I recently published a small app named Street Media. Now I wanted to add an update to the app but https://labs.xda-developers.com won't let me add another build. It says invalid signing key for app. I am pretty sure that key is valid because I used the same key when I added the first build.
The same thing happened to me a few days back and then I had to create a new app and submit the update. Also I had to unpublish the older one. But in that scenario I changed the siging key so I thought maybe it needed the same signing key so I created a new app and submitted the apk file but now it is giving me the error again. I use Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 with Xamarin to build the app and it works fine. I am not sure what am I doing wrong while uploading the new build.
Can someone assist me here? It can be a bug within the website but I am not sure. I can provide the apk file if needed. Thank you.
ahmar16 said:
I recently published a small app named Street Media. Now I wanted to add an update to the app but https://labs.xda-developers.com won't let me add another build. It says invalid signing key for app. I am pretty sure that key is valid because I used the same key when I added the first build.
The same thing happened to me a few days back and then I had to create a new app and submit the update. Also I had to unpublish the older one. But in that scenario I changed the siging key so I thought maybe it needed the same signing key so I created a new app and submitted the apk file but now it is giving me the error again. I use Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 with Xamarin to build the app and it works fine. I am not sure what am I doing wrong while uploading the new build.
Can someone assist me here? It can be a bug within the website but I am not sure. I can provide the apk file if needed. Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That error message is regarding the different signatures you used to sign the app currently on the Labs Store and the one you're trying to upload.
If you used a different signature key, than the last one currently on the Labs Store, to sign the app your trying to upload, then you will need to either sign the current one with the same signature key as the last one OR remove all the app versions currently on the Labs Store in order to upload the current version with the new key.
I hope that I had explained this okay via text... :thumbup:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.
Ibuprophen said:
That error message is regarding the different signatures you used to sign the app currently on the Labs Store and the one you're trying to upload.
If you used a different signature key, than the last one currently on the Labs Store, to sign the app your trying to upload, then you will need to either sign the current one with the same signature key as the last one OR remove all the app versions currently on the Labs Store in order to upload the current version with the new key.
I hope that I had explained this okay via text... :thumbup:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time. I used the same signing key as I did for the first build. I also checked it with the apksigntool and the apk is signed properly.
So according to your suggestion I should remove the first build completely from the app page and then add the next build again to remove this warning. I'll experiment with it and report back.
Update:
It did not resolve the issue. I tried to delete the existing build and then when I uploaded a new one it still showed the error so I just created a new app and uploaded the new build there. Maybe someone needs to look into it.
ahmar16 said:
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm...
Maybe @Wood Man can provide some clarity or refer someone else who can?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.
ahmar16 said:
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time. I used the same signing key as I did for the first build. I also checked it with the apksigntool and the apk is signed properly.
So according to your suggestion I should remove the first build completely from the app page and then add the next build again to remove this warning. I'll experiment with it and report back.
Update:
It did not resolve the issue. I tried to delete the existing build and then when I uploaded a new one it still showed the error so I just created a new app and uploaded the new build there. Maybe someone needs to look into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you can start by reading around this post in case it could help: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/labs-t3241866/post74890303
Maybe the package name could be the culprit? Or something else?
If no luck, you can try to send a PM blk_jack.
Wood Man said:
Maybe you can start by reading around this post in case it could help..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the Package Name but, would a "Signature Key" error be a result of a different Package Name?
It would be great (if it were possible) to have some type of listing of Labs Store error messages and what they would entail.
Maybe this would fall into @blk_jack area or even the Technical Area that @bitpushr would know. I've got a feeling that this may already exist... LMAO!!!
Thank you very much for responding My Friend!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.
Well thank you for your time guys. I have not changed package name or any properties in the package except the version codes. But I also found out that Xamarin does a weird thing while signing the apk. If you create a new keystore with full name and other properties it only recognises the full name in it and ignores other properties while signing the apk. So every time it will sign the app with DN: CN=Full Name and thats it but I also had the C=PK with it and that never gets added. This is one of the reasons why it shows the apk has been signed differently.
