Asking about which s7 is with Snapdragon 820 and which version is Exynous 8890.
And also anyone know which is the best suit snapdragon or exynous one? Willing to know
There is already a thread comparing the Exynos 8890 with the Snapdragon 820 over here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s7/how-to/exynos-vs-snapdragon-benchmarks-t3319913
But to summarize it a little bit:
The general consensus seems to be that the Exynos 8890 has the fastest processor, while the Snapdragon 820 has the best performing graphics processor. Notably, the Exynos chip seems to be faster at single threaded as well as multithreaded workloads due to the high single/dual core frequency of 2.6 GHz, and it's total of 8 processing cores.
Some people are concerned about the power consumption of the Snapdragon 820, and believe the Exynos 8890 to be the more power efficient choice.
There have been some concerns about the cell reception on the Exynos 8890 version, leading some people to consider ordering the Snapdragon 820 version.
The last two points in particular should be taken with a pinch of salt until more people get their hands on the phones and conduct some proper tests.
Related
The news broke that the samsung galaxy s iii will be arriving to all major us carriers in June. here is the article on the verge.
The official announcement confirms that it will launch with Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 1.5 GHz dual core CPU and 2GB of internal RAM vs the Exynos 4212(5250 need to verify which version they used) 1.4 GHz Quad-core and 1 GB of internal RAM
Can someone that knows what they are talking about tell me if there's a significant difference between the two specs I presented and which one will be faster vs battery consumption?
I am a T-Mobile customer, and looks like the SGSIII is said to come with HSPA+ with 42Mbps+, while the international version will be HSPA+ with 21Mbps+, on paper it is double the speed, what is the difference, is there sufficient coverage? I looked at the map for T-Mobile Data and they only show the strength of signal and don't differentiate the two.
so far here's the only real answer i've gotten on this topic?? anyone agrees?? disagrees? why?
krepler said:
Let me start by saying I'm not a pro when it comes to electronics but I do have an understanding on the subject.
The thing to realize about these processors, and most other processors available today, is that the s4 is based on the cortex a15 while the tegra 3 along with the new Samsung are based on the a9. The a15, at the same Hz and die size is 40% faster than the a9.
S4 = dual core Cortex A15 @ 1.5GHz - 28NM
Tegra3 = quad core Cortex A9 @ 1.5GHz - 40NM
Exynos 4(Samsung) = quad core Cortex A9 @ 1.5GHz - 32NM
S4 so far, in theory, is 40% faster per core, but having two less. Individual apps will run faster unless they utilize all four cores on the tegra3. Because the s4 has a smaller die size, it will consume less energy per core.
The actual technology behind these chips that the manufacturers come up with will also affect the performance output, but the general idea is there. Hope that helps to understand a little better how the two chips will differ in performance.
Sent from my shiny One XL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry if i'm posting in wrong section, I thought of posting it in the GSIII general forum, but only international versions available, I'll get biased answers, my guess is also the SII users at least recent ones won't be upgrading, and I know the HTC One users will just try to make it look like their phone is better. I need an unbiased opinion. lol
Does anyone else think that the new-generation Exynos SoC will support 802.11ac and LTE-A? Or playing back 1080p video at 60 fps and 2k quality at 30 fps? These are features which were never really discussed about the chipset itself.
The Snapdragon 800 was confirmed to have compatibility and capability of all of the aforementioned. It sounds as if the Snapdragon 800 series will be the superior chipset, while the Exynos Octa will likely provide better power efficiency in some regard. It would be pretty disappointing if the Galaxy S IV got stuck with a Snapdragon 600 processor, given the date it's likely going to be pushed out on. It might make me consider the Note this time around.
i really hope all these rumors are fake, samsung should use Exynos on there flagship Galaxy S line ! if not the octa, maybe the Exynos 5 Quad Core 1.8-2.0GHz !
All the Snapdragon 600 happens to be is a mid-tear SoC, which improves upon the same GPU and performance of the S4 Pro. Real A15 architectures should blow this chipset out of the water. People seem to think that what they see now is good. But when the Snapdragon 800 and other A15-based chips start making their debut, this will feel dated quickly in the coming months.
megagodx said:
All the Snapdragon 600 happens to be is a mid-tear SoC, which improves upon the same GPU and performance of the S4 Pro. Real A15 architectures should blow this chipset out of the water. People seem to think that what they see now is good. But when the Snapdragon 800 and other A15-based chips start making their debut, this will feel dated quickly in the coming months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
clock-per-clock a15 is just 15% faster than krait, dont think that there's so much differences between the two.
they are both really solid performers and the batle is all on the maximum clock/power required rateo.
The SD800 will also feature Quick Charge 2.0, which is supposed to charge your battery 75% faster than other SoC chipsets without that same function. SD600 doesn't feature that either. I'm pretty sure if you seen the initial Tegra 4 benchmarks (based off of real A15 architecture) - they wipe the floor with the HTC One's SD600. Being 75% increased in performance over the Snapdragon S4 Pro (last year's best mobile SoC), the SD800 should bring comparatively the same or better results than the T4 mentioned. That's kind of going to be a disappointment if the S IV ends up with a SD600 and no Exynos 5 Quad/Octa, at least.
Hi folks, I was thinking of buying a Korean S7 but worried about the temperature of the processor.
To set a baseline, I'm pretty happy with the temperatures of Snapdragon 625 or 636. How does the Exynos 8890 go up against those mid range Snapdragons?
Thank you.
There was a problem with the s10 exynos and snapdragon where the exynos standby battery life was noticeably worser than the snapdragon version. I'm just wondering if the new 7nm exynos processor for the exynos narrows this gap in standby battery life compared to the older 8nm exynos found in the s10.
Hi, In my hand are two notes 20Ultra .One SM-N9860DS second SM-N986BDS. So first is with Snapdragon and last it is Exynos. I have the same aplication, level system. So start situation for benchmark test is parallel. I have tried Geekbench5, Geekbench4, 3DMark and more then 3/4 tests Exynos is better then Snapdragon. Quite different theory we can find in Internet... To that my first experience was with SM-N986U1 from US and this model was always better to Exynos 200- 250 pkt in Geekbench5. To tell You truth I don't undrestend: it is sowtware problem or other issues?
Last resalts 3DMark
Snapdragon 4134 pkt
Exynos 4232 pkt.
Do You have the same experience ?
I've seen exynos at 540000,with continuous drop in scores after several tests. Here is mine sd variant
Is it Antutu?
What is Youre Exynos resalts? That what I found in media , that no procesor generate the problem but the cooling system. If You have grafen inside Exynos will working very well. Unfortunately no-one know what we have in own hand.
BR
Yes Antutu snapdragon.I don't have exynos but have seen on youtube.
The exynos is slower than the snapdragon also throttles faster. Several test show this...
Hi, I have got 600086. Whats resalts You have others owners... How about Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra with 16GB RAM and Snapdragons CPU?