i buy this day a new j7 prime.i installed an application from play store (phone info samsung) and he tell me that my phone is 32 bit not 64???can some one tested this for me??
Well you have your answer. 32-bit
Fiasco said:
Well you have your answer. 32-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what you mean???i know that the j7 prime is 64 bit not 32...why my phone is 32 bit??you have 32 bit like me???
znayver said:
what you mean???i know that the j7 prime is 64 bit not 32...why my phone is 32 bit??you have 32 bit like me???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stand corrected. It is indeed 32-bit.
Fiasco said:
Sorry, I just checked mine and it is 64-bit. So the app must be buggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so you download this app from play store called (samsung info) and you tell you that you have 64 bit???why in mine tell me its just 32 bit...so the app is buggy???please tell me.
I've played around with my J7 Prime some more and I've determined that it is in fact 32-bit architecture.
To make sure I tried flashing the 64-bit version of Xposed Framework, which was rejected with a message that the device was not 64-bit.
I don't know why all the reviews and spec lists online say it's 64-bit, because it isn't. My apologies for misinformation earlier, but i believed as you did, that it was supposed to be 64-bit.
Fiasco said:
I've played around with my J7 Prime some more and I've determined that it is in fact 32-bit architecture.
To make sure I tried flashing the 64-bit version of Xposed Framework, which was rejected with a message that the device was not 64-bit.
I don't know why all the reviews and spec lists online say it's 64-bit, because it isn't. My apologies for misinformation earlier, but i believed as you did, that it was supposed to be 64-bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tnx friend for your help...i installed (antutu benchmark) and i show that the architecture is 64 bit.the kernel is 32 bit...you can try this and tell me the result.
znayver said:
tnx friend for your help...i installed (antutu benchmark) and i show that the architecture is 64 bit.the kernel is 32 bit...you can try this and tell me the result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. This is correct. The kernel is 32-bit.
Fiasco said:
Right. This is correct. The kernel is 32-bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the phone is 64 bit.and the kernel is 32.i think the future update will update the kernel to 64 bit
znayver said:
so the phone is 64 bit.and the kernel is 32.i think the future update will update the kernel to 64 bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so, but I doubt it.
Fiasco said:
I hope so, but I doubt it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think an update solve this let hope this friend
yes....the phone uses 32 bit...but the samsung source code provided for j7 Prime kernel has specified 64 bit configuration while building..thats why my compiled kernels aren't running correctly on this device...
Varun hellboy said:
yes....the phone uses 32 bit...but the samsung source code provided for j7 Prime kernel has specified 64 bit configuration while building..thats why my compiled kernels aren't running correctly on this device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the phone are 64-bit and the kernel is 32-bit??so samsung have to update the kernel to 64???you mean that my friend...the phone is 64 bit????
znayver said:
so the phone are 64-bit and the kernel is 32-bit??so samsung have to update the kernel to 64???you mean that my friend...the phone is 64 bit????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the kernel source they have provided is 64 bit... but when it is compiled i get a fingerprint error but phone boots up...so they are using 64 bit kernel
Varun hellboy said:
the kernel source they have provided is 64 bit... but when it is compiled i get a fingerprint error but phone boots up...so they are using 64 bit kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no my friend.the kernel is 32 bit and the phone is 64 bit.bcz i show this in (antutu benchmark application)..so i think samsung will update the kernel to 64 bit in the next update
znayver said:
no my friend.the kernel is 32 bit and the phone is 64 bit.bcz i show this in (antutu benchmark application)..so i think samsung will update the kernel to 64 bit in the next update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the samsung source code is 64 bit and when compiled it boots up
Varun hellboy said:
but the samsung source code is 64 bit and when compiled it boots up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what application you are using to know that the source code is 64bit???iam using antuntu benchmark my friend..what application are you using?
znayver said:
what application you are using to know that the source code is 64bit???iam using antuntu benchmark my friend..what application are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no app bro...just saw the source code of the kernel
Varun hellboy said:
no app bro...just saw the source code of the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok friend..so you must installe (antutu benchmark) and you will see that the phone prossesor is 64 bit.and the system is 32 bit.try this and show me your resulte
znayver said:
ok friend..so you must installe (antutu benchmark) and you will see that the phone prossesor is 64 bit.and the system is 32 bit.try this and show me your resulte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that i know...the OS is infact 32 bit...but the kernel is 64 bit
Related
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
papasieg said:
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice... does it comes with b.s.o.d too???
papasieg said:
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You expect anybody to believe this? If you mean the desktop version of windows 7 is it even usable with qemu?
the question is: who wants to have it?
as we all know, all applications from vers 6 do NOT run under version 7!
so where is the motivation to have windows phone 7 ???
papasieg said:
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you share with us the same stuff you smoke ???
dont give someone like this attention..
