Related
A new technology startup, Stella Mira, is entering the compact computing arena with their new device, the Pocket Console. Like many other flash drive sized mini computers we have seen lately, the Pocket Console features an Arm Allwinner A10 chip clocked at 1.5GHz, along with 1GB of Ram and Wi-Fi built on board. It also includes Bluetooth 2.1 connectivity, like the FXI Cotton Candy. And 8GB of flash storage, which is double that of the popular MK802 mini computer. Best of all it's priced at $129, which although being priced higher than the MK802, is still significantly cheaper than the Cotton Candy. The device also features 3 full sized USB 2.0 ports, 1 mini USB port, and a microSD card slot. And, of course, an HDMI port, enabling it to connect to practically any screen around. As far as software goes, the device runs Mira's customized version of android four dot zero, which is said to include a variety of popular apps preloaded such as spotify and angry birds along with support for the most popular game pads, and emulators are built right into it. Stella Mira has also announced that they will begin accepting pre orders in September for a 3G capable version of the Pocket Console. You can also buy a dock like accessory for your Pocket Console, unsurprisingly called the Pocket Dock which comes pre loaded with your favorite Linux distro (granted it can run on the Pocket Console). Stella Mira's website claims that they have built customized versions of both Lubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 12.04 that run "beautifully". Not much information is given of what these customized versions entail so that remains to be seen in the near future. I have reached out to Stella Mira and am awaiting more information on the Pocket Console and Pocket Dock. Until I hear back, the Pocket Console seems to be a really great contender in the mini pc market and for $129 I really don't think you could regret giving it a try, I know I certainly will.
Couple of corrections, it's not a 1.5 ghz a10 cpu it is actually a 1 ghz single core a8 cpu and mali 400 gpu. It is the board that is called an a10 as in allwinner a10.
The 1.5 ghz comes from people adding the gpu and cpu frequencies together. If you see the ebay page you will see this is how they arrive at that clock speed but it isn't actually that speed.
The 3G version is to be nearly $200 and even at $129 for basic four gig version with no extras this will be dearer than the next mk802 yet have the same specs.
Unless it sells for as good or better price than the next mk will do, the mira pc won't do as well not least because it only ships to usa and is dearer than similar spec products.
It isn't really offering anything new other than bluetooth (which new mk will apparently have) and the dock.
It is a nice design but as, when it begins shipping (and even then only to some who order early because others have to wait) there will be equally specced devices cheaper, it will need more than it has to create a lot of orders.
It certainly needs to be available in europe and start a little lower in price and to make more advertising advantage of its heatsink feature (if its promo pics are accurate it may have one).
Dave
( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk 2
tradesteady said:
Yes, Get to know that the Android Mini PC factory will also released the 3G mini pc, and it will arm with dual core,the price not in public yet just wait and see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your link doesn't show anything other than 3G modems. How does that pertain to the op's hdmi pc post?
Dave
( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk 2
As an observation, The MK802 already does have bluetooth possibility. just not in the stock firmware. I am running lubuntu on mine, and bluetooth works just fine. And as others have already stated, all the allwinner a10 devices are really only 1.0ghz not 1.5. I don't see anything with this new device worth spending almost double the $68 my MK802 cost me.
Just to get it out there, I'm not a complete idiot, obviously this is debatable due to architectural differences and what have you but I think we're at the stage where modern phones can hold their own against the average PC.
For example my laptop (AMD-E450 1.65GHz dual/Radeon 6850/4GB RAM) plays 1080p video with a lot to be desired. YouTube 1080p plays at low fps, and local 1080p is just straight up lag.
A lot of our devices today can breeze through such tasks without breaking a sweat and we take it for granted!
What do you think? Is your smartphone 'faster' than your PC?
I was thinking the exact same thing the other day, while I agree with the different architectures between phone and PC, my phones blow it to hell as far as YouTube is concerned. Same as you really, sluggish lag on PC when handling 1080p but on my smaller devices it's a breeze. And my pc is not low end nor high end by any means.
