said:
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not. I know it's a good thing, but it has it's flaws too. We'll see later.
Alpha ready? Me want asap! I love pdroid, would love another way to secure myself even more
Related
Hello,
I just patched pdroid2.0 into CyanogenMod 10 via ApG, everything went fine.
How do I configure PDroiD in a sensible way? I do want some apps (especially some system apps) not to be able to read contacts, call log etc.
Do I have to pick every app (93 of them after a "vanilla" install) and check/uncheck permissions by hand? Is there a way to have PDroiD show which apps want to access the call list and deactivate them with a single click? LBE Privacy Guard has this nice feature, and I would love to use it - if there is - with PDroiD.
Thank you and have a nice day!
Same question
Raubsau said:
Hello,
I just patched pdroid2.0 into CyanogenMod 10 via ApG, everything went fine.
How do I configure PDroiD in a sensible way? I do want some apps (especially some system apps) not to be able to read contacts, call log etc.
Do I have to pick every app (93 of them after a "vanilla" install) and check/uncheck permissions by hand? Is there a way to have PDroiD show which apps want to access the call list and deactivate them with a single click? LBE Privacy Guard has this nice feature, and I would love to use it - if there is - with PDroiD.
Thank you and have a nice day!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you, that it is not selfexplainable. As it seems we are both thinking that the configuration needs some more explanation or a template or something like that. But other than agreeing I unfortunately cannot help you because I have the same questions as you do ... :angel:
schitthoch2 said:
I agree with you, that it is not selfexplainable. As it seems we are both thinking that the configuration needs some more explanation or a template or something like that. But other than agreeing I unfortunately cannot help you because I have the same questions as you do ... :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I'm going to install PDroid2 too.
Apparently, there is a batch mod to apply some configurations to a set of apps verifying some rules.
I think it's a little like titanium backup
yuuzhantar said:
Apparently, there is a batch mod to apply some configurations to a set of apps verifying some rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey. Where can in find the 'Batch mode'?
AW: [APP][PDroiD2] Configuration
OK i found it, but then it still needs explanation...
There has been a lot of discussion about this topic and opinions. But lets be clear about a few things that are facts:
KingRoot now installs a ton of Adware on your device
KingRoot takes over your lock screen now and splatters ads on it
KingRoot's Uninstall does NOT remove everything they have modified on your device
SuperSU replace method does NOT remove everything they put on it either
KingRoot intentionally ads multiple binary files to your /system/bin folder that have nothing to do with their rooting method and are even back dating them to try and hide them
AVG has reported this and even warns of possible personal information gathering, that is NOT just a warning of rooting exploits
KingRoot has now included a Wifi option within their latest version under tools, what do you think they are gathering there ?
I have been trying to tell users for a long time that they are up to no good and they have even lied saying they tried to contact me to work with me on what they refer to as my app doing a malicious removal of their tool. That is completely incorrect... They have NEVER tried to contact me about this. They did try and ask my to stop and I told them once they allowed SupeSU to cleanly take over their root and they allowed all traces of their program to be replaced/removed I would then do it, but they never have adhered to any of that.
You the user have been warned and my conscious has been cleared. Install this at your own risk. They even went as far as trying to prevent my program from gaining root, why ? Because it will in fact remove all traces of their program including their custom binaries they have added, etc.. Now, keep in mind, they have many binaries that they add, depending on the device, but I do my best to catch them.
KingRoot, you want all of this to stop ? Then comply with the request of all the users and myself to remove EVERY file modification you have made to their device and allow replacement of your tools with whatever the user desires, cleanly.. You want to make it a paid app for you to get compensation for your time ? Fine, but get rid of all this Adware and malicious take over you have done to their device.
Let all the people speak now. It is your device and your choice of what you want to see, I am just one voice of many...
