Related
Well there are already users which has used a 64gb micro SD with NTFS format. So I guess that can confirm that it is definitely okay.
On my galaxy y, it's possible to use SWAP (virtual RAM) with the micro SD to add some RAM to the device.
Here is the link http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1659231
Would that be possible with the TF300?
I've read others here using one with no issue.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Just saying its sdxc and yes it should work as long as you format it to fat32
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Why fat32? Having a card that size seems useless unless you can put high def movies on it. Why can't you use ntfs?
I'm not sure if you can use any other formats that's just what people have had success with.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
afaik android cant automount ntfs formatted cards, you'll need a mounter app or a custom script.
formatted a Sandisk Class 10 64gb micro SD with NTFS from a Windows 7 computer and works fine on the TF300.
Gets past the 4gb file limit limitation.
Haven't tried to copy anything from the tablet to the SD card yet.
NixZero said:
afaik android cant automount ntfs formatted cards, you'll need a mounter app or a custom script.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine auto mounts on every rom I have used without issue.
bahman123 said:
formatted a Sandisk Class 10 64gb micro SD with NTFS from a Windows 7 computer and works fine on the TF300.
Gets past the 4gb file limit limitation.
Haven't tried to copy anything from the tablet to the SD card yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So since you've been able to use a 64gb NTFS micro SD, I guess it works
If there any speed difference with Fat32 and NTFS? In regard of transferring files since app data cannot be mounted onto external SDs anymore.
Ulric099 said:
So since you've been able to use a 64gb NTFS micro SD, I guess it works
If there any speed difference with Fat32 and NTFS? In regard of transferring files since app data cannot be mounted onto external SDs anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no speed difference, you need to get a lower class number card for that. Fat32 sucks because it has a 4 gig file size limit. For me, since I use my tablet for a lot of media on the go, I can't put any movies on a Fat 32 card.
Turbojugend said:
There is no speed difference, you need to get a lower class number card for that. Fat32 sucks because it has a 4 gig file size limit. For me, since I use my tablet for a lot of media on the go, I can't put any movies on a Fat 32 card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't need to put any files that bigger than 4GB, so is there any other difference besides the 4 GB file size limit?
nooktablet said:
i don't need to put any files that bigger than 4GB, so is there any other difference besides the 4 GB file size limit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ntfs has journaling and more detailed file atributes, this is usefull and make it stronger but also make for a bit of overhead.
shouldnt be noticeable.
Right now i have a class 10 micro sd card 32 gb. I used Swapit Expander and gave my phone 2gb of virtual memory and 90 swapiness. I dont really notice it, i got better quadrant scores but nothing worth noticing. Right now im getting 4837 on quadrant
nooktablet said:
i don't need to put any files that bigger than 4GB, so is there any other difference besides the 4 GB file size limit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think NTFS record filenames in alpha sequence when they are added so when you use any app, the default sequence is filename.
FAT/FAT32 records filenames as first in first out (not in alpha order of filename).
Sometimes, I have to use FATSorter to sort them. We need filename order like TV shows (24h or Spooks MI-5) so video player can play one after the other.
So todays deal of the day offered a bunch of Sandisk cards, I ordered the 64g sdxc class 10 card which is in exfat formatting. Now, I have been reading over and over the same things about the correct format for our device, but no clear definitions on what the real deal is, just if there was any problem the answer was "format to fat32". Now its clearly stated that exfat is supported by our device, but other variants have apparently dropped this support on recent updates. That info is useless to me because all I care about is our variant. So what is the deal, keep the exfat format or convert to fat32? Not being able to move over 4gb would kind of be a pain, but obviously do not want issues. Does keeping in exfat have security risks of losing your info or not? I could care less about nandroids going on the card, so lets eliminate that issue which apparently calls for fat32. There are too many conflicting threads about this issue, so searching this toppic is pretty useless as its a bunch of single issues with no true ties to the fundemental truth. I really want some reliable info here as I have about an hour to cancel this order!!!
