hi guys
this is my first thread
Do appreciate your response
if you all like it let me know i will post more wallpapers
Thanx
WVGA wallpapers is always welcome, but i think this set was a little too girlie for me ;-)
Mohitt said:
hi guys
this is my first thread
Do appreciate your response
if you all like it let me know i will post more wallpapers
Thanx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing. Welcome to the forum btw
Are they 400 or 480 x800?
they are 800 in height and 400 in width
Mmmm...
Mohitt said:
they are 800 in height and 400 in width
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WVGA is 480x800, not 400x800 - Thanks for sharing anyway
thanks very much
if u all like my post pls give it some stars
will be posting new sunset,skys and forest wallpaers very soon
i think max by 21
I think you would get more attention if they were 480 X 800 not 400 X 800. WTH is 400 X 800
400x800 is WQVGA I think..
My Omnia uses that size
(so does my Pioneer AVIC)
Sorry but this pack is not very good. For one the resolution is off for this perticular unit and second the images included are resized verisions of 600x800 (or larger) images where aspect is distorted. If you absolutely must have a certain image you should atleast crop the image to maintain aspect ratio before resizeing.
Never the less, thanks for the effort and good luck on future projects.
bryan95502 said:
400x800 is WQVGA I think..
My Omnia uses that size
(so does my Pioneer AVIC)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WQGVA is 240 X 400??????
Just to clarify: ;
The ratio of the width of the display to the height of the display eg VGA 640 x 480 in a 4:3 format (480 x 4/3 = 640).
Topaz is WVGA = 480x800 (WVGA is just a "Wide" VGA, therefore the 480 remains the constant)
VGA = 480x640
QVGA = 240X320 (Quarter)
WQVGA = 240x320+ (Wide Quarter VGA)
SVGA = 600x800 (Super)
EVGA = 768x1024 (Extended)
So, 400x800 is a variatant of VGA in 2:1 format, but technically there is no acronym for it.
I hope those wallpaper are suitable for me.
As I promised
Here are some sunset or u can say some landscapes wallpaper
Not sure of exat resolution as they have been cropped to get best view
I m am Sure they will pretty good on your QVga/Wvga phones aka diamond and daimond 2
I have all on my htc pure
they are abt 36 in no.
Also this time including some screenshots
so u dont waste ur bandwidht and time if they r not of ur taste
how do u set that all the tabs in the touch flo 3d have a background, now only my home screen has a background and the rest (like apps or images) dont have no background
Thanks a lot.
Download the "BG_for_all_pages_WVGA tool", and you can have same background for all the tabs.
thank you for sharing
thanks very much for sharing
Thanks a lot,have a look.
i understand the screen resolution is 1280 x 800 but does anyone know what size wallpapers need to be. they are larger than screen resolution to provide mulitple screens sliding. thanks
note: i believe they need to be 1280 x 1600 (horizontal - vertical) for scrolling wallpapers.
and of course 800 x 1280 - if you use disable wallpaper scrolling.
Live Wallpaper
Phone not support live wallpaper?
Tried 3 different, all worked fine.
sent from my Galaxy Note via T*patalk
ist nice
bedspringlex said:
i understand the screen resolution is 1280 x 800 but does anyone know what size wallpapers need to be. they are larger than screen resolution to provide mulitple screens sliding. thanks
note: i believe they need to be 1280 x 1600 (horizontal - vertical) for scrolling wallpapers.
and of course 800 x 1280 - if you use disable wallpaper scrolling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any wallpaper with resolution of 1280 x 1280 is best for note (without scrolling)..
if i watch a 1080 p video would the desire s get all the pixels are will it only use 480p or the800p. what would be the differnce between 720 p and 1080pvid.thanks for all answers.
Sent from my MildWild for Desire using XDA
720p video resolution: 1280x720.
1080p video resolution: 1920x1080.
Desire S' screen resolution: 800x480 (horizontally).
Meaning: anything above 800x480 is a waste of pixels that you won't see, and extra load on the CPU that will need to resample it to 800x480 on the fly.
Since Google won't update the awful stock camera app and the quality of the pictures taken with the third party apps on the play store is garbage.
