Related
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=1420961
this will work in all wm5 I think, hope you like it
you can say to me so that it serves to change pool to wm5 official and who differences it has to put one or another one,thanks.
I have seen that appears pdocwrite in Paradis change pool size,can downgrade spl of 3.08 to 2.20 with pdocwrite and spl 2.20.0001.nb?
no don't do that, wait for me about the SPL I'm in contant with slickdick via mail, wait plz,
It is strange I'm more afraid at your device??????? this might brick your phone
OK.
I have proven the Paradis change pool then size as pda but fast with 4 megas of pool goes or with 12 megas?
I have noticed which using 4 megas of pool I have left of ram 33 and with 12 pool 25 megas, then is but fast using 4 megas of pool?
it will be slow to read the rom, and fast to write to ram, so depends in your need
but 6 mb page pool size will be good, fast enough to read the rom, and have a lot of memory
ok,thanks you
single a question but is worth for one artemis wm5 also?
what did you mean? artemis???
paradis_pal said:
what did you mean? artemis???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry,artemis is htc 3300 with wm5
is it work for HTC himalaya ?
Can anyone give me 16\18 variant ?
try http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=324676 and ask for your device
common medrators, this should be sticky, as this pp changer is for offcial ROMs for prophet
works on my qteck S200 ita
I'm using 6mb pool
good, it should work in all wm5 I think
Do any of these 6.1 Roms have better video performance? camera performance? IE scrolling etc.
I've read a supposed 5 percent increase in performance.
dsellers2 said:
I've read a supposed 5 percent increase in performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe Alex's posted a cab in his wiki that helps improve performance. I would check there for it.
ray6 said:
Do any of these 6.1 Roms have better video performance? camera performance? IE scrolling etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard that IE scrolling is better...but I use this cab to solve that issue.
ray6 said:
Do any of these 6.1 Roms have better video performance? camera performance? IE scrolling etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see a lot of improvement in video performance & camera performance - and battery drain (never seen those low numbers before)
taiseer999 said:
I see a lot of improvement in video performance & camera performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah...try this!!!!
taiseer999 said:
I see a lot of improvement in battery drain (never seen those low numbers before)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check my post in the Wiki or in my signature on battery Drain. Dutty's BETA version got the highest marks. Over 100 more min of operational time.
alltheway said:
Oh yeah...try this!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already have tried it yesterday with Schap's, but the new ROM; you won't need it, things are a lot better than before (using the default wm player)
taiseer999 said:
I already have tried it yesterday with Schap's, but the new ROM; you won't need it, things are a lot better than before (using the default wm player)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Roger that. I am checking it with CorePlayer! Oh yeah!
What tool do you use to gauge the The estimated Battery life, I am using batterystatus and getting 83ma with backlight lit. and 59ma; backlight half lit
note (power management is altered via schap's confg tool)
taiseer999 said:
What tool do you use to gauge the The estimated Battery life, I am using batterystatus and getting 95ma with backlight lit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BattBench
http://www.freewarepocketpc.net/ppc-download-battbench-net-1-00.html
alltheway said:
BattBench
http://www.freewarepocketpc.net/ppc-download-battbench-net-1-00.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alltheway which settings you did? which % and the duration of the test? Thanks in advance.
D3D
This is what I found on the Vodafone ROM!
Driver info:
Ordinal: 0
Name: d3dmref.dll
Description: Microsoft
Direct3D Mobile Reference Driver version: 222101509.67086
alltheway said:
Oh yeah...try this!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That cab won't do anything. The 5% increase should be due to the changes to QTV.DLL, which was put into Panosha's 6.0 ROM and I wasn't sure where to get it until now... It's already in WM6.1
alltheway said:
Oh yeah...try this!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's this cab for?
_Alex_ said:
That cab won't do anything. The 5% increase should be due to the changes to QTV.DLL, which was put into Panosha's 6.0 ROM and I wasn't sure where to get it until now... It's already in WM6.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL damn Alex,
Let me feel important
Augusto Moura said:
alltheway which settings you did? which % and the duration of the test? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn the brightness down to 3 and then ran the test at 3% 5 times...to get an average
Video playback is definitely improved in Wm 6.1..
Using Coreplayer 1.1.1
Video Encoded in 320x240 DivX 768 Kbps and Audio mp3 192 Kbps 48 KHz.
