Database Info

My SoftBank Bill - wrong access point

This is what happens when you think you have the right connection details but you don't:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This was the usage cost for one day.
It is my fault of course but I changed the rom to an English one so I could understand the phone and also not be stuck with outdated Windows 6.0 and other stuff which Softbank won't update.
The phone is an X01T (Toshiba G900). Nice phone but the connection settings are hidden inside the rom from softbank.
I thought I'd typed the correct ones in and hardly used the net for a couple of months just in case. The bills seemed to be ok and I was still paying for unlimited packet usage. I updated again to 20275 and celebrated by treating myself to a couple more apps including Coreplayer. I decided to start using the internet normally again and watch a few vids online (via CorePlayer's built in YouTube client).
They sms'd me on Tuesday. I recieved the bill on Thursday. I must pay on Friday (today). They will Suspend service on Saturday (tomorrow).
I think this was my connection setting mistake.
(I applied for online billing or the ability to check it back in March. (23/3/2008) but heard nothing. I have reapplied since then but nothing happened. Obviously I'll need to visit the store. My Japanese is not very good.) Every month I pay for the White Plan, some other basic plan and Unlimited Packet usage.
The bill was about $520.
That's more than the phone.
Expensive mistake for enjoying my phone for one day.
This is not a whinge. I screwed up. We would love to be able to build an updated English rom based on the original Softbank Japanese one so that it comes complete with default (and therefore correct) internet connection settings. We have enjoyed 19202, 20273 and 20275 (which do have a few bugs) but they obviously need the user to type in the connection access point and login settings etc. Obviously Softbank don't support this or supply login settings.
I've gone back to the original Japanese rom in the meantime.
If anyone thinks they can build a rom which includes the original connection settings - then please let us know. I believe a few of us would be willing to pay. In the meantime - we are trying to learn how to build roms ourselves.
http://myg900.com/index.php?showtopic=1109

Sorry... I fixed the image link.

Does anyone who has SoftBank Unlimited Packet Discount know how I could have incurred this bill?
I'm still waiting for it to show up in detail on my online billing records which I've only just received login details for.
I used to often charge the phone via the PC usb. I've sometimes used the phone apps etc while it was charging from the PC. Was this stupid? Is this risky? Why? Does the phone automatically act as my PC internet connection instead of my regular ADSL or something if plugged in?
Just trying to weigh up all the possibilities. Either using the wrong Accesspoint and login details (with my rom) did this or I used the phone too much when it was attached to the pc.
With reference to the SoftBank page what exactly is `PC Site Browser' and `PC Site Direct'? (I use an X01T which is an X series phone)
I'd appreciate the advice from SoftBank customers with more experience than myself.
Thanks.

Hey dont feel bad i am in the same boat i got the whole SB package unlimited net ect .

9000?? I would not pay it.; nor even 1100! Just say that your phone was strange/acting up/had a virus or something. I doubt softbank would push it, especially considering you are a foreigner.
In fact, I have a mate who has a x01ht and I flashed a 6.1 rom for him, putting in the right all you can access softbank.ne.jp settings, and all was well for a month or two until he did a hard-reset and said "yes" to the autoconfig wizard (which puts in the old settings that do not allow unlimited access). Anyway, he also got 55,000 bill for a few hours use (softbank actually called him when he went over 50,000, I believe). Anyway, he has pleaded ignorance and in the meantime we have flashed it back to the original rom with the correct settings and he has told them he has no idea why the thing suddenly racked up 50,000 yen charges. Will wait for the outcome.....

ChevronLab Tokens

For over a week now I keep reading this on ChevronWP7 Labs:
The sale of tokens has been put on hold until more arrive, thanks for your patience.
Is it just me or is there a recurring problem with the Tokens?
It's alright if InteropUnlock gets fixed, thanks to some very hard work by Heathcliff and others....
But if I can't get ChevronUnlocked because they aren't giving out 'tokens' , well that's just annoying really isn't it?
Any one else having these issues?

Not good communicator
Not only that, but they don't reply to postings in their forum. If anyone posts a question, they might, on rare occasions, get an answer from another poster. I have to say that I am unlocked via token and appreciate that, but as far as being transparent and keeping people up to date, these developers are doing a very poor job. There are requirements to use this service that appear no where on the site other than pointing to the forums or twitter, they do a horrible job of setting expectations and, in general, are not setup to provide customer support.

Looked again today and still no tokens..
Did they close down and not tell me or something?

well better flash a DFT unlocked ROM than to trying to Unlock, its far better, u can install xap files using IE9 within WP7.

maybe they lack of manpower.

