Just saw this on the front page and I thought maybe One X owners will want to give this a try:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1681183
Seems pretty easy to do but i'm guessing this will hurt battery life. Thoughts?
You guys already have a mod like this...kind of:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/take-control-of-your-htc-one-x-cores-with-corecontrol/
While it's not a mod per say, it's essentially the same concept: turn the cores off and on at will. The mod for the EVO LTE is simply turning on the 2nd core and leaving it on...pretty sure this gives you the same power.
I posted in vipers thread about getting it to work with the One X. I posted the file from our phone that needs to be modded for him to look at, when he gets back to me I'm going to post it over here.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
It makes exit transitions less choppy with both cores on, liking this
PoorCollegeGuy said:
You guys already have a mod like this...kind of:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/take-control-of-your-htc-one-x-cores-with-corecontrol/
While it's not a mod per say, it's essentially the same concept: turn the cores off and on at will. The mod for the EVO LTE is simply turning on the 2nd core and leaving it on...pretty sure this gives you the same power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's for the International One X..
Cryosx said:
It makes exit transitions less choppy with both cores on, liking this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you mod it yourself? its working?
---------- Post added at 06:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 AM ----------
gtung99 said:
Just saw this on the front page and I thought maybe One X owners will want to give this a try:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1681183
Seems pretty easy to do but i'm guessing this will hurt battery life. Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says some people are getting better battery life.. Definitely interested!!
nugzo said:
Did you mod it yourself? its working?
---------- Post added at 06:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 AM ----------
Says some people are getting better battery life.. Definitely interested!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just added that one line and changed the permissions in that other line. Battery life while playing music was terrible so I reverted back.
Cryosx said:
Just added that one line and changed the permissions in that other line. Battery life while playing music was terrible so I reverted back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i looked in to it but was confused. Original OP said he added two lines. When i searched it i found like 3 instances of the same line so i was unsure about just changing something, didnt think that would work... but i have no expertise to base it on, just assumption.
Check the DEV section. This has been ported over.
Related
Possible to disable second core to save more battery life? I noticed whenever I pulldown the notification bar my second core goes straight to 100% use so I wonder if I disable it I could save battery.
SkyICS 7.4 rom
Faux 10u kernel
Underclocked 1.02ghz, UV -100
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
You have to adjust the ratio of the fluxcapicator . To do that
silver03wrx said:
You have to adjust the ratio of the fluxcapicator . To do that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol don't listen to this guy. I believe faux hss by default set 2nd core to offline, and it only turns on under load. which app are using to monitor cpu usage
Here read this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1329585
Would actually cause qorse battery life.
---------- Post added at 06:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:14 PM ----------
Yes i know thata a diff device but same principal
Yeah, I notice when not touching the screen the second core is put offline, and I would use fauxclock to see that, but I gave up with that and use system tuner now, also shows second core offline but as soon as I bring the notification bar down just a bit, it comes out of it's offline state and that isn't even a 'serious load' occasion so I'd like to just keep it offline
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
silver03wrx said:
Here read this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1329585
Would actually cause qorse battery life.
---------- Post added at 06:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:14 PM ----------
Yes i know thata a diff device but same principal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've seen that post before, but I have a lot of experience I. The technical field and I know as a fact the processor draws more power to use both cores instead of just one
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
Suposidly the second core only gets used when needed. If your phone was put under the same load with no second core to pick up some of the duty then you are drawing more electricity anyway. 1 core running at twice the load vs 2 cpres runing at half the load. No one knows unless u have a digital multimeter and can test yourself
silver03wrx said:
Suposidly the second core only gets used when needed. If your phone was put under the same load with no second core to pick up some of the duty then you are drawing more electricity anyway. 1 core running at twice the load vs 2 cpres runing at half the load. No one knows unless u have a digital multimeter and can test yourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haz multimeter also I help manage the military network for my state and have plenty of knowledge on the hardware end leave the second core be it will only use what it needs bro your gonna work the processor in ways it wasn't meant to be worked. But if you don't trust faux who's made some 16 kernels then have you used the disable second core option or was that something you tried
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
nrm5110 said:
I haz multimeter also I help manage the military network for my state and have plenty of knowledge on the hardware end leave the second core be it will only use what it needs bro your gonna work the processor in ways it wasn't meant to be worked. But if you don't trust faux who's made some 16 kernels then have you used the disable second core option or was that something you tried
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i'm looking to totally disable it, as the tasks my phone handles on a daily basis does not require a second core. The hardest tasks it'll complete all day is opening up the messaging apparently which is instant even at 328mhz.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
I have to be honest. Why buy an android phone with an S3 dual core processor then? That's defeatist. If your simply using the phone for basic messaging, maybe some email and youtube, a windows phone would have been better suited. Mango 7.5 is very stable, and it runs on all single cores
Has anyone tried this combination?
