Related
Just saw this on the front page and I thought maybe One X owners will want to give this a try:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1681183
Seems pretty easy to do but i'm guessing this will hurt battery life. Thoughts?
You guys already have a mod like this...kind of:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/take-control-of-your-htc-one-x-cores-with-corecontrol/
While it's not a mod per say, it's essentially the same concept: turn the cores off and on at will. The mod for the EVO LTE is simply turning on the 2nd core and leaving it on...pretty sure this gives you the same power.
I posted in vipers thread about getting it to work with the One X. I posted the file from our phone that needs to be modded for him to look at, when he gets back to me I'm going to post it over here.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
It makes exit transitions less choppy with both cores on, liking this
PoorCollegeGuy said:
You guys already have a mod like this...kind of:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/take-control-of-your-htc-one-x-cores-with-corecontrol/
While it's not a mod per say, it's essentially the same concept: turn the cores off and on at will. The mod for the EVO LTE is simply turning on the 2nd core and leaving it on...pretty sure this gives you the same power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's for the International One X..
Cryosx said:
It makes exit transitions less choppy with both cores on, liking this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you mod it yourself? its working?
---------- Post added at 06:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 AM ----------
gtung99 said:
Just saw this on the front page and I thought maybe One X owners will want to give this a try:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1681183
Seems pretty easy to do but i'm guessing this will hurt battery life. Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says some people are getting better battery life.. Definitely interested!!
nugzo said:
Did you mod it yourself? its working?
---------- Post added at 06:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 AM ----------
Says some people are getting better battery life.. Definitely interested!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just added that one line and changed the permissions in that other line. Battery life while playing music was terrible so I reverted back.
Cryosx said:
Just added that one line and changed the permissions in that other line. Battery life while playing music was terrible so I reverted back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i looked in to it but was confused. Original OP said he added two lines. When i searched it i found like 3 instances of the same line so i was unsure about just changing something, didnt think that would work... but i have no expertise to base it on, just assumption.
Check the DEV section. This has been ported over.
Can anyone help me understand this?
What program are you using? think the antutu benchmark is screwed right now as it CANT detect multiple cpus for our device...
ars0n said:
What program are you using? think the antutu benchmark is screwed right now as it CANT detect multiple cpus for our device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I was using. Any recommendations for a good benchmark?
I believe a lot of people are using the 3dmark for benching... honestly, i benched my phone when I first got it and it was around 58k I rarely have ever seen it higher. I was reading a while back that the antutu program cant see all of our cores correctly and thats why we get such low scores atm. I havent used 3dmark on this phone so cant really give you a comparison to mine. Are you super anal like me and just want to see the max capabilities of your phone vs others or just for piece of mind to know your phone is rock solid/fast? I go for both =D I want to see what my phone is like compared to others, but in the long run i think that does more damage than good. All these notes should be running identical and we dont know what settings and or apps other people have when they run the benchmark, the only for sure would be to make sure that every single person that is benchmarking is on a stock phone with NO tweaks or apps installed other than the benchmarking software..then compare..
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------
Also, if you go to the main samsung note 5 page on XDA there is a benchmarking forum you can read through to get a better idea.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/general/antutu-benchmark-t3253521
There is a link to it, but, I think you might end up driving your self crazy like I did going through it all.. lol..
ars0n said:
I believe a lot of people are using the 3dmark for benching... honestly, i benched my phone when I first got it and it was around 58k I rarely have ever seen it higher. I was reading a while back that the antutu program cant see all of our cores correctly and thats why we get such low scores atm. I havent used 3dmark on this phone so cant really give you a comparison to mine. Are you super anal like me and just want to see the max capabilities of your phone vs others or just for piece of mind to know your phone is rock solid/fast? I go for both =D I want to see what my phone is like compared to others, but in the long run i think that does more damage than good. All these notes should be running identical and we dont know what settings and or apps other people have when they run the benchmark, the only for sure would be to make sure that every single person that is benchmarking is on a stock phone with NO tweaks or apps installed other than the benchmarking software..then compare..
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------
Also, if you go to the main samsung note 5 page on XDA there is a benchmarking forum you can read through to get a better idea.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/general/antutu-benchmark-t3253521
There is a link to it, but, I think you might end up driving your self crazy like I did going through it all.. lol..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I really dint cate about the score, I just want to make sure that I don't have a problem. Dunce my multi core, and 3d don't appear to be skirting at all.