Source: 720p HDTV music video.
Encoded File Size: 28.5 MB
Mode: RAW Framebuffer.
Quality: High
Diether: ON
Dutty's DualTouch v1.0 (default settings): 153%
WM 6.1 HTC Official: 174%
WoooooooHoooooooo !!!!!
WOW... D3D.... driver...!!!
Laurentius26 said:
This is what I found on the Vodafone ROM!
Driver info:
Ordinal: 0
Name: d3dmref.dll
Description: Microsoft
Direct3D Mobile Reference Driver version: 222101509.67086
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi..
did you have time to try this yet? can we get more info. pease...
Thank you.
alltheway said:
Oh yeah...try this!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya, that Alex cab is the same ati dll that's been going around and proven to do absolutely nothing. Especially if you just delete it and also not bother building it into the rom since it's never used.
I would like to ask as to what would be the optimal size for each partition size, especially for linux-swap. I've looked through many threads, and some have said that 32MB would be the best, but others say that the higher it is, the better. Could anyone help to clarify?
Thanks in advance!
usually around 500mb for the second partition, and either 32, 64, or 96 for the linux swap. depends on the hero rom lol.
Hmm alright then. Thanks! =D
what about swap partition VS swap file like on (droidswap)? I can't seem to hve droid swap automatically start up upon restart tho
I had read that Eclair could only access 256MB of the Cappy's system memory and that Froyo was going to be able to access all 512MB.
But I'm still seeing 80MB free after flashing to Froyo same as 2.1.
And the problem of diminishing memory is still occurring after the phone has been sitting idle overnight I'll wake it and have like 60MB free or once even worse w/ 25MB free.
Using Ultimate Juice, Adv.Task Killer And Titanium Backup(froze many unnecessary apps), but still horrible memory management on the part of Android. I was hoping Froyo was going to be better.
suprsidr said:
I had read that Eclair could only access 256MB of the Cappy's system memory and that Froyo was going to be able to access all 512MB.
But I'm still seeing 80MB free after flashing to Froyo same as 2.1.
And the problem of diminishing memory is still occurring after the phone has been sitting idle overnight I'll wake it and have like 60MB free or once even worse w/ 25MB free.
Using Ultimate Juice, Adv.Task Killer And Titanium Backup(froze many unnecessary apps), but still horrible memory management on the part of Android. I was hoping Froyo was going to be better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was a test release, and it was a bad buggy one at that. I wouldn't put too much value in it. I would also expect that we will have more than one "official" Froyo release as it continues to get tweaked.
I was seeing 304 Mb TOTAL, of which < 130Mb was available in task manager. More than 256Mb, but still not the 512Mb expected in 2.2.
Yeah, about 300 is available with Eclair, not 256.
Let's get over it. You will NEVER see all 512MB in Galaxy S. Samsung happens to count the shared video memory (128MB) as the total RAM which technically is correct but that video memory will never be counted by OS because you can't load programs into it.
foxbat121 said:
Let's get over it. You will NEVER see all 512MB in Galaxy S. Samsung happens to count the shared video memory (128MB) as the total RAM which technically is correct but that video memory will never be counted by OS because you can't load programs into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we are seeing 304 mb then we should be seeing 384 mb
tjsooley said:
we are seeing 304 mb then we should be seeing 384 mb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other things also need ram such as the cellular radio.
And os.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
This thread in the I9000 forum goes into detail.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=792512&highlight=512mb
Basically theres a rather large "blackhole" of ram that is reserved for an unknown purpose. Some say graphics, some even say its a bad part of the chip that Samsung covers up. Nobody knows for certain. HIGHMEM support is supposedly already enabled even in 2.1 builds. Our only hope is that Samsung gets their act together and fixes it.
ThisWasATriumph said:
This thread in the I9000 forum goes into detail.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=792512&highlight=512mb
Our only hope is that Samsung gets their act together and fixes it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I hope not!
Sent from my Samsung-SGH-I897 using voice talk
It looks like KJ3 ROM on captivate uses more RAM that KH3. To confirm this can I reuest guys to post their RAM usage for KH, KI and all KJ versions. Please use TaskManager to clear memory and note the base RAM......it may not be accurate but will give an idea. In my experience KH3 runs around 170 MB and KJ3 is at 230 MB.