Sometimes my Smartphone is faster even than my PC, who has a AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE processor, 4GB of RAM. But of course I can't complain too much because I am on my PC one of heavy users, and on my smartphone - not. And on the future perhaps I will upgrade my PC (especially RAM) :silly:
When comparing raw performance, x86 will almost always beat out ARM (the type of processor in your phone). When comparing performance per watt, ARM beats x86 -- that's why your phone usually outlasts your laptop.
However, there are a few other different reasons for the gap in performance.
1 - Hardware decoders. Most smartphones, in order to save CPU power and wattage, include video decoders in the hardware. That way, whenever you want to watch a YouTube video, the dedicated chip takes care of the processing and CPU usage remains minimal. On the PC side, hardware video decoders usually only appear in some types of video cards. Chances are, if you have a cheap, $349 notebook, you've got minimal processing power to start with, and the CPU gets stuck with everything.
2 - Software. If you took the same computer you have today and put a Linux distribution on it, you'd probably get better raw performance than Windows with the usual Windows overhead + PC maker crapware + spyware infections + whatever other applications are in the background combination I usually see. I say "probably better" because there are always PCs with hardware that isn't fully supported yet, which causes performance issues particularly when it comes to video hardware.
i have been thinking of this for some time now. but compared to my computer, my computer is way faster with an intel i7 2700k and a radeon hd 7870 but compared to some laptops and low end desktops our phones can handle just about the same thing that they can handle. our phones can play some nice graphic games like real racing 3. im sure that game would make some low end computers lag at playing that game
not fast but i can play amazing spiderman and the dark knight in my phone
but cant play it in my pc :/
I have no idea, as Android still can't run Windows games. (What I wouldnt give to be able to run Skyrim on my tab... Splashtop is useless without wifi.) But the blame for that lies with game developers, not Google or Android itself.
I need to replace the gpu in my laptop as it's starting to become a bottleneck, (gt 130m), but other than, my laptop is probably faster.
Also, screen resolution on my phone is WAY lower than my computer, so it's a seriously unfair comparison, lower resolution always means higher framerate, as it has to render less.
On an 1280x800 screen, it only has to render 74% of a Full HD video, as opposed to the full 100% (and more) on a 1920x1400 screen.
Send From My Samsung Galaxy S3 Using Tapatalk 2
yeah , my pc is just like a slow runner(need to find new one !!!!) , my new xperia is just like ALIENWARE !! Thanks SONY Corporation
I think PC is faster. My alienware beats the s**t out of my note 2 anyday.
My PC is faster.
I can certainly see that this is not the case for everyone. My friend's laptop can't run a DS emulator very well, my phone can at about 2/3 speed, and my PC can at full speed.
My PC can run both an HD Game of Thrones rip (we own it on Blu Ray) and run the Dolphin Game Cube emulator playing Twilight Princess at full speed - at the same time.
And it's not even that great a PC - it's just a mid-range gaming set-up that I built because I wanted to play GW2 and Skyrim (not the most demanding games) at maximum shininess.
Did some googling and it appears today's phone CPUs would be equal to about a Pentium D computationally.
You need a few more generations to really close the gap. Any perceptions of them being faster is based on the overall architecture of the phones.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
PC faster, my galaxy mini is slow, galaxy w is normal
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Additions from a stranger
crayz9000 said:
When comparing raw performance, x86 will almost always beat out ARM (the type of processor in your phone). When comparing performance per watt, ARM beats x86 -- that's why your phone usually outlasts your laptop.
However, there are a few other different reasons for the gap in performance.
1 - Hardware decoders. Most smartphones, in order to save CPU power and wattage, include video decoders in the hardware. That way, whenever you want to watch a YouTube video, the dedicated chip takes care of the processing and CPU usage remains minimal. On the PC side, hardware video decoders usually only appear in some types of video cards. Chances are, if you have a cheap, $349 notebook, you've got minimal processing power to start with, and the CPU gets stuck with everything.
