Related
I found the following(posted below with links) while searching the net for TV-OUT on I9003 and seeing that we also have the Gingerbread Source Code now for our phones, thanks to ronhoover88
I respectfully call and request all the Devs to come forth and please put your heads together and give our community the Tv-Out feature for the Galaxy I9003 and oblige us.
What I found:
== How to Enable TV-Out (Android) ==
Type the following in a terminal that can access Android's Kernel.
echo "0" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/overlay1/enabled
echo "tv" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/overlay1/manager
echo "ntsc" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display1/timings
echo "1" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display1/enabled
Source : www.omappedia.org/wiki/Kernel_TV-Out
MAYBE the link below can offer more help
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TI-Android-GingerBread-2.3.4-DevKit-2.1_PortingGuides
Thank you and hoping to see some development soon
UPDATED 05/09/2011: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1146458 - TV OUT CODE FROM SAMSUNG'S OFFICE SOURCE CODE CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE <- ONLY FOR DEVS
thanks to zoneking
Many people are busy with the USB OTG. Will surely work on this, after that is done..
thanx gaurav for staring topic. But i think enabling tv out would be more difficult.
i agree vishal, it maybe difficult...
but we've got some great heads here at xda who would literally make it look like a walk in the park
so fingers crossed
also the second link in my post is a link to TI-Android-GingerBread-2.3.4-DevKit-2.1 PortingGuides
^^that website may offer some help for the usb otg too, please have a look at it
Working on it right away!
"I urge and call for all the Devs to please put your heads together and give our community the Tv-Out feature for the Galaxy I9003"
Is That easy....??? Could you put in a good manner to put a post with a simple request??
looks like your commanding us to do want u want... Please Re-Phrase your post..
gaurav2912 said:
I found the following(posted below with links) while searching the net for TV-OUT on I9003 and seeing that we also have the Gingerbread Source Code now for our phones, thanks to ronhoover88
I urge and call for all the Devs to please put your heads together and give our community the Tv-Out feature for the Galaxy I9003
What I found:
== How to Enable TV-Out (Android) ==
Type the following in a terminal that can access Android's Kernel.
echo "0" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/overlay1/enabled
echo "tv" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/overlay1/manager
echo "ntsc" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display1/timings
echo "1" > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/display1/enabled
Source : www.omappedia.org/wiki/Kernel_TV-Out
MAYBE the link below can offer more help
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TI-Android-GingerBread-2.3.4-DevKit-2.1_PortingGuides
Thank you and hoping to see some development soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have tried the echo thing but it doesnt work coz we have only overlay0 which is the normal display .. whereas the overlay1 shud b enabled using echo which is not available in our devices..
the best thing which we can try is just using droid X kernel and using its tv out module ..
bajju123 said:
i have tried the echo thing but it doesnt work coz we have only overlay0 which is the normal display .. whereas the overlay1 shud b enabled using echo which is not available in our devices..
the best thing which we can try is just using droid X kernel and using its tv out module ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya...u are going in right direction. I think we should look into galaxy s2 kernal coz it has all those which we want. And.most imp that we have very less developer support. Means we have only few developers who are expert in kernal like skin, amit etc. We cant expect everything from them to mod easily. It needs time to develope everything perfectly. But we should always.request developers.what mods we want because it keeps informing them that what users want from them.
@ bajju
I think u have knowledge related to kernal. Can u please look into usb otg feature??
vishal24387 said:
@ bajju
I think u have knowledge related to kernal. Can u please look into usb otg feature??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have little knowledge abt the kernal .. i need some help
truly speaking if usb otg was possible den it wud have come long back on the galaxy s , even they have similar pbm wid the voltage and kernal..soo the only possibility is to halt the usb otg till we get tv out ..
tv out shud b more easy dan otg .
