Hi,
i have a little question.
Which and how many versions of OS exist and which are the differences.
The OS version 5.2.318 is come before or after the 5.2.1413?.
Thanks for your answers.
Good question and should be pinned (if i didn't miss it when i joined)
From what i gather 5.2.1413 is a newer build but had more bugs that these developers in some threads fixed for there roms.
Yep 1413 is a newer build and it also came with the new 2007 version of Office Mobile.
The OS build question has an excellent answer in the second post of this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=316447
Hello everyone,
I have just installed WM6 on my Qtek 9100, with this ROM:
ROM version: 10.2.0.8
ROM date: 2/03/07
Radio Version: 02.19.11
Protocol Version: 4.1.13.09
Now, this is really cool but I thought it had this new Touchflo which I wanted to try...Now here's the question:
Isn't there a cab file or something to install it without having to look for a new ROM, downgrade, install it again and all that stuff? I think it would be useful.
Looking forward to your kind feedback,
Thanks in advance,
Nicolo'
if you want TouchFLO, you must replace touch.dll with a touch.dll compatible with touch flo technology, and this replacing can't be done while the OS running, so it must be edited on the rom you want
Oh, so I have to install it again huh...
Do you know any good room with it inside? Do I have to dowgrade to something special or can I install it like right now?
Thank you so much for you kind and fast feedback
Nicolo'
there are many of TouchFLO roms like:
- TNT 5.0
- NBD 9.1
- Black Diamond 2.0
- See No Evil
go to every rom thread and check out the feedback, but the latest one is the first
for instructions how to get the best steps, check TNT 5.0 instructions
have a good try
Hi,
I picked up a O2 Xda Exec - it came in an O2 branded box - but it seems to have an "unoffical ROM" - the info is as follows:
Windows Mobile 6
OS 5.2.318 (Build 15341.4.2.0)
Processor PXA270-520MHz
Memory 49.11MB
Rom Image Built Dec 31 2006
R.0.00.00
G 42.07.P8
D 2.00.02 PV
There is an application I wanted to run - Ce-Star that when loaded - causes the device to hand on restart. They told me I had an "unofficial ROM" - which lead me here after some Google searches.
I guess I don't really care if I run CE-Star or not - it would be nice - but in any case - I'm interested in ending up with a decent phone configuration - at least a "known one".
Does anyone know what ROM release would result in the above information so I at least know where the phone is "at" now?
Thanks for your help!
Smoge
Yes, it seems that you have an unofficial ROM on the device. It is an older ROM as the newest available ROM is Core 5.2.1921 Build 18521.0.7.0.
If I were you, I'll try some of the ROM's available on this site. Definitely exiting stuff. (And faster than the official WM5 Rom)
smoge said:
Hi,
I picked up a O2 Xda Exec - it came in an O2 branded box - but it seems to have an "unoffical ROM" - the info is as follows:
Windows Mobile 6
OS 5.2.318 (Build 15341.4.2.0)
Processor PXA270-520MHz
Memory 49.11MB
Rom Image Built Dec 31 2006
R.0.00.00
G 42.07.P8
D 2.00.02 PV
There is an application I wanted to run - Ce-Star that when loaded - causes the device to hand on restart. They told me I had an "unofficial ROM" - which lead me here after some Google searches.
I guess I don't really care if I run CE-Star or not - it would be nice - but in any case - I'm interested in ending up with a decent phone configuration - at least a "known one".
Does anyone know what ROM release would result in the above information so I at least know where the phone is "at" now?
Thanks for your help!
Smoge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you don't have a radio rom?
yeah strange !
no radio (R.0.00.00 in your list)
have you tried your telephone function ?
It seems like someone used "Uni_Simlock_by_Buzz_and_team" on your device
If you do this it comes with a none functioning Radio rom version 0.00.00
I think you need to flash at least your radio rom to ie. 1.15 of 1.18
Read the wiki.
http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=HTC_Universal
greetings,
Wout
Im looking for a clean os, preferably CE 5.2.19400 (Build 19199.1.0.0).
I want to have a clean base OS to start adding my fixes, applications and tools. I have tried to disect many of the "vanilla" versions from people, but even their clean versions still include a lot of garbage I dont want and is almost impossible to clean. I would rather start from a totally clean os and build up from there.
Thanks,
jay
I would also like to know this.
further, how can one be sure that a 'clean' os (or any freely downloadable rom for that matter) is free from software that snoops on you, etc?
Here is the 19400 dump
http://www.sendspace.com/file/kdincu
I wonder, is a Hermes dump usable to cook a Wizard ROM?
And you mention, "CE 5.2.19400 (Build 19199.1.0.0).". Is that newer or older than the custom ROMS that are advertised as WM 6.1 build 19209? I mean, does that mean CE 5.2.19209 build xxxxxx or CE 5.2.xxxxx build 19209?
Cheers!
CE 5.2.19400 (Build 19199.1.0.0) means OS from new build, XIP from old build.
However there are some fake ROMs that with modified OS version, this may be the case (Because official 19209 ROM is AKU 1.0.2, how come this ROM is still AKU1.0.0?)