Respectfully submitted,
Gatesjunior (One of the people in the community)
Reference:
AVG:
http://www.avgthreatlabs.com/us-en/virus-and-malware-information/info/android-kingroot/
http://www.avgthreatlabs.com/us-en/android-app-reports/app/com.kingroot.kinguser/
http://www.avgthreatlabs.com/us-en/android-app-reports/app/com.kingstudio.purify
Finger printing the device:
Has the ability to get the wifi MAC address (may be used to fingerprint device)
Has the ability to read the device ID (e.g. IMEI or ESN)
Location Services (Where have you been ?):
Permission request for "android.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION"
Permission request for "android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION"
Camera (Can I see what your doing ?):
Permission request for "android.permission.CAMERA
Super-Sume Pro: https://forum.xda-developers.com/general/paid-software/supersu-please-t3110954
(Sony devices, or at least the majority, you are in a bad spot, because you are rooted, but try and mount your /system into (r/w) mode... Probably not going to happen unless you load a kernel module to allow this. Otherwise you are in a write-protected mode and can only factory restore your device to get rid of it.)
Tiny screen made me click the wrong poll answer. ><
Thanks for the info
SynisterWolf said:
Tiny screen made me click the wrong poll answer. ><
Thanks for the info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL...I can move your vote but not your name....done.
I recently upgraded my old s4 for hangouts only use (no carrier) to 501 and I used an old version of Kingroot and current SuperSUme. No worries. Thanks for a great app.
Real question is. Why can't someone legit make a kingroot type rooter that's not all jacked. It's there really no one else who knows how to do it that is honest?
craigviar said:
I recently upgraded my old s4 for hangouts only use (no carrier) to 501 and I used an old version of Kingroot and current SuperSUme. No worries. Thanks for a great app.
Real question is. Why can't someone legit make a kingroot type rooter that's not all jacked. It's there really no one else who knows how to do it that is honest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, it can be done. But they protect, for good reasons, their rooting methods. I can't disagree with them there. But someone else would have to come out with the exploits and wrap it into a rooting method for everyone to use. They definitely have the team and resources to be able to root devices. I am very thankful for that, don't get me wrong, but the way they make you accept it all is where I take issue.
KennyG123 said:
LOL...I can move your vote but not your name....done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for correcting this..
Xda has a rule about having paid apps/donate version in threads. It does not seem unreasonable to ask for a similar policy with the more important and less costly demand of being able to uninstall the app, or at least not block the usage of other apps (like SuperSU).
Sent from my Nexus 6P using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Surge1223 said:
Xda has a rule about having paid apps/donate version in threads. It does not seem unreasonable to ask for a similar policy with the more important and less costly demand of being able to uninstall the app, or at least not least not block the usage of other apps (like SuperSU).
Sent from my Nexus 6P using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree completely. Again, malicious behavior.
If so, why is the Kingroot thread and apps still here? Why didn't the mods closed it?
thanks for the info
so the only app root that do that is kingroot only ?
all othr app are safe ?
ashraf77160 said:
thanks for the info
so the only app root that do that is kingroot only ?
all othr app are safe ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question, are there safe to use root apps? Noob friendly guide is welcome too.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn HUAWEI MT7-L09 met Tapatalk
artsnjiw said:
If so, why is the Kingroot thread and apps still here? Why didn't the mods closed it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a great question
Sent from my Nexus 6P using XDA-Developers Legacy app
artsnjiw said:
If so, why is the Kingroot thread and apps still here? Why didn't the mods closed it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because we have not been able to prove that is what is going on, the ability is there, but this is extremely difficult to prove. But, the Adware and Malware are real and has been reported by AVG and others.
Different versions/payloads??
gatesjunior said:
Because we have not been able to prove that is what is going on, the ability is there, but this is extremely difficult to prove. But, the Adware and Malware are real and has been reported by AVG and others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After a bit of digging through the same versions released, one on their website (https://kingroot.net/), and the other here on xda (https://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/?id=9793#downloads), it appears that the payloads have been customized through some variances contained in the following files:
channel.ini, config.properties, KINGROOT.RSA, MANIFEST.MF, KINGROOT.SF, km, classes.dex
Specifically in the release channel# (channel.ini), the encrypted properties file (propertiesconfig.properties), and the (km) file.
So it's possible to have slightly different version of the payloads depending on where you've downloaded it from.
Any constructive input is welcome.
billa said:
After a bit of digging through the same versions released, one on their website (https://kingroot.net/), and the other here on xda (https://forum.xda-developers.com/devdb/project/?id=9793#downloads), it appears that the payloads have been customized through some variances contained in the following files:
channel.ini, config.properties, KINGROOT.RSA, MANIFEST.MF, KINGROOT.SF, km, classes.dex
Specifically in the release channel# (channel.ini), the encrypted properties file (propertiesconfig.properties), and the (km) file.