annoyingduck said:
So todays deal of the day offered a bunch of Sandisk cards, I ordered the 64g sdxc class 10 card which is in exfat formatting. Now, I have been reading over and over the same things about the correct format for our device, but no clear definitions on what the real deal is, just if there was any problem the answer was "format to fat32". Now its clearly stated that exfat is supported by our device, but other variants have apparently dropped this support on recent updates. That info is useless to me because all I care about is our variant. So what is the deal, keep the exfat format or convert to fat32? Not being able to move over 4gb would kind of be a pain, but obviously do not want issues. Does keeping in exfat have security risks of losing your info or not? I could care less about nandroids going on the card, so lets eliminate that issue which apparently calls for fat32. There are too many conflicting threads about this issue, so searching this toppic is pretty useless as its a bunch of single issues with no true ties to the fundemental truth. I really want some reliable info here as I have about an hour to cancel this order!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exFat has to be supported by the kernel, so it depends on the kernel you're running. If it's not supported you'll have to use FAT32. It's as simple as that. (blame Microsoft)
I formatted mine to FAT32 as a kernel I wanted to try didn't support exFat. Haven't looked back since... It's not that big of a deal to me as 99% of my files are under 4GB, and the ones that are that size have no business being on my phone.
Simple truth, I love it......
Thanks for a solid answer. You have a preferred method for formatting to fat32?
annoyingduck said:
Simple truth, I love it......
Thanks for a solid answer. You have a preferred method for formatting to fat32?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used some miscellaneous formatting program I had installed for some reason, but the included Windows format tool does just fine.
annoyingduck said:
Simple truth, I love it......
Thanks for a solid answer. You have a preferred method for formatting to fat32?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea phone will support extFat but some roms/kernels don't. And no recovery does. If you have files such as movies over 4GB put them on internal or compress a little. I will PM you the format app.
annoyingduck said:
Simple truth, I love it......
Thanks for a solid answer. You have a preferred method for formatting to fat32?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of them work, but from what I've read the stand is SDFormatter from SDCard.org. This is the worldwide SDCard Association for setting industry memory card standards.
prdog1 said:
Yea phone will support extFat but some roms/kernels don't. And no recovery does. If you have files such as movies over 4GB put them on internal or compress a little. I will PM you the format app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, thanks pr. If the only issue is the 4gb transfer, that's practically not an issue at all for me, lol.
The card will still be stable after formatting? I keep all my ti backups, media, zips, etc on it, would rather not have to copy to my computer as well if not needed. I've not yet experienced a card "crashing", and don't want too either...
annoyingduck said:
Nice, thanks pr. If the only issue is the 4gb transfer, that's practically not an issue at all for me, lol.
The card will still be stable after formatting? I keep all my ti backups, media, zips, etc on it, would rather not have to copy to my computer as well if not needed. I've not yet experienced a card "crashing", and don't want too either...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They had some bad ones in the beginning from the reports but I have had same card since phone pre-order release with no problems using TWRP.
thanksss
David_mclaren said:
thanksss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible to partition a SD card for my phone so that I can enjoy both worlds on the same device?
use this program...
http://db.tt/s0jAvdQ7
I've seen a few posts about people saying the NAND controller in the TF700 is slow and that is what causes a number of performance issues. Is this NAND in charge of both the internal and external cards or did they select a poor one just for the internal memory and went with a better quality controller for the external?
One reason I'm asking is that I saw a few people under the CleanROM thread mention that they moved a bunch of their apps over to a fast USH-1 MicroSD and it make a huge difference. But, if the controller was slow and shared across all cards, then that shouldn't help as the bottleneck would still be there. So, are they mistaken or does moving apps (Data2SD was the app they mentioned allowing them to do this) alleviate performance issues?
If it did alleviate issues, couldn't we use this to our advantage and install the OS to a USH-1 card and use internal memory for storage only? Or, come up with a good way to strategically place all applications on the available storage card as a part of rom installation.