Stock rooted, PBJ kernel and the FP1 new modem
If so...any issues I may ned to be aware of before attempting?
PM me or reply here
Cheers,
M_T_M said:
Has anyone tried this combination?
Stock rooted, PBJ kernel and the FP1 new modem
If so...any issues I may ned to be aware of before attempting?
PM me or reply here
Cheers,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any issue here. Go for it
EDIT; as long as you don't mix FP1 rom and custom kernel (will have wifi issue).
buhohitr said:
I don't see any issue here. Go for it
EDIT; as long as you don't mix FP1 rom and custom kernel (will have wifi issue).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that what you are using? I mean, that same combo?
Radio only works fine. I ran it a couple of days before I went full FP1. Like buhohitr said, the only issue is mixing FP1 rom with EP4 kernel. If you are running an FP1 rom with an EP4 kernel, you aren't going to have wifi.
shrike1978 said:
Radio only works fine. I ran it a couple of days before I went full FP1. Like buhohitr said, the only issue is mixing FP1 rom with EP4 kernel. If you are running an FP1 rom with an EP4 kernel, you aren't going to have wifi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read that part about the wifi just concerned about the combination I would have after flashing the new modem.
I'm hoping to get better battery life with this set up...the eternal search for that unicornial dream
Fp1 ROM with custom kernel = broken Wifi
Fp1 ROM with Fp1 kernel = working Wifi
Modem wont affect any setup, just the kernel.
Sent from my Droid Charge
Follow me on twitter @lmrtech
Update:
I ODIN the new CWR (blue one) and flashed the radio..interestingly it took longer that I anticipated, don't know why
Phone is rebooting and off to test it for a couple of days.
I will post my finding here tomorrow or as soon as I notice something interesting happening.
Thanks mates for all your help and support
This is what XDA is really all about
Regards,
M_T_M
M_T_M said:
Update:
I ODIN the new CWR (blue one) and flashed the radio..interestingly it took longer that I anticipated, don't know why
Phone is rebooting and off to test it for a couple of days.
I will post my finding here tomorrow or as soon as I notice something interesting happening.
Thanks mates for all your help and support
This is what XDA is really all about
Regards,
M_T_M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"interestingly it took longer that I anticipated". It's normal, this zip has to update your current radio. Took awhile on mine too. If you wipe cache or davik cache, it even took longer, but you're fine.
buhohitr said:
"interestingly it took longer that I anticipated". It's normal, this zip has to update your current radio. Took awhile on mine too. If you wipe cache or davik cache, it even took longer, but you're fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did wipe davik and by me saying that it took longer than anticipated I'm trying to describe the process so newbies won't freak out and open threads with: "Oh noes, bar haz no progrezz..halp nao!!"
M_T_M said:
I did wipe davik and by me saying that it took longer than anticipated I'm trying to describe the process so newbies won't freak out and open threads with: "Oh noes, bar haz no progrezz..halp nao!!"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha, this can be quote of the day:
"Oh noes, bar haz no progrezz..halp nao!!"
buhohitr said:
Hahaha, this can be quote of the day:
"Oh noes, bar haz no progrezz..halp nao!!"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seen them before mate....too many times before
glad I made you giggle
Update:
good so far...battery life improvement of 15% I guess
Happy so far
Thanks to everybody for your replies
M_T_M said:
Update:
good so far...battery life improvement of 15% I guess
Happy so far
Thanks to everybody for your replies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So wifi does not work to access the network (as network client). Does it still work as an access point running wifi tethering (ad-hoc with ver 2.0.8 or structure with ver 3.1.11)?
