Benchmarking the Optimus 3D (p920/p925/su760)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I got bored and usually dont care much about "benchmarks".
Every flash was without any additonal apps. Just antutu. 1 cycle.
PACMAN ROM was milestone 1 (17/06/2014)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2164367
KitKat ROM was nameless (21/06/14)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2772543
While PACMAN ROM could be compared to less-lag variant of the ICS Stock ROM, with many, many(!) options,
the nameless KitKat ROM is nearly lag free and very fast ! (apps, gaming, taking photos etc.)
Hence I cant explain the huge difference between Gingerbread and KitKat. (except that kitakt ROM is an early test version)
Also keep in mind that Antutu v2.3.7 is from 2012 and the Optimus 3D is from 2011.
You have too much freetime
I tryed it with latest antutu an got 9246 points With nameless.
I upload later new version. Think i fixed the wheel of death.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA Free mobile app
troopii said:
You have too much freetime
I tryed it with latest antutu an got 9246 points With nameless.
I upload later new version. Think i fixed the wheel of death.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
p.s.
I did not try newest Antutu for a reason...and now Im not in the mood to do it all again. :crying:
Do you have a "high speed" ext. SD-CARD in your p920 btw. ? Size ?
WIll flash newest ROM now
New ROM result on Antutu v2.7.3 : 4666 (4397)
on Antutu v4.5 : 9578
Antutu v4.5 even claims "CPU: Poor, Can not run large apps smoothly" -> While I was playing 8mm and/or Nova (big shooter games) without problems on GB & ICS.
Antutu ran without the follwoing settings on the new ROM (1.7.14)
kernel.panic 0
kernel.panic_on_oom 0
vm.oom_dump_tasks 0
vm.panic_on_oom 0
vm.swappines 10
vm.vfs_cache_pressure 10
lower the dalvik heap cache to 64 or less, 128mb are to much
Related
Graphic Enhancements Toggle
Hey,
I'm sharing a little app here - I made this for my own enjoyment, but I decided to share it since it is worth it
Its based on great 7oh's code - Please thank him too :highfive:
Warning: Please take a backup before using this app!
Description:
This app is going to improve your displaying-quality of 3D Elements, Gaming Clearness & more. (Dithering)
You can enable or disable it - It acts like a quicktoggle.
Screenshots
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cheers,
Jan :angel:
Changelog:
Code:
1.0
- Initial Release
Is this same as what 'surface dithering' option in cm does. Also does it have any impact on performance
nikufellow said:
Is this same as what 'surface dithering' option in cm does. Also does it have any impact on performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is the same, and it has a little impact on performance.
Higher quality of elements = less performane
Its mainly made for Stock ROM Users, I wanted to keep it universal (just adding it to settings would make it complicated).
bl
jader13254 said:
Changelog:
Code:
1.0
- Initial Release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
galaxy s ii stock ls8 odexed getted bootloop
Screenshot is broken.
got bootloop with my RAZR with JB too.. had to flash back the system partition. Not recommended for the mean time.
hansip87 said:
got bootloop with my RAZR with JB too.. had to flash back the system partition. Not recommended for the mean time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh..
Can you give me a log what happens when pressing a button?
I tested it on my phone and it works since weeks... Strange
I have no log, but it was ok after pressing the button. It's only after reboot that problem arises. Lucky me i brought my rom package all along.
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
I did a quadrant benchmark on all of the roms listed above. Here are the results: (all of them had the same applications installed)
Hexgore's stock plus rom
CyanogenMod 9
CyanogenMod 10
archacha said:
I did a quadrant benchmark on all of the roms listed above. Here are the results: (all of them had the same applications installed)
Hexgore's stock plus rom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CynogenMod 9
CynogenMod 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any results check your links...How about CM 7 now?
9v9 said:
I don't see any results check your links...How about CM 7 now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what happened with the results. they were visible when I made the post. I only had CM7 on my chacha for 4 hours, and I didn't made a benchmark... But I wouldn't recommend CM7 to anyone, because CM9 and 10 are a lot better.
I knew CM9 is the best!
any bugs?
furkandeger said:
I knew CM9 is the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey man, did u try the CM9 ?
what about battery ? does it drain fast ?
im curious about it
mohawahba said:
hey man, did u try the CM9 ?
what about battery ? does it drain fast ?
im curious about it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything is almost perfect in CM9 except for the front cam, camcorder and LQ/HQ Youtube/browser videos(Everything video related is broken, actually).
I prefer cm 10 by ajeevlal
Nice thanks. Which rom are you using?
The only thing i loved in CM10.1 is onscreen keyboard , i installed perfect keyboard pro , customised it fully ... is there any way we can do this in stock or other Roms ?
So this are my benchmark test on the new kit kat build for out i9500 .. If you have a 9500 or 9505 post ur benchmark screenshots and tell us what did u do to make it higger!. I hitted 27k on antutu on stock fresh install (with titanium backup restored, 4gb of internal storage free)
Antutu, GeekBench 2, GeekBench3 and Quadrant Pro
Then i made tweaking (with stock kernel) and i got 1k higger.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here is my build prop (located at system/build.prop) if you want to see the tweaks i made
MyBuildProp
Haven't tried any other benchmark other than AnTuTu on my I9500. I got 28866.
