Database Info

Collin_ph battery tweak V3 RC2 is released!

In case you don't already know, this script is written for CM6 roms, but has been ported to many others. The main purpose is to increase battery life and performance of the phone it's running on.
To install, simply download the file in the link below, copy it to your SD card, reboot into recovery and flash it.
As always, the latest version still can get around 24+ hours of battery life with normal usage under CM6 on a HTC Hero.
I only test this tweak on the Hero CDMA, but it's possible that it works on other phones. I really do expect that this will be the last version of V3 and will become "final" one we've verified that it works on all phones.
New features:
Allows disk scheduler changes for even faster disk access.
CFS Tweak (disabled by default) modified to play nicer with GPS.
Collin_ph Battery Tweak v3 RC2: http://www.primoweb.com/froyo/collin_ph_battery_tweak_v3_rc2.zip
Documentation: http://www.primoweb.com/froyo/battery_tweak_v3.html
Please check the doc page often as I've not yet updated the battery tweak from other versions yet.
Please note, if you're new, there is a lot of features that aren't covered here, such as the ability to configure nearly every tweak within battery tweak, so PLEASE check out the docs. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks!
Thanks to:
Decad3nce for porting rc1 to the eris, and for working with me to develop this release.
Tomatosoup for helping work on the next release which will be called tweaktool.
There's not much there now, but keep your eyes peeled on tweaktool.com -- once that tool is available, it should work on many more phones and be available on the market.
NOTE: Several users have let me know that they are getting marked improved performance by changing the scheduler from "ondemand" to "interactive" through the custom settings. The "ondemand" scheduler is the default in RC2, but will most likely be replaced with the "interactive" scheduler in the final release. You may consider choosing a custom option at this point and changing the scheduler to "interactive". I'd appreciate any input you may have on this subject.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, I'm saving up to take my kids to see the last launch of the space shuttle Discovery on November 1st. If you like and use the tweak, please consider donating using the following link:
Or at least upvote my reddit thread
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/dk53y/garage_sale_to_support_taking_my_kids_to_see_the/

WEWT!!
wewt! you the man

Thanks so much! I'll give this a shot on ZenEXP tonight and let you know how my battery does tomorrow.
So in this update do I still have to run batt-cfg to get everything set up? Also, can I check if it's working the same way? (pidoff bat.sh?)

You don't have to run batt-cfg, it should run as is unless you want to tweak the settings. and the command to check if it is working is pidof batt.sh

Love the battery life I get with you battery tweak. Just installed the rc2, thanks for the awesome work.

Having problems with the link. Anyone else?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

Macanage said:
Having problems with the link. Anyone else?
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just d/l'd.
Thanks for this collin_ph

Says its down for me.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

The Xda "App" on the phone does not show the attached zip that is at the bottom of the forum post.
Probably will have to go to Xda via the browser.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

Jon.StatiK said:
Says its down for me.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says down for me also
OOPS Another d/l link at the bottom of the post

Sorry about the site being down folks, had a problem with the server. It's back up and running, luckily I had attached the file to the thread. Sorry for the inconvenience.

collin_ph said:
Sorry about the site being down folks, had a problem with the server. It's back up and running, luckily I had attached the file to the thread. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bump. 10char

Works great with cm6 stable. Definitely my preference over setcpu or OC widget. Thanks alot.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

So I was looking through the batt.sh code and saw that swapiness was set to 0. Does this imply that paging in/out drains battery?

Is there any typos in this release? lol jk.. but really
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App

Is using this tweak with the #14 uncapped kernel ok? should i delete setcpu, before i flashed this tweak i was getting 4.8 linpack after install it went to 3.9 what am i doing wrong lol

dirkydirk23 said:
Is using this tweak with the #14 uncapped kernel ok? should i delete setcpu, before i flashed this tweak i was getting 4.8 linpack after install it went to 3.9 what am i doing wrong lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure you delete set CPU if you're using this tweak. They don't work well together.