Ted A said:
So wifi does not work to access the network (as network client). Does it still work as an access point running wifi tethering (ad-hoc with ver 2.0.8 or structure with ver 3.1.11)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard some reports that Wifi tethering should be working fine,(using 4G of course).
---------- Post added at 03:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:34 PM ----------
M_T_M said:
Update:
good so far...battery life improvement of 15% I guess
Happy so far
Thanks to everybody for your replies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pop in a good battery saver app, you can easily get 30% or more!
Which one?
buhohitr said:
I heard some reports that Wifi tethering should be working fine,(using 4G of course).
---------- Post added at 03:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:34 PM ----------
Pop in a good battery saver app, you can easily get 30% or more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pfft...my signature is better than yours
buhohitr said:
I heard some reports that Wifi tethering should be working fine,(using 4G of course).
---------- Post added at 03:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:34 PM ----------
Pop in a good battery saver app, you can easily get 30% or more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To tell you the truth, battery life isn't much of a concern now that I'm running with an extended battery that easily gives me 25-28 hours of runtime under normal usage, full-time 4G and screen brightness locked in at 30%...
Ted A said:
To tell you the truth, battery life isn't much of a concern now that I'm running with an extended battery that easily gives me 25-28 hours of runtime under normal usage, full-time 4G and screen brightness locked in at 30%...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very Truth! just don't forget to charge and bring the spare with you )
M_T_M said:
Which one?
Pfft...my signature is better than yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry missed your post. I have been testing the best three: Battery defender, battery saver and Go power master...and the best is....Battery defender. Make sure you have full charge(100%), then install Battery defender, use it until drop below 10%, plug in and charge straight up to 100% (do not unplug before 100%), do this 3 times and you will see the results. After the third time, you can charge/unplug anytime you want. The second best is battery saver.
buhohitr said:
Sorry missed your post. I have been testing the best three: Battery defender, battery saver and Go power master...and the best is....Battery defender. Make sure you have full charge(100%), then install Battery defender, use it until drop below 10%, plug in and charge straight up to 100% (do not unplug before 100%), do this 3 times and you will see the results. After the third time, you can charge/unplug anytime you want. The second best is battery saver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I had a G3 previously and there was an app I used that would overclock the gpu or something for better framerate overall on the phone but I can find it any ware now. It was a small app that would let you select from a rate of something like 440000 to 660000. If I went to high the screen would go blue and I'd have to reboot. Any one remember what it was called?
gigamchz said:
I had a G3 previously and there was an app I used that would overclock the gpu or something for better framerate overall on the phone but I can find it any ware now. It was a small app that would let you select from a rate of something like 440000 to 660000. If I went to high the screen would go blue and I'd have to reboot. Any one remember what it was called?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its velocity. And g3 speed tweak
★2SHAYNEZ★
shayneflashindaily said:
Its velocity. And g3 speed tweak
★2SHAYNEZ★
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have links to the downloads possibly? Or are they xposed modules?
shayneflashindaily said:
Its velocity. And g3 speed tweak
★2SHAYNEZ★
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think these were what I was looking for.
I've been googling LG speed tweak for a few hours and can't find any kind of apk or anything.
It is what your talking about..... I'll link you hold on... Its really not hard to find man
★2SHAYNEZ★
---------- Post added at 11:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 PM ----------
If you would have googled (g3 speed tweak velocity) it would have been the first link....... Anyways here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/tmobile-lg-g3/development/script-g3-speed-t2929215
★2SHAYNEZ★
Awesome! Seems the app has been developed a bit more since I last found it. I do apologize for my apparent lack of googling skills. "Didn't take me skill at all, you're just stupid." There, I said it for you.
Delete
Thanks mate.
How about apps like Greenify?
kevp75 said:
Thanks mate.
