Related
:!: Sorry for the shameless attempt to get you here with a dreamy subject but it's relevant to the topic - honestly. :!:
I'm after a PDAPhone with built in everything. But looks so far like I'm going to have to compromise and get an external GPS receiver, however was just hoping someone might have a little gem that I couldn't find anywhere else in the forums.
I have owned and loved the O2 XDA range ever since my first XDA years ago and have since lugged around an XDAII. I damaged my II recently and have a nice cheque for £550 burning a hole in my pocket courtesy of the insurance company. This means that for the first time ever I don't need to go to a subsidised model. My initial thought was that I'd stump up a few extra quid and get a JamJar :lol: from expansys but now I'm a bit more mature I decided to check out the options first.
So far I've found (Ignoring Naming Variations):
Prices quoted are from expansys - they could be cheaper elsewhere. Pls let me know if you find any (UK Only though)
:arrow: iPAQ hw6515 - Looks a bit crap, small screen and no wi-fi listed but DOES have GPS & 1.3Mp Cam - Anyone know of any Square Aware issues with programs?
:idea: http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=120563
:idea: £439.95
:arrow: i-mate JAM - Small and sexy but no Wi-Fi and no GPS but would stop people asking if I've got a brick taped to my head. + 1.3Mp, COuld afford external GPS with this one.
:idea: http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=I-MATE_JAM
:idea: £359.95
:arrow:Qtek 9090- Has everything But GPS but would leave enough money for a BT GPS - No camera spec but I think it's 0.3Mp like the XDAIIs - Could be upgraded to WM5, My Mate has one and the Thumb Keyboard is easy to use whilst walking - If I use my head not my geekometer this is my favourite.
:idea: http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=QTEK_9090
:idea: £414.95
:arrow: i-mate JASJAR - Dogs balls but still no GPS and not much more than the 9090 + v Expensive & Getting Bigger - 1.3Mp Cam I think. (I have no 3G service anywhere near me so that's not a bonus) I really like the 3.5mm Jack - Overall a severe number of geek points! NO CRADLE Still needs GPS Seperate, not sure how useable while walking the keyboard will be. I really want one.
:idea: http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=119353
:idea: £669.95
:arrow: i-mate K-JAM - WiFi, BT etc, Smaller and lighter than Universal, WM5, 1.3Mp. I like the keyboard. Maybe my new best choice. JUST leaves enough money to think about an external GPS. Thanks JamiJam
:idea: http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125518
:idea: £504.95
My criteria to consider are as follows, argue with them and persuade me otherwise with reasons if you so wish:
Phone + PDA Essential (Tri Band+)
Camera - Prefer 1+Mp
BT - Must Have
Wi-Fi - Optional but Preferred a lot
3G - Not required
Keyboard - Like to Have (It's awkward using handwriting when travelling)
GPS - Very Nice to Have I Drive a lot and would like to use TT in the future.
OS - Not Bothered, these can be changed
I have 1 Month to decide before I burst and spray money all over the place so I'd really appreciate any comments you might have.
Don't go off on any obscure tangents though please, post them in a new topic and link to it if you wish.
Wizard...
(aka K-Jam, aka Qtek 9100)
Not sure when it will be out but Orange are going to release the Wizard and call it the SPV M600. If you can wait then you'll have it subsidised. :wink:
hmmmmm
Ok, so far the Wizard is my favourite now. I'd completely forgotten about that. What's the keyboard like though? I'm not too fussed about the size (the one on the XDA III is smaller and still useable)? It's more the key action I'm bothered about.
Does it have those rubbish 'rubbery' 'spectrum' style keys? It looks like it does.
I'm still yearning for a Universal cos none of my mates will have one but my head is still saying I don't need it and one of the others will do everything I want.
AFAIK HTC has some kind of arrangement with compaq - HTC will not make a phone with GPS as it competes with a model HTC makes for compaq that does have GPS or something like that (the hw6515 maybe ?)
I have a Blue Angel (O2 XDA IIs) and it does all of this.
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=I-MATE_III
WM5 now available and working fine on it.
It has a keyboard too, it's those blister things (more like a ZX81 than a spectrum) but it is useable, although the keyboard layout is a bit ****e.
What with the newer models coming out you should be able to pick one up cheapish.
