Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 2 pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I have tried photography with realme already, I am very interested in part because the color is high accuracy and shooting different types Một vài cảm nhận về Realme 2, 2 Pro và C1 sau một ngày dùng thử
The phone shoots decent pictures in daylight but quite struggles in low light. OS needs the ability to support camera2api so ported gcam ported with night sight could be executed. It might save the camera from being completely sucks in low light situation. Few ported cameras such as HMD, Snapdragon and HTC camera work quite fine with the exception of bokeh feature.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Redmi 3s come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Overall photo quality is great.
I had the xiaomi mi3 earlier and it was stellar in photography , 3 years later the redmi 3s prime cannot match it in terms of sharpness or color reproduction. but it does take decent pictures given lighting is good
Very good for its price range. But better color tuning is needed
Very good for what you pay
Good on stock MIUI camera, but not satisfying on AOSP based roms camera app.
Hopefully, recently MIUI camera has been ported for other roms so you can enjoy quality pictures on custom roms, too.
Photo quality is very nice in gd light condition..
Sent from my Redmi 3S using Tapatalk
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Wileyfox Swift 2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Most pictures are grainy or fuzzy. Even with good lighting and holding the camera still.
In low light the photos are even worse.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Yu Yureka Black come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Well I wish I could give more than 5 stars,... The photo quality is amazing for a 13 mp sensor, u can't find a phone with better camera sensor than yureka black in sub 7K segment
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The quality of the picture is pretty good, but there is no chance that it will allow inside and outside light at the same time with the stock camera app.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 7.2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The pixel binning for the photos taken by the 48MP primary lens is terrible.
You cant zoom into any photo because they're terrible.
The stock camera is very bad, I was trying Google Camera and I satisfied it
Mixed bag...
It does fairly well in good lighting. The depth mapping allows you to refocus while editing in Google Photos, on the device, but not elsewhere. Hopefully other apps with get this ability sometime, too.
Wide angle and Night Sight are disappointing. Looking forward to improvements through software updates.
In the meantime, applied the Gcam port, which works just fine.
dandrake47 said:
The pixel binning for the photos taken by the 48MP primary lens is terrible.
You cant zoom into any photo because they're terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you help me with the instructions for Gcam for Nokia 7.2?
dkghos said:
Can you help me with the instructions for Gcam for Nokia 7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure.
Check out the GCam ports here - https://www.celsoazevedo.com/files/android/google-camera/
Personally, I was using parrot043's and Arnova's ports which worked good for me, but you can test out any of them (GCam 7.2 ports require Android 10 and above) to your liking.
Thanks a lot.
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 7.2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In low light conditions Gcam is better. But tried a few stock camera portrait pics onn different Zeiss modes. Not bad