So it's possible to have slightly different version of the payloads depending on where you've downloaded it from.
Any constructive input is welcome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting.. I wonder even though the release is the same, is the build a different number ?
Do you think it might have to do with trying different methods to root the device?
gatesjunior said:
Interesting.. I wonder even though the release is the same, is the a different number ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a different build number bro.if u look at the build number compared to first realease of 5.05 compared to latest release 5.05 theres a few extra numbers and/or letters in the new 5.05. But like one of the xda devs said if it's to the only way to get root do it because u can uninstall purify and replace kinguser with supersu
Using SuperSU is best.
gatesjunior said:
Because we have not been able to prove that is what is going on, the ability is there, but this is extremely difficult to prove. But, the Adware and Malware are real and has been reported by AVG and others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noob question here, flashing a ROM will remove whole kingroot stuff ? or there is some deep thing that can't be removed ?
JIJOK said:
noob question here, flashing a ROM will remove whole kingroot stuff ? or there is some deep thing that can't be removed ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it will
Hello,
I want present my new app. that is in beta stage but fully functional: Phone usage monitor.
With this app you will be able to know when and how much you use your device and the apps that you have in it.
Please, report issues, if any, and suggest more events to monitorize.
Thanks
Play Store Description
Are you obsessed with your phone?
Up to what point?
Do you want to be aware of which apps are the most used?
Do you want to know what WiFi networks you connect to and at what time?
When are your applications updated?
Do you want to know if your phone suffers a expontaneous reboot or when you turn on or off the screen?
You need this app and you know it!
Play store link
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ryosoftware.phoneusagemonitor
Looking good! An option to exclude certain apps like Nova Launcher would be nice.
WDawn said:
Looking good! An option to exclude certain apps like Nova Launcher would be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the suggestion. Great idea!
It would also be nice to be able to monitor a remote phone (opening up the app to for parental monitoring for example).
This could be achieved by either allowing to :
- send a daily report by mail
- having a client app with data synced whenever a connection is avaialable
- sending data to a central server
...
anyway to export the data as .csv ?
Hello, thanks for app!
Any chance to remove "full network access" from permissions in future ?
Heya! Congrats on making the portal. Good stuff you got there.
Here's some suggestions for the intro texts:
Part 1 - Current
"Do you want to know how do you use your smartphone?
You have installed this app, so the answer will surely be affirmative.
With this app you can know with what apps you lose your time; time which you could lose living your real life..."
Part 1 - Suggested
"Would you like to know how you use your smartphone?
Well, as you've already installed this app, that'll be an affirmative!
By gathering statistics about your apps with Phone Usage Monitor, you'll know where your precious time is creeping off to. Time you might want to spend on living your real life..."
Part 1 - Motivation
The second "do" doesn't really have a function in the first sentence and I made it a bit softer to make a more friendly first impression. I mentioned the app's name to remind the user what's going to help them (branding, be proud of your creation). I stayed true to your intention, the reference to 'real life', but made that a bit softer as well by using "might" and not mentioning a negative word like "lose". We're all winners here!
Part 2 - Current
"To let us know this information we will run a service in the background to monitor the use you make of your smartphone.
Quiet!, it will not consume more than a little bit of the precious battery of your mobile..."
Part 2 - Suggested
"You're probably wondering how much battery this app will consume. Don't worry, just a tiny bit.
Think about the time you will save after gaining all this usage intel. You won't even need as much battery anymore."
Part 2 - Motivation
Shouting "Quiet!" doesn't come across very friendly. There's also never a comma after an exclamation mark. I wrote the text to match the battery icon better. I'm also pushing the major goal of the app forward.
Part 3 - Current
"We will give you more information if you let us see how do you use the apps in your device..."
Part 3 - Suggested
"Sorry to bother you but I will need some usage access in order to provide you with all these awesome statistics. Is that okay with you?"
Part 3 - Motivation
"let us see" gives the impression multiple people or a company will be watching along, which totally isn't the case. I wrote it a bit more personal, fun and friendly.
Part 4 - Current
"Do not worry!
The data we collect is NOT sent anywhere."
Part 4 - Suggested
"Do not worry!
The data I collect is NOT sent anywhere."