2 - Software. If you took the same computer you have today and put a Linux distribution on it, you'd probably get better raw performance than Windows with the usual Windows overhead + PC maker crapware + spyware infections + whatever other applications are in the background combination I usually see. I say "probably better" because there are always PCs with hardware that isn't fully supported yet, which causes performance issues particularly when it comes to video hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to add to what this poster has already stated:
3 - Possessor Channels. They are kinda like interstate highways for programming languages that pass information that is recognized as a supported without a whole lot of extra emulation or superfluous handling. Apparently ARM has many more channels than IBM or AMD; google it and be surprised.
4 - Openstack. Why compare differences and get all caught up with what can and can't be done on an individual hardware set-up(s), instead lets join them all together into one virtual machine and never worry about speed or ram again.. this is what I'm working on and there is promise that one day we will all be able to run any program or operating system with any collection of old hardware.
my HOX now with viperx 3.6 is iqual in speed to my laptop.(lenovo p4)
My pc still faster
Sent from jamban umum.
Yeah I agree my HTC is faster than my old P4 Windows XP.
Well, yes. Nexus One 1GHZ 512MB RAM vs Athon 850Mhz 364MB RAM
My htc desire plays 720p 10x faster than my P4 desktop. It's a real shame, my mother paid 3 grand for that HP back in 2004. Look at the progression of technology...
It's a shame that my phone faster than my PC ,, but thanks to my PC i can finish my assignments faster.. can i use phone to do it ?LoL :what:
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
pc: 4gb ram dragon, ati radeon hd 4870, amd phenom quadcore, disk Samsung 1tb with linux mint 14 nadia xfce enviroment. vs galaxy s3 i9300
Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 2
I've been wanting to buy something like this or this (which is not technically on a stick...) for a while now. When they all had Allwinner A10s I waited for better hardware, but now that better hardware's here - the ones I linked have quadcore CPUs and two gigs of RAM - I think I've done enough waiting.
Right now I'm using my main box (quadcore gaming computer) for everything, but it's hardly efficient when I'm not actually gaming. My idea is to use the tiny-puter with my 27" 1080p screen for light-duty things; by this I mean browsing the net, watching youtube videos and so on.
The only doubt I have is that I don't really know how effective these things are in this role. I don't want to have to wait for the CPU to render webpages; I've had to endure enough of that on my ancient Atom netbook.
What's your experience in using Android sticks?
Nobody at all?
So today Razer has officially taken the wraps off their Forge TV. Even if you already own a Nexus Player you will still benefit from this announcement. The purpose of this post is to highlight the key differences and similarities between the two, and to highlight what the Forge TV brings to the larger Android TV ecosystem.
http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-forge-tv
Specs:
The Nexus Player uses a quad-core Intel Atom 64-bit @ 1.8ghz, a PowerVR 6-series GPU, and, 1GB of RAM. The Forge uses a Snapdragon 805 SOC which features a quad-core Krait 450 CPU @ 2.5ghz, an Adreno 420 GPU, and 2GB of RAM.
The Nexus Player offers support for 64-bit whereas the Forge is limited to 32-bit. Also, the jury's still out on performance, but most benchmarks place the Intel SCOC on par with the Snapdragon 805 (behind, obviously, in apps that aren't made for x86). Overall, I'm confident enough to suggest that performance will likely be in the same neighborhood on both devices. And as a Nexus Player owner, I can tell you that I haven't run into an area yet where the 1GB of RAM has been a limitation. So to me, it comes down to 64-bit versus extra RAM. Pick your future-proofing poison.
It should also be noted that the Forge TV has proper gigabit ethernet and USB 3.0 output, compared to the Micro USB 2.0 found on the Nexus Player. You'll need adapters to get proper USB and ethernet functionality, and even then, you're limited to 100megabit ethernet at best.
Gamepad:
The announcement of the Razer Forge TV brings us the first truly good first-party Android TV gamepad. Many of you have read my complaints, but Google/Asus inexplicably FORGOT to have a start and/or select button. And they placed the home button in a location where you'd expect there to be a start button. The end result is poor compatibility with some games (Soul Calibur), difficulty mapping with many emulators, and accidentally exiting the game when you had intended to pause it.
http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-controllers/razer-serval
The Serval gamepad brings the back/home buttons down to the base of the gamepad, where they belong. The power/mode button remains top/center, but is less prominent. It's now flanked by back/forward buttons that are likely/hopefully intended to be start/select mappable.
It also supports wired/wireless connectivity, remembers up to 4 connected devices so you're not constantly pairing it with alternate systems, and seems to support some form of phone mount for on-the-go gaming. Overall, this is the gamepad that we should have originally gotten, and yes, it should work with your Nexus Player.
The Software:
The unique software here is support for Razer Cortex Stream. This will allow you to stream your PC games to your HDTV. It will be free for Forge TV owners, and $40 for everyone else. This solution will support older GPUs and non-Nvidia GPUs, so it's more flexible than the current options. Again, it looks like you won't need a Forge TV to take advantage of this. You should be able to purchase it for your existing Nexus Player. One caveat: may not be available at launch for the Forge TV, as the Forge is slated for a 1Q 2015 launch, while Stream is slated to go into beta during 1H 2015. Also, Razer is notorious for missing launch windows (Forge TV was previously slated for Fall 2014).
Storage:
I didn't list this under specs because it warrants its own discussion. The Nexus Player has 8GB of storage, and the Razer Forge TV has 16GB. To be perfectly honest, I'm not happy with either option. But with that said, I have 3.1GB remaining on my Nexus Player. That includes several Android games, Kodi, several emulators, and numerous ROMs. I don't have the space to emulate CD-based systems easily, but the old cart-based systems are fine. Having 16GB would give me a little more wiggle room, but 64/128GB options would be preferable for those who want to do serious emulation. With that said, the 8GB of the Nexus Player is more than adequate for someone who wants a streaming device with some light gaming. The additional 8GB on the Forge TV will make the gaming aspect a bit easier.
Remote:
The Nexus Player comes with a generic, yet adequate Bluetooth Remote. There's also a remote app, but it crashes a lot, loses connectivity, and it's limited to Android (my wife is an iPhone user). So, the physical remote is a necessity for us. The Razer seems to lack a physical remote. Instead you're to use a smartphone app (different from the Google app, briefly demonstrated on a Samsung phone in the Razer video, linked below). This app is compatible with Android an iOS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_A1gyYRTgc
Conclusion:
We have comparable hardware at a similar price. People who are simply looking for a high-quality streaming device with extras will prefer the Nexus Player, which has an actual remote. Those who are looking for a more gaming-oriented focus will appreciate the Stream app and extra storage and RAM of the Forge TV. However, there's nothing preventing you from using the Serval gamepad with a Nexus Player, nor using Stream with a Nexus Player. Ultimately, the choice of device will come down to your balance between media consumption and gaming.
Or you could be like me - Move the Nexus Player upstairs to the bedroom, the Forge tV downstairs in the living room, and sync the NP's remote to the Forge TV instead (using a gamepad upstairs).
I have the nexus player and am loving it. I am curious if the Forge TV will be better than it in regards to performance. However I mainly use my Nexus player for media consumption and the retro emulators.
There is no guarantee that the NP remote will pair with the ForgeTV. Remember that I can pair my NP remote and Fire TV remote with my Note 4, but I could not pair the NP remote with the Fire TV or the Fire TV remote with the NP. The ForgeTV may have similar restrictions.
I'm actually really interested in the control. Sounds like a much better designed controller. plus I like that it has the attachment to put your phone on it. I've been looking for a control I can use on my phone and PC . I carry a DS4 controller w/ the Nyko smart clip in my backpack and it works great on my Surface w/ Win 8.1 and holds my phone but I have to run a cable to my phone for it to work since I can't run sixaxis due to no root. If I'm going to pull the trigger on the control might as well get the bundle. Whichever one I like better will go in the living room and the loser in the bedroom. (Loser in the bedroom. That's what she said.)