How about apps like Greenify?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure! I use that too but I thought it was a bit too obvious. I'll add it though
Craz Basics said:
Sure! I use that too but I thought it was a bit too obvious. I'll add it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks mate.
I'd recommend tasker as well. set with a profile for screenoff to run greenify all apps.
sometime greenify wont run on its own... with tasker it force it to run
kevp75 said:
thanks mate.
I'd recommend tasker as well. set with a profile for screenoff to run greenify all apps.
sometime greenify wont run on its own... with tasker it force it to run
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added
Craz Basics said:
Added
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may have a couple more for ya
not sure if you remember these but...
there were some fha/dha memory tweaks for the s6 build.prop about a year ago....
im testing now and so far incredible (30+ apps open with no redraws). just want to wait another day or so to verify stability
kevp75 said:
may have a couple more for ya
not sure if you remember these but...
there were some fha/dha memory tweaks for the s6 build.prop about a year ago....
im testing now and so far incredible (30+ apps open with no redraws). just want to wait another day or so to verify stability
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never had the s6, I had the HTC one m8. What's it do exaxtly?? Sounds interesting!
Craz Basics said:
I never had the s6, I had the HTC one m8. What's it do exaxtly?? Sounds interesting!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey bro.
All memory management stuff
havent tried the dha stuff... but the fha is working like a champion.
if i can remember to do it... i'll right up a flashable to delete existing dha values from build.prop and inject the fha stuff
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s6/development/research-memory-management-dha-t3132060
kevp75 said:
Hey bro.
All memory management stuff
havent tried the dha stuff... but the fha is working like a champion.
if i can remember to do it... i'll right up a flashable to delete existing dha values from build.prop and inject the fha stuff
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s6/development/research-memory-management-dha-t3132060
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotya!! I think Lspeed has some options that it looks like this is what it would change.
Craz Basics said:
Gotya!! I think Lspeed has some options that it looks like this is what it would change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to look it over. GovTuners working pretty well for me (same with the build.prop tweaks)... and I had issues with on on my lg g4...
p.s. You V4A ... primo mate so glad to have that back lololol
kevp75 said:
I'll have to look it over. GovTuners working pretty well for me (same with the build.prop tweaks)... and I had issues with on on my lg g4...
p.s. You V4A ... primo mate so glad to have that back lololol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The build prop tweaks you were making? And what did you have issues with on your g4? And, yeah!! V4A is amazing. Did you flash the zip I made or follow the guide?
Craz Basics said:
The build prop tweaks you were making? And what did you have issues with on your g4? And, yeah!! V4A is amazing. Did you flash the zip I made or follow the guide?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flashed yur zip
lspeed and govtuner seemed to conflict with each other9
did you remove govtuner? in my case I tried govtuner and the phone lagged even worse, rebooted and now I tried all the permormance profiles in ls speed and seems a little better, still of course you can see the lag some times
kevp75 said:
flashed yur zip
lspeed and govtuner seemed to conflict with each other9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotya, glad it worked! I don't use l speed anymore though, quickvic said not to use them with his root.bat
c-prodigo said:
did you remove govtuner? in my case I tried govtuner and the phone lagged even worse, rebooted and now I tried all the permormance profiles in ls speed and seems a little better, still of course you can see the lag some times
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to enable init.d. should be an option in kernel aduitor!
so, we remove ls speed, and keep kernel auditor, but just for the init.d?
---------- Post added at 03:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------
Well I did, and you were right, with just govtuner on its running much better, I will keep testing on
c-prodigo said:
so, we remove ls speed, and keep kernel auditor, but just for the init.d?
---------- Post added at 03:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:36 PM ----------
Well I did, and you were right, with just govtuner on its running much better, I will keep testing on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet! Glad it worked. I also did the power efficient option in govtuner
Edit: dropped down performance number to 7 from 10. Gonna see if I can get better SOT.
