{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Smartphone photography has made tremendous progress in recent years, especially in camera sensors -- the soul of any digital camera. Camera sensors determine the clarity of your photos and how large you can scale them up. From 300,000 pixels many years ago, to today’s highest 48 million pixels, sensors have advanced at an astonishing speed, and smartphone cameras now rival even high-performance SLR cameras.
Sony IMX586 and Samsung GM1 are the only two 48-megapixel sensors in smartphones on the market today. Although both are technically 48MP sensors, their capabilities are not equal, as image quality depends not only on the number of pixels, but also how the pixels are arranged. When this is taken into account, Sony IMX586 has the edge, as it is able to transform its pixel structure to achieve true 48MP photography. On the other hand, Samsung GM1 behaves more like a 12MP sensor due to its less effective pixel arrangement.
To understand the difference, we need to understand how a sensor captures light and creates an image. There are millions of picture elements (pixels) on an image sensor. Pixels can detect the intensity of light, but they cannot distinguish colors. An image sensor without color filters can only produce black-and-white photos.
To produce color photos, the RGB color model is used – in which red, green and blue light are added together in various ways to reproduce a broad array of colors. One method is to put red, green, and blue filters in front of three image sensors respectively and combine the images to create one photo. But this is not practical for smartphones, as it makes the cameras very bulky and expensive.
In 1974, Bryce Bayer invented the Bayer filter which employs what is called the "Bayer Pattern," a checkerboard-like arrangement of red, green, and blue pixels on a square grid of photosensors. This pattern of filters is placed on top of a single image sensor to make each pixel respond to either red, green, or blue light, allowing digital cameras to capture vivid color images. Then, a computing process known as demosaicing converts the detected image to a single full-color image. Most digital image sensors use the Bayer filter today.
Both Sony and Samsung sensors use Bayer filter arrays to capture light and produce photos.
Traditional Bayer arrays use a 2x2 array (2 green, 1 blue and 1 red). The Sony IMX586 sensor uses the Quad Bayer color filter array, where adjacent 2x2 pixels are arranged in the same color, making high-sensitivity shooting possible. During low light shooting, the signals from the four adjacent pixels are added, raising the sensitivity to a level equivalent to that of 1.6 μm pixels (12 megapixels), resulting in bright, low noise images.
When shooting bright scenes, such as an outdoor environment during daytime, the built-in, original signal processing function performs array conversion (see diagram below), making it possible to obtain high-definition 48 effective megapixel images in real time. Thus, the Sony IMX586 can produce true 48MB photos.
Based upon the data revealed by Samsung, the GM1 sensor adopts a similar Quad Bayer color filter. But it lacks a conversion mechanism, so every 2x2 array can only recognize one color and output data together. As a result, while the Samsung GM1 sensor has 48 megapixels, it actually behaves like a 12-effective megapixel sensor. According to the specifications, the GM1 sensor can only support photo resolution up to 4000×3000, i.e. 12 megapixels.
The main difference between the Sony IMX586 and Samsung GM1 sensors is that the former can produce true 48-megapixel photos by transforming its pixel structure, while the latter lacks this capability. In the end, photos produced by the Sony IMX586 are superior, having higher resolution and clarity, and retaining more details even after zooming.
Nice info
But still, Quad Bayer to normal Bayer conversion isn't effective,
Sony sensor is better for 2x digital zoom with 12mp resolution, while Samsung will give a cropped 4mp
Related
Hi all!
All ok?!
I create this small text for a Brazilian Android Forum, called BrasilDroid, so I would put here in XDA too.
It is about the quality of our cellphones cameras and the quality of them.
A lot of definitions :
What is Photography ?
Literaly is write with light. The term is derived from Greek. photos(light) and graphos (drawing). So, the basic premise for take a picture is... Light!
What we need to take a photo?
For take a picture we need a camera with lens and film, that in digital photography is the camera sensor.
Pixel and Resolution
If we make a enlarge expansion in a photo we see various square points that make the image, this points are called Pixel. This is the minor measure that we have in our photos.
The photo resolution are directy connected to the Pixel. In a photo that have dimensions of 1920x1080 your resolution is 2,736,800 px or 2.1mpx.
Roughly, resolution is the photo area.
