Database Info

setcpu testing

I must of spent hr and hrs trying roms to find the easiest and fastest roms out there. But when you find one that flows nicely and without fc's. How to test which one is faster. I downloaded setcpu and tried to understand it. Now after flashing a rom, I set the phone the exact way for each rom. Exept hero roms( slow) and flashy. I dont need that , my option. I did some tests using setcpu. 10 tests at 528. 384 works great for battery saving(sleep,charging) w/10mb hack.
cyanogen 4.2.14.1 fast avg .... 6.60ms
fasttest 2.3 faster avg .... 6.50ms
fasttest 2.6 fastest avg .... 6.25ms
i'm using task killer,lock,weater wiget,battery widget,setcpu,htmtouch input all ignored. task killer avg 30m
mytouch 3g
I thing this a simple way to test these new rons on who is the fastest. My option.

gadget421 said:
I think this a simple way to test these new ROMs to see which is the best, IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are many changes you can do to get a lower or higher MS, hero roms usually have a lower MS than a donut ROM. So this isn't full proof.

Dwang 1.17.1: best 571 ms; worst 591 ms
There's no competition, this is the ROM you want if speed and stability is your thing. It's so good Dwang hasn't updated it for a while (there's nothing to improve IMHO).
P.S. this test is not 100% relevant, user experience is the ultimate test but that's hard to compare.

Its personal opinion. I personally love Super D. I stick more with his and Openeclair ROM's so yeah.
..personal opinion.

Open Eclair 1.2.2 is the fastest eclair ROM i've ever run... ever. It's as fast as CM! but it's not out to the general public yet, lol. but yeah just a heads up, grab it as soon as it's out!

Yeah OpenEclair is the best!!! for an Eclair rom

[ROM] Super D 1.9.3 with [Official] WG-Kernel v3-beta(10mb RHack) -- Need Feedback!

Features
- Fully 100% SuperD 1.9.3
- Running the latest WG-Kernel v3-beta[10mb RHack / CFS]
e.g. This new kernel gave OpenEclair users a tremendous speed performance boost in the latest 1.2.2
- Removed DangerSPL Requirement
- CompCache is enabled by default at 16mb
- Adjusted Scheduler Values to help support the CFS Scheduler
- Adjusted LowMemKiller Values to help support apps that should be kept alive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download: http://www.androidspin.com/downloads.php?dir=wesgarner/ROM/&file=SuperD193-blk-WGKv3beta.zip
I made this for fun since someone had made a version of SuperD based off my kernel from back well months ago lol - thought I should give a try at working on the ROM
This is a pretty one time thing. If people like the speed differences a lot, someone talk to Ben about working the kernel into SuperD

I will be monitering this thread for feedback

This have the RAM hack?

CaptainShanks said:
This have the RAM hack?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup yup, sorry just added that

will keep you posted. i got the update during class so it's something i'll be playing with the next couple days. thanks brah.

Starting it up now.
Edit: Right off the bat i was able to go from flashed to homescreen in about 3 minutes.
Everything looks smooth so far, i'm in the process of installing some apps. Should be fun

Testing out now, thanks Wes!
Feedback - will add to this list
ADB is working (not currently working on RHack versions of 1.9.3)
CC works fine
BT works
BenchmarkPi is a LIL bit faster (between 12970 - 13650 for WG-Kernel) will test orig tomorrow
Overall: Seems speedy so far, gonna be hard to tell the difference as Ben's kernel is already pretty quick
EDIT: For those of you that are lazy like me, you CANNOT simply pull and flash the boot.img as it breaks CC. Just FYI

[ROM] Super D 1.9.3 with [Official] WG-Kernel v3-beta(10mb RHack)
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.

flashing now...

chris6551 said:
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All day?

chris6551 said:
I have been using this all day and it is running really smooth without any problems at all. It is very fast and I have not noticed any glitches yet, I'm loving it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a question, but how have you been running this all day. It was just released like ~40min ago. If you mean SuperD 1.9.3 then your in the wrong forum, this is just for the WG-Kernel for SuperD193

Is wipe recommended coming from SD 1.9.3?

