I haven't seen anyone mention but the latest update we got has the RAM+ feature that adds 4 more GB of RAM so total of 12GB RAM now. check it out in Memory settings...
ShayMagen said:
I haven't seen anyone mention but the latest update we got has the RAM+ feature that adds 4 more GB of RAM so total of 12GB RAM now. check it out in Memory settings...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure it isn't virtual RAM?
It is virtual memory, as in you lose X GB of internal storage to act as "fake" RAM, which will actually shorten the lifespan of the storage.
It's only somewhat of a boost. Think of it as 2/3 of the actual amount of RAM it claims to emulate because you have to consider the loss for being a mounted image. It will allow you to run a little more, but may also come with hiccups.
twistedumbrella said:
Are you sure it isn't virtual RAM? As in you lose X GB of internal storage to act as "fake" RAM, which will actually shorten the lifespan of the storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup thats virtual RAM
twistedumbrella said:
Are you sure it isn't virtual RAM?
It is virtual memory, as in you lose X GB of internal storage to act as "fake" RAM, which will actually shorten the lifespan of the storage.
It's only somewhat of a boost. Think of it as 2/3 of the actual amount of RAM it claims to emulate because you have to consider the loss for being a mounted image. It will allow you to run a little more, but may also come with hiccups.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah will be a slow RAM
Is it active all the time or need to be activated manually?
It is active all the time. Found no way to deactivate
eybee1970 said:
It is active all the time. Found no way to deactivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stay within the hardware and it won't be used.
I'd be interested to know where it's created. If they managed to free up the extra space in the system (or some other dedicated) partition, it may not be that bad. It would be a shame to have lost the space in storage without any option to disable it.
I don't see what the point of that is, I don't fill the ram to begin with, it mostly sits at 4.6GB used.
phatmanxxl said:
I don't see what the point of that is, I don't fill the ram to begin with, it mostly sits at 4.6GB used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S20 and S21 base models were 8GB. The Note 20 Ultra and S21 Ultra were 12GB. The Galaxy Z Fold is 12GB. The point is to take a little pressure off the phone not living up to current "high-end" devices. It's probably also a little bit of an apology for a decision Samsung regrets.
twistedumbrella said:
The S20 and S21 base models were 8GB. The Note 20 Ultra and S21 Ultra were 12GB. The Galaxy Z Fold is 12GB. The point is to take a little pressure off the phone not living up to current "high-end" devices. It's probably also a little bit of an apology for a decision Samsung regrets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense, I debloated this phone as much as possible so it would go easy on the ram and battery but I can see the average normie having several social media apps running 24/7 on these phones.
Related
There seems to be some good deals around on the 8GB model at the moment but not for the 16GB. Obviously more memory is always better - the phone it will replace is the Samsung S2 which has been memory bound, however with an SD slot in the Moto G will it actually be an issue having less onboard?
I know that Android M has ability to use SD cards for system storage and that it hasn't been released yet. This can only be a few weeks away?
At near half the price of the 16GB, is the 8GB a much better purchase?
What about the difference in RAM? 2gb better than 1.
jlmcr87 said:
What about the difference in RAM? 2gb better than 1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I hadn't appreciated that - thanks for pointing that out....I guess it could be a bit of a dog without enough RAM?
Size does matters my friends....
Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
My 1GB RAM model is pretty great for the price. Battery life is fantastic, however having the low_ram flag enabled in build.prop is a bit of an issue for some apps.
https://forums.motorola.com/posts/5092b3f241
1 GB RAM vs. 2 GB RAM really does make a difference.
Initially I bought the 1 GB Moto G, as here in Germany the 2 GB version is only available with a hefty price tag via Moto Maker. Later on replaced this with a 2 GB Moto G ordered from Amazon Italy (less expensive than the 1 GB version here in Germany ).
At first glance performance is pretty much the same.
Though the 2 GB version can keep more apps in memory in the background.
With 1 GB I had sometimes the problem that Android did kill e.g. the Music player running in the background while surfing the web with Google Chrome (Chrome is a huge memory hog).
So far I didn't have such issues with the 2 GB Moto G.
Also the 2 GB version is for sure more future proof. Which is important if you are not willing to buy a new phone every 1-2 years.
My previous phone was a Samsung Galaxy S Plus. Which was perfectly ok for my everyday tasks since I think back in 2011 until a few weeks ago - thanks to good custom ROM support.
What made me exchange it for the Moto G in the end was the performance bottle neck caused by the lack of free memory (512 MB) and not the CPU or the rest of the hardware.
So I hope thanks to 2 GB RAM the Moto G will last me at least as long as my old Galaxy S Plus.