Quality vs Pixel
Many peoples confuse the camera quality with the amount of megapixel available.
But, quality not linked with quantity.
The Camera quality is linked direct to height of sensor and how the sensor handles the lack of light.
When we pont our camera for the scene and shoot a "curten" open and leave the sensor exposed to light. In this moment the sensor catch the light. Immediately after the "curten" close and the image is recorded.
While the obturator(the name of "curten") is open the sensor is capturing the light, so, smaller the area for capture minus details can be captured and more digital interference need to be used to create the image.
Let us consider two sensors:
Sensor 1 - 7x5mm.
Sensor 2 - 20x14mm.
These sensors be in two diferents cameras with 5mpx of resolution.
When we take a photo in 1920x1080 (Full HD) the sensor try capture the light of all scene usin 2.1 milions of points.
In First Sensor the pixel be very close, the area is smaller, making the size of these pixel be small, soon, the amount of detail that each of these pixels will be store are small.
In Second Sensor the pixels be more separated, the area is bigger, the pixels can capture mor information of the light.
The final image will be the same resolution in each sensors, but, the sensor two store more information. Considering the size of this sensors, Sensor two will store three times more information.
In other words, a small sensor need perform a big effort for store all information, are many pixels in a small area. This makes the camera need interfere in capture, generating small points between the pixels. In these moment we have other problem ... Grain...
So, for what serve the pixel ?
Enlarge.
The more megapixel used in a photo greater be your dimension, so, more we can enlarge the picture keeping the proportion without loose information.
Why the photos look better on cellphone than on the computer?
That we see in screen of cell is basically a photo in a lower resolution than the real resolution, these lower resolution hide photos imperfections and some LCDs can make a bigger shine or contrast in the photos, like the AMOLED.
How to take better photos with cell ?
1 - Don't use the max megapixel
If you are shoot with cell, certainly, be a big image don't is your objective, so, you can take photos in small resolution. In Cell with 5.0mpx take a picture with 3.2mpx only bring gain...
2 - ISO
If the camera have manual ISO, try to use the lower ISO number, the higher ISO more digital inteference, and more grain...
But, the low ISO makes the scene need more light.
3 - Prefer shooting statics objects or don't shake
Most of cellphones don't allows the manual configuration of Obturator Speed. The camera software try to choice the better speed for the scene.
The phone try balance the speed with ISO and aperture, many times the speed is going down. And slow speed is synonymous of blur photo.
How to get around this? If possible, increase the ISO or increase the exposure compensation. And let the phone as still as possible.
4 - Using flash
Flash, very polemic, but, in cell cameras can be a great ally.
When use the flash your light make that the scene freeze, reducing very much the slow speed problem.
Obvious, xeon flash is better than Led.
5 - Modify the pr proportion
Case the camera be proportion adjust try choice the best of each photo.
Proportion 4:3 = 1.333
Proportion 3:2 = 1.5
Proportion 16:9 = 1.77
To calculate the proportion just divide the bigger side by smaller.
Para calcular a proporção é só dividir o lado maior pelo lado menor.
A Photo with 2048x1536 px be : 2048 / 1536 ~= 1.333
So, the resolution 2048x1536 have proportion 4:3.
To improve the photos working with the proportion the best way is using photo's editors.
Size of Sensors:
Digital Cameras :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(http://www.iif.com.br/site/2010/10/mitos-verdade-digital/)
Iphone and S3
(https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2708421/+200)
They noted that the lower sensor of a digital camera 1/2.5 (0.4) is ~ 25% higher than the sensor of Galaxy S3 1/3.2 (0.31)?
Guys, it is clear that we can take great pictures with our cell phones, however, the limitation of the hardware and the sensor will always do that to that quality is not expected.
After all that, you imagine how absurd it is to have a mobile phone with 41mpx resolution?
A decent camera, that resolution costs over $ 20,000 and has a huge sensor, called medium format!
I propose a challenge. I take two pictures with my Ace 2. One with 5.0mpx and other with 3.2mpx. Both are in the ratio 4:3 with 100% Crop.
which of the photos was made with 5.0mpx and what was done with 3.2mpx?
Photo one :
Photo two:
That is, questions, suggestions ... and let the discussion!
