Database Info

Netflix update 1.3 works on sidekick 4g

Just as thread title says. At least on ayoteddy's gingerclone rom.
Just go find the apk, install, and enjoy!
Sent from my Sidekick 4G using XDA App

Your the man.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA App

Netflix from the market seems to be working on a lot of devices. About time.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App

Newest modded version WORKS!!! get the mod version (allows rotation Portrait and landscape for selection and viewing)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15842277#post15842277
Netflix-Rotation-Black-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Blue-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Green-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Orange-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Pink-V1.3.apk
Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk
(select the color to chage the splash screen color)
Warning - first time loading it takes a LONG time to load up. be patient. Reboot phone if needed. But it DOES work (and this is BEFORE the new Firmware update)

please delete this post - duplicate

How exactly do I install the apk? Download to my SD card then what?

Download any apk installer from the market. I use easy-installer. Make sure you delete any other versions of netflix before you install the modded apk.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA App

I use Astro File Manager (free app). Dolphin browser (also free app) does great with downloads from the web. I then Open Astro, Use Astro's Search feature to search for "apk" or "netflix", then you can install the APK file from there.

Probably a very stupid question, but can't seem to access the thread for NetFlix App.
ncmacasl said:
Newest modded version WORKS!!! get the mod version (allows rotation Portrait and landscape for selection and viewing)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15842277#post15842277
Netflix-Rotation-Black-V1.3.apk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I'm quite sure this is an utterly stupid question, but I've dug around in the FAQ's and the general forums and can't see an answer so I'm going to risk being flamed as a noob to ask. When I try loading the link (above) for the Netflix app, I consistently get a message that I do not have permission to access the page, and that new users (with under 10 posts) aren't permitted to POST to the Devel forums.
I'm not trying to post - just to access the thread, and since it says "To encourage this new Users can read but not post in these forums." I assume that I should be able to view the thread. Am I missing something incredibly stupid and obvious, or doing something wrong, or is it just that you're unable to even view anything in the development-related forums until you have more than 10 posts?
Thanks to anyone who is kind enough to reply and open my eyes on this. If you really want to flame me for being a noob feel free, but it won't bother me any. I know my status, and my limits.
Adios!

Yeah, I hated their noob restrictions. I have uploaded the RED version to SugarSync (like DropBox)
If you want a different color, let me know and I will send it there, too. (using the same link, which links to the Folder, not the file)
https://www.sugarsync.com/share/c0a2jsq50cb47

Thanks ncmacasl, I appreciate it!
The red is fine, that's the version I was looking for anyways. I wouldn't have minded it as much if it were clear that it was part of the noob restrictions, but it seemed like the message was saying two different things so I wasn't sure.
Thanks for the help!

WARNING - someone havcked my sugar sync folder and replaced
from "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk"
to "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3 (by <my email address>).apk"
by someone named "Raul Carr <[email protected]>"
I assume he hacked it and added a virus or something. I changed it back, added more security to the file and removed him from membership. If you downloaded this 2nd version by mistake, please go back to the original version.

I downloaded Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk & it worked fine for me .
ncmacasl said:
WARNING - someone havcked my sugar sync folder and replaced
from "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3.apk"
to "Netflix-Rotation-Red-V1.3 (by <my email address>).apk"
by someone named "Raul Carr <[email protected]>"
I assume he hacked it and added a virus or something. I changed it back, added more security to the file and removed him from membership. If you downloaded this 2nd version by mistake, please go back to the original version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

ncmacasl said:
Yeah, I hated their noob restrictions. I have uploaded the RED version to SugarSync (like DropBox)
If you want a different color, let me know and I will send it there, too. (using the same link, which links to the Folder, not the file)
https://www.sugarsync.com/share/c0a2jsq50cb47
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link Expired -- Here is new link (not sure how long it will last)
https://www.sugarsync.com/join/shar...ail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sharefolder https://www.sugarsync.com/join/shar...ail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sharefolder
If it stops working, PM me with an email address for an invite!

[Request] Community Adobe Flash Player Archive...

As anyone should know, today is the last day Adobe Flash player can be downloaded or installed from the Android Market (Google Play Sex Store).
Knowing this, I haven't seen any "archive" thread put up of current versions for phone/tablet/phablet, that way, after the fact, people can still come and download/install Adobe Flash even it isnt from the Market.
My request then is for anyone with a device to upload the current .apk they have for Adobe Flash Player with version # so we can keep the gates open for those who need/want the Flash player. Ill start off with my the one from my device. Please feel free to follow the naming convention I use. (AirDroid makes this REALLY easy)
Last note: Please dont waste posts with "outdated" or "pointless activity", I myself still make use of several sites with Flash as well as many friends/family and even clients with Android devices. (half of the sites I use flash on offer HTML5... for a fee, and thus flash is FREE)
Attached is the Adobe Flash Player APK from my AT&T Galaxy Note running ICS aka Android v4.0.4
EDIT: ill also go ahead and post it on my Dropbox and on a few file sharing websites tonight once I collect some more versions.

Got a few more ill post tonight when I get the chance, mostly from ICS Phones/Tablets, Need some for Gingerbread if someones got it

It is just an apk..and it is in NUMEROUS places on XDA. Almost every phone forum, and in the Android Apps and Games forum...

lowandbehold said:
It is just an apk..and it is in NUMEROUS places on XDA. Almost every phone forum, and in the Android Apps and Games forum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP wants to create an archive of multiple versions of Flash over multiple versions of Android
Sent from my MB508 using xda premium

gagdude said:
OP wants to create an archive of multiple versions of Flash over multiple versions of Android
Sent from my MB508 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, many people never bothered to read the "current version" info on the adobe flash market page which says that it varies by device/osversion/type...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

Need one for GSIII and ZTE Optik Pad

Razorwindmo46 said:
Need one for GSIII and ZTE Optik Pad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you asking FOR or are you asking IF?
While I cant tell for sure, its possible that versions with the same number are, well, the same, but ill post the MD5's I have to help eliminate dupes.

Attached is the Adobe Flash Player 11 from my Star N8000 running ICS 4.0.3.
By the way, what is the last or latest version that support ICS 4.0.3.
Thanks.

Massive thanks...
Hammerfest said:
As anyone should know, today is the last day Adobe Flash player can be downloaded or installed from the Android Market (Google Play Sex Store).
Knowing this, I haven't seen any "archive" thread put up of current versions for phone/tablet/phablet, that way, after the fact, people can still come and download/install Adobe Flash even it isnt from the Market.
My request then is for anyone with a device to upload the current .apk they have for Adobe Flash Player with version # so we can keep the gates open for those who need/want the Flash player. Ill start off with my the one from my device. Please feel free to follow the naming convention I use. (AirDroid makes this REALLY easy)
Last note: Please dont waste posts with "outdated" or "pointless activity", I myself still make use of several sites with Flash as well as many friends/family and even clients with Android devices. (half of the sites I use flash on offer HTML5... for a fee, and thus flash is FREE)
Attached is the Adobe Flash Player APK from my AT&T Galaxy Note running ICS aka Android v4.0.4
EDIT: ill also go ahead and post it on my Dropbox and on a few file sharing websites tonight once I collect some more versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Felt I had to register just to say thank you.
I just purchased a S.G Note 10.1 and was unaware I could no longer get flash player for it. No online viewing of Match of the Day on BBC Sport website for me
Tried a couple of the browsers in the Play Store but no luck.
A quick Google search pulled up this page. My Note is on 4.0.4 so thought I'd try this apk and 30 seconds later all is well, happy days!! :laugh:

It is not device specific but may work for some
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html

Thanks good app and very useful

Thank you for posting this! i found the version for my device

here is a list of archived version of flash for the help of folks
Code:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html

Cyanogenmod File Manager

I need this app, can someone help.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

blaisecardoz said:
I need this app, can someone help.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets go

drdoulittle said:
lets go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks a ton
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

drdoulittle said:
lets go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks a lot, that came in handy! :good:
Where did you get it from? I noticed it is in version 1.0.2 (see Settings > About), however latest version on CM GitHub (github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/tree/cm-11.0) only says 1.0.1 in its changelog... Did you extract it from a ROM? Any idea why this version (with actualised changelog) cannot be found anywhere on CM infrastructure (gerrit, github...)?

Neitsab said:
Wow thanks a lot, that came in handy! :good:
Where did you get it from? I noticed it is in version 1.0.2 (see Settings > About), however latest version on CM GitHub (github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/tree/cm-11.0) only says 1.0.1 in its changelog... Did you extract it from a ROM? Any idea why this version (with actualised changelog) cannot be found anywhere on CM infrastructure (gerrit, github...)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Extracting from a ROM is the quickest way and most ROMs have 1.0.2 in them.