I'm also waiting for a week or more, checking several times every day.
So anoying that they are not selling tokens

December 12th?
They tweeted on their web site that more would be available December 12th.

A thought occured to me that MS might be clamping down on the release of these (they have to allow it with Chevron). The intent of these tokens was to allow people to play with app development and NOT allow a method for getting Interop-Unlock.
If MS is following any of the MULTIPLE web postings on how you can IU your phone but need to be Dev or Chevron unlocked first they probably don't care much for that (MS does not want people accessing native code and registry; that is apparent from the lock downs 2nd gen devices have plus the continued clamping down they have done with each new generation).
I wouldn't be surprised if
a) They stop issuing tokens
b) They revoke tokens (and give refunds)
There has been too much publicity on using the Chevron tokens to open up your phone to allow the various Interop-Unlock methods to be used.

LiFePo4 said:
A thought occured to me that MS might be clamping down on the release of these (they have to allow it with Chevron). The intent of these tokens was to allow people to play with app development and NOT allow a method for getting Interop-Unlock.
If MS is following any of the MULTIPLE web postings on how you can IU your phone but need to be Dev or Chevron unlocked first they probably don't care much for that (MS does not want people accessing native code and registry; that is apparent from the lock downs 2nd gen devices have plus the continued clamping down they have done with each new generation).
I wouldn't be surprised if
a) They stop issuing tokens
b) They revoke tokens (and give refunds)
There has been too much publicity on using the Chevron tokens to open up your phone to allow the various Interop-Unlock methods to be used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be surprised if that's why 7740 update come out of no where all of a sudden.

I don't think that MS is putting the kaibash on token sales. You didn't see the tweets?
For all other issues, please email us at [email protected]. The PayPal dispute process is not for tech. support. ^RR
29 Nov
We're working on switching payment gateways prior to re-opening token sales. Possible ETA: December 12. ^RR
29 Nov
Good news, we're switching payment gateways soon. This means those having trouble with PayPal won't have trouble anymore. ^RR
21 Nov
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're like, a three man-team overwhelmed with a tsunami of unlockers who've been waiting for this, and lo-and-behold, there are: a) technical issues they didn't anticipate with different phone models/versions and worse b) clearly real problems with managing payments/purchases and customer service/payment support.
So they were probably naive about how much work it would be to deal with people who have trouble with their unlock. People doing things like: issuing a chargeback to Paypal (who not only reverses $9, by the way, but then hits then with another $10 'dispute fee' no matter the outcome... and eventually does massive fund freezes without explanation or recourse. Anyone who's used PayPal for any but smallest, least-refund-prone business has been there.) If they'd never undertaken something like this before, it wouldn't surprise me that they hadn't anticipated those types of problems beyond the technical.
Assume they're trying to get a merchant account opened.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
whyJoe @ChevronWP7 I'm guessing what's going on is you guys have also discovered how much #PayPalSucks. / @ChrisWalshie @longzheng @paypal 7 minutes ago
in reply to ↑
@WithinRafael @whyJoe @ChevronWP7 @ChrisWalshie @longzheng Yep, and how slow banks are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Chevron token is frozen, tried to contact them no reply, haven't seen any info on what to do, and links?

Blu, maybe Huawei and ZTE privacy "bug"

Firmware (made by Shanghai Adups Technology Co. Ltd) that "calls home" was found installed on chinese phones sold in US:
http://www.kryptowire.com/adups_security_analysis.html

SoNic67 said:
Firmware (made by Shanghai Adups Technology Co. Ltd) that "calls home" was found installed on chinese phones sold in US:
http://www.kryptowire.com/adups_security_analysis.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not just "Chinese" phones, else why are they contacting Google?

Well, at least my phone contacts Google because I have a Google account. I choose to allow that when I input my gmail address. I choose to trust Google with my contact lists and calendar and whatever. I choose when to update the apps or not.
This chinese spyware is embedded in firmware (trusted app, capable of escalation) and on a totally different level of what it can do, you could read it in the article. Or not. The article has even a comparison with a similar spyware from 2011:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