:laugh::good:
I was trying several mobile phones these days and got interested in displays. The following is what i've learned from my experiences plus online information:
It is a very easy work to tell the quality of a display, whether it is equipped on a TV or computer, or a smartphone. Just start up the device, have a look at the user interface, and you’ll get a rough impression, which, in most cases, is true to truth in the end. But there is always someone playing tricks to convince you that his display, which is not good in fact, is good, especially on the Internet.
While most people may not trust advertising maps made by CorelDraw or perfected by Photoshop, reviews do have influence on their choices. If you are going to buy a cheap phone from China, online reviews may be the only path for consultations. Unfortunately, neither all customer reviews come from real customers, nor all professional reviewers tell the whole truth.
For example, two phones with different display resolutions don’t look too different in a photo taken beyond a certain distance. Resolution, such as 1280x720 pixels, means the number of color points (pixels) that compose an image. The more pixels, the more details of a picture are shown, but when the distance between your eyes and the screen is long, the details are not so distinguishable. In most cases, we use mobile phones in a close distance.
A little theoretical? OK, I’ll compare two phones of the same 5-inch screen size but different resolutions for demonstration, namely, Axgio Neon N1 with 1280 x 720 display (HD or 720p) and THL T6S with 854x480 (480P).
I downloaded a 1920x1080 (Full HD or 1080P) picture from the Web and put its copies into both the two phones aforementioned. It’s hard to see how the Neon N1 has better performance than T6S in the first photo when my camera was held a little far from them. But in the second photo, the grass is sharp on Axgio Neon N1’s HD display, while it is a mass on THL T6S.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Well, apart from grass, there are some scenes with smooth surface to obscure the gap between high and low resolutions even in close look, such as the sea. Smooth surface means that the colors of neighboring pixels are very similar or the same, thus the reduction in pixels may not affect the visual impressions very much.
But believe me, your eyes are more sensitive than cameras to such changes, which can be better defined in macro photos. Now you can see that the Neon N1’s 720P display has high integrity while there is mosaic with the T6S’ 480P resolution.
An HD display has about 900 thousand pixels ( 1,280x720=921,600), while a 480P display has only 400 thousand. Apparently, pixels are one time more closely arranged on a 720p display, where it’s not very easy to distinguish one pixel from others. On the other hand, there is no doubt that 480P or 540P (QHD, 960x540) screens deliver granules to your eyes in daily use.
Macro photos may be the best way to show display quality in the aspect of sharpness. For example, displays with the same face-value resolution may have varied performance in practice, while a responsible reviewer may use macro photos to make the disparity visible.
OK, let me add a 1080P display from Huawei Honor 6 before my close-up lens for a conclusion: 480P and QHD, with obvious granules; 720P HD, smooth; 1080P FHD, impressive.
I didn’t mean to say THL T6S was equipped with a bad display. On the contrary, it performs quite well at its native resolution among Chinese phones, just like Axgio Neon N1 and Huawei Honor 6.
Besides real resolution, another factor that concerns users is color. If you ever got interested in photography, you would know that color is highly vulnerable to camera settings. If a professional reviewer modifies settings to enhance contrast or saturation, it’s impossible for ordinary consumers to discern that.
But if someone plays the comparative trick, there is a way to tell. We know that no display can avoid color shift when it is viewed in an acute angle, and it’s where a dishonest reviewer can deceive consumers. He may let his camera and desktop form an acute angle, put a well-reputed phone at the far end, place an advertised phone in the center of the scene, and then shoot a picture showing the false impression that his phone is as good as or even better than the real excellent one.
I’ll still use two Chinese phones to demonstrate the trick. In the first photo, when Axgio Neon N1 was located in a bad place, it looks worse than Cubot X6 (720P display, too). But when my view angle is vertical to the desktop, you can see that the N1 is truer to life.
Again, I appeal that all professional review sites should use macro photos to show display colors, because in such a distance, color shift can be neglected.
Well, as we all know by now, the camera on the Xperia XZ is quite moody. In my experience, its been mediocre at best. The low light photography is super disappointing. Then again, I'm quite an amateur at professional grade photography. The Galaxy S6 Edge never really required me to be.