It doesn't really matter if you picked up a high speed SD card and use Marshmallow. I've seen no problems with the external SD -> internal SD feature.
About the RAM difference, you should use virtualized RAM as soon as you can if you're using the 1 GB model.
I only paid the extra because of that extra 1gb of ram. Believe me...it matters!! If you want to keep app updates coming, xposed modules running, etc etc....you need that extra ram. This is a great phone out of the box, but if you're here and you're asking, you're probably not leaving it untouched
I've got the 1gb model, and never found myself wanting more. Of course I keep my use simple. But for what I do, its more than enough.
My previous device had 1 GB of RAM. In my opinion, the 2 GB is definitely worth the extra cash. The multitasking difference is night and day to me, and I no longer have to worry about what is running in the background slowing the device down. I do a fair amount of gaming on Android as well, it is nice to sit back and play a game with Pandora or similar running without the OS killing it to free up memory for the game.
The 2gb makes it much more future proof. I have the 2gb version and I have never had to close any app most of the time. With 1gb of ram, you will have to close apps much more often making multi tasking a little more difficult.
SirSoviet said:
It doesn't really matter if you picked up a high speed SD card and use Marshmallow. I've seen no problems with the external SD -> internal SD feature.
About the RAM difference, you should use virtualized RAM as soon as you can if you're using the 1 GB model.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is 'virtualized ram?'
I'm in the boat with the 1 giggers and I'm curious how to do that.
I mainly use this phone for office tasks and it performs incredibly, but hey! An increase is an increase right?
Also curious about the posters response about low_ram flag.
christopherrrg said:
What is 'virtualized ram?'
I'm in the boat with the 1 giggers and I'm curious how to do that.
I mainly use this phone for office tasks and it performs incredibly, but hey! An increase is an increase right?
Also curious about the posters response about low_ram flag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In Kernel Adiutor there is a Virtual Memory section and if you scroll down all the way there is a slider called Z-RAM. You can adjust the size of the memory there. Instead of using a swap file this compresses the RAM, making room for extra storage. But it has downsides, the extra processing required to compress the RAM eats the battery at a slightly faster rate.
I haven't heard about the low_ram flag, I'm afraid that I cannot tell you about it.
SirSoviet said:
In Kernel Adiutor there is a Virtual Memory section and if you scroll down all the way there is a slider called Z-RAM. You can adjust the size of the memory there. Instead of using a swap file this compresses the RAM, making room for extra storage. But it has downsides, the extra processing required to compress the RAM eats the battery at a slightly faster rate.
I haven't heard about the low_ram flag, I'm afraid that I cannot tell you about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! It passed me honestly because I haven't messed around with any kernels since my n5. Usually just flash and let it fly lol I'm gonna check it out now though, appreciate the push!
I was wondering for light to moderate use which model between the 6gb and 8gb do you think would be more taxing on battery.
I'm assuming I would likely never fill 6gb as I close apps when not in use and only use a handful anyway.
What are your thoughts?
I'm no developer but if I had to guess, I don't think the difference in RAM has any effect on battery life. If it does, I'm sure it's so little it would be impossible to notice. Anyone who is more knowledgeable than me on this, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!
varignet said:
I was wondering for light to moderate use which model between the 6gb and 8gb do you think would be more taxing on battery.
I'm assuming I would likely never fill 6gb as I close apps when not in use and only use a handful anyway.
What are your thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question ! I was also wondering the same thing. Logically speaking there should be a difference but only significant if there are less physical chips on board for the 6GB model. I am very much inclined to order the 6GB model for a bit better battery life - 64GB of storage is plenty for me anyway.
Cst79 said:
Good question ! I was also wondering the same thing. Logically speaking there should be a difference but only significant if there are less physical chips on board for the 6GB model. I am very much inclined to order the 6GB model for a bit better battery life - 64GB of storage is plenty for me anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thing is, just like with flash storage, the controller and actual configuration of the chips will make power consumption vary wildly. We don't know the clock speed of the LPDDR4X RAM they are using, maybe it's different between the 6 and 8gb version.
Same as with the NAND chips, many factors have an influence on the electrical consumption and maybe they tweaked the 128 and 256gb version to be more energy conservative at the cost of speed.... speed that may be regained due to the fact that NAND arrays/strings are faster when there are more cells in them.
Then there's the use-case... IF the 8GB version has worse energy consumption values, maybe it still has better battery life because it can store more apps in RAM and has less need to constantly access the flash memory ?
TL;DR : we can make hypothesis but in the end there's just too much we don't know to really say if one is more energy efficient than the other.
more goods is better always !!
now with 8gb ram I can open all my apps and keeps them opened all day which will stress less processor power and keep battery.
Also, I need as much as possible storage, 256gb is ok for now.
We don't know how to get fine the kernel and OS for more ram, I would hope they would reduce compression so it strains the CPU less i.e. zram, or use the extra space to cache more things across the OS to keep things more consistent. I don't notice anymore apps open on the 8gb op6 Vs 6gb op5t.
In saying that my op6 has yet to use more than 5gb ram
ram uses the same power regardless
if the chip is the same - both use the same amount of power
only difference will be one can have more apps in memory than the other (assuming you can fill 6GB of ram... on a phone...)
other than that zero difference
Considering how experiences on the battery related threads seem to vary wildly, I wonder if this is the cause?
I was considering downgrading from an 8Gb version to 6Gb, but if I plan to keep this phone for a few years is it better to hold on to the 8Gb?
3Gb seemed like overkill when I first got my OPO but now it is less than some budget phones provide.
My OP6 - 6Gb close Google Maps and Sportify with 2,1 GB free...
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A6003 mediante Tapatalk
Nothing to do with battery life, but there seems to be some very aggressive ram management on the OP6 which affects the 6Gb version much more than the 8Gb: https://youtu.be/t5UEN2vpchQ
Maybe I will keep the 8Gb version after all.
Hi
This is my first time I'll be buying a OP phone I want to buy the OP7 Pro I know that the T series is coming out in a few weeks but I have the money for a OP7 Pro so I want know if there is a huge difference between a 6gb of Ram or a 8Gb of Ram speaking of performance.
More RAM = More App Memory
Thank you
I've never owned a one plus or had more than 4 GB ram, but I don't think there is going to be a difference
Cowbell_Guy said:
I've never owned a one plus or had more than 4 GB ram, but I don't think there is going to be a difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll be feeling the op 7 pro like a GTR because my current phone has 2Gb of ram pretty sad
Alejandro21_T said:
Hi
This is my first time I'll be buying a OP phone I want to buy the OP7 Pro I know that the T series is coming out in a few weeks but I have the money for a OP7 Pro so I want know if there is a huge difference between a 6gb of Ram or a 8Gb of Ram speaking of performance.
More RAM = More App Memory
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's always nice to have more ram, but relatively speaking, 6gb should be just fine
6 should work a treat!
I think some people think excessive RAM (or 12) can cause battery drain
I would go with 8GB. 6GB is enough but apps keep growing update by update and duplicate in size year by year (Bold claim, but you see how it goes) big games no just use more Storage but also more RAM to run or stay in background
Cowbell_Guy said:
I think some people think excessive RAM (or 12) can cause battery drain
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard
Arden144 said:
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not dumb at all when you consider that RAM is just electronic chips that are active all the time the phone is turned on. Therefore, the more chips that are actively using electricity are ultimately using more battery.
Of course it is probably something that can only be measured with sophisticated instruments and will not make a big difference in your daily battery life.
I've had phones with 3, 4, 6, and 8 GB RAM. They all worked basically the same and you will most likely not see any difference between 6 and 8. My current 7 Pro has "only" 6 and this thing just flies through everything I can throw at it.
The way Android works, the more RAM you have the more apps you can "keep" open in RAM without them having to be completely reloaded every time you need them.
But we are talking OnePLus here... and we all know they are notorious for randomly/aggressively stopping apps in the background!
So even if you have 8 or 12 GB RAM OnePlus will probably clear it all out so that you are only utilizing 2 GB at any one time.
Now according to OnePLus.... they are working on a "fix" so that their Oxygen OS is not so aggressive with RAM management. We'll just have to wait and see.
I average 5gb, I think 6 would be too less, 8gb is the minimum I'd go at this point.
jaseman said:
Not dumb at all when you consider that RAM is just electronic chips that are active all the time the phone is turned on. Therefore, the more chips that are actively using electricity are ultimately using more battery.
Of course it is probably something that can only be measured with sophisticated instruments and will not make a big difference in your daily battery life.
I've had phones with 3, 4, 6, and 8 GB RAM. They all worked basically the same and you will most likely not see any difference between 6 and 8. My current 7 Pro has "only" 6 and this thing just flies through everything I can throw at it.
The way Android works, the more RAM you have the more apps you can "keep" open in RAM without them having to be completely reloaded every time you need them.
But we are talking OnePLus here... and we all know they are notorious for randomly/aggressively stopping apps in the background!
So even if you have 8 or 12 GB RAM OnePlus will probably clear it all out so that you are only utilizing 2 GB at any one time.