After going over the script code, I noticed that the governor is set to "ondemand". Does that provide better battery life than "interactive"? Also, what is the purpose of the disk tweaks? When they were enabled, my battery life was horrible. Perhaps because I use Darktremor's A2SD?

nspot said:
After going over the script code, I noticed that the governor is set to "ondemand". Does that provide better battery life than "interactive"? Also, what is the purpose of the disk tweaks? When they were enabled, my battery life was horrible. Perhaps because I use Darktremor's A2SD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO, it really depends on your use.
If you use very intensive applications, you'd want your processor to jump to max right away(ondemand). But lets say that you just unlock your screen to send a quick text, interactive would be a lot better.
Interactive, overall, will always have better battery life. The problem is that it sometimes 'sticks' to the min freq before ramping, making garbage collection crap out something fierce.

Decad3nce said:
IMO, it really depends on your use.
If you use very intensive applications, you'd want your processor to jump to max right away(ondemand). But lets say that you just unlock your screen to send a quick text, interactive would be a lot better.
Interactive, overall, will always have better battery life. The problem is that it sometimes 'sticks' to the min freq before ramping, making garbage collection crap out something fierce.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. I can't say I've noticed the slow ramp-up with "interactive" before, but the note about garbage collection makes sense. But going back to my earlier question, I noticed that the disk tweaks simply amounted to mounting certain directories to new locations. Still unclear on how these increase performance/battery life.
As an aside, the dalvik VM heap parameter is equivalent to the JVM heap, correct?

[APP] Sysctl Config (Boost your X10 Performance)

I am not the developer of this app. I am not a developer either, I am just an experienced user and just found an application that maight be usefull for our X10's.
Sysctl Config, It can be downloaded from the market.
With the appropiate settings, this app can improve performance and battery life. What it does is that it modifies certain kernel parameters related to virtual memory management.
This appication is only intended for advanced users and there is very little documentation on which are the best settings. I personally noticed a performance boost and now the phone is a lot more responsive, the scrolling is smother and it boots up a lot faster.
You should also notice a boost in 3d performance, specially runing high end games, such as asphalt 5 and avatar.
Probably the settings I used improved performance at battery life cost, but I will need to wait until tomorrow to tell since my battery is almost drained right now anyway and I just plugged it in. I also noticed an increase of my quadrant benchmark from around 1300 to over 1500.
After testing for about 3 months, these are the settings I found work best for me:
min free kbytes: 32568
dirty ratio: 5
dirty background ratio: 3
vfs cache pressure: 0
Oom allocating task: Enabled
For some, setting vfs cache pressure to 0 is risky. I can confirm that this setting was causing ramdom reboots on heavy usage, however, I enabled compache using spare parts app posted in this link and the issue went away:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=12310102
BTW I am using CM 6.1.1 ROM.

Well, I think such detailed settings is kind of overkill for devices like phones. I'm not sure you could gain much performance, but it worst a try
BTW http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_hierarchy.html here you could have more explained features that this app provides.

creage said:
Well, I think such detailed settings is kind of overkill for devices like phones. I'm not sure you could gain much performance, but it worst a try
BTW http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_hierarchy.html here you could have more explained features that this app provides.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw the app in a forum about the G1. I havr no doubt that my phone is more responsive now, but im not sure how this is affectijg my battery.
What settings would you recommend?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Hey, can anybody post this program download link here? For some reason, i can't download it from market

Farik335 said:
Hey, can anybody post this program download link here? For some reason, i can't download it from market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe you made a typo. type sysctl and it show be the first result.

burshturs said:
maybe you made a typo. type sysctl and it show be the first result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, thank you, i'm so stupid. Let's see what we have there...

