I found this old thread for the nexus 4..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/benchmark-tests-o-schedulers-t2360078
Not a good comparison to the OnePlus One, HOWEVER, there is screenshots DO back up what is being said.
FIOPS seems to be the best, followed by SIO, and BFQ seemed to be the worst.
Anyone have any input?
This is pretty old and with all the patches made on bfq I doubt it's still the worst. I'd dare to say the contrary. Not like the schedulers have significant impact on anything. I don't have any Screenshots for you though. And I am mostly saying this about mako, I don't have opo for that long to see the difference.
Almayce said:
This is pretty old and with all the patches made on bfq I doubt it's still the worst. I'd dare to say the contrary. Not like the schedulers have significant impact on anything. I don't have any Screenshots for you though. And I am mostly saying this about mako, I don't have opo for that long to see the difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel the same way. Its all a placebo effect for me.
As for me,
CFQ works the best,
With few tuning though,
slice_idle 0
quantum 32
slice_async 16
You can test your before and after I/0 performances,
My 2nd option is ROW,
For the note : Im using Sensei R77 kernel to get this I/O
I am using stock, Interactive + ROW, no issues and running perfectly smooth.
otonieru said:
As for me,
CFQ works the best,
With few tuning though,
slice_idle 0
quantum 32
slice_async 16
You can test your before and after I/0 performances,
My 2nd option is ROW,
For the note : Im using Sensei R77 kernel to get this I/O
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the settings! Which app do you use to test?
I would say bfq is one of the best schedulers http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J-e7LnJblm8
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
DerRomtester said:
I would say bfq is one of the best schedulers http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J-e7LnJblm8
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sold! Bfq runs really good even with a heavy workload in the background. Wow..
OmegaBlaze said:
I'm sold! Bfq runs really good even with a heavy workload in the background. Wow..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just checked on the BFQ details,
now i see why it perform very good,
basically it does all the tweaks i did on CFQ, only, directly in Factory State! hahaha
awesome scheduler
Related
What's the best scheduler to use in govnah? Noop, BFQ or CFQ?
It is, in my opinion, considered BFQ is better than CFQ on mobile platforms.
The real question is, BFQ or Noop? Noop was created for the sole purpose of working with flash memory, so is it possible it's better?
If there isn't already, there should be a benchmark comparing the two throughputs. But, as always, there's gonna be pro's and con's on each side.
There's not gonna be a clear winner.
Ok thanks for your answer. I've currently got it set to BFQ. I've got it OC'd to 1.5ghz and with all the patches but I still notice it lags sometimes.
Sent from my Nexus S running NSCollab ROM and Netarchy 1.3.4 CFS Kernel
Not very rigorous:
warthog at 1.5
sunspider
cfq: 3541
bfq: 3284
noop: 3293
lower is better
Where do you change that? I can't find it anywhere? The scheduler option I mean.
Seanbest said:
Where do you change that? I can't find it anywhere? The scheduler option I mean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Profiles > Advanced Settings > Scheduler
Sent from my Nexus S running NSCollab ROM and Netarchy 1.3.4 CFS Kernel
Is it bfq or cfq?
And should I choose performance over conservative in voltage control?
I always got kernel panic when I undervolted, too.
Sent from my Saurom'd Infuse
I always left my infuse CPU/voltage at stock settings....never had any probs and the phone was fast enough and lasted me the day...not that is helpful for you question...but if I were you I wouldnt mess with CPU and voltage...but that's just me
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Crinkypops said:
Is it bfq or cfq?
And should I choose performance over conservative in voltage control?
I always got kernel panic when I undervolted, too.
Sent from my Saurom'd Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using cfq with ondemand, and undervolt 50 mV each not much but its stable. Performance setting will kill your battery.
I was under the impression that noop is theoretically the best I/O scheduler for flash devices, but I can't find any good benchmarks comparing its performance to the others in a typical real world smartphone workload.
Btw I don't consider using "time dd" to be very helpful in replicating a real world multitasking workload. What's the point of testing a scheduler with a single file read or write? You may or may not have background processes reading or writing at the time of the test, but you wouldn't necessarily know it. As such, I would take any single threaded I/O benchmarks or simple tests with a grain of salt, even on a smartphone.
If someone with more knowledge of smartphone I/O access patterns sees a need to correct me on this, I would appreciate it. I'm an experienced *nix admin, but pretty much still a noob regarding android.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
Hey guys just tested my infuse and i got 1540 don t know if it s good so here let me know how r yours!:good:
Here's mine. Running beanstalk. No performance settings touched.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
BeanStalk, settings adjusted and played with all around
I can get 2200+or- running Gingerbread 2.3.6 deodexed,but it doesn't feel any smoother or faster,only beanchmarks better
After my previous post I finally got around to installing the latest BeanStalk(1.179a-20130401) so here is a benchmark from it.
Using qkster's 2.3.6. with conservative governor, max frequency 1600, I just got 2532.
As I recall I used to get 1100-1300 on Froyo stock.
Then 1800-2000 on GB rooted with bloatware removed
When clocked to 1600, I think it's usually in the range 2300-2500.
I agree the number doens't mean much. It's how it responds when you ask it to do something. The way our phone works is pretty darned good for an "old" phone.
electricpete1 said:
Using qkster's 2.3.6. with conservative governor, max frequency 1600, I just got 2532.
As I recall I used to get 1100-1300 on Froyo stock.
Then 1800-2000 on GB rooted with bloatware removed
When clocked to 1600, I think it's usually in the range 2300-2500.
I agree the number doens't mean much. It's how it responds when you ask it to do something. The way our phone works is pretty darned good for an "old" phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which are you using for IO scheduler,your IO is off the charts compared to what I've been getting
elbscorp said:
Which are you using for IO scheduler,your IO is off the charts compared to what I've been getting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I/O scheduler - NOOP
electricpete1 said:
I/O scheduler - NOOP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks,that's what i use don't get that kind of score. Must be in other settings.
Please forgive me for asking, if this has already been answered. Question for the Devs... Will any future releases (kernel only, or ROM) include a wider selection of governors and i/o schedulers, or is this device limited to the ones already available for some reason?
Coming over from HTC Glacier and Doubleshot, there were more choices than I knew what to do with. This is my first Samsung device.
Not that I'm complaining, I've found a combination that works good for me. I just wanted to know.
By the way - you guys are doing some great work over here. I'm loving this phone. Thanks!
This would be done on the kernel level and it is certainly possible to add more options but doing so can make things less stable.
If there is something you think may work better you could ask a dev if implementing has been tried and what the result is otherwise the main kernel source is available on github and there are many guides to build yourself and test
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
demkantor said:
This would be done on the kernel level and it is certainly possible to add more options but doing so can make things less stable.
If there is something you think may work better you could ask a dev if implementing has been tried and what the result is otherwise the main kernel source is available on github and there are many guides to build yourself and test
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure the devs have sound reasoning behind their choices. I was just curious to find out if it was something device specific, as opposed to dev preference. I don't know that I would go so far, as to tamper with the kernel source myself. I don't have those skills yet. I may look into that in the future. I'm always willing to learn.
jadrt09 said:
Please forgive me for asking, if this has already been answered. Question for the Devs... Will any future releases (kernel only, or ROM) include a wider selection of governors and i/o schedulers, or is this device limited to the ones already available for some reason?
Coming over from HTC Glacier and Doubleshot, there were more choices than I knew what to do with. This is my first Samsung device.
Not that I'm complaining, I've found a combination that works good for me. I just wanted to know.
By the way - you guys are doing some great work over here. I'm loving this phone. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hit the app store and grab CPU Tuner, you might find it's got what you need.
yohan4ws said:
Hit the app store and grab CPU Tuner, you might find it's got what you need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'll check that one out but I believe that apps like that will only allow you to select from the governors and schedulers that are available in the kernel itself - not implement one that isn't there. I'd like to try out intellidemand, or smartassV2 with this device.
Right now, I'm using the interactive governor & sio. Then using SetCPU with profiles for screen-off, screen-on, and charging. This is kind of giving me the results I wanted. Sort of gives me an interactiveX, I guess? SetCPU doesn't show me both cores, so I really don't know. Also have tried Kernel Tuner and Trickster with mixed results.
jadrt09 said:
Thanks, I'll check that one out but I believe that apps like that will only allow you to select from the governors and schedulers that are available in the kernel itself - not implement one that isn't there. I'd like to try out intellidemand, or smartassV2 with this device.
Right now, I'm using the interactive governor & sio. Then using SetCPU with profiles for screen-off, screen-on, and charging. This is kind of giving me the results I wanted. Sort of gives me an interactiveX, I guess? SetCPU doesn't show me both cores, so I really don't know. Also have tried Kernel Tuner and Trickster with mixed results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just downloaded CPU Tuner. This appears to be a better alternative to the other ones I've tried. I can get what I want without trying to mess with the kernel. Gonna run the "Sophisticated" config + Performance profile for a while and see how it goes. Thanks! :good:
jadrt09 said:
Please forgive me for asking, if this has already been answered. Question for the Devs... Will any future releases (kernel only, or ROM) include a wider selection of governors and i/o schedulers, or is this device limited to the ones already available for some reason?
Coming over from HTC Glacier and Doubleshot, there were more choices than I knew what to do with. This is my first Samsung device.
Not that I'm complaining, I've found a combination that works good for me. I just wanted to know.
By the way - you guys are doing some great work over here. I'm loving this phone. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my roms have more freedom of the kernel with this...current governors in my builds are: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, interactive, and performance. Current I/O schedulers are noop, deadline, row, cfq, and sio. i will be exapanding on this soon but sio and interactive or sio and ondemand have given the bast stability for me.
REV3NT3CH said:
my roms have more freedom of the kernel with this...current governors in my builds are: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, interactive, and performance. Current I/O schedulers are noop, deadline, row, cfq, and sio. i will be exapanding on this soon but sio and interactive or sio and ondemand have given the bast stability for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running your Carbon ROM for a little while and I've been pretty pleased with it. I've settled on the interactive and sio combination but I wanted to have a little more control. Most of the time I just text and do a little web browsing, so I want to extend battery life. But I have access to a lot of wi-fi hotspots, so then I can plug in for some gaming or Netflix. It's nice to have the performance amped up then. I seemed to have good results with intellidemand and smartass variations on my other phones.
I appreciate your work, thanks!
jadrt09 said:
I've been running your Carbon ROM for a little while and I've been pretty pleased with it. I've settled on the interactive and sio combination but I wanted to have a little more control. Most of the time I just text and do a little web browsing, so I want to extend battery life. But I have access to a lot of wi-fi hotspots, so then I can plug in for some gaming or Netflix. It's nice to have the performance amped up then. I seemed to have good results with intellidemand and smartass variations on my other phones.
I appreciate your work, thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your very welcome...as ive stated before i will be adding some more here soon. i have a couple of new rom builds im working on and an update to another...i definitely need to work on the kernel as ive done little patches here and there but nothing too big....think within the next few weeks ill do a big update to it and update all my roms with it
Perhaps you could release a flashable kernel for people on cm?
Sent from my SGH-T699 using Tapatalk
REV3NT3CH said:
my roms have more freedom of the kernel with this...current governors in my builds are: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, interactive, and performance. Current I/O schedulers are noop, deadline, row, cfq, and sio. i will be exapanding on this soon but sio and interactive or sio and ondemand have given the bast stability for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Errr What advantages are there from sio over the other i/o schedulers. That's the only addition between your list and what we are currently enabling.
Magamo said:
Errr What advantages are there from sio over the other i/o schedulers. That's the only addition between your list and what we are currently enabling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simple I/O (sio) scheduler aims to keep minimum overhead to achieve low latency to serve I/O requests. No priority quesues concepts, but only basic merging. Sio is a mix between noop & deadline. No reordering or sorting of requests.
REV3NT3CH said:
Simple I/O (sio) scheduler aims to keep minimum overhead to achieve low latency to serve I/O requests. No priority quesues concepts, but only basic merging. Sio is a mix between noop & deadline. No reordering or sorting of requests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I notice a difference in performance when I change governors but I can't say that I notice a difference at all, when changing i/o schedulers. My understanding is that certain combinations are supposed to work better together. I just remember that devs of certain mods I've used had a preference for sio o over the others. Not sure why, but it worked, so I've stuck with it...
There are a few governors and i/o schedulers that I have never seen before and after searching, I haven't really come up with any good information. If someone with more knowledge than I would be willing to point me in the right direction, I would appreciate the help. Or, perhaps posting a brief explanation would be beneficial to all?
Here is a list of the ones I'm unsure about:
Governors; darkness, intelliactive, dancedance, smartmax, uberdemand
Schedulers; vr, fiops, tripndroid, zen
Does anyone have any suggested uses, or combinations for these?
Google will give you a great explanation on these governors...personally Zen and sio are great with battery
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I use Wheatley and zen, works perfectly and a great battery performance
Sent from my SGH-T699 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
REV3NT3CH said:
Google will give you a great explanation on these governors...personally Zen and sio are great with battery
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Naturally, I tried to search Google and the forums first. Seems like I keep coming across outdated material that doesn't explain much on the ones I listed. I'm already pretty happy using a set-up I'm familiar with - this was really more for educational purposes. I'm always wondering if I can tweak a little something and get better results.
This is the list I come across most often...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/development/guide-android-governors-explained-t2017715
Player-J said:
Naturally, I tried to search Google and the forums first. Seems like I keep coming across outdated material that doesn't explain much on the ones I listed. I'm already pretty happy using a set-up I'm familiar with - this was really more for educational purposes. I'm always wondering if I can tweak a little something and get better results.
This is the list I come across most often...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/development/guide-android-governors-explained-t2017715
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been trying to find some results on the same governors but found very little. I've even done more than google but no luck. Anyway I will probably experiment a little and not worry about it.
Hello,
I have the possibility to choose the governor "optimax". So I have search at google about information of this governor. But I didn't found an explaination or other information. Can anybody help me? What are the differents to the other (default) Governors? Thanks.
Player-J said:
There are a few governors and i/o schedulers that I have never seen before and after searching, I haven't really come up with any good information. If someone with more knowledge than I would be willing to point me in the right direction, I would appreciate the help. Or, perhaps posting a brief explanation would be beneficial to all?
Here is a list of the ones I'm unsure about:
Governors; darkness, intelliactive, dancedance, smartmax, uberdemand
Schedulers; vr, fiops, tripndroid, zen
Does anyone have any suggested uses, or combinations for these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know darkness is a modified nightmare governor for stability and battery life, and nightmare is a modified pegasusq governor that tries to save battery by not scaling as aggressively and improving stability, it also doesn't hotplug as readily as pegasusq from what I understood.
Also intelliactive is a modified interactive by faux with the following modifications :
"1. self-boost capability from input drivers (no need for PowerHAL assist)
2. two phase scheduling (idle/busy phases to prevent from jumping directly to max freq
3. Checks for offline cpus and short circuits some unnecessary checks to improve code execution paths"
Dance Dance is a unique governor modified for performance but based on conservative. DD Provides a nice blend of performance and efficient battery life.
Uberdemand is Ondemand and with 2-phase feature meaning it has a soft cap at 1728 MHz so your cpu won't always go directly to max, made by Chet Kener.
Smartmax is a new governor which is a mix between ondemand and smartass2 By default this is configured for battery save.
Hope this helps!