I run mine with a Globalsat Bt-338 Bluetooth GPS and Tomtom 5
oh, and FYI, this PDA holder from halfords holds the BA perfectly and can be mounted to your dash. It obscures no ports.
(The pic is upside down BTW)
http://www.halfords.com/opd_product_details.asp?id=16600&type=0&cat=397
The keyboard on the wizard is excellent, in my humble opinion!
It also snaps in and out in a way that makes you feel it won't break down easily.
Finally, it automatically turns the phone's display into landscape mode, which is very handy.
Wizard or BA
I have to say I'm still impressed with the Wizard. Just made a scale model out of card (how sad is that) and it's tiny!
I like the BA but if the keyboard doesn't let the Wizard down I think it'll be my PDA of choice. The one thing I really didn't like about the Jam was its lack of Wi-Fi and that's solved in the K-Jam.
I assume the screen's readable, I like to think that I'll have good eyesight for a couple of years yet so I don't think the size will be an issue.
iPaq HW6515
I have tried without success to get details of the built-in GPS. The one authoritative source to whom I spoke was scathing about its performance. So whatever you do choose, I do not recommend the iPaq.
On a separate note I saw my first Jasjar close up today. It is lighter than you might think, but heavier than is reasonable for prolonged use as a phone. A bluetooth earpiece was being used that included a display for caller ID. As a data device it is pretty impressive.
I too run a GlobalSat BT-338 GPS, in my case with Mapopolis.
if you are going GPS, make sure it is SIRFstar III chipset (the current latest-and-greatest), especially if you live in a city as they are really good at "urban canyon" reception.
I have seen new BT-338s on ebay for £65 "buy it now" recently
plus another thing to think about...
a seperate BT GPS unit has various advantages:
1) Battery
It won't drain your PPC battery when operating, except the charge needed to communicate via BT.
2) Upgrading
If a new improved GPS unit comes out and you have an onboard GPS unit, you are carrying useless baggage and can't sell the old one.
Also bear in mind there will likely be new features added to GPS units.
one example: digital compass. At the moment, if you stand still and rotate, a GPS unit has no clue which way you are facing until you move. A GPS does already transmit heading AFAIK - it works out which way you are facing by assiming you are looking in the direction of travel. Integration of a digital compass therefore would probably require no changes to the protocol. This does exist ( see http://www.xemics.com/internet/solutions/compass.jsp?productID=108 )
3) Switching.
BT GPS units work on laptopss too you know
4) Safety. I use my GPS for a sport called mountain boarding. Same kinda deal as downhill mountain biking, I trace a route I have done using GPS software. I ride with my XDA in a reinforced case with foam in, but find the GPS reception suffers, so I keep the BT GPS unit in my bag and the XDA in the case.
Seeing as the XDA is MUCH more valuable than the GPS this makes sense.
5) Reception versus viewing position.
Sometimes the position with best reception is not the same as the position you can see the screen of your PPC best.
????
Good point.
Ok, more questions on the K-Jam
Camera: Says 1.3/2 Is this 1.3 with software to 'frig' it to 2?
Keyboard: Is the expansys keyboard silver ( http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125518 ) or black ( http://www.expansys.com/zoompic.asp?type=item&code=125518 )
Silver ones look plastic whereas black ones look rubbery. Which have you got JamiJam? Is it from Expansys?
Processor: 200Mhz? Is that right? Seems quite a drop. Do you have any problems with media playback? I remember my XDA I used to have a problem playing big avi files.
Ta Very Much
Camera is 1.3MP, and it is ****.
Yes, it's better than the Magician, but it's still pretty bad. I wouldn't buy the Wizard hoping to use the camera for anything useful. In my opinion this is the #1 point on which HTC is lacking. They've worked on everything else, now they need to start putting decent cameras in these devices.
I have the silver keyboard and I bought my Wizard in a store. I believe that if you order from expansys you'll get a silver one.
Processor is 200MHz (different CPU architecture) but it seems to be on par with the Magician in practice, maybe 10% slower. So yes, you should be able to watch full screen movies, once you find a bit-rate/resolution/format that works for you. Not sure which XDA you had, but I would expect similar ballpark performance.
Hope this helps.
Ta
The 'performance lacking' XDA was the original XDA I and I'll take your word for it that performance is ok. I don't use it for anything too hot and my XDA II never had a problem with films.