OR, people are wrong and there's no way performance could be improved as the NAND is shared.
Can anyone speak to this?
I think one of the advantages is that the USH-1 cards are much faster than the NAND memory in the TF700. I plan on picking one up when time permits to find out for myself.
However I'll admit I have no real understanding of how it works. Many seem to be supporting it though, and I think Scott plans to implement it into his kernel so there must be something to it.
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
You must be talking about the Data2SD mod in the development section.
I'm planning on doing this when my Sandisk 64gig UHS1 card gets to me.
Thats OK said:
You must be talking about the Data2SD mod in the development section.
I'm planning on doing this when my Sandisk 64gig UH1 card gets to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess maybe I'm mixing up terminology or what I've read.
I thought what people were saying is slow, wasn't the memory in the TF700, but the memory controller that manages the memory. I've seen people say "NAND Chipset", as saying that the specific chipset is cheap and they should have went with a higher quality.
Now, if the controller is not bad but hey went with cheap and slow memory, then this makes much more sense. Using that mod to move apps to a UH1 card would drastically improve performance. I also ordered one (this morning) from Amazon which should get in tomorrow. From there it sounds like I'll be playing with that mod.
I'm more interested in the performance bump than extra storage.
Is this the proper card?
http://m.bestbuy.com/m/e/product/detail.jsp?skuId=3695074&pid=1218427115873
If so, its a great deal.
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Biohazard0289 said:
I'm more interested in the performance bump than extra storage.
Is this the proper card?
http://m.bestbuy.com/m/e/product/detail.jsp?skuId=3695074&pid=1218427115873
If so, its a great deal.
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I ordered:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...treme pro uhs-1 microsd&qid=1351174744&sr=8-5
According to benchmarks its the fastest of the microSDs you can get at 90mb/s.
spinaldex said:
According to benchmarks its the fastest of the microSDs you can get at 90mb/s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can the MicroSD Card slot read/write at 90mb/s?
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Mmmmm....
My understanding is, that the Hynix (formerly Hyundai) controller used for data built in has deplorable read\write speeds.
Hynix just brands certain products and some unknown maker stamps out the hardware.
Evidently moving the data partition along with system cache to a speedier better quality external SDcard plugged into the tablet will hopefully double read\write speed.
The system ram is another story.
It's all about getting system data to move a lot faster from system disc to ram to cpu.
Kind of like changing a hard disc out in a PC.
I have no idea how these devs are doing this with coding, yet if it works and stays working I'm gonna have a party!
As far as the cards go I'll have to do a lot more reading around these forums to judge what may be best.
I've read the "Ultra Hi Speed" cards work well.
It's weird tho they come in class 6 and 10.
I believe the key for a good card is being able to write small files 32kb or so very quickly on random calls from internal processing.
I keep confusing myself with all this...it will straighten out after two more pots of coffee...
Biohazard0289 said:
Can the MicroSD Card slot read/write at 90mb/s?
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In theory yes, but in real life, NO. I have tested a few digital cameras using card with 90mb/s and I never achieved this speed, (it hits 90 for like a second then quickly dropped to about 40-44mb/s). A good example is a 30mb/s you are getting less for read and even smaller for write. But if you get the 90 card, it's still better than the 30 (must compared with same manufacture and same class).
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/SDCardSpeedTests
Here is a link to some SD card speeds.
A couple on the list I've tested and my results were about the same as this list.
As always there are newer cards out that read faster that aren't on this list.
Thats OK said:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/SDCardSpeedTests
Here is a link to some SD card speeds.
A couple on the list I've tested and my results were about the same as this list.
As always there are newer cards out that read faster that aren't on this list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a good resource, however at the bottom it says those speeds are established by a large file transfer. Since we are replacing internal I/O we need small file transfer right? I'm still researching and I could be wrong though.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Biohazard0289 said:
That is a good resource, however at the bottom it says those speeds are established by a large file transfer. Since we are replacing internal I/O we need small file transfer right? I'm still researching and I could be wrong though.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True!