@vishal i m unable to get the stock droid x roms for gb..
if we can get it den we can directly copy the modules i guess ..
bajju123 said:
@vishal i m unable to get the stock droid x roms for gb..
if we can get it den we can directly copy the modules i guess ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only modules wont work. It is related to kernal which require deep modding. Actually main problem is we dont have correct gb source code. Droid x is similar to our device but its not clone. We can take their kernal for reference only.
I think tv out will be more difficult as it not only requires correct source code support but hardware knowledge also that how signal get transferred to tv & in which format. Comparative to that usb otg is more easy coz we have few examples like experia arc, lg optimus one, nexus one. I know that samsung galaxy s is somewhat similar to our device but why we should depend on their developement??? Look lg optimus one phone which is such a low featured phone comparative to our phone but they have successfully enabled usb otg feature which is even not possible for great galaxy s developers.
The point is that only we need kernal developers with so much passionate about these features. Because if they get attracted to such features then & only then they will work on it to successful it in any way.
vishal24387 said:
Only modules wont work. It is related to kernal which require deep modding. Actually main problem is we dont have correct gb source code. Droid x is similar to our device but its not clone. We can take their kernal for reference only.
I think tv out will be more difficult as it not only requires correct source code support but hardware knowledge also that how signal get transferred to tv & in which format. Comparative to that usb otg is more easy coz we have few examples like experia arc, lg optimus one, nexus one. I know that samsung galaxy s is somewhat similar to our device but why we should depend on their developement??? Look lg optimus one phone which is such a low featured phone comparative to our phone but they have successfully enabled usb otg feature which is even not possible for great galaxy s developers.
The point is that only we need kernal developers with so much passionate about these features. Because if they get attracted to such features then & only then they will work on it to successful it in any way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro, ur English lang hs improved a lot since u joined! XD
bajju123 said:
@vishal i m unable to get the stock droid x roms for gb..
if we can get it den we can directly copy the modules i guess ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope this can help.....
Droid X Source Code I believe: http://sourceforge.net/projects/droidx.motorola/files/
Good luck
ggclanlord said:
Bro, ur English lang hs improved a lot since u joined! XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha ha...thanx for complement.
blaqkarma said:
"I urge and call for all the Devs to please put your heads together and give our community the Tv-Out feature for the Galaxy I9003"
Is That easy....??? Could you put in a good manner to put a post with a simple request??
looks like your commanding us to do want u want... Please Re-Phrase your post..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blaq i'm really sorry to make u feel or anyone else feel for that matter that i may be commanding anyone to do anything.....I have edited my post and i hope that will suffice
Cheers
I agree with ggclanlord.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA Premium App
trip007in said:
I agree with ggclanlord.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey trip really was my english poor in older days???
I am learning about Kernel and trying to put this thing in! I know it will take a lot of time! (IF I DO THIS THING)
bangalorerohan said:
I am learning about Kernel and trying to put this thing in! I know it will take a lot of time! (IF I DO THIS THING)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats great. I think u should try for simple kernal modding. Then u can proceed for tv out.
ᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖᗖ
I just saw a Thread on XDA saying about Cyanogen for Mediatek MTK6577 Chipsets.....So thought it would be helpful for Varun and other kernel developers to make CM9...
The OP of the THREAD is bucefal82
Visit the Original Thread over : HERE
THREAD CONTENT
ᗊᗊᗊᗊᗊᗊᗊᗊ
Hey guys, We are going to try something new for our china phones - cyanogenmod.
But we need some more devs to get everything going.
For now we have:
-Github tree for Lenovo P700i(mediatek 6577, android 4.0.4, kernel 3.0.8)
-Lens_flare - original port author(may work with system folder and configs)
-some kernel source from other devices like liquid gallant
The main problem is getting adb to work that could help a lot on remaining development. For now even zygote not starting, but all partitions seems mounted successfully.
We need more devs (especially that could assemble working kernel for device), working with p700i may lead to following porting for other mtk devices, as sources are nearly the same.
ᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗᗗ
and this, PS: its the same phone as the cynus , there is the JB sources
http://wikogeek.com/
momohal said:
and this, PS: its the same phone as the cynus , there is the JB sources
http://wikogeek.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We got it already but,that isnt good
You got me broda! I was already aware of this but didn't got an idea to post here! Already Working on it!
ROGER THAT
TheDemiGod said:
You got me broda! I was already aware of this but didn't got an idea to post here! Already Working on it!
ROGER THAT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro,You too working on the CM kernel?? Best of Luck.....Thought it would help Others for getting Cm soon :cyclops: :cyclops:
Well that source in the OP is ICS... JB sources are still a mess... Nothing more that a Cyanogen 9 is possible I believe!
People make their own device tree's also! Instead of consuming that Nothing other than CM9 is possible instead help or GTFO! We will make it possible one day I believe!
@varun.chitre15: The Github Organization is ready! I already forked a few repo's! So, Start Working
---------- Post added at 12:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:13 PM ----------
Dark4Droid said:
Bro,You too working on the CM kernel?? Best of Luck.....Thought it would help Others for getting Cm soon :cyclops: :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nopes! I am not making a CM Kernel instead directly building CM9! The Prebuilt Kernel will boot CM9! Though.... @DanceOff was also working to get CM10.1 Booting :cyclops: Now, That he knows about already available CM9 Sources we could get CM9 Booted first then think about fixing bugs etc. Plus, Most of the people are ready to sacrifice 1 sim to get a Working CM on their MTK Device
TheDemiGod said:
People make their own device tree's also! Instead of consuming that Nothing other than CM9 is possible instead help or GTFO! We will make it possible one day I believe!
@varun.chitre15: The Github Organization is ready! I already forked a few repo's! So, Start Working
---------- Post added at 12:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:13 PM ----------
Nopes! I am not making a CM Kernel instead directly building CM9! The Prebuilt Kernel will boot CM9! Though.... @DanceOff was also working to get CM10.1 Booting :cyclops: Now, That he knows about already available CM9 Sources we could get CM9 Booted first then think about fixing bugs etc. Plus, Most of the people are ready to sacrifice 1 sim to get a Working CM on their MTK Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate, hold your horses you don't get to use abusing slangs and expect help from anybody...
If you are interested then dive into what you think is possible and do it, there is no harm in expecting better!
Its time to united whole developers... support and help cyanogen dev., instead of developing so-called ROMs..(everything is same features... so boared)
Skyrazor said:
Mate, hold your horses you don't get to use abusing slangs and expect help from anybody...
If you are interested then dive into what you think is possible and do it, there is no harm in expecting better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude dont spam this thread also. Y u always discourages dev or other people in other thread and u started this **** here too. Can't u be positive. Don't start with ur ego attitude here too. Keep the thread clean.
NO OFFENSE
skdmech94 said:
Dude dont spam this thread also. Y u always discourages dev or other people in other thread and u started this **** here too. Can't u be positive. Don't start with ur ego attitude here too. Keep the thread clean.
NO OFFENSE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None taken!
But I am not the one using slangs GTF***O
Hi Everyone,
CyanogenMOD would be an awesome accomplishment for these devices. Please try to stay on topic and not engage in petty disagreements. It is incredibly easy for a community effort to get derailed or fall apart. Remember, if you see something you don't like or disagree with, you can always ignore it or report it.
Thanks!
@TheDemiGod
yeah I was working on it, but then i abandoned the project because they already have a wonderful rom which i dont need to mention
TheDemiGod said:
Most of the people are ready to sacrifice 1 sim to get a Working CM on their MTK Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Count me in for that sim sacrifice! All the best for ur work :thumbup:
This might help guys:
http://www.modaco.com/topic/355903-devrom81-cyanogenmod-10-android-412/
Ak****banta said:
This might help guys:
http://www.modaco.com/topic/355903-devrom81-cyanogenmod-10-android-412/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FYI: ZTE Blade is not a mediatek device :angry: Don't spam!