To be honest, every camera phone I've had from the XDA Range was ****ty quality (Very grainy) but I spend a fair bit of time on site collecting info on wagons and stuff for my job and it's always handy to be able to snap a quick video or pic of something. The only reason I want a higher res is so that when some tit with a Sony Ericson goes on about his 2Mp camera I don't loose too many 'top trumps' points. I never print the pics and my main contract doesn't support GPRS so I don't often send MMS. You'd be surprised how easily you can still get by with just plain old WAP.
Good news on the silver buttons. I prefer them. Has anyone bought one from Expansys who can verify?
Sweetness & Joy
Just thought I'd post my decision for those of you who like seing things through to a conclusion.
After much ponderation and constructing various cardboard models I have decided on the HTC Wizard, purchased from expansys (i-Mate K-Jam). There's a delay on delivery at the moment (3 Days!!!! I can't wait) but once it arrives I'll post back with my oppinions.
I've also heard that my mate is buying the JasJar so I'll be able to make a comparison and post it back.
***************************
:!: Come on Friday! :!:
***************************
D'oh! Just a note not say the expansys delivery has been put back but they've dropped the price too.
***************************
:!: Come on Some-Day! :!:
***************************
Just been looking at some larger photos of the buttons
http://forum.xda-developers.com/files/keyboard-flash.jpg
I take back my spectrum comments, they look pretty good.
Hurrah!
Ok! I've got my Wizard at last. I ended up buying the Qtek 9100 rather than the K-Jam. Looks like I'll miss out on Club i-Mate. :-(
Thought I'd post my views on the phone here just to give closure to anyone reading this thread.
The screen is very sharp. Everything obviously is smaller because the pixels are closer together but the overall effect is a very good screen. The guy in our office with really bad eyesight liked it and he's normally a miserable git when it comes to gadgets.
I take back my comments about the keyboard, it looks fantastic, the action is really great and you can use it to type replies to text messages on the move, which is something I've always struggled with before using the Transcriber. People are also really impressed when the screen rotates thru' to landscape.
I've used it for playing some music and although the speakers built in are tinny as you'd expect, the headphones are really good. I don't know if they'd be the same for the i-Mate but they fit comfortably in my ears and have a very good sound compared to the old XDA & XDA II headphones (Not that that would be hard)!
I miss having a cradle. It was nice to be able to display your phone on your desk while it was charging. Just using a USB cable makes it all feel a bit less sexy as an experience but then you can't have everything I suppose.
The coolest thing I found was the Stylus. It's about 50mm long when it first comes out of the phone. Then you give it a little pull and it extends to... hold on let me get a ruler... 85mm. It's not as comfy to use as the XDA/XDA II styli but since i haven't used it for writing much it doesn't matter. The keyboard is so easy to pull out and use that I've only really used the stylus to point at stuff so that my fingers don't get the screen dirty. The softkeys in WM 2005 also mean that you rarely need to touch the screen.
It's a bit chunkier than I expected but still not big. It's only marginally bigger than my girlfriends Nokia 6230 and compared to an older XDA model it feels like it's tiny!
Voice recognition button on the side works really well so far. I've got about 10 contacts programmed in and it seems to be picking them up ok, even in the car.
Overall, i'm yet to find much of a fault with it. I'll try to get some piccies of bits posted sometime next week.
Feel free to ask any questions.
JASJAR II
When the damn thing releases.....of course
I really wouldnt auction my spare kidney and buy it, and then suffer with a RAM deficit! My xda 2 currently running on wm5, has 128megs ram and 32megs rom....compared to 43megs ram & rom of jasjar........one word.......RIDICULOUS!
i cant believe seeing a 7MB RAM free on a device, and i dont ever want to see it! HTC/ IMATE/ Whoever claim they put in less RAM for extended battery life....bucket of crap! I really dont care for those couple extra hours that i'd probably get, and i dont mind carrying a spare battery or a charger wherever i go....
Its a handicap which is BIG! Besides this, the Jasjar is divinely irresistable, and i cant stop oggling at it :shock:
So, i guess i'll wait for a JJ II to come out with same form factor, and somemore ram which would make the device practical....
HTC do you hear me??????
