Database Info

Inaccurate, inconsistent

How has everyone's experience been with the heart rate monitoring while walking or running? Mine is both inaccurate and inconsistent. I ran 4 miles the other day and had Nike+ running on my GS2 and had my phone with me for the GPS. After the run I checked my heart rate graph on the Nike+ website and for half of the run it was in the 80's while the second half of the run was in the 130's. My heart rate while trail running is usually 160-190 or so. Sometimes it would document my heart rate at 215-220...which is ridiculous.
Also, today I went on a 2 mile walk and activated the walking feature on the S Health app on the G2S. I also had my phone with me so, so the GPS was working. After the walk was finished, it said I walked about 2 miles and showed me the time, but it had not registered any steps for the said walk. It had 800 or so steps on the counter, which is what I had before I started the walk. Also, it had my heart rate down around 80 or so for half of the walk, where it would been around 120 or so...
Anyway, this watch is nice, but it needs software updates or something to get it more accurate.

compared to f1tbit...

Hey everyone
SO I got a s2 classic. I was told that it was Better than having a f1tbit....
I see there are some running apps, nike+, shealth....but is there anythign where you can track ur progress over a couple of days like fitbit?
everyone is saying this is a better "fitness tracking" watch....but I have yet to be shown how?
Thanks in advance...

i have both fitbit charge hr and samsung gear s2. in health tracking, fitbit is the best hands down. cannot really compare them. but i gave up using the fitbit in favor of s2, as i don't really need detailed tracking and screen is way better and informative on s2. s health doesn't offer a web interface or anything like fitbit though.

I used to have a Charge HR and I loved it. Always had the heart rate monitoring and battery still lasts a week. It's step count seems spot on top. This Gear S2, horrible... I will walk down isles at a store and count my steps and compare to the watch, most of the time it doesn't register a single step taken. Other times it only counts half of what I actually did. The heart rate monitor on this thing is a complete joke! It took me 8 times to get it to read my heart rate after a workout and it said I was 75bpm, my heart was still pounding!!
The only benefit this watch has over the fit bit is being able to make calls and reply to texts, which I think the fit it with the GPS can actually do.

simpletona70 said:
I used to have a Charge HR and I loved it. Always had the heart rate monitoring and battery still lasts a week. It's step count seems spot on top. This Gear S2, horrible... I will walk down isles at a store and count my steps and compare to the watch, most of the time it doesn't register a single step taken. Other times it only counts half of what I actually did. The heart rate monitor on this thing is a complete joke! It took me 8 times to get it to read my heart rate after a workout and it said I was 75bpm, my heart was still pounding!!
The only benefit this watch has over the fit bit is being able to make calls and reply to texts, which I think the fit it with the GPS can actually do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may want to exchange the S2. I use both it (Gear S2 Classic) and a Vivofit I picked up a week earlier... and the S2 is vastly more accurate. I can't compare it to the Fitbit but from what I have experienced comparing two fitness trackers, the S2 you have should be functioning far better.
The S2 detects walking when I am on a treadmill, walking outside, just walking around my apartment, and so on. Depending on how I use my hands it will also count "steps" on my elliptical trainer. It tracks my heartbeat very well and when I compare it to the machine's heart rate monitor they match. It also matches the heartrate measured via my Galaxy S4 (I use an app which uses the flash and camera to measure heart rate)

Auto HR (Heart Rate) of the Gear S3 isn't satisfying, I will return the product!

The Auto HR (Heart Rate) of the Gear S3 isn't satisfying, it only takes (measures) 1 time every hour, the Gear S2 did that every 10 minutes! What a huge step back from Samsung, I just hate it! Will send back this item to Amazon, what a shame

Bit of an extreme reason to send it back. Check your settings etc... anyway
Mine records a measurement every ten minutes and stores it in SHealth.

Lakota said:
Bit of an extreme reason to send it back. Check your settings etc... anyway
Mine records a measurement every ten minutes and stores it in SHealth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't have the possibility to change how often we want to measure! We only have the option Auto HR on or off, this is ridiculous! Mine only measures every hour :/

Mine measures every 10 mins pretty reliably. I know I've seen the setting for this somewhere but I honestly can't find it now, I'm sure someone else can tell you where it is.

memo357 said:
We don't have the possibility to change how often we want to measure! We only have the option Auto HR on or off, this is ridiculous! Mine only measures every hour :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine does every 10 minutes too. But it's not a heart monitoring watch. It's an added feature on a watch with a million other features. "Ridiculous" that it does not have specific adjustment details that a relatively small fraction of the customer base probably needs? I agree that's probably a bit harsh!
If THAT is the one feature that is a deal breaker for you, yeah, you chose the wrong watch. The accuracy on any watch HR monitor is questionable anyway. And you can do it manually whenever you want. How much data do you need?
Return your gear and get a fitness-specific device! Start here... http://www.wareable.com/fitness-trackers/best-heart-rate-monitor-and-watches
Sounds like you need a chest strap.