Anyway it is a problem with Xamarin but it signs the apk properly in any case. So now I'd just PM the mentioned person and see what they have to say about it. Thank you again.
Same issue, is there a way to upload my new build with new signature?
Because I lost my old signature
Edit: I found a solution for that.
The solution is unpublish the project that you can't upload a new build and create a new one in developer admin console and upload your new build signed with your new key signature. Its my workaround for now.
Related
Does anyone have issues with it working? Sometimes it works, then other times it completely stops doing anything. It will popup and ill start swyping but it wont register anything.
psufan5 said:
Does anyone have issues with it working? Sometimes it works, then other times it completely stops doing anything. It will popup and ill start swyping but it wont register anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen other people say that when they have issues with swype, just switch input (long press on a text field and change input to keyboard), then switch back and it should be OK
homeslice976 said:
I've seen other people say that when they have issues with swype, just switch input (long press on a text field and change input to keyboard), then switch back and it should be OK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thats just annoying though... Swiftkey did the same thing.
psufan5 said:
Yeah thats just annoying though... Swiftkey did the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. I understand. It is just a beta though isn't it? Give it time to grow
psufan5 said:
Does anyone have issues with it working? Sometimes it works, then other times it completely stops doing anything. It will popup and ill start swyping but it wont register anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stopped using it for this reason. Having to switch text input was irritating me. I just use the stock keyboard, works fine.
I stopped using it because of this issue until I flashed CM7. Figured i would give it another try. It has not stopped working in the 3 days that I have been using CM7, so maybe it had something to do with AR?
Does it come on all the roms? Can't find swype on mine.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
I have the same issues with Swype on AR 3, and now RCMix HD 4.1... But since there's an easy workaround, I'll keep using it as I like Swyping so much.
It works fine on my stock, un-rooted Inspire. I just simply downloaded the latest Swype apk file, and side loaded it through SWM. Simple, clean and easy. It works flawlessly, and has been for weeks now.
I just started having this problem today actually. I have been using it for a week and a half now. Don't know why it just happened today. I had to reset it twice earlier but fine now.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
colbur87 said:
Does it come on all the roms? Can't find swype on mine.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you have to sign up for the beta here where they send you a download link. At which point in your browser it may tell you that you are not using an android device. If you encounter this change your settings to show as a mobile and then you should be able to download and load it the way they show there
link as follows
http://beta.swype.com/
happy hunting
After reading the terms of service on XDA regarding swype, I removed this post. The post linked to another member who linked the apk file. In the future, anyone considering posting a swype apk file should read this...
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/official-stance-from-swype-inc-regarding-its-distribution/
Thanks to member phil.W for the heads up!
Cheers.
JDM9499 said:
Screw the beta version. Use the verified Swype. Maybe since it's a beta, that is why folks here are having problems. Just download the apk (non-beta version) and simply sideload the file with 'Sideload Wonder Machine'. Quick and easy.
You can get the real Swype version here in XDA. You could have done the search, or I'll just post the link here because I'm nice!
http://bit.ly/fhfgEa
There, on the last page, member cmeyer3 gives the download link.
Happy Swype(ing)!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you know this is the "Real" version and not just the apk someone got from the beta? Cause this (http://forum.androidcentral.com/htc-inspire-4g/60295-guide-installing-swype-beta-htc-inspire-4g.html - which is referenced in that thread) shows you how to pull the .apk out of the beta, which is what I believe is being shared
JDM9499 said:
Screw the beta version. Use the verified Swype. Maybe since it's a beta, that is why folks here are having problems. Just download the apk (non-beta version) and simply sideload the file with 'Sideload Wonder Machine'. Quick and easy.
You can get the real Swype version here in XDA. You could have done the search, or I'll just post the link here because I'm nice!
http://bit.ly/fhfgEa
There, on the last page, member cmeyer3 gives the download link.