San
weeel
:shock:
RAM isn't everything. I have been using the device for a day now (Non-stop), often running WMP10, Outlook, PIE etc also playing Tomb Raider. I haven't noticed any diference between this and my XDA II which had I think 64Mb and a 400 odd MHz processor. The odd app is a trifle slow to load up but nothing more major than that.
If the battery life sacrifice is true, then it's not for this little puppy. All this usage (with wi-fi on but not actually using a wi-fi network) and the battery didn't drop below 60% yesterday (Using lightly whilst at work and heavily in the evening. I even synced using bluetooth).
Memory has crept down to 1Mb program mem free at times but I assume windows is just doing its thing because this comes back up after a while and I don't notice any drop in performance.
Re: Hurrah!
eayuwna said:
I miss having a cradle. It was nice to be able to display your phone on your desk while it was charging. Just using a USB cable makes it all feel a bit less sexy as an experience but then you can't have everything I suppose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This site: http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/product/5735.htm claims that this desktop charger/cradle is compatible with the K-Jam so if that's true then it should be OK for your QTek. 8)
Hey there folks! My first post here!
I've just bought the XDA Trion (I made the (blind) assumption it had built in GPS).
Of course later, I found out it hadn't!
I've also found that I seldom use the hard keyboard - I find it quicker to tap the software keyboard with the stylus.
Now I'm looking at changing it for the Orbit. I've compared specs on www.gsmarena.com and the only difference (apart from the Orbit not having 3G but having GPS instead) is that the processor speed is slower - 200MHz.
Now, how much will the slower processor speed of the Orbit effect day to day running of the device?
I tried playing a short AVI file (MJPG, 640x480 @30.00fps - 14552Kbps) and this was very choppy on the Trion. So if I can't really play video files on the Trion (without perhaps having to recompress files) then I probably may as well go for the XDA Orbit. What real benifits do I get from an extra 200MHz apart from opening up software a little quicker?
The other thing is to buy a bluetooth GPS receiver for the Trion (£22 on eBay), although this means, extra baggage and power. The reviews I've read also seem to show Orbit's GPS capabilities on par (and sometimes better) than bluetooth counterparts.
What to do!! Any advice will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Orbit or trion
I have the same problem trying to weigh up the benefits of the 400 processor against the 200.
What are the other functions like?
Neil
Trion or Orbit
I haven't had an xda since the XDA2, and have been using a nokia phone with Bluetooth GPS. Tried the orbit yesterday, and will probably buy. I want a single device basic camera, phone GPS. I hardly ever used the keyboard.
Is there an unlock for the orbit so i can use on vodafone?
Mr.G
The only other difference I forgot to mention was the camera. The Trion has flash and macro mode. But this is neither here or there for me.
Still confused as to what to buy. Will go to O2 store at lunch and see what they say (not much I guess).
My guess is that because the 200MHz Texas Instruments processor is found in quite a few devices it can't be all that bad...
One thing I've read is that 400MHz works better with Bluetooth stereo headsets - but frankly, this doesn't really bother me!
Anyone out there who can tell me the "real world" benifits of a 400MHz Samsung processor over a 200MHz Texas Instrument?!
Anything will be of great help!
SG
Just come back from the O2 shop...
Put their Orbit and my Trion side by side and ran a few tests. You do notice the speed of the Trion - although it's not that great or crucial.
Eg, I took a photo on both devices and zoomed in 3 times - the Orbit zoomed in slower than the Trion by about 1-2 seconds. Moving the zoomed image with the stylus seemed the same on both devices - move the image fast and both devices have lag.
The Orbit is much lighter and thinner than the Trion. The speed thing in my opinion seems superficial - yes things may be a little smoother on the Trion but unless someone tells me THIS (or THAT) program will only run on the Trion and not the Orbit then I think I'm inclined to swap...
Neil, this is my first pocket "smart" phone so I wouldn't know how to compare functions.
All functions seem to work ok but I do have a few niggles:
1. I can't find a way to actually close programs other than go to settings and ending programs manually. Clicking the "X" just seems to "minimise" the application.
2. The wifi is bugging me. There are quite a few wifi signals in my area but I can't find a way to get the Trion just to fix to my wifi and ignore all other connections. It seems to continually search and connect to someone elses wifi!