Part 4 - Motivation
As in part 3, It's better to speak from a first person point of view, "I" instead of "we". It's just the app and the user, "you and me", which is a more comforting thought.
Instead of "START APP" I'd use something more vivid like "Lets go!" or "Show me some numbers!" or "Start saving time!"
The UDPA looks good, people are used to not reading these disclaimers and accepting them anyway. It's also a nice reminder that even if there is a "we", it's literally stating no personal data will be collected on any server. Kudos! :highfive:
I personally don't like the last paragraph but ah well, one has to make a living, right?
Looking forward to those stats...
Timmmmaaahh said:
Heya! Congrats on making the portal. Good stuff you got there.
Here's some suggestions for the intro texts:
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, thanks, thanks!
I have updated the app with your suggestions.
English isn't my matter language
MaXX99 said:
It would also be nice to be able to monitor a remote phone (opening up the app to for parental monitoring for example).
This could be achieved by either allowing to :
- send a daily report by mail
- having a client app with data synced whenever a connection is avaialable
- sending data to a central server
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need to think on it.
I would not like it to be used without consent to spy on anyone :/
legendnexus said:
anyway to export the data as .csv ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds pretty good.
I have added to the ToDo
panfiluta said:
Hello, thanks for app!
Any chance to remove "full network access" from permissions in future ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but Internet permission is needed to display Ads.
I understand that you do not believe in my word when I say that I am not sending data anywhere, but I need to access the Internet to load the Ads
Please add export data functionality! Csv format for example. Great app otherwise, thanks!
Crashing
Hi,. Unfortunately the app crashes every time I open it on my OnePlus 6 that runs Android 9. The first time run screens work fine and permissions are assigned ok but then I can't open the app. I have tried clearing the storage/cache and that hasn't helped. Any ideas what to try next please?
Hi
Assuming you're rooted, please, post a logcat or send by email.
Thanks
Peteba said:
Hi,. Unfortunately the app crashes every time I open it on my OnePlus 6 that runs Android 9. The first time run screens work fine and permissions are assigned ok but then I can't open the app. I have tried clearing the storage/cache and that hasn't helped. Any ideas what to try next please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bartito said:
Hi
Assuming you're rooted, please, post a logcat or send by email.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry no not rooted..
Peteba said:
Sorry no not rooted..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, I will try it by my self
Hello
I've tried but no luck reproducing the issue.
If possible, enter app settings then enable debug mode then reproduce the issue then sent the log file.
If not possible, please, contact by email or PM to receive a debug version of the app to track the issue.
Thanks in advance
Peteba said:
Sorry no not rooted..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Peteba said:
Hi,. Unfortunately the app crashes every time I open it on my OnePlus 6 that runs Android 9. The first time run screens work fine and permissions are assigned ok but then I can't open the app. I have tried clearing the storage/cache and that hasn't helped. Any ideas what to try next please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same Problem on my OnePlus 6 (A6003) running Android 9 (OxygenOS: 9.0.4)
max_m42 said:
I have the same Problem on my OnePlus 6 (A6003) running Android 9 (OxygenOS: 9.0.4)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have answered your PM
hi, in my view for PRO version i would like to keep data live for 365days and to export them in csv in order to analize with spreadsheet or other stuff.
thanks
Hi!
To help someone in my family, i need to disable access to Internet for specific apps. For example, access to WhatsApp but not to any web browser (or only for selected websites).
This person had an iPhone before and this was very easy to do on it
I already tested Open Time Limit but this seems to be too much easy to disable.
Do you know any app (working rootless if possible) or any custom rom that would allow that?
EDIT: And if the app is open source, thats even better!
A huge thank if you can help me
You can use ScreenTime.
There you can also set Timers.
and you can Block permanently apps like Settings.
kerem._trk said:
You can use ScreenTime.
There you can also set Timers.
and you can Block permanently apps like Settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That looks nice, will try !
Do you know any open source alternative ? The main reason this family member is not buying an iPhone again is about privacy (sry didnt mention it)
etienne_9000 said:
That looks nice, will try !