My antutu also would NOT run the garden scene correctly with out crashing after a few runs. had to reinstall to work and then eventually said F it.. lol..
Its hard to say when things happen to the phone that slow it down, most of the time it is an app... but the best option if unsure is to master reset and install only that app that is giving you issues and see if it fixes it. Also paying attention to comments on the app to see if any other users might be having the same problems before doing that master reset..
I usually find a new game or a game I know is graphic intensive, like hearthstone, GTA games or other and if the phone plays it fine, then no worries!
Keep rootedsystem.img in internel storage if somehow ur phone Bricks!!
due to lack of feedback I decided to discontinue this development.You can still use the files below and modify as u like.Instructions:
1.Plz use the attached zip extract
->Do back up ur files first..<-
2.Replace init.qcom.post_boot.sh and thermal-engine-8994.conf with extracted ones
3.Set permission rw-r-r
4.Power off wait the phone to cool down properly and bootup
5.Enable developer option and check "Disable hw Overlay" & (optionally) "Force GPU Composition"
6.Reboot Once more and get a cooler G flex 2
Do post some feedbacks and press thanks button if it helped you :laugh::laugh::angel::angel:
Tweaks:
Ondemand Governor
Underclocked big.CLUSTER to 1.83GHz
Underclocked little.CLUSTER to 1.38GHz
Applied Power_Tweaks for sd810 from OnePlus 2
Input boost frequency to 384MHz on cpu.2 & cpu.6 and 32ms input_boost
Applied GPU composition set on init(during boot)
Removed unwanted init.qcom.post_boot cases(Reduced init file size)
GPU thermal throttling starts at higher temperature
CPU thermal throttling starts at higher temperature
CPU 0 - 3 has sampling of 100 for frequency lock (as little cluster does not overheat soon)
CPU 4 & 3 has sampling of 35 for frequency lock(as these two overheats very fast)
CPU 5 & 6 off is set to at high temperature
and more CPU +battery thermal tweaks
changelogs:
2k16/12/02 -
initial tweaks published
2k16/12/19 -
-V2.0 beta
Sampling time - 50000ns core.little
Sampling time - 30000ns core.big
core.Big is power biased (partially working)
sampling down factor of core.Big is 2 (not working properly)
Can you post what changes exactly you applied?
k3lcior said:
Can you post what changes exactly you applied?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
updated OP and post #2
Can i use this on f510s MM?
tachiquan3 said:
Can i use this on f510s MM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need root to replace those files.. In MM there is no root
On the test right now. I've downgraded yesterday evening from 6.0.1 to 5.1.1. I was sick because of no root on the 6.0.1
So, a quick update: I've never used mods for thermal management before. My experience on the last 6 months were based on a stock LG G flex 2 with android 6.0.1
Right now I'm using andoid 5.1.1 with this thermal mod.
So what kind of tests do you want me to perform?
On a daily basis, and when the phone is under "stress" it will still heat up, however the CPU temp don't go above the 80ºC. This is done by this thermal management or is it done by another process?
I don't feel any lag or what so ever. Regarding games, I just play [email protected] [email protected] However I do use dual window quite often to check youtube videos on and chrome at same time, and I dind't find any issues till now.
Thanks
faagaspar said:
So, a quick update: I've never used mods for thermal management before. My experience on the last 6 months were based on a stock LG G flex 2 with android 6.0.1
Right now I'm using andoid 5.1.1 with this thermal mod.
So what kind of tests do you want me to perform?
On a daily basis, and when the phone is under "stress" it will still heat up, however the CPU temp don't go above the 80ºC. This is done by this thermal management or is it done by another process?
I don't feel any lag or what so ever. Regarding games, I just play [email protected] [email protected] However I do use dual window quite often to check youtube videos on and chrome at same time, and I dind't find any issues till now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U dont need to perform any tests.. You just have to see if these mods will get you a more stable lagfree phone with a better battery life or not..
I am bringing out a next version which has better cpu management..
Also after exams i am going to see if we can implement these tweaks into MM also .. Maybe make a dev group for MM root as v20 has made some progress...