I have, however, noticed some of you guys are getting tremendous shots on the XZ. What I want to know from you brilliant people is how do I operate this camera to its maximum potential? Superior Auto mode/Manual Mode? What would the optimum resolution be? And if there are any standard manual settings for best results? Touch to focus or focus via half pressing the shutter button(It said somewhere that the laser autofocus might not work when we touch to focus)? Using the system app or using an alternative like the Google Camera?
Help a fellow homie out, please, thanks guys!
magicalsalad said:
Well, as we all know by now, the camera on the Xperia XZ is quite moody. In my experience, its been mediocre at best. The low light photography is super disappointing. Then again, I'm quite an amateur at professional grade photography. The Galaxy S6 Edge never really required me to be.
I have, however, noticed some of you guys are getting tremendous shots on the XZ. What I want to know from you brilliant people is how do I operate this camera to its maximum potential? Superior Auto mode/Manual Mode? What would the optimum resolution be? And if there are any standard manual settings for best results? Touch to focus or focus via half pressing the shutter button(It said somewhere that the laser autofocus might not work when we touch to focus)? Using the system app or using an alternative like the Google Camera?
Help a fellow homie out, please, thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi there. I'm not pro either but here are my findings I hope you can understand the logic of my how I optimise:
Resolution should always be set to 8mp (4:3) for best quality as the XZ super samples the photo.
Auto white balance is pretty good but can occassionally be a bit cold. If the lighting is good, you can actually go into Auto mode and tune the colour temperature more accurately than in manual mode (pretty ridiculous) which only gives stuff like, tungsten/halogen/cloudy/sunny. If it's low light, superior auto is going to put the ISO very high and ruin the photos with noise if you're not careful.
For low light photos, what you're aiming for is the longest possible shutter time and lowest EV exposure. Stupidly again, setting manual shutter time forces the ISO into auto mode which means you have to get used to what settings in what lighting conditions will give you a low automatic exposure.
So in low light you would set perhaps 0.5s/ or 0.25s shutter time, try to keep a negative EV. This only works if your photo is stationary and you have a mount or steady hand. 0.5s without something to rest on is going to be pretty much impossible, 0.25 with something to rest on is easy, 1/8th and 1/16th second you can manage hand held but if your subject is moving, they are likely to blur too. If you're trying to take a photo at low light of moving objects you're mostly out of luck, the XZ simply isn't great at low light. Perhaps use auto shutter time and fix ISO to either 400 or 800 and see if that works for you.
For outdoor conditions with bright backgrounds you may have to resort to HDR mode, but it gets kinda complicated deciding what looks better. I noticed some bright ourdoor shots are too vibrant and HDR looks really unnatural. Also there can be a turquoise shift in the sky, same as in x performance test on Dxomark.
8mp is the best?! Can you explain a bit?
Heinous said:
8mp is the best?! Can you explain a bit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's better as I believe it uses the information from the full 24mp to super sample an improved 8mp picture. Essentially tries to cram in the information from larger resolution into a smaller area.
If you zoom in 1:1 with the 23mp image, you see a lot of noise artifacts, with the 8mp obviously is the same as zooming into the 23mp less so you don't see it as much. 23 mp can certainly contain more detail than 8 mp, however the sharpening artifacts can be more pronounced in a 23mp crop compared with 8mp crop of the same area. 8mp is a bit softer and there is less that appears "wrong". I will try and make some examples later perhaps. (or prove myself wrong...who knows )
Ok took a few photos to try and illustrate why 8mp is better.
I took two photos, one at 8mp and the other at 23mp, both at exactly the same settings, 40 iso.
I then scaled the 23mp to 8mp using image resizing in photoshop then took 100% crops to show part of the picture.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Notice in particular around the black seal on the window frame the extra noise on the 23mp crop. I believe the difference is the point at which the xz applies sharpening. On a 23mp photo, it applies the sharpening right after taking the raw photo.
However, in the case of the 8mp photo, it super samples a 23mp pixel raw (either resize or combines pixel data to produce the 8mp, THEN applies sharpening. So in the 8mp, the image information is taken from 23mp and compressed into 8mp, whereas on 23mp it sharpens first, and after you resize it or look at it on a monitor there sharpening artifacts are much more noticeable.
Here is another example at 400iso , look at the threads and pins and the extra noise and distortion on the 23mp photo.