IBNobody said:
There is no guarantee that the NP remote will pair with the ForgeTV. Remember that I can pair my NP remote and Fire TV remote with my Note 4, but I could not pair the NP remote with the Fire TV or the Fire TV remote with the NP. The ForgeTV may have similar restrictions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus Player and the Forge TV both run the Android TV OS. It is highly unlikely that the NP's remote won't pair with the Forge TV. However, I'll report back on this once the Forge TV is released. I'll own it day one (plus shipping, if no brick and mortar availability).
IBNobody said:
There is no guarantee that the NP remote will pair with the ForgeTV. Remember that I can pair my NP remote and Fire TV remote with my Note 4, but I could not pair the NP remote with the Fire TV or the Fire TV remote with the NP. The ForgeTV may have similar restrictions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Suprised to hear you could not get the NP remote to work with the Fire TV. Did you try sideloading settings.apk on the Fire TV and then try pairing the NP remote?
Link to download settings.apk - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=57129257&postcount=20
mr3p said:
Suprised to hear you could not get the NP remote to work with the Fire TV. Did you try sideloading settings.apk on the Fire TV and then try pairing the NP remote?
Link to download settings.apk - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=57129257&postcount=20
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I was able to pair my keyboard, but not my NP remote. No big deal. I would have rather used my AFTV remote on the AFTV because it is infinitely better.
It's too bad that the NP has a gimped Bluetooth interface. I would love to pair that AFTV remote. There isn't a better settings apk for lollipop, is there?
Sent from my SM-N910P using XDA Free mobile app
Android on the Nexus Player is only 32 bit. While the SoC may be 64bit, it's likely that Google will never release a 64bit version for it, and doubtful that drivers are ever available for 3rd parties to build build their own.
IMO, the Razer Forge TV is the better system... but I personally won't be buying anymore Android TV's until Google makes them work at least reliably and adds audio passthrough.
Luxferro said:
Android on the Nexus Player is only 32 bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source? This contradicts everything that is currently known, so you're going to need to back that up with some evidence.
Luxferro said:
IMO, the Razer Forge TV is the better system... but I personally won't be buying anymore Android TV's until Google makes them work at least reliably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Nexus Player has had few more issues than my Roku, and far less than my WDTV Live SMP. I understand your audio pass-through concerns, but right now it seems like you're just fabricating things to support your point of view. I am, however, open to being proven wrong if you're capable of backing up your claims.
jaykresge said:
Source? This contradicts everything that is currently known, so you're going to need to back that up with some evidence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's pretty commonly known. The only Nexus device that actually runs 64 bit Android is the Nexus 9. You can look at the source code.
-include vendor/intel/fugu/BoardConfigVendor.mk
TARGET_ARCH := x86
TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT := silvermont
TARGET_CPU_ABI := x86
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://android.googlesource.com/device/asus/fugu/+/lollipop-release/BoardConfig.mk
vs.
-include vendor/htc/flounder/BoardConfigVendor.mk
# Build a separate vendor.img
TARGET_COPY_OUT_VENDOR := vendor
TARGET_ARCH := arm64
TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT := armv8-a
TARGET_CPU_ABI := arm64-v8a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://android.googlesource.com/device/htc/flounder/+/lollipop-release/BoardConfig.mk
@TheManii Back me up if I'm correct ;p
Luxferro said:
It's pretty commonly known. The only Nexus device that actually runs 64 bit Android is the Nexus 9. You can look at the source code.
https://android.googlesource.com/device/asus/fugu/+/lollipop-release/BoardConfig.mk
vs.
https://android.googlesource.com/device/htc/flounder/+/lollipop-release/BoardConfig.mk
@TheManii Back me up if I'm correct ;p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's correct for the moment, the NP ships with a 64 bit atom, but the rom itself is 32 bit only.
Who knows if goog will upgrade it to a 64 bit rom, as they've been very consistant in the past that: if it did not ship with a feature, it generally will not get it enabled via an ota.
In the past, intel/microsoft have shipped 32 bit windows on atoms because they lacked 64 bit drivers. If that's also the reason the NP doesnt ship with android-64, then a custom rom won't be able to fix it unless they can make 32 bit drivers work on it, or make their own drivers.