This seems really promising. I used the settings posted by the OP and definitely noticed a performance improvement. I too have very little knowledge about the best settings to use for our X10s and would appreciate some insight by someone does I'm tentative to really modify any of the settings out of fear of doing irreversible damage...if that's even possible.
Hopefully as more of us become aware of this application we'll collectively be able to find the optimal settings! Btw, anyone know the default X10 settings for this app??

hm the settings from the op drops the linpack score from 34 to 30mflops.
maybe we should play with these settings.

A thread here ---> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=523707
Some more here ---> http://nenolod.net/how-to-improve-user-performance-on-android-phones/

The X10 probably has a BFS kernel which means *some* sysctl commands would NOT execute on our phones.

rvictorg said:
This seems really promising. I used the settings posted by the OP and definitely noticed a performance improvement. I too have very little knowledge about the best settings to use for our X10s and would appreciate some insight by someone does I'm tentative to really modify any of the settings out of fear of doing irreversible damage...if that's even possible.
Hopefully as more of us become aware of this application we'll collectively be able to find the optimal settings! Btw, anyone know the default X10 settings for this app??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think defaults were 2048, 95, 60, 50 and enabled, respectively.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

setaseti said:
hm the settings from the op drops the linpack score from 34 to 30mflops.
maybe we should play with these settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try linpack twice in a row. Make sure it loaded the ads before trying. Also try quadrant, make sure u run twice when benchmarking since this will allow the OS to kill some background tasks so the second time should be a little higher.
Im getting linpak 34.96 and quadrant 1565.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

javagreen said:
The X10 probably has a BFS kernel which means *some* sysctl commands would NOT execute on our phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect the settings are applied since the values remain the same after rebooting. However i am not sure if this proves anything.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

burshturs said:
I suspect the settings are applied since the values remain the same after rebooting. However i am not sure if this proves anything.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was actually talking about a few settings I found in one of the pages I linked earlier.
I've used the sysctl app myself and using the exact same values as you are. I feel the phone's 3d performance has taken a hit - let me keep it ON for a couple days and see how it progresses.

javagreen said:
I was actually talking about a few settings I found in one of the pages I linked earlier.
I've used the sysctl app myself and using the exact same values as you are. I feel the phone's 3d performance has taken a hit - let me keep it ON for a couple days and see how it progresses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you notice a difference in battery life? I cant say if it has improved or worsen it.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

javagreen said:
I was actually talking about a few settings I found in one of the pages I linked earlier.
I've used the sysctl app myself and using the exact same values as you are. I feel the phone's 3d performance has taken a hit - let me keep it ON for a couple days and see how it progresses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did see other configurations that could be changed (or not). You can find them in /proc/sys/vm, however I am not sure how to edit such files without a gui, I guess maybe a hex editir would open it, but I would need to try it first.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

burshturs said:
Have you notice a difference in battery life? I cant say if it has improved or worsen it.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just enabled it a couple hours ago - it's too early to form an opinion, which is why I said i'm planning to keep the settings for atleast 2 days and see how it goes.
burshturs said:
I did see other configurations that could be changed (or not). You can find them in /proc/sys/vm, however I am not sure how to edit such files without a gui, I guess maybe a hex editir would open it, but I would need to try it first.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming you're rooted, you can use Ghost Commander from the market and use it's inbuilt editor to edit files + save them from within the GUI. Personally, i'd refrain from dabbling with more critical values without full knowledge of what I'm doing.

javagreen said:
I just enabled it a couple hours ago - it's too early to form an opinion, which is why I said i'm planning to keep the settings for atleast 2 days and see how it goes.
Assuming you're rooted, you can use Ghost Commander from the market and use it's inbuilt editor to edit files + save them from within the GUI. Personally, i'd refrain from dabbling with more critical values without full knowledge of what I'm doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
javagreen said:
I just enabled it a couple hours ago - it's too early to form an opinion, which is why I said i'm planning to keep the settings for atleast 2 days and see how it goes.
I totally get you
I dont mind having to reflash, but i did see a couple of values i would like to change. Ill let you guys know what happens
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

