Database Info

Quadrant scores dropped after pershoot/VegaN install

Folks,
I was originally running the stock kernel + TnT Lite (latest) and using quadrant standard was achieving benchmark scores in the 2400's - now after installing pershoot kernel (latest with no modules) and the latest VegaN I am now seeing a score of just over 1700 - is this something I should be particularly concerned about? Are there, for lack of a better term, optimizations that are missing either from this ROM or kernel that are coming in the future?

Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's

CPU governor
I believe this is because pershoot uses the ondemand cpu governor instead of performance. Gives better battery, but benchmarks are lower. In daily use you really shouldn't see a difference as the cpu will ramp up when you need it.

that totally makes sense... thanks...

I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant

TheJesus said:
I have a custom compiled ROM from ejhart in #tegratab and I get 2000 in Quadrant but I run Dungeon Defenders flawlessly, so I could give two s**ts about Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too don't necessarily care about break-neck speed results in Quadrant but what I do care about is if lower scores are being caused by bleeding-edge drivers that may cause problems for me down the road vs. power saving techniques being employed by the kernel - hence my original question.
But at the end of the day, if what you need runs smoothly, then its all moot

Rumbleweed said:
Stock kernel and vegan tab 5.1 gets me mid 2400's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running VEGAn 5.1.1 with the stock kernel also but I am getting scores of 1800-1900 with Quadrant Standard
How can I figure out why I am not seeing a higher level of performance? Thanks.
Jay

Just ran it and got 2559 - Vegan 5.1.1 - Clemsyn Kernel and libsqlite.so and plenty of stuff running.
I'm pretty sure it has always been around 2100+ on any ROM or stock kernel I have tried.
That is strange..

[Q] Recommended clock for daily use

Hi everyone,
One question, on your daily use of Nexus S, what have you found to be the best clock - best performance/battery cost ratio?
I'm using the latest version of netarchy kernel with CM7 so taking the respective clock and voltage frequencies table under consideration, would you advise me to go all the way to 1.4 Ghz since it doesn't have much impact on the battery or should I have a more conservative approach and stick with 1 Ghz?
Thanks

[Q] How can I improve this?

Hey XDA,
Here is my quadrant results after recently flashing the Jelly Bean Hydro 7 ROM by seanzscreams:
http://i.imgur.com/woI3vdD.jpg
Also, I did install a few games, which might affect the result. However, are our devices really this lacking in comparison to the HTC One X, or am I just doing something wrong here? The kernal that is currently running is maxed at 1300 Mhz, and I also "supercharged" the device using V6 Supercharger by zepplinrox (I used the 1000HP setting). I'm aware that I can overclock my device a bit higher by flashing a new kernal, but will 300-400 Mhz really make a difference of 1000+ in Quadrant? I'm a heavy gamer, ranging from emulators to heavy games like Modern Combat and Dead Trigger, so performance is very important to me. Also, this benchmark was taken using "Performance Mode."
Basically what I'm asking here is this: What are you guys' Quadrant results, and if they are insanely higher than mine, what do you use to achieve it?
Thanks for the help in advance

Vonologic said:
Hey XDA,
Here is my quadrant results after recently flashing the Jelly Bean Hydro 7 ROM by seanzscreams:
http://i.imgur.com/woI3vdD.jpg
Also, I did install a few games, which might affect the result. However, are our devices really this lacking in comparison to the HTC One X, or am I just doing something wrong here? The kernal that is currently running is maxed at 1300 Mhz, and I also "supercharged" the device using V6 Supercharger by zepplinrox (I used the 1000HP setting). I'm aware that I can overclock my device a bit higher by flashing a new kernal, but will 300-400 Mhz really make a difference of 1000+ in Quadrant? I'm a heavy gamer, ranging from emulators to heavy games like Modern Combat and Dead Trigger, so performance is very important to me. Also, this benchmark was taken using "Performance Mode."
Basically what I'm asking here is this: What are you guys' Quadrant results, and if they are insanely higher than mine, what do you use to achieve it?
Thanks for the help in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attached are my results. Mine are insanely better than the HTC One X. Currently i'm on Hydro 6.1 (havent had the time to upgrade), running Clemsyns 1.8ghz OC kernel and I am in Performance Mode while running the test. I have no issues running any games, according to the benchmark I am doing 58-62fps. You should do what I've done if you're looking for good performance.

lightitwithfire said:
Attached are my results. Mine are insanely better than the HTC One X. Currently i'm on Hydro 6.1 (havent had the time to upgrade), running Clemsyns 1.8ghz OC kernel and I am in Performance Mode while running the test. I have no issues running any games, according to the benchmark I am doing 58-62fps. You should do what I've done if you're looking for good performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?

Vonologic said:
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use pegasus and sio for best performance on unter's kernel.

jgaf said:
I use pegasus and sio for best performance on unter's kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pegasus, as in PegasusQ? Isn't that samsung exclusive?

Vonologic said:
Thanks a lot for the response, much appreciated.
EDIT: What governer do you use btw and your setcpu min/max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Setcpu interactive min=760mhz max=1.8ghz

here's mine with clean ROM running tf700 kernel.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2

Here with hydro 7 unter's kernel pegasusq sio
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD

What is the fastest rom/kernel for the S6?

Is the Note 5 rom for the S6 the fastest one? And what kernel would make the S6 have the best ram management etc?
Maybe if you guys have some benchmarks to compare, it would help

Doctorhitch said:
Is the Note 5 rom for the S6 the fastest one? And what kernel would make the S6 have the best ram management etc?
Maybe if you guys have some benchmarks to compare, it would help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XtreStoLite and Arter Kernel is my combination and it works flawlessy. I capped it at 1500/1500 MHz for insane performance and are still having great battery.

You can also take a look at Xileforce's work over at his thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s6/samsung-galaxy-s-6--s-6-edge-unified-development/kernel-vindicator-t3156281/post63443095#post63443095 Good life and performance so far and he is very active on the kernel with updates and new additions.

MAKO 4.2 and Arters 7.2 kernel work flawlessly for me

I've tried the back-to-n0t3 for and the Arter kernel and it gave me around 70k on the antutu benchmark. Anyone got more?

Best speed and antutu benchmarks?

HOW to get the best performances out of the Galaxy S6?
Personally I just use XstreStoLite Deodexed rom as main system, with Hacker Kernel. Both type of cores are using interextrem governor and minimum frequency of 200mhz, but on the most powerful ones the clock is 2300mhz and on the others 1700?
I WILL do an antutu benchmark as soon as possibile and I really wanna see if there are better ways to improve performances.