Bullsh*t. If its true, then why no screenshots?
witch1 said:
Bullsh*t. If its true, then why no screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quote
and if is true,
why opened this thread in App and Theme
and not in general or rom dev???
this is a theme or OS??'
he's talking about windows seven
Windows 7 has been compiled for x86, x64 and itanium.
it has not been compiled for ARM and could not be compiled for ARM in its present form.
Additionally, (as far as I know) there is no x86 emulator for ARM that would be able to properly run Windows 7.
Bull****? yep.
Olipro said:
Windows 7 has been compiled for x86, x64 and itanium.
it has not been compiled for ARM and could not be compiled for ARM in its present form.
Additionally, (as far as I know) there is no x86 emulator for ARM that would be able to properly run Windows 7.
Bull****? yep.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for explaination boss
so maybe it's a windows seven theme, or maybe he's drunk
papasieg said:
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for the video and screenshots
Those Dutch guys are all potheads
mmarkk said:
Those Dutch guys are all potheads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
mmarkk said:
Those Dutch guys are all potheads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me!!!!! I do not like generalizations1
papasieg said:
look i will add video soon, and screenshots.
i managed to install windows 7 on my leo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i liked the fact he hasnt said anything since
It should be possible, because there is a ARM port of Qemu and Bochs. Windows 95 is already running on WM (and it runs fast an the hd2).
may be he is 13-14 years old boy who need some attention ... (just a idea!)
header2k said:
It should be possible, because there is a ARM port of Qemu and Bochs. Windows 95 is already running on WM (and it runs fast an the hd2).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. That's Windows 95. Not Windows 7. Read what Olipro said on the first page.
maybe he has replaced the snapdragon with an atom chip. in that case.. me wants toooooooooo
Hello guys,
Can this tablet to be installed with Linux ARM or WindowsXP/7 ARM on it ??
Rotundjere said:
Hello guys,
Can this tablet to be installed with Linux ARM or WindowsXP/7 ARM on it ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can install ubuntu which is pretty close to linux
Sent from my Tab 2
photon4glover said:
You can install ubuntu which is pretty close to linux
Sent from my Tab 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ubuntu is Linux.
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
is Ubuntu installed via emulator/VM (inside Android) or running exclusively at boot ?
Rotundjere said:
is Ubuntu installed via emulator/VM (inside Android) or running exclusively at boot ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Via VM.
If you search you'll find a thread or two about it in these tab2 forums.
too bad, I'm looking for Linux/Ubuntu running exclusively at boot time (without VM)
Rotundjere said:
too bad, I'm looking for Linux/Ubuntu running exclusively at boot time (without VM)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too, that would be so nice. I don't know what i'd need to do to get that working though. The thought of sharing resources between Android and Ubuntu on a tablet doesn't really excite me.
Laserbeak43 said:
Me too, that would be so nice. I don't know what i'd need to do to get that working though. The thought of sharing resources between Android and Ubuntu on a tablet doesn't really excite me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should be VERY soon... I ran it for a while using all the workarounds, but soon these should full be available. Check out the latest from The Verge -- http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/20/4010412/ubuntu-for-tablets-hands-on-video
Phatphool said:
This should be VERY soon... I ran it for a while using all the workarounds, but soon these should full be available. Check out the latest from The Verge -- http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/20/4010412/ubuntu-for-tablets-hands-on-video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very cool! This interests me very much! would be cool to have a nix distro running native on the GT2-7.0!
I have Ubuntu installed on my TF701, and I'd like to attempt to compile android kernels on the device itself. I would think/hope that this would eliminate the need for a cross-compiling setup.
I'm also interested in compiling general linux kernels for use with ubuntu/debian on the device.