So this is the SuperD everyone is talking about with wes's kernel added and I DON'T need Danger SPL to flash it? Tell me I have this correct. I've been wanting to try this rom out but have tried to avoid the DSPL route. Any partition lay out requirements?

no its the same as superd but just with dif kernel we are looking for differances to compare to, as I use cyanogen kernel in mine and ya benchmark speed test etc on this ROM

bbuchacher said:
no its the same as superd but just with dif kernel we are looking for differances to compare to, as I use cyanogen kernel in mine and ya benchmark speed test etc on this ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this.. is... QUICK!
with the original 1.9.3 With ram hack, i had this weird dragging effect, and slow from the get go, but this version is QUICK!
bbuchacher you should DEFENATELY use this kernel, or find some way to make your kernel faster than this, great work ben and great work wes, you guys are geniouses

Im also noticing an increase in performance.

Without doing much tests, the system feels faster with this kernel at least when changing apps and switching between desktops. BTW, is there a way to do a more "objective" speed test?

Thoughts on the need to wipe coming from Super D 1.9.3 to this???

So I guess because of the ram hack, I wouldn't be able to play all the cool games.

Works like a charm. Much faster then the standard kernel.

[1.267GHz!!!] [Devs] Overclocking/undervolting patches (update 6/15)

I got an EVO myself and managed to overclock it to 1.267GHz. We could probably go even higher, but that requires more extensive changes. Here are the changed source files: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36553/supersonic_oc-uv.tar.gz
It also includes an undervolt courtesy of pershoot (a whole 0.1V lower when idle, which should help battery drain a lot!). Here is a test update.zip: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36553/supersonic_oc-uv_signed.zip (working WiFi). Make sure to do a nandroid backup first!
Sensors/camera do not currently work in this kernel because the source is not yet complete.
There is an overvolt on the highest frequencies. It should not cause any issues. Thanks to toastcfh for his source, Herver for creating the first booting overclocked kernel on the EVO, all the kernel devs in the N1 community, especially pershoot and kmobs, richardtrip from the Desire community, koush for anykernel updater, and all who helped to root the EVO. Enjoy!
Update 6/15: Fixed 950mV undervolt. Raised voltages from 1228800 above to improve stability. Source files updated and update.zip uploaded.
old said:
I posted these in an earlier thread, but I think I should bring this to everyone's attention. Here are some simple patches that will overclock the Evo up to 1.267GHz (though by any means it's not guaranteed to get that high!):
Edit: please don't flash the below update.zip, as it doesn't seem to boot. Devs, the patches are still below, and a zimage is in the anykernel update zip.
Update: I compiled it myself. Here is an update.zip: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36553/update-oc_signed.zip. This uses toastcfh's sources, Koush's excellent anykernel updater and a config.gz pulled from a stock Supersonic. If this doesn't boot, no damage will be done to your phone. Just reboot into recovery and reinstall your ROM. You can test overclocking by grabbing SetCPU from my sig or changing the cpufreq values if you know how. Once we get this working, I will create an undervolted version for battery savings. I'd get an Evo, but it's sold out everywhere T_T
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/36553/supersonic_oc.zip
cpufreq.c and acpuclock-scorpion.c are in arch/arm/mach-msm, and supersonic_defconfig is just the config. I don't have an Evo, so I can't test these out, but these should work with the source files toastcfh posted earlier: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=686240.
Undervolting can be achieved simply by adjusting the voltages (in mV) in the acpu_freq_tbl table in acpuclock-scorpoion.c. For those not familiar with his work, you can see pershoot's safe (but lower) voltages for the N1 here: http://github.com/pershoot/nexus-kernel/blob/master/acpuclock-scorpion.c. If you want to overvolt or go under 1000mV, you have to make one further adjustment to the voltage regulator in board-supersonic.c.
Note that the N1 and the Evo are completely different devices (with similar processors), so what may work for the N1 may not work for the Evo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Awesome... until I am sure this is stable, I will wait, but I must have overclock

jigglywiggly said:
Awesome... until I am sure this is stable, I will wait, but I must have overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't recommend overclocking, the devices already can run warm at current settings.
But then again, you are entitled to do as you wish.
Options better than overclocking are to remove the Sprint bloatware and strip down parts of Sense, this speeds things up alot by removing excess background applications.