Small file fast writes are best.
Android won't have to deal with massive files.
Based on this, it sounds like there is an improvement in performance when using the cards. Now I just need to read the thread on that mod so I can take full advantage of it.
spinaldex said:
I've seen a few posts about people saying the NAND controller in the TF700 is slow and that is what causes a number of performance issues. Is this NAND in charge of both the internal and external cards or did they select a poor one just for the internal memory and went with a better quality controller for the external?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I researched a bit and came up with this:
The internal storage is connected to the CPU/SOC roughly like this:
[ Tegra 3 ] --- MMC interface --- [ NAND controller ] --- NAND-specific interface --- [ NAND memory array ]
Everything beyond the MMC interface is inside the eMMC chip. So the NAND controller that is slow is part of the Hynix eMMC.
Tegra 3 has 4 SD/MMC interfaces. One of them is connected to the internal eMMC, the other one to the microSD slot. The full size SD card in the dock is connected to the tablet indirectly via USB, very much like a cardreader on a PC.
There is also a NAND flash controller inside Tegra 3 - AFAIK this is not used in the TF700. The advantage of using an eMMC is that wear leveling can be offloaded to the eMMC and the software doesn't need to care.
spinaldex said:
If it did alleviate issues, couldn't we use this to our advantage and install the OS to a USH-1 card and use internal memory for storage only?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The internal eMMC is not that slow for reading, its main performance bottleneck are random writes. So keeping the system apps on the internal storage is probably good enough since the ROM is read-only in normal use, but putting the data on an external card apparently helps a lot.
I picked up an 8gig Ultra Class 10 at best buy for $11.00. I'll give it a go when I get home.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Samsung 64GB Class 10 UHS-1 Grade 1 70MB/s MicroSDXC Pro Memory Card
this is the one I am using just thought that I would share this for anyone else wanting to know.
Hi mate, could you confirm that sd card is working? Today I contact samsung support and they told me that only works up to 32gb.
If it support 64gb would be great! I also have doubts if only the standard sd line, or if plus and pro also works with it.
But could you use all 64 GB?
I am also considering a 64 GB microSD, but it would be useless if I could only be using 32 GB. Maybe try to drop some large files on your card to test?
FYI
I've been using sandisk 64gb class 10 without any issue
59.46GB of usable space.
Enjoy
Sent from my SGH-T699 using xda app-developers app
FYI
I've been using sandisk 64gb class 10 without any issue
59.46GB of usable space.
Enjoy
Sent from my SGH-T699 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi dillalade.
Is there any pre-requirement (maybe special formatting) for using a 64gb sdxc card with the realy? I'm using the original stock firmware, and samsung support told me only 32gb are allowed.
Thanks in advance!
ninguno2 said:
Hi dillalade.
Is there any pre-requirement (maybe special formatting) for using a 64gb sdxc card with the realy? I'm using the original stock firmware, and samsung support told me only 32gb are allowed.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recall having issues with my 64gb sd not reading, it was a 'format' issue.
See this post for resolution if you need it ==> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=33419784&postcount=474
dillalade said:
FYI
I've been using sandisk 64gb class 10 without any issue
59.46GB of usable space.
Enjoy
Sent from my SGH-T699 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dillalade said:
I recall having issues with my 64gb sd not reading, it was a 'format' issue.
See this post for resolution if you need it ==> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=33419784&postcount=474
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, i see you need to format as FAT32. But in that case I suppose it would not support files greater than 4gb, i'm right?
ninguno2 said:
Oh, i see you need to format as FAT32. But in that case I suppose it would not support files greater than 4gb, i'm right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's correct.
I'm using a Sandisk Ultra UHS-1 64GB card in my Relay 4G without any problems. Just yesterday had it down to about 8 GB space available, confirming it works past the 32GB barrier. I did have to do an update for Windows XP on my dad's laptop before I transferred files to my external HDD a few days ago, but otherwise had no problems there. (It wasn't till yesterday I deleted some files on the phone that had been copied to the drive - I wanted to keep some vids on the phone for a while and was handpicking them.)