Thanks for any input
im on a kj3 rom using about 230 myself.
RAM in android is SUPPOSED to be used... free RAM is wasted RAM.
studacris said:
RAM in android is SUPPOSED to be used... free RAM is wasted RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only true if the ram is taken by cache not some unknow process/bloatware.
erbsmokah said:
im on a kj3 rom using about 230 myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, erbsmokah for your input.
studacris said:
RAM in android is SUPPOSED to be used... free RAM is wasted RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but if you follow peoples comments on KJ3, like I am doing, KJ3 is using a much larger RAM amount, AND when further customized by adding apps, live wallpapers etc, is actually SLOWING the phone considerably. This making the phone real sluggish........which is new for a android ROM......??
EDIT: would you mind sharing your ROM and RAM?
arda99 said:
only true if the ram is taken by cache not some unknow process/bloatware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with this especially on the KJ3......Something is different in what is running in the background, and I hope I can investigate if this turns out to be true for other people.
I agree and went back to fatsy ki rom and it stays faster longer without lag.
I also monitor free ram and once it gets below 40, it lags badly, over 50 it flies.
I think this phone really needed 1 gig like the gs2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
electroau said:
I think this phone really needed 1 gig like the gs2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, if the captivate had more ram, I'd still be using it.
Simba501 said:
+1, if the captivate had more ram, I'd still be using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I myself am willing to agree..........if this RAM usage is a consensus on KJ3 then maybe the cappy is reaching its last usable ROM update? This is important to know......
EDIT: Of course, since this a leak release, then ATT/Samsung are fooling around with this build........., and maybe come back to normal on next leak ?? As a captivate owner, I would like to know what life my phone has as a "advanced" device........
chappatti said:
Yes, but if you follow peoples comments on KJ3, like I am doing, KJ3 is using a much larger RAM amount, AND when further customized by adding apps, live wallpapers etc, is actually SLOWING the phone considerably. This making the phone real sluggish........which is new for a android ROM......??
EDIT: would you mind sharing your ROM and RAM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fusion x beta kj3 267mb Ram used ATM. But no lag whatsoever.
If you find that the ram does get bogged down just on this firmware version then perhaps the lmk settings in the kernel aren't as aggressive, which would be easily fixed by SOURCE CODE.
studacris said:
Fusion x beta kj3 267mb Ram used ATM. But no lag whatsoever.
If you find that the ram does get bogged down just on this firmware version then perhaps the lmk settings in the kernel aren't as aggressive, which would be easily fixed by SOURCE CODE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point well taken........
But due you expect LMK to let ~100 MB slip by? It seems a little too much, since the limit on cappy is about 370 (usable). I would think we so much consumption LMK would kick in earlier?????
My KJ3 is using 227 MB. Free memory is ~50 MB. It lags significantly at times. However, I used Auto Memory Manager and set the Android internal task killer to "aggressive" and it keeps ~100 MB free an there is not lag at all now. I haven't noticed (yet) that apps get killed prematurely, which could be an issue with this setting. I'm using the Samurai 1.2 kernel overclocked to 1.252 GHz (no Voodoo lag fix). Other than the occasional black screen on the Gallery, my Captivate has been running pretty fast and seems to have as good a battery life as I remember ever having.
Edit #1: I don't think Auto Memory Manager is needed with Samurai 1.2. This kernel is tweaked already. I set Auto Memory Manager back to default settings, uninstalled it, then re-installed the kernel.
Here's another tip, move all of your apps from the internal SD card to phone memory. Having them on the SD card cause significant lag, crashing, and rebooting for me.
Edit #2: I switched to Pinnacle 1.3 with the latest Boog's kernel, and my KH3 is using 329 MB (the same as KJ3 I was using before (I must have made a typo above when I claimed 227 MB on KJ3 (I verified this before I switched to KH3/Pinnacle)). What governs how much RAM is used? Does it really make any difference? Free memory makes a huge difference in lag, however.
On latest MIUI and i have ~200 MBs of free memory!
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Surely not that much... M on miui too n the lowest I get is 80,otherwise I am up there at 130ish... But then I have a crapload of services in the background. But yes, I do get 200 when I clear memory.
Sent from my cell phone. DUH