Hey, I just wanted to know why hasn't GSMArena updated the part of this page:
https://www.gsmarena.com/honor_play-9230.php
Where it shows "country specific" variants of the phone but only lists the Chinese model, when we have UK models for example (COR-L29) which I have. Who needs to update it, or is it community driven like wikipedia?
Thanks :good:
Related
I happen to go through my google reader this morning and found an interesting article on Softpedia about Android 2.2 coming to Galaxy S in more markets. It is a very interesting read. Has anyone heard anymore info about this topic? The update will supposedly be available on the samsung website.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Android-2-2-Froyo-on-Galaxy-S-in-More-Markets-166602.shtml
Here is the original post about the froyo update
http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-brief/52521-samsung-galaxy-s-finally-gets-its-turn-with-android-22
I guess this topic is already being talked about in this thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=840573
This update is not for the US market but for everyone else. I found this comment on the Galaxy S twitter page:
@imms0fat Hi Rich. Thx for that article. It refers to non-US phones. Samsung USA and TMO should release 2.2 by the end of the year.
So us US folks are left in the cold til years end
Hi all,
I'm looking for information about that chinese smartphone, the Feiyang F7100+ which I saw on an enough known chinese exporter (at least by european customers, mixeshop).
It looks like similar to several current chinese phones with 5.3" QHD display, 1G RAM/4G ROM, and MTK6589 cpu, but while Google points out to several information about the Zopo 910/Caesar A9600/Hero H9500 variants, or about those ALPS/Star/Feiteng/Cubot and the likes, apparently there's about nothing about this "vendor", Feiyang. I've asked some info the the shop itself, but I have not yet received replies. Eventually I've used the phone name to perform a search on XDA but without luck (obviously it is possible that I have done something wrong in doing so).
Well, its most distinctive feature (with reference to the quoted more known "mates") is just an integrated capacitive pen, as seen on several Galaxy Note II chinese clones, as the Bluebo N7105 and the likes. Besides, one competitor of the above quoted shop says that the Feiyang F7100+ is not a 5.3" QHD but a 5.5" HD phone (weird...).
So, has anyone never heard of that Feiyang F7100+? In case, where I can find any sort of support or information about official/custom ROMs, rooting and so on? Otherwise to which more known smartphone that Feiyang F7100+ should be nearly identical?
Thanks in advance for sharing, and please forgive me for my not so good english,
best regards,
Luca
ITALY
UP! :angel:
UP!
UP! :fingers-crossed:
UP! :crying:
UP! :cyclops:
You will find nothing here. Clone device break the GPL and in doing so break XDA rules.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Hi everyone,
I maintain a firmware archive for all Nexus and "Google Experience" devices from the OG Droid up through present day. Now that I'm a GS4 owner, I've decided to start archiving Galaxy S4 firmware for US variants on my site as well. As I'm not as familiar with Samsung naming conventions and terminology as I am with Google ROMs, I was hoping some of you Samsung software junkies out there could take a look at my pages to make sure I'm using all my terminology correctly.
Here is a sample Nexus firmware page: http://www.randomphantasmagoria.com/firmware/nexus-7.
Here is my new Galaxy S4 page: http://www.randomphantasmagoria.com/firmware/galaxy-s4.
Make sure to click through to the detail pages.
My rule for the firmware archives are that I do not deal with unofficial stuff whatsoever. I don't do leaked ROMs or anything of the like. I only archive whatever was officially released to the general public, both shipping on new devices and OTA updates. The idea is to be able to follow the strict official release chain from launch to end-of-life. Also, all firmware is indexed on the site by the official firmware name in build.prop.
As you can see, right now I only have a page up for the AT&T I337 variant (the one I own). Right now, I'm displaying the Android version, build, PDA, CSC, links to the ODIN packages and links to the OTA updates if available. Are there any other pieces of info you think I should show on those detail pages? Also, I'm showing the OTA updates as "<new> from <old>" which is how Google names its OTA files. I know that Samsung sometimes does "<old> to <new>" (especially in the yakju(xx) OTA files for the Galaxy Nexus). Which one do you guys think I should go with?
Any feedback you guys could provide would be greatly appreciated. Once I've settled on a final layout, I'll create pages for Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile, and US Cellular. I'll also add pages for Cricket and C Spire when those devices actually launch. Why am I only doing US devices? Because there are a lot of international device variants and each one of them can have a ton of different firmware variants depending on the country in which it was purchased. It's way too much for one man to manage. Managing 7 US variants will be enough work as it is. haha
So anyway, click around and please provide feedback.