3. The styus is quite hard to take out - feels like I may break it!
SG
Okay, I've had a look at a few GPS systems and what processor speeds/memory they use:
Cartrek 400S: CPU 266MHz, 32MB RAM, 16 Channels (3.5" 320x240 pxl) - £165
TomTom One Regional: CPU 266MHz, 32MB RAM (3.5" 320x240 pxl) - £180
TomTom Go 510 : CPU 400MHz, 64MB RAM (4.0" 480x272 pxl) - £270
TomTom Go 910 : CPU 400MHz, 64MB RAM (4.0" 480x272 pxl) - £350
compared with -
O2 XDA ORBIT: CPU 200MHz, 64MB RAM, 20 Channel GPS (2.8" 320x240 pxl)
I couldn't find any info on how many channels TomTom's GPS use.
Looking at the above, the cheapest stand-alone GPS system uses a 266MHz processor. Just slightly faster than the Orbit. Has anyone had any issues with using GPS on the orbit? The Orbit does house twice the RAM however.
The slower processor speed of the Orbit makes me wonder how well third party navigation software will work on it...
SG
If you're not bothered about having a keyboard, go for the Orbit. Although I haven't used one, I am using a Trion and I had a Mini S before that, which has a similar processor to the Orbit. The speed increase in the Trion is barely noticeable.
I have avoided the Orbit as I deem a keyboard vital. As you don't however, the Orbit is thinner and has integrated GPS, so go for it!
Cheers HPJ, I think you're right. I guess if it lasts 18 months without being completely outdated and slow, it's the one to go with.
SG
Video HERE of the orbit running TomTom 6
Runs very smooth and fast on my orbit
You're right, it does seem to run quite smooth. Although the video doesn't show the full operation of the GPS.
Think i've made my mind up - going to call O2 next week and swap my Trion for the Orbit.
Thanks for the help people!
No body has really shown any benifits of the Trion apart from the keyboard...
When you get the orbit be sure to register over at xda-orbit.com
Plenty of usefull info there
Very close to getting one myself now, and sodding the keyboard.
Just received my second Trion as the last one's battery lasted max 50 hours (with very little usage etc etc.).....
Anyway, that's a whole different thread........
Cheers for the advice Jamin ...!
That's a good site.
Go for it, after messing around with the Orbit.. the Trion is way too bulky...
and why not the trinity, same as the trion but with working gps and no keyboard, and it's cheaper!
Trinity?
Is the Trinity the Orange SPV M700 (HTC P3600)?
If it is, i've just checked it's spec and you're right. Not only that, it uses the Samsung 400MHz processor and is 3G.
I don't like the fact that it is white however, it feels more bulkier than the Orbit too...
What other network is this on?
I've got very good deal with O2 so I think I'll stick with them...
Is the Trinity the Orange SPV M700 (HTC P3600)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it is
What other network is this on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
none in England (I'm guessing you're here)
I don't like the fact that it is white however, it feels more bulkier than the Orbit too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is available in black, though apparently rarer, and it is a little bulkier, 1.7mm thicker than the orbit ( i could live with that ) the other dimensions are the same
I've got very good deal with O2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
glad you do, they are i believe the most expensive company in the UK. compare them (and their data charges ) to t-mobile and their flext tariffs
bbobeckyj, what phone do you have?
I think Orange only sell it in white...
You've thrown a little spanner into what to go with now!
PS, I am in England!
i have a wizard and i'm trying to decide on the hermes (on t-mo) or trinity (on orange )
i'll see if i can threaten to leave o2 (who i'm currently with untill august) to see if they'll give me a free hermes on a better tariff than they normally do
bbobeckyj said:
and why not the trinity, same as the trion but with working gps and no keyboard, and it's cheaper!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by "working GPS" ??!
Are you implying the Orbit's GPS doesn't work properly?
I was amazed to find that this wasn't already discussed.
Trinity looks like it might be faster, which is a big plus as my XDA mini always chugged along a little too slow.
Extra camera
But the Artemis is slimmer
Can install GPS on both equally well?
Any opinions?
http://www.htc.com/product/03-product_compare_pda.htm
compared here
trinity have
HSDPA/UMTS
and
GPS from the start
The XDA Orbit (o2 customised artemis) is a much nicer design than the plastic looking finger-print hungry Trinity.