Has anyone done this before? Any pitfalls? Any suggested reading?
This should be possible, but it will be much slower than on a PC. Do you really want to wait hours for a compiled kernel?
If you are able to install the Android SDK on a PC, you are about one command line away from cross-compiling a kernel.
_that said:
This should be possible, but it will be much slower than on a PC. Do you really want to wait hours for a compiled kernel?
If you are able to install the Android SDK on a PC, you are about one command line away from cross-compiling a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PC is a lot faster...:good:
@_that
Have you try O3 flag on cortex a9 compiling on your kernel?
LetMeKnow said:
@_that
Have you try O3 flag on cortex a9 compiling on your kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No - the general consensus seems to be that optimizing the kernel for speed is worse than optimizing for size, so I didn't try.
_that said:
No - the general consensus seems to be that optimizing the kernel for speed is worse than optimizing for size, so I didn't try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks...
---------- Post added at 10:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 AM ----------
_that said:
No - the general consensus seems to be that optimizing the kernel for speed is worse than optimizing for size, so I didn't try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you are talking about size, have you looked into the bionic patch? It is supposed to reduce the kernel's binary size quite a bit by removing and optimizing c headers in the source code...
LetMeKnow said:
Since you are talking about size, have you looked into the bionic patch? It is supposed to reduce the kernel's binary size quite a bit by removing and optimizing c headers in the source code...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bionic is Android's C runtime library - what does it have to do with the kernel?
_that said:
Bionic is Android's C runtime library - what does it have to do with the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know much about it and it is the reason that I am asking, haha... All I know is that it will find the unused c headers and compiling the source and create a smaller binary. For some reason, it also speed up your device. Nexus forum is discussing a lot between devs. It is just over my head atm and trying to understand it as much as I can... I may not understand it correctly and thanks for your time with a noob's question like this, haha...:laugh:
LetMeKnow said:
All I know is that it will find the unused c headers and compiling the source and create a smaller binary. For some reason, it also speed up your device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LetMeKnow said:
Nexus forum is discussing a lot between devs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you post links?
_that said:
Why don't you post links?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to but I ran across this topic when I built my toolchain for tegra 3 t33 about 3 wks ago... I brought it up now since we are talking about size of the binary. If I remember correctly, the bionic patch is searching for working c headers and makes a new list before you compiles your source code... So that you are only compiling the usable source and remove the unused one.. The tool is find_your_cheaders.py. I have not used it and want to know if any dev on this forum using it with some experiences with this patch.. I will finish what I am doing and do more research on this topic and will bring you in with links and more information.. Thanks again for your opinions...
_that said:
This should be possible, but it will be much slower than on a PC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not so sure about that--I'm not a gamer-- my "PC" is a single-core Pentium-IV linux box.
_that said:
If you are able to install the Android SDK on a PC, you are about one command line away from cross-compiling a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the other hand, if someone were to post a link to instructions about how to install a Android build toolkit on a Linux box...
Myriachan said:
Someone I've been working with made a full jailbreak based upon this that doesn't require signing anything, like the RT 8.0 jailbreak was able to do. Stay tuned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/tandasat/meow
http://standa-note.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/standa_t
This repo only disable PatchGuard. However we already have the method to disable Code Integrity in Windows 8 RT Jailbreak, only need someone to port it (I think).
The project won't build in VS 2015 Community. VS 2013 Community works though.
LolitaPlus said:
https://github.com/tandasat/meow
http://standa-note.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/standa_t
This repo only disable PatchGuard. However we already have the method to disable Code Integrity in Windows 8 RT Jailbreak, only need someone to port it (I think).
The project won't build in VS 2015 Community. VS 2013 Community works though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's trivia to disable CI using this
hi, with a full jailbreak what will we get from the jailbreak? sorry my friend gave me a surface RT 2 for free and ive heard about jailbreaks for this and i dont know much about it
So now that PatchGuard can be disabled, could be possible to unlock booloader in order to run any other OS maybe from USB?
jesuslg123 said:
So now that PatchGuard can be disabled, could be possible to unlock booloader in order to run any other OS maybe from USB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not more than what we could do with testsigning in that aspect
black_blob said:
Not more than what we could do with testsigning in that aspect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let see what happen from now, with patch guard disabled, I suppose we should have more execution privilege.