DEVS See This: (N00B's Not Allowed)
We can kang libs from Stock ICS Rom We first have to get it booting! Bug fixes will be given importance later :cyclops
yeah. i have used zte blade. it is not a mediatek device. no use of it
Sent from my Micromax A110
DanceOff said:
@TheDemiGod
yeah I was working on it, but then i abandoned the project because they already have a wonderful rom which i dont need to mention
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@DanceOff u can do it !!
u r a true dev unlike other (i don't want to mention name everyone knows !)pls continue ur work !
Respect developers. Dont compare ..
Sent from my Micromax A110
Well I am still working upon this matter in the background. Somehow I messed up my build environment and god knows why, my recovery builds aren't booting as seen on the thread even though my device trees are untouched. Will be starting cleanly once I finish my exams on 16 May.
And regarding CyanogenMod, I have made a pretty good progress here. I have been studying the android ICS sources since they were discovered. Till now I have succeeded to frontport the MTK Gemini support, FEATUREOPTION builder, MTK GPS, MTK Camera HAL to the AOSP 4.2. But all of them are untested because I don't have the device,everyone knows. For this purpose I am going to buy the upcoming Xperia C3, which upon using as a medium for testing I can do this stuff a bit faster which will be beneficial to all MTK devices throughout. I have more than 30 commit patchsets lying on my machine which I will outsource soon.
I will suggest to use AOSP as base for these experiments because its always good to understand the pure upstream code. Once we have done noticable progress here, we can diff and merge them in projects like CM.
Hello guys ,
i've compiled Kernel with GCC 4.8 "newer version, current is 4.6"
but i dont know if its gonna work .. bcuz 4.7 didn't work for our device.
so i need someone to test it, but u should now if its didnt work u wont be able to go in recovery mode..
only download mode, recently i cant test .. im using my phone, so make sure that u can flash stock if it's not working.
DL :
if u test it, and its worked .. test the main features "WiFi, Data, BT ..etc"
Close , it wont work ..
iiD4x said:
Close , it wont work ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thread closed, though next time you post a kernel binary would you also post its source code to comply with both the GNU General Public License v2 and the XDA forum rules - I have removed the download link as we don't allow non-GPL compliant kernels on XDA.
Thanks.
hi i use custom roms on my s4 i9505, i told my friend and he said i was stupid because people can attach harmful code to any rom or program.
that can give a crook access to your pc or phone. he played me a couple of videos showing this because he has been hit on his self using third party apps, and antivirus programs do not see this code..
Can anyone elaborate on this and prove this is not true about custom roms.
Many thanks
fezz64 said:
hi i use custom roms on my s4 i9505, i told my friend and he said i was stupid because people can attach harmful code to any rom or program.
that can give a crook access to your pc or phone. he played me a couple of videos showing this because he has been hit on his self using third party apps, and antivirus programs do not see this code..
Can anyone elaborate on this and prove this is not true about custom roms.
Many thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
custom roms on this site are required to be open source. that means the developer must post the source code to his work or it can not be posted here. for this reason it is highly unlikely you will find any nefarious code in any of the roms posted here. as for roms posted on other sites, i cant speak for their policies.
apps are always subject to malware, thats why you should only download them from a trusted source like the play store or this site.
bweN diorD said:
custom roms on this site are required to be open source. that means the developer must post the source code to his work or it can not be posted here. for this reason it is highly unlikely you will find any nefarious code in any of the roms posted here. as for roms posted on other sites, i cant speak for their policies.
apps are always subject to malware, thats why you should only download them from a trusted source like the play store or this site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi thanks for your help i will continue useing echoe rom as i cannot fault it...
.........THANKS TO ALL..........
stick to one developr
stick to one developer and follow the custom rom threads carefully so that u can understand who is a very good developer
as title. I see this phone very well without you support should ask. Look forward to the developers interested and help. thank you.
Vivo v3 max is dead ... Get a life
Why? I don't understand!