SoNic67 said:
Well, at least my phone contacts Google because I have a Google account. I choose to allow that when I input my gmail address. I choose to trust Google with my contact lists and calendar and whatever. I choose when to update the apps or not.
This chinese spyware is embedded in firmware (trusted app, capable of escalation) and on a totally different level of what it can do, you could read it in the article. Or not. The article has even a comparison with a similar spyware from 2011:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I mean the security company Kryptowire are contacting Google, along with Blu. Does that mean a Google phone is affected or is it just as they have a sales channel? Probably the latter but it does raise a lot of questions about exactly & how much control they have of the manufacturing process across their supply chain. Whether it's the the actual phone or individual chips being programmed. And is there any attempt by companies that make products in places like China to check the phones that actually come off the line for compromises. I doubt it but it seems to be a security risk to me.
Of course we all have to trust someone or some company in some way as most things are not open. I to trust Google with much of my data & security.
(I have read several articles on this, but still not much info, all seem to be a rehash of the press release from Kryptowire)

Google code is not affected. This is part of the specific firmware that manufacturer puts in the phone and it is allowed to even be updated OTA.
Meanwhile if I root my device is considered "unsafe"... But that's the only way to see those files and act to remove them.
As much as I hate Apple, I am more and more tempted. At least they control all the manufacturing chain.

Can I load a custom firmware on my phone to eliminate this?

If you can unlock the bootloader, yes.
At the minimum you need root, to be able to disable/eliminate the software. The original article that I have linked has the details of the software names:
com.adups.fota.sysoper
com.adups.fota

Hi guys,
I knew that by now you have all heard about this news the Chinese budget android devices are secretly sending users’ data to China...
I thought I'll ask amongst the experts anyway how much of a thread could it actually be, as I'm a new P8 user (previously only had Samsung's)
What bothers me is the fact news comes from a private contractor to US govt which aren't really fair & square on the privacy issues in the first place, and apparently the 'feature' was 'accidental' discovered...really?!?
Considering the timing and situation on the market, seems to me to be a competition battle...but it's just my thought
Anyway...Do you think a simple root is enough to get rid of such 'back door' code?
Looking forward to your input
PS. articles available at:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/15/1...-text-messages
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/us...rity.html?_r=0
and original report http://www.kryptowire.com/adups_security_analysis.html

...and not two days later another news emerges... hehe just when some may have thought they are any different
https://interc.pt/2gkn4dz

M4ti said:
Hi guys,
I knew that by now you have all heard about this news the Chinese budget android devices are secretly sending users’ data to China...
I thought I'll ask amongst the experts anyway how much of a thread could it actually be, as I'm a new P8 user (previously only had Samsung's)
What bothers me is the fact news comes from a private contractor to US govt which aren't really fair & square on the privacy issues in the first place, and apparently the 'feature' was 'accidental' discovered...really?!?
Considering the timing and situation on the market, seems to me to be a competition battle...but it's just my thought
Anyway...Do you think a simple root is enough to get rid of such 'back door' code?
Looking forward to your input
PS. articles available at:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/15/1...-text-messages
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/us...rity.html?_r=0
and original report http://www.kryptowire.com/adups_security_analysis.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who cares who finds it, so long as someone does. Rooting and deleting all the relevant files should work, I guess, but possible could cause some other issues, who knows.

Its pretty funny since most of the people reading those articles doesn't really understand it very well....people quickly jump into conclusion and think that Chinese Smartphone device secretly sending private information to China....
If you read the articles very carefully then you will realize that Shanghai Adups Technology Co. Ltd is a company that provide FOTA services, that means and manufacturers that use their services for OTA updates are likely to effected with the spyware not just Chinese Smartphone....their market share is exceeding 70% across over 150 countries and god know how many devices manufacturers & services operator have been using their services for OTA updates...

[TUT] How to bypass FRP (verify your account) on LG V10 running Nougat

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
​
Factory Reset Protection (FRP) is a security method that was designed to make sure someone can't just wipe and factory reset your phone if you've lost it or it was stolen. Starting with Android Lollipop, FRP is "standard" in vanilla Android, and most companies making our phones have implemented it in their own models. It's a good thing — it makes a stolen phone harder to use, which makes it less appealing to thieves, and anything that can protect our data on a phone we've lost is welcome.
The problem is that people are selling or trading or even giving away phones with FRP enabled and this makes things difficult for the next user.
I found myself in this predicament recently having purchased a used LG V10 and, being in a rush, I flashed a factory KDZ on the device. Needless to say, I could do nothing with the phone once I rebooted - I was stuck on the proverbial "Verify your account" prompt.
If you reset a phone with FRP enabled, you have to provide the user name and password for the last Google account that was registered with the device. There are tons of random work-arounds on the Internet, but they tend to get patched almost as soon as they are discovered. You'll pretty much need to know the login details for the last account to use the phone before you can do anything with it if FRP was enabled before you reset it.
A quick XDA search turns up some 13000+ hits pertaining to "frp v10 verify account" and it takes time to try them all. The truth is that most were exploits geared for Android versions prior to Nougat and, even those which claimed to fix the problem for Android 7 no longer worked due to changes LG likely made between the 30B and 30C updates.
To make a long story short I finally found one method that worked. I got the device back and fully functional. Although I have only tried this on the 901H (T-Mobile variant) it may well work on any V10 running LG's version of Nougat (30C). If you try it and it fails or works you should let people know which variant and how you made out.
The solution for the V10 devices is documented in this video.
The ADB command line used is in the comments of the video but for ease of use this is it:
Code:
adb shell content insert --uri co-ntent://settings/secure --bind name:s:user_setup_complete --bind value:s:1
If you have another method that you have tried and know works on this specific device, by all means, do tell.
It is nice to have the device I legitimately bought working again!