Well it ain't too bad, my Droid at 1 ghz(550 stock) runs great.
So this should be good too.

I like overclocking as much as the next geek, but on the Evo... WHY?
This phone has yet to respond anything slower than instantly to my input and I expect a difference of .26 ghz would not make it so it could read my thoughts.
Undervolting, on the other hand, could help with the abysmal battery life...

phinnaeus said:
I like overclocking as much as the next geek, but on the Evo... WHY?
This phone has yet to respond anything slower than instantly to my input and I expect a difference of .26 ghz would not make it so it could read my thoughts.
Undervolting, on the other hand, could help with the abysmal battery life...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people love to run benchmarks. Try to improve on them over and over. Others like the feeling of just going faster. Also some apps or some in the future might require a faster running phone. What better way to achieve that (other then buying a new phone) then OC.
Also in the future, are you not gunna buy a 1.5ghz processor phone running 2.1 because a 1ghz processor can already do it? OC has many benefits, just not to everyone, most because they dont understand the consequences or benefits.
My htc hero clocked to 768mhz can run 2.1 and everything near instant. Still doesnt keep be from wanting a 1ghz or higher.
Also one more thing, 2.2 will be out soon. With full flash support, i have a feeling its going to require a lot of CPU. An OC Evo would probably run many things from 2.2 a lot easier.

Well, I agree with the benchmarking comments but on the subject of Froyo... Froyo is designed to be even faster on equivalent hardware than 2.1... and 2.1 on my Evo is smooth as silk. And the Evo handles most Flash I can throw at it, so I'm not sure. I have however noticed a small performance difference with live wallpaper running, so maybe OCing will clear that up a bit.

Jus10o said:
Some people love to run benchmarks. Try to improve on them over and over. Others like the feeling of just going faster. Also some apps or some in the future might require a faster running phone. What better way to achieve that (other then buying a new phone) then OC.
Also in the future, are you not gunna buy a 1.5ghz processor phone running 2.1 because a 1ghz processor can already do it? OC has many benefits, just not to everyone, most because they dont understand the consequences or benefits.
My htc hero clocked to 768mhz can run 2.1 and everything near instant. Still doesnt keep be from wanting a 1ghz or higher.
Also one more thing, 2.2 will be out soon. With full flash support, i have a feeling its going to require a lot of CPU. An OC Evo would probably run many things from 2.2 a lot easier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know, this is an excellent point and I feel like I failed the developer community in some small way when you had to bring it up. You shouldn't have to provide a reason for wanting progress, it should happen for its own sake.
Proceed.

Jus10o said:
Some people love to run benchmarks. Try to improve on them over and over. Others like the feeling of just going faster. Also some apps or some in the future might require a faster running phone. What better way to achieve that (other then buying a new phone) then OC.
Also in the future, are you not gunna buy a 1.5ghz processor phone running 2.1 because a 1ghz processor can already do it? OC has many benefits, just not to everyone, most because they dont understand the consequences or benefits.
My htc hero clocked to 768mhz can run 2.1 and everything near instant. Still doesnt keep be from wanting a 1ghz or higher.
Also one more thing, 2.2 will be out soon. With full flash support, i have a feeling its going to require a lot of CPU. An OC Evo would probably run many things from 2.2 a lot easier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with everything you just said, and I am less than excited about the benchmarks with the EVO thus far

Roman G said:
Agree with everything you just said, and I am less than excited about the benchmarks with the EVO thus far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAHAHA.. im sorry but i had to laugh at your sig.