^Cheers
Actually, I'm thinking of moving up to Z's 2.2.1 B3 as of now. Should I just go ahead? Just asking 'cause you are running it - is it good enough for everyday use by now?

burshturs said:
Have you notice a difference in battery life? I cant say if it has improved or worsen it.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally my battery life has decreased, by how much is hard to say exactly because I've been a little heavier on my phone today than usual. At this point in the day my battery life is expected to be about 10 more hours and right now it's only reading 4--using the juice plotter app.
The phone does seem to be more responsive though and if I can still get through a whole day of moderately heavy use I'm happy.
Again, hopefully other more knowledgeable people here can post optimal settings for our X10s
*UPDATE* Yeah the settings in the OP definitely kill my battery a lot faster. The phone is more responsive for sure, but at the expense of battery performance. I'm running 2.1 Eternity ROM, dual touch, etc etc if that concerns anybody. I think I'll switch back to the default settings and uninstall this app because my battery life is honestly close to half of what it normally would be, I'm surprised no one else has noticed an impact?? :S

Increasing battery life

Hi guys!
I was looking for ways to increase battery life.
As far as I know you can undervolt and decrese CPU speed
Undervolt does not affect performance but does increase temperature right?
Decrease CPU speed obviously decreases the speed of the phone.
Both these things can be achieved by using a custom kernel right? I heard of franco kernel as being the best for these things...
Any other ways of increasing battery life?
Cheers!

nad4321 said:
Hi guys!
I was looking for ways to increase battery life.
As far as I know you can undervolt and decrese CPU speed
Undervolt does not affect performance but does increase temperature right?
Decrease CPU speed obviously decreases the speed of the phone.
Both these things can be achieved by using a custom kernel right? I heard of franco kernel as being the best for these things...
Any other ways of increasing battery life?
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not try Franco first before starting to tweak. The kernel's default settings are reputedly optimal for that elusive balance between performance and battery life.
Sent from my Nexus 5

PhilipTD said:
Why not try Franco first before starting to tweak. The kernel's default settings are reputedly optimal for that elusive balance between performance and battery life.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah well im using stock now so it was just a matter wether changing to franco would make a difference

nad4321 said:
yeah well im using stock now so it was just a matter wether changing to franco would make a difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, give it a try. Since I installed it, the phone (and my N7, too) has become snappier, and battery life on standby is awesome (like 1-2%/hr). SOT, on the other hand, is still lamentable, even at dim levels. If you do go Franco, I recommend getting the FK updater app on the Play Store.
Sent from my Nexus 5

PhilipTD said:
Yeah, give it a try. Since I installed it, the phone (and my N7, too) has become snappier, and battery life on standby is awesome (like 1-2%/hr). SOT, on the other hand, is still lamentable, even at dim levels. If you do go Franco, I recommend getting the FK updater app on the Play Store.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers! Do you know any good tutorial to unlock bootloader, root and instal custom recovery + kernel? Long process hahaha

nad4321 said:
Cheers! Do you know any good tutorial to unlock bootloader, root and instal custom recovery + kernel? Long process hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a tutorial on this in the forum. I'd link it to you but I am on my tablet at the moment.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

nad4321 said:
Cheers! Do you know any good tutorial to unlock bootloader, root and instal custom recovery + kernel? Long process hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2507905
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2508284
Sent from my Nexus 5

PhilipTD said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2507905
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2508284
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again From your own experience what would you recommend TWRP or CWM

nad4321 said:
Thanks again From your own experience what would you recommend TWRP or CWM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TWRP, without a doubt. It's completely stable, and easy to use. CWM used to be really wonky; that's why I switched.
Sent from my Nexus 5

PhilipTD said:
TWRP, without a doubt. It's completely stable, and easy to use. CWM used to be really wonky; that's why I switched.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess all of these CPU speeds and undervolt can be changed at any time withouth erasing anythign right?