Now if only I could interface directly with my 2TB hard drive (I have it in an enclosure with its own power source), without needing the laptop.
pianoplayer88key said:
........
Now if only I could interface directly with my 2TB hard drive (I have it in an enclosure with its own power source), without needing the laptop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be possible, as our phone support USB.
I tried to find some videos on yt if that works, but only this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFGUmDqRKHE
But is not that subject of course, maybe we can move it or make new threat.
Seems interesting anyway.
So the trick is to format the SDCARD in FAT32 instead of NTFS. And the drawback is you can't have a file (music, movie, whatever) that's over 4GB. Okay. Can't think of what one file would be that much, so that seems like a decent compromise.
So I guess my only question is: if you're taking a file, as in drag in drop, from your NTFS hard drive on you computer and placing it on your FAT32 SDCard on your phone, will there be any problems? As well as any problems doing it in reverse?
EpicMikeNC said:
So the trick is to format the SDCARD in FAT32 instead of NTFS. And the drawback is you can't have a file (music, movie, whatever) that's over 4GB. Okay. Can't think of what one file would be that much, so that seems like a decent compromise.
So I guess my only question is: if you're taking a file, as in drag in drop, from your NTFS hard drive on you computer and placing it on your FAT32 SDCard on your phone, will there be any problems? As well as any problems doing it in reverse?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There should be no problems in either direction, especially if you're doing it over MTP/PTP to your phone.
Another option is to format the card as ext4, which Linux and Android support natively, it's stable, and supports files up to arbitrary size (There is a limit, but it's quite a bit more than the supported maximum card size of the Relay)
Magamo said:
There should be no problems in either direction, especially if you're doing it over MTP/PTP to your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't think of this till you responded, but my USB 4GB flash drive is FAT32 and I transfer files from the 60GB hard drive on my laptop, which is NTFS, all the time. I typically do drag and drop, or I transfer via bluetooth.
Another option is to format the card as ext4, which Linux and Android support natively, it's stable, and supports files up to arbitrary size (There is a limit, but it's quite a bit more than the supported maximum card size of the Relay)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never heard of ext4, but I'll research it. In any case, from the looks of it, the Relay 4G can use 64GB micro sd cards! :good: :highfive:
I think it will depend on your hardware. Mine does not support 64 gig cards in any format on any rom... *sniff*
Hmm... I put in a generic 64 GB card from Amazon.co.uk and it worked out-of-the-box
hardy81 said:
Hmm... I put in a generic 64 GB card from Amazon.co.uk and it worked out-of-the-box
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it still working two months later? And if so, what's the brand of the generic 64 GB card?
orange808 said:
I think it will depend on your hardware. Mine does not support 64 gig cards in any format on any rom... *sniff*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a 64gb on eBay that works for me...I can give you a link...works perfect while in ROM however has issues with flashing anything..so I use my 16gb card for that
Sent from my L1QU1D R3L4Y using xda-developers app
guys, i bought a sandisk 64gb microSD XC ULTRA (not HC) and i dont know if it will work, if someone already test a card like this please share me your experience, ty a lot guys
faidesk said:
guys, i bought a sandisk 64gb microSD XC ULTRA (not HC) and i dont know if it will work, if someone already test a card like this please share me your experience, ty a lot guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it works without any problems, just put it, if is in other format the phone will ask you to format to a compatible 1
Finally there is a way to make this adaptable storage happen,
Here is the link
Modaco
ikm19 said:
Finally there is a way to make this adaptable storage happen,
Here is the link
Modaco
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not working for me, at&t variant. my id shows 179,0, not 179:XXX.
That might be a blessing. My first question was going to be how much of a performance hit did you take? It would be nice to have the option though.
Curious what the performance hit is too.
the reason why it failed was cuz card is "too slow". using that sandisk 200gb card. i have a samsung 64gb pro + card in my g4, and apparently this also works for that too. tried it and success.