Trinity has better CPU and 3G
Artemis has better GPS chip (SirfStar III, and yes it is MUCH better, I have sat the two devices next to eachother and the Artemis is far more accurate) and has FM radio (Big whoop.....)
IMHO the better design and better GPS chip more than makes up for the slower CPU and I don't use 3G anyway.
and artemis have microSD and trinity have miniSD
miniSD seem to be on the way out before it became very popular
though there are converters like kingson who have microSD's with conveters so they act as normal SD or miniSD though not sure about compatibility
Artemis was the daughter of Zeus.... Trinity is GOD... so who win ?
Hehe, well if you look at it like that......
So far quite close
Thanks for the info. Definitely good to know the Orbit has better GPS. I was leaning towards the trinity due to faster processor until you pointed that out. Gonna wait for a few more comments before I decide.
trinity gps works well as p3300 processor, I don't think u found difference in a normal street navigation... maybe just the cold boot is more longer but trinity do well this job Of course if u need a pda mostly for GPS maybe p3300 is better... Sirf is very good chip and OMAP have less consumation... but for all other trinity is much better... fast internet connection, fast processor, video call, mini-sd hot swap instead microsd under battery(weird!!), Irda, D-Pad classic with scrollwheel instead the trackball of p3300 (i think it's not very usefull) just my opinion
I considered the Trion (TyTn), Orbit (p3300) and the SPV M700 (p3600).
I had the Trion but I gave it back and got the Orbit which I'm very happy with. I was looking at the p3600 but it comes in a horrible white colour and in my opinion is the worst looking of the three.
The way I see it is, there are already new smart phones coming out with CPU speeds greater than 400Mhz, some even with a dedicated GPU. At the moment, the Orbit has all I need from it and should last me 18 months. If after this period, new software and developments demand higher CPU speeds, my contract would have finished and I'll get something new. By this time, advancement in smart phone technology would probably mean that the standard CPU speed is more like 600Mhz or so. If by this time the Orbit becomes an antique, I'm sure it would still work well as a sat nav system!
p3600 (trinity)
comes in both black and white flavour
http://www.htcitalia.net/public/minfoto/298.jpg
personaly i pref the white though
and Artemis (orbit) looks much better irl then the forum picture
but i would never buy a new non umts phone
gprs is too slow to borther using the internet from the device
What are the main differences between Polaris(Touch Cruise) and Trinity(P3600) or even P3600i (faster but only available in Australia I think)?
If Trinity is updated to WM6 , what about the GPS chip ?
The P3600 has everything I'm looking for except a good GPS...that is why I was ready to buy the P3600 i (Dopod CHT 9110)(boosted version with more memory (256Mb Flash Rom) and faster processor(500 MHz)+ updated ROM and WM6)
I suppose I could have relaced wm6 uk with a wm6 in french but even that was no so important.
So maybe I better wait a few days for the Polaris (Touch Cruise) announced here in Belgium ?(although 400 Mhz... I would have prefered a faster processor like the 500 MHz from the P3600i...
As I know: HTC Polaris - HTC Trinity
Double ROM and RAM.
New GPS chipset with AGPS compatibility.
Radio FM.
APN 3Mpx.
Flush fitted screen for TouchFlo technology.
Dpad + Wheel.
New software packages.
cedel said:
The P3600 has everything I'm looking for except a good GPS...that is why I was ready to buy the P3600 i (Dopod CHT 9110)(boosted version with more memory (256Mb Flash Rom) and faster processor(500 MHz)+ updated ROM and WM6)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If GPS is in first priority for you, i have to inform you that GPS of Cruise is not the best in market. (A Sirf Star III chipset is far away better!) At least that's what the reviews from owners say!
as far as i know trinity had worse gps then aramis and polaris got better yet not to be compared with real gps recievers though
Rudegar said:
as far as i know trinity had worse gps then aramis and polaris got better yet not to be compared with real gps recievers though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...or not with ETEN GPS phones.
cant argue taste imho ETEN are eyesores
Rudegar said:
cant argue taste imho ETEN are eyesores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idk but for gps i find the athena is the best. i put it by tomtom units and its very close and also around my area always has loads of satellites. i use it as a gps always.
edit: i hope polaris will be close to athena since the technology is there.