Lethargy said:
Extracting from a ROM is the quickest way and most ROMs have 1.0.2 in them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean, compared to building from source ? This wasn't the reason why I was asking: I was just trying to find a definitive answer on "what's the latest version of this app", and official source code is always the best option to sort out such enquiry
It seems strange to me that most ROMs have an 1.0.2 version while CM repos don't seem to contain anything higher than 1.0.1 (by changelog comparison). So my question remains: where does that updated version come from?
Cheers

Neitsab said:
You mean, compared to building from source ? This wasn't the reason why I was asking: I was just trying to find a definitive answer on "what's the latest version of this app", and official source code is always the best option to sort out such enquiry
It seems strange to me that most ROMs have an 1.0.2 version while CM repos don't seem to contain anything higher than 1.0.1 (by changelog comparison). So my question remains: where does that updated version come from?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/tree/cm-11.0
You were probably looking at the cm-10.2 branch lol. The default branch of CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager is cm-10.2 if you look here: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/branches

Lethargy said:
You were probably looking at the cm-10.2 branch lol.
[...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought so at first, but if you look at this branch's CHANGELOG.md file, you'll see it hasn't been modified in two years and mentions the "1.0.1" version as the latest one. This is why I've precisely mentioned the branch URL in my first post, but because of my inability to post links you might have overlooked it Thanks for your investigations nonetheless!

Neitsab said:
I thought so at first, but if you look at this branch's CHANGELOG.md file, you'll see it hasn't been modified in two years and mentions the "1.0.1" version as the latest one. This is why I've precisely mentioned the branch URL in my first post, but because of my inability to post links you might have overlooked it Thanks for your investigations nonetheless!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look in AndroidManifest.xml
Didn't see that you already mentioned you looked in cm-11 branch, they just haven't update the changelog but the app that gets compiled is 1.0.2.

Lethargy said:
Look in AndroidManifest.xml
Didn't see that you already mentioned you looked in cm-11 branch, they just haven't update the changelog but the app that gets compiled is 1.0.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, this one does indeed mention 1.0.2! However, where does the changelog entry in the app's "Settings > About" screen come from then?
Version 1.0.2
-------------------
* move bookmarks and history into a navigation drawer (by Florian Edelmann)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The mystery thickens...

Neitsab said:
Thanks, this one does indeed mention 1.0.2! However, where does the changelog entry in the app's "Settings > About" screen come from then?
The mystery thickens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/blob/cm-11.0/res/raw/changelog

Lethargy said:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_CMFileManager/blob/cm-11.0/res/raw/changelog
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn it, I would never have looked at this folder!! What does res/raw stand for? Anyway, thanks a lot Lethargy, mystery solved

Neitsab said:
Damn it, I would never have looked at this folder!! What does res/raw stand for? Anyway, thanks a lot Lethargy, mystery solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
resources -> raw text

Lethargy said:
resources -> raw text
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense Is it a recurring part in any Android app (I'm no dev so pardon the naivety of my question(s))? Still, I believe think they could update that CHANGELOG.md file at some point, that would clear up some confusion...
Do you know of any other good free/libre file manager? Although this one quite pleased me when I discovered Cyanogenmod a few weeks ago (I'm pretty new to Android, just got my first droid phone last month), which is why I wanted to install it on my current OmniROM, it doesn't seem to be actively developed. I'm just wondering which features I could have a need for in the near future that this file manager doesn't offer... Thanks.

I normally use CM App Installer from the play store to get the file manager and the torch app
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Neitsab said:
Makes sense Is it a recurring part in any Android app (I'm no dev so pardon the naivety of my question(s))? Still, I believe think they could update that CHANGELOG.md file at some point, that would clear up some confusion...
Do you know of any other good free/libre file manager? Although this one quite pleased me when I discovered Cyanogenmod a few weeks ago (I'm pretty new to Android, just got my first droid phone last month), which is why I wanted to install it on my current OmniROM, it doesn't seem to be actively developed. I'm just wondering which features I could have a need for in the near future that this file manager doesn't offer... Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this case it's raw text, but you can put images in there as well (any files in fact). Files in res/raw won't be processed/compiled, it'll just be added to the package.
For example, in CMFileManager the changelog (excerpt):
Code:
Version 1.0.2
-------------------
* move bookmarks and history into a navigation drawer (by Florian Edelmann)
If you wanted to use that in strings.xml you would have to put them in <string> tags:
Code:
<string name="changelog">Version 1.0.2
-------------------
* move bookmarks and history into a navigation drawer (by Florian Edelmann)
</string>
(For those reading this in Tapatalk, you can't see the xml tags since it handles it differently)
In some cases it can cause issues, and it's sometimes it's better not to clog up strings.xml with a large amount of text (like this changelog). Also easier to modify in some cases (again, like a changelog).
I use Root Explorer, but it's a paid app. There's a free version but afaik it can't modify files which need root access.