As an aside: the remote (or rather the lack of need for the remote) is the reason I like my NP. the app is pretty reliable, it's the wifi on the NP that isnt.
My ADT-1 and NP work without any issues with the app when using wired ethernet.. My unupdated fire stick wont work with it's remote app, and it's a hassle to use in comparison.
Alright guys, thank you for the updated information.
FYI, there are 64-bit drivers for the Intel Atom x86-64 and Android L. The first 64-bit preview in October included support for Intel Atom x86 and Intel Atom x86-64, but only Android TV Intel Atom x86. Additionally, Intel's own development page for Lollipop currently shows that support for L-32 and L-64 is in progress but L-64 is not complete. Interestingly enough, they leave one blurb stating that one of their SDKs will NOT work on 64-bit software environments (and specifically lists the Nexus Player as an example).
Additionally, it was Intel Atom Cedarview that, while 64-bit in hardware, did not support 64-bit Windows. Silvermont has incomplete but functional 64-bit support in Linux and Windows.
TheManii said:
As an aside: the remote (or rather the lack of need for the remote) is the reason I like my NP. the app is pretty reliable, it's the wifi on the NP that isnt.
My ADT-1 and NP work without any issues with the app when using wired ethernet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't realise that the NP / Nexus Player had poor wireless performance.
What USB adapter are you using on the NP / Nexus Player to get wired Ethernet?
dabotsonline said:
I didn't realise that the NP / Nexus Player had poor wireless performance.
What USB adapter are you using on the NP / Nexus Player to get wired Ethernet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant really say if its poor per-se (as in it has reasonable performance even with 1080p youtube streams), just that if it disconnects, you can't reconnect it with the remote app in that case.
Besides that, I simply use the remote app on my NP and ADT1 as it means I don't have to actually use the physical remote. It's simply a hassle to reconnect wifi due to that.
I'm using my old wii ethernet adapter, as the ATV rom supports the chipset without any modifications (and I already had one lying around since I dont use my wii anyway)
I now wish that i had waited for the forge... the gigabit Ethernet is a huge deal... I have now tried 2 usb to ethernet adaptors and they are soooooooooooooooooo slow compared to the wireless AC. There is also issue with the casting functions when using Ethernet as well.
TheManii said:
As an aside: the remote (or rather the lack of need for the remote) is the reason I like my NP. the app is pretty reliable, it's the wifi on the NP that isnt.
My ADT-1 and NP work without any issues with the app when using wired ethernet.. My unupdated fire stick wont work with it's remote app, and it's a hassle to use in comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here are my thoughts on android TV kind of in regards to your comments
1) they can keep the remotes and just continue to improve cec as far as I'm concerned. I know there's people with old tvs who squawk at the thought, but while these little remotes are kind of cute they end up being the same PITA that hdmic-cec could have solved long ago. For me cec works great on the three displays I've tried it on
2) I sideloaded the sixaxis pair app to run my ps3 DS controllers with the NP (messes up default remote pairing, but since I already didn't care for the remote anyway I just keep using my OEM TV remote which is wifi-direct )
3) I use the NP for xbmc, casting, and limelight. Limelight is probably my favorite, but xbmc gets used the most as the wife doesn't enjoy watching me play games for very long
4) in an xbmc and cast oriented setup android and iOS are both potential remote sources with cec and ps3 controller being fall backs - plenty of options
5) ac-wifi on the NP has been very reliable for my environment. I've been running an ac68u router for a while, and thought I'd get the itch to upgrade to the 87 but I don't think that'll be necessary. Performance is great, game streaming is great, I'm overall happy. For the same price I'd have probably taken a second hand adt1, but those aren't selling too cheap right now
Apps?
Guys... great insight on both devices, now I wonder if both can support side-loading apps (which I guess they do) and which are the best ones you tried already that works better on Android TV.
For example, has anyone tried out PopCorn Time on any XBMC version?
Thanks.