Since patch guard hack has been released, there is a guy working on a Linux port
https://twitter.com/never_released/status/704645407041822720
jesuslg123 said:
Let see what happen from now, with patch guard disabled, I suppose we should have more execution privilege.
Since patch guard hack has been released, there is a guy working on a Linux port
https://twitter.com/never_released/status/704645407041822720
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's me
The hack doesn't need disabled PG, it hooks KeBugCheckEx
black_blob said:
It's me
The hack doesn't need disabled PG, it hooks KeBugCheckEx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahha ok, cool!
If I'm not wrong with PatchGuard disabled, we can edit kernel code and OS won't complain about it. So maybe possible to edit kernel in order to enable windows 8.1 features, add drivers...?
Can you tell us more about the port, maybe some one has any idea to collaborate
Thanks!
black_blob said:
It's me
The hack doesn't need disabled PG, it hooks KeBugCheckEx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck dude :good: I don't wanna stay on windows 8.1 RT I would go to Ubuntu or Windows 10 RT (if it came)
spyroz540 said:
good luck dude :good: I don't wanna stay on windows 8.1 RT I would go to Ubuntu or Windows 10 RT (if it came)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get a thread on all the cores, shutdown them via setting IRQL to High level, and when you are sure that all of them are off, start the mailbox handler(disabling the MMU in the process) on secondary CPUs, then jump to the kernel in CPU0 after disabling paging.
black_blob said:
Get a thread on all the cores, shutdown them via setting IRQL to High level, and when you are sure that all of them are off, start the mailbox handler(disabling the MMU in the process) on secondary CPUs, then jump to the kernel in CPU0 after disabling paging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont want to risk my surface rt 2 i will wait for your port but thanks anyway
spyroz540 said:
i dont want to risk my surface rt 2 i will wait for your port but thanks anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only have two first-gen Surface RTs
No Surface 2s here
black_blob said:
I only have two first-gen Surface RTs
No Surface 2s here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what stage are you on for the linux port?
@black_blob hey there hasnt been any update about the linux port have you given up? or you still working on it?
spyroz540 said:
@black_blob hey there hasnt been any update about the linux port have you given up? or you still working on it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The exploit I used for loading unsigned drivers was patched this Tuesday...
black_blob said:
The exploit I used for loading unsigned drivers was patched this Tuesday...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so does that mean we won't get linux for surface rt ?
spyroz540 said:
so does that mean we won't get linux for surface rt ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it means that I have to downgrade, which I never did before
black_blob said:
it means that I have to downgrade, which I never did before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh yeah so you updated to the new version which got that unsigned drivers patched so you are going to downgrade a windows version so you can do unsigned drivers again? and continue linux port?
Hey mate,
I got a Surface RT (1st gen), with dualbooting RT8.0 jailbroken and RT8.1 clean.
black_blob said:
it means that I have to downgrade, which I never did before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For Downgrading you can use a Recovery-Stick, bringing you to RT8.0 without any updates.
Turn off automatic updates, and install the right ones manually.
black_blob said:
Get a thread on all the cores, shutdown them via setting IRQL to High level, and when you are sure that all of them are off, start the mailbox handler(disabling the MMU in the process) on secondary CPUs, then jump to the kernel in CPU0 after disabling paging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you share some more detailed steps for us? I would gladly test anything....
Gratefully
Blade
This sounds really promising. And that settles it, sticking with RT 8.0 for sure now. Best of luck, and I'd be very interested in trying it out!
is there any chance of lineageos 15 or 16 to be made for sm-t285?
if YES.. then whel will we get that?
if NO.. then why not??
No, there was a development of lineage is 15 for t285 but is now abandoned
MR2_Wei said:
No, there was a development of lineage is 15 for t285 but is now abandoned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why abandoned?????
acp Siam said:
Why abandoned?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure, I went to find that post but it isn't there anymore..
MR2_Wei said:
I'm not sure, I went to find that post but it isn't there anymore..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@jedld was working on it. Maybe ask him what is happening with Lineage 15.