Happy Swype(ing)!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you know this is the "Real" version and not just the apk someone got from the beta? Cause this (http://forum.androidcentral.com/htc-inspire-4g/60295-guide-installing-swype-beta-htc-inspire-4g.html) shows you how to pull the .apk out of the beta, which is what I believe is being shared. So although you don't need to sign up for the beta doing it this way, I *think* it's still the beta
not to mention of course that SWYPE does not want its apk being shared as such, and wants all copies to be properly licensed which even XDA is observing and removing links to the downloads when they see them to observe swypes request that they have proper copies and/or have permission to install it in their roms or on their own devices.
with link to corroborate the story from what I read yesterday
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/official-stance-from-swype-inc-regarding-its-distribution/
phil.W said:
not to mention of course that SWYPE does not want its apk being shared as such, and wants all copies to be properly licensed which even XDA is observing and removing links to the downloads when they see them to observe swypes request that they have proper copies and/or have permission to install it in their roms or on their own devices.
with link to corroborate the story from what I read yesterday
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/official-stance-from-swype-inc-regarding-its-distribution/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone should let cmeyer3 know
phil.W said:
not to mention of course that SWYPE does not want its apk being shared as such, and wants all copies to be properly licensed which even XDA is observing and removing links to the downloads when they see them to observe swypes request that they have proper copies and/or have permission to install it in their roms or on their own devices.
with link to corroborate the story from what I read yesterday
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/official-stance-from-swype-inc-regarding-its-distribution/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks phil.W for the the heads up. I removed my post on that matter upon reading those terms of service from the link you provided. And yes, someone should let the other member, who is linking to the apk file, know about that as well. No reason to step on anyone's foot over at Swype and cause any problems for developers here on XDA.
Thanks again.
Just as thread title says. At least on ayoteddy's gingerclone rom.
Just go find the apk, install, and enjoy!
Sent from my Sidekick 4G using XDA App
Your the man.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA App
Netflix from the market seems to be working on a lot of devices. About time.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Newest modded version WORKS!!! get the mod version (allows rotation Portrait and landscape for selection and viewing)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15842277#post15842277
Netflix-Rotation-Black-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Blue-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Green-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Orange-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Pink-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk
(select the color to chage the splash screen color)
Warning - first time loading it takes a LONG time to load up. be patient. Reboot phone if needed. But it DOES work (and this is BEFORE the new Firmware update)
please delete this post - duplicate
How exactly do I install the apk? Download to my SD card then what?
Download any apk installer from the market. I use easy-installer. Make sure you delete any other versions of netflix before you install the modded apk.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA App
I use Astro File Manager (free app). Dolphin browser (also free app) does great with downloads from the web. I then Open Astro, Use Astro's Search feature to search for "apk" or "netflix", then you can install the APK file from there.
Probably a very stupid question, but can't seem to access the thread for NetFlix App.
ncmacasl said:
Newest modded version WORKS!!! get the mod version (allows rotation Portrait and landscape for selection and viewing)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15842277#post15842277
Netflix-Rotation-Black-V1.3.apk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I'm quite sure this is an utterly stupid question, but I've dug around in the FAQ's and the general forums and can't see an answer so I'm going to risk being flamed as a noob to ask. When I try loading the link (above) for the Netflix app, I consistently get a message that I do not have permission to access the page, and that new users (with under 10 posts) aren't permitted to POST to the Devel forums.
I'm not trying to post - just to access the thread, and since it says "To encourage this new Users can read but not post in these forums." I assume that I should be able to view the thread. Am I missing something incredibly stupid and obvious, or doing something wrong, or is it just that you're unable to even view anything in the development-related forums until you have more than 10 posts?
Thanks to anyone who is kind enough to reply and open my eyes on this. If you really want to flame me for being a noob feel free, but it won't bother me any. I know my status, and my limits.
Adios!
Yeah, I hated their noob restrictions. I have uploaded the RED version to SugarSync (like DropBox)
If you want a different color, let me know and I will send it there, too. (using the same link, which links to the Folder, not the file)
https://www.sugarsync.com/share/c0a2jsq50cb47
Thanks ncmacasl, I appreciate it!