Thank you!
Hi everyone,
I maintain a firmware archive for all Nexus and "Google Experience" devices from the OG Droid up through present day. Now that I'm a GS4 owner, I've decided to start archiving Galaxy S4 firmware for US variants on my site as well. As I'm not as familiar with Samsung naming conventions and terminology as I am with Google ROMs, I was hoping some of you Samsung software junkies out there could take a look at my pages to make sure I'm using all my terminology correctly.
Here is a sample Nexus firmware page: http://www.randomphantasmagoria.com/firmware/nexus-7.
Here is my new Galaxy S4 page: http://www.randomphantasmagoria.com/firmware/galaxy-s4.
Make sure to click through to the detail pages.
My rule for the firmware archives are that I do not deal with unofficial stuff whatsoever. I don't do leaked ROMs or anything of the like. I only archive whatever was officially released to the general public, both shipping on new devices and OTA updates. The idea is to be able to follow the strict official release chain from launch to end-of-life. Also, all firmware is indexed on the site by the official firmware name in build.prop.
As you can see, right now I only have a page up for the AT&T I337 variant (the one I own). Right now, I'm displaying the Android version, build, PDA, CSC, links to the ODIN packages and links to the OTA updates if available. Are there any other pieces of info you think I should show on those detail pages? Also, I'm showing the OTA updates as "<new> from <old>" which is how Google names its OTA files. I know that Samsung sometimes does "<old> to <new>" (especially in the yakju(xx) OTA files for the Galaxy Nexus). Which one do you guys think I should go with?
Any feedback you guys could provide would be greatly appreciated. Once I've settled on a final layout, I'll create pages for Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile, and US Cellular. I'll also add pages for Cricket and C Spire when those devices actually launch. Why am I only doing US devices? Because there are a lot of international device variants and each one of them can have a ton of different firmware variants depending on the country in which it was purchased. It's way too much for one man to manage. Managing 7 US variants will be enough work as it is. haha
So anyway, click around and please provide feedback.
Thank you!
I Found A Page Where They Posted That Android 8.0 Oreo Is Out On G4 Plus In Australia & New Zealand
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/android-8...oto-g5s-g5s-plus-moto-z-z-play-z2-play-759602
https://www.msn.com/en-in/lifestyle...g5s-g5s-plus-moto-z-z-play-z2-play/vp-BBILqAt
Idk if it is true
jaxx08 said:
I Found A Page Where They Posted That Android 8.0 Oreo Is Out On G4 Plus In Australia & New Zealand
https://www.ibtimes.co.in/android-8...oto-g5s-g5s-plus-moto-z-z-play-z2-play-759602
https://www.msn.com/en-in/lifestyle...g5s-g5s-plus-moto-z-z-play-z2-play/vp-BBILqAt
Idk if it is true
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a month old news and many one believe it's fake news.
Also old thread exist for same news, see discussion here : https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/moto-g4-spotted-running-android-8-0-t3763994
____Mdd said:
That's a month old news and many one believe it's fake news.
Also old thread exist for same news, see discussion here : https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/moto-g4-spotted-running-android-8-0-t3763994
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That thread is different, i posted one that shows it is released in Australia and New Zealand & it that contains discussion about screenshot, maybe this one will be right, who knows
Always post the original news story, not the reprinted ones, look at the links embedded in their "story":
https://ausdroid.net/2018/02/05/motorola-rolling-oreo-large-number-phones-today/
Article is from February 05 that the other outlets "recycled". Same one that was discussed here previously.
Also the statement from Moto/Lenovo is for mainly the Moto X4 and has a double * on the list next to G4 Plus. That says:
"**In addition to the N upgrade it has already received, we will be upgrading moto g4 Plus to Android O. Because this is an unplanned upgrade, it will take some time to fit into our schedule, we’ll update our software upgrade page when we have more info."
So... nothing new. It's not now, it "will take some time".
SoNic67 said:
...
"**In addition to the N upgrade it has already received, we will be upgrading moto g4 Plus to Android O. Because this is an unplanned upgrade, it will take some time to fit into our schedule, we’ll update our software upgrade page when we have more info."
So... nothing new. It's not now, it "will take some time".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In AICP changelog for April 1st they mention Android O blobs (Nikit), I wonder where they come from ...
or maybe that's a mis-interpretation ...
(or maybe an April 1st fool's joke )