ROMs for other devices can be used in Wizard after porting (at least OS(SYS+OEM) porting must be done). You may use XIP from other Wizard ROMs, but will show your old XIP build in the About screen.
Thanks for the explanation, it's clear now
For example i have CE OS 5.2.19212 (Build 19212.1.0.3)
(Build 19212.1.0.3) = SYS
CE OS 5.2.19212 = OEM
How and why does we change the OEM number?
I noticed ex. Garmins DK2 have CE OS 5.2.20226( BUILD 20226.1.1.1)
How can it be 'CE OS 5.2.20226' ? If latest rom for Kaiser is 19214, meaning the latest OEM for Kaiser that is.
I am NOT implying that chefs on this board fake theyre CE OS build, but if its not legit we don't know what is real anymore. Sorry if the question is a bit blur but I am lost on this one.
they should be all real. It's not an official kaiser build. You are right with the last official kaiser build. The other numbers are ports from other phone roms. Sometimes those builds can even be better than the last official kaiser build, sometimes worse since incompatability. Some people are curious the new things in a new build even if its a port so they want the newest build. Good reason why chefs cook these ported roms. My honest opinion, speed wise, the ports and the latest kaiser official are the same.
well yes we can take dll's from other devices or apps to upgrade but changing the CE OS build?
Meaning, you can't port whole OEM dir! Because device drivers are there, so why change the CE OS build?
I believe the 20226 comes from the Sony Xperia X1 (made by HTC). Laurnetius26 made a statement about this in one of his ROM threads... basically, he said he wanted to experiment with the newest ROMs (not necessarily Kaiser based) to improve the performance of the Kaiser. I believe he starts with entire new ROMs and goes from there (my guess). Dutty used to make his "hybrid" ROMs where he would use parts from different ROMs and use them together. Some chefs just clean up official Kaiser ROMs. Examples of all of these are all over this board.
Well, this i know. But if you study all of Leo`s release you will notice he doesnt use a single CE OS build that is "off".
Meaning he always uses Kaiser officials, that way ie. I have no problem following up on what he uses.
As for the experiment, he just experiments with the dll's not the CE OS number.
the CE OS number comes from MSXIPKernel in XIP. OEM in imgfs has nothing to do with it.
Intresting conversation here.
I'm a noob in this as well.
Question 2 you please, maybe you can explain?
When I port I always use a shipped rom as source (OEM and XIP)
The SYS dir is ported and sometimes I port XIP as well.
How come when I do that the CE OS number is always the shipped source?
Only the (build....) changes, which I think is the SYS dir isn't?
Let's say for example CE OS 5.2.19212 (build 19588).
Are you telling CE OS 5.2.19212 is coming from XIP?
I ported XIP a few times but this number never changed.
Thanks,
Leo
dcd1182 said:
the CE OS number comes from MSXIPKernel in XIP. OEM in imgfs has nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Laurentius26 said:
When I port I always use a shipped rom as source (OEM and XIP)
The SYS dir is ported and sometimes I port XIP as well.
How come when I do that the CE OS number is always the shipped source?
Only the (build....) changes, which I think is the SYS dir isn't?
Let's say for example CE OS 5.2.19212 (build 19588)Are you telling CE OS 5.2.19212 is coming from XIP?
I ported XIP a few times but this number never changed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Leo. Kaiser not my teritory but couldn't resist putting in my 2 cents This indeed is an interesting conversation
The build no is determined by the "d0b41563-b345-4444-aa15-986e7c7fff99.dsm" in OS within SYS
The version is determined by "d92a4f0a-378a-4482-8fd3-bd127a05e4de.dsm" file in XIP (MSXIPKernelTlk)
Now some people hex edit these files to make the ROM look more recent, but an honest developer would use the SYS (may have altered some packs though) and XIP from the different builds and then cook
Laurentius26 said:
Intresting conversation here.
I'm a noob in this as well.
Question 2 you please, maybe you can explain?
When I port I always use a shipped rom as source (OEM and XIP)
The SYS dir is ported and sometimes I port XIP as well.
How come when I do that the CE OS number is always the shipped source?
Only the (build....) changes, which I think is the SYS dir isn't?
Let's say for example CE OS 5.2.19212 (build 19588).
Are you telling CE OS 5.2.19212 is coming from XIP?
I ported XIP a few times but this number never changed.
Thanks,
Leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes the CE OS number comes from the XIP and the build comes from the sys to be more acurate the buld number is in the dsm file in the os folder of sys.
I'm not shure acactly where the XIP number is stored but my guess would be one of the dsm file in the xip folder
gullum said:
Yes the CE OS number comes from the XIP and the build comes from the sys to be more acurate the buld number is in the dsm file in the os folder of sys.
I'm not shure acactly where the XIP number is stored but my guess would be one of the dsm file in the xip folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tag!! Beat you to it brother
Nice to see you here!
So it's just a hack, that's what I was thinking as well.
Thank you for confirming this!
