Database Info

Hexgore's Stock plus rom vs. Cynogenmod 9 vs. Cynogenmod 10

I did a quadrant benchmark on all of the roms listed above. Here are the results: (all of them had the same applications installed)
Hexgore's stock plus rom
CyanogenMod 9
CyanogenMod 10
​

archacha said:
I did a quadrant benchmark on all of the roms listed above. Here are the results: (all of them had the same applications installed)
Hexgore's stock plus rom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CynogenMod 9
CynogenMod 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any results check your links...How about CM 7 now?

9v9 said:
I don't see any results check your links...How about CM 7 now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what happened with the results. they were visible when I made the post. I only had CM7 on my chacha for 4 hours, and I didn't made a benchmark... But I wouldn't recommend CM7 to anyone, because CM9 and 10 are a lot better.

I knew CM9 is the best!

any bugs?
furkandeger said:
I knew CM9 is the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey man, did u try the CM9 ?
what about battery ? does it drain fast ?
im curious about it

mohawahba said:
hey man, did u try the CM9 ?
what about battery ? does it drain fast ?
im curious about it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything is almost perfect in CM9 except for the front cam, camcorder and LQ/HQ Youtube/browser videos(Everything video related is broken, actually).

I prefer cm 10 by ajeevlal

Nice thanks. Which rom are you using?

The only thing i loved in CM10.1 is onscreen keyboard , i installed perfect keyboard pro , customised it fully ... is there any way we can do this in stock or other Roms ?

I9500 Benchmarks with 4.4.2 Kit Kat. (Custom Build,prop Share)

So this are my benchmark test on the new kit kat build for out i9500 .. If you have a 9500 or 9505 post ur benchmark screenshots and tell us what did u do to make it higger!. I hitted 27k on antutu on stock fresh install (with titanium backup restored, 4gb of internal storage free)
Antutu, GeekBench 2, GeekBench3 and Quadrant Pro
Then i made tweaking (with stock kernel) and i got 1k higger.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here is my build prop (located at system/build.prop) if you want to see the tweaks i made
MyBuildProp

Haven't tried any other benchmark other than AnTuTu on my I9500. I got 28866.
No mods, no root, I simply cleared RAM, went into AnTuTu and ran it a few times, it sat around the 28800 range and 28866 was my highest. I installed 4.4.2 on top of the Indian 4.3 MK9 fw I had previously, haven't done a format yet.
My I9500 is a 32gb model, and has 18.08GB free memory, I've also got a 32GB MicroSDHC class 10 in it with around 16.03GB free memory.

POLO_i780 said:
Haven't tried any other benchmark other than AnTuTu on my I9500. I got 28866.
No mods, no root, I simply cleared RAM, went into AnTuTu and ran it a few times, it sat around the 28800 range and 28866 was my highest. I installed 4.4.2 on top of the Indian 4.3 MK9 fw I had previously, haven't done a format yet.
My I9500 is a 32gb model, and has 18.08GB free memory, I've also got a 32GB MicroSDHC class 10 in it with around 16.03GB free memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm mine is 16gb iwith 8.8gb usable and 2gb free .. got a 32gigs class10 samsung card.. and full of tweaks.. why don't you try to tweak your phone and maybe it goes higger?

Mod Edit
S4 benchmark thread is HERE
Thread closed
malybru
Forum Moderator

Antutu v2.7.3 - Froyo to KitKat

Benchmarking the Optimus 3D (p920/p925/su760)​
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I got bored and usually dont care much about "benchmarks".
Every flash was without any additonal apps. Just antutu. 1 cycle.
PACMAN ROM was milestone 1 (17/06/2014)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2164367
KitKat ROM was nameless (21/06/14)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2772543​
While PACMAN ROM could be compared to less-lag variant of the ICS Stock ROM, with many, many(!) options,
the nameless KitKat ROM is nearly lag free and very fast ! (apps, gaming, taking photos etc.)
Hence I cant explain the huge difference between Gingerbread and KitKat. (except that kitakt ROM is an early test version)
Also keep in mind that Antutu v2.3.7 is from 2012 and the Optimus 3D is from 2011.