No mods, no root, I simply cleared RAM, went into AnTuTu and ran it a few times, it sat around the 28800 range and 28866 was my highest. I installed 4.4.2 on top of the Indian 4.3 MK9 fw I had previously, haven't done a format yet.
My I9500 is a 32gb model, and has 18.08GB free memory, I've also got a 32GB MicroSDHC class 10 in it with around 16.03GB free memory.
POLO_i780 said:
Haven't tried any other benchmark other than AnTuTu on my I9500. I got 28866.
No mods, no root, I simply cleared RAM, went into AnTuTu and ran it a few times, it sat around the 28800 range and 28866 was my highest. I installed 4.4.2 on top of the Indian 4.3 MK9 fw I had previously, haven't done a format yet.
My I9500 is a 32gb model, and has 18.08GB free memory, I've also got a 32GB MicroSDHC class 10 in it with around 16.03GB free memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm mine is 16gb iwith 8.8gb usable and 2gb free .. got a 32gigs class10 samsung card.. and full of tweaks.. why don't you try to tweak your phone and maybe it goes higger?
Mod Edit
S4 benchmark thread is HERE
Thread closed
malybru
Forum Moderator
Hi, sorry for my english but i need help.
Can you please report your androbench results??
My MotoG isn't looking in good shape these days..so i looked in anand's initial review of the moto g and..surprise!
my scores are way lower than the ones in the review.
Procedure:
1) install androbench
2) reboot your phone
3) airplane mode on
4) test "micro" with default settings!
I have US Amazon version, XT1032 16G Sandisk.
S. Read - 78,57
S. W - 17,85
can someone post his results? only me w/ these low write speads? ty
Are you using GPE or something else? Stock is the one that uses F2FS that provides blazing fast performance (as seen in benchmarks) in comparison to all the other roms (GPE mostly, I suppose custom roms too, correct me if I'm wrong) that use ext4.
Apart from that, kitkat does TRIM on the NAND so its performance shouldn't drop too much with use and time.
edit: ran the benchmark as you requested, everything seems fine here. 16GB version, stock 4.4.4 + aerokernel, latest version
My device is a stock 01/2014 16gb moto g.
Is a degradation like that normal for you guys? I have 3.7 GB free!
My results with stock rom 4.4.4 and decepticon kernel :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
There's a huge difference in readings...
Gpe converted xt1033 running Liquidsmooth with xpe 15
mmm
it seems i have very low write speeds. do you think i could fix something resetting my device?
pappalard0 said:
mmm
it seems i have very low write speeds. do you think i could fix something resetting my device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
up! am i the only one in this situation?? i wish i could wipe the device only at the release of android l !
pappalard0 said:
up! am i the only one in this situation?? i wish i could wipe the device only at the release of android l !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did anybody read this article ? http://andrux-and-me.blogspot.fr/2014/06/various-conditions-and-io-performance.html
Simply shows how I/O are instable if any single condition is modified, so, are you absolutely sure that NO condition has been changed ?
in antutu 5 i get near 400pts in the two storage benchs. i remember scoring something like 800/600..huston, we have a problem.
or is it normal and i only have to factory reset my phone?
Hi guys
Please put your AnTuTu Benchmark result number here so we know which Rom is the fastest and please tell us which Rom are you on
Here is mine :
sieuan rom (Full version)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=66326785&postcount=737
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
For accurate comparison please use version 6.1.4 of the AnTuTu Benchmark :
http://www.apkmirror.com/apk/antutu/antutu-benchmark/antutu-benchmark-6-1-4-release/antutu-benchmark-6-1-4-android-apk-download/
And AnTuTu 3DBench 6.0.4 version :
http://www.apkmirror.com/apk/antutu/antutu-3dbench/antutu-3dbench-6-0-4-release/antutu-3dbench-6-0-4-2-android-apk-download/
Has N900 development gotten so bad that we now open thread because of antutu benchmarks
LilClin said:
Has N900 development gotten so bad that we now open thread because of antutu benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No harm at seeing which Rom is doing its best performance over these years
So then tell us about your Rom?
Cm 13.1
Cm 13.1 11/05
But version is 6.2.6
Unofficial CyanogenMod 13.0 (ha_3g)
My test result
Cyanogenmod 13.0 11/5
Battery life expand 4h+ but its kinda laggy.
I cant put a image for rules.
51311
3D: 10743
UX: 19297
CPU: 16724
RAM: 4567
wajid iqbal said:
So then tell us about your Rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I put my rom's link above and you can check it out
If you're looking for battery life just use Kernel Toolkit and decrease the Maximum frequency of the Cpu (in Cpu tab)
Amhad Basher V 5.8 with suemax kernel (included on the rom)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-3/galaxy-note-3-exynos-android-development/n900n9000-bashergraceuxstylev5-8-5-9-t3454806
Note 3 N9005 on Phronesis Note 7 ROM, V4.0. Lss 3.8 kernel.
Stock bootloader and modem
Sent from my Note 3.7
Standard Note 3 Lte. N9005...with root.
Root with paid version of root booster installed and set to speed boost..
59830:good:
Sorry no image as i haven't posted 10 times yet.
Nearly as fast as my stock rom ?
Antutu benchmark
61782
3D 10010
UX 21001
Cpu 22526
Ram 8245
Arya rom
Darklord kernel V1.0