23mp photos DO contain more detail, BUT only if viewed 100% at which point it looks like crap anyway due to sharpening of a noisy photo.
23mp downsized to 8mp has LESS detail compared to taking the photo in 8mp because of the difference where the sharpening is applied.
So the conclusion: Take photos at 8mp (or even 2mp haha because the same theory applies there) Sharpening should happen last in post processing not before denoise/resize.
I've trying out the camera at 8mp, but I haven't had a chance to really look at the results on a large display to see the difference.
Any other recommendations for getting the best photos out of this camera?
I guess one benefit of using the camera at 8mp is that you should be able take advantage unlimited full-size backups on Google Photos. If you use the 23mp setting, they will either count against your storage limit or be reduced to 16mp...
I am provided this device as courtesy of Honor UK. I am going to express my thoughts and impression on Honor 9A. This is my personal and honest opinion of the device.
Before I jump to photography aspect of the Honor 9A I would like to discuses some other aspect of this device. some of features as follows:
1. 6.3”, 88.4% screen to body ratio full view 20:9 aspect ratio display of LCD panel. ( very computable to watch video contents.)
2. Magic ui 3.1 that is honor skin of android 10 out of the box. (latest operating system, many flagship of previous years are still on the list to upgrade to this)
3. 5000 amh battery (all day long battery) and ‘Ultra Power Saving Mode’ in case the device need to run longer in minimum power (12 hours on 5% battery power)
4. 3.5 mm headphone jack ( now we can use our favourite headphones)
5. FM radio without need of DATA ( Yeah!! Just need to plug in headphone to work as antenna)
6. Super comfortable hold and use, slim design with mate finish sides for strong grip.
7. Biometric and facial lock system along with traditional pin and pattern unlock system.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Camera
Honor 9A comes with triple rear camera and a front selfie camera. Rear cameras are 13MP Main camera along with 5MP ultra wide angle and 2MP depth sensor camera. I will summarise these camera as average in general circumstances. However if you consider the price range of the device it is above average. It is known fact that Honor devices comes with awesome camera performance. This device in particular is not focused on the camera hardware section. Moreover it lacks many popular software features of Honor camera software. This does not mean it has bad camera but it feels weaker in comparison with other Honor Device. I will simply explain good and bad aspect of the camera in my opinion in few important aspect of photography.
General photography
Its simple basic camera very useful for armature mobile photographer. Simple and easy to use. Picture quality is good enough for general use such as social media post or keeping it for memory. Images has good amount of detail and clarity. Pictures are slightly over saturated so it appears vibrant. This is perfect for general users who don’t have much knowledge of post editing.
Portrait
This device is able to capture good portrait pictures. I would not consider this is above average. It has decent amount of background blur on portrait images. I was expecting more than this considering it has 2MP depth sensor lens. However I personally did find much benefit of having that extra lens. So the portrait images are acceptable. Moreover, it does some post processing that improves image quality.
Close up/macro
It is surprisingly good for close up photography. It’s 2MP depth sensor camera rally stands out when it comes to close up photography. There is also PRO mode section where we can manually control, focus, shutter speed, ISO and so on.
Video
Video quality is fine on this device. it is able to capture up to 1080P on 30 FPS. I personally like to take video with 60fps. It might disappoint some users who are not used to with video capturing cause 30fps requires good amount of balance on video capturing. 60 fps would be beneficial in such condition. However, when captured with good balance 1080p with 30fps is considered as good quality.
Light condition
This device takes good picture in good light condition. It may over or under expose on extreme highlight and shadow condition. Meaning if you take picture of a house at sunset it may darken entire house to bring light of sun set.
It has shown weakness in low light condition. Pictures contain some amount of grain at low light. It becomes very difficult to maintain quality in very poor light condition. Such as, darker room with table light. Having said that this is important to consider that this device is introduced as budget device and this level of low light quality need to be accepted as satisfactory.
Wide angle, this device has 5MP wide angle lens. Wide angle is very useful for landscape photography. When comes to landscape photography 5MP resolution is not that helpful. We would lose significant amount of details from image due to lower resolution. when using wide angle for close up images it produces good quality pictures. but majority use of wide angle is to capture more in single frame so higher resolution would surly benefit.