Do you know any open source alternative ? The main reason this family member is not buying an iPhone again is about privacy (sry didnt mention it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screen Time is working too with iPhone I think
kerem._trk said:
Screen Time is working too with iPhone I think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His iPhone is broken and he wants something an open source and google-free OS, so he probably wont buy an iPhone again :/
kerem._trk said:
Screen Time is working too with iPhone I think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its available on App Store
etienne_9000 said:
His iPhone is broken and he wants something open source and google free, so he probably wont buy an iPhone again :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can download Screen Time APK
you can download Screen Time APK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i found it on ApkMirror
But i really prefer something open source :/
Sorry, im asking for something quite specific
What do you mean? I hope I can help
kerem._trk said:
What do you mean? I hope I can help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, let's sum it up. I need :
- an open source app (unfortunately Screen Time is closed-source) on Android
- or a custom rom (open source too) with built-in parental control
etienne_9000 said:
Okay, let's sum it up. I need :
- an open source app (unfortunately Screen Time is closed-source) on Android
- or a custom rom (open source too) with built-in parental control
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouh Sorry i didnt understand it..
I think on LineageOS 17.1 with Gapps there could be Parental Control settings
if not you can use https://www.xda-developers.com/heimdall-free-parental-control-app/amp/ I found it on Google. let me know if that helped you if not I'm Sorry because i don't know even
kerem._trk said:
Ouh Sorry i didnt understand it..
I think on LineageOS 17.1 with Gapps there could be Parental Control settings
if not you can use https://www.xda-developers.com/heimdall-free-parental-control-app/amp/ I found it on Google. let me know if that helped you if not I'm Sorry because i don't know even ☹
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heimdall looks interesting! Not open source but not using Internet (so i will be able to disable Internet access in the options) so it looks interesting
About Gapps, he wants his phone to run without Google so no gapps (would be too easy )
okay let me know if this works
not ready yet, but soon there will be an open source alternative, keep an eye on its release:
ActivityWatch - Apps on Google Play
Track how you spend your time on your devices.
play.google.com
agonoize said:
not ready yet, but soon there will be an open source alternative, keep an eye on its release:
ActivityWatch - Apps on Google Play
Track how you spend your time on your devices.
play.google.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay
agonoize said:
not ready yet, but soon there will be an open source alternative, keep an eye on its release:
ActivityWatch - Apps on Google Play
Track how you spend your time on your devices.
play.google.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks interesting too, thanks!
etienne_9000 said:
Hi!
To help someone in my family, i need to disable access to Internet for specific apps. For example, access to WhatsApp but not to any web browser (or only for selected websites).
This person had an iPhone before and this was very easy to do on it
I already tested Open Time Limit but this seems to be too much easy to disable.
Do you know any app (working rootless if possible) or any custom rom that would allow that?
EDIT: And if the app is open source, thats even better!
A huge thank if you can help me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good ... Parental Control in G-Store,
Tekodrink said:
good ... Parental Control in G-Store,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Opensource apps could be found at some repositories
You can also use netguard thats free on fdroid and block internet access to specific applications while letting the others work.
I'm a Typeapp user for my mailaccounts. Since the latest upgrade to Android 13 it does not always show a notification. Randomly.
Typeapp suggested to alter the Battery Manager to allow the app running in the background. Did not help.
Then I tried a few other email apps for a week or so, but the same issue occured: not always a notification in time.
My idea is that this issue does not belong to the mailapp, but possibly Android 13 does something in the background that prevents a notification. Sometimes (and that's the irritating part!).
Somebody recognizes this?
Mauvan said:
Somebody recognizes this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This sounds somewhat familiar to me already since Android 11 where several people had the same issue regarding SMS/text messages arriving in time in Android (according to the logcat) but the notification message was often triggered few minutes or much later.
For a workaround for the SMS/text messages notification delay problem, effective at least for the default SMS/text/messaging app com.android.messaging, see the following GitLab issue (for klte) which even lead to one of the LineageOS developers reporting the bug to Google with the corresponding issue still being unresolved/open.
[Update 23.10.2022 for the sake of completeness]:
Other users reported the same problem for different phones No SMS while screen off and Notifications for incoming messages are delayed after device has been sleeping for a long time
It seems to me that this is a typical SMS-issue. I think my issue is a more general thing and I will try a hard reset and start with a clean Android 13 setup.
I'll give feedback afterwards... (when time and availability let me fix it)
Mauvan said:
It seems to me that this is a typical SMS-issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reception of the SMS was/is not the problem in this case since it appears immediately after sending in the log but the notification triggers with a large delay/late.