I second that
I just finished a nice road test of about 20-miles around my area. I installed the latest TomTom Navigator software on the Polaris and used a Garmin C550 and a Garmin 60Csx as comparisons. All three were pretty close to each other in time to locations, speed reading, and logic behind re-routing. For a hand-held device, I am quite happy with it getting me within feet of where I need to be.
Hope that helps -
I have owned the 3300, 3600 and now Polaris. The polaris is the best. More memory, seems snappier, GPS is great (With good software, I prefer iGo). My main beef with the 3600 was the screen is inset. I tend to use the thumb for navigation a lot and found it hard to navigate. This is probably a person preference.
My wife now has the 3300 and loves it. It is a slower, and has less memory, but lives up to its specifications in every way. Also, for some reason the design feels great in the hand.
I really like the Polaris. The flat screen makes it great for thumb driving the interface. I also like the dpad scroll wheel.
If I had one critisim, I wish it had more hardware buttons similar to the 3300. I like to wire my frequently used buttons for quick access. However, AE Button is a good solution. You can resign hardware buttons based on Single click, double click, triple click, and HOLD. So one button can respond in 4 ways.
I currently have a Blue Angel and I'm considering upgrading to an Orbit 2.
How would the performance compare between the 2? They're both 400MHz, but I just wondered how the Qualcomm is compared to the XScale?
Apart from the video driver issue, are there any other problems with it? I'd mainly be usig it for a phone, and running Tomtom.
Thanks!
Seriously... Don't bother!
LOL...it's that bad?
Can you explain why?
You will miss your qwerty. I don't know your Blue Angel, But my TC (i think all PocketPCs) has a delay when somebody calls you. Your phone will ring/vibrate after the one who calls you hears the first ring. So if somebody just gives you a call with one ring (bip) you won't hear it! Is it the same in your case, or mine is special? Maybe somebody else with TC can confirm/infirm this...
Yea, mine sort of have that sort of dealy.
I don't use my QWERTY keyboard anyway so that's not a problem.
the_scotsman said:
LOL...it's that bad?
Can you explain why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just everything about it...
The build quality is terrible. Feels like a new hobbyist threw it together in 5 mins.
It seriously underperforms compared to my Old SE P990i and older XDA's
The modifications o2 have made to the software are rubbish.
I'm miffed I didn't hold out for the SE X1i
^ In your opinion, yes its not perfect, the screen is less than ideal but the build quality is great I think. Much better than my old SE P series phone which used to creak whenever squeezed etc and the flush screen is better than orbit 1
But I would hold out for the Diamond
I want the built in GPS, and the Diamond prices ae too much for what it is...
Any other decent HTCs with built in GPS?
the_scotsman said:
I currently have a Blue Angel and I'm considering upgrading to an Orbit 2.
How would the performance compare between the 2? They're both 400MHz, but I just wondered how the Qualcomm is compared to the XScale?
Apart from the video driver issue, are there any other problems with it? I'd mainly be usig it for a phone, and running Tomtom.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just switched from a Hermes/Tytn to the Orbit2. HardSPL'd it and installed the WM6.1 that's been floating about here and installed TomTom.
Losing the keyboard is a bit annoying (on screen is usable, but nowhere near as good) - but I realized I very rarely typed anything and smaller sized massively outweighs it.
GPS works very well - especially as Quick GPS which really does work.
Downsides:
Lost keyboard.
Upsides:
GPS - now just not having to lug around and charge my BT GPS module, but now much faster and lets me do all manner of stuff (geo-tag photos with a reg tweak), GPS trackers allowing me to see where I've been in google maps blah blah.
Much better camera - not so much the 2M -> 3M change - but AUTOFOCUS.
SMALLER - now it's not a small phone, but it's not an f'in brick like the last one.
No real difference noticed between the processors. Latest 6.1 I put on my Hermes made it lovely and snappy - and performs exactly the same on the Polaris. Only reservation I've got with the polaris is the screen res (i.e. same old rubbish). Not entirely convinced Hi-res WM is much better though after playign with colleagues PDAs - I've got an ipod touch and THAT is what i'd want somehow wedged into my phone..
In summary, if you want a phone now, I'd definitely get the XDA. If you can wait maybe see how Diamond and 3G iPhone stack up.
#edit - and build quality on my XDA (at least) is perfect. Nice solid feeling thing, love the slightly rubberized case.