How does your mod, without the underclocking part, compare to a combination of Probaina's thermal tweaks, Soosoolhastam's tweaked interactive governors boot script, and your own init.d scripts (also without the underclocking part)? I know it's a difficult question, but I need to know this if I'm going to install your mod. Thanks in advance~
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Iron_Overheat said:
How does your mod, without the underclocking part, compare to a combination of Probaina's thermal tweaks, Soosoolhastam's tweaked interactive governors boot script, and your own init.d scripts (also without the underclocking part)? I know it's a difficult question, but I need to know this if I'm going to install your mod. Thanks in advance~
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The interactive tweaks boost the cpu clock in many ways but all are not good for this 810chip.. Also he has directly copied and pasted the tweaks from nexus 6p without crediting the original poster ..plus it has disabled touchboost which is not present in g flex 2.. Meaning that may generate unexpected error..
Probainas tweaks was really good but i have modified stock one to not turn off cores even in heavy gaming..with probainas it heats fast and turns off cores 4 and 7 soon but mine endures longer without much heat .. Not that everyone may feel same.. But heavy gaming may lag from mine..
I have tweakd ondemand gov instead of interactive..
adds08 said:
The interactive tweaks boost the cpu clock in many ways but all are not good for this 810chip.. Also he has directly copied and pasted the tweaks from nexus 6p without crediting the original poster ..plus it has disabled touchboost which is not present in g flex 2.. Meaning that may generate unexpected error..
Probainas tweaks was really good but i have modified stock one to not turn off cores even in heavy gaming..with probainas it heats fast and turns off cores 4 and 7 soon but mine endures longer without much heat .. Not that everyone may feel same.. But heavy gaming may lag from mine..
I have tweakd ondemand gov instead of interactive..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for your response! I'll install your mod instead of the other ones, then. Cheers!
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Works very well for me, thanks Bro
PS: sry for my bad english ^^
which "init.qcom.post_boot.sh" is the correct one, the one from the zip "thermal_tweaks_021216" or the one from "coolDemand_v2.0b"? Either way, what do I edit exactly to add the mod without the underclocking part?
---------- Post added at 10:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------
I don't want to sacrifice performance in any way.
---------- Post added at 10:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 AM ----------
if you would be kind to just edit the performance compromising parts for me, it would be awesome. Otherwise, please tell me what to edit out to not compromise performance. (I will be doing lots of gaming)
---------- Post added at 10:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 AM ----------
Also, can I use your mods together with your init.d scripts (also without the underclocking part)?
Iron_Overheat said:
which "init.qcom.post_boot.sh" is the correct one, the one from the zip "thermal_tweaks_021216" or the one from "coolDemand_v2.0b"? Either way, what do I edit exactly to add the mod without the underclocking part?
---------- Post added at 10:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------
I don't want to sacrifice performance in any way.
---------- Post added at 10:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 AM ----------
if you would be kind to just edit the performance compromising parts for me, it would be awesome. Otherwise, please tell me what to edit out to not compromise performance. (I will be doing lots of gaming)
---------- Post added at 10:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 AM ----------
Also, can I use your mods together with your init.d scripts (also without the underclocking part)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the late reply..
coolDemand v2.0b is still in beta..
You can try out that but the first one thermal_tweaks_021216 is v1 which is highly stable..
Init.d scripts are something that run on boot.. so after apply the cooldemand tweak you can port init.d into it but the scripts won't be any use because it's already implemented..
So just try these.
And about the under clock part don't worry at intensely high gaming the cap will be removed anyways..
adds08 said:
Sorry for the late reply..
coolDemand v2.0b is still in beta..
You can try out that but the first one thermal_tweaks_021216 is v1 which is highly stable..
Init.d scripts are something that run on boot.. so after apply the cooldemand tweak you can port init.d into it but the scripts won't be any use because it's already implemented..
So just try these.
And about the under clock part don't worry at intensely high gaming the cap will be removed anyways..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries, but just for my perfectionism's sake, can you please tell me where to edit so that it doesn't underclock? I don't know why but I really don't want to underclock...
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Iron_Overheat said:
No worries, but just for my perfectionism's sake, can you please tell me where to edit so that it doesn't underclock? I don't know why but I really don't want to underclock...