Help
My LG V10 is missing the USB port. Is there an alternative way?

Lrrrrr said:
My LG V10 is missing the USB port. Is there an alternative way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your V10 is running the 30C version of Nougat I have not found another working method. With other versions of Android there may be more choices.
Sent from my LG-H901 using XDA Labs

Mine is actually running version 30B

NYLimited said:
Factory Reset Protection (FRP) is a security method that was designed to make sure someone can't just wipe and factory reset your phone if you've lost it or it was stolen. Starting with Android Lollipop, FRP is "standard" in vanilla Android, and most companies making our phones have implemented it in their own models. It's a good thing — it makes a stolen phone harder to use, which makes it less appealing to thieves, and anything that can protect our data on a phone we've lost is welcome.
The problem is that people are selling or trading or even giving away phones with FRP enabled and this makes things difficult for the next user.
I found myself in this predicament recently having purchased a used LG V10 and, being in a rush, I flashed a factory KDZ on the device. Needless to say, I could do nothing with the phone once I rebooted - I was stuck on the proverbial "Verify your account" prompt.
If you reset a phone with FRP enabled, you have to provide the user name and password for the last Google account that was registered with the device. There are tons of random work-arounds on the Internet, but they tend to get patched almost as soon as they are discovered. You'll pretty much need to know the login details for the last account to use the phone before you can do anything with it if FRP was enabled before you reset it.
A quick XDA search turns up some 13000+ hits pertaining to "frp v10 verify account" and it takes time to try them all. The truth is that most were exploits geared for Android versions prior to Nougat and, even those which claimed to fix the problem for Android 7 no longer worked due to changes LG likely made between the 30B and 30C updates.
To make a long story short I finally found one method that worked. I got the device back and fully functional. Although I have only tried this on the 901H (T-Mobile variant) it may well work on any V10 running LG's version of Nougat (30C). If you try it and it fails or works you should let people know which variant and how you made out.
The solution for the V10 devices is documented in this video.
The ADB command line used is in the comments of the video but for ease of use this is it:
If you have another method that you have tried and know works on this specific device, by all means, do tell.
It is nice to have the device I legitimately bought working again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I grp bypassed my verizon lg g7 thinq through an exploit using wifi with a dead sim card. I basically found a way through youtube and google settings and i never once used any kind of downloaded app. Im on 9.0 pie. This was acheived about 15 minutes ago. It took 5 days to get it. But if you get at me tomorrow I will share what I did through step bu step instructions.

GkHammer said:
I grp bypassed my verizon lg g7 thinq through an exploit using wifi with a dead sim card. I basically found a way through youtube and google settings and i never once used any kind of downloaded app. Im on 9.0 pie. This was acheived about 15 minutes ago. It took 5 days to get it. But if you get at me tomorrow I will share what I did through step bu step instructions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tooo bad you wil likely never see this - as im VERY curious as to whats up with a dead sim somehow allowing a frp bypass!!

Question No "mi unlock status" present

Hello, I'm trying to root my Xiaomi Black Shark 4 (SHARK PRS-H0), I unlocked developer options, OEM unlocking and USB debugging, when I try to use miflash unlock tool on pc, it tells me I need to add device in developer options > mi unlock status, but when I go to developer options, an option called "mi unlock status" isn't present at all. So far, digging in XDA threads, I discovered that one of the reasons may be unofficial ROM, but the problem is, there's no official ROM for Black Shark 4 or any Black Shark on Xiaomi website and even if there was, I couldn't flash it since it requires "mi unlock status". I tried different approaches too, sent phone to fastboot with ADB, then used fastboot flashing unlock command, but it returns "FAILED (remote: unknown command)" output, none of the fixes I searched for helped. Tried official ADB, USB drivers, removing screen lock completely, no luck. Then I tried fastboot oem unlock command and it sends me "FAILED (remote: Token Verify Failed, Reboot the device)" output and it reboots my phone into fastboot mode again. Never had such problem, there was always an option out, but now I really don't know what to do. Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.