Has anyone found where I can change the intervall to 10mins? Generally once every hour is fine IMO, but there are certain scenarios where I'd like to monitor my heart rate more closely.

It's 10 mins by default. The problem is you are moving when it try's to take a measurement and fails. To demonstrate this try and take 2 manual readings - one perfectly still and the second time keep moving your fingers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

memo357 said:
The Auto HR (Heart Rate) of the Gear S3 isn't satisfying, it only takes (measures) 1 time every hour, the Gear S2 did that every 10 minutes! What a huge step back from Samsung, I just hate it! Will send back this item to Amazon, what a shame
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
K bye. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

I know exactly how you feel. That's why when I work out I switch out my gear s3 with my gear fit2 or fitbit2 blaze. The blaze can accurately measure while in motion, the Gear fit2 lacks accurately getting a bpm while in motion.
The blaze fitbit also severely lacks instant notifications. Pretty ineffective if that's what you want it for. Stick with the fit2 or gear s3 as their on target when it comes to notifications being accurately relayed to the wearable

It seems pretty accurate when I'm at rest but I'm not sure about its readings while I'm walking or hiking. Maybe I should tighten up the band when my arms are swinging.

The latest S3 and Samsung Health updates has fixed the accuracy.
I used Polar M400 with chest sensor before S3 and when I started with S3 it seemed to be underrating, for the same 45 minutes cross trainer session, Polar counted about 400 calories and S3/Health - about 300. S3 also shown about 5 bpm less constantly.
With the latest update things seem to be fixed, S3 indications are quite close to Polar.
I'm doing the same session 2-3 times per week, so I can compare the data.

MichaelGG said:
I used Polar M400 with chest sensor before S3 and when I started with S3 it seemed to be underrating, for the same 45 minutes cross trainer session, Polar counted about 400 calories and S3/Health - about 300. S3 also shown about 5 bpm less constantly.
With the latest update things seem to be fixed, S3 indications are quite close to Polar.
I'm doing the same session 2-3 times per week, so I can compare the data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a garmin vivoactive hr before and the HR seems to be the same while running but the calorie count is really low on s3. 1000 vs 300

Those of you having issues with movement - slide the watch further up your wrist. Every HR monitor ive tried has the same issue. If it is too close to your hand, it will give crap readings. Apple Watch 2 has the same issue and I have to run with it about an inch higher than where I normally wear it.

I had the Gear S3 about a month after it came out and the heart rate accuracy was pathetic. I was coming from Fitbit Charge HR and that one had problems and still was better than the Gear. For example on a treadmill I was running and my Gear could not get above 80 bpm when I know from manually taking my bpm it was around 160 at least. I think it's from the sensor being on a completely flat surface so it's hard to stay accurate during movement.
I now have the Garmin Vivoactive HR and it is worlds better. Stays within 2-3 bpm of what a chest strap would read.

I think just about any wearable has accuracy issues here and there, but in general you can and do get a fairly good representation over time. If you're looking for dead nuts accuracy, no wearable is going to deliver. I've worn my chest monitor with my Fitbit Charge2 and Gear s3, and overall through the course of a workout, my readings are close enough to produce physical results.
I wear my Charge2 on one arm and gear on the other. The Charge is touted as a fitness tracker and my gear s3 SMARTWATCH produces results that are pretty dang close. Close enough anyway.
I find I get better hr readings lower on my wrist. YMMV.

If no one has found out yet. Maybe different in S3, but in my S2, it is located in SHealth app of gear (not phone). The far right card is settings and inside there is a menu called "Auto HR" which is selectable between Frequent, Moderate or Off.

Gear s3 GPS issues

I hope someone can shed some light on the below.
I use the Gear S3 Gps and s health app to track my runs however i am realising that the GPS is not at all accurate. I ran a 21 km half marathon the other day and the Gear S3 said that i had run 26 km. I understand maune being out a couple of hundred meters but 5 km seems to much. Any nody experienced the same issues and is there a fix. My wife has a series 3 iwatch and she ran the same distance and it measures within 20m of the race length

Question Treadmill Mode Understating Calories Burned

Hi All,
I picked up the Galaxy Watch 4 44mm BT on Tuesday, after using a Watch Active2 40mm for roughly 6 months. I made the switch because I noticed that the HR sensor on the Active2 was very inconsistent and got super frustrating when exercising.
Anyways, the Active2 used to report around 300-350kcal burned for 30min incline walks (4.5kmph, 15% incline) whereas now the Watch 4 is reporting half of that. It seems as if the Watch is only using speed data to calculate calories burned whereas the Active2 definitely factored in the HR.
Any else experience a similar issue with the treadmill mode? I am still to test the "Other Workout" option to see if the calories burned are more accurate.
Have attached pics for reference, first is Active2 and second is Watch 4.
TIA