abundantmussel said:
I normally use CM App Installer from the play store to get the file manager and the torch app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, thanks for the tip this looks interesting! However, as the author says in the app description he builds them himself when he has time to do so. Therefore pulling them from a current nightly or latest M release (as Lethargy mentioned) seems to be as good (and that is one less person to rely upon). I also wanted to replace omniROM's Launcher3 by CM's Trebuchet, so I'll have a go at it (thanks to MultiROM ).
Lethargy said:
[...]
I use Root Explorer, but it's a paid app. There's a free version but afaik it can't modify files which need root access.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your explanations, I better understand now.
Concerning the file manager, I'm looking specifically for free/libre software app (as in "open source", but I don't like this expression and prefer to stick to Richard Stallman's definition). A search in F-Droid didn't turn in that many results, so that's why I was asking "at large"... I know many apps on the Play Store are libre software, but because the store doesn't mention their license it gets pretty tricky to find them. I try to always favour free/libre apps when I can.

Neitsab said:
Thanks for your explanations, I better understand now.
Concerning the file manager, I'm looking specifically for free/libre software app (as in "open source", but I don't like this expression and prefer to stick to Richard Stallman's definition). A search in F-Droid didn't turn in that many results, so that's why I was asking "at large"... I know many apps on the Play Store are libre software, but because the store doesn't mention their license it gets pretty tricky to find them. I try to always favour free/libre apps when I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you ever want anything explained feel free to ask me in a PM
I'm not too sure of any others then. :silly: I'd just stick to CM File Manager if you specifically want a decent one that's open source. I just prefer Root Explorer over CM File Manager since it's a little better for root file management and it can access SMB (so I can access files on my PC without bothering to plug in my USB cable so often).
Maybe look around XDA for one.

Lethargy said:
If you ever want anything explained feel free to ask me in a PM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, will do. Thanks for the very amicable offer, I must admit I often find myself quite lost within the Android realm
I'm not too sure of any others then. :silly: I'd just stick to CM File Manager if you specifically want a decent one that's open source. I just prefer Root Explorer over CM File Manager since it's a little better for root file management and it can access SMB (so I can access files on my PC without bothering to plug in my USB cable so often).
Maybe look around XDA for one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense. Well for now I'm indeed fine with CMFM, and I've found a few alternatives thanks to http://alternativeto.net/software/open-manager/?license=opensource&platform=android (still can't post links sorry okay, now it looks like I can, that's nice). XDA forums are such a great resource for anything mobile/telephony related! It is rare that a single website gathers the biggest part of a development community. So great.
Anyway, thanks for your replies!

Does it work on Lollipop?

Adhell 3

So... Ads, ads and ads. Finally Adguard Premium has let me down on the "Ads Front." So I decided to download Android Studio, took forever to find sdk 23 (complete) but did, cloned Adhell 3 source into build and "POOF" out came a "app-debug.apk." (Adhell 3) Grabed knox license and all is well on my s5. Crazy cause MinMinGuard apparently is up to no good. Here is screen shot. No ads or redirects. just thought I would share my new ad-free experience with you.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Another cool new feature of Adhell 3 is that you can disable specific apps from using mobile data. (a feature that I believe should be built-in stock android; LineageOS has it)

could you share the .apk sir? so we can edit package name via editor pro.

Could you link the host file?

Here's a guy who hosted it and the thread it was in here if it's not working let me know, I have it saved too

If anyone was wondering, the updated README.md on https://github.com/fusionjack/adhell3 says:
-# adhell3
+## Move to gitlab.com
+You know where to find and you need to be registered there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Yanchev said:
Could you link the host file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i were you, i would register at gitlab to get latest source. for example, the block url address was changed so basically if the old url is in there, well, don't exhist anymore, no more block list, like empty host file. its not hard to build, he provides clear steps on his gitlab page.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

dhopack said:
could you share the .apk sir? so we can edit package name via editor pro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even better, new SABS
https://github.com/GoldenKappa/notSABS
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Any way to get pre made apk? I would then change its name with APK Editor Pro and add my knox, or I need to do that when making the app with android studio?