Update, I downloaded an unofficial Xiaomi hidden settings app from play store, it seems it can detect the "mi unlock status" option, even tho it's not listed in developer options, so I guess it's hidden. Tried to run task from the hidden settings app but it says task cannot be run. Any ideas on how to cheese my way through it?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

im having the exactly same issue i cannot find the Mi unlock status anywhere plz help

I contacted Black Shark support about this, I asked them to help me unhide the "mi unlock status" setting and make it usable, they replied with this:

To which I replied with this:

Basically, it seems a common occurrence that customers find Black Shark support team incompetent and rude. I experienced it myself, as I was hit with "naaah bruh, I don't care" kind of reply from them and after I replied they were obliged to, they never gave answer back. Now I sent mail to Xiaomi support, since they have better name among customers. Everyone says Black Shark support are quoting "arrogant idiots" while Xiaomi support is again quoting "passionate" about helping customers and providing details. I experienced the first one, now I hope Xiaomi support will address this issue as people say they do, because if not, then I'm almost tempted to file a case against them concerning the violation of GNU GPL so that they completely lose access to Linux kernel. Then they can say goodbye to Android and all the bootloader hard locks.

Cyborg Hawk said:
Basically, it seems a common occurrence that customers find Black Shark support team incompetent and rude. I experienced it myself, as I was hit with "naaah bruh, I don't care" kind of reply from them and after I replied they were obliged to, they never gave answer back. Now I sent mail to Xiaomi support, since they have better name among customers. Everyone says Black Shark support are quoting "arrogant idiots" while Xiaomi support is again quoting "passionate" about helping customers and providing details. I experienced the first one, now I hope Xiaomi support will address this issue as people say they do, because if not, then I'm almost tempted to file a case against them concerning the violation of GNU GPL so that they completely lose access to Linux kernel. Then they can say goodbye to Android and all the bootloader hard locks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to participate in filing a case against them as long as wouldn't cost me money. I too am frustrated because I can't unlock my BS4pro because of exact same issue

junnelle said:
I would love to participate in filing a case against them as long as wouldn't cost me money. I too am frustrated because I can't unlock my BS4pro because of exact same issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It actually doesn't cost money. All that needs to be done is to address exactly what's being violated and send mail about it to the Free Software Foundation. I'm exchanging mails back and forth with Xiaomi global support. If they don't help, I'll be forced to move onto addressing FSF concerning this matter

Cyborg Hawk said:
It actually doesn't cost money. All that needs to be done is to address exactly what's being violated and send mail about it to the Free Software Foundation. I'm exchanging mails back and forth with Xiaomi global support. If they don't help, I'll be forced to move onto addressing FSF concerning this matt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
new update?

Cyborg Hawk said:
您好，我正在尝试root我的黑鲨4（SHARK PRS-H0），我已经开发者选项、OEM的小米手机解锁和USB调试，当我尝试在上连接电脑工具的时候，它是我需要的设备在开发者选项>当发现开发者手机解锁时，我会进入手机APP ，一个名为“小米手机”的选项根本不存在。官方ROM，但是是，网站黑鲨4或任何黑鲨的官方ROM，即使有，我也不能避免它的问题，因为它需要小米上没有接触的状态。我也尝试了不同的方法，用亚行将手机到 fastboot，然后使用 fastboot 闪烁解锁命令，但它返回“FAILED（远程：未知）”输出，我搜索所有修复都没有测试过官方的 ADB，USB 驱动程序，完全发送命令屏幕锁定。它，没有。我尝试了fastbootoem解锁命令，它向我“FAILED（远程：身份验证失败，重新启动设备）”输出，再次将我的手机重新启动到fastboot模式。从来没有遇到过这样的，总是有一个，但现在我真的不知道该怎么做。非常感谢任何帮助，感谢先。
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cyborg Hawk said:
黑鲨4 他有这个程序 但我们无法让他打开​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

its useless if they remove the abilities

I completely agree with Cyborg Hawk. It is very un-Linux to block bootloader unlocking. We own our device. They refuse to provide ROMs and kernel sources. It is something that needs to change...
BTW, I have Black Shark 5. I am unable to find anything regarding this phone and I see there is a history with this Black Shark series. Really a shame. The phone could be great if I could root it and adjust the cpu scheduler and other possible tweeks. My phone reboots at random and if rooted I could easily get logs to hunt down the problem.

any solution ?