Thanks very much for your opinion...I think I might just go with the Orbit 2 after all...a VGA screen would be nice, but I'm happy enough to have the standard one...and it's a little smaller than my BLue Angel so that's always a benefit.
Seriously this is an outstanding device. Software is software and any issues can 99% of the time be sorted with it and normally are, especially when you browse around these forums. Also bare in mind that all these devices now use windows mobile so I don't understand why someone would fault the Orbit 2 over another windows mobile device because of the software it comes with.....anyway the hardware itself is exceptional, I've posted a mini review if you look through my post history and there's plenty of in-depth reviews out there.
Losing the keyboard is a good thing in my opinion. A keyboard isn't necessary, its just as easy (if not easier) to use the software input (my personal preference is a T9 style pad that learns words and is very quick to use with just one hand like a normal phone) and obviously you save on weight and bulk.
The Orbit 2 looks great, is extremely responsive and comfortable to use and in my opinion is the best windows mobile device availible at this time.
Quick edit! - regarding the SW, the rom that the O2 Orbit 2 comes with is actually fine anyway, i've never encountered any issues with it - it would be nice to have the threaded SMS that 6.1 has but aside from that its fine and works great. Cheers!
SOunds like you're pretty damn happy with it then
So the 200MHz processor isn't an issue? Still responds well? Thing like TOmtom run well?
The Orbit 2 has a 400MHz CPU, it was the original Orbit that had 200 -it also has twice the amount of memory. TomTom was perfectly useable on the original Orbit but it noticeably runs smoother on the Orbit 2 - The Orbit 2 is a lot better at managing multiple tasks at the same time.
I was in two minds before upgrading becasue I had the original Orbit and wasn't sure if I'd get my money's worth. I was going to send it back if I wasn't happy with it. I'm more than happy with it though as you can tell! its a great device. You've always got that 14 day cooling period with O2 anyway so you may as well give it a go for yourself.
doh...you're right...I was thinking of the original Orbit.
No 14 day cooling off for me..I'm in Australia so the only way to get at a decent price is eBay.
I think I've been convinced to get the Orbit 2...just a pity it doesn't have VGA...and the diamond will probably be a fair amount more than the Orbit 2
Actually a the Diamond will be cheaper then the Polaris/Orbit2... But my oppinion is that the VGA is too much on a 2.8" screen...
The Orbit 2 is a damn good toy... after tuning the cache and graphic settings..speed was even better than before..
also gps works great...a lot of stuff in a small little case...
I am also happy with my orbit 2, copilot in mo is better then tomtom i have both installed.
I like golive's interface and extra settings plus the website for tracking is a good feature.
The Software available is none stop from here and other sources, unlike the iphone i had that you could only load decentish software if you hacked it..
a couple of minor gripes, the screen is a little shiny for sunny day use and the camera could be alot better.
apart from that i am very happy with it, let hops the diamond touch flo 3d becomes available then that will make this device look great.
the hsdpa speed is great when in the right areas, 50k download speed from my laptop...
the gps seems acurate enough, fast on a warm start as well.
its performance could be a little better but overall its very good.
I would install opera mini as i have found this much better then ie and opera mobile for day to day use.
as for the missing keyboard, try touchpal or the diamond keyboards, also make sure you adjust the sensivity of the screen do a search on here, i think the keyboard is great been software as you can load loads of different types and type quicker with the stylus on some over a flip out keyboard.
the flip out keyboard types can be a little thicker as well you cannot replace or remap keys like a software keyboard so there are plus's and minus's to both concepts...
if you type alot then get a bluetooth keyboard, or a laptop.....
i don't think you will b unhappy with your purchase...
Actually imho any HTC device when just introduced will very rarely be upto my expectation and initially i am always dissapointed,for the first few days,its just a matter of customizing(a heart felt thanks to this forum for teaching us how too) to our personal choice and then i just can't seem to live without them.When i took the Cruise i returned it the next day,very dissapointed with the handset,nothing it could do(and in the factory state it could'nt domuch)was enough,I thought that my Kaiser was far better,then after going through the Cruise forum went and picked it up again,customized it and now wonder how did I ever think negatively abbout this handset,I just love it the feel of it in my hand and also the perfomance,ended up keeping both the Kaiser and Cruise without regrets.