Negative
I have used Honor and Huawei device before so I am aware of some of revolutionary photography features of these devices. When comes to mobile phone photography I consider 3 things is must have Nightmode, portrait and light painting. Honor has decided to ditch these key photography features. Therefore I have come to conclusion that this device is not for serious photography. This might be true as this device is targeted to different demography that may not be much interested on top end photography features. If you are looking for device that is above average on photography than you should look for some other devices such as Honor9x pro, Honor 20 pro.
In summary, honor 9 A has various key features to meet your daily demand. Please read following great review of thee product my member of this community. If you are not into much into photography and just want a simple camera phone with simplified features than this device is for you. It is able to take good quality pictures ( main lens 1x) that does not need editing most of the time. User interface in the camera app is much simplified so it is suitable for entry level consumers.
Source: https://community.hihonor.com/uk/topicdetail/Honor-9a,-my-thoughts-on-Tripple-camera/topicId_23039/
Hello All,
I hope you all are staying positive and doing amazing.
In this thread I am going to share in-depth cool new features of Oppo Reno 7 Pro 5G Smartphone .
So without any delay lets get started.
So I'll be sharing all the key highlights shared by Official Oppo Team here in this thread.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
OPPO Reno7 Pro 5G
(CPH2293)
• Flagship Portrait Camera System
• DSLR-Like Portraits
• Aircraft-Grade Shooting Star Design
• 65W SUPERVOOCTM
• ColorOS 12
Product Description:
Slim and Effective
With a sleek 7.45 mm thin 2.5 D body, weighing around 180 g, this phone is meant to offer you a featherlight experience, making it pleasant to handle this phone for a long period when capturing video or viewing your favourite movie.
Sharp Visuals
With a 16.5 cm (6.4) display and a refresh rate of 90 Hz, this phone has a unique design that will catch people's attention wherever you go, as well as a dynamic video playback that will give you a stutter-free visual experience.
Size and Weight:
Height
15.82 cm
Width
7.32 cm
Thickness
0.75 cm
Weight
About 180 g
Influential Processor
With a comprehensive 6 nm processor, 1+3+4 architecture, and an integrated 5G MediaTek SoC, this phone’s processor delivers lightning-fast performance. Furthermore, this phone has design modifications such as AI Deblur, which reduces blurriness while capturing images, providing an ideal atmosphere for capturing great photos.
Chips:
CPU
MediaTek Dimensity 1200-MAX
CPU Speed Cores
8 cores with a maximum frequency of 3.0 GHz (1 super large core + 3 large cores + 4 small cores)
GPU
ARM G77 MC9
Storage:
RAM and ROM Capacities
12 GB + 256 GB
RAM Type
LPDDR4x @ 2133 MHz, 4 x 16-bit
ROM Specifications
UFS3.1 @ 2 Lanes HS-Gear4
Phone Storage Card
Not supported
USB OTG
Supported (OTG reverse charging supported)
Sharp Visuals
With a 16.5 cm (6.4) display and a refresh rate of 90 Hz, this phone has a unique design that will catch people's attention wherever you go, as well as a dynamic video playback that will give you a stutter-free visual experience.
Display:
Size
Size (screen diagonal): 16.6 cm
Screen Ratio
92.8%
Resolution
FHD (2400 × 1080)
Refresh Rate
Maximum: 90 Hz
Options: 90 Hz or 60 Hz
Touch Sampling Rate
Maximum: 1000 Hz (5 fingers)
Default: 180 Hz (5 fingers)
Colour Gamut
Vivid mode: 97.60% NTSC/99.94% DCI-P3
Gentle mode: 72% NTSC/100% sRGB
Color Depth
16.7 million colors (8-bit)
Pixel Density
402PPI
Brightness
500 nits (typical); with a maximum of 800 nits in sunlight (typical) and a maximum of 920 nits when displaying HDR or HDR10+ contents.
Panel
Soft AMOLED
Cover Glasses
Corning® Gorilla® Glass 5 (GG5)
Camera:
Intelligent Frame Sense
With two Sony camera sensors, one for the front and one for the back cameras, you'll be able to take unrivalled photographs regardless of the illumination. You can flamboyantly record memorable recollections of your life.