I will crop my pictures using a Photoshop Script until we get a new app or I get the HTC One+/ One 2014 , to which size should I crop my pictures to get the maximum resolution posible of photos taken with HDR+ on?
The Nexus 5 camera takes pictures with 3264x2448 and when you use HDR+ it takes slightly smaller pictures (3200x2368) native 8 MP cameras take pictures with 3008 x 2000 resolution, would it be ok if i just chop 368 pixels horizontally and 192 vertically?
Chad_Petree said:
Since Google won't update the awful stock camera app and the quality of the pictures taken with the third party apps on the play store is garbage, I will crop my pictures using a Photoshop Script until we get a new app or I get the HTC One+/ One 2014 , to which size should I crop my pictures to get the maximum resolution posible of photos taken with HDR+ on? The Nexus 5 camera takes pictures with 3264x2448 and when you use HDR+ it takes slightly smaller pictures (3200x2368) native 8 MP cameras take pictures with 3008 x 2000 resolution, using my 3200x2368 pictures and cropping them to 3008 x 2000 won't slightly distort the picture?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cropping CUTS the image. It doesn't SQUISH it so no distortion is possible. You just wont be able to see parts of the photo you crop off.
Anyway, to get a 16:9 aspect ratio from a width of 3264, You would need to crop to a height of 1836.
4:3 means for every 4 pixels across the screen, it goes 3 pixels up the side of the screen. So if 3264 is the 4 across (3264 / 4 = 816 for each 1) then 816 * 3 = 2448
16:9 for every 16 pixels across, it goes 9 pixels up. So if 3264 is the 9 across (3264 / 16 = 204 for each 1) then 204 * 9 = 1836
Or in otherwords
Resolution is always WidthxHeight
Aspect ratio is always Width:Height
Take Resolution Width and divide it by Aspect Ratio Width to get a multiplier. Multiply the multiplier by the Aspect Ratio Height to get the resolution height.
rootSU said:
Cropping CUTS the image. It doesn't SQUISH it so no distortion is possible. You just wont be able to see parts of the photo you crop off.
Anyway, to get a 16:9 aspect ratio from a width of 3264, You would need to crop to a height of 1836.
4:3 means for every 4 pixels across the screen, it goes 3 pixels up the side of the screen. So if 3264 is the 4 across (3264 / 4 = 816 for each 1) then 816 * 3 = 2448
16:9 for every 16 pixels across, it goes 9 pixels up. So if 3264 is the 9 across (3264 / 16 = 204 for each 1) then 204 * 9 = 1836
Or in otherwords
Resolution is always WidthxHeight
Aspect ratio is always Width:Height
Take Resolution Width and divide it by Aspect Ratio Width to get a multiplier. Multiply the multiplier by the Aspect Ratio Height to get the resolution height.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had to re read what you posted hahaha :'( , but I do what aspect ratio refers to, yes silly me, the picture won't be distorted, because I'm just chopping a piece of it, what I should have asked is wether cutting it to 3008 x 2000 will give me a true 16:9 aspect ratio, I cropped a HDR+ picture (3200x2168) and I got a 3200x1800 picture
Chad_Petree said:
Had to re read what you posted hahaha :'( , but I do what aspect ratio refers to, yes silly me, the picture won't be distorted, because I'm just chopping a piece of it, what I should have asked is wether cutting it to 3008 x 2000 will give me a true 16:9 aspect ratio, I cropped a HDR+ picture (3200x2168) and I got a 3200x1800 picture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you choose to crop to 3200 width? Are you using an app with presets?
3200 x 1800
16 : 9
3200 / 16 = 200
200 * 9 = 1800
So yes
OR
3200/16 = 200
1800/9=200
So yes
.
rootSU said:
Why would you choose to crop to 3200 width? Are you using an app with presets?
3200 x 1800
16 : 9
3200 / 16 = 200
200 * 9 = 1800
So yes
OR
3200/16 = 200
1800/9=200
So yes
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm using the Photoshop presets for 16:9 , why is it a different size than the size you're talking about ?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Chad_Petree said:
Yes I'm using the Photoshop presets for 16:9 , why is it a different size than the size you're talking about ?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok well I can confirm, that preset is 16:9 but you're also losing some width of the photo there too. The number in my earlier response is based on the maximum width of image produced by the N5 sensor. The optimum 16:9 resolution for an image taken from the Nexus 5 is 3264x1836, however your preset isn't much smaller so its a non-issue I suppose.
Of course for anyone else reading ( @Chad_Petree knows this) it will still only display as 2mpx 1920x1080 on a HD display. A higher resolution can only be achieved on a higher than HD resolution screen or printing to poster size.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I believe the 3200 width comes from the HDR+ photos hes taking. The pictures are reduced in size presumably to better stitch the multiple images together.
rootSU said:
Of course for anyone else reading ( @Chad_Petree knows this) it will still only display as 2mpx 1920x1080 on a HD display. A higher resolution can only be achieved on a higher than HD resolution screen or printing to poster size.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, by the way I'll reserve judgment until I see them, maybe they will blow me away, but all this talk about 2k screens on phones, I think it's innecesary, putting more strain on the battery, just give me a damn phone that last 24 hours with heavy use, a normal sized phone not a phablet
bblzd said:
I believe the 3200 width comes from the HDR+ photos hes taking. The pictures are reduced in size presumably to better stitch the multiple images together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like a plausible explanation, the photos taken with HDR+ are indeed a bit tinier
bblzd said:
I believe the 3200 width comes from the HDR+ photos hes taking. The pictures are reduced in size presumably to better stitch the multiple images together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes you're right
---------- Post added at 10:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 AM ----------
Chad_Petree said:
Yes, by the way I'll reserve judgment until I see them, maybe they will blow me away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They won't. It is impossible for there to be any visual improvement between a 2mpx image and a 6mpx image on a 2mpx screen. In fact, since the 6mpx image has to be condensed into 2mpx, it is even possible that a 2mpx image will look better than a 6mpx image.
The only time you will get blown away with more than 2mpx is if:
1) You have a screen with more than 2mpx (4k for example)
2) You're printing the image in an enlarged format
rootSU said:
yes you're right
---------- Post added at 10:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 AM ----------
They won't. It is impossible for there to be any visual improvement between a 2mpx image and a 6mpx image on a 2mpx screen. In fact, since the 6mpx image has to be condensed into 2mpx, it is even possible that a 2mpx image will look better than a 6mpx image.
The only time you will get blown away with more than 2mpx is if:
1) You have a screen with more than 2mpx (4k for example)
2) You're printing the image in an enlarged format
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was talking about 2k screens, not 2k videos on our 1080p screens, don't forget that when 1080p screens were announced we were quick to say they were gimmicks, but look how much better they look, and yes I realise that it probably has to do more with the fact that they come with new technologies and the resolution is not the main reason why they look better
Chad_Petree said:
I was talking about 2k screens, not 2k videos on our 1080p screens, don't forget that when 1080p screens were announced we were quick to say they were gimmicks, but look how much better they look, and yes I realise that it probably has to do more with the fact that they come with new technologies and the resolution is not the main reason why they look better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not saying that they're a gimmick. 4k screens will become prevalent in the future. 2k seems like a pointless step to me though.
Watching a 1080 video on a 720 screen looks no better (in fact worse) than watching a 720 video on a 720 screen. The trick is, display whatever you are displaying at the native resolution for best results
...and yes, a 6mpx photo will look better than a 2mpx photo on a 2k screen. The 6mpx image will need to be condensed to fit but the 2mpx picture is a lower resolution so it will either need to be upscaled or simply not fill the screen.
However 1080 screens are 2mpx so a 2mpx photo will always look better than a 6mpx photo on the same screen because it is the native resolution of the image and screen.
So as long as you have nothing over and above 1080, a 6mpx image is pointless. That said, I prefer as full a resolution as I can get for future proofing.
wondering if it possible to increase the resolution of picture captured in motion shot, default i think is 1280 x 720 if i remember as highest .... any thoughts?
infra4800 said:
wondering if it possible to increase the resolution of picture captured in motion shot, default i think is 1280 x 720 if i remember as highest .... any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at the moment, maybe once the phone is rooted and people start to tweak the camera settings