mankvl said:
Any way to get pre made apk? I would then change its name with APK Editor Pro and add my knox, or I need to do that when making the app with android studio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, obviously you did not try the link I provided.
go to the link that I posted. You have a choice to download either or as in compiled or not.
oh yeah, make sure to view the page in desktop version.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

1droidmod said:
yes, obviously you did not try the link I provided.
go to the link that I posted. You have a choice to download either or as in compiled or not.
oh yeah, make sure to view the page in desktop version.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using notSABS, all good, thanks. Just wanted to try Adhell 3

mankvl said:
I'am using notSABS, all good, thanks. Just wanted to try Adhell 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SORRY!!
was assuming u were asking about notSABS, not adhell3.
2 b honest with you, notSABS is working better for me as adhell 3 force closes here and there, was pretty annoying.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Any changes in 1.0.0 other than the rebirth?

Hello, could I ask if you know who is the official dev of Adhell3?
I would LOVE to see sub-service control for Google Play Services. The idea of hiding it is apparently to protect the users, but system services is exactly what needs to be controlled the most.
Could you please, pretty please, somehow release a version that also lists system apps when viewing service control? I am sick and tired of GPS drain and the way I could control that in Android 7 was by disabling a significant number of them (mostly analytic/datamining-related services, and some location services).
Alternatively, I might try to re-build the app with this modification myself, but I am nowhere near as good in java to do that yet. If the dev can see this - please give us more control. And THANK YOU for giving us any kind of sub-service and permission control at all. Nobody else did this for us since Oreo. THANKS!!

Bobzee said:
Hello, could I ask if you know who is the official dev of Adhell3?
I would LOVE to see sub-service control for Google Play Services. The idea of hiding it is apparently to protect the users, but system services is exactly what needs to be controlled the most.
Could you please, pretty please, somehow release a version that also lists system apps when viewing service control? I am sick and tired of GPS drain and the way I could control that in Android 7 was by disabling a significant number of them (mostly analytic/datamining-related services, and some location services).
Alternatively, I might try to re-build the app with this modification myself, but I am nowhere near as good in java to do that yet. If the dev can see this - please give us more control. And THANK YOU for giving us any kind of sub-service and permission control at all. Nobody else did this for us since Oreo. THANKS!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same name here as in Gitlab.
It's a simple change in Android Studio for what you're looking for if you build the app itself. It's just changing 1 line.

Too bad that adhell 3 doesn't have a Dark or Black mode - Was really easy to install & get it verified ?
I'm still using notSABS on of my devices & BK Manager on another - Not really sure if there's much (if any) difference between notSABS & adhell 3....? ?
Sent from my Galaxy S9+ using XDA Labs

I see quite a bit of misinformation in this and similar threads. Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn

Mike B. said:
I see quite a bit of misinformation in this and similar threads. Please keep in mind that AdHell3 is NOT supported on XDA. For official and up-to-date information about the AdHell3 project, please visit:
Main repo: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3
Scripts for compiling: https://gitlab.com/fusionjack/adhell3-scripts
Get your EDU ELM key from: https://seap.samsung.com/license-keys/generate/edu
Official Support Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/hfreZum
Dependable(?) precompiled APKs: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/sb37c6gmhqgbn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adhell3=Old News
I have been using adguard premium for months now and I would have to say it how much better application for blocking ads and unwanted spyware being tracked, etc.
EDIT:I'm only speaking on my personal experience I'm not trying to down talk adhell3 in anyway
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

How can I remove blocks which I had before the key has expired?

1droidmod said:
Adhell3=Old News
I have been using adguard premium for months now and I would have to say it how much better application for blocking ads and unwanted spyware being tracked, etc.
EDIT:I'm only speaking on my personal experience I'm not trying to down talk adhell3 in anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since Adhell3 is no longer under active development, it matters little, but they are two different animals. Adhell is/was merely a tool to configure the underlying Knox firewall and YOU decided what it should and should not block. While Adguard's DNS server is one of the suggested alternatives, the full Adguard app gives you only very limited choices and uses additional resources.
---------- Post added at 10:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:04 PM ----------
Dragon31337 said:
How can I remove blocks which I had before the key has expired?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply uninstall Adhell and your Knox settings will revert to default.