Power of Bokeh
With around 25 levels of ergonomic blurring, bokeh, and light spot size, Portrait Mode places your favourite person in focus with flawlessly blurred backgrounds and keeps their cherished smiles in an unending DSLR-style portrait image.
Eloquent Portrait Camera
Owing to the Portrait Camera System powered by AI, this camera detects your surroundings and instantly switches on Ultra Night Video or Live HDR, so you can shoot vibrant movies that are clear and bright.
Expressive Photography
DOL-HDR technology helps minimise overexposure in well-lit regions while preserving details in dimly lit surroundings, allowing you to record the warmest moments of your life with amazing HDR effects.
Scenic Beauty
The front camera image sensor, which is powered by Sony electronics, offers improved light-capturing abilities and photographic capacity. Be it a sunset shot or a full moon shot, every selfie comes alive with great image resolution.
Dapper Sensor
The front camera, which is powered by Quadra Binning Algorithm features an RGBW sensor that is sensitive to huge volumes of light and reduces noise significantly, enabling you to take stunning photos even in low-light situations.
Smart Selfie
When it's just you and the phone, the front camera employs a conventional wide-angle to ensure you're the focus of attention in the selfie. When you're in a group, the phone's front camera detects the number of people in the frame and automatically shifts to a wider angle, ensuring that everyone is in focus and no one is left out.
Rear
Main camera: f/1.8; FOV 86°; 7P lens; AF supported; closed-loop focus motor
Ultra-wide angle camera: f/2.2; FOV 118.9°; 5P lens, FF
Macro camera: f/2.4; FOV 88.8°; 3P lens; FF
Front
Front camera: 32MP (f/2.4); FOV 90°; lens: 5P
Shooting Mode
Rear: Photo, Video, Night, Expert, Panorama, Portrait, Time-lapse, Dual-view video, Slow-motion, Text scanner, Extra HD, Macro, Movie, Sticker, and Google Lens (Supported only for regions outside the Chinese Mainland.), Soloop templates (Not supported for EU regions.)
Front: Photo, Video, Panoramic, Portrait, Night, Time-lapse, Dual-view video, and Sticker
Video
Rear: Up to [email protected] fps, [email protected] fps/30 fps, and [email protected] fps/30 fps
Video slo-mo: [email protected] fps, and [email protected] fps
Video stabilization: EIS, [email protected]/60 fps
Video zoom: [email protected] fps, [email protected] fps/30 fps, [email protected] fps/30 fps
Front: Supports 1080P/[email protected] fps (default: [email protected] fps) (Retouch: turned off for European areas and turned on for other regions by default).
Supports video stabilization at [email protected] fps.
Does not support zoom or slow motion.
Battery:
Blazing-fast Charging
This phone comes with a 65 W SUPER VOOC charger that can charge the 4500 mAh battery to 100% in around 31 minutes.
Battery
2×2200 mAh/17.02 Wh (Rated value)
2×2250 mAh/17.41 Wh (Typical value)
Equivalent to 4500 mAh
Fast Charge
65W SUPERVOOCTM, 50W SUPERVOOCTM, 33W SUPERVOOCTM, VOOC(5V/4A), PD (9V/2A)
Engaging Gameplay
This phone's X-Axis Liner Motor generates varied amounts of vibration feedback, allowing you to indulge in a flawless and immersive gaming experience. This allows you to play games while also enjoying the sensation of each movement on the screen.
Quirky Design
This phone uses LDI (Laser Direct Imaging) processing, which is often used in the semiconductor sector to provide precise touch. Additionally, the design of this phone is inspired by auroras, and features over 1.2 million micro-lines.
Novel Build
This phone, which is powered by LDI technology, is meant to be appealing, making the beholder the focus of attention while providing an opulently delightful feel.
Brilliance Illuminated
This phone uses hot-bent optical fiber technology, and in the form of a 3D Orbit Breathing Light, you can see indistinct starlight hushing around the camera piece. This alerts you of incoming calls, recent messages, and other important information.
All the above images are from web
This all comes with an amazing price of Rs.39999 as per flipkart .
This is all for today's thread. If you find this thread interesting and helpful so please follow, like and comment your reviews.
See you all in the next thread.
Till then, Stay Safe.
Signing off-
Abhishekyadavphotography