Related
Hi all,
I have been using CM9 on my sensation for a while now and I like it very much
But I don't really like the camera interface... So here is the MIUI Camera V17 for the sensation which can be used on android 4.0 and you can just install it as an normal application.
I thought you might want to have it as well.
This is not my application and not my work! All the credits go to the MIUI team
Maybe someone can check if there is a newer version available from the current miui roms?
Bugs:
No camcorder function working.
'Can't find camera' error after used the standard one.
Is anybody interested?
I always thought that a lot of people didn't liked the standard cm9 camera...
It's not working on ARHD 6.6.4 after normal install.
Not worked ordroid too
Sensation cihazımdan gönderildi
Might have to push it to /system/app and set permissions. I'll give it a go cause the stock ICS camera sucks.
Edit: It works but crashes when trying to switch to video mode.
I think the app might have some problems with sense roms.. maybe because it's a totally different framework..
It should work normally on vanilla ics roms.. like mine
Pushing it and fixing permission might help
sshede said:
Might have to push it to /system/app and set permissions. I'll give it a go cause the stock ICS camera sucks.
Edit: It works but crashes when trying to switch to video mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's correct...
Do you know where we can find the miui camera which is beeing used in android 4.0 miui roms?
Well, in an MIUI 4 rom of course. However, no idea. Not much an interest to find it either - I don't care for MIUI.
Fade2 said:
It's not working on ARHD 6.6.4 after normal install.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't think you have to install it as an apk! You have to push it through the system
Sent from my Sensation using Tapatalk 2
sshede said:
Well, in an MIUI 4 rom of course. However, no idea. Not much an interest to find it either - I don't care for MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really care about the MIUI roms either.. but I do care about their camera..
Do you know how you can extract a certain apk from a rom?
I have tried to extract the camera application from the new MIUI Pyramid roms... but unfortunately they have been using the framework from sense and therefore is the camera not working on vanilla android
So of now im using the latest baked rom and I think it is doing good so far. My only issue is that after taking 1 picture the camera messes up and the only way to fix it is to reboot my camera every time. This can get pretty annoying so i was wondering if it was at all possible to just install a tw camera and gallary with this rom or any aosp 4.2 build in general?
Nope. Touchwiz needs touchwiz to run properly in a nutshell. There are many options you can try from the play store though.
I'm using baked and have no problems with the camera... did you try reflashing ?
It seems that KitKat requires an ARMV7 processor to work.
There is already a project of porting KitKat to ARMV6 processors.
I'm trying up to my knowledge to port AOSP to ChaCha by adapting 4.3.1_r1, but...
Is this wasted time or work??
Thanks for your opinions.
[A]
tokafondo said:
It seems that KitKat requires an ARMV7 processor to work.
There is already a project of porting KitKat to ARMV6 processors.
I'm trying up to my knowledge to port AOSP to ChaCha by adapting 4.3.1_r1, but...
Is this wasted time or work??
Thanks for your opinions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's better that u work on CM 10.1 to remove all of bugs and make it stable instead of searching for solution to make an 4.3 ASOP ROM for chacha...
mortal19xx said:
It's better that u work on CM 10.1 to remove all of bugs and make it stable instead of searching for solution to make an 4.3 ASOP ROM for chacha...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is better to fix Cyanogen Mod than trying to build from source?? Is it not interesting to have AOSP??
tokafondo said:
Why is better to fix Cyanogen Mod than trying to build from source?? Is it not interesting to have AOSP??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be nice to have ANY finished CM rom. Problem is with each new release the last gets forgotten before it's finished. I've got a de-sensed stock rom to share if anyones interested? Cant post a link till I get post count over 10!
minimadmatt said:
It would be nice to have ANY finished CM rom. Problem is with each new release the last gets forgotten before it's finished. I've got a de-sensed stock rom to share if anyones interested? Cant post a link till I get post count over 10!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What android version?
tokafondo said:
What android version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said ANY vesrsion. The only fully working roms are the stock (not CM) Gingerbread ones and even that has a major issue with the dialler bug. I loved and had high hopes for CM9 when I first tried it but there has been no update in 18 months! These roms never get finished because the next android version comes along and interest moves to that before the previous is finished. I've tried them all and get too annoyed with the bugs so myself use stock based roms specifically Hexgores as a starting point for my own rom.
