Hello All,
I'm looking at either the BLU Vivo IV 5.5mm, or the BLU Vivo Air LTE 5.1mm,
I just love the super thin design of them both.. but, I'm kind of a newb to cell tech!?
What I'm not sure about are the Chipset/CPU & GPU, I've read quite a bit about them both & I'm still not quite sure what is better!? lol
Q: Which phone is better/faster?
Specs:
BLU Vivo IV. MAY 2014. NOW $250.
Size: 5.0 inches. BETTER!
Resolution: Super AMOLED, 1080 x 1920 pixels (441 ppi). BETTER!
Chipset: Mediatek MT6592. NOT SURE?
CPU: Octa-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A7. NOT SURE?
GPU: Mali-450MP4. NOT SURE?
Memory: 16 GB, 2 GB RAM. SAME.
Camera: 13MP/5MP. BETTER!
Battery: 2300 mAh. BETTER!
BLU Vivo Air LTE. SEP 2015. NOW $150.
Size: 4.8 inches. WORSE!
Resolution: AMOLED, 720 x 1280 pixels (306 ppi). WORSE!
Chipset: Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410. NOT SURE?
CPU: Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53. NOT SURE?
GPU: Adreno 306. NOT SURE?
Memory: 16 GB, 2 GB RAM. SAME.
Camera: 8MP/5MP. WORSE!
Battery: 2050 mAh. WORSE!
Use: I'll be using the phone for calls (1-2 a week), light gaming, would like good graphics/FPS, & using as a security device for two step authentication for online accounts etc.
Thanks for the help, Phil B.
In terms of which is faster the blu vivo iv has better specifications and is faster then the air. Also because of the airs smaller and lower res screen and lower res camera I think the iv would be the better choice. However if you want the phone as thin as possible and would like to pay a bit less then the air may not be a bad choice though I think the 4 would be better for your needs.
Just my thoughts and the choice is up to you in the ene.
Hope this helps.
Go here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1620179
Thread closed.
Related
Here are the hardware specs and benchmarks given by iGyaan
Screen: 4.3-inch Super AMOLED
Operating System: Android 4.0 OS
Processor: 1GHz processor
Camera: 8MP camera with flash, 0.3MP front-facing camera
Memory: 512MB RAM, expandable through MicroSD up to 32GB
Connectivity: 3G, Bluetooth 2.1, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, GPS, Micro USB
Battery: 1600 mAh battery
CPU : ARMv7 Processer rev 10 (v7l)
Hw: MT 6575
GPU : PowerVR's Series5 SGX 531
RAM : 512 mb
Benchmarks:
Nenamark2= 24.3 fps
Quadrant score of 2543
anTuTu=3887
Ok, so this is a MediaTek processor and PowerVR GPU. I can not see the relevance for the Ideos X6 & clone (Qualcomm CPU+GPU) development.
mmaacc said:
Ok, so this is a MediaTek processor and PowerVR GPU. I can not see the relevance for the Ideos X6 & clone (Qualcomm CPU+GPU) development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is the full review on the phone.(Cant post link I have lest posts... Just goto igyaan and check the A90 review)
I have few questions?
Is this phone rootable?
Are there any custom roms suiting to this proccy n all?
Thank you.
NEED HELP
swapnil0545 said:
Here is the full review on the phone.(Cant post link I have lest posts... Just goto igyaan and check the A90 review)
I have few questions?
Is this phone rootable?
Are there any custom roms suiting to this proccy n all?
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can anyone tell me about this !
which one is better ?
AMOLED 16.8 MILLION WITH 191 ppi pixel density ! OR
Super AMOLED 262k disply with 217 ppi pixel density !
one more thing is which one is better Processor + GPU
MTK6575 with PowerVR GPU ! or
Qualcomm MSM7225AA WITH ADRENO 200 GPU !
PLEASE ANSWER ME DEVS HURRY ! I WAS CONFUSED BETWEEN TWO DEVICES ! SO ITS BETTER TO CHECK FIRST
This is just for future reference, if better hardware aren't out at better prices already. Which is better? I don't really care about how "pure" the OS is, as I can just flash ROMs on any of them.
I'm most concerned with:
CPU: Qualcomm APQ8060 @ 1.5GHz vs. TI OMAP 4460 @ 1.2GHz
GPU: Qualcomm Adreno 220 vs. PowerVR SGX540
dennis96411 said:
This is just for future reference, if better hardware aren't out at better prices already. Which is better? I don't really care about how "pure" the OS is, as I can just flash ROMs on any of them.