nad4321 said:
Thanks again From your own experience what would you recommend TWRP or CWM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Philz touch. Its cwm based, more features than twrp and cwm put together and more stable than both too.
-----------------------
Sent via tapatalk.
I do NOT reply to support queries over PM. Please keep support queries to the Q&A section, so that others may benefit

nad4321 said:
I guess all of these CPU speeds and undervolt can be changed at any time withouth erasing anythign right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can set up virtually any configuration with Franco. But, again, I suggest you try his default settings first. He put a lot into figuring it out, and his findings likely are the most reliable. I've never felt the need to customize the kernel any differently.
Some people, however, really like to mess around with the settings as a kind of hobby. I used to do so, and it's a lot of fun (and headaches). So, if you want to get into it, go for it. There are numerous apps you can use to tweak all those settings.
Sent from my Nexus 5
---------- Post added at 07:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 AM ----------
rootSU said:
Philz touch. Its cwm based, more features than twrp and cwm put together and more stable than both too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, I've been meaning to check out out. Thanks
Sent from my Nexus 5

PhilipTD said:
You can set up virtually any configuration with Franco. But, again, I suggest you try his default settings first. He put a lot into figuring it out, and his findings likely are the most reliable. I've never felt the need to customize the kernel any differently.
Some people, however, really like to mess around with the settings as a kind of hobby. I used to do so, and it's a lot of fun (and headaches). So, if you want to get into it, go for it. There are numerous apps you can use to tweak all those settings.
Sent from my Nexus 5
---------- Post added at 07:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:01 AM ----------
I know, I've been meaning to check out out. Thanks
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed that by default it has 2 cores working and then uses the other 2 when required... This might sound stupid but did stock already do this?

Try greenify and xposed framework.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.oasisfeng.greenify‎

Im running the catalysm rom + franco kernel undervolted (which by the way decreases the temperature) and under clocked to 1728mhz. I also am using greenify + xposed. Finally I turn off location reporting, touch sounds, always scanning wifi and set location to "battery saving" mode. Without any gaming I get around 5hr of screen on time. Straight gaming gives me around 2.5hr of SOT. Usually I get around 4hr from my regular day. Any other tips for battery?

antutu benchmark score while running AICP

When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks

jlbuck6212 said:
When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trupure with Frankenclark kernel (performance settings) will give you the same results

jlbuck6212 said:
When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom

Google~Android said:
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GEESUS! Do you have to carry a Fire Extinguisher with that?

goolac said:
GEESUS! Do you have to carry a Fire Extinguisher with that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha itnwas a flawed test.. I posted. Pics in acip thread...

Google~Android said:
Haha itnwas a flawed test.. I posted. Pics in acip thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!

iNerdBR said:
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??? what he said ???

iNerdBR said:
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cant share check the acip thread.. Theres a link within the last 8 pages

https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24438995911971491
found

Google~Android said:
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How??! I have Pure nexus and i scored 79k... Do i have to use an earlier version of pure nexus or what?

used to get around 60k on truepure and frankenkernel. now 72k with CM13. how do you get to 78k ? Can Xposed lower scores ?

Running tru pure ROM frankenkernel scored 118,000 thought it was flawed also but still fun lol

Optimusman said:
Running tru pure ROM frankenkernel scored 118,000 thought it was flawed also but still fun lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by flawed really? And could you upload a screenshot or something?

