Hi everyone,
I stumbled over the fact, that the Snapdragon S4 has relativly poor "NEON performance" (www[dot]openssl.org/~appro/Snapdragon-S4.html) and therfore
DosBox, and other emulation software, runs not as fast as one would expect on it (Snapdragon S4 Pro @ 1.5 Ghz 10-20% slower than a Tegra 3 @ 1.5 Ghz).
This is an issue for me since DosBox ist one of the things I'm looking forward to use on the One.
My question is, has this problem/issue been solved with the Snapdragon 801 (performance per clock wise)?
Yes I understand that this isn't exactly an OnePlus One related question, but I dont think it fits in "Hardware Hacking" either.
Greating Dominatore
Can anyone comfirm whether Xperia 5 has UFS 2.1 or UFS 3.0?
In their official blog, they says it's UFS 3.0
https://blogs.sonymobile.com/de/2019/09/05/sony-mobile-auf-der-ifa-2019/
"Die technische Basis bilden ein Snapdragon 855 Prozessor, Android 9 (Pie), 6 GB RAM sowie 128 GB interner UFS 3.0 Speicher. Gorilla Glas 6 von Corning schützt Vorder- und Rückseite zuverlässig."
But in official forum, they says they can't answer to the question.
https://talk.sonymobile.com/t5/Xperia-5/UFS-2-1-or-UFS-3-0/m-p/1388440
And some memory benchmark shows speed of UFS2.1.
It's not that UFS 2.1 is deal-breaker but as much as I'd like to know about UFS type, I just want to know why sony doesn't answer to the question which answer is publicly posted on their official blog.
Is the ram LPDDR4 or LPDDR5?
Is the storage UFS 3.1?
Xperia 1 II has LPDDR5 and UFS 3.0. This may have UFS 3.1 considering they also upgraded the screen to 120Hz. I'd expect the specs to be the same or better than the 1 II as it's just a smaller FHD+ version.
skyhawk304 said:
Xperia 1 II has LPDDR5 and UFS 3.0. This may have UFS 3.1 considering they also upgraded the screen to 120Hz. I'd expect the specs to be the same or better than the 1 II as it's just a smaller FHD+ version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wikipedia has listed as LPDDR4X so I am asking around, did they really decide to cut corners here, hope not since they are also advertising as game phone too.
Does UFS 3.1 against 3.0 matter in any application? No...
It's UFS 3.0 https://www.sony.com/electronics/support/mobile-phones-tablets-mobile-phones/xperia-1-ii/articles/00246376
I have the phone, It has UFS 3.0 and LPDDR5 ram.
Hi, In my hand are two notes 20Ultra .One SM-N9860DS second SM-N986BDS. So first is with Snapdragon and last it is Exynos. I have the same aplication, level system. So start situation for benchmark test is parallel. I have tried Geekbench5, Geekbench4, 3DMark and more then 3/4 tests Exynos is better then Snapdragon. Quite different theory we can find in Internet... To that my first experience was with SM-N986U1 from US and this model was always better to Exynos 200- 250 pkt in Geekbench5. To tell You truth I don't undrestend: it is sowtware problem or other issues?
Last resalts 3DMark
Snapdragon 4134 pkt
Exynos 4232 pkt.
Do You have the same experience ?
I've seen exynos at 540000,with continuous drop in scores after several tests. Here is mine sd variant
Is it Antutu?
What is Youre Exynos resalts? That what I found in media , that no procesor generate the problem but the cooling system. If You have grafen inside Exynos will working very well. Unfortunately no-one know what we have in own hand.
BR
Yes Antutu snapdragon.I don't have exynos but have seen on youtube.
The exynos is slower than the snapdragon also throttles faster. Several test show this...
Hi, I have got 600086. Whats resalts You have others owners... How about Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra with 16GB RAM and Snapdragons CPU?
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
1 said:
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would definitely keep your order running.
I had both versions of the S21 ultra.
Im not playing games, but use my phones a lot... And to be honest, i couldn't feel or see any difference.
I pre-order the S22 ultra to in the Exynos version without any concerns vs the SD version.
I have the Tab S7 to and never had any problems.
This is just my humble opinion
Per Tom's Hardware:
Ice Universe says that the AMD RNDA2 GPU part of the Exynos SoC has a target clock speed of 1.9 GHz. However, in practice, due to thermal issues, it could only run at 1.29 GHz, in an acceptable manner. Various clocks between 1.29 GHz and 1.9 GHz were tested, goes the tale, but the lesser speed was the first with acceptable thermals. The actual temperatures are not revealed, instead we learn that all for speeds greater than 1.29 GHz, they are "hot".
Ice Universe has some further interesting info about what Samsung is trying now that it has hit that thermal throttling performance wall. According to Ice Universe's leak, Samsung is going to try and tweak things to get the GPU running acceptably at 1.49GHz "to restore some dignity".
I've used both of them and based on my experience, Snapdragon is always better. It gives you stable performance and often supports bootloader unlocking.
sureshkumargs said:
I've used both of them and based on my experience, Snapdragon is always better. It gives you stable performance and often supports bootloader unlocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Snapdragon often supports bootloader unlocking" Not on S Series devices, much wider availability on Exynos variants. Only one Snapdragon variant offered bootloader access on the S21 Ultra, SM-G9980.
You would find More developers working on snap dragon than Exynos to bring custom ROMS. If you see devices such as Poco F1, OnePlus 8T and X3 Pro you would find almost every custom from working on them.
This is a S22 Ultra Forum, we're not discussing a bunch of cheap Chinese phones nor is the OP asking questions about them. What does your response have do with the unlocked bootloaders on S Series variants? Exynos devices have far more development and custom ROM's on S Series than Snapdragon. In reality development is declining with Samsung devices, Android 12 and OneUI 4 has made it far more challenging to implement custom platforms.
1 said:
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you've ordered a Exynos equipped device I assume you're in Europe or the UK, correct? So your Service Provider can only enable all their Call Features (5G, Carrier Aggregation and the rest) if you have a Exynos Chipset and their branded phone or possibly the unlocked device. How valuable are those features to you? For me it's a no brainer, I would only aquire the Snapdragon SoC no matter where I lived "if" I wanted the device, which I don't. The more that is made public, the less confidence I have in the S22 Ultra, particularly the Exynos version. Honestly, if someone gave one to me for free, I'd give it back.
Thanks for the replies. I've found this on youtube and it shows that the performance of Exynos 2100 has been improved / optimised in time and caught up with SD so decided to keep Exynos version.
1 said:
Thanks for the replies. I've found this on youtube and it shows that the performance of Exynos 2100 has been improved / optimised in time and caught up with SD so decided to keep Exynos version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the S21 Exynos SoC. The S32 Ultra has a Exynos 2200 Chipset which has been totally redesigned.
varcor said:
That's the S21 Exynos SoC. The S32 Ultra has a Exynos 2200 Chipset which has been totally redesigned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm aware of it. I shared it as a reference of how Samsung support Exynos 2100 in time and improved it's performance. So Exynos 2200 might have a lower score against SD at the moment but it's performance will be improved in time too.