At least there is apparently still a safeguard to prevent most of the people crippling their phone with cheap SD cards. I hope that when Samsung adds this officially, it will limit it to at least UHS 1 U3 cards.
The whole phone memory will be only as fast as the SD inside
Gesendet von meinem SM-G935F mit Tapatalk
so if you get the 179,0 reading your saying that the SD Card is too slow to use as adaptable storage yeh?
zombie_uk said:
so if you get the 179,0 reading your saying that the SD Card is too slow to use as adaptable storage yeh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It won't get that fast reads since it is limited to UHS-I so up to 90/MB reads/writes. Internal memory is in the 200 MB/s range so yes, it will be a huge downgrade if you use the adoptable storage.
I would like an answer for this: if I`m opening a file from sdcard (Samsung 32GB class10) and editi it, when I try to save it again, I can only do it on phone storage. Why? My sdcard it`s listed in storage like SD Card(7CD-1711)
Can someone explain, please, and tell me what to do so I will be able to save my files to sd card?
The Modaco method doesn`t work for my SM-G935F S7 Edge
Thanks in advance
I have been using this function with my 128gb Sandisk from day one.
I have moved most large apps to the SD card. In addition, I already have a part of my music collection on there as well. Have not noticed any slowdown whatsoever!
Riggster said:
That might be a blessing. My first question was going to be how much of a performance hit did you take? It would be nice to have the option though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you take a hit. I did it on my m9, used class ten, 96 write speed. wasn't horrible on every process and app but the apps it did effect were very noticeable.
zombie_uk said:
so if you get the 179,0 reading your saying that the SD Card is too slow to use as adaptable storage yeh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the source link the syntax is different. You need to do it the same as YOUR card displays. I've done it with a 200gb card.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Uea ibcan confirm i did 179,0 on my exynos s7 with a 64gb pro + and it worked fine.
mixxxk said:
the reason why it failed was cuz card is "too slow". using that sandisk 200gb card. i have a samsung 64gb pro + card in my g4, and apparently this also works for that too. tried it and success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you changed your fonts?
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
That's a screenshot of my G4.
And when I did that it showed 179,64. As it was a 64 gb card. I didn't have any real world slowness, but if u run A1 bench tool and see the read/write differences, they definitely exist.
Today I purchased a 64 GB Samsung Pro+ (Plus) micro sd card. It says it has up to: 95 MB/s read & 90 MB/s write. I benched it at 50/40 today. I manually set the adoptable storage following the procedure outlined in the MoDaco post. I used the info returned by the command that tells you what is available to use as adoptable. It worked, but is also returning a wrong storage total (I believe that the reason for this is because the SD card basically gets filled with a file that can be encrypted, so the total amount of storage that your SD card has gets added to the storage total both as it's actual space and as the file size, this is a guess but seams somewhat plausible). I am getting 73.64 GB used out of 128 GB. I have 32 internal and 64 on the sd but only 59.14. So max is 96 but it says 128 total and a lot used.
I just done this looks like it worked with a sandisk 200gb memory card but if i install a app now where will it install?. And also whats the option under storage more and migrate data for? do we need to do that?
gaspir324 said:
It won't get that fast reads since it is limited to UHS-I so up to 90/MB reads/writes. Internal memory is in the 200 MB/s range so yes, it will be a huge downgrade if you use the adoptable storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
90MB/s is nice when talking about sequential reads, but most microsd cards are going to be around 10x slower than UFS in small random reads/writes, which is where most of your phones performance is going to come from in terms of storage IO.
I think doing this stops downloading certain apps can someone try amazon sholppig or netflix says its not compatable with your device since i done this adoptable storage.
jutley said:
I think doing this stops downloading certain apps can someone try amazon sholppig or netflix says its not compatable with your device since i done this adoptable storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine still works to download and use amazon shopping. I also have Netflix installed and this also still works.
Mines a UK phone.