The red is fine, that's the version I was looking for anyways. I wouldn't have minded it as much if it were clear that it was part of the noob restrictions, but it seemed like the message was saying two different things so I wasn't sure.
Thanks for the help!
WARNING - someone havcked my sugar sync folder and replaced
from "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk"
to "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3 (by <my email address>).apk"
by someone named "Raul Carr <[email protected]>"
I assume he hacked it and added a virus or something. I changed it back, added more security to the file and removed him from membership. If you downloaded this 2nd version by mistake, please go back to the original version.
I downloaded Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk & it worked fine for me .
ncmacasl said:
WARNING - someone havcked my sugar sync folder and replaced
from "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk"
to "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3 (by <my email address>).apk"
by someone named "Raul Carr <[email protected]>"
I assume he hacked it and added a virus or something. I changed it back, added more security to the file and removed him from membership. If you downloaded this 2nd version by mistake, please go back to the original version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ncmacasl said:
Yeah, I hated their noob restrictions. I have uploaded the RED version to SugarSync (like DropBox)
If you want a different color, let me know and I will send it there, too. (using the same link, which links to the Folder, not the file)
https://www.sugarsync.com/share/c0a2jsq50cb47
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link Expired -- Here is new link (not sure how long it will last)
https://www.sugarsync.com/join/shar...ail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sharefolder https://www.sugarsync.com/join/shar...ail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sharefolder
If it stops working, PM me with an email address for an invite!
Sorry, i deleted the links as I didn'n know they will be paid apps.
Forgive the noob comment, but could I get some instructions on what I need to do.?
theatomizer90 said:
Forgive the noob comment, but could I get some instructions on what I need to do.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install APKs and put folders with .obb to sdcard0/Android/obb
Vladdrako said:
Install APKs and put folders with .obb to sdcard0/Android/obb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These WILL NOT WORK.. You must receive a invite from Ms to be a tester . once you install the apps when they start they verify your status.
ALSO Someone posted link to the apps in the Thread I started. (not sure why you started a new one) MS Messaged him and told him to TAKE DOWN THE APP LINKS..
Just giving you a heads up.. Read in the other Thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...icrosoft-office-preview-running-note-t2937536 post 13 i think....
erica_renee said:
These WILL NOT WORK.. You must receive a invite from Ms to be a tester . once you install the apps when they start they verify your status.
ALSO Someone posted link to the apps in the Thread I started. (not sure why you started a new one) MS Messaged him and told him to TAKE DOWN THE APP LINKS..
Just giving you a heads up.. Read in the other Thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...icrosoft-office-preview-running-note-t2937536 post 13 i think....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... Maybe you are right) Because I am at the white list for testing but don't receive an email with the links yet) So, apps working fine on my tablet)
Vladdrako said:
Hmmm... Maybe you are right) Because I am at the white list for testing but don't receive an email with the links yet) So, apps working fine on my tablet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes there are some post on the yammer Forum about this . Some are having trouble getting the d/load links after they get the Tester approval email. Some have reported that they open the email With IE ON THERE Desktop. then push the apps to there Device from play store..
In the email there is a Button at the bottom Below the app links. You must click that before you will get the links to download. That button should be above the apps..
Hope this helps you..
erica_renee said:
These WILL NOT WORK.. You must receive a invite from Ms to be a tester . once you install the apps when they start they verify your status.
ALSO Someone posted link to the apps in the Thread I started. (not sure why you started a new one) MS Messaged him and told him to TAKE DOWN THE APP LINKS..
Just giving you a heads up.. Read in the other Thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...icrosoft-office-preview-running-note-t2937536 post 13 i think....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested them on my father's note 3 and they worked well after changing resolution but I don't enter microsoft account
I didn't see your thread before.
I wanted to introduce something but I'm sorry
mysarasaid said:
I wanted to introduce something but I'm sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome TO XDA.. Preview- pre release software and distributing it can sometimes be a Gray area. BUT With Microsoft. They frown on seeing it anywhere except on there site. This is so they can track users and User hardware its being ran on....