I'm most concerned with:
CPU: Qualcomm APQ8060 @ 1.5GHz vs. TI OMAP 4460 @ 1.2GHz
GPU: Qualcomm Adreno 220 vs. PowerVR SGX540
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. I narrowed down my choices to these 2 phones.
zener773 said:
Good question. I narrowed down my choices to these 2 phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since both have the same chipset, cpu and gpu I'd look at other features.
The display specs shows a slight advantage of the Nexus:
SII Display
Type: Super AMOLED Plus capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Size: 480 x 800 pixels, 4.52 inches (~206 ppi pixel density)
Galaxy Nexus
Type: Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Size: 720 x 1280 pixels, 4.65 inches (~316 ppi pixel density)
However, the Nexus does not offer external storage.
For me it is a deal breaker.
If for you it is not important - then the Nexus has the upper hand.
I'll choose nexus. Its not a big gap in processor and gpu i think
I already chose the SII, I have it right now.
Sent from my Samsung SGH-T989 running CM10 by TeamChopsticks.
formula44 said:
I'll choose nexus. Its not a big gap in processor and gpu i think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse my ignorance, but does the T989 have a significant (definitive) performance edge over the GNEX??? That changes everything for me. Now if we can only get a Jellybean update.
Hi!
I wanted to try getting a samsung s3 clone. Already spotted some phone is our place having better specs but still I can decide which should I go that's why Im posting here to ask everyone who had tried this kind of phones.
My first choice and what I'm really been eyeing :
- QUAD-CORE ARMv7 PROCESSOR(VFPv3,NEON)
- SCREEN RESOLUTION: 720 x 1280
- GPU RENDERER: POWERVR SGX 531
- GPU VERSION (OPENGL): OPENGLE ES 2.0
- ANTUTU SCORE : 9789
Cant really tell exactly whats the actual CPU used but antutu doesnt detect it as any MTK cpu. The specs is really impressive except that it uses and SGX 531 for gpu at 720. I wonder if I could play NOVA 3 with this phone.
Second choice :
- CPU: Mediatek MT6577 1.4Ghz ( Dual Core )
- GPU: Mali 400 ( Quad GPU )
- RAM: 512MB DDR3
- Resolution: 720 x 1280 ( 16M Colors )
- Antutu Score : 6745
This phone has less impressive CPU but the gpu used is quite superior than of the first one. Seen someone using this and able to run NOVA 3. I know benchmark tools are not as realistic than of the actual use.
Both phones have :
- RAM: 512MB DDR3
- Storage: 4GB ROM ( 2.5GB Usable / Expandable up to 32GB Micro SD Card )
- Camera: Dual Camera 8MP Back & 1.3MP
- Connectivity: 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS
- SIM Card: Single SIM ( 1 Micro SIM )
- Operating System: Android v4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich
I really prefer to get the first one since its a quad-core and it scores a whooping 9k in antutu its only drawback is that it uses SGX531 gpu. Anybody tried playing HD games at 720p resolution with SGX531 gpu? Please tell me if NOVA 3 is playable in my first choice or should I trade the cpu for better gpu and get the second one?
Also, I was already able to watch this VIDEO i wonder if quadcore would make a difference in gameplay.
Thanks in advance for the response! :highfive:
any idea guys?
jhusly said:
any idea guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't buy sgx531, it's a low end gpu by today's standard. Mali400 is ALOT better and can play most games.
It's not point buying a quadcore cpu paired with a low end gpu, basically you will suffer at games.
I agree with tablighs...
Hi Friends,
This is my first post on XDA and I am quite novice in writing stuff.
Recently Motorola has launched its new flagship budget smart phone the MOTO E.
A brief introduction of this phone.
MOTO E is targeted at the lower end of the android market, with stiff competition from Samsung, Nokia, HTC and other brands already fighting for their space, Moto E comes as a complete package. The only thing it lacks is a FLASH for night photos. Overall it is a powerful device and starts a new trend in budget phone segment.
Specifications
4.3 inches (~256 ppi pixel density), 540 x 960 pixels.
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
4 GB Internal Memory with 1 GB RAM
5 MP Rare camera with 2592 х 1944 pixels resolution.
Video recording [email protected]
Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat) with Guaranteed upgrade to the next version.
Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
CPU: Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
GPU: Adreno 302
PRICE?????
USA: $129
INDIA: Rs 6999
UK: 89 Pounds
So what do you guys think is it HIT or a MISS???
Post your comments below.
Sachy711 said:
Hi Friends,
This is my first post on XDA and I am quite novice in writing stuff.
Recently Motorola has launched its new flagship budget smart phone the MOTO E.
A brief introduction of this phone.
MOTO E is targeted at the lower end of the android market, with stiff competition from Samsung, Nokia, HTC and other brands already fighting for their space, Moto E comes as a complete package. The only thing it lacks is a FLASH for night photos. Overall it is a powerful device and starts a new trend in budget phone segment.
Specifications
4.3 inches (~256 ppi pixel density), 540 x 960 pixels.
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
4 GB Internal Memory with 1 GB RAM
5 MP Rare camera with 2592 х 1944 pixels resolution.
Video recording [email protected]
Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat) with Guaranteed upgrade to the next version.
Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
CPU: Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
GPU: Adreno 302
PRICE?????
USA: $129
INDIA: Rs 6999
UK: 89 Pounds
So what do you guys think is it HIT or a MISS???
Post your comments below.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it would surely go on a rise ......processor too good and ram too....6999 rs...is worth
For new year I'm planning to buy new smartphone.
I spend over last week for reading smartphones reviews and specs from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 11,000. and sorted following some good phones in my view.
Asus Zenfone 2 Laser, Yu Yureka Plus, Lenovo K3 Note, Coolpad Note 3, Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime.
I request every member on xda-developers forum to give just your 1 min to vote in poll.:angel:
Key Specifications
Asus Zenfone 2 Laser
Display 5.50-inch
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 1.2GHz quad-core
Front Camera 5-megapixel
Resolution 720x1280 pixels
RAM 2GB
OS Android 5.0
Storage 16GB
Rear Camera 13-megapixel
Battery capacity 3000mAh
Yu Yureka Plus
Processor – 1.5 GHz Quad Core + 1 GHz Quad Core (Both Cortex-A53) Octa Core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 64-Bit Processor.
GPU – Adreno 405 GPU.
Ram – 2 GB DDR3 RAM.
Screen – 5.5 -inch IPS display ,HD resolution (1980 x 1080 pixels) – 401 PPI.
Corning Gorilla glass 3.
Camera – 13-Megapixel Rear Camera & 5 Megapixel front.
3G & 4G LTE support.
16 GB internal memory.
Android Lollipop 5.1.
Lenovo K3 Note
Android Lollipop 5.0 with Lenovo Vibe UI.
13 MP Rear Camera with Flash and Autofocus
5 MP Front Camera , Fixed Focus.
2 GB RAM
16 GB internal Storage , upto 32 GB using Micro SD card.
Dual Sim (GSM+GSM)
2G/3G support also supports 4G LTE
5.5 inch screen with HD resolution 1920*1080 FHD (401 PPI)
Good Simplistic Design
Battery Capacity is 3000 mAH , excellent optimization for increased battery life.
Mediatek 6752 Octacore processor clocked at 1.7 Ghz.
Mali-T 760MP2 GPU (Antutu Score – 45,700)
Coolpad Note 3
720 x 1280 pixels, 5.5 inches display.
3 Ghz Octa-core Mediatek processor.
3GB RAM
13 MP primary/5 MP secondary.
16 GB internal/expandable upto 32 GB.
Android Lollipop (cool UI)
Finger print sensor
3000 mAh battery
Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime
Processor – Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8928, Quad-core.
RAM – 2 GB
Android Version – Android 4.4 optimized with MIUI version 6 may get Android Lollipop.
Screen Size – 4.7-inch 720×1280-pixel IPS LCD screens.
Primary Camera – 8-megapixel rear auto-focus camera with LED flash, Front – 2-mega pixel.
Memory – 16 GB built-in storage expandable to 64 GB.
Connectivity – Supports 4G (FDD-LTE & TD-LTE), 3G(WCDMA).
Protection – Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
Battery Capacity – 2200 mAh.
In my view I think I will vote :good: Yu Yureka Plus
Again, I request every member on xda-developers forum to give just your 1 min to vote in poll.
Also, If i missed any other batter smartphone than these please suggest.