minimadmatt said:
As I said ANY vesrsion. The only fully working roms are the stock (not CM) Gingerbread ones and even that has a major issue with the dialler bug. I loved and had high hopes for CM9 when I first tried it but there has been no update in 18 months! These roms never get finished because the next android version comes along and interest moves to that before the previous is finished. I've tried them all and get too annoyed with the bugs so myself use stock based roms specifically Hexgores as a starting point for my own rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What android version is your own cooked rom based on?
tokafondo said:
What android version is your own cooked rom based on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The rom I use is based on the stock HTC 2.3.5 Gingerbread rom, Hexgores rom is on the main Chacha rom listing page which is a slightly de-bloated version of stock and my rom is a further de-bloated, de-sensed and tweaked version of that. My rom is great on battery life and everything works as it should e.g wifi, bluetooth, both cameras and so on.
minimadmatt said:
The rom I use is based on the stock HTC 2.3.5 Gingerbread rom, Hexgores rom is on the main Chacha rom listing page which is a slightly de-bloated version of stock and my rom is a further de-bloated, de-sensed and tweaked version of that. My rom is great on battery life and everything works as it should e.g wifi, bluetooth, both cameras and so on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, no dialer bug at all? What dialer and launcher are you using?? Standard?
tokafondo said:
So, no dialer bug at all? What dialer and launcher are you using?? Standard?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't say it had no dialler bug but has other tweaks that help with power usage. Using Holo launcher but at least everything works as it should unlike any currently available non-stock based rom. If efforts get diverted from JellyBean to KitKat roms then we will never get a finished decent CM rom.
I am looking for a custom ROM for my Samsung Galaxy S II Plus (GT-I9105P) which is faster than the stock ROM.
I installed Liquidsmooth 3.0 and tested the speed and its working perfectly now. Its based on Android version 4.4.3. But the camera app is actually really bad; the pictures are always blurry. I guess something is wrong with the focus, because it works fine with the original 4.2.2 Samsung Camera App. I found out that I can't restore the app because Liquidsmooth (Andoid 4.4.3) doesn't support Touchwiz Apps.
Even the apps from the PlayStore are not as good as the old SamsungCamera App.
So here's my question: Is there a fast custom ROM (preferred a popular like LiquidSmooth) which is baised on 4.2.2? Or are there others who have also problems with blurry pictures in 4.4.3 and have a fix?
CWM 10.1.3 has a lot of bugs, like no vibration, so I don't want this ROM. LiquidSmooth 2.3 is baised on Andoird 4.2.2 but there is no Download Link for the SGS II Plus / doesn't supported? Or does the Phone model even matter?
Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it!!
jwsp1 said:
I am looking for a custom ROM for my Samsung Galaxy S II Plus (GT-I9105P) which is faster than the stock ROM.
I installed Liquidsmooth 3.0 and tested the speed and its working perfectly now. Its based on Android version 4.4.3. But the camera app is actually really bad; the pictures are always blurry. I guess something is wrong with the focus, because it works fine with the original 4.2.2 Samsung Camera App. I found out that I can't restore the app because Liquidsmooth (Andoid 4.4.3) doesn't support Touchwiz Apps.
Even the apps from the PlayStore are not as good as the old SamsungCamera App.
So here's my question: Is there a fast custom ROM (preferred a popular like LiquidSmooth) which is baised on 4.2.2? Or are there others who have also problems with blurry pictures in 4.4.3 and have a fix?
CWM 10.1.3 has a lot of bugs, like no vibration, so I don't want this ROM. LiquidSmooth 2.3 is baised on Andoird 4.2.2 but there is no Download Link for the SGS II Plus / doesn't supported? Or does the Phone model even matter?
Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try lollipop rom... In my opinion has much better camera than kitkat. The only iconvenience is that still don't have the option to sd and don't have pause on camcorder yet
cracker12 said:
Try lollipop rom... In my opinion has much better camera than kitkat. The only iconvenience is that still don't have the option to sd and don't have pause on camcorder yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But isn't cwm a Rom created for more personalizing and not for increasing speed? I am worried that it's still slow or is it the speed compared to liquidsmooth?
Lollipop ROM runs on ART runtime, it's much more effective than Dalvik-based.
So far 2 weeks of use no lag at all, back when I was using Paranoid Android 4.6 or CM11 M12, there were some lag sometimes.
Battery life is more awesome than before. In previous ROMs, I don't use GPS and ended up like 30% battery by the end of the day.