You have too much freetime
I tryed it with latest antutu an got 9246 points With nameless.
I upload later new version. Think i fixed the wheel of death.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA Free mobile app

troopii said:
You have too much freetime
I tryed it with latest antutu an got 9246 points With nameless.
I upload later new version. Think i fixed the wheel of death.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
p.s.
I did not try newest Antutu for a reason...and now Im not in the mood to do it all again. :crying:
Do you have a "high speed" ext. SD-CARD in your p920 btw. ? Size ?
WIll flash newest ROM now
New ROM result on Antutu v2.7.3 : 4666 (4397)
on Antutu v4.5 : 9578
Antutu v4.5 even claims "CPU: Poor, Can not run large apps smoothly" -> While I was playing 8mm and/or Nova (big shooter games) without problems on GB & ICS.
Antutu ran without the follwoing settings on the new ROM (1.7.14)
kernel.panic 0
kernel.panic_on_oom 0
vm.oom_dump_tasks 0
vm.panic_on_oom 0
vm.swappines 10
vm.vfs_cache_pressure 10
lower the dalvik heap cache to 64 or less, 128mb are to much

Nand degradation - post your results!

Hi, sorry for my english but i need help.
Can you please report your androbench results??
My MotoG isn't looking in good shape these days..so i looked in anand's initial review of the moto g and..surprise!
my scores are way lower than the ones in the review.
Procedure:
1) install androbench
2) reboot your phone
3) airplane mode on
4) test "micro" with default settings!

I have US Amazon version, XT1032 16G Sandisk.
S. Read - 78,57
S. W - 17,85

can someone post his results? only me w/ these low write speads? ty

Are you using GPE or something else? Stock is the one that uses F2FS that provides blazing fast performance (as seen in benchmarks) in comparison to all the other roms (GPE mostly, I suppose custom roms too, correct me if I'm wrong) that use ext4.
Apart from that, kitkat does TRIM on the NAND so its performance shouldn't drop too much with use and time.
edit: ran the benchmark as you requested, everything seems fine here. 16GB version, stock 4.4.4 + aerokernel, latest version

My device is a stock 01/2014 16gb moto g.
Is a degradation like that normal for you guys? I have 3.7 GB free!

My results with stock rom 4.4.4 and decepticon kernel :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
There's a huge difference in readings...

Gpe converted xt1033 running Liquidsmooth with xpe 15

mmm
it seems i have very low write speeds. do you think i could fix something resetting my device?

pappalard0 said:
mmm
it seems i have very low write speeds. do you think i could fix something resetting my device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
up! am i the only one in this situation?? i wish i could wipe the device only at the release of android l !

pappalard0 said:
up! am i the only one in this situation?? i wish i could wipe the device only at the release of android l !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did anybody read this article ? http://andrux-and-me.blogspot.fr/2014/06/various-conditions-and-io-performance.html
Simply shows how I/O are instable if any single condition is modified, so, are you absolutely sure that NO condition has been changed ?

in antutu 5 i get near 400pts in the two storage benchs. i remember scoring something like 800/600..huston, we have a problem.
or is it normal and i only have to factory reset my phone?

Suggested ROM for moto g4 plus (OCT OS based on CM 14.1)

hii guys
this is my first post on xda forum
lets move to the topic
this rom is OCT OS ROM . i used for long time and still using
ADVANTAGES OF THIS ROM -
1 MOST IMPORTANT IS THAT BATTERY LIFE IS ALMOST DOUBLED . screen shot of my one day modarate usage.
2. performance is good as stock rom .
3.more customization of UI
4 .many more
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GO TO THIS PAGE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ÷
http://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/development/rom-teamoctos-t3475929
NOTICE -
1 .FOLLOW DEVELOPER'S INSTRUCTIONS STRICTLY TO AVOID ANY BUGS . I HAVE FOLLOWED AND EVERYTHING IS FINE WITH ME .
2.THIS WILL REMOVE ROOT IN SOME CASE( AS IN MINE ) .DONT WORRY JUST ROOT IT AS FOR STOCK ROM. GO TO TWRP RECOVERY AND FLASH THIS ZIP FILE
for full guide :
http://www.stechguide.com/root-moto-g4-plus-on-android-nougat-and-install-twrp-recovery/
after flashing super SU . zip , install
phh 's superuser from playstore and you are done
3 Before flashing oct os rom update your stock marshmallow to nougat . important to avoid bugs???
thats all about .
Thanks toTEAM OCT and other
please subscribe and like this
Sent from my Moto G4 Plus using Tapatalk

Did you tried other roms? Can you please include sot? As official cm14.1 is better with moderate usage compared to your Screenshot. I'm on 4h sot now:

as compared to customization options , i think it should be better then CM 14 offical
Sent from my Moto G4 Plus using Tapatalk

and performance should be also good .
gor this you have to try it [emoji3] [emoji3] [emoji2]
Sent from my Moto G4 Plus using Tapatalk

so i tried official CM14.1 on my g4 plus .
i noticed that the performance was far better in OCT os as the ram management was better .
no bugs was there on Oct os while chop chop flashlight not working in official one
and i think battery life was also batter
Sent from my Moto G4 Plus using Tapatalk