I just ran on a stock odex build that is in the dev forum and I got was 59839. Is that bad?

barakisbrown said:
I just ran on a stock odex build that is in the dev forum and I got was 59839. Is that bad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get around 72000 on stock. What are the individual scores (GPU, CPU, UX, etc..)? Also, if the device is really hot, it could be throttling the CPU.

quakeaz said:
I get around 72000 on stock. What are the individual scores (GPU, CPU, UX, etc..)? Also, if the device is really hot, it could be throttling the CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3D : 22127
UX : 20040
CPU : 13622
RAM : 4050
This is a 16GB version and I do have exposed and systemless root also

barakisbrown said:
3D : 22127
UX : 20040
CPU : 13622
RAM : 4050
This is a 16GB version and I do have exposed and systemless root also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could be throttling, scores look fairly normal, except CPU is quite low. Is the phone very hot when you are testing?
Overall: 73241
3D: 21389
UX: 26110
CPU: 20508
RAM: 5234

It did get warm during it yes.
Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk

akeflo said:
What do you mean by flawed really? And could you upload a screenshot or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots of benchmarks

Optimusman said:
Screenshots of benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy ****! OC Cpu? But i still don't understand how you got that score? I've tried Truepure but i only get 70-80k. I see the UX score is more than twice as high than it usually is. Did you do something to make that score higher or what?
---------- Post added at 09:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------
barakisbrown said:
It did get warm during it yes.
Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to cool it down for a while by not using it at all and then test it again when it's cool, there will be difference.

[Discontinued]AweSome Kernel For Le2 [Snapdragon]

Awesome Kernel For LeEco Le 2
WARNING:
Code:
I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed. Please
do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this Kernel
before flashing it! YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
you point the finger at me for messing up your device, I will laugh at you.
Note:
Only For Oreo Roms!!
SUPPORTED DEVICES:
LeEco Le 2 X520
LeEco Le 2 X526
LeEco Le 2 X52
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS:
- Download Awesome Kernel Latest Build From The Links in Second Post
- Flash the AweSome Kernel zip File from TWRP/RWRP Recovery
- Wipe Cache (Optional)
- Reboot Enjoy
KERNEL SOURCE:
Github
Donate If You Like My Work:-
PayPal
Paytm
Number :- 9022454566
Download Link:-
Click Here To Download
XDA:DevDB Information
AweSome Kernel For Le2 [Snapdragon], Kernel for the LeEco Le 2
Contributors
ProPrk
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: 1.1
Created 2018-04-03
Last Updated 2018-06-25

It'd be` nice for you to include some features of this kernel in your post...
Governors, Voltage control, KCAL suppourt... things like that. But I'll flash It and see for myself.
Edit: Maybe you undervolted it?

Can we use this for AOSP extended OREO ROM?

Tested for an hour.
No heating issue. Absolutely no heat generated by the phone. Would recommend this to all Oreo users.

BMWM5V8 said:
It'd be` nice for you to include some features of this kernel in your post...
Governors, Voltage control, KCAL suppourt... things like that. But I'll flash It and see for myself.
Edit: Maybe you undervolted it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont add those stuff
Me kinda thinking to fix heat first so i did.
In next update u will find cool features
U can also recommended me to Add Some stuff

upendrae2 said:
Can we use this for AOSP extended OREO ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All oreo roms

ProPrk said:
I dont add those stuff
Me kinda thinking to fix heat first so i did.
In next update u will find cool features
U can also recommended me to Add Some stuff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any chance you could add support for KCAL?

ProPrk said:
I dont add those stuff
Me kinda thinking to fix heat first so i did.
In next update u will find cool features
U can also recommended me to Add Some stuff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand. I think some great features would be:
1. Voltage Controls
2. Adreno Idler driver for the GPU (more battery life)
3. Smartmax_eps Governor and dancedance Governor for even more battery life
4. KCAL suppourt for adjusting screen colour
Thanks for taking my suggestions into consideration. Much respect

Pleas add Wireguard VPN. Simple and painless addition. See the Wireguard thread 4 implementation. A couple of extra lines of build code and ur there. I'd appreciate it. TThe fastest VPN and easiest to set up. Thanks....