Jus10o said:
HAHAHA.. im sorry but i had to laugh at your sig.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya I sold my hero a couple weeks before the EVO dropped, and had to use my wife's old phone.

phinnaeus said:
I like overclocking as much as the next geek, but on the Evo... WHY?
This phone has yet to respond anything slower than instantly to my input and I expect a difference of .26 ghz would not make it so it could read my thoughts.
Undervolting, on the other hand, could help with the abysmal battery life...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not trying to start an argument at all but you have to think broader mathematically. If the processor runs at 1000Mhz or 999mhz (In the case of my N1) a .267 increase is 267mhz, a 26.7% increase in computational performance... That's pretty raw especially in cellphone terms, that have no way to vent or displace that kind of heat.
Has anyone noticed how much hotter the kickstand gets? I bet you that it's attached to something the cpu is connected to. $5 bucks says we will see KICKSTAND HEATSINK + FAN MOD 2GHZ OC! LOL

thebluecoat said:
I'm not trying to start an argument at all but you have to think broader mathematically. If the processor runs at 1000Mhz or 999mhz (In the case of my N1) a .267 increase is 267mhz, a 26.7% increase in computational performance... That's pretty raw especially in cellphone terms, that have no way to vent or displace that kind of heat.
Has anyone noticed how much hotter the kickstand gets? I bet you that it's attached to something the cpu is connected to. $5 bucks says we will see KICKSTAND HEATSINK + FAN MOD 2GHZ OC! LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a patch for developers, not a discussion thread for the merits (or lack thereof) of overclocking.
If you don't want to overclock your phone, nobody is making you.
It has worked out fine in the Desire and Nexus One community.

coolbho3000 said:
This is a patch for developers, not a discussion thread for the merits (or lack thereof) of overclocking.
If you don't want to overclock your phone, nobody is making you.
It has worked out fine in the Desire and Nexus One community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do i apply this ???????
can u make it flashable?

mccurt29 said:
how do i apply this ???????
can u make it flashable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
need to follow the directions in the first post. the .c files need to be loaded into the kernel source (right now just have toast's soruce) and the kernel has to be compiled with them.
if somebody wants to compile up a kernel with these, we could start testing. if i get some free time i'll help out here and compile a kernel but somebody else will prob beat me to it!

please someone let us know how this works out for your evo 4g... benchmark, test results... anything to show better/worse performance, whether your got ALOT warmer, or just a lil, etc.. ne information would be greatly appreciated it, i'm not a 100% noob, i just know how to follow instructions very well, doesn't mean i understand everything that's going on, just the basic concept of what i want. thank you in advance.

madunix said:
please someone let us know how this works out for your evo 4g... benchmark, test results... anything to show better/worse performance, whether your got ALOT warmer, or just a lil, etc.. ne information would be greatly appreciated it, i'm not a 100% noob, i just know how to follow instructions very well, doesn't mean i understand everything that's going on, just the basic concept of what i want. thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm waiting for someone to compile this first.
If nobody steps forward, I'll make my own attempt, but I'll be working blind with no test hardware.

I'm pretty sure most devs are waiting on the htc source kernal before playing with this. I can't wait but I understand them being hesitant to do too much with this for now. Still awesome of you to post it and have it rdy for when that time comes!

sounds good.

madunix said:
sounds good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your signature says you have a radio of 1.32.651.6, just to let you know that is not a radio, that is an HTC software OTA update. My radio is 1.39.00.05.31 for example

[KERNEL][GPL][ACS]Xtreme Kernel v1.2.0-Lucy-1.3GHz OC,Battery,Tweaked Voodoo(options)

ANDROID CREATIVE SYNDICATE​presents​XTREME KERNEL V1.2.0​
First of all, I want to put my thank yous up here at the top, so, here they are:
-geniusdog254 - My primary teammate, been helping me every step of way.
-nullghost - One really cool dude. Always on when I ask for help. Git would still be a scary thing if not for him.
-rjmjr69 - Funny, funny dude. Keeps me motivated to keep going
-The Voodoo Team - Your work is awesome!
-My beta testers - You were/are all great. Thanks for helping me with this!
-All the devs across the board - Seriously, you're all a bunch of absolutely awesome people.
-Anyone I forgot - You're all great!
Now, here we go:
THE STANDARD DISCLAIMER
I, DevinXtreme, AM NOT responsible for what happens to your phone, your cat, your house, or anything relating to you! If your phone bricks, OH WELL. Have a nice day.
This kernel has a MixUp kernel base. DI18, blah blah. I deviated once Interactive got working. I also removed the Voodoo color modification. So, there's that.
It is built and designed for Syndicate ROM, which will be out later tonight. Sickest ROM you've ever seen. The version released with the ROM is slightly different, but only for fun's sake
Changelog:
v1.2.0
-Removed the 1.6GHz step. The time machine is gone. Plus, was causing more problems than it was helping.
-Added 1.3GHz step courtesy Herver
-Switched from MPLL to APLL. Smoothness and speed increase. Thanks to nullghost for help on this.
-Added Voodoo color mod, tweaked version, courtesy Herver. I will be maintaining a no-voodoo version. I just haven't yet.
-Tweaked the light sensor, adding a new step and made it not jump to the brightest setting as much. Should save battery and transition smoother. Also pols a little more often.
-Tweaked scaling rules for 1.3GHz. Should scale there less, thus saving battery.
ADDITION: The file ending in 'nv.zip' is a no-voodoo version. The file ending in 'ov.zip' is the version for the original voodoo mod, not the tweaked one.
v1.0.1
-Fixed scaling. Linpack scores and tests work fine now.
-Disabled Carrier IQ in init.rc. Carrier IQ is essentially Sprint spyware. Kernel devs: This is really easy to do. Just comment out the iqmsd lines at the end.
v1.0
-Overclock to 1.6GHz!! Requires SetCPU which is, for some reason, defaulting to performance. Make sure you change it to conservative.
-Default governor without SetCPU is conservative with 200MHz-1GHz steps.
-Removed Voodoo
-Framerate unlocked (78-80fps)
-Built for ROMs with a custom boot. Makes stock boot look like garbage. We're working (still) to fix this.
-Undervolted
KNOWN BUGS:
-In spare parts, if you set the WiFi policy to never sleep, it still sleeps with the screen off. -skandranon314
-Some weird vibration thing going on when 1.6GHz is hit.
NOTES:
Linpack is being strange with this. I'm getting between 9.2 and 9.8 with some REALLY strange numbers. I'll have this fixed this weekend.
SetCPU sets the default governor to performance. If you use it, be sure to change it immediately for battery life.
FOR 1.2
-I recommend 200MHz-1200MHz. Some phones can't reach 1.3GHz safely.
-200MHz - 800/1000MHz is a great setting for battery and you should still have a very smooth experience.
For those who care, I get 1135+ in quadrant.
You can read my source here.
Thanks, guys. I hope you enjoy!

How stable is this??

When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Looking forward to trying this out!

1.6 GHz???????
That's awesome, though I don't think I'll crank it that high.
Is there any advantage to this vs MixUp running at 1.0 Ghz?

spitefulrain said:
How stable is this??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've hit no bumps, neither have my testers.
joshottley said:
When is the rom out?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give it a couple of hours.
SORRY, HAD TO TAKE IT DOWN FOR JUST A LITTLE BIT. EXPECT AT ~12:45AM MST.

Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??

I'm running it. Smooth so far.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Dusting the epic off now.

[email protected] said:
Dusting the epic off now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should have never abandoned dude lol.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Very smooth so far. got 1194 on quad, and 9.2 average on linpack. Wonder how the battery life will fare.

spitefulrain said:
Why take it down? I already downloaded and flashed, was that a bad idea??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!

DevinXtreme said:
Nope, just a tweak. Your phone is fine! XD
And I'll be in a movie, so I won't be able to get it up until then. Sorry guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?

Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.

spitefulrain said:
Ok, good. I was worried for a sec
So would you recommend flashing the new one when it's up since you're tweaking it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it'll be a good idea.

what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable

illogic6 said:
Hmm.. something's not right here. I just got 22 fps in Neocore with the removed kernel. What could I be doing wrong?
Edit: Switching from performance to conservative upped my results to 62 fps which is quite respectable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I was gonna say. I'm going good with Neocore as well.
d94 said:
what kind of voltage are you giving it to get 1.6 stable? based on what im reading, anything above 1.3/1.4 is pretty much unachievable on these devices and is not really the speed that the device is running thus the unscaled rise in benchmark scores. iv been following hero_over and he couldnt get a stable 1.4 OC although he did get 1.3ghz on stock volts stable..which keeps me wondering if we really can hit 1.6 stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of it is on my git. I release my source, as devs should with GPL. The problem is that the fsb isn't scaled properly, affecting the floating point processor, causing low Linpack scores. I'll have it worked out this weekend,

Bummer.... I missed the link the first go around..... Will be waiting
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

If this was a hero_over post, he'd be in trouble for a teaser post lol... just trolling lol. Had to have a smart ass comment

Quick. And stable so far
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

I highly recommend Calkulin+Clemsyn OC/UV kernel (1.5 ghz) rom

So, after people started reporting that their benchmarks are in the 3000's, I decided to flash from ginger RC1 and holy cow this is freakin' fast. Even before I ran the quadrant test everything felt so fast. Twice as fast as vegan gingerbread. I wanted to run the quadrant with all the apps and stuff that I'd be running (quickoffice, dolphin, etc.) and holy cow benchmark was still in the 3000's every time.
I ain't moving to any other rom until someone finds something faster.

Does the unit feel warm or hot ? The rated CPU clock speed is 1.2 (or 1.0, not sure). I am a bit concerned about overclocking to 1.5 at higher voltage. In addition, what apps that were slow and are needing this kind of power ?
Thanks

Sweet.. but honestly with out video drivers for gingerbread its utterly pointless for me :O( Keep us updated on how stable it is :O)

mydave1 said:
Does the unit feel warm or hot ? The rated CPU clock speed is 1.2 (or 1.0, not sure). I am a bit concerned about overclocking to 1.5 at higher voltage. In addition, what apps that were slow and are needing this kind of power ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since when did we "need" anything? The gtab will work just fine with the stock rom. But with a custom rom, it works better. The clakulin+clemsyn v3 combo works even better. I just like the raw power that it gives me.
Added by edit.
But to answer your questions, doesn't feel warm or hot to me at all. Battery life is undoubtedly reduced, although I'm still trying to determine by how much. Stand by for this.

ld2003 said:
Sweet.. but honestly with out video drivers for gingerbread its utterly pointless for me :O( Keep us updated on how stable it is :O)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This rom is froyo and video works great for me.

mydave1 said:
Does the unit feel warm or hot ? The rated CPU clock speed is 1.2 (or 1.0, not sure). I am a bit concerned about overclocking to 1.5 at higher voltage. In addition, what apps that were slow and are needing this kind of power ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was concerned about heat and the case feels a bit warmer but not significantly. I guess we will see over time. I would say battery life is reduced but I don't have any numbers. The devs have included a nifty OC profile based on battery life. This is my new favorite rom.