Therefore I can imagine, that this is a general notification bug which also appears in other apps.
Simply trying out the command takes a few seconds and observing the behavior also only takes very little time.
Personally I would invest this little time before doing a hard rest ... but perhaps I am the only one who enjoys doing other things in his spare time much more rather than hard resetting his phone and going through the following tedious installation and setup of all apps from scratch.
I know, it is no fun doing those things like install and setup your phone
But what if I really cannot find the com.android.messaging app amongst all system apps? Or does it have a different name since A13??
Mauvan said:
I know, it is no fun doing those things like install and setup your phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mauvan said:
I will try a hard reset and start with a clean Android 13 setup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote my sentence in a "teasing" way but with the winking smiley because you seemed very determined reinstalling everything from scratch without trying the suggested workaround.
And since different people have different interests, there was still a small chance that you prefer having a clean Android installation anyway from time to time and simply want to make sure that the problem arose from a "dirty" upgrade from A12 to A13.
Anyway, I am now confused by your following statement:
Mauvan said:
But what if I really cannot find the com.android.messaging app amongst all system apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The way I understood you is, that your issue did (at the moment) only affect email apps.
1.
Did you also observe the notification delay with the stock SMS/text messaging app?
2.
If not, what is the reason why you now want to identify the stock SMS/text messaging app?
Mauvan said:
Or does it have a different name since A13?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This I don't know.
3.
If 1. == yes, is the app name displayed in the app info options menu (the place of the other settings like permissions, storage & cache, etc.) when you scroll all the way to the bottom (as it is the case in A12)?
4.
If 3. == no, then you can possibly identify it using the output of
Code:
adb shell pm list packages
or paste the result here so we can have a guess.
wireroot said:
I wrote my sentence in a "teasing" way but with the winking smiley
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course I got the wink
wireroot said:
1.
Did you also observe the notification delay with the stock SMS/text messaging app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Mail only.
wireroot said:
2.
If not, what is the reason why you now want to identify the stock SMS/text messaging app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just scrolling through that "Gitlab issue" (the link you added before)
wireroot said:
If 3. == no, then you can possibly identify it using the output ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure how to do this.
Both technical and my language skills makes this a time consuming thing, but I'll try later.
Mauvan said:
No. Mail only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if it only occurs in the mail apps, then let's stick with those.
So, instead of whitelisting the SMS/text app, I suggest to try the battery optimization whitelisting procedure with those.
As a first step, please execute the current content of the battery optimization whitelist by calling
Code:
adb shell dumpsys deviceidle whitelist
and paste the result (list of apps) in this thread.
This should help us in better understanding whether the whitelisting step via ADB (which was either already done by you via the Android UI, or if not, which we'll do once we have the result from the above call) actually changes the whitelist content.
Mauvan said:
Typeapp suggested to alter the Battery Manager to allow the app running in the background. Did not help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By "which was either already done by you via the Android UI" I am referring to the thing you have done as stated in your statement quoted above. Since the information how you did it is quite vague, I need the requested info.
Mauvan said:
I'm not sure how to do this [...] but I'll try later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since we are now ignoring the SMS/text ab, you can forget about the adb shell pm list packages command but need to execute the other (ADB) command mentioned above.
There are many tutorials on how to use ADB - I am only (randomly) posting the official instructions:
https://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/adb
So you mainly need 2 things:
PC: ADB executable - downloadable from https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/platform-tools
Android: Settings > System > Developer Options > USB debugging
There's not even an option in Settings > System for USB debugging and Developer Options in my Pixel.
In another life I was a programmer but this goes beyond my capabilities (and patience to figure it out).
I give up.
Thanks for all your efforts, but it's all abacadabra for me. A hard reset is almost faster
Mauvan said:
There's not even an option in Settings > System for USB debugging and Developer Options in my Pixel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you didn't enable it yet, then this is no rocket science. Simply read the manual which I already posted above where this specific step is answered in this section.
Mauvan said:
but this goes beyond my capabilities (and patience to figure it out).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sure you would manage that. But since my suggestions only have a small chance but no guarantee that they solve the problem, I understand that you are not eager trying it out.
Btw: Also clicking the thanks/like button is always a welcome gesture to people in the forum
Once you did a clean install and made some observations regarding your problem, please drop us a line here about the result as it may help others too with their decision!