I can't say abandoned, more on I didn't have enough time to complete it. I've been busy on other projects lately. I'll probably get back to it soon, though I'll just jump to LIneage 15.1 or 16.0 instead on working on 15.0
jedld said:
I can't say abandoned, more on I didn't have enough time to complete it. I've been busy on other projects lately. I'll probably get back to it soon, though I'll just jump to LIneage 15.1 or 16.0 instead on working on 15.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup sir. your projects are always awesome and cool..??..
Waiting for that rom. sir lineage os 14.1 for sm-t285 was really great. but the CAMERA?.. do we have any fix for that sir? it says "CAN'T CONNECT TO CAMERA" whenever i want to use camera.. can't video chat?.
acp Siam said:
yup sir. your projects are always awesome and cool....
Waiting for that rom. sir lineage os 14.1 for sm-t285 was really great. but the CAMERA.. do we have any fix for that sir? it says "CAN'T CONNECT TO CAMERA" whenever i want to use camera.. can't video chat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using jedld's LineageOS 14.1 rom and have no problems with video chat on Line App. Maybe clear video camera cache is settings|apps.
gcrutchr said:
I am using jedld's LineageOS 14.1 rom and have no problems with video chat on Line App. Maybe clear video camera cache is settings|apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you sir. i'll try cleaning cache..
Sir,
i wanna ask you about something
if i have the same mtk 6580 and the same kernel 3.10.72
can i install a custom rom of other MTK6580 phone
i mean if the phones don't have the same specs but in the same mtk and kernel???
Sir,
i wanna ask you about something
if i have the same mtk 6580 and the same kernel 3.10.72
can i install a custom rom of other MTK6580 phone
i mean if the phones don't have the same specs but in the same mtk and kernel???
acp Siam said:
Thank you sir. i'll try cleaning cache..
Sir,
i wanna ask you about something
if i have the same mtk 6580 and the same kernel 3.10.72
can i install a custom rom of other MTK6580 phone
i mean if the phones don't have the same specs but in the same mtk and kernel???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well...it's not that simple, even though it sounds simple.
You also have to check the chipset, graphics controller and partition layout. If these are the same, then the custom rom would probably work. But, you need to look at the install script to see if it checking for model number. Also, I would look at the build.prop file and see what the dpi setting is. You may have to change it for your phone.
gcrutchr said:
Well...it's not that simple, even though it sounds simple.
You also have to check the chipset, graphics controller and partition layout. If these are the same, then the custom rom would probably work. But, you need to look at the install script to see if it checking for model number. Also, I would look at the build.prop file and see what the dpi setting is. You may have to change it for your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sir i have a mtk-6580 phone.. Model number is Mango Galicia. Sir there is no custom rom available for this phone in any corner of internet. Sir can i request a custom rom from you for this phone??. if you dont mind sir??
acp Siam said:
sir i have a mtk-6580 phone.. Model number is Mango Galicia. Sir there is no custom rom available for this phone in any corner of internet. Sir can i request a custom rom from you for this phone?. if you dont mind sir?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh...I have no idea how to build a custom rom for the mtk-6580....sorry.
gcrutchr said:
Uh...I have no idea how to build a custom rom for the mtk-6580....sorry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sir where can i get help??
acp Siam said:
sir where can i get help?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out the mtk-6580 forums on xda-developers.
Google is your friend.
gcrutchr said:
Check out the mtk-6580 forums on xda-developers.
Google is your friend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sir i wanna ask something. i've an mtk6580 phone which has 6 mb of recovery storage perhaps. I'm not sure. Can i install any twrp of 6 megabytes in my phone? will it work sir?
acp Siam said:
Sir i wanna ask something. i've an mtk6580 phone which has 6 mb of recovery storage perhaps. I'm not sure. Can i install any twrp of 6 megabytes in my phone? will it work sir?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to install the TWRP version for your phone. TWRPs are not universal. They are built for each phone model.
gcrutchr said:
You have to install the TWRP version for your phone. TWRPs are not universal. They are built for each phone model.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sir sir one more help please?.. I can't find the mtk forum in xda. i searched in golgle but still unable to find. Sir can you help me please if you don't mind??
acp Siam said:
Sir sir one more help please.. I can't find the mtk forum in xda. i searched in golgle but still unable to find. Sir can you help me please if you don't mind?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MTK on XDA
gcrutchr said:
MTK on XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanj you so much sir.