[Need Help] xda-labs Web - Invalid Signing Key for App

I recently published a small app named Street Media. Now I wanted to add an update to the app but https://labs.xda-developers.com won't let me add another build. It says invalid signing key for app. I am pretty sure that key is valid because I used the same key when I added the first build.
The same thing happened to me a few days back and then I had to create a new app and submit the update. Also I had to unpublish the older one. But in that scenario I changed the siging key so I thought maybe it needed the same signing key so I created a new app and submitted the apk file but now it is giving me the error again. I use Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 with Xamarin to build the app and it works fine. I am not sure what am I doing wrong while uploading the new build.
Can someone assist me here? It can be a bug within the website but I am not sure. I can provide the apk file if needed. Thank you.

ahmar16 said:
I recently published a small app named Street Media. Now I wanted to add an update to the app but https://labs.xda-developers.com won't let me add another build. It says invalid signing key for app. I am pretty sure that key is valid because I used the same key when I added the first build.
The same thing happened to me a few days back and then I had to create a new app and submit the update. Also I had to unpublish the older one. But in that scenario I changed the siging key so I thought maybe it needed the same signing key so I created a new app and submitted the apk file but now it is giving me the error again. I use Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 with Xamarin to build the app and it works fine. I am not sure what am I doing wrong while uploading the new build.
Can someone assist me here? It can be a bug within the website but I am not sure. I can provide the apk file if needed. Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That error message is regarding the different signatures you used to sign the app currently on the Labs Store and the one you're trying to upload.
If you used a different signature key, than the last one currently on the Labs Store, to sign the app your trying to upload, then you will need to either sign the current one with the same signature key as the last one OR remove all the app versions currently on the Labs Store in order to upload the current version with the new key.
I hope that I had explained this okay via text... :thumbup:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.

Ibuprophen said:
That error message is regarding the different signatures you used to sign the app currently on the Labs Store and the one you're trying to upload.
If you used a different signature key, than the last one currently on the Labs Store, to sign the app your trying to upload, then you will need to either sign the current one with the same signature key as the last one OR remove all the app versions currently on the Labs Store in order to upload the current version with the new key.
I hope that I had explained this okay via text... :thumbup:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time. I used the same signing key as I did for the first build. I also checked it with the apksigntool and the apk is signed properly.
So according to your suggestion I should remove the first build completely from the app page and then add the next build again to remove this warning. I'll experiment with it and report back.
Update:
It did not resolve the issue. I tried to delete the existing build and then when I uploaded a new one it still showed the error so I just created a new app and uploaded the new build there. Maybe someone needs to look into it.

ahmar16 said:
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm...
Maybe @Wood Man can provide some clarity or refer someone else who can?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.

ahmar16 said:
Thank you for replying. I think I explained above that I didn't use another signing key this time. I used the same signing key as I did for the first build. I also checked it with the apksigntool and the apk is signed properly.
So according to your suggestion I should remove the first build completely from the app page and then add the next build again to remove this warning. I'll experiment with it and report back.
Update:
It did not resolve the issue. I tried to delete the existing build and then when I uploaded a new one it still showed the error so I just created a new app and uploaded the new build there. Maybe someone needs to look into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you can start by reading around this post in case it could help: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/labs-t3241866/post74890303
Maybe the package name could be the culprit? Or something else?
If no luck, you can try to send a PM blk_jack.

Wood Man said:
Maybe you can start by reading around this post in case it could help..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the Package Name but, would a "Signature Key" error be a result of a different Package Name?
It would be great (if it were possible) to have some type of listing of Labs Store error messages and what they would entail.
Maybe this would fall into @blk_jack area or even the Technical Area that @bitpushr would know. I've got a feeling that this may already exist... LMAO!!!
Thank you very much for responding My Friend!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unless asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Apple Macintosh.

Well thank you for your time guys. I have not changed package name or any properties in the package except the version codes. But I also found out that Xamarin does a weird thing while signing the apk. If you create a new keystore with full name and other properties it only recognises the full name in it and ignores other properties while signing the apk. So every time it will sign the app with DN: CN=Full Name and thats it but I also had the C=PK with it and that never gets added. This is one of the reasons why it shows the apk has been signed differently.
Anyway it is a problem with Xamarin but it signs the apk properly in any case. So now I'd just PM the mentioned person and see what they have to say about it. Thank you again.

Same issue, is there a way to upload my new build with new signature?
Because I lost my old signature
Edit: I found a solution for that.
The solution is unpublish the project that you can't upload a new build and create a new one in developer admin console and upload your new build signed with your new key signature. Its my workaround for now.