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u want thermal tweaks.. u can download thermaltweaks 1st one and apply only the thermal-config file.
After a few days i am gonna sort everything out
adds08 said:
If u want thermal tweaks.. u can download thermaltweaks 1st one and apply only the thermal-config file.
After a few days i am gonna sort everything out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But won't that mean I'll miss out the other tweaks besides thermal ones? Like GPU compositioning, tweaked ondemand governor, etc? Can't I just delete/replace certain segments of the boot script file's text, to have all the advantages except underclocking? Sorry if this question is stupid.
Iron_Overheat said:
But won't that mean I'll miss out the other tweaks besides thermal ones? Like GPU compositioning, tweaked ondemand governor, etc? Can't I just delete/replace certain segments of the boot script file's text, to have all the advantages except underclocking? Sorry if this question is stupid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thermal file was modified to better optimize heat in this phone by me .. and is a base on other bootscript tweaks
I have discontinued this tweak and wont be work8ng on cooldemand anymore as i didnt enough feedback to progress with my work..
U can use any of this file independently..
U can just use thermal conf file if u wish with stock postboot script or anyother tweak..
Delete
Thanks mate.
How about apps like Greenify?
kevp75 said:
Thanks mate.
How about apps like Greenify?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure! I use that too but I thought it was a bit too obvious. I'll add it though
Craz Basics said:
Sure! I use that too but I thought it was a bit too obvious. I'll add it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks mate.
I'd recommend tasker as well. set with a profile for screenoff to run greenify all apps.
sometime greenify wont run on its own... with tasker it force it to run
kevp75 said:
thanks mate.
I'd recommend tasker as well. set with a profile for screenoff to run greenify all apps.
sometime greenify wont run on its own... with tasker it force it to run
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added
Craz Basics said:
Added
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may have a couple more for ya
not sure if you remember these but...
there were some fha/dha memory tweaks for the s6 build.prop about a year ago....
im testing now and so far incredible (30+ apps open with no redraws). just want to wait another day or so to verify stability
kevp75 said:
may have a couple more for ya
not sure if you remember these but...
there were some fha/dha memory tweaks for the s6 build.prop about a year ago....
im testing now and so far incredible (30+ apps open with no redraws). just want to wait another day or so to verify stability
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never had the s6, I had the HTC one m8. What's it do exaxtly?? Sounds interesting!
Craz Basics said:
I never had the s6, I had the HTC one m8. What's it do exaxtly?? Sounds interesting!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey bro.
All memory management stuff
havent tried the dha stuff... but the fha is working like a champion.
if i can remember to do it... i'll right up a flashable to delete existing dha values from build.prop and inject the fha stuff
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s6/development/research-memory-management-dha-t3132060
kevp75 said:
Hey bro.
All memory management stuff
havent tried the dha stuff... but the fha is working like a champion.
if i can remember to do it... i'll right up a flashable to delete existing dha values from build.prop and inject the fha stuff
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s6/development/research-memory-management-dha-t3132060
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotya!! I think Lspeed has some options that it looks like this is what it would change.
Craz Basics said:
Gotya!! I think Lspeed has some options that it looks like this is what it would change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to look it over. GovTuners working pretty well for me (same with the build.prop tweaks)... and I had issues with on on my lg g4...
p.s. You V4A ... primo mate so glad to have that back lololol
kevp75 said:
I'll have to look it over. GovTuners working pretty well for me (same with the build.prop tweaks)... and I had issues with on on my lg g4...
p.s. You V4A ... primo mate so glad to have that back lololol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The build prop tweaks you were making? And what did you have issues with on your g4? And, yeah!! V4A is amazing. Did you flash the zip I made or follow the guide?
Craz Basics said:
The build prop tweaks you were making? And what did you have issues with on your g4? And, yeah!! V4A is amazing. Did you flash the zip I made or follow the guide?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flashed yur zip
lspeed and govtuner seemed to conflict with each other9
did you remove govtuner? in my case I tried govtuner and the phone lagged even worse, rebooted and now I tried all the permormance profiles in ls speed and seems a little better, still of course you can see the lag some times
kevp75 said:
flashed yur zip
lspeed and govtuner seemed to conflict with each other9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotya, glad it worked! I don't use l speed anymore though, quickvic said not to use them with his root.bat
c-prodigo said:
did you remove govtuner? in my case I tried govtuner and the phone lagged even worse, rebooted and now I tried all the permormance profiles in ls speed and seems a little better, still of course you can see the lag some times
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to enable init.d. should be an option in kernel aduitor!
so, we remove ls speed, and keep kernel auditor, but just for the init.d?