Grtz,
Leo
ababrekar said:
Hey Leo. Kaiser not my teritory but couldn't resist putting in my 2 cents This indeed is an interesting conversation
The build no is determined by the "d0b41563-b345-4444-aa15-986e7c7fff99.dsm" in OS within SYS
The version is determined by "d92a4f0a-378a-4482-8fd3-bd127a05e4de.dsm" file in XIP (MSXIPKernelTlk)
Now some people hex edit these files to make the ROM look more recent, but an honest developer would use the SYS (may have altered some packs though) and XIP from the different builds and then cook
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one reason I havn't moved to the never builds is that they are originaly made for VGA so we need to use (old files) in some cases to get them to work on QVGA phones... this will often cause more problems then it's worth messing with.
This actualy means that even though these 20xxx builds look like they are clean ports they are in fact hybrate builds
Laurentius26 said:
Nice to see you here!
So it's just a hack, that's what I was thinking as well.
Thank you for confirming this!
Grtz,
Leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for more info, read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=2362796&postcount=350
Yeah.. you are talking about the 192 packages to 96 isn't?
Thanks Gullum.
gullum said:
one reason I havn't moved to the never builds is that they are originaly made for VGA so we need to use (old files) in some cases to get them to work on QVGA phones... this will often cause more problems then it's worth messing with.
This actualy means that even though these 20xxx builds look like they are clean ports they are in fact hybrate builds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Laurentius26 said:
Nice to see you here!
So it's just a hack, that's what I was thinking as well.
Thank you for confirming this!
Grtz,
Leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it depends on the cook, if he has chosen to hack the nos or use the correct porting method by which you get the dsm files automatically and it is a true build
htctouchp said:
for more info, read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=2362796&postcount=350
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh right. I forgot to mention your research in this part of the world
Ok so let me get this straight...... using Garmin for an example...
He has his latest ROM as CE OS 20270 and build 20270. He has more and less ported the XIP and SYS folders to achieve this but in reality it is just a hack and not really a true 20270 build???
My thought on the matter is that this number is that...exactly a number!!! I have fully ported the SYS changing the 192 files to 92...and copying over the XIP (that is allowed). Sometimes I would not get the build number to change? Even though I know the files were transfered over as I replaced them.
ryncppr said:
Ok so let me get this straight...... using Garmin for an example...
He has his latest ROM as CE OS 20270 and build 20270. He has more and less ported the XIP and SYS folders to achieve this but in reality it is just a hack and not really a true 20270 build???
My thought on the matter is that this number is that...exactly a number!!! I have fully ported the SYS changing the 192 files to 92...and copying over the XIP (that is allowed). Sometimes I would not get the build number to change? Even though I know the files were transfered over as I replaced them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I mentioned that when cooks port the SYS alongwith the XIP from a different build, they automatically get both the dsm files
Cooks who dont know or dont want to spend time in porting, they would hack and hex edit the nos by way which htctouchp explained in his post
ryncppr said:
Ok so let me get this straight...... using Garmin for an example...
He has his latest ROM as CE OS 20270 and build 20270. He has more and less ported the XIP and SYS folders to achieve this but in reality it is just a hack and not really a true 20270 build???
My thought on the matter is that this number is that...exactly a number!!! I have fully ported the SYS changing the 192 files to 92...and copying over the XIP (that is allowed). Sometimes I would not get the build number to change? Even though I know the files were transfered over as I replaced them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, i do not own a kaiser and am not first hand familiar with garmin's ROM, but i would still have to assume that it is NOT a "hack and not really a true 20270 build"
i would assume that garmin has properly dumped a 20270 ROM, and replaced *DPI_192* with *DPI_96*. he then moved modules into place for kaiser and theres SYS.
a properly ported XIP gets all of MSXIPKernel and MSXIPKernelLTK from the new source (and thus gets the new build number). these packages are not specific to any DPI. the only thing kept from your kaiser original is OEMXIPKernel, which has no effect on CE OS build numbers.
true in this scenario the newer CE OS source has been modified to adjust DPI but it is what i would personally consider a "true" build. gullum said that this can cause problems- i have not seen this in my experience and this is the first i have heard that. gullum can you provide any detail here?
ryncppr, i think you misunderstood here:
ababrekar said:
Now some people hex edit these files to make the ROM look more recent, but an honest developer would use the SYS (may have altered some packs though) and XIP from the different builds and then cook
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think we agree that a "hack" means fake build numbers, achieved by hex editing the dsm's mentioned. i very highly doubt any of the ROMs you see in this forum with well known CE OS numbers are "hacks" of this kind. they achieved that build number by properly bringing over the parts containing it.
i should also mention that in my opinion, purposely faking a MS build by hexedit is bad for our community. it does nothing positive for anyone.
Ok I understand what your saying....And I hope Garmin takes no offense to me using his name it was just the first post I saw with both the CE OS and Build numbers newer!!!
SO I fully understand then....sorry so many questions but this is what XDA-Developers forums should be like...!!!!
WHen I properly port an XIP address I should use M'reloc the check the old folders numbers against the new folders right. A majority of them seem the same but it appears there is only a few folders with different numbers?
i would just like to say that use cooked ROMs only from people whom u trust. better yet, cook a ROM for urself by porting from a shipped ROM rather than using an uploaded kitchen.