With Lollipop, I use GPS 24/7 and ended up 30% battery by the end of the day too.
cracker12 said:
Try lollipop rom... In my opinion has much better camera than kitkat. The only iconvenience is that still don't have the option to sd and don't have pause on camcorder yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raven_Yen said:
Lollipop ROM runs on ART runtime, it's much more effective than Dalvik-based.
So far 2 weeks of use no lag at all, back when I was using Paranoid Android 4.6 or CM11 M12, there were some lag sometimes.
Battery life is more awesome than before. In previous ROMs, I don't use GPS and ended up like 30% battery by the end of the day.
With Lollipop, I use GPS 24/7 and ended up 30% battery by the end of the day too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I uses ART to speed up the system but the apps are bigger... Am I right? Is there the option to move some of the apps to the SD card?
jwsp1 said:
So I uses ART to speed up the system but the apps are bigger... Am I right? Is there the option to move some of the apps to the SD card?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sort of, I don't think there is an option for now for our device. Perhaps in the future.
Raven_Yen said:
Sort of, I don't think there is an option for now for our device. Perhaps in the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay thanks for your help so far, I'll try it out tomorrow and will report!
ClockworkMod recovery with SELinux support
Hey guys,
so I was trying to install the ROM but I got a "Status 7" Error which is caused by not having the SELinux support.
I was looking for the file for about an hour but I can't find it.
My CWM-based Recovery has the version 6.0.4.5.
jwsp1 said:
Hey guys,
so I was trying to install the ROM but I got a "Status 7" Error which is caused by not having the SELinux support.
I was looking for the file for about an hour but I can't find it.
My CWM-based Recovery has the version 6.0.4.5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try twrp or philztouch by haky
cracker12 said:
Try twrp or philztouch by haky
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks a lot, it finally works!
cracker12 said:
Try twrp or philztouch by haky
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the rom is great and the battery lasts so much longer but there are still some bugs. Its so great having the latest Android version on this "old" phone! But does any of you also have the problem that after every reboot, some of the app icons are missing/deleted?
jwsp1 said:
So the rom is great and the battery lasts so much longer but there are still some bugs. Its so great having the latest Android version on this "old" phone! But does any of you also have the problem that after every reboot, some of the app icons are missing/deleted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some apps that are installed on memory card its take more time to load
App2SD? Yep ,you can do that on lolipop
Sent from my GT-I9105P using XDA Free mobile app
jwsp1 said:
I am looking for a custom ROM for my Samsung Galaxy S II Plus (GT-I9105P) which is faster than the stock ROM.
I installed Liquidsmooth 3.0 and tested the speed and its working perfectly now. Its based on Android version 4.4.3. But the camera app is actually really bad; the pictures are always blurry. I guess something is wrong with the focus, because it works fine with the original 4.2.2 Samsung Camera App. I found out that I can't restore the app because Liquidsmooth (Andoid 4.4.3) doesn't support Touchwiz Apps.
Even the apps from the PlayStore are not as good as the old SamsungCamera App.
So here's my question: Is there a fast custom ROM (preferred a popular like LiquidSmooth) which is baised on 4.2.2? Or are there others who have also problems with blurry pictures in 4.4.3 and have a fix?
CWM 10.1.3 has a lot of bugs, like no vibration, so I don't want this ROM. LiquidSmooth 2.3 is baised on Andoird 4.2.2 but there is no Download Link for the SGS II Plus / doesn't supported? Or does the Phone model even matter?
Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is liquid smooth 3.2 (4.4.4) fyi,. you could try the new google camera from the play store. There are other kitkat roms that are also excellent(sprit,axxion,PAC,PA) should you think Lolipop is too buggy, but you cannot installed touchwiz apps on a custom rom, regardless of android version.
Yeungers said:
There is liquid smooth 3.2 (4.4.4) fyi,. you could try the new google camera from the play store. There are other kitkat roms that are also excellent(sprit,axxion,PAC,PA) should you think Lolipop is too buggy, but you cannot installed touchwiz apps on a custom rom, regardless of android version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay thanks a lot for your answer. I decided to update to Cm12 with Android 5. It's pretty good so far and the developers bring new updates very quickly.
Hello, I've tried various custom lollipop roms in the past few months and they all had problems. My personal observation is that the stock rom has always been more stable and superior and that I could not see any real functionality benefit with custom roms...Perhaps prism is the best one compared to all others.