This combo is crazy fast. I scored a 3521 on quadrant. I have been running it for 24 hrs now with no issues. Does not seem to be running hot at all. Battery life seems fine but Im sure it is using more juice.
Sent from my UPC300-2.2 using Tapatalk

drum747 said:
This combo is crazy fast. I scored a 3521 on quadrant. I have been running it for 24 hrs now with no issues. Does not seem to be running hot at all. Battery life seems fine but Im sure it is using more juice.
Sent from my UPC300-2.2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Drum747,
Can you please run Smartbench2011 (free from market) and let us know.
Thanks.

rickyt63 said:
Hi Drum747,
Can you please run Smartbench2011 (free from market) and let us know.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here. Nuff said.
Edit.
Keep in mind that I've already installed apps like quickoffice and such. In other words, if I had ran this test right after I flashed this rom I'm sure the score would have been higher.

Here you go: 4484, that beats 345 xooms even overclocked . Oh my.
Sorry about the resolution. I didn't know if I posted at full size if the picture would be huge or not.
Sent from my UPC300-2.2 using Tapatalk

How the flying pigs did you get it up to 4484?

Ok, so I ran it a few more times and it seemed a little sluggish as I had been putting it through its paces today . I shut it down and rebooted. I just ran it 3 times in a row. My lowest score after letting it sit for a bit was 4521, best of the 3 was 4665! Yikes.
Sent from my UPC300-2.2 using Tapatalk

Here you go:
Sent from my Calkulinized and Clemsynized OC'd g tablet

I am also using and loving this rom. Love the smooth video with Froyo (but wish it could work with Ginger).
It feels slightly warmer than before I think, but the temp sensor never reads above 87 degrees F, which has to be a safe operating temp, right?
Consistently getting ~3500 quadrants with many apps.

PhilosophyDan said:
I am also using and loving this rom. Love the smooth video with Froyo (but wish it could work with Ginger).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Listen to me very carefully. The devs are doing this on their own time without getting paid. Us lowly humans don't wish anything. Ok? Clemsyn said he was going to do ginger soon, and that's his choice. We don't wish anything. Ok? He's not obligated to do anything. What he's done for froyo is way way way beyond what he's suppose to do, which is nothing. Ok? He made it clear just last week that his intention was to return the gtab and move on with his life. He then decided to stick around and created new roms that are almost twice as fast as previous roms.
If you're disappointed, then Clemsyn could just drop the whole thing and leave. If you're disappointed, please go buy an ipad 2, ok?
In fact, I highly recommend against getting a gtab for most people. I promise, you will not be disappointed with the ipad 2. Love you long time. Go, put the disappointment of a device gtab up on ebay and go out and buy the ipad 2 now, please, before you get any more disappointed.

drum747 said:
Here you go:
Sent from my Calkulinized and Clemsynized OC'd g tablet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice. Xoom owners will hate you for sure.
Thank you and others for posting scores.

Very fast. Always loved Calkulin's ROM, and I've come home after playing with Vegan GB for a while (also a great ROM). It also appears that the OC settings work with pershoot's OC kernel as well. I love the fact that it clocks based on battery life.

@goodintentions
Geez guy, did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? It's not like he posted a long harrasing write up for Gingerbread. It was subtle just like you should be. Chill out please.
On that note does anyone have a video of this "Beast ROM" in action?

Wish I could get this combo running. I have been running C&C 1.1+v9 for awhile now and love it. I can't get any of the OC kernals running. The only way I can get this to boot is to install the C&C OC combo and before booting I have to install Clemsyn's v9 kernal. I can't get Pershoots 1.4 ghz kernel running either.
The best I have gotten was with the C&C combo and then installing Clemsyn's OC Extra kernal and I can get to the HC animated boot screen but it never gets past that. My son and I bought our gtabs the same day and his runs all the OC kernels.. Oh Well...

MechAniX.one said:
@goodintentions
Geez guy, did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? It's not like he posted a long harrasing write up for Gingerbread. It was subtle just like you should be. Chill out please.
On that note does anyone have a video of this "Beast ROM" in action?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More like waking up on the couch. My boy friend got mistaken for a prostitute by some narcissitic asshole the other night and now I'm (a guy like all other guys) taking the blunt.