Craz Basics said:
Sweet! Glad it worked. I also did the power efficient option in govtuner
Edit: dropped down performance number to 7 from 10. Gonna see if I can get better SOT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aye...
i only had up until 7 and on balanced.
im not a heavy user... check fb, xda, and read news most of the time ... i save the gaming for my xbox1
kevp75 said:
aye...
i only had up until 7 and on balanced.
im not a heavy user... check fb, xda, and read news most of the time ... i save the gaming for my xbox1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I play small games, nothing that would effect battery. And with performance you get to go to 10. I'm going to try power saving mode on it.
Edit: Seems to run fine with it on battery profile. I also used kernel aduitor and set the big cpu to interactive and left the little ones on conservative. I enabled apply on boot as well I'm getting a full charge to see how it is on battery!
Making a ROM - https://forum.xda-developers.com/s7...other-development/rom-crazy-rom-v1-0-t3637871
I flashed and had to flash stock because once it booted, it would randomly restart after a minute or so. So I lost all my tweaks lol. :/
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
I guess there is only one stable rom xXx
vjendra said:
I guess there is only one stable rom xXx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that one does look good, are the others buggy?
leondestiny said:
that one does look good, are the others buggy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found only xXx to be stable.
marcusrab said:
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank
marcusrab said:
Hey guys … we've had quite a bit of development in a very short amount of time since release. There are some very talented developers out there and a dedicated number of people making our already great phone even better.
So, I was curious to see at this point what Rom\Kernel Combo everybody is running to get the most out of the battery while maintaining performance!
Sound off on which rom\kernel combo you're using and post battery life screenshots if you have them!
Thank you to the developers that make this happen, we couldn't have gotten here without you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SOT varies and depends on your usage.
Xxx+cleanslate
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
charlieb620 said:
Xxx+cleanslate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any SOT info?
I know its subjective but it gives a pretty general idea of the rom\kernel combo.
Thanks!
memocatcher said:
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
memocatcher said:
If you want a balanced kernel with a really good battery life, you should go with franco kernel. I achieved very good stand by and screen on time, even on the currently battrry-buggy OxygenOS 5.1.8. And if you want a light customizable ROM with quiet a few goodies, go with Renovate 3.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that stock options with Franco?
If I pick up my phone and use it all day in bed when I'm under the weather or when I'm home for the day with nothing to do I can get 7 hours of screen on time with constant usage at half brightness. When I am at work and have the phone with me and do a little gps etc I can get about 6 hours. It all depends on your usage and also your cell signal. The worse your signal is the faster it drains the battery. The more GPS you use the faster your battery dies. It doesn't matter which kernel I am running, (I'm currently on stock 5.1.8 with Magisk, Xposed & ElementalX) battery life is pretty much the same.
marcusrab said:
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you won't stop to believe that rom and kernel are responsible for SOT and standby drain you will never be able to 99.9 control and manage your battery usage.
it's all in user space as long as there is no know battery hog (know bug) in either rom or kernel.
before anyone is going to jump now, search and read, to help you start read this:
http://elementalx.org/the-truth-about-kernels-and-battery-life/
written by the most renown and longterm kernel developer here on xda which means at all
marcusrab said:
That's really good SOT!
Is that what that screenshot comes from? Renovate 3.2 + Franco ?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
bauwoo said:
Is that stock options with Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
I get 6hrs+ SOT using stock OOS 5.1.8 + Frankenkernel.
magnamentis said:
if you won't stop to believe that rom and kernel are responsible for SOT and standby drain you will never be able to 99.9 control and manage your battery usage.
it's all in user space as long as there is no know battery hog (know bug) in either rom or kernel.
before anyone is going to jump now, search and read, to help you start read this:
http://elementalx.org/the-truth-about-kernels-and-battery-life/
written by the most renown and longterm kernel developer here on xda which means at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wait, what? I was asking if the screenshot that you posted was with Renovate and Franco... I never said I dont believe you. Or research.
Just getting clarification.
memocatcher said:
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are some great numbers! Thanks for your input and the screenshots!
memocatcher said:
Yes. My current set up
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
I underclocked the cpu by 25%. (Doesn't have a effect on performance as fas as I see)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Stock /w Franco.