Now according to OnePLus.... they are working on a "fix" so that their Oxygen OS is not so aggressive with RAM management. We'll just have to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RAM power draw is negligible, as you said. On my 12gb device with SmurfKernel, all OnePlus memory management is removed, so my RAM usage averages 80%
If those are your only choices...8gb
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:10 AM ----------
Arden144 said:
RAM power draw is negligible, as you said. On my 12gb device with SmurfKernel, all OnePlus memory management is removed, so my RAM usage averages 80%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean OnePlus memory management removed?
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
cobrajet7 said:
If those are your only choices...8gb
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:10 AM ----------
What do you mean OnePlus memory management removed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OnePlus has a bunch of services for controlling RAM usage, like RAM boost, but they do more harm than good in most cases. SmurfKernel uses a simple way of controlling RAM usage that keeps apps ready to launch as long as possible. For example, on the stock kernel I see game being removed from memory very shortly after I close them as the kernel maintains about 4.5/12gb of RAM used. On Smurf, multiple games may stay ready in RAM to open instantly, with averages of 10/12gb usage.
Cowbell_Guy said:
I've never owned a one plus or had more than 4 GB ram, but I don't think there is going to be a difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going from pixel 2 with 4gb....it's a massive difference
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
If you are a heavy user or a pro gamer you can go with the 8GB variant. And if not then I think 6GB would be fine.
paulsims said:
If you are a heavy user or a pro gamer you can go with the 8GB variant. And if not then I think 6GB would be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can confirm! As someone that occasionally plays idle games 6GB just works.
See no mention of this.
Have they backpedaled on max RAM?
cpufrost said:
See no mention of this.
Have they backpedaled on max RAM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes less than on the s20 ultra unfortunately 12gb only.
they say things have been so optimized on the note and faster internal storage 12 is enough.
the note is supposed to be THE sammy flagship yet its less so in the ram dept (and a few others) than the S20 ultra.
not good
UFS? Is 3.1 so they say 16GB is not needed
I've hit 12GB RAM on my S20 Ultra in use. It will use more ram if it has it just like a 128GB Windows 10 box will be using close to 10GB idle.
And the fact the screen is still 60Hz at QHD.
Doesn't seem to be much of an upgrade to me.
Perhaps if they were giving me $750 trade in, maybe, just maybe but I think this may be a pass which makes it the first time I didn't get a Note.
Waiting for S30 leaks now!
So I know with solid state drives, larger capacities in general are faster and longer lasting than lower capacities. Obviously, we can't test this yet on the Note 20 Ultra but would the 512 GB have any noticable benefit over the 128 GB?
16 GB RAM would have sweetened the deal but I guess we can't have it all.
Not sure, I only ordered 1 phone so I have no way to test it side by side. But I know a 1TB MicroSDXC card is going in it
Guyinlaca said:
So I know with solid state drives, larger capacities in general are faster and longer lasting than lower capacities. Obviously, we can't test this yet on the Note 20 Ultra but would the 512 GB have any noticable benefit over the 128 GB?
16 GB RAM would have sweetened the deal but I guess we can't have it all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt there is going to be a performance difference considering they are the same UFS 3.1 tech just different capacity, however the OS is taking up the same space and running same speed.
As for 12gb of ram vs 16gb. I really doubt you could tell the difference
Sent from my SM-G986U1 using Tapatalk
GSMarena has updated the storage specification from UFS 3.1 to UFS 3.0, does anyone have any benchmarks on the storage ?
_bottle_ said:
GSMarena has updated the storage specification from UFS 3.1 to UFS 3.0, does anyone have any benchmarks on the storage ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow so basically it's an S20 ultra with a pen, overclocked 865 and 4GB less RAM.
512GB should "theoretically" be faster than 128GB version just based on how flash memory is arranged. But that is storage only and shouldn't really matter to everyday use I suppose. It's all speculative at this point until we have the devices in our hands though.
I remember how much better the S10 5G was than the S10+ just based on the bigger size. I hope the Note 20 Ultra is the same. I much prefer the squared off shape though.
Guyinlaca said:
So I know with solid state drives, larger capacities in general are faster and longer lasting than lower capacities. Obviously, we can't test this yet on the Note 20 Ultra but would the 512 GB have any noticable benefit over the 128 GB?
16 GB RAM would have sweetened the deal but I guess we can't have it all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same SSD rules will apply here. 512GB will be faster (not noticeable in normal use tho) and will have longer endurance for write cycles. See this snapshot someone uploaded on reddit that clearly states the differences in speed
Not sure if this applies here but has anyone bought Samsung UFS card for external storage and or if it's compatible