-Pichi
Forge TV clearly has better hardware IMO, but what about software? Nexus phones, for example, run the latest pure Android as well as any custom ROM you like for years after release. Other non-Nexus phones run Android but Nexus has always been on top in terms of update longevity and developer-friendliness. There's already a Lollipop port for the Nexus Player. How do you think the Forge TV will compare?
is anyone here skilled to make some roms for forge? you can root it with kingroot then replace it with supersu..
More on Forge yet?
Any decent reviews of Android TV boxes? I just want to get a decent Android box to stream NetFlix, Amazon Prime, ShowBox and Kodi in 4K on a box with a fairly new version of Android.
Best Android TV box
Hi if you are looking for decent android TV box then you can check EVANPO T95Z PLUS Smart TV Box. It's review on amazon look great.
CayenneGTS said:
Any decent reviews of Android TV boxes? I just want to get a decent Android box to stream NetFlix, Amazon Prime, ShowBox and Kodi in 4K on a box with a fairly new version of Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I've been looking for cheaper android tv boxes for iptv for friends, I can say without a doubt Nvidia Shield is by far the best. I've had mine since 2015, and the newer 2017 model is shrunk down same innards. 3gb ram, Nvidia Tegra processor is the best on it. Netflix full 4K HDR support officially. Official real android TV that receives updates all the time (Currently they are intentionally waiting to release Android Oreo on it as launcher is not good yet and are working with Google on that, but it's pretty solid with Marshmallow official androidtv version). Amazon Prime 4K HDR built in (first android tv to get it officially actually).
HDR support on every app Except Youtube... simply because Youtube uses a different Codec VP9 that requires a specific chip that came out after Shield was released. I'm using PerfectPlayer for IPTV on it now and it's really impressive with customized hardware decoding. Kodi runs great on it too when I tried it. Not sure about Showbox but do keep in mind the Google Play Store on official Android TV is limited to Apps that developers specifically support TV interface on. You can easily use your phone or browser to get the APK and install it on the Shield though if you can't find it in store. They call this sideloading and it works great once you figure out how. I personally use Solid Explorer on both Shield and my phone and find apk in the app on my phone, then copy it over the network to my Shield Network Shared folder (officially supported), then open it on Shield and install it.)
Keep in mind Nvidia shield will work with anything bluetooth and it does support Android TV Remote app so you can control and type from your phone. 2 USB 3.0 ports so you can even connect older xbox 360 controllers if you have pc dongle, etc..
Problem I'm seeing with every other Android TV Box is they're all Android Phone version with an added UI to make it look like Android TV, and I really feel like most of them won't get updated and might freeze if you push it with limited RAM and chinese-made processors. Official Android TV FTW. Honorable mention from research not experience - Xiaomi Mi Box, built in Android TV on non samsung/nonlg tvs... especially on Sony Android TV.
I have a very simple box, but very good for streaming MXQ PRO. Very inexpensive - $35. I got it from AMTRADE TV Boxes
I've just purchased a new box from China that I'm waiting delivery on. I had help from Robert Joseph of ghostware. He's awesome.
This is the info and specs on it. Like I said it has everything I want and even a little more with the extra hard drive space for which I've ordered a 240gig SSD drive from Amazon.
I got the version with 4 gigs of RAM and 64 gigs of hard drive space. And it's pretty much dirt cheap for one of the best hardware setups on the market. Only about 65 US dollars.
These are some more of its specs. The gigabit Ethernet port is just as important as everything else. Especially if you have a fast connection like I do. You don't want to be limited to a hundred megabits.
I followed the advice SdM123, and I must say that Sidiwen A95X MAX TV Box Android 8.1 4GB RAM 64GB ROM Amlogic S905X2 Quad Core Dual WIFI 2.4G / 5G Ethernet is one of the best 0 buffering problems. I am satisfied with the purchase and thank SdM123 for pointing it out.
Cool
Which streaming device has the most internal storage?
Hi guys, what do you think of switchonshop.com ? I think to buy there, but I do not know if it is worth it.
At SwitchOnShop.com. I saw a set top box model MAG425A. Has anyone used such a model?