Can anyone please provide custom rom for vivo v3 max i want it too......refering too
Please tell us any method to root vivo v3 max .....please:crying:
rybxda said:
Please tell us any method to root vivo v3 max .....please:crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a Google search for:
"How to root (type your device's model number here)"
Go to system settings>about phone and look around in those settings for your model number then use that model number in your search.
If it doesn't find anything for your device then there is not a known method to root your device.
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
thank you for your reply,
Hmm, thank you for your reply, But i can't find anything useful on google that's why i posted it here , vivo v3 max is decent device has 4GB of ram sd652 wich can support qc 3.0 , gives great performance in pubg , and what not . The thing is someone started developing rom (old post @liamcrayden on xda) but till now it's all radio silence , please if any dev reading this help there are more than 20,000 user's of vivo v3 max who want custom rom till now date
rybxda said:
Hmm, thank you for your reply, But i can't find anything useful on google that's why i posted it here , vivo v3 max is decent device has 4GB of ram sd652 wich can support qc 3.0 , gives great performance in pubg , and what not . The thing is someone started developing rom (old post @liamcrayden on xda) but till now it's all radio silence , please if any dev reading this help there are more than 20,000 user's of vivo v3 max who want custom rom till now date
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If a developer that has the skills to build a ROM actually owned one of your devices or had interest in building a ROM for that device, ROMs would already be built for it.
Since there are not any ROMs for it, that means that no developers own the device, developers only build for devices they own and then share their work with the community. This device is not the kind of device that a real developer would own or be interested in building for, it is not "new" or "cool" enough.
If you want a developer to build a ROM for that device, you have to be willing to buy another device like it and donate it to a developer(if you can find a developer that is willing to build the ROM for you, you have to find them, they will NOT come to you). If you can't or won't donate a device to a developer then you won't be getting your ROM unless you or another user of the device or you and several other users of the device get together and get to work learning how to build a ROM.
Mid-range to low-end devices usually don't get support from developers, some of these devices might get/have ROMs available but that isn't because an actual developer built them, it is because a user of the device or a group of users, that are not developers, takes it upon themselves to build a ROM for the device.
If no developers have built ROMs for it, but you are determined to get a ROM, then you need to get to work learning how to build it for yourself, you stand a better chance of getting a ROM that way instead of waiting for "someone else" to build a ROM for a device that no one is really interested in.
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
pfern_007 said:
Vivo v3 max is dead ... Get a life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't say that it's powerful device needs just customize that's all
Sent from my vivo V3Max using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 12:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:58 AM ----------
Droidriven said:
If a developer that has the skills to build a ROM actually owned one of your devices or had interest in building a ROM for that device, ROMs would already be built for it.
Since there are not any ROMs for it, that means that no developers own the device, developers only build for devices they own and then share their work with the community. This device is not the kind of device that a real developer would own or be interested in building for, it is not "new" or "cool" enough.
If you want a developer to build a ROM for that device, you have to be willing to buy another device like it and donate it to a developer(if you can find a developer that is willing to build the ROM for you, you have to find them, they will NOT come to you). If you can't or won't donate a device to a developer then you won't be getting your ROM unless you or another user of the device or you and several other users of the device get together and get to work learning how to build a ROM.
Mid-range to low-end devices usually don't get support from developers, some of these devices might get/have ROMs available but that isn't because an actual developer built them, it is because a user of the device or a group of users, that are not developers, takes it upon themselves to build a ROM for the device.
If no developers have built ROMs for it, but you are determined to get a ROM, then you need to get to work learning how to build it for yourself, you stand a better chance of getting a ROM that way instead of waiting for "someone else" to build a ROM for a device that no one is really interested in.
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok [emoji26]
Sent from my vivo V3Max using Tapatalk
rybxda said:
Don't say that it's powerful device needs just customize that's all
Sent from my vivo V3Max using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs are not what really matters, it's all about how well the hardware components are made, the mid-low end devices typically do not have good quality parts, regardless of how awesome the specs look or what processor it has. A really good processor on a low rated/cheaply made motherboard isn't much to be excited about.
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk