Related
Hi,
Is the above possible? I found some guides for CYM but none for our phone...
any advice would be highly appreciated
10x
Alon
They aren't finished building cm for our phones yet... They are working on it though. Add for
an emulator, I asked that question a long time ago and I was told since there are so many Android devices and each one is different it would be useless for the manufacturer to build an emulator... The only way we could have one for our phone is to build it ourselves... Which would required a butt load of time and knowledge of many different things like Java, Linux, kernel building, scripting, etc...
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
thomas.raines said:
They aren't finished building cm for our phones yet... They are working on it though. Add for
an emulator, I asked that question a long time ago and I was told since there are so many Android devices and each one is different it would be useless for the manufacturer to build an emulator... The only way we could have one for our phone is to build it ourselves... Which would required a butt load of time and knowledge of many different things like Java, Linux, kernel building, scripting, etc...
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so currently there is no way we can test our ROMs on emulator?
alon2 said:
so currently there is no way we can test our ROMs on emulator?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can try to build the samsung sources against the aosp source code. The AOSP source code comes with the android emulator pre-compiled so you can test out your roms.
FBis251 said:
Well you can try to build the samsung sources against the aosp source code. The AOSP source code comes with the android emulator pre-compiled so you can test out your roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you please elaborate on this one?I'm not sure I followed
alon2 said:
can you please elaborate on this one?I'm not sure I followed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://source.android.com/source/building.html
FBis251 said:
http://source.android.com/source/building.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK...I'll see what I can understand from that
10x
Hi guys im new to XDA but not new to Android development i used to have Cricket service (which sucked) and signed with T-Mobile and got this phone for free After spending all week reading all these threads i can say im one of the lucky ones since i got the good chip and good screen and rooted my phone and im running Sysnthetic_Aospx great rom btw. Any other good roms that i should try? Anywho im rooted and this isnt another "which rom is better" im actually a developer and i want to get my hands dirty and try and compile kernels any guides out there for me to start compiling and building my kernel environment?
I know my way around developing roms and wanted to know what developers develop for this device im willing to give you guys a hand if u need it or just be a tester.
Btw my name is Mr. Iffy ill try to help when i can hopefully one of the devs can help me with an Ice cream kernel to develop for this device. If someone can also tell me what devs are here i only see like 4 of them Synthetic and elginsk8r and awesome and cnote. Thanks guys hopefully i can be more of help around here.
Welcome! It's great to have another dev among us. Unfortunately, we have lost many of our devs to other devices, but a few talented ones remain. Hopefully you and the remaining devs will be able to bring a fully functional ICS Sense ROM to our little community.
Again, welcome!
4Orr said:
Welcome! It's great to have another dev among us. Unfortunately, we have lost many of our devs to other devices, but a few talented ones remain. Hopefully you and the remaining devs will be able to bring a fully functional ICS Sense ROM to our little community.
Again, welcome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, i hope so too i sent a private message to elgins8r and synthetic hopefully they can help me build a kernel.
Welcome to the party, what do you know about building kernels?
THEindian said:
Welcome to the party, what do you know about building kernels?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing really but is willing to learn if u give me the terminal code to compile the kernel environment I know my way around
Sent from my ROOTIE TOOTIE FRESH 'N FRUITY GLACIER
Hey welcome, we have a developer among us!
You know how to compile and port ROMs?
Sent from my Streak7 Honeycomb using xda premium
Yes I know how to port, build cyanogen roms from source not ics yet that's still new to me but I want to learn to compile kernels and such
Mr. Iffy said:
Yes I know how to port, build cyanogen roms from source not ics yet that's still new to me but I want to learn to compile kernels and such
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernels are difficult, i dont really know enoguh to teach you but there are plenty of guides. It tooks me 3 hours to compile 10% of a kernel and the process failed due to one of the files. We should collarborate.
THEindian said:
Kernels are difficult, i dont really know enoguh to teach you but there are plenty of guides. It tooks me 3 hours to compile 10% of a kernel and the process failed due to one of the files. We should collarborate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely can u post which guide u followed
Look forward to your work
Devs wise, there is a few, like the ones you listed. You also have my; Team Inferno an another team call AndroidInsomnia (killer miui builds).
How do I build my own Nexus S kernel?
I cloned the samsung.git at source.android.com
Do I need to download the kernel source tarball at www,kernel.org as well ? or is this not needed ?
What if I want to build a kernel like AIR Kernel ?
I only would like to make a few adjustments and add a few things.
If you need yo ask how to build a kernel, you shouldn't build one in first place.
Sent from my galaxy using xda premium
djjonastybe said:
How do I build my own Nexus S kernel?
I cloned the samsung.git at source.android.com
Do I need to download the kernel source tarball at www,kernel.org as well ? or is this not needed ?
What if I want to build a kernel like AIR Kernel ?
I only would like to make a few adjustments and add a few things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sorry, but this is not the appropriate forum for this kind of questions. Search around XDA, there are tons of tutorials about kernel development.
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m
inFECT2 said:
If you need yo ask how to build a kernel, you shouldn't build one in first place.
Sent from my galaxy using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
False. A couple of years ago I wanted to overclock my phone more but at the time no one would release a kernel with that extra step. I knew zero linux, but through lots of reading, and support from XDA I was able to install a linux distro, setup the environment, modify the kernel as I wanted and compiled. I cracked the top 10 with that kernel in that benchmark everyone was using back then. Anyway, it was a very rewarding experience but took quite a bit of patience and a few trips to IRC.
I used this as one of my resources: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Building_Kernel_from_source
Good luck!
irishrally said:
False. A couple of years ago I wanted to overclock my phone more but at the time no one would release a kernel with that extra step. I knew zero linux, but through lots of reading, and support from XDA I was able to install a linux distro, setup the environment, modify the kernel as I wanted and compiled. I cracked the top 10 with that kernel in that benchmark everyone was using back then. Anyway, it was a very rewarding experience but took quite a bit of patience and a few trips to IRC.
I used this as one of my resources: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Building_Kernel_from_source
Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course its all about reading manuals, howtos, tuts etc.. i remember my first grsec kernel. locked myself out of the system *facepalm* anyways, i didnt mean to be rude, just stating the obvious. The OP sounds like he didnt made the basic research, thats why i said what i said. Maybe iam wrong, maybe not!
Whatever, the provided links should give him a good start. Also, searching for kernel howtos via xda search enginge helps a lot too.
I did do some basic research. I have compiled a kernel before. But that was about 1 year ago. But everything is saying something different.
Every tutorial is different somehow. Some look even outdated.
I mainly want to do some tests with bus speeds and cpu frequencies. And I want to do some tests with live_oc modifying its source code. But I need a base to start.
$ export ARCH=arm
$ export SUBARCH=arm
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
$ cd omap
$ git checkout <commit_from_first_step>
$ make panda_defconfig
$ make
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it looks like there is a mistake on the source.android.com tutorial.
Shouldn't that be
$ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-4.4.3
or am i mistaken
http://source.android.com/source/building-kernels.html
$ git checkout <commit_from_first_step>
What do I do with this ??? I tried various things nothing is working. I think it's the last thing holding me back.
I have no files in my samsung folder. They are all hidden :/ They are downloaded but hidden.
this is just a demo of a kernel based on quarx 3.0.8 kernel sources,maybe later i'll try to merge several fixes or something but till then lets say i've reached a small milestone like finishing to compile this kernel,booting it up,take some screenshots from it.
known bugs,just like initial quarxs or blenchose commits.
Warning:flash at your own responsability,works only with cm 10.1 under boot options by ticking 2ndboot and ticking adb disable
link to kernel:http://www.mediafire.com/?vdjoj438tlvz2lw
NOTE:kernel sources are based on quarx repo on github:https://github.com/Quarx2k/jordan-kernel
What's this? A fix for CM10.1 23/01?
I think it's a 3.0 kernel... so not a fix.
i think , quarx2k also made many changes with his CM 10.1-3.0 branch which corresponds to the 3.0 kernel ..( eg - hwcomposer sources)
so it will be better if u can compile and upload both ROM + KERNEL package in order to have maximum working efficiency
Shubhamqweasd said:
i think , quarx2k also made many changes with his CM 10.1-3.0 branch which corresponds to the 3.0 kernel ..( eg - hwcomposer sources)
so it will be better if u can compile and upload both ROM + KERNEL package in order to have maximum working efficiency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're right,because i could not boot this kernel on 4.1.2 so tried with 4.2.1 without adb manual boot,the difference is that i added forced module unloading and allow old eabi binaries to run with this kernel trying to get some backwards compatibility thus my conclusion is that either this kernel needs scratch bins in the os for propper functioning
rodrigoswz said:
What's this? A fix for CM10.1 23/01?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope,my bad to mention that is an kernel build on quarx repo
You know opening a new thread was unnecessary as we already have a 3.0 kernel thread and CM10.1 also.... BTW the kernel and CM10.1 are both easily compiled if you know what you're doing
Let's Go ^_^
Kayant said:
You know opening a new thread was unnecessary as we already have a 3.0 kernel thread and CM10.1 also.... BTW the kernel and CM10.1 are both easily compiled if you know what you're doing
Let's Go ^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thread is already reported
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
nogoodusername said:
The thread is already reported
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for your support nogood username,that helps alot and to what i can do for this comunity,for example my own kernel sources for linux kernel 3.7.5,as of this post was just an test to see if it works and 3.7.5 yup it likes the cpcap drivers and firmware,just some gpu issues to display under menuconfig
drunk_ryder24 said:
thank you for your support nogood username,that helps alot and to what i can do for this comunity,for example my own kernel sources for linux kernel 3.7.5,as of this post was just an test to see if it works and 3.7.5 yup it likes the cpcap drivers and firmware,just some gpu issues to display under menuconfig
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate your work, and I'm not the one that reported (as far as I remember)
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
nogoodusername said:
I appreciate your work, and I'm not the one that reported (as far as I remember)
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe i started wrong but my intention was to give some help for the comunity,as for my attempt on kernel 3.7.5:bump cant port sgx drivers,got cpcap to show up in menuconfig even mapphone but its like impossible to show up,tried a workaround with similar devices to get the gpu drivers but no chance
drunk_ryder24 said:
maybe i started wrong but my intention was to give some help for the comunity,as for my attempt on kernel 3.7.5:bump cant port sgx drivers,got cpcap to show up in menuconfig even mapphone but its like impossible to show up,tried a workaround with similar devices to get the gpu drivers but no chance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your efforts I think I was the one that reported it can't remember now ..... The reason I did it was because like you said you're trying to port 3.7.5 which we already have thread for where you cab discuss about porting 3.0.0 kernels
Some advice and questions......
I was wondering why are you trying to port 3.7.5 which is not even on any other android device yet??
IMO I think a higher version of the 3.0 base kernel is not needed as am sure most of the new things in it would not benefit us as we probably couldn't use it anyway since we have old drivers, old cpu/gpu etc.....
Getting it to show up in defconfig is not the hard part you can activate anything you want from there they are just the configuring files the hard part is configuring the activated drivers for the defy which requires dev work and debugging just look Quark's commits
I think what we have is fine and I don't think anything much higher would be any benefit for us also we have older drivers and the things we need for 4.2 to work properly are in 3.0.8 like the new wifi drivers maybe Quarx will update it to a higher minor version later like he did with 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.60......
Don't worry yourself to much there are many other things you can do to help us in the defy community. This is not worth your time trust me from experience :cyclops:
Btw the menuconfig iust activates the stuff you want for your device and mapphone_defconfig is where all the options you picked from menuconfig is stored. Each defconfig is different as they are specify to one device.
Kayant said:
Thanks for your efforts I think I was the one that reported it can't remember now ..... The reason I did it was because like you said you're trying to port 3.7.5 which we already have thread for where you cab discuss about porting 3.0.0 kernels
Some advice and questions......
I was wondering why are you trying to port 3.7.5 which is not even on any other android device yet??
IMO I think a higher version of the 3.0 base kernel is not needed as am sure most of the new things in it would not benefit us as we probably couldn't use it anyway since we have old drivers, old cpu/gpu etc.....
Getting it to show up in defconfig is not the hard part you can activate anything you want from there they are just the configuring files the hard part is configuring the activated drivers for the defy which requires dev work and debugging just look Quark's commits
I think what we have is fine and I don't think anything much higher would be any benefit for us also we have older drivers and the things we need for 4.2 to work properly are in 3.0.8 like the new wifi drivers maybe Quarx will update it to a higher minor version later like he did with 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.60......
Don't worry yourself to much there are many other things you can do to help us in the defy community. This is not worth your time trust me from experience :cyclops:
Btw the menuconfig iust activates the stuff you want for your device and mapphone_defconfig is where all the options you picked from menuconfig is stored. Each defconfig is different as they are specify to one device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats the whole point,everithing gets trouc the cross compiler even battery and every hw aspect for defy,but cant seem to get sgx drivers on it it boots but only backlight flickers,also the importance of this is that one day we might bump in a problem like this(maybe future android versions will use kernel 3.7.5 as default)and my opinion is that we should have some widen experience about it in any way possible
Kayant said:
Thanks for your efforts I think I was the one that reported it can't remember now ..... The reason I did it was because like you said you're trying to port 3.7.5 which we already have thread for where you cab discuss about porting 3.0.0 kernels
Some advice and questions......
I was wondering why are you trying to port 3.7.5 which is not even on any other android device yet??
IMO I think a higher version of the 3.0 base kernel is not needed as am sure most of the new things in it would not benefit us as we probably couldn't use it anyway since we have old drivers, old cpu/gpu etc.....
Getting it to show up in defconfig is not the hard part you can activate anything you want from there they are just the configuring files the hard part is configuring the activated drivers for the defy which requires dev work and debugging just look Quark's commits
I think what we have is fine and I don't think anything much higher would be any benefit for us also we have older drivers and the things we need for 4.2 to work properly are in 3.0.8 like the new wifi drivers maybe Quarx will update it to a higher minor version later like he did with 2.6.32.9 to 2.6.32.60......
Don't worry yourself to much there are many other things you can do to help us in the defy community. This is not worth your time trust me from experience :cyclops:
Btw the menuconfig iust activates the stuff you want for your device and mapphone_defconfig is where all the options you picked from menuconfig is stored. Each defconfig is different as they are specify to one device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and how is that a problem if someone wants to attempt a higher version kernel?
if there is no benefit then there is no loss either
I understand your point and even I know nothing is impossible.
BUT, there has to be a logic in things that you are doing, isn't it? Believe me, Nobody is discouraging him. Anyways, its a matter of understanding and not a debate.
FYI and to my knowledge, very few devices like xperia T/V has kernel 3.4
abhifx said:
and how is that a problem if someone wants to attempt a higher version kernel?
if there is no benefit then there is no loss either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like brajesh.sharma87 said am not trying to discourage him anything am just giving him some advice. This is mainly just my opinion based on experiences I had trying to port the newer wifi drivers from 3.0 base to our 2.6 kernel..... he doesn't have to listen to what am saying.
Like brajesh.sharma87 said it's matter of knowledge because the Linux kernel changes so much between versions and the work Quarx has done on the 3.0.8 base may become outdated and needs to be changed to get it to work for the new base.
Am just trying to put things into prospective as I think it's not worth his time and effort trying to port a higher version kernel without good knowledge and experience on kernel porting. Again that's for him to decide.
Drunk_ryder24 if you still want to try here are is something you can do that may help -
If you haven't already tried this but try cherry-picking Quarx's commits from the p-android-omap3-3.0 branch since the code is related to the defy but keep in mind not all of Quarx's work may work on the new base.
Kayant said:
Like brajesh.sharma87 said am not trying to discourage him anything am just giving him some advice. This is mainly just my opinion based on experiences I had trying to port the newer wifi drivers from 3.0 base to our 2.6 kernel..... he doesn't have to listen to what am saying.
Like brajesh.sharma87 said it's matter of knowledge because the Linux kernel changes so much between versions and the work Quarx has done on the 3.0.8 base may become outdated and needs to be changed to get it to work for the new base.
Am just trying to put things into prospective as I think it's not worth his time and effort trying to port a higher version kernel without good knowledge and experience on kernel porting. Again that's for him to decide.
Drunk_ryder24 if you still want to try here are is something you can do that may help -
If you haven't already tried this but try cherry-picking Quarx's commits from the p-android-omap3-3.0 branch since the code is related to the defy but keep in mind not all of Quarx's work may work on the new base.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well ive done cherry picking from quarx repo and i must say that quarx done an excelent job compiling the modules since they are recognized and compiled by the toolchain with no major errors,just a few ignorable errors,boy quarx must have nerves of steel to bare so much time in developing from scratch,oh btw i will post this as a reply in 4.1.2 tread,ive mixed kernel zimage and ramdisk of quarx 2.6.32.60 after applying sevenrock's kernel 2.6.32.9-the whole point is that it might have been something changed in either ril or wifi module cause 2.6.32.60 seems just a little laggy but no ringtone bug or reboots by this method
drunk_ryder24 said:
well ive done cherry picking from quarx repo and i must say that quarx done an excelent job compiling the modules since they are recognized and compiled by the toolchain with no major errors,just a few ignorable errors,boy quarx must have nerves of steel to bare so much time in developing from scratch,oh btw i will post this as a reply in 4.1.2 tread,ive mixed kernel zimage and ramdisk of quarx 2.6.32.60 after applying sevenrock's kernel 2.6.32.9-the whole point is that it might have been something changed in either ril or wifi module cause 2.6.32.60 seems just a little laggy but no ringtone bug or reboots by this method
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds good am I bit surprised it worked so well with not that much errors but thats's good Yh I know Quarx is unstoppable and good luck with the project ..... If you need any more advice or help just shoot me up with a pm and I will see what I can do
kayant said:
that sounds good am i bit surprised it worked so well with not that much errors but thats's good yh i know quarx is unstoppable and good luck with the project :d..... If you need any more advice or help just shoot me up with a pm and i will see what i can do
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for your support,its wellcomed
Moved the kernel to its own thread
https://forum.xda-developers.com/shield-tablet/development/oc-k1-nougat-t3996325
I suggest android file host...
Can't wait for the kernel to come out!
Hazel nut said:
Can't wait for the kernel to come out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its pretty much done, im just trying to squeeze more speed out of it.. also the tap to wake seems to only work when it wants.. i loose access to rear camera, but my sons works fine, not that i use it for taking pictures lol, ill upload a v1 for people linked to my dropbox as i dont know how to upload here yet..:good:
v1.0
v1.0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/k0d1wjrxxki8p8f/Bleeblun OC K1.zip?dl=1[/QUOTE]
Bleeblun said:
v1.0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/k0d1wjrxxki8p8f/Bleeblun OC K1.zip?dl=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you need to check XDA rules before uploading kernels. I think XDA require that kernel sources must be available.
Anyway I'm sure you can check out the forum guidelines for submitting kernels.
Happy compiling.
Sent from my Nvidia Shield Tablet using XDA Labs
jemail said:
I think you need to check XDA rules before uploading kernels. I think XDA require that kernel sources must be available.
Anyway I'm sure you can check out the forum guidelines for submitting kernels.
Happy compiling.
That’s why I asked, but no one seems interested in responding or helping in any way.. I know people have uploaded guides, but they aren’t easy to follow or even close to how to do it.. I asked how to do it - 600 people read it and not one person responded ?*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can't expect all 600 people to be devs ?
Read the xda forum rules and you will find that you need to have some number of posts (10 I think??) before you can make a rom/kernel/development thread (afaik, might be wrong). For uploading, afh is prefered, and uploading source code is probably a must.
Thanks for your effort never the less!
Edit: typo
Nah, I didn’t expect 600 devs, but someone to point me in the right direction maybe.. for being self taught and copying/modifying bits of wolfies code into bitobs codes - how can I point them to the source? would I need to upload my modified source to github?
Also as for making 10 posts - do I just post random junk to get my count up? ?* It just seems a bit crap to me, I should just make a post explaining how to do it..
I don't know honestly, I would guess you need to upload the modified code (so probably the thing you compile into the flashable image) to github yes, with all the polite thanks and props to bitO and werewolf.
As for the post count, again, I told you I'm not sure about it (or anything I said really, because I myself am not a dev), so spend an hour or two reading xda rules, there has to be something that answers your problems or we would have steel01 and every other dev asking the same things...
V2-oc-k1 shield tablet
V2 - faster and smoother
Shield tablet OC-K1
More file system supports
Slightly undervolted to help temperatures
Probably a lot more but can't remember..
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7bd72jvzijmosh4/Bleeblun OC K1 v2.zip?dl=1
V2 - faster and smoother
Done a post for it somewhere but here's a link
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7bd72jvzijmosh4/Bleeblun OC K1 v2.zip?dl=1
Is this kernel for stock or Lineage? On Lineage v2 doesn't boot.
It’s for stock nougat
Could you cook something for lineage 15.1?
it’s should be easy enough to do, just I’d have nothing to test it on, as I’m not swapping to lineage
Leave that up to me, no problem. If you could I would thank you.
Hi, thanks for the kernel (just found it). Did you enable multirom as I'm currently using Stock and Lineage ?
jpearn said:
Hi, thanks for the kernel (just found it). Did you enable multirom as I'm currently using Stock and Lineage ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is multirom all i need to enable? ill search for it in the menuconfig as youre not the only one asking for lineage.. whats the benefit of lineage anyway? as i dont see the point of loosing nvidia experience games. A free gaming pc, why would i loose that..
Disrupthor said:
Could you cook something for lineage 15.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres another guy asking for lineage, whats the benefit, also he has pointed me in a direction to enable it for lineage, so ill give it a search. however you guys will have to let me know if it works as i dont want to loose nvidia experience