---------- Post added at 03:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------
Well I did, and you were right, with just govtuner on its running much better, I will keep testing on
c-prodigo said:
so, we remove ls speed, and keep kernel auditor, but just for the init.d?
---------- Post added at 03:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------
Well I did, and you were right, with just govtuner on its running much better, I will keep testing on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet! Glad it worked. I also did the power efficient option in govtuner
Edit: dropped down performance number to 7 from 10. Gonna see if I can get better SOT.
Craz Basics said:
Sweet! Glad it worked. I also did the power efficient option in govtuner
Edit: dropped down performance number to 7 from 10. Gonna see if I can get better SOT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aye...
i only had up until 7 and on balanced.
im not a heavy user... check fb, xda, and read news most of the time ... i save the gaming for my xbox1
kevp75 said:
aye...
i only had up until 7 and on balanced.
im not a heavy user... check fb, xda, and read news most of the time ... i save the gaming for my xbox1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I play small games, nothing that would effect battery. And with performance you get to go to 10. I'm going to try power saving mode on it.
Edit: Seems to run fine with it on battery profile. I also used kernel aduitor and set the big cpu to interactive and left the little ones on conservative. I enabled apply on boot as well I'm getting a full charge to see how it is on battery!
Making a ROM - https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7...other-development/rom-crazy-rom-v1-0-t3637871
I flashed and had to flash stock because once it booted, it would randomly restart after a minute or so. So I lost all my tweaks lol. :/
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
I guess there is only one stable rom xXx
vjendra said:
I guess there is only one stable rom xXx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that one does look good, are the others buggy?
leondestiny said:
that one does look good, are the others buggy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found only xXx to be stable.
marcusrab said:
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank
marcusrab said:
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SOT varies and depends on your usage.
Xxx+cleanslate
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
charlieb620 said:
Xxx+cleanslate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any SOT info?
I know its subjective but it gives a pretty general idea of the rom\kernel combo.
Thanks!
memocatcher said:
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
memocatcher said:
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that stock options with Franco?
If I pick up my phone and use it all day in bed when I'm under the weather or when I'm home for the day with nothing to do I can get 7 hours of screen on time with constant usage at half brightness. When I am at work and have the phone with me and do a little gps etc I can get about 6 hours. It all depends on your usage and also your cell signal. The worse your signal is the faster it drains the battery. The more GPS you use the faster your battery dies. It doesn't matter which kernel I am running, (I'm currently on stock 5.1.8 with Magisk, Xposed & ElementalX) battery life is pretty much the same.
marcusrab said:
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you won't stop to believe that rom and kernel are responsible for SOT and standby drain you will never be able to 99.9 control and manage your battery usage.
it's all in user space as long as there is no know battery hog (know bug) in either rom or kernel.
before anyone is going to jump now, search and read, to help you start read this:
http://elementalx.org/the-truth-about-kernels-and-battery-life/
written by the most renown and longterm kernel developer here on xda which means at all
marcusrab said:
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
bauwoo said:
Is that stock options with Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
I get 6hrs+ SOT using stock OOS 5.1.8 + Frankenkernel.
magnamentis said:
if you won't stop to believe that rom and kernel are responsible for SOT and standby drain you will never be able to 99.9 control and manage your battery usage.
it's all in user space as long as there is no know battery hog (know bug) in either rom or kernel.
before anyone is going to jump now, search and read, to help you start read this:
http://elementalx.org/the-truth-about-kernels-and-battery-life/
written by the most renown and longterm kernel developer here on xda which means at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wait, what? I was asking if the screenshot that you posted was with Renovate and Franco... I never said I dont believe you. Or research.
Just getting clarification.
memocatcher said:
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are some great numbers! Thanks for your input and the screenshots!
memocatcher said:
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Stock /w Franco.