BMWM5V8 said:
I understand. I think some great features would be:
1. Voltage Controls
2. Adreno Idler driver for the GPU (more battery life)
3. Smartmax_eps Governor and dancedance Governor for even more battery life
4. KCAL suppourt for adjusting screen colour
Thanks for taking my suggestions into consideration. Much respect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add some schedulers too... especially "Zen" scheduler which I personally think gives the best real time performance....
And if you can increase the battery performance and optimisation...

Gray90 said:
Add some schedulers too... especially "Zen" scheduler which I personally think gives the best real time performance....
And if you can increase the battery performance and optimisation...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Back when I was using a galaxy s4, the performance gain from using zen was really noticeable. I haven't noticed that much of a difference these days, since this phone here is a relatively modern device. But, let's see what the dev has in store for us in future updates.

Didn't work for me, my phone still heats up quicker than my toaster. Lol

When surfing the browser of the smartphone is heated.
When watching videos too.
Installed the kernel AweSome.
On stock firmware in these tasks,the smartphone cold.

BMWM5V8 said:
I understand. I think some great features would be:
1. Voltage Controls
2. Adreno Idler driver for the GPU (more battery life)
3. Smartmax_eps Governor and dancedance Governor for even more battery life
4. KCAL suppourt for adjusting screen colour
Thanks for taking my suggestions into consideration. Much respect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done :v
jjo21631 said:
Pleas add Wireguard VPN. Simple and painless addition. See the Wireguard thread 4 implementation. A couple of extra lines of build code and ur there. I'd appreciate it. TThe fastest VPN and easiest to set up. Thanks....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DONE :V
zanishq said:
Didn't work for me, my phone still heats up quicker than my toaster. Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use setting what i used in images

s.l.a.s.h.e.r said:
When surfing the browser of the smartphone is heated.
When watching videos too.
Installed the kernel AweSome.
On stock firmware in these tasks,the smartphone cold.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After flashing kernel use my settings and let it cool down first

BMWM5V8 said:
Back when I was using a galaxy s4, the performance gain from using zen was really noticeable. I haven't noticed that much of a difference these days, since this phone here is a relatively modern device. But, let's see what the dev has in store for us in future updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually found a non-scientific method of actual measuring the performance gains in schedulers.... What I do is download a game called vainglory from play store which is a fairly big game for Android.... So whenever I open up vainglory after the installation, the game starts to extract files... During this I just measure the time taken by the phone to complete it....I found out that ZEN was noticeably faster than CFQ,BFQ and Noop...the worst was DEADLINE...though Deadline gives a better touch response while gaming and decreases the input lag at the cost of multitasking....

Sorry for the noobness, but I don't have the scheduler or the CPU governor you are using.

ProPrk said:
Done :v
DONE :V
Use setting what i used in images
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
oh i wanted to ask you about your FIREHOUND rom for this device. It has the problem where call audio does not go to bluetooth. So I had sent you a log of it in your PM to try and help.
---------- Post added at 06:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:25 AM ----------
Gray90 said:
I actually found a non-scientific method of actual measuring the performance gains in schedulers.... What I do is download a game called vainglory from play store which is a fairly big game for Android.... So whenever I open up vainglory after the installation, the game starts to extract files... During this I just measure the time taken by the phone to complete it....I found out that ZEN was noticeably faster than CFQ,BFQ and Noop...the worst was DEADLINE...though Deadline gives a better touch response while gaming and decreases the input lag at the cost of multitasking....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohhh nice. You've definitely taught me something.

zanishq said:
Sorry for the noobness, but I don't have the scheduler or the CPU governor you are using.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash 1.3 first ._.

BMWM5V8 said:
Thanks
oh i wanted to ask you about your FIREHOUND rom for this device. It has the problem where call audio does not go to bluetooth. So I had sent you a log of it in your PM to try and help.
---------- Post added at 06:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:25 AM ----------
ohhh nice. You've definitely taught me something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Redmi 4x also having this problem not fixed yet
Let see in future may be we got fix