Am I the only person here who has reached this conclusion?
Yes
zazazi said:
Hello, I've tried various custom lollipop roms in the past few months and they all had problems. My personal observation is that the stock rom has always been more stable and superior and that I could not see any real functionality benefit with custom roms...Perhaps prism is the best one compared to all others.
Am I the only person here who has reached this conclusion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never had any issue with any ROM and I love Samsung phones but I hate touchwiz
zazazi said:
Hello, I've tried various custom lollipop roms in the past few months and they all had problems. My personal observation is that the stock rom has always been more stable and superior and that I could not see any real functionality benefit with custom roms...Perhaps prism is the best one compared to all others.
Am I the only person here who has reached this conclusion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, if you have life out of your mobile phone then stock ROM is the best otherwise waste your life in never ending process of flashing and modding your phone......lolz. There will be a stage when you'll be happy that CM12.1 is half stable but then Android M will be out.
the stock ROM is much stable but it not so fast like custom, anyways you can try to use a custom for a while and decide what is the best for you
I also experienced that in costom always has a bugs... I using stock firmware together with Nova Launcher...
Stock here - 5.0.1 stable, smooth and fast. Don't see any point in changing.... And I used to be a big modder!
I tried cm 12.1 and returned to stock because it bored me. It didn't give me what I wanted. It's a bit overestimated. Rooting and flashing makes me addicted to phone. Never ending process. Always wanting more. Stick to original and enjoy.
Yes I agree with you till some point. Till now I have tried almost every rom out there for my 9505, but almost always I am coming back to stock. According to me and the current situation there are only two custom roms that are really providing stock stability and I have seen not a single bug, so they can be daily drivers. They are the current version of Danvdh's gpe rom (with the couple of the previous ones I had minor issues. At least after LP came out) and the second and the one where I have never experienced any single bug in no single version of it (LP or KK), and that is the TW rom from iB4stid (sadly he will not develop for 9505 anymore), goldeneye (and also goldenfinger in the time of KK). However goldeneye is almost same as stock so maybe thats why I like it.
The benefit that I see from using the goldeneye despite stock rom is that you can always use the latest rom relased but again stiching to the modem version of the operator that I am using my phone with (I do not have good experience with flashing separate modem packages), with that taking the best of both worlds. In this situation you have the modem that works best with your carrier and the latest base from samsung that has the same stability as the stock one.
Danvdh' gpe rom is good for me when I am tired from TW but again having very very stable and fast rom. Ive even have better battery life and I can say it is the snappiest rom out there. It is beyond Goldeneye regarding that criteria.
The only concern is surely that Samsung aren't going to release Android M for GS4? Just won't happen will it?
hi, i just bought i9505 , i want to install a custom rom but i hesitate.
Currently my i9505 is very stable and responsive with Stock rom based on lollipop 5.0.1
can you please tell me if is it a good idea to change to custom rom or not ? i want try UPSM and others mod
What is advantage if i change rom ?
is it easy to come back to stock if i decide to try custom rom ?
Thank you in advance
I've tried both custom and stock roms and I am now using a stock rom because I also own a Samsung Gear 2 Neo, which only works properly on the stock rom for now...
skezza said:
The only concern is surely that Samsung aren't going to release Android M for GS4? Just won't happen will it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We haven't even got 5.1 yet, I wouldn't hold your breath.
dontpannic said:
We haven't even got 5.1 yet, I wouldn't hold your breath.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, so it'll be custom ROM's from here on out then
skezza said:
True, so it'll be custom ROM's from here on out then
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I smell 5.1 stock ROM coming in a couple of months.....
myawan said:
I smell 5.1 stock ROM coming in a couple of months.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so. I've already fallen in love with this phone lol.
The problem with stock lollipop rom is that it doesn't have conference call feature. That's why I am staying away.
myawan said:
The problem with stock lollipop rom is that it doesn't have conference call feature. That's why I am staying away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why wouldn't you just use Hangouts or Skype?
stephendt0 said:
Why wouldn't you just use Hangouts or Skype?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't understand what I said! I am talking about merge call feature during two calls.
myawan said:
You didn't understand what I said! I am talking about merge call feature during two calls.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought I had seen that feature on Stock Lollipop? hmm, maybe not. Still, it's a niche feature (I actually work in business where conference calls are regular and we use a bridge), and as put Skype and Hangouts do it pretty well too.