I Do not care about the extra thread being created. XDA mods are the ones who get upset over that at times. I was just trying to save you the hassle of MS Or xda taking your links down ..
Its all Good.. We all have to be careful when it comes to software and apps Links.
So... Ads, ads and ads. Finally Adguard Premium has let me down on the "Ads Front." So I decided to download Android Studio, took forever to find sdk 23 (complete) but did, cloned Adhell 3 source into build and "POOF" out came a "app-debug.apk." (Adhell 3) Grabed knox license and all is well on my s5. Crazy cause MinMinGuard apparently is up to no good. Here is screen shot. No ads or redirects. just thought I would share my new ad-free experience with you.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
Another cool new feature of Adhell 3 is that you can disable specific apps from using mobile data. (a feature that I believe should be built-in stock android; LineageOS has it)
could you share the .apk sir? so we can edit package name via editor pro.
Could you link the host file?
Here's a guy who hosted it and the thread it was in here if it's not working let me know, I have it saved too
If anyone was wondering, the updated README.md on https://github.com/fusionjack/adhell3 says:
-# adhell3
+## Move to gitlab.com
+You know where to find and you need to be registered there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yanchev said:
Could you link the host file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i were you, i would register at gitlab to get latest source. for example, the block url address was changed so basically if the old url is in there, well, don't exhist anymore, no more block list, like empty host file. its not hard to build, he provides clear steps on his gitlab page.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
dhopack said:
could you share the .apk sir? so we can edit package name via editor pro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even better, new SABS
https://github.com/GoldenKappa/notSABS
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
Any way to get pre made apk? I would then change its name with APK Editor Pro and add my knox, or I need to do that when making the app with android studio?
mankvl said:
Any way to get pre made apk? I would then change its name with APK Editor Pro and add my knox, or I need to do that when making the app with android studio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, obviously you did not try the link I provided.
go to the link that I posted. You have a choice to download either or as in compiled or not.
oh yeah, make sure to view the page in desktop version.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
1droidmod said:
yes, obviously you did not try the link I provided.
go to the link that I posted. You have a choice to download either or as in compiled or not.
oh yeah, make sure to view the page in desktop version.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using notSABS, all good, thanks. Just wanted to try Adhell 3
mankvl said:
I'am using notSABS, all good, thanks. Just wanted to try Adhell 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SORRY!!
was assuming u were asking about notSABS, not adhell3.
2 b honest with you, notSABS is working better for me as adhell 3 force closes here and there, was pretty annoying.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
Any changes in 1.0.0 other than the rebirth?
Hello, could I ask if you know who is the official dev of Adhell3?
I would LOVE to see sub-service control for Google Play Services. The idea of hiding it is apparently to protect the users, but system services is exactly what needs to be controlled the most.
Could you please, pretty please, somehow release a version that also lists system apps when viewing service control? I am sick and tired of GPS drain and the way I could control that in Android 7 was by disabling a significant number of them (mostly analytic/datamining-related services, and some location services).
Alternatively, I might try to re-build the app with this modification myself, but I am nowhere near as good in java to do that yet. If the dev can see this - please give us more control. And THANK YOU for giving us any kind of sub-service and permission control at all. Nobody else did this for us since Oreo. THANKS!!
Bobzee said:
Hello, could I ask if you know who is the official dev of Adhell3?
I would LOVE to see sub-service control for Google Play Services. The idea of hiding it is apparently to protect the users, but system services is exactly what needs to be controlled the most.
Could you please, pretty please, somehow release a version that also lists system apps when viewing service control? I am sick and tired of GPS drain and the way I could control that in Android 7 was by disabling a significant number of them (mostly analytic/datamining-related services, and some location services).
Alternatively, I might try to re-build the app with this modification myself, but I am nowhere near as good in java to do that yet. If the dev can see this - please give us more control. And THANK YOU for giving us any kind of sub-service and permission control at all. Nobody else did this for us since Oreo. THANKS!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same name here as in Gitlab.
It's a simple change in Android Studio for what you're looking for if you build the app itself. It's just changing 1 line.
Too bad that adhell 3 doesn't have a Dark or Black mode - Was really easy to install & get it verified ?
I'm still using notSABS on of my devices & BK Manager on another - Not really sure if there's much (if any) difference between notSABS & adhell 3....? ?
Sent from my Galaxy S9+ using XDA Labs
I see quite a bit of misinformation in this and similar threads. Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn
Mike B. said:
I see quite a bit of misinformation in this and similar threads. Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adhell3=Old News
I have been using adguard premium for months now and I would have to say it how much better application for blocking ads and unwanted spyware being tracked, etc.
EDIT:I'm only speaking on my personal experience I'm not trying to down talk adhell3 in anyway
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
How can I remove blocks which I had before the key has expired?
1droidmod said:
Adhell3=Old News
I have been using adguard premium for months now and I would have to say it how much better application for blocking ads and unwanted spyware being tracked, etc.
EDIT:I'm only speaking on my personal experience I'm not trying to down talk adhell3 in anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since Adhell3 is no longer under active development, it matters little, but they are two different animals. Adhell is/was merely a tool to configure the underlying Knox firewall and YOU decided what it should and should not block. While Adguard's DNS server is one of the suggested alternatives, the full Adguard app gives you only very limited choices and uses additional resources.
---------- Post added at 10:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 PM ----------
Dragon31337 said:
How can I remove blocks which I had before the key has expired?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply uninstall Adhell and your Knox settings will revert to default.
I tried all new versions of Uc browser but i am still using 10.8.0, because we can resume download by changing links. App size and response are good too, but there are some issues . Like limitation of 10 tabs, asking permission every time you play a video.
So i was wondering if we can edit old version to open 20 tabs like new version or we can copy paste some file from new version to do that, in apk editor pro (android).
If removing video play permission and disabling cloud download option is possible, that will be a plus.
Plz only reply on this topic. Dont reply like use new version or that browser or something else.
vikass17 said:
I tried all new versions of Uc browser but i am still using 10.8.0, because we can resume download by changing links..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't use this browser myself and there's no way to apply the changes from the new release to an older version without the source code from places like Github and others.
You may be able to obtain some member guidance within the following threads that's specific to the UC Browser.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3086944
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3239911
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3111471
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3150284
I'll check to see if there's additional threads regarding the Tab Limitations and if it can be modified but, while I do, see if you can obtain some member guidance within one of the above tabs.
I don't do this often and it may take some time before i can get to it...
_____
@vikass17, There's approx 30+ versions between the version your currently using and latest release.
If you go to the following link...
https://www.apkmirror.com/uploads/?q=uc-browser
... There's a list of them all.
I know that this may take time but, it would actually be quicker for you to go through them and see if there's a version where this Tab Limitation stops.
Please let me know which one...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
I have checked all versions. This was the last version where they supported download resume by creating dltemp files, from that you can resume download even after months by changing links.
I used the exact site for trying all versions.
vikass17 said:
I have checked all versions. .........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the threads that I had last provided you work on the new version of the UC Browser?
I believe all of them have a way to resume a download for this browser.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
Ibuprophen said:
Does the threads that I had last provided you work on the new version of the UC Browser?
I believe all of them have a way to resume a download for this browser.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, i checked latest version download resume is back, but still if it's possible i want to use old version. Modified version gives a sense of pride too (if you know what i mean
In newer versions size is gone 41mb from 16 mb, there are too many ads (like free mx player) everywhere, and some minor features are missing. All this makes older version more attractive.
And i wanted to know for sure if its really possible or not, so i can try on other apps.
I have done simple things like changing background or sounds, removing ads and some features with moderate success (and it really feels nice). Its like a version of app just for you.
vikass17 said:
In newer versions size is gone 41mb from 16 mb, there are too many..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like this feature cannot be modified on the current version because of the DRM Security they placed within the app.
This security makes it a challenge because of the Kotlin dependencies that are still being worked on by iBotPeaches for the Apktool.
I